Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ABSTRACT
Provenance analysis of the sediments from foredeep basins is and 6 Ma, from an active volcanic arc towards a recycled
crucial in understanding the contemporaneous orogenic exhu- orogenic belt, concurrent with an important increase of
mation processes. We report in this paper complex sediment accumulation rate. This change was triggered by exhumation
provenance analysis using sandstone petrography and mud- and erosion of the outer nappes from East Carpathians.
stone geochemistry, combined with magnetic susceptibility of
the Upper Miocene to Pliocene deposits from Focs ani foredeep Terra Nova, 19, 120126, 2007
basin (Romania). Data show a change of source area between 5
was not yet deeply understood (Clo- sedimentary features typical for shal-
Introduction and Geological
etingh et al., 2004); also our know- low water facies, despite the salinity
overview
ledge about its temporal and spatial changes.
The East Carpathians (Fig. 1) repre- relationship with other basins in the Magnetostratigraphy provided the
sent an uplifted fold-and-thrust belt Paratethys region had some weak high-resolution age control on these
attached to a Neogene volcanic arc points (Jipa, 1997; Vasiliev et al., sediments, and showed that their ages
which provided sediments both to the 2004), and virtually nothing was range from 8.6 Ma (or the 9.5 Ma
Transylvania and foredeep basins. known about the source area of the second option) at the base to 2.5 Ma
According to ssion-track data, ero- huge amount of sediments accumu- at the top (Vasiliev et al., 2004). How-
sion of the northern East Carpathians lated in this basin (Tarapoanca et al., ever, after detailed analysis of mag-
began around 12 Ma, while in the 2003). netic susceptibility and timing of main
southern part erosion started only at The basin was lled up with volcanic eruptions, the optimal corre-
45 Ma (Sanders et al., 1999). Con- Mio-Pliocene (Upper Sarmatian to lation of the magnetostratigraphy
temporaneous volcanic activity took Romanian in Eastern Paratethys with astronomical polarity timescale
place in the Calimani, Gurghiu and chronostratigraphic nomenclature) (APTS) is Vasilievs rst option; thus
Harghita Mountains (Fig. 1). Thus shallow marine to shallow lacustrine Putna section ranges from 8.6 to 5 Ma
large quantities of detrital material sedimentary deposits. Very good expo- and Ramnicul Sarat section ranges
derived from uplifted orogen and sures are on the western ank of the between 7.3 and 2.5 Ma (Fig. 2).
from active volcanic sources became basin along the almost continuously Palaeomagnetic data from these two
available. The foredeep basin formed outcropping Putna and Ramnicul Sar- sections show that no signicant rota-
during Middle Miocene to Pliocene at river sections (Fig. 1). These sec- tions aected these deposits after their
times in front of the East Carpathians, tions consist in the lower part (Upper deposition (Dupont-Nivet et al.,
reached anomalous thickness (13 km, SarmatianMeotian) of alternating 2005).
Tarapoanca et al., 2003) in the shallow marine sandstones and shales Our case study shows that detailed
Focsani Depression (Fig. 1). During (Saulea, 1956) tilted to near vertical provenance analysis gives important
Pliocene times deformation of this positions and in the upper part (Pon- additional spatial and temporal con-
foredeep basin started, resulting in tianDacianRomanian) of brackish straints on the history of exhumation
near vertical tilting and erosion on to lacustrine deltaic shales, siltstones, events and on the palaeogeographic
the western ank (Dumitrescu et al., sandstones and coals (Pana, 1966; evolution of the Focsani foredeep
1970; Matenco and Bertotti, 2000; Grasu et al., 1999), progressively less basin (Romania).
Tarapoanca et al., 2003). tilted to about 2030E. Most of the
Focsani foredeep basin received palaeocurrent features (measured on
Provenance analysis
recently much attention because its both river sections) show a dominant
relationship with subduction plane NNWSSE trend, which agrees with
Sandstone petrography
the general NS facies distribution:
proximal facies in the north (Putna) We used optical microscopy to assess
Correspondence: Dr Cristina E. Panaiotu, and slightly distal facies towards the the clasts origin from sandstones of
Faculty of Geology and Geophysics, Miner- south (Ramnicul Sarat). However, the Putna and Ramnicul Sarat sec-
alogy Department, University of Bucharest, during the entire basin evolution, no tions. After careful examination of the
1 N.Balcescu, 010041 Bucharest, Romania. important change in the water depth degree of diagenetic alteration, several
Tel.: +40 745693609; fax: +40 21 2113120; occurred, as all sediments have cemented sandstones were selected for
e-mail: panaiotu@geo.edu.ro
Fig. 1 Geological sketch map showing the location of the two studied sections and the position of the Focsani foredeep basin
(Focsani Depression on the map) with respect to potential source areas. 1 East Carpathians CretaceousTertiary nappe system;
2 Neogene-Quaternary volcanic arc; 3 Crystalline basement and its Mesozoic cover; 4 East European Platform; 5 North
Dobrogean Promontory; 6 Moesian Platform, white dots sampling areas from potential sources (40 samples), labelled
isolines isobaths in metres at the base of Neogene (after Dumitrescu and Sandulescu, 1970).
