Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Since English is a language where word forms do not change much (no inflections, cases) syntaxis
plays a major role for understanding a linguistic expression, in many cases we are not even able to tell
whether a word is verb or noun outside the syntactic context i.e. syntax is essential for English due to
the scanty morphological marking.
*water can be a noun/verb depending on the syntactic use.
The main unit of study in syntax is the sentence i.e. we need a definition about that linguistic structure.
II. Definition of the sentence : giving a precise and succinct definition is no mean feat. There
have been different attempts :
1. A traditional, logical definition : a sentence is a word or a group of words capable of expressing a
complete thought.
2. A transformational generative approach (Chomsky) `There is no need of a definition since the
whole grammar of a language is in fact an extended definition of the sentence + native speakers of
a language can intuitively identify the sentence.`
3. The psychological definition : the sentence is an expression of processes of combination of notions
in the interworld of the speaker and a means of reproducing the same combination of notions in the
inner world of the listener.
4. There is no single definition that is good enough to cover all aspects of the sentence as a major
linguistic unit; we need to take more comprehensive approach and this can be done by defining the
main features of the sentence : the sentence is an expression of combination of notions based on a
predicative relation; it expresses a thought and reflects some situation in reality;
The main features of the sentence are Predicativity, Modality, Intonation, Grammatical well-
formedness.
1. Predicativity is a structural feature of the sentence and is the back bone of human thinking and
linguistic statements. Simply, it means `saying sth about sth` ; it comprises relation of dependence
between two members one member which is what the statement is about, which is subjected to
description (the subject) and another member which predicates sth about the Subject, which
describes the Subject , ascribes features and charecteristics to the Subject,
Eg: The sky is blue.
`the sky` is what the sentence is about (Subject) and `is blue` is the Predicate charecterizing the
Subject. Predicativity is binary relation subject and Predicate; Subject and Predicate are correlative
notions a Subject functions only in correlation to a certain Predicate and vice versa.
The predicate relation is different from the attributive relation only the former expresses a thought,
statement, whereas the latter is like a label of some entity or phenomenon.
2. Modality this is not a structural but a semantic feature; it has to do with meaning. Modality refers
to the relation between statement and reality i.e. whether what is predicated is a fact or is merely
regarded as possible, desirable, imaginary.
Eg: The car is here. (factual modality)
The car must be her. ( non-factual subjective)
In some cases Intonation is the only difference between a sentence on the one hand and a word or
phrase on the other.
Cf:
He speak good - not grammatical
He speaks well. grammatical
1. The sentence is unique among other linguistic units : unlike words and phrases sentences don`t
exist as prefabricated units, there is no `vocabulary list of sentences`, sentences are created every
time a new in the act of communication following certain sentence patterns.
2. Sentences are units of communication they convey thaughts and messages; words and phrases
are simply labels of entities and phenomena.
3. Like other language units Sentences are pairing of meaning on the one hand and form on the other
i.e. a sentence has a semantic (meaning) aspect and a structural (morphosyntactic) aspect. And
these two aspects are not always in one-to-one correspondence; in some cases one meaning may be
expressed in more than one different structures
In other cases one structure may be pregnant with different interpretations ( meanings)
Eg: Flying planes can be dangerous. two interpretations :1. To fly planes 2. The flying planes
The shooting of the hunters was horrible. 1. The way they shoot 2. The way they were shot
4. A third aspect for the analysis of the sentence has been introduced in current linguistic theory
pragmatics (along with the structural and semantic aspects)
Pragmatics deals with the communicative value of sentences, for what purpose a sentence is used and
how information is distributed in the sentence. Distinction is made between old, already familiar, less
important information (theme) on the one hand and communicatively important salient, prominent
information (theme) on the other.
Cf: A : John developed that plan.
B : That plan was developed by John.
Semantically these are identical but pragmatically they are different i.e. there is different distribution of
information.
In A `John` is Theme and `that plan` is Rheme.
Normally the Theme is placed first and the Rheme comes at the end.
In B `that plan` is Theme and John is rheme.
Pragmatics = what we do with the sentences, their use, the communicative goals achieved.
