Sunteți pe pagina 1din 4

Timothy Baldwin – The State of Secession

The State of Secession

Author: Timothy Baldwin, JD


Date: Mon, Jul 5, 2010
http://libertydefenseleague.com/2010/07/05/the-state-of-secession/

Partly due to the efforts of the 2009 version of “Let a Thousand Nations Bloom,” I started a
small service, SecessionNews.com, described by some as a “Drudge Report” of secession. For
a year now, I have reviewed each day’s relevant and significant (at least, in my opinion)
secession-related articles and news reports. In doing so, I have read well over 1,000 online
articles and posted excerpts from more than 500 of those that I believed would be of value
and benefit to anyone interested in the topic.

With a year’s worth of reading articles and thousands of their related comments, I have
acquired some instinct as to the mood of the country on the idea of seceding from an all-too-
intrusive and abusive federal government. Therefore, after a year of being fully immersed in
the subject, I offer my modest view on the current state of secession in these not-so-united
States of America.

Before getting to the meat of it, I’ll say it straight away: It has not been a good year for the
notion of secession. One might think that due to the calamity of the current socialist
movement in Washington, the public would be clamoring for workable solutions—say,
withdrawing from such government—but so far, the public reaction has been more
consternation than action.

That’s not to say there haven’t been some very positive and noteworthy developments. Chief
among them are the slate of secessionist candidates running for statewide offices in Vermont.
While we must wait until November to gauge the support of Vermonters for an independent
and free Vermont, it would be an upset of major proportions should any of them win. [Our
hope is that they at least make a respectable run of it.]

Another positive development of significance has been the advancement of secession


scholarship by the likes of Russell Longcore (DumpDC.com) and Timothy Baldwin
(LibertyDefenseLeague.com). Their thoughtful insights and prolific writing on the subject
have lifted the level of discourse and advanced the cause with common sense and logic. If you
spend much time at all pursuing the blogs where discussions of secession are crackling, you
often will find little common sense or logic; therefore, the frequent reflective opines from
Longcore and Baldwin become noteworthy. That is not to say, however, that a number of
others have not written thoughtfully and well on the subject, too.

On the national stage, economist and modern thinker Walter Williams did speak favorably of
secession to a huge radio audience when he filled in for Rush Limbaugh a month or so ago.
While many like me hold the reasoned opinions of Williams in higher esteem than
Limbaugh’s, he doesn’t have the same cachet, doesn’t garner the same attention, so his
refreshing comments went largely unnoticed by the media.

Page 1 of 4
Timothy Baldwin – The State of Secession

The same can be said for Judge Andrew Napolitano’s fearless defense of both secession and
nullification on his Fox Business show as well as when he fills in for Glenn Beck.
Unfortunately, the likes of Limbaugh, Beck, and Hannity are much too comfortable with their
preeminence to risk the blowback that secessionist talk would bring. And that, my friends,
epitomizes the current state of secession in these un-united States: It’s just much too hot of an
issue for the politically timid to handle. Talk of withdrawing from the Compact in the
presence of politicians and media elites is akin to raising the Confederate battle flag at an
NAACP meeting.

This makes it quite significant that, while not directly secession-related, the idea of
nullification has experienced such a truly remarkable rise in acceptance—and application. A
growing number of states are now in various stages of approving state sovereignty bills,
effectively nullifying a number of federal encroachments, including ObamaCare, medical
marijuana, federal gun laws, and the REAL ID Act. The implication of this movement cannot
be overstated, since it re-legitimizes the long-forgotten sovereign authority of the states.
Public approval of something that, until recently, could have been equated to “heresy” means
nullification could very well be the first step to the public’s acceptance of its first cousin,
secession, as another valid option to blunt an abusive federal government. The public need
not be convinced of the necessity of full withdrawal from the Union, mind you. Just the threat
of it might be all that’s needed.

Perhaps my pessimistic view is clouded by the contrast I routinely see with secessionist
movements bubbling up in one foreign country after another. This past year has seen many
areas outside the United States openly debate and consider the option of seceding. Currently,
nearly 50 developed and undeveloped countries throughout the world have active secessionist
movements, and surprisingly, in the most substantial cases, the United States government
generally supports those wanting to secede.

The most amazing contrast exists between the attitudes of the citizenry in third-world and
first-world countries. The concept of withdrawing from an oppressive government is accepted
by the public in the less developed countries, whereas the “sophisticated” public here in the
United States deems secession to be unconstitutional at best and even treasonous by many,
demanding that the people remain shackled to their government, no matter how tyrannical it
may become.

