Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
in the
Gardener's Compound
of
Glastonbury Abbey
GAG 08
Carried out for the Trustees of Glastonbury Abbey
Glastonbury Abbey Museum Accession Number: GLSGA: 2008/12
Contents
Appendix 1: Iron Age Pottery Report by Elaine Morris
Appendix 2: Context List
Appendix 3: Finds Lists
Appendix 4: Photograph Gallery
Appendix 1: Iron Age Pottery
By Elaine L Morris
A total of 42 sherds (466 grammes) of redeposited Iron Age pottery recovered from
modern deposit context 02 was submitted for analysis and reporting. Rims, one base,
decorated and plain body sherds are present in the collection. Although the overall
mean sherd weight is moderate at 11g, the sherds are in good condition with surface
treatments and evidence of use clearly visible on several sherds. Each sherd was
examined using a binocular microscope at x10 power to establish the main inclusions
present in the fabric. In addition, eight body sherds were selected for thin sectioning
and petrological analysis to clarify the main fabrics; these are indicated with an
asterix (*) and the details observed in thin section are included in the fabric
descriptions. The pottery was examined and recorded digitally using the guidelines
for analysis and reporting of later prehistoric pottery established by the Prehistoric
Ceramics Research Group (PCRG 1995, 1997) and comparative charts provided in
these publications were used for reference. The dataset is presented here as a separate
file. Eleven rim and decorated body sherds were chosen for illustration (Fig. 00).
Fabrics
A remarkable array of fabrics was defined from amongst this modest collection; 12
fabric types in four fabric groups are detailed below and quantified in Table GAG08
IA pottery.
The largest fabric group by weight of sherds is the calcareous group (221g; 47.4% of
the collection). This includes demonstrably calcite-rich fabrics (C1, C2, C4, C6) as
well as those which may be predominantly limestone (C3, C5), but not fossil shell-
bearing fabrics which are discussed separately below. Fabrics C1, C2, C4 and C6
contain distinctive crystals of calcite. In particular, the white crystals found in fabric
C6 measure up to about 2mm across, fragmentation which fits well with the
description of Peacocks Group 3 interpreted as most likely to be an added, tempering
agent rather than a natural inclusion in the clay (1969, 48). This distinctive fabric was
also identified recently in the Shapwick Project assemblage (Morris 2007, 568, fabric
CA1) but is interestingly absent from the Meare Village West 1979 assemblage
(Bailey 1981; Orme, et al. 1981, 48-9). Fabric C4, however, is much coarser in
texture with poorly-sorted, larger, white calcite fragments, which is definitely a
different fabric type and similar to fabric CA2 in the Shapwick Project assemblage
(Morris 2007, 568). Fabric C1 has obvious limestone rock in addition to calcite and
C2 is a very degraded-appearing calcite. Fabrics C3 and C5 are also very different
from the calcite-bearing fabrics as they have various types of limestone present
including sandy limestone in fabric C3. Nevertheless, all of these calcareous fabrics
could have been made from different deposits found in the Mendip Limestone range,
located approximately 8-15km northeast of Glastonbury (Peacock 1969, fig. 2).
The second most common is the fossil shell group (111g; 23.8%), consisting of two
fabric types. Fabric S1 is very coarse with significant quantities of both fossiliferous
limestone and disaggregated fragments of the fossil shell which can measure up to
7mm across. The shapes of these inclusions, however, are indicative that they may
well have been naturally-occurring in the clay, ranging from subangular to round in
shape. This fabric is not dissimilar to fabric SH2 in the Shapwick Project assemblage
(Morris 2007, 568) but does not appear in the Meare Village West 1979 assemblage
which is dominated by an argillaceous fabric of either grog temper or clay pellets and
a shelly limestone and sandstone fabric without disaggregated fossil shell present
(Orme, et al. 1981, 48, fabrics 3 & 4). Fabric S2 is distinctive by having angular fossil
shell which is much finer in texture with the majority of fragments measuring less
than 3mm. In addition, there are only rare pieces of limestone, one of which is a large
piece of shelly limestone. Therefore, these two fabrics probably derive from similar
sources but not the same bed or beds, and the latter may have been a tempered fabric
based on the texture of the shell fragments, but this is far from certain. Fabric S1 is
very similar to Peacocks Group 4 description, but this was cautioned with a sound
understanding that petrological subdivisions were possible based on a broad
distribution of the pottery itself and the extent of, and variation within, the likely
Jurassic limestone source (1969, 48-9). Gardeners Compound fabric S2 is a good
example of a subdivision.