1. According to communication :
A : Declarative
B : Interrogative
C : Imperative
D : Exclamatory
2. According to structure :
Most curent linguistic theories adopt a verbo-centric model for the description of clause structure i.e.
the verb predicate is assumed to be the central hub of the clause which determines what other
constituents will be attached to it; the different types of verbs combine with different types of
complements.
Types of verbs
1. Stative vs dynamic
Stative verbs denote a state, permanent condition which is homogenous over time; normally such verbs
do not make progressive forms.
Dynamic verbs denote some change of state, dynamic process which developes over time.
2. Intensive vs Extensive
Intensive verbs are `locked in` and and do not extend out of the sphere of the Subject.
3. Intransitive vs Transitive
Extensive verbs whose meaning does not affect (an)other constituent(s) are intransitive; they do not
take Objects.
Extensive verbs whose meaning affects (an)other constituent(s) are known as transitive they may
take Objects. When the meaning of a transitive verb involves one affected participant the verb is called
monotransitive.
When the meaning of the verb involves two affected participants is called ditransitive
Eg : to give sb sth
to show sb sth
to send sb sth
Another possible Object with transitive verbs is the so-called complex Object (i.e. made up of more
than one constituent )
Transitive verbs which take a complex object are defined az complex transitive.
Objects relate directly to the verb whereas complements complement some other constituent in the
clause
( Cs = Subject complement; Co = Object complement; and the verb Cp = Predicator complement)
eg: Objects
John kicked the ball. John gave the girl an apple.
\ \ \
Od Oi Od
(an apple to the girl)
Eg : Complements
She is a nurse. He became a driver. She made him sad. They elected him president.
\ / \ / \
Cs Od Co Od Co
Cp is special it is not recognised in all grammars; in many cases it looks like an Object because it
relates to the verb, however, it is very closely bound to the verb and without it the verb cannot function
or changes its meaning. Passivization in thiscase is impossible.
Optional extension
CLAUSE STRUCTURE
A place {1}
Intensive
Stative Cs {2}
Extensive - monotransitive Od {3}
(Transitive) - ditransitive Oi + Od {4}
Subject Verb - complex transitive Ocomplex {5}
Intensive {6}
Dynamic Intransitive
Extensive {7}
Transitive Monotransitive Od {8}
- Ditransitive Oi + Od {9}
- Complex transitive - Ocomplex {10}
1} S V (predicate)
2} S V C (complement) / Cs; Cp /
-A (adverbial)
-O
3} S V O C / Cs; Cv=Cp; Co /
-A
-O (Object)
Examples :
1. The train arrived
2. SVCs He is a teacher.(intensive, link = copulative verb)
SVCp He has a car.
The boy resembles his father.
SVA She is in London.
Mary lives here.
SVO John drinks beer. (Od)
3..SVOCs Mary will make John a good wife. (Oi)
SVOCo Mary will make John a fool.
SVOCp She turned him into a slave. (indispensable complement of the verb)
THE SUBJECT
I. Definition Subject is a main part of the sentence which along with the Predicate constitutes
the predicative relation (bond). Roughly speaking the Subject is `what the sentence is about`.
The term Subject comes from `to be subjected to description`.
In order to give an axhaustive definition of the Subject we need to take into account the following three
points (aspects) :
a) meaning of the Subject The Subject denotes a `thing` (in a general sense) which is described by
the predicate; it is usually an entity in some world (real or imaginary; concrete or abstract) an
Object / phenomenon / idea, etc.
b) syntactic relations Syntactically the Subject is the most important constituent : it is in initial
position and does not depend on other constituents; the Subject is in a special type of agreement
with the verbal predicate called Subject Verb Concorde (eg: i work / he works )
`Subject` is a syntactic function (just like predicate or object) which may code in itself different
semantic roles :
1. Agent (agentive Subject) denotes the doer (agent) of the verbal action
Eh: The boy broke the window.
2. Force Subject denotes natural force (mechanical) which performs the action w/o volition or
intention.
Eg: The wind broke the window.
The avalanche destroyed the house.
a) The Subject of verbs in the active voice which denotes a participant which suffers the
consequences of the verbal action
Eg: The boy fell down.
