Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
VINES
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND
The feasibility of using coral detritus as concrete ag-
gregate was investigated during a technical aid Between 1972 and 1975 cement was imported into
program conducted by the Australian Government in Western Samoa at the rate of 10 to 12 kt per year. At
Western Samoa. Quality of rock materials, reliability current rates this would cost more than WS$500 000
of the supply system and production economics have (about A$600 000), a severe charge on foreign ex-
imposed severe restraints to meeting the fast grow- change earnings. This amount of cement would re-
ing demand for aggregates. The presence of abun- quire 50 to 60 kt of aggregate for full and efficient
dant supplies of easily won lagoon detritus prompted use, an unlikely prospect from observations of both
efforts to define the limitations of coral as a replace- aggregate production and concreting practice at the
ment for rock aggregates. It was found that concrete commencement of the project in 1975. The generally
suitable for most purposes could be made low level of concrete technology and the rapidly ris-
economically with coral sand combined with coarse ing price of cement indicated that large economies of
rock aggregate. Unusual properties were revealed by foreign exchange were possible.
the testing of samples from trial mixes: very high total
water contents were required for acceptable
workability; higher setting temperatures than normal Aggregates were obtained either by crushing
were measured; concrete densities were found to be quarried lava rock or from river and beach volcanic
unusually low; concrete porosity was unusually high. rock detritus. The latter are variably-graded sand and
For certain applications reduced durability properties gravel deposits in the short tidal sections of a few
are inferred, and some limitations are suggested to torrential streams and on beaches close to their
the use of coral in concrete. mouths. They are available only in limited quantities
and mostly at some distance from Apia, the principal
market. The mode of occurrence of lava and other
Reference: Aust. Rd Res. 1 2(1), pp. 17-28.
ejecta, which form the country, makes quarrying a
difficult task: lava flows are generally thin, interlain
with ash and scoria, and contain open-jointed and
INTRODUCTION vesicular rock of poor soundness. Indeed, quarrying
posed so many problems that it was common to
resort to the crushing of manually-collected boulders
In early 1975 a five-year bilateral technical develop- from the countryside.
ment program was initiated by the Governments of
Australia and Western Samoa to assist in upgrading
Because of the basic importance of rock aggreg-
and extending the road system of the latter country.
ate for road works and concrete, high priority was
The project aimed at modernising and rationalising
given to establishing a large permanent centralised
the Public Works Department's (PWD) equipment
quarry of high quality rock at an early stage of the
fleet, establishing workshop facilities, spare parts
project. This work was particularly successful,
store and materials laboratory, and training PWD per-
resulting in the production of coarse aggregate of
sonnel in effective work techniques. The Snowy
fresh, dense and sound dolerite from a large hy-
Mountains Engineering Corporation was commis-
pabyssal deposit at Alafua near Apia (Vines and
sioned by the Australian Development Assistance
Falconer 1980).
Agency (now known as Australian Development
Assistance Bureau) to plan and direct the work.
The Alafua quarry rock was not suitable for
economical processing for sand because of its
Descriptions of the project and experience with micro-crystalline nature, freshness and hardness.
the use of coral and volcanic materials for road con- The only alternatives available were:
struction are given elsewhere (Vines and Falconer (a) beach and river deposits of volcanic alluvium,
1980). This paper describes laboratory and field ex-
perience with the use of coral aggregates in con- (b) crushed lava rock, and
crete during the course of the project. (c) coral detritus.
Early in 1976, a cutter suction dredge which had with the added mixing water. Concrete curing was by
been rebuilt began stockpiling coral detritus at Apia immersion in a water tank, with the temperature vary-
for use in road pavements and fills. The operation was ing between 23 and 26C. The cylinders were tested
rapid and economical so that reliable supplies of an at ages of 1, 3, 7, 28 and 90 days in a manually-oper-
abundant and cheap material were assured. As it ap- ated 100 t compression testing machine. The cement
peared that another quarry would be required in soft used was nearly all of Japanese origin, but of various
lava rocks for crushed sand production, it was brands and ages. However, the same cement was
decided that a program of testing should be under- used throughout any one series of tests.
taken to determine the limitations of coral in con-
crete. It should be emphasised that this program was
Run-of-stockpile materials were used and
not aimed at basic research though the test results
usually proportioned approximately to give enough
prompted much interest in the properties of coral
sand for a reasonably plastic mix without requiring
concrete. The then-existing quality and cost of sand
excessive mixing water. Considering the low state of
for concrete and the intermittency of supply deter-
technology it was thought that close control of ag-
mined that significant benefits could be derived even gregate gradation would be unlikely for some years,
if only minor usage of coral could be made. and that a practical attitude must be maintained dur-
ing the laboratory investigations. It should be noted
LABORATORY CONCRETE TRIALS that the cost of cement is highly dependent on energy
costs, shipping freights and inflation in overseas
GENERAL countries, all of which are unstable and rising rapidly.