The third largest group is the fine micaceous sandstone and chert group (102g;
21.9%), which consists of fabric type SS1 only. It contains large pieces of two types
of rock. One is very fine to fine micaceous sandstone with a grain-size range of quartz
in the rock measuring between 0.06 and 0.25mm. This contrasts with the larger grains
of quartz found in Peacocks Group 2 sandstone which are about 0.4 mm. across with
a ferruginous coating (1969, 46-7). The second rock type is chert which can be
rounded or angular in shape. Therefore, although fabric SS1 is not the same as the
Group 2 fabric, it is most likely that the source for this fabric is from a similar deposit;
micaceous sandstones have been identified in the Lower Old Red Sandstone
(Kellaway and Welch 1948, 14), located approximately 15km northeast of
Glastonbury (Peacock 1969, fig. 2), but the additional presence of chert and the
rounded shape of the chert in many cases suggest that the principal inclusions derive
from a gravel deposit some distance from the primary source.
The smallest (32g; 6.9%), quartz sand group, consists of three very different fabrics
with one sherd representing each fabric. Fabric Q1 is a medium to coarse, gravel-like
mixture of quartz sand, limestone and iron oxides, all measuring 2mm or less across
and each occurring in similar frequency (10%). Fabric Q2 has much more quartz sand
(25%) than limestone (10%) or iron oxides (5%) and the limestone is sandy and
fossiliferous. Fabric Q3 has fewer quartz inclusions than either Q1 or Q2, is
particularly distinctive due to the loss of any calcareous matter which may have been
present (creating a vesicular texture to the fabric), and has rare, large fragments of
chert. All three fabrics derive from similar deposits, and may be naturally-gritted.
Local sources are likely candidates for any of these, particularly due to the limestone
present, but other sources further afield cannot be ruled out due to the relatively
common nature of the inclusions present.
Calcareous Group
C1 coarse, calcite and limestone fabric (*)
Common (20%), moderately-sorted, angular calcite, < 2.5mm, and moderate (10%),
moderately-sorted, subangular to subrounded, recrystallised limestone, < 2.5mm, in a
fine clay matrix containing rare (1-2%), subangular to subrounded quartz, < 0.2mm
Shell Group
S1 very coarse, fossil shell and limestone fabric (*)
Abundant (45-50%), poorly-sorted, subangular to subrounded, fossil shell and
fossiliferous limestone fragments, < 7mm and < 4mm respectively, in a clay matrix
containing rare (1%), subrounded to rounded, opaque iron oxides (probably
magnetite) and sparse (5%), poorly-sorted, rounded clay pellets, < 4mm, which
contain fragments of limestone, < 0.4mm, in them which may be rare (<1%) to
moderate (10%) in frequency
The commonest group comprises necked, barrel-shaped vessels with round (R1; Fig.
00, 1-3) or pointed (R2; Fig. 00, 4) beaded rims, an upright, flat-topped rim (R4; Fig.
00, 7), and a type which was clearly pulled up from the neck (R5; Fig. 00, 5-6). All
four rim types in this group of necked vessels are distinctively short and the vessel
profiles are smooth and without shoulders. This group includes well-known types of
Middle-Late Iron Age vessels found in Somerset. Similar examples have been found
at Meare and Glastonbury Lake Villages (Bulleid and Grey 1917, plate 77; 1948, fig.