The bird dropped dead.
This is the lowest degree of affectedness.
b) with verbs of the so-called activo-passive type (active form; passive meaning)
eg: The chicken is cooking.
The house sold dear.
5. Recipient Subject
Again there are different stages (subtypes) of recipient(ness)
B:// With verbs of sense, perception where the Subject is recipient of visual or aural information or
some other perception.
Eg: She saw the tree / He heard the music.
Srec Sag.
Such passive Subject corresponds to Oi or Oprep with `to` in the active voice.
Eg: They gave Mary a book. They gave a book to Mary.
Oi rec O rec. Prep.
5. Unstressed `there`
Structures with unstressed `there` are known as existential sentences because they most often denote
existence.
Eg: There is a cat under the bed.
In this case too there are theoretical problems as to what the true Subject is.
Formally `there` is a Subject because it is in initial position and is involved in inversion and tag-
questions.
Eg: There is......
Is there ........., isn`t there?
The theoretical argumentation about `there` is similar to that about `it`.
It is more important however to stress on the pragmatic use of the `there` construction in English:
Since the English Subject is fixed only in initial positionthe `there` construction makes it possible to
shift theSubject to post-verbal position.
This may be necessary in the following case :
a) when the Subject denotes sth new and important and such elements are usually placed at the end of
the sentence.
Eg: .
A faint sound came through the door - the distribution of the information is not the same
Better : Through the door there came a faint sound.
b) When the Subject is very large and its initial position would seem unnatural because large
constituents are ususally placed at the endof the sentence.
Eg: The day when we finally met after many years of negotiations, broken promises, deceit and
downright lies, came. not good
Better : There came the day when we finally met...
Hence the `there` cinstruction is a very important mechanism, for achieving certain pragmatic and
communicative goals and it compensates for the rigid word order in English and it makes it possible to
place the Subject i post-verbal position.
`There` also occurs in non-existential sentences with `there`.
Eg: There stood an enormous statue in the hall.
There does not appear to have been any change in their views.
There are also passive sentences with `there`.
Eg: In 1929 there was commited the most horrible crime in the history of USA.
6. A prepositional phrase
Eg: After five o`clock is the best time to meet.
Within two miles of the airport would be too noisy.
THE PREDICATE
I. Definition the predicate is the sevond main part of the sentence which along with the
Subject constitutes the predicative bond (relation). It ascribes the features and properties too
or denotes some relations of the Subject.
2. S N P
This is a noun or adjective w/o link verbs;
There are two subtypes which are usually exclamations:
3. The Compound Verbal Predicate (C V P ) consist of two parts: semi-auxiliary + notional part
The semi-auxiliary is a finite verb form (limited to person, number and tense) and it usually carries
modal or aspective meaning (aspective relates to what is commonly known as action`s art, mode of
action)
Eg: Beginning, duration, ending, entirety, etc.
Accordingly there are two subtypes of Compound Verbal Predicate:
-modal C V P
- aspective C V P
The notional part of the C V P bears the basic semantic content and is usually an infinite form or
infinitive form.
a) The Modal C V P there are different structures subsumed here all of themn denote
modality in some way:
- be going to + infinitive
Here belong also phrases like had better / have best / would better
b) The aspective C V P
In this case semi-auxiliary bears aspective meaning of duration, beginning, ending...
Such verbs are : begin, commense, keep, go on, continue, stop, finish, cease + infinitive / -ing form
Here belong also phrases denoting habitual repeated actions in the past.
Used to / would + infinitive
Eg: She used to use my restroom. He would get up early every morning.
The Cs is substantival nominal or adjectival constituent and it follows the link verb.
Many verbs in English may have different function full lexical verb, on the one hand or link verb on
the other.
Cf: She ran fast. (full lexical) He ran his father`s factory. (full lexical)
The river ran dry. (Vlinkno lexical meaning, Compound Nominal Predicate)
She grew proud. ( Vlink, C N P )
He grew a beard.( lexical, transitive, S V P)
It grew dark. ( V link )
All link verbs are reducible either `be` ( for stative verbs) or `become` (for dynamic verbs)
Some verbs may have a double function / meaning- link verb on the one hand with some lexical
meaning on the other.
