Bosnia, Illyrians and

tombstones beginning of
European civilization

Continuity of our people from the old days

up to today was not in question, and it was
part of the scientific discourse until the end
of the XIX century. Therefore, up until that
period everyone knew that south Slavs
were actually Illyrians. However, after the
Illyrian name, crest with a crescent moon
and tri colour were banned by the
Map of Bosnia and Herzegovina - Steci
emperors decree, by Germanic-Hungarian
political decision the progeny of the The greatest historical lie which brought the
ancient Illyrians were declared as greatest suffering in the Balkans is the one
about the influx of Slavs to this area, this myth
Albanians, and south Slavs all of a sudden
started with systematic destruction of the
became settlers from Carpathians. Illyrian people and their ancient culture. Slavs
were therefore always unsophisticated and
primitive people, and their name comes from
Ancient Illyrians the word servant, slave, these people in
reality dont have structures nor cultural
Since long we are aware that Bosnia and achievements, and they were always to the
Herzegovina represents an ancient land with its civilized and colonial Europe a symbol of
tombstones, with its ancient people, which barbarism and primitivism, to which we can
surprised Europe with its unexplored world once attest to today. Namely, when we would
it was occupied by Austro-Hungary in 1878. For performs a poll across Italy, Germany, France or
the first time, entire Europe was aware that on Britain on the topic of Slavs we could hear some
the territory of BiH there was a unique cult, pretty unpleasant comments and judgements,
anthropological and national space which which is a result of traditional belief but also
possesses the most imposing and the oldest ranking of European peoples, civilized western
megalithic culture in whole of Europe. The and primitive eastern peoples.
occupying force did not like this, it actually
presented them a large problem: size and
hoariness of our culture made Western Europe
inferior, and their civilizations mission absurd.
This is why a systematic plan of twisting
historical facts was put into place, which was an
easy task taking into consideration the pretty
bad military, economic, demographic but also
educational condition of the people living in BiH
at that time.

Until the beginning of the Austro-Hungarian

occupation of Bosnia and Herzegovina the
theory of the great immigration was not
seriously considered until the ruin of the Illyrian
movements happened, this is best described by
the historian Bogoslav ulek (1816-1895).
According to him, first the immigrants were of
the same birth as the Illyrians, and second they
could not outnumber the Illyrian aboriginals
which inhabited the entire Yugoslavian area, and
even further than that. Dr. Tibor ivkovi
(1966-2013) also confirmed that during the VI
and VII century only a couple of thousand
people migrated and not hundreds of
thousands, this Serbian historian of the newer
generation estimated that during that period the
part of immigrated people among the However, despite all frauds and historical
aboriginals did not exceed 3%. rigging, gradually enlightenment in scientific
circles began and extensive research of various
archaeologists and experts confirm that the
Croatian historian Dr. Neven Budak similarly origin of tombstone dates back to the ancient
concludes that the older historiography time even prehistory. Thoughts about
mistakenly believed that the ancient aboriginals prehistoric origin of tombstones was shared by
were deported and exterminated in large an Austrian geologist and researchers Heinrich
numbers, with a minority staying in Sterneck which as an Austro-Hungarian officer-
mountainous regions, coastal areas and islands. geologist researched mineral wealth of Bosnia
According to him, modern research in various and Herzegovina and found various necropolis
areas proved that aboriginals survived in in the field. He thought that the tombstones
greater numbers than was previously presumed. most certainly belonged to the ancient times,
Bosnian historian uro Besler also claims that since they were usually located on Illyrian piles
85% of the ancient inhabitants stayed. Vladimir or in their vicinity and that theyre old as the
Dvornikovi in his Magnum opus Illyrian burial mounds. The other researcher
Characterology of Yugoslavs recognises an Alexandar Sapieha spoke about tombstones as
ancient Illyrian in humans of the Dinaric karst. very old monuments which resemble Egyptian
and Parthian ones. German archaeologist
Steci Illyrian tombstones George Wild had an interesting claim, namely
the tombstones in Bosnia represent the old
After inventing lies that Illyrians are actually European cultural heritage, and that some
Slavs another lie begins, it places the symbols such as lilies (which are symbols on the
emergence of tombstones, the ancient Bosnian crest) stems from the ancient times,
monuments of the Illyrian culture, into the often as tombstones, that various types of
middle ages, since Western Europe cannot crosses are pre-Christian and were known in the
tolerate the fact that in BiH there is proof of the ancient culture, and Christianity adopted them
existence of the oldest culture on European soil. at a later period, giving them Christian
Implications of discovering tombstones in the interpretation.
XIX century is that the European roots and
continuity of existence belongs to our culture,
which is in fact very logical: whoever opened an
ancient atlas knows that it is nowhere stated
that the European culture was begotten in
Berlin, London, Vienna or Paris. To prevent
further political and geopolitical implications of
this cognition, the truth had to be buried under
the deposits of twisted narrative.