3; Orme, et al. 1981, figs. 37, 62 & 2006; 38, 2130; Rouillard 1987, figs. 5.3, P104;
5.4, P124; and 5.8, P63), Dibbles Farm (Morris 1988, figs. 4, 38, 6, 66; and 7, 69),
Cadbury Castle (Woodward 2000, figs. 13, 9, 19, 24, & 28; 14, 9; 15, 17, 19, & 29;
and 16, 15), Ham Hill (Morris 2000, fig. 33, 22, 26, & 30), and on two sites
discovered along the Bowden Reservoir pipeline (Newman and Morris 2001, fig. 5, 1-
4, & 8). Five of the Gardeners Compound vessels appear to have been jars, but at
least two were bowls differentiated solely by the presence of their burnished interior
surfaces (Fig. 00, 2 & 4). Jars may be burnished on the exterior but not on the interior
surface. Burnishing on the interior of a vessel provides a degree of impermeability
which retards the loss of liquids through the vessel wall. Typical examples of internal
burnishing are found on Romano-British open formed, flanged bowls and shallow
dog dishes of Dorset Black Burnished Ware type. Burnishing on the exterior only,
however, keeps moisture out of a closed form vessel, or jar. It seems that during the
later Iron Age period, a necked, barrel-shaped vessel could be made and then finished
to perform either as a jar (unburnished or burnished on the exterior) or as a bowl
(burnished on the interior).
There are two types of convex-profile or ovoid jars that do not have necks or
shoulders and are distinctively closed vessel forms, one with a thick, rounded
incurving rim (R3; Fig. 00, 8) and one with a pointed incurving rim (R6; Fig. 00, 9).
Both are roughly finished; neither is burnished on the exterior or interior and one still
shows the potters finger impression tucked up under the interior rim zone as a result
of manufacture (Fig. 00, 9). The length, width and position of this indentation
suggests that the potter was a slight-built or quite young person and right-handed.
Neckless and shoulderless, ovoid jars may be some of the commonest pots found on
Iron Age sites in Somerset, from the Early Iron Age onwards. Examples have been
found at Glastonbury Lake Village (Bulleid and Grey 1917, plate 75, 11 & fig. 159)
Meare Village West (Orme, et al. 1981, figs. 38, 1395; and 39, 3381), Meare Village
East (Rouillard 1987, figs. 5.4, P101 & P106; and 5.10, P133), Ham Hill (Morris
1987, fig. 3, 37 & 39), Dibbles Farm (Morris 1988, figs. 5, 46, 51-52; 6, 56, 65, 67-
68; and 7, 73), Bowden Reservoir Site 1 (Newman and Morris 2000, fig. 5, 6),
Cadbury Castle (Woodward 2000, figs. 12, 11-13; 13, 10-13, & 20; and 14, 8 & 11),
and South Cadbury Environs Project (Tabor 2002, fig. 4.14, 1004/45). Ovoid jars,
however, have a much earlier genesis in the Late Bronze Age, made throughout the
first millennium BC and earlier.
Decoration
Two decorated sherds from different vessels were recovered. One small, abraded
sherd displays two wide, parallel, tooled lines on a vessel with irregular firing (Fig.
00, 10). It appears that these lines may have been impressed onto an already
burnished vessel as burnish is visible within the gully of the lines. Tooling is the term
used to describe an impressed technique used to create a linear motif which does not
actually cut the surface of the clay but simply pushes it inwards; it is not a carving
technique such as incising. The other sherd displays two narrow, parallel tooled lines
with an additional, single, oblique line creating a triangle motif on a vessel with a
black, burnished exterior (Fig. 00, 11). Both of these fragments of decoration are
typical of the well-known Glastonbury Ware style found on Iron Age sites in the
region (Peacock 1969). These decorated vessels are very distinctive but they are
found much less frequently in assemblages than their fame implies. There are no
examples of Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age or Early Iron Age decorated sherds,
such as those recovered from Ham Hill (Morris 2000), Cadbury Castle (Woodward
2000), or the South Cadbury Environs Project (Tabor 2002), in the Gardeners
Compound collection.
Discussion
The types of vessels identified in the Gardeners Compound collection represent later
rather than earlier Iron Age activity in the absence of any solely diagnostic Early Iron
Age forms and this is supported by the absence of sherds decorated with Early Iron
Age-style finger-tip impressions. The pots are mainly small jars but there are at least
two bowls represented. Sherds from two vessels had been decorated in the
Glastonbury Ware-style. Several of the vessels had been used as cooking pots while
others as containers of liquids or acidic foodstuffs.