Thus the objects were to make savings in foreign ex-
The first step in the investigation program was to change rather than local costs which are relatively
compare the properties and cost of concretes made stable. However, the low cost and reliability of supply
with coral sand and crushed lava sand. Following of coral also had the effect of lowering local costs.
this, mix design charts were developed and further in-
vestigation of interesting and unusual features of the
Fig. 1 shows the average gradation of coral
earlier results carried out.
detritus from 41 samples taken from dredge
Trial mixes of concrete were made in the stockpiles.
laboratory, from which 150 mm diameter by 300 mm SERIES I
cylinders were made. Proportioning of coarse ag-
gregate, sand and cement was by accurate weight This series compared concrete made of coral sand
measurements of dry materials. Residual water within with that made with crushed lava sand. Alafua coarse
the coarse aggregate and sand was accounted for aggregate passing 22 mm was used in both types.
80 1 111
I MINIMWI I
11M=WIIIIM
MIIIIIAPIIIIMEME1111111=11
70 I I I 1I IFIErnillifilir
I I
i Ii INr I
60 MN I
Fig. 1 Average gradation of coral detritus from 41 samples taken from dredge stockpiles
The aggregates were proportioned to similar com- ratios. Furthermore, the similar gradation of com-
bined gradings to fit within the U.K. Transport and bined aggregates by weight does not necessarily
Road Research Laboratory (1947) 'ideal' grading give validly comparable conditions when using
curves. No attempt was made to optimise each grad- materials of different specific gravity, particle shape,
ing and it became clear that results from each were etc. It was decided that future comparisons would be
not strictly comparable. However, the results were based on concrete of similar cement content and
indicative of several interesting features. It was found workability, with aggregates combined to give an ap-
that: proximate balance of good workability and low water
(a) coral sand contributed more plasticity to a mix content.
than crushed lava sand;
(b) coral sand required about 280 L of water to 1 m3 SERIES II
of concrete, as compared to 250 L for the lava
sand, for a slump of about 40 mm, irrespective of A few tests were made with various ratios by weight
cement content; of sand to total aggregate before it was decided that
(c) concrete density was about 130 kg/m3 less at about 40 per cent of coral sand to total aggregate
2.370 t/m3 when using coral; was close to the optimum requirement. Series II was
(d) strength at 28 days was higher for coral sand then undertaken to determine mix design data.
despite much higher total water-cement ratios;
and
(e) lower cement contents per unit volume of con- This series used coral sand passing 4.75 mm and
crete were required when using coral, for a given crushed lava aggregate, passing 22 mm, the most
workability and strength. This reflected the readily available materials at the time, with various
coarse grading of the crushed lava sand, and did amounts of cement ranging from 260 to 410 kg/m,of
not indicate that coral, per se, contributes concrete and with slumps of 25, 75 and 150 mm. The
towards better strength. results are shown in Table I and Fig. 2.
The tests indicated that good concrete could be
made with coral sand. The following points were noted.
The high water absorption and low specific gra- (a) For concrete with 75 mm slump, 320 L of
vity of coral make it difficult to compare concretes on water/m3 of concrete were required; this is 32
the basis of water-cement and aggregate-cement per cent of the fresh concrete volume.
7.0
c7) 6.0
E
U
CO
rr
5.0
4.0
50 50
Tested under standard
conditions at p 1 day
45 45
Cylinder Strength at 28 days (MPa )
3 days
O 7 days
40 40
28 days
+ 91 days
0 35 35
2 O`5
ck4<s''
I 30 '15) c5C) `s>oc
30 ,s
_c o
cs 25
25
Ntt
cn O
20 20
15 15
10 O
10
0 I I
0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 300 350 400
Total Water-Cement
Cement Content (kg/m3 )
Fig. 2 Test results of Series II mixes
TABLE I
370 320 1 1 2 3 1
139 4.40 0.86 80 2.32 42.1 28.1 17.2 24.4 26.5 31.8 30.8 Trial Mixes at 70 to 90 mm slump.
