[

Scale 1 Scale 2 8.00 Scale 36.00 Scale 4 Scale 5 Scale 6

10.00 4.00 2.00 0.00

Criterion 12 Coherent well- Overall well- An Executive A descriptive Very brief No Executive
presented presented Executive Summary is Executive attempt at an Summary or
10% Executive Summary that presented which Summary is Executive Inadequate
Summary that articulates the key highlights most provided. Some Summary. May information
Executive clearly articulates features of the of the key aspects of the be more an provided.
Summary the key features of submission including features of the key features of Introduction
Setting of the submission recommendations submission. the submission than a summary.
Context. including with rationale. Effective may be missing. No inclusion of
recommendations Overall good recommendation Referencing is recommendation
with rationale. Fully referencing. Sets the s are provided undertaken but s. No in-text
referenced. submission in but these are not complete and referencing.
Sets the context. descriptive in the context of
submission firmly places. Good the assignment
in context. referencing. Sets may not be clear.
the submission
in context.
Criterion 21 Demonstrates a Demonstrates a Demonstrates an Demonstrates There is a No ability to
very good ability to good ability to ability to some ability to limited understand the
10% understand the understand the basic understand the understand the understanding basic notions of
basic notions of notions of human basic notions of basic notions of of the basic human behaviour
Provide human behaviour behaviour in human human behaviour notions of in organisations.
evidences of in organisations. organisations behaviour in in organisations. human Lack of
[

understanding Interrelationships Appropriate organisations. Mostly behaviour in understanding of

of the basic are clearly frameworks and Whilst mostly descriptive in organisations the key issues.
notions of developed and models are used for analytical, Some nature. Limited
human illustrated. the analysis. A range parts of the application to
behaviour in Implications are of implications for submission are organisations. .
organisation fully explored. the organisation are descriptive in
explored. nature.

Criterion 3 1 Demonstrates the Demonstrates the Demonstrates an Demonstrates Personal views, No personal view
ability to express ability to express ability to express some ability to on how Lack of
10% clearly a personal personal view on a personal view express a organisations understanding of
view on how and how organisations on how personal view on exist and their the key issues.
Express why organisations exist and their organisations how functions,
clearly a exist and their functions. exist and their organisations limited. Little
personal view functions. Appropriate functions. Whilst exist and their understanding
on how and Interrelationships frameworks and mostly functions. Mostly demonstrated or
why are fully developed models are used for analytical, some descriptive in application to an
organisations and illustrated. the analysis. A range parts of the nature. organisation.
exist and their Implications are of implications for submission are
functions. extensively the organisation are descriptive in
explored. explored. nature.

Criterion 4 1 Demonstrates a Demonstrates a very Demonstrates a Demonstrates Very limited Inadequate

comprehensive good level of good level of some knowledge knowledge and information
10% knowledge and knowledge and knowledge and and understanding provided. Lack of
understanding of understanding of the understanding of understanding of of the relevant understanding of
[

Internal relevant theory in relevant theory in relevant theory the relevant theory in basic issues.
Environment: response to the response to the in response to theory in response to the
Demonstrates assignment brief. assignment brief. the assignment response to the assignment
knowledge brief. assignment brief. brief.
and
understanding
of the
appropriate
models,
theories and
frameworks
Criterion 5 1 Demonstrates Demonstrates very Demonstrates Demonstrates Limited abilities No abilities to
excellent abilities good abilities to good abilities to some abilities to to debate in a debate in a
10% to debate in a debate in a debate in a debate in a challenging, challenging,
Debate in a challenging, challenging, challenging, challenging, questioning and questioning and
challenging, questioning and questioning and questioning and questioning and critical way on critical way on
questioning critical way on critical way on critical way on critical way on issues related to issues related to
and critical issues related to issues related to issues related to issues related to human human behaviour
perspective on human behaviour human behaviour at human human behaviour behaviour at at work
issues related at work. work behaviour at at work work
to human work
behaviour at
work.
Criterion 6 1 Very good ability to A good ability to Good overall Some application Unsubstantiated Invalid
apply concepts apply concepts application of of relevant application of application of
10% discussed in class discussed in class to concepts concepts concepts concepts
[