Yet many Americans feel increasingly oppressed by their government, as witnessed by their
ongoing gatherings of protest, waving their “Don’t Tread on Me” flags. One of these rallies
brought on perhaps the most earthshaking event of the past year, when some in the crowd
began shouting “Secede,” and Texas Governor Rick Perry responded, “We’ve got a great
union. There’s absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their
nose at the American people, you know, who knows what might come out of that.”

At first, one might think this was a positive development for the idea of secession—a governor
supposedly egging on his state to secede. But in reality, the reaction to Perry’s words turned
out to be a setback for the public’s acceptance of this most sovereign right. First, the governor
didn’t call for secession, and actually praised the Union, saying, “There’s absolutely no reason
to dissolve it.” Granted, he did seem to accept the right of Texas to secede (a momentous
statement for a governor to make), even though he didn’t actually say that secession was an
absolute right.

Page 2 of 4
Timothy Baldwin – The State of Secession

This rather innocuous statement resulted in a tsunami of negative reaction that still resonates
today. Virtually every article related to Governor Perry mentioned something akin to,
“Governor Perry called for secession during….” The result of this overreaction was to strike
fear into any and all politicians whenever the subject of withdrawing from the Union was
broached. It’s as if secession is now the new “third rail” of politics, never to be mentioned,
much less supported.

The problem with secession in this country is the widespread ignorance of the public on the
right to secede. This fact was reinforced just the other day when a Rasmussen poll reported
that only 18% of the public believed a state had the right to secede. A year ago, according to a
Zogby poll, one-third of the public believed a state had that right. It wasn’t that they were
asked if their state should secede, just if they had the right to do so—a very disappointing
indictment of the American education system.

Here in Charleston, where I write these words only a few blocks from where South Carolina
seceded in 1860, great fear gripped the city’s timid and weak leadership this year when it
came to proposals for memorializing the sesquicentennial of perhaps the most significant
event in this city’s history—approving the Ordinance of Secession. It all began when a group
wanted to establish a memorial to that event and to those that signed the ordinance, but no
official could be found with the courage to back the idea.

Yet, the top contender for the biggest disappointment of the year is the Tea Party movement.
These good folks are sincere, but they have misplaced ideas as to the best solution for
tyrannical government. Somehow, they have convinced themselves that sending “better”
politicians into the quagmire of corruption called Washington will solve our problems. Not
only do they shun workable solutions such as nullification and secession, but they actively
disparage such Founder-like efforts. An example of such can be found on the Austin Tea Party
website where they proudly proclaim, “We do not support secession.”

Despite such negative developments, I do remain positive about the outlook for the coming
year. As the nullification movement gains strength, we may benefit from their coattails. As the
public becomes more aware of the sovereign rights and authority of our states, they could also
become more accepting of the sovereign right of a state to withdraw from a Compact that has
been repeatedly violated by the federal government.

Those who are already in the ranks of the sovereign-rights advocates can help advance the
cause of secession. It is simple, only takes a few minutes of time, and could actually be great
fun. Here’s how: When you finish reading an article supporting or rejecting the idea of
secession, become a part of the conversation. Endorse the informed. Correct the clueless. If
enough of us do this, the public just might become aware of the duty that their state has to
reject an abusive and tyrannical government. Perhaps then, next year’s report on “The State
of Secession” will have a few more victories to celebrate.

Timothy_Baldwin - who has written 109 posts on Liberty Defense League.

Timothy Baldwin is an attorney from Pensacola, FL, who received his B.A. degree at the
University of West Florida and graduated from Cumberland School of Law at Samford

Page 3 of 4
Timothy Baldwin – The State of Secession

University in Birmingham, AL. After having received his Juris Doctorate degree from
Cumberland, Baldwin became a Felony Prosecutor in the 1st District of Florida. In 2006, he
started his own law practice, where he created specialized legal services entirely for property
management companies. Tim is a prolific writer/columnist and writes for numerous
publications, including The New American magazine. Tim is also an articulate speaker
relevant to freedom’s issues. Tim is an author of legal and political articles, as well as his
latest book, Freedom For A Change (published by Agrapha Publishing). Baldwin is involved in
important state sovereignty movement issues, including being co-counsel in the federal
litigation in Montana involving the Firearms Freedom Act.

Web site: http://secessionuniversity.com/

E-mail address: tim@LibertyDefenseLeague.com

###

Page 4 of 4

S-ar putea să vă placă și