16.0 13.8
Unwashed sand. All mixes gave good
353 317 1 1 2 3 1
140 4.70 0.90 90 2.33 42.7 28.5 17.1 21.7 25.4 28.5 29.5 workability but tended to stiffen
15.2 13.6
quickly. Plasticity was excessive at
337 320 1 3 3 1
143 5.00 0.95 90 2.34 43.2 28.8 15.7 22.3 27.5 27.9 low aggregate-cement ratios.
14.4 13.6
Optimum sand content expected to vary
319 319 1 3 3 1
145 5.30 1.00 75 2.32 43.6 29.0 13.5 21.7 24.9 26.6 from 37 to 42% with increasing
13.7 13.7
aggregate-cement ratio. No aggregate
305 308 1 1 2 3 1
146 5.60 1.01 80 2.32 44.2 29.4 14.9 20.0 21.8 25.9 28.1 segregation or bleeding.
13.1 13.3
290 319 1 1 2 3 1
149 5.90 1.10 75 2.32 44.3 29.5 11.2 17.0 18.2 21.0 23.9
12.5 13.7
276 318 1 1 2 2 1
150 6.18 1.15 70 2.31 44.5 29.7 10.2 17.2 16.8 19.5 22.5
12.0 13.8
262 319 1 1 2 3 1
110 6.62 1.22 80 2.31 44.8 30.1 7.9 11.9 14.4 17.6 22.1
11.3 13.8
289 306 1 1 2 3
167 6.00 1.06 25 2.33 44.7 29.8 13.1 18.4 20.3 25.6 Trail mixes at 25 mm slump.
12.4 13.1
All mixes gave excessive plasticity.
337 305 1 1 1 2
168 5.00 0.91 25 2.33 43.4 29.0 18.2 25.2 26.0 31.5
14.5 13.1
408 304 1 1 2 2
169 4.00 0.75 25 2.34 41.8 27.8 24.9 25.6 31.8 37.4
17.4 13.0
392 346 1 2 2 1
157 3.97 0.88 150 2.29 43.0 24.8 16.1 27.6 32.3 33.1 Trial mixes at 140 mm to 150 mm
17.1 15.1
slump. All mixes gave good
375 337 1 1 2 1
158 4.20 0.90 150 2.29 41.3 27.6 15.2 24.2 26.3 30.2 workability with moderate to high
16.4 14.7
plasticity.
270 339 1 2 3
165 6.20 1.25 150 2.28 44.0 29.3 11.4 13.7 14.2
11.8 14.9
318 337 2 3 1
166 5.20 1.06 140 2.31 43.0 28.6 18.4 22.3 24.3
13.8 14.6
1,2,3 Strengths are average of number of tests indicated, rounded to 0.1 MPa.
(b) The slump varied by 25 mm for each 2 per cent They showed coral concrete to shrink 0.343 to 0.060
variation in the total water content. per cent, compared with 0.038 to 0.051 per cent for
(c) The concrete density was 2.320 t/m3 at 75 mm volcanic beach sand concrete. These were
slump. measured after drying in an oven at 55C for about
two months. The results are of similar order but
(d) The concrete was moderately to highly plastic, further testing would be required to determine strictly
increasing with higher cement contents. The op- comparable shrinkage properties. However, the coral
timum sand content would appear to be about 42 bars lost more weight and lost it faster than the
per cent with 260 kg of cement/m3 of concrete, volcanic sand concrete (10 per cent against 5.5 per
giving about 17 MPa at 28 days, ranging to 37 cent by weight respectively).
per cent with 395 kg of cement to give 34 MPa,
all at 75 mm slump.
(e) The concrete tended to stiffen quickly and no As the diurnal temperature range throughout the
bleeding was observed. This is attributed to the year is only 10 or 1 2C, durability is hardly affected
porous nature of the coral. by variation of the ambient temperature and weather
conditions. However, the tests indicated that coral
Concrete bars were made with coral and concrete probably had a much higher permeability to
volcanic beach sands to measure drying shrinkage. water than normal concrete and that durability
therefore may well be inferior. Consequently, con- coral. The material larger than 20 mm found a ready
crete made with coral should not be used without demand as fill, there being little local alternative in
careful consideration and precautions where: Apia from volcanic sources. The 20 mm to 9.5 mm
(a) low permeability is required; material found some use as 'clean hardstand covering
and was tried, unsuccessfully, for road sealing. The
(b) alternate wetting and drying occurs by tidal coral was too soft or brittle for the latter use.