Apply to the analysis of the analysis of discussed in discussed in discussed in discussed in

concepts simple case studies simple case studies class to the class to the class to the class. Lack of
discussed in or common or common analysis of analysis of analysis of information base
class to the situations in the situations in the simple case simple case simple case
analysis of workplace. workplace. studies or studies or studies or
simple case Coherent and Recommendations common common common
studies or consistent analysis, well defined and situations in the situations in the situations in the
common supported by supported by workplace. There workplace. There workplace.
situations in theoretical theoretical and is limited linkage is some linkage There is no
the workplace concepts and practical evidence. to preceding to preceding linkage to
practical evidence. There is some material in the material in the preceding
Clearly links linkage to preceding assignment. assignment. material in the
recommendations material stated in assignment.
to preceding the assignment.
material stated in
the assignment.

Criterion 7 1 Demonstrates the Demonstrates the There is some Some limited There are very There are no
10% ability to research ability to research evidence of research limited connections
the subject to a the subject to a exploring the undertaken. The connections developed.
Demonstrate consistently high consistently good subject area sources are developed Inadequate
the ability to standard. Has used standard. Has used a beyond the usually between the information base
conduct a wide range of variety of relevant, standard texts indicative/directe data provided
independent relevant, validated reliable and outlined in the d reading. Some and the
research at an and reliable validated sources. module guide . sources may not strategic
appropriate sources beyond the be suitable in approach taken
[

level. sources stated terms of by the

within the module academic/profess organisation.
guide. ional levels,
reliability and
validity.
Criterion 8 1 Demonstrates an Demonstrates Recognises that Some reference Little recognition Does not
10% understanding of recognition of there are to and or relatedness to recognise or
multiple multiple alternative understanding of different relate to different
Flexibility and perspectives and perspectives which perspectives different perspectives. perspectives.
Perspectives through these can may influence/affect which can perspectives, but
develop a personal a personal point of influence/affect limited
point of view. view. a personal point application
of view.
Criterion 91 A very detailed and A detailed and The majority of A fair response A limited Very limited or
10% thorough approach. thorough approach. the requirements to answering response to the non-existent
Coverage of Highly relevant and Relevant and well- of the most of the assignment response to the
Assignment well-constructed constructed assignment brief requirements of brief. Few of the assignment brief.
Requirements. response to all the response to have been the assignment requirements of Very few of the
requirements of the all/majority of the addressed. brief.Some the assignment requirements of
assignment brief. requirements of the aspects may not brief addressed. the assignment
assignment brief. have been brief addressed.
addressed fully This may be
expressed as a
significantly
reduced word
count.
Criterion 10 1 Very fluent writing A detailed and Writing style The overall The overall and Significant
[

style. Engaging to thorough approach. generally fluent. meaning can specific meaning problems with
10% read. Spelling, Relevant and well- Spelling, generally be of the writing is structure and
grammar and constructed grammar and understood. unclear. There accuracy in
Clarity of punctuation response to punctuation However the are consistent expression. Very
expression accurate. Both in- all/majority of the generally quality of the grammatical and difficult to follow
(accuracy, text citations and requirements of the accurate. A writing is spelling errors and understand.
spelling, the reference list assignment brief. reasonable level variable. There throughout the In-text citations
grammar, are consistently of accuracy in are some errors submission. In- are absent.
punctuation) accurate and in line terms of both in- in spelling, text citations, Reference list
and reference with the Harvard text citations grammar and reference list are either absent or
format and the punctuation. either absent or doesnt conform
reference list is There is an unsystematic to Harvard
presented. attempt to (including not in format. A lack of
Generally provide both in- Harvard format). regard for
conforms to the text citations and academic
Harvard format. a reference list conventions
A few minor within the
errors Harvard format.
There may be
several errors in
the referencing.