Eg: She sat amazed. She married young. He died a beggar.
Such cases are known as `double predicates`.
Cf: She married young. = She married. + She was young.
Lexical Vlink + Cs
A link verb can also be in the passive voice in cases like : He was found guilty.
She was reported missing.
The link vreb in the C N P is typically void of lexical meaning but in some cases it may exhibit a
`double` charecter - the lexicalised Vlink on the one hand a lexical meaningfull verb on the other.There
are gradations / stages in the weakening of the lexical meaning, as can be illustrated with `go` below:
a) She went to Britain as a child.
Double P
The verb `go` has retained/attained lexical meaning.
THE PREDICATIVE ( Cs )
I. Definition - the Cs is that part of the C N P which follows the Vlink but refers to the Subject.
It designates features and charecteristics of the Subject. As such, it is typically an adjective or
a noun but may also be realised by other morphological parts.
Eg: She is nice. ( Cs ) He is strong. ( Cs )
II. Classification
1. According to the meaning of the Vlink:
a) predicatives of `being` - they represent a permanent quality or feature
eg: He looks nice. They appear happy.
These are all redicible to the stative meaning `to be`
b) predicatives of `becoming` - these denote some new feature or quality
eg: She became a nurse. The sky turned red.
These are all reducible to `become`.
The milk went sour. = became
3. A prepositional phrase
Eg: He looks of about my age. ( Prep. Cs )
4. A finite clause
Eg: His theory is that mutations are not brought about by chance.Things remained as they had been in
the past.
THE OBJECT
I. Definition Object is a secondary part of the Sentence denoting a participant (or thing)
directly or indirect affected by / involved in the verbal action; like the Subject it is typically a
substantival constituent and follows the verb in the English clause.
While the Subject presents the primary perspective (vantage point) of the linguistic expression the
starting point / what we are talking about, the Object represents the end point, the goal of the verbal
action - the secondary perspective ( secondary vantage point)
Eg: John kicked the door. ( O )
II. Types basically Objects are subdivided in terms of their affectedness / involvement in the
verbal action : direct and indirect Objects respectively.
1. The direct Object is the only Object which follows monotransitive verbs. It refers to a participant
directly affected bt the verbal action.
Eg: John broke the bottle.
i.e. : if there is only one Object the verb it must be Odirect;
2. The O indirect is the second Object along with the Od which follows ditransitive verbs like show,
send, give.
Eg: She sent her mother a letter.
Oi Od
Features of the Oi:
A) it cannot stand alone, it must be accompanied by Od
cf: She sent her mother. ( . )
NB! There is no Oi proper ( in the strict sense ) in Bulgarian.
What is commonly called Oi proper in BG is in fact a prepositional Object.
Eg: .
B) The Oi paraphrases into a prepositional Object with `to` ( if it is a benefective - `for` )
Cf: She sent a letter to her mother.
Oprep
She cooked a meal for her mother.
Od Oprep
She cooked her mother a meal.
Oben Od
C) The Oi always precedes the Od the only exception is when the Od is a pronoun.
Eg: She sent it her.
Od/Oi
D) The Oi is always animate (human). The Od may be a `thing` , human.
The feature human explains why the Oi always precedes the Od. Since language is an androcentric
( ) phenomenon (human-oriented) human is more central, more importantnthan
non-human.
Since the Oi is aleays human it takes precedence over the Od and comes closer to the verb i.e. it
immediately follows the verb.
NB! There is a small group of transitive verbs in English where the dustinction between the Od and Oi
is hard to tell.
Eg: To forgive the girl her stupidity.
Presumably `the girl` is an Oi and `her stupidity` is Od. However `the girl` isn`t `normal` Oi because :
1. It can stand alone; 2. It doesn`t paraphrase as an Oprep.
Cf: *He forgave the stupidity to the girl.
Otherwise `the girl` above is pretty much like a regular Oi because it is human and it it comes first
before the Object. Actually because it`s human it comes first.