The majority of the vessels represented in this collection may have been brought into
the area, probably through trading networks, exchange gatherings, or marriage
alliances based on the likely sources of the different fabric groups. The calcareous
group and the sandstone and chert group, which together make up more than half of
the pottery by weight, derive from deposits of calcite and sandstone typical of the
Mendip Hills which are located more than 7km distance. This is significant because it
is beyond the normal distance most potters are prepared to travel to find suitable clays
but if any of the inclusions were added tempering agents then this acceptable distance
increases to a minimum of 10 km (Arnold 1985, 50-3, fig. 2.5; Morris 1994, 372-3).
The variety of different fabrics is also indicative of a wide resource base amongst
only 42 sherds recovered, there are 12 different fabrics. This range could be the result
of the mixed or redeposited condition of the collection and its uncertain original
archaeological context or contexts but it is also indicative of the special nature of Iron
Age life in the Glastonbury area. Many different sources had been used to make the
pots, and these sources could indicate different potters in the region trading their
wares to the Glastonbury-based residents. In particular, the fine sandstone and chert
fabric pottery found at the Gardeners Compound collection is not the same as
Peacocks Group 2 sandstone fabric. This fabric difference correlates strongly to
differences in form, surface treatment and presence of elaborate decoration on the
Group 2 pottery found at Glastonbury and Meare Lake Villages (Peacock 1969, fig.4).
The Gardeners Compound fabric SS1 was used to make undecorated and roughly
finished pottery that was frequently used as cookpots (Fig. 00, 3, 5 & 9), and it would
be interesting to see if it compared more closely to similarly plain vessels of
sandstone fabric from excavations at Meare Village West 1979 (Orme, et al. 1981,
fig. 37, 62, 777, & 2006).
Glastonbury Abbey Gardeners Compound
GAG08
Iron Age pottery drawings
1
PRN 1006
4
PRN 1007
3
PRN 1005
6
PRN 1033
2
PRN 1 031
9
PRN 1034
10
PRN 1 017
7
PRN 1009
11
PRN 102 1
8
PRN 1008
drawn by 5
E laine L. M orriss PRN 1016
Catalogue of Illustrated Sherds (Fig. 00 - GAG08 Iron Age pottery)
(Context 02, redeposited; PRN, archive Pottery Record Number)
1. Rim, type R1; fabric Q1; 5% of 80mm diameter present; traces of burnish visible
on exterior; oxidised firing on interior and exterior surfaces; PRN 1006.
2. Rim, type R1; fabric C4; less than 5% of rim present; burnished on interior and
exterior surfaces; unoxidised firing throughout; PRN 1031.
3. Rim, type R1; fabric SS1; less than 5% of rim present; roughly wiped on interior
surface; unoxidised firing throughout; burnt residue on interior surface; PRN 1005.
4. Rim, type R2; fabric C2; 5% of 100mm diameter present; burnished on interior
surface; oxidised firing on exterior surface; PRN 1007.
5. Rim, type R5; fabric SS1; 7% of 180mm diameter present; irregularly oxidised
firing on exterior; burnt residue on interior surface; PRN 1016.
6. Rim, type R5; fabric C4; 5% of 120mm diameter present; unoxidised firing
throughout; PRN 1033.
7. Rim, type R4; fabric C2; 5% of 140mm diameter present; irregularly oxidised
firing on exterior surface; soot on exterior surface; PRN 1009.
8. Rim, type R3; fabric 5% of 140mm diameter present; oxidised firing on exterior
surface; PRN 1008.
9. Rim, type R6; fabric SS1; 11% of 120mm diameter present; unoxidised firing
throughout; traces of burnt residue on interior surface; PRN 1034.
10. Decorated body sherd; fabric S2; burnished and tooled parallel lines on exterior;
PRN 1017.