movements of seawater;
SERIES III AND SERIES VI
(c) surfaces are exposed to hard abrasive wear;
Failure of the existing coarse aggregate supply
(d) there may be corrosive or harmful substances as caused by a breakdown in crushing equipment
in factory effluents, sewerage works and in caused another crisis and the usefulness of the
swamps. coarser coral for aggregate was queried. Series III
Greater care in compaction and a thicker cover over investigated this aspect. Series VI later tested these
reinforcing were suggested to reduce possible cor- materials again under slightly different conditions.
rosion. Series III used equal quantities of both coarse
As the results of the two series of tests became and fine coral aggregate in a damp condition as taken
available and showed that it was feasible to make from the '20 mm to 9.5 mm' and the 'passing 9.5 mm'
good concrete with coral sand, a screening plant was stockpiles. Series VI used the coarse aggregate in a
set up to process the coral detritus. This separated saturated condition with 42.5 to 47 per cent sand for
the material on 20 mm and 9.5 mm screens. The better workability. The mixes contained cement at
demand for sand at this stage was such that even if the rate of 270 to 420 kg/m3 of concrete, and were
undesirable properties had shown up in testing, the aimed at various slumps. Results are shown in Tables
project would have been hard put to guide the use of // and /// and Fig. 3.
395 377 1 2 3
210 3.30 0.96 90 2.07 31.4 31.4 13.9 22.0 24.2 Aggregate moisture content not
19.0 18.2
controlled, generally damp, cement
370 370 1 2 1
212(a)3.60 1.00 60 2.07 32.1 32.1 12.3 20.3 23.3 fairly old and of doubtful quality.
17.9 17.9
Workable concrete, very high
369 378 2
212(b)3.60 1.02 50 2.08 32.0 32.0 23.1 plasticity, excessively stiff, does
17.8 18.2
not flow easily, hard to compact.
348 376 1 2
213(a)3.90 1.08 100 2.08 32.6 32.6 17.6 20.6 Unwashed materials.
16.7 18.1
All compression tests (except at one
352 371 1 1 1 1
213(b)3.90 1.05 125 2.10 32.8 32.7 12.8 18.1 19.9 23.3 day) in wet condition according to
16.8 17.7
Australian Standard.
327 382 1 2 1
211(a)4.20 1.17 115 2.08 33.0 33.0 10.6 17.1 20.5
15.7 18.3
328 375 2
211(b)4.20 1.14 75 2.08 33.1 33.1 20.1
15.8 18.0
304 375 1 2 3
202 4.50 1.23 80 2.05 33.4 33.4 8.6 15.4 17.1
14.9 18.3
303 390 3 2
200 4.52 1.29 120 2.06 33.1 33.3 14.6 15.7
14.7 18.9
290 359 2
199 5.00 1.24 40 2.11 34.5 34.6 16.7 19.3 50% sand
13.8 17.1
279 385 1 1 2
209(a)5.10 1.38 65 2.09 34.1 34.1 7.7 14.5 17.1 50% sand
13.4 18.4
276 389 2 2
209(b)5.10 1.41 90 2.08 34.0 34.0 15.1 16.2 50% sand
13.3 18.7
335 387 2 2
201(a)4.00 1.15 120 2.06 35.8 29.2 15.2 17.9 45% sand
16.3 18.7
337 380 2
201(b)4.00 1.13 125 2.06 35.9 29.3 17.0 19.52 45% sand
16.3 18.5
TABLE M
Agg./ Water/ Mass of Materials in 1 m 3 Compressive Strength Coral agg. 20-9 mm at 14% to 16% MC
Mix Cement Cement Slump Density
C.Agg. Sand Cement Water (MPa)
Days Coral sand passing 9 mm at 12% to 16%
(k9) (kg) MC
No. (mm) (t/m3) (%) (%) (%) (%) 1 3 7 28 91 Notes
422 401 1 1 2 3 1
234 2.97 0.95 65 2.08 34.7 25.7 9.1 16.3 19.9 25.8 29.6 42.5% sand
20.3 19.3
392 392 2 3 1
233 3.29 1.00 75 2.07 35.4 26.8 18.2 24.1 28.0 43.1% sand
18.9 18.9
362 391 z 4 1
232 3.65 1.08 75 2.07 35.5 28.2 16.7 23.5 25.7 44.2% sand
17.5 18.8
335 395 1 3
228 4.09 1.18 15 2.10 35.9 29.3 19.0 23.3 45.0% sand
16.0 18.8
329 398 1 3
229 4.09 1.21 75 2.07 35.7 29.2 17.7 21.3 45.0% sand
15.9 19.2
300 391 2 4 2
230 4.60 1.30 65 2.07 36.0 30.7 12.9 16.6 19.7 46.0% sand
14.5 18.8
273 396 z 4 2
231 5.11 1.45 11)0 2.07 35.8 31.8 10.5 15.9 18.7 47.0% sand
13.2 19.2
Note: All cylinders tested at 28 and
91 days were removed from water
bath at 7 days . Testing was in
airdried state.