For such reasons cases like `forgive` are treated as verbs (according to Dim. Spassov) to teach sb sth,
envy, strike sb a blow
Note : Any Object in English can become a Subject in a corresponding passive expression in fact this
is reliable test of Object-hood.
Eg: I have a car. ( Predicator Complement )
c) locative Object - denotes location; such Objects usually result from prepositional adverbial
modifiers where the preposition has been omitted.
Eg: He walked 8 the streets. (along adverbial modifier)
To swim * the river (across) ; to pas * the house (by) ; The horse jumped 8 the fence. (over)
This phenomenon seems to be gaining ground in current English because English is a very rational
language and any element which can be guessed may be omitted. The same phenomenon exists in BG ,
too but is very limited. Eg: !
2. Oi can have the following semantiv specifications in most cases the Oi has the semantic role
Recipient ( a dativ participant ) and it is always [human].
Cf: I found your mother a place in the house.
Human Oi
I found the television a place in the house.
Not human, not recipient
Correct: I found a place for the TV in the house.
There is only one exception when Oi isn`t recipient / human:
Eg: I gave the door three kicks. I gave the car a wash.
/ \
affected Oi effected Oi
Oprep can be with different prepositions `to` or `for` for `Dativ` or `benefective` relations respectively
- to the girl
-for the girl
or other prepositions like `at`, `for` for akusativ relations.
NB! The Oprep should be distinguished from the prepositional adverbial modifier. The preposition of
the Oprep is determined (governed) by the verb.
Look at girl, house, tree... wait at corner / on table / under bed
With a prepositional adverbial modifier the preposition does not depend on the verb but it is determined
by the meaning of the adverbial modifier itself.
An additional morphological type of O is the complex Object (consists of two parts). There are two
kinds of Ocomplex:
a) the true, prototypical Ocomplex is a nexus construction (contains non-finite verb form)
eg: I heard her snore. I noticed him disappear.
b) another (more arguable type) of Ocomplex consists of O + Co - not accepted in all grammars
Eg: She made him a fool. They elected him president.
Od Co
And finally there is a mixed type of Ocomplex with the `for.....to.....`
Eg: They waited for the lecture to be over. (prep. Ocomplex) And over it was
NEXUS CONSTRUCTION
I. Definition these are structures based on non-finite verb forms the infinitive , -ing form and
the past participle to solve the problem was her ambition. (nexus has the function of
Subject)
II. NC vs `Regular clauses`
Both the NC and the RC are based on predicativity; the difference between them is that the syntagmatic
relations in the clause are overtly indicated and fixed in time.
Eg: He works hard. vs He worked hard.
On the other hand the NC does not indicate the syntagmatic and tense relations explicitly, it is covert
and is Subject to decoding / interpretation depending on the general context.
Eg: Working hard he got rich
we shall never get rich
you might get sick
Obviously the NC is an implicit structure and needs further interpretation on part of the listener i.e.
commands greater attention. Thus NC s are more universal (they fit in different contexts) and they are a
greater challenge for the listener i.e. they are more informationally loaded. For these reasons NCs are
widely used in current English.
NB! In BG however such constructions are to be avoided ( God knows why!)
III. Syntactic functions of NC
The NC may have different functions in the sentence:
1. Subject
Eg:Settling down to married life brings out the worst in people.
2. Object
Eg: I have seen the play performed in Oxford.
3. Predicative
Eg: She appeared to like it ( Cs; NC infinitive)
4. Attribute
Eg: His anxiety to meet you is unabated. (attribute to `anxiety`)
5. Adverbial Modifier
Eg: John made a fortune by selling junk food. (AM of manner)
The NCI may also occur wirh intransitive non-passive verbs like `see`, `appear`, `happen`;
Eg: I happened to meet them there. (NCI)
INP verb
She appeared to enjoy that.
Here belong also phrases like : `be sure`, `be certain`, `be likely`
Eg: He is certain to come next week. (NCI)
They are likely to like it. (NCI)
d) Object
Eg: He proposes for them to join us. (O)
e) adverbial modifier
eg: She streched her hand out for me to look at. (adverbial modifier of purpose)
1. extrapositional attribute
eg: Broken in spirit, he retired to his casttle.