11. Decorated body sherd; fabric C6; burnished and tooled parallel and oblique lines
on exterior surface; PRN 1021.
context qty fabric & weight surface date
02 - 1 rim, hard grey, abundant calcite black rim, pale grey-brown LIA
U/S- & shell temper with grey outer surface, grey-brown
Spoil limestone grits up to 6mm. 49g inner
1 rim, hard, dark grey, limestone brown surfaces, partly LIA
& grit temper. 12g reduced outer surface
1 rim, black, limestone quartz & black surfaces, oxidised LIA
grit temper. 11g patches, wipe marks on
interior surface
1 rim, black, occasional limestone temper. 11g LIA
1 rim, reduced, small limestone & brown surfaces LIA
quartz temper. 10g
1 rim, black, frequent small grey-brown outer surface LIA
limestone temper. 5g
2 black, frequent small limestone paler surfaces LIA
& quartz temper. 9g, 8g
1 black, small quartz temper with light brown outer surface LIA
occasional limestone. 4g
1 grey, small limestone temper, brown surfaces, frequent LIA
voids. 6g surface voids where
limestone had burnt out
4 reduced, limestone & calcite temper, various types. 8g, 4g, 3g, LIA
1g
1 black, quartz & grit temper up black surfaces with brown LIA
to 5mm. 20g patches, ?black concretion
inside
1 hard dark grey, frequent brown sandy surfaces, LIA
limestone temper up to 4mm partly reduced patches
with calcite, quartz & rare grog.
20g
1 hard grey, frequent grey light brown surfaces LIA
limestone temper with some
quartz & grog. 14g
1 dark grey, limestone temper. buff-grey outer surface, LIA
22g rough, reduced inner
surface
1 reduced, limestone temper up to grey-buff outer surface LIA
5mm. 15g
1 brown, limestone & quartz temper. 15g LIA
1 black, limestone temper. 6g brown outer surface LIA
1 black, frequent limestone incised lines on outer LIA
temper. 4g surface
2 reduced, limestone & grit brown surfaces LIA
temper. 5g, 1g
2 reduced, abundant limestone temper with some quartz. 9g. 7g LIA
5 reduced, various types. 21g, reduced surfaces LIA
11g, 7g, 2g, 2g
1 ?base sherd, reduced, frequent red-orange outer surface, ?LIA
calcite & limestone temper up micaceous, buff-brown
to 13mm. 27g inner surface
Fabric Count % Count Weight % Weight
Calcareous Group
C1 4 25
C2 10 101
C3 1 17
C4 5 47
C5 1 27
C6 2 4
sub-total 23 54.8% 221 47.4%
Arnold, D.E. 1985, Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press)
Bailey, J. 1981, A Petrological Study of the Pottery from Meare Village West 1979:
preliminary report, in J.M. Coles (ed), Somerset Levels Papers 7, fiche F1.38-
41. (Exeter: University of Exeter, Somerset Levels Project)
Bulleid, A. and Grey, H.St.G. 1917, The Glastonbury Lake Village, Vol II.
(Glastonbury Antiquarian Society)
Bulleid, A. and Grey, H.St.G. 1948, The Meare Lake Village, Vol. I. (Taunton:
privately printed)
Kellaway, G.A. and Welch, F.B.A. 1948, Bristol and Gloucester District. London:
British Regional Geology, H.M.S.O.
Morris, E.L. 1988, The Iron Age Occupation at Dibbles Farm, Christon, Somerset
Archaeology and Natural History 132, 23-81.
Morris, E.L. 1994, Production and Distribution of Pottery and Salt in Iron Age
Britain: a Review, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60, 371-393.
Morris, E.L. 2000, Prehistoric Pottery, in J.I. McKinley, Excavations at Ham Hill,
Montcute, Somerset 1994 and 1998, Somerset Archaeology and Natural
History 142, 77-137.
Morris, E.L. 2007, Prehistoric Pottery, in C. Gerrard with M. Aston, The Shapwick
Project, Somerset. A Rural Landscape Explored, 565-571. (Leeds: Society of
Medieval Archaeology Monograph 25)
Newman, C. and Morris, E.L., with Bonner, D. 2001, Iron Age and Romano-British
Sites Along the Bowden Reservoir Link Pipeline, South-East Somerset,
Somerset Natural History and Archaeology 143, 1-27.