further modal analyses. Samples andesite) and large biotite crystals contain variable amount of metamor-
showing dissolution of feldspars, large (Fig. 3), suggesting their provenience phic and recycled sedimentary clasts
and inhomogeneous matrix content, from a direct volcanoclastic source (2045%) and quartz (1535%).
and high degree of clasts fractures without sedimentary recycling. There- Sandstones from the upper part of
have been discarded. The studied fore, the source area is limited to the the sections (62.5 Ma) are dominated
sandstones are compositionally imma- Calimani and Gurghiu Mountains by metamorphic and sedimentary
ture because of high content of feld- which were active during the same lithoclasts, being free of volcanic
spar and lithics, and also texturally period (9.46.5 Ma according to Segh- lithoclasts (Fig. 3). Frequent unal-
immature because of highly angular edi et al., 2004, 2005). No other vol- tered microcline and albite grains have
grain shapes and low degree of grain- canic province qualies for source been observed, as well as lot of quartz
size sorting. area: the nearby Harghita Mountains with undulatory extinction. All these
Sandstones from the lower part of are too young (<6 Ma) and the older features suggest a metamorphic source
the sections (8.66 Ma) commonly (129 Ma) are mainly intrusive sills area, but no metamorphic complex is
contain zoned plagioclase (andesine and dikes located far north of Cali- presently exposed in the region; the
3245% An) grains, without any sign mani Mountains (Pecskay et al., 1995; nearest ones are located 150 km to the
of weathering, many unaltered vol- Mason et al., 1998). However, besides west or north-west. These areas
canic lithoclasts (andesite, basaltic volcanic clasts, these sandstones also cannot be considered as potential
Fig. 3 Sandstones petrography and their potential source area based on Dickinson
(1985) diagram and point counting method (300 grains counted per thin section, e.g.
Ingersoll et al., 1984). Diamonds Sarmatian to Meotian (8.56 Ma) sandstones;
triangles Pontian to Romanian (62 Ma) sandstones, Q quartz grains (both
monocrystalline and polycrystalline), F feldspar grains, L lithic fragments.
Magnetic susceptibility
Magnetic susceptibility measurements
have been done on a Kappabridge
KLY-3 at University of Utrecht, on
the same samples as the magnetostrati-
graphy (Vasiliev et al., 2004) which
means all kind of rocks: shales, silt-
stones and ne-grained sandstones.
Plotting the results against age reveals
some specic features (Fig. 6): (1) the
Putna section comprises rocks with
relatively strong, but largely varying
magnetic susceptibilities (highest val-
ues are from sandstones) carried
mainly by detrital magnetite; (2) the Fig. 6 Mudstones magnetic susceptibility and the possible sources of exceptional
Ramnicul Sarat section contains rocks high values. Circles Putna section; Stars Ramnicul Sarat section.
with relatively weak magnetic suscep-
tibility and less variation (however,
less sandstones in this section) carried
mainly by iron sulphides (Vasiliev
et al., 2004).
We conclude that the episodic input
of magnetite grains and proximal
sedimentary environments (oxygen-
ated waters) are responsible for the
susceptibility pattern of Putna section.
Large amount of magnetite grains
could have been derived from con-
temporaneously active volcanoes like
those from Calimani and Gurghiu
Mountains. The higher values of mag-
netic susceptibility strongly reduce
towards the upper part of the Putna
section (6.55.5 Ma). The weaker sus-
ceptibility in the rocks from the
Ramnicul Sarat section is explained
by partial dissolution of primary mag-
netite grains and by authigenesis of
iron sulphide crystals in more redu- Fig. 7 Sedimentation rates calculated between the calibrated points of the magneto-
cing and distal sedimentary environ- stratigraphy with APTS (after Vasiliev et al., 2004). Note the doubling of sedimen-
ments. tation rate after 6 Ma.