Yet, the best proof that tombstones were not
built in the middle ages are the dimensions and
weight of a large number of tombstones. There
is no technological context which would place
the practice of breaking off of 32 ton megaliths
and their transportation of across great
distances. Anyway, why would someone do such
a thing, and not use such technology in building
other structures. Kemal olak from Sarajevo
calculated that for the construction of such a
megalith which is located in Pavlovac near
Sarajevo, one would need to break off a cuboid
of 40 tons. A logical question can be posed,
where would one find such a quarry, and what
tools were used for such a purpose. It is
especially interesting to mention that some
locals claimed that the monument is located on
the former training grounds of JNA, and that the
army removed all other monuments from that
location, but they didnt have the necessary
machinery to remove this one. What did the
man from middle ages use to move it? With
that, in the dark middle ages, times of wars,
fratricide and crusades against Arian Christians,
time of famine, poverty and survival, there was
no time for erecting hundred thousand
monuments, nor the time for laborious and long
transportation and great embellishment of the
monuments. Was it done in the middle ages,
such a powerful and technically advanced
civilization would easily fend off attackers and
conquer entire Europe.
There are numerous arguments which testify
that tombstones cannot be from the middle
ages, though in the middle ages they were
used, partially inscribed and ornamented. Here
are some of them:
1. Official science until the end of the 19th
century considered tombstones to be prehistoric
monuments.
2. It was noted that the symbols on the
monuments were tied to ancient civilizations,
especially Egyptian and Parthian.
3. There are no known folk tales which speak of
construction of monuments in the middle ages.
However, there are numerous ones which place
the process far in prehistory.
4. There are no inscriptions about the building
of monuments amongst the ancient people from
Dubrovnik, and it is known that the agents from
Dubrovnik recorded anything which was of the
smallest interest. Such inscriptions are not
known in other archives of Dalmatia and Italy.
5. In heaps under the monuments we see a
continuation of burials from the 20th century
BCE up until the 20th century.
6. Tombs from the middle ages on necropolis
are located near tombstones or underneath
stone switches, i.e. smaller tombstones, which
proves the continuity of burial from prehistory,
but not their medieval origin.
7. From around 100 000 tombstones, and there
were more, only 6000 of them are ornamented,
and a smaller number contains various crosses
which were pre-Christian and familiar in ancient
times. Yet if we persist that theyre actually
Christian symbols, were talking about a number
which is smaller than 1%. The possibility of
Christians avoiding cross symbols when
ornamenting is simply absurd.
8. In the middle ages in Dalmatia, Bosnia and
Serbia numerous wars were waged, mostly
crusades against Arian Christians, during this
time social-economic conditions were not ripe
for erection of megalith necropolis.
9. Depiction of ancient pillars of a temple in
numerous megalith monuments additionally
confirms the pre-historical origin of tombstones.
10. Layers of humus on monuments which are
today underground are between 30 and 80 cm,
while on Roman monuments they are between
15 and 30 cm, which rather points to the Bronze
age and not the Middle Ages.
11. That burial under tombstones and under a
mound was a custom from the Bronze age is
depicted through the verses from the Iliad and
Odyssey in which burials of cremation remains
are mentioned, bodies in a heap on which a
tombstone was placed.
12. Tombstones are also mentioned in the Old
Testament, which also points to the Bronze and
Iron age.
Illyrian god Vidasus on steak