Orme, B.J., Coles, J.M., Caseldine, A.E., and Bailey, G.N. 1981, Meare Village West
1979, in J.M. Coles (ed), Somerset Levels Papers 7, 12-69. (Exeter: University
of Exeter, Somerset Levels Project)
PCRG 1995, General Policies and Guidelines on the Analysis and Publication of
Later Prehistoric Pottery. (Oxford: Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group
Occasional Papers 1 and 2)
PCRG 1997, General Policies and Guidelines on the Analysis and Publication of
Later Prehistoric Pottery. (Oxford: Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group
Occasional Papers 1 and 2, revised edition)
Peacock, D.P.S. 1969, A Contribution to the Study of Glastonbury Ware from South-
Western Britain, Antiquaries Journal 49, 41-61.
Rouillard, S.E. 1987, The Iron Age Pottery from Meare Village East, in J.M. Coles,
Meare Village East; The Excavations of A. Bulleid and H. St. George Grey,
183-219. (Exeter: Somerset Levels Papers 13)
Tabor, R. (ed) 2002, South Cadbury Environs Project Interim field work report, 1998-
2001. (Bristol: University of Bristol Centre for the Historic Environment)
Woodward, A. 2000, Cadbury 4 to Cadbury 10 revisited, in J.C. Barrett, P.W.M.
Freeman, and A. Woodward, Cadbury Castle, Somerset; The later prehistoric
and early historic archaeology, 28-41. (London: English Heritage
Archaeological Report 20)
Appendix 2: Context List
Context Type Description of Context Interpretation Suggested
No. Date
(Century)
Dimensions of sondage = c.1m deep x From c.1.3m (E-W) top - c.0.4m (E-W)
base x c.1m N-S
01 Deposit Moderately compact, mixed, dark Turf & Topsoil. Late C20th
grey-brown humic clay. From Removed by mini-
c.25cm up to c.35cm thick. digger prior to the
Contained frequent roots, excavation of the
occasional modern plastics. sondage which was
Covered the full extent of the excavated by machine
Gardeners compound. Overlies 02 through 02 - then hand
dug through 03 to 10.
02 Deposit Moderately compact, mixed, Dumped deposit. ?c.1970's -
khaki-brown sand, clay & mortar. ?Possibly the waste c.1980's
Contained abundant mortar / product of either
plaster (some painted), ceramic ?landscaping work or
building materials, frequent MIA ?archaeological
- Late C20th pottery, slate, excavtions within the
occasional Lias & Doulting Glastonbury Abbey
rubble - including architectural precinct.
fragments, metal artefacts up to
late C20th, bottle glass, plastic,
occasional fine roots, rare clay
pipe stems, window glass, flint.
From c.30cm up to c.35cm thick.
Up to 1.3m excavated (E-W).
Covered the full extent of the
Gardeners compound. Underlies
01. Overlies 03
Note 2 :- Finds from (02) - Finds were collected from site, sondage & (placed in a separate location
as) spoil, then examined. Contained super abundant ceramic tiles - mostly encaustic floor tiles
which were separated and stored within the Gardeners compound. Architectural fragments were
also separated & deposited in the same location.
03 Deposit Moderately compact, dark grey Buried cultivated soil. C19-20th
humic clay. Contained frequent Top layer of turf &
fine roots, moderate amounts of topsoil prior to the
C18-20th pottery & ceramic deposition of 02 in the
building materials, Fe, occasional late C20th.
window & bottle glass, slate,
charcoal. 7-10cm thick. c.50cm
exposed E-W. Underlies 02.
Overlies 04
04 Deposit Soft, sandy, light grey-brown silty Buried soil. ?Possibly a C19-20th
clay. Contained quite frequent temporary working
small angular stone up to 1cm & surface. Gritty, stony
grits, post-Medieval ceramic surface made 04 easily
building materials, occasional distinguishable from
C18-20th pottery, Fe, slate, coal, 03. 1 x Tor Burr rubble
cinder, fine roots. c.4cm thick. (c.8cm) through 03, 04
c.50cm exposed E-W. Underlies & 05 demonstrates the
03. Overlies 04 continuity of the three
deposits.