25
ates were much higher than when rock aggreg-
ates were used, but because of lower aggregate
costs, coral concrete was cheaper (Fig. 4) to
produce for strengths up to 20 MPa.
15 SERIES IV
Series IV was carried out to check the effect of cur-
ing and testing methods on coral concrete. The tests
are not reported here in detail but some results are of
relevance to this paper.
10
0 9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Two similar mixes were made, one containing all-
Total Water-Cement Ratio by weight volcanic aggregates (beach sand and crushed lava
coarse aggregates), the other containing all-coral
Fig. 3 -Coral aggregates strength v. water-cement ratio - aggregates. They were each made in several batches
Series III and VI aimed at 75 mm slump and with 329 to 338 kg/m3 of
35
..........
... . ...... .....
........
. - ...
.............. .....
20 I , I , I I
0 100 200 300 400 500
Elapsed Time (min)
35
a
Temperature (C)
30
20 I I I I
The following points were noted. concrete about 0.2.) The results are not con-
clusive but generally pointed to the release of
(a) There was an initial temperature rise caused by more heat.
hydration and solution of small amounts of
(g) The temperature gradients are similar; the test
material, such as quicklime, in the cement.
conditions were not controlled rigorously
(b) This heat was dissipated until the temperature enough to confirm from the results that heat may
have been generated at different rates.
again started to rise steadily after about 2 hours.
It seems that some research under rigidly con-
(c) The temperature peaked between 420 and 480
trolled conditions would be required to explain the
minutes after mixing commenced for the coral
phenomenon. This was outside the bounds of the
sand mixes and between 350 and 400 minutes for
project work and the matter was not followed further.
the volcanic sand.
However, it was recommended that coral should not
(d) Higher temperature rises were recorded when be used without careful consideration and precau-
using coral sand. tions when high temperatures are to be avoided as in
mass concrete.
(e) Low heat cement with coral sand produced high- SERIES VII
er temperatures than the ordinary cement and
volcanic sand mixture. As soon as Alafua quarry started to produce coarse
aggregate a series of trials was performed to obtain
(f) The higher water content in coral concrete mix design data for use of this material with coral
would presumably provide a better heat sink and sand. These materials were expected to become
thus the initial temperatures would be expected standard for concrete use, with lava aggregate being
not to rise as high. (Specific heat of water -= 1, of of secondary importance.
TABLE IV
278 328 2 2
216 6.44 1.18 15 2.39 44.8 29.9 14.7 19.9 Ordinary cement, coral sand
11.6 13.7
270 270 2 2
218 7.40 1.00 25 2.54 41.3 37.4 13.8 20.6 Ordinary cement, volcanic sand
10.6 10.6
282 309 2 2
217 6.38 1.10 40 2.39 44.9 30.4 13.2 20.1 Low heat cement, coral sand
11.8 12.9
273 275 2 2
219 7.35 1.01 25 2.55 41.0 37.6 6.5 14.8 Low heat cement, volcanic sand
10.7 10.7
335 324 2 2
220 5.08 0.97 40 2.36 43.3 28.8 22.4 30.2 Ordinary cement, coral sand
14.2 13.7
331 271 2 1
222 5.87 0.82 65 2.55 40.1 36.3 23.1 34.6 Ordinary cement, volcanic sand
13.0 10.6
337 325 2
221 5.08 0.96 75 2.38 43.3 28.8 25.0 Low heat cement, coral sand
14.2 13.7
337 275 2 2
223 5.87 0.82 75 2.59 40.1 36.3 12.1 27.0 Low heat cement, volcanic sand
13.0 10.6
399 327 z 2
224 4.17 0.82 65 2.39 41.8 27.8 28.0 35.3 Ordinary cement, coral sand
16.7 - 13.7
390 270 2 1
226 4.84 0.69 75 2.55 38.9 35.2 30.2 41.5 Ordinary cement, volcanic sand
15.3 10.6
402 329 2 2
225 4.17 0.82 90 2.41 41.8 27.8 21.4 31.1 Low heat cement, coral sand
16.7 13.7
393 277 2 2
227 4.84 0.71 100 2.57 38 8 35.1 17.7 33.6 Low heat cement, volcanic sand
15.3 10.8
1,2,3: Strengths are average of number of tests indicated, rounded to 0.1 MPa.