NC
2. absolute construction
eg: The job done, we went home.
NC
3. unattached participle
eg: Once married, what could people say. (very rare!!!)
4. Nexus Object
eg: I heard the problem discussed in class.
NC object
WORD ORDER
I. Introduction- because of the very `economical` morphological marking in English (almost complete
lack of verbal inflections) the word order in that language is very rigid (non-flexible) and fixed. The
basic (declarative, non-negative, non-emphatic, non-interrogative) word order sequence in English is
S V X where X is some complement or Object.
There are two major deviations from the basic word order pattern : inversion and dislocation.
1. Inversion mainly has a grammatical function to indicate that the clause is not declarative; eg: to
indicate questions, etc;
Inversion is : S V V S, that is a change in the S-V sequence; depending on what kind of verb
comes before the Subject we have two subtypes of inversin:
a) partial when the auxiliary verb is before the Subject.
Vaux S .....Vfull
Eg: I know this. Do I know this?
S V O Vaux / Vfull /O
b) full inversion when Vfull comes before the subject in a pattern like this:
.......Vfull S......
eg: Here comes the sun.
Vfull S
Full inversion
2, Dislocation this is shifting some clausal constituent to initial position like this:
S V X X S V A`-` inversion or X V S B `+` inversion (dislocation of X)
In some case the dislocation of some cvonstituent X does not entail inversion (case A)
eg: This I know. (dislocation of the object)
O S V
In other cases the dislocation of some element X entails also inversion.
Eg: Never have I seen such a fool. (dislocated adverbial modifier, partial inversion)
AM Vaux S Vfull O (Vaux S Vfull)
Summary: inversion is a phenomenon with mainly grammatical function it indicates interrogation,
exclamation, etc, grammatical processes.
Dislocation on the other gand, has mainly a communicative function- it indicates emphasis, focus of
some element placed in clause initial osition; in some class dislocation may entail inversion.
Types of inversion : A partial ( Vaux S...)
Full (Vfull S...)
B when inversion has grammatical function it is called functional; when inversion
is caused by dislocation it is called dislocational.
3. Imperative sentences only in the case of the so-called enhanced negative imperative
Don`t you go there!
4. Exclamatory sentences this type is very restricted and is used mainly in literary style
How boring is this lecture!
How beautiful is this valley!
III. Dislocation since the second type of inversion (dislocational) isa caused by the dislocation
of some clausal constituent, it should be described along with the different cases of
dislocation.
The following constituents can be dislocated:
1. Dislocation of the Subkect
Since the Subject is in initial position anyway we can speak of this location of the Subject only in the
case of complex discontinued Subjects with anticipatory (introductory) `it`.
Eg: It is hard to do this. (complex discontinued Subject)
in concessive clauses
although / in spite of / regardless with as
eg: Tired as was the student she persisted.
Cs V S
Full invertion
NB! If a Sibject is a pronoun there is no invertion, however.
Eg: Tired as she was....
b) invertion
when Cs is a stressed demonstrative
eg: He is a fool! That he certainly is!
| S V
stressed demonstrative
with link emphasis
eg: I expected her to be nice and nice she was.
In colloquial exclamations
Right you are!
Cs Sv
A confounded nuisance (wo)men are!
NB! In literary style however exclamations are usually + invertion.
Eg: Green is the valley, blue is the sky!
2. There si full dislocational invertion in transitive verbs + postfix when the postfix is dislocated in
initial position (placed at the beginning)
Out went the lights, in rushe the guests. (full invertion) (communicatively loaded)
3. There is invertion in the comment phrase of direct speech when the verb is a commonly used one.
Eg: `No`, said he.
This type of invertion occurs even when the comment phrase precedes the direct speech.
Eg: -said he, `No.`
NB! This invertion is to be avoided when the comment verb is less common not so frequently used
like ;`to declare`. ` to add`.
Invertion in such cases is not acceptable when the comment phrase is more complex, which can be the
case in:
a) when it contains some object complement
eg: `No`, he told me.
*`No`, told he me.
b) when the comment phrase contains analytical verb forms.
Eg: `No`, he has said.
*`No`, has he said.
Owarimasu