Context Type Description of Context Interpretation Suggested
No. Date
(Century)
05 Deposit Soft, sandy, light grey-brown silty Buried soil. C19-20th
clay. Contained occasional C18-
20th ceramic building materials,
small coal, charcoal, & mortar
lumps, small slate fragments, clay
pipe fragments, fine roots. From
5cm - 7cm thick. c.50cm exposed
E-W. Underlies 04. Overlies 06
06 Deposit Moderately compacted, grey-brown sandy clay. Contained ?19th
frequent stiff-yellow Lias clay lenses & lumps up to c.25cm
(re-deposited natural) - especially towards the base of the
deposit. Also contained moderate amounts of post-Medieval
ceramic building materials, occasional medieval - C18-20th
pottery, Fe, bone, small mortar & coal / cinder lumps, clay
pipe fragments, rare fine roots, 1 x Flint flake. From 5cm -
7cm thick. c.50cm exposed E-W. Underlies 05. Overlies 07
Modern
2 1 x rim & 1 x body sherd, factory 19-
white ware. 7g, 3g 20th
1 base frag, porcelain. 5g 19-
20th
U/S - West Spoil Heaps - 13/01/2009
U/S 1 handle, hard brown glaze ?15-17th 2 x Fe slag
West oxidised, sandy, with dark lumps. 261g,
Spoil grey core. 59g green spots 130g
Heaps - 1 large rim, clear glaze on 17- 1 x clay pipe
13/01/0 oxidised, grey inner surface 19th stem. discarded.
9 core. 44g 3g
1 oxidised. 63g inner brown 18-
glaze 19th
2 1 x rim + 1 x discarded 19-
body sherd, blue 20th
transfer ware.
10g, 8g
1 base frag, hard shiny brown 19-
oxidised. 88g glaze with iron 20th
spots inside
1 stoneware, off- light brown 19-
white. 9g outer surface, 20th
salt glaze
inside & out
2 factory white discarded 19-
ware. 19g, 5g 20th
U/S - West Spoil Heaps - 17/02/2009
U/S- 1 oxidised, sandy, clear glaze out, 13- Ceramic Tile Glass
West grey core. 8g spots of green 14th
Spoil glaze
Heaps - 1 hard, grey, oxidised inner 13- 1 ?ceramic roof tile 1 x almost
17/02/2 sandy, fine surface, dull 15th frag, grey fabric complete (brake
009 quartz & black green & light with voids, on neck), clear
grit temper. 16g brown glaze oxidised lower glass bottle,
out surfaces with traces moulded, base
of white mortar. stamp
abraded. 6g. ?C13- "354/C.T.G/2".
15th 288g.
C19-20th
context {______ pottery____________________} {_building materials } miscellaneous
n fabric & surface centu n description
o weight ry o
U/S- 1 hard, grey, oxidised sandy 13- 1 ceramic roof tile 2 x joining base
West sandy. 5g surfaces, 15th frag, reduced fabric frags, bottle
Spoil mottled clear above, oxidised glass, brown,
Heaps - & khaki green fabric below, green moulded, letters
17/02/2 glaze out & orange glaze. on side - base
009 27g. ?C16-17th reads
"UNITED". 41g,
20g. C19-20th
1 rim frag, hard brown 15- 1 ?floor tile frag, red 1 x base frag,
grey, fine grit & surfaces, clear 16th - brown fabric, bottle glass,
occasional fine glaze in frequent white & green, moulded
limestone grey grit temper, letters on base &
temper. 27g black surfaces. side. 84g.
24g. ?C19-20th C19-20th
9 oxidised, various various brown, 16- Plaster 1 x green bottle
types. 75g orange & 18th glass sherd. 20g.
green glaze C19-20th
2 rims, same pot, green outer 19- 1 white wall plaster 1 x green bottle
fine china. 11g surface 20th frag. 8g glass sherd,
patinated. 16g.
Post-Medieval
1 rim frag, factory pink outer 19- Stone 1 x clear vessel
white ware. 9g surface 20th glass sherd. 14g.
Post-Medieval
1 rim frag, pale clear glaze 19- 1 carved ?Doulting Fe
grey stoneware. 20th stone frag, traces of
13g red paint. 41g.
Medieval
1 base / body frag, factory white 19- Glass 2 x joining,
ware, cup. 30g 20th Complete Fe
spur. 73g. n.d
1 base / body frag, grey - buff 19- 1 blue ?window glass 1 x large Fe nail,
hard grey inner surface, 20th sherd, patinated. flat sides. 28g.
stoneware, 51g brown out 4g. ?Medieval Post-Medieval
1 factory white pale yellow 19- 3 x Fe slag frags.
ware. 4g surfaces 20th 252g
1 white. 10g transfer print - 19- Miscellaneo
leaves inside, 20th
text out
us
3 factory white wares, various types. 19-20th 1 x clay pipe
18g stem frag.
discarded. 3g
2 blue transfer wares, various types. 19- 1 x one pence
7g 20th piece. discarded.
3g. 1977
context {______ pottery____________________} {_building materials } miscellaneous
n fabric & surface centu n description
o weight ry o
( 02 ) - U/ S - Spoil Heaps - 17/02/2009
( 02 ) 1 pale orange, shiny green 16-17th 1 x Fe strip frag.
U/S sandy. 3g glaze on outer disc. 9g
Spoil - surface
17/02/0 1 x base frag,
9 vessel glass, light
green. 55g,
?Post-Medieval
Finds from the ceramic tile collection - recorded 19/03/10
02 - 2 joining sherds, oxidised ?10th Wasters
U/S- ?plate or ?lid surfaces, or
Spoil fragment, brown & light ?IA
Nov. 08 reduced, dark brown with
- from grey, abundant reduced
ceramic limestone temper patches, grass
tile with brown grit marks on 1 x
collecti & orange-brown surface
on - ?grog inclusions.
recorde Rim or edge =
d 25g, body = 19g
19/03/1 1 rectangular floor tile, waster - warped,
0 grey fabric, abundant limestone temper,
brown surfaces, black glaze, off-white
mortar lumps adhering, c.30mm thick x
c.42mm wide x c.130mm long. 339g.
medieval
1 Rim, sandy oxidised 12-
reduced, dark & orange sandy 13th
pale grey core surfaces
with pale
margins. 28g
1 reduced, grey, pale oxidised 13- 1 rectangular floor tile, waster, grey
limestone temper inner surface, 15th fabric, abundant limestone temper up to
up to 3mm. 5g mottled khaki 15mm, black & brown surfaces, black
green glaze glaze, c.28mm thick x c.43mm wide x
with iron spots c.136mm long. 295g. medieval
outside
1 hard pale grey. oxidised 14- 1 ceramic roof tile fragment, waster,
23g surfaces, 16th hard oxidised fabric, abundant
patchy green limestone temper, black glaze. c.12mm
glaze outside, thick. 64g. medieval
green glaze
inside with
unglazed
patches, patch
of grey cement
adhering
context {______ pottery____________________} {_building materials } miscellaneous
n fabric & surface centu n description
o weight ry o
02 - 1 Rim, fine grey oxidised 15- 1 thin ceramic roof tile fragment, waster,
U/S- sandy, frequent orange 16th oxidised fabric, occasional limestone
Spoil quartz temper up surfaces, temper up to 5mm, black glaze.
Nov. 08 to 3mm with applied strip c.12mm thick. 53g. medieval
- from some grog & out with
ceramic orange grits. 12g thumbed
tile impressions
collecti 1 hard grey sandy, smooth 15- Roof Tiles
on - occasional small oxidised inner 16th
recorde grey grit temper. surface -
d 39g slightly
19/03/1 micaceous,
0 black glaze
outside,
broken handle
stub outside
2 thin ceramic roof tile fragments,
0 various mostly reduced fabrics, various
glazes. 1011g. medieval - post-med
9 Rims, bases & green, orange 17- 1 wall plaster fragment, pale off-white-
body sherds, & brown 19th grey lime mortar with lime,
hard sandy glazes, various 1 x flat face - white washed - with
oxidised, various types traces of red paint. up to c.12mm thick.
types. 252g 16g. probably medieval