TABLE V
SETTING TEMPERATURE TESTS -SERIES V
CONCRETE STRENGTHS (MPa)
Cement
Ordinary Cement Low Heat Cement
Sand 270 330 390 270 330 390
kg/m 3 kg/m 3 kg/m 3 kg/m 3 kg/m 3 kg/m 3
7 Days Cube Strength Coral Sand 14.7 22.4 28.0 13.2 - 21.4
28 Days Cylinder Strength (MPa) Coral Sand 19.9 30.2 35.3 20.1 25.0 31.1
All results were averaged from two tests. Cubes were cured in water. Cylinders were cured in water for 7 days then air dried to 28 days, and
tested dry.
cement. Test cylinders were cured in water for (e) Coral concrete showed no difference in 28 day
various periods before being air-dried or oven-dried strength whether cured for 3 days, 21 days or not
at 105C, and tested at 28 days. A close check was at all before being air dried. The volcanic ag-
kept on the weight of cylinders as they dried. gregate showed increasing strength with curing
time as expected.
Amongst others the following results were noted.
It was deduced that coral concrete is self-curing
(a) The coral concrete cylinders were oven dried to
owing to its high porosity and water storage
constant weight in 6 to 10 days; this state was
not quite reached in 26 days with rock aggregate capacity. However, failure strength was limited by
concrete despite a much lower water content. the aggregate strength and greatly reduced the
This is an indication of the relatively higher per- influence of water-cement ratio beyond a certain
meability of coral concrete. point.
(b) The amount of water evaporated from coral con- SERIES V
crete was about 50 per cent more than from the
other type, and indicated its higher porosity. This series of tests was commenced to determine
whether coral aggregates should be cleansed of
(c) Coral concrete was nearly 0.5 t lighter/m3 at 2.1 residual salts by washing. However, attempts to
t/m3 when made and it reduced to a little less measure the salt content with available facilities
than 2 t/m3 on air drying.
were not successful and comparative strength tests
(d) The 28 day strengths, tested under standard showed no significant difference. Efflorescence did
conditions were: not appear to be a problem.
(i) coral aggregate concrete 21 MPa, and
(ii) volcanic aggregate concrete 33 MPa. An initial test to determine comparative setting
temperatures was made and showed that higher tem-
peratures were reached in coral concrete. This was
28 found to be intriguing and Series V developed into an
examination of the heat release property of coral and
volcanic aggregate concretes.
26
28 Day Cy linder Strength (MPa )
35
Temperature C)
30
20 I
0 100 200 300 400 500
Elapsed Time (min)
TABLE VI
Test readings were taken in the middle of 150 mm cubes on wo samples of each concrete
simultaneously, in pairs on six different days. The results summarised above are means of two individual
results which in all cases agreed closely. The figures are strictly comparable only within each test.
45--
40
egz"
e "a`Nc31 Slumps from 60-90 mm
30
cpzIs
\CP
\''' a
co-s'e 2,\ 52'`\
25 sri` ates
A egg
Corm
20
A
A
15 1
260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420
Cement Content (kg/m3 )
On several occasions two concrete test cylin- (d) It loses more weight and at a faster rate as it
ders were taken from each of five or six batches of a dries out; it is inferred that the concrete per-
pour to determine the variation in quality, so that the meability is considerably higher and that
target strength could be designed with a realistic durability is reduced in certain applications.
margin above the required characteristic strength. (e) It reached higher temperatures in tests during
These tests gave a surprisingly low quality variation. the cement hydration period. As the high water
Errors in batching by volume generally caused ex- content would significantly increase the specific
cessive use of cement. Interest increased in testing, heat value of the plastic concrete it is inferred
particularly on large and more important jobs super- that more heat is generated than in normal con-
vised by expatriate consultants. The Building Section crete for the same cement content per unit
of PWD also showed much interest in improving con- volume, and the same workability.
crete technology. (f) It would be more vulnerable to damage by cycli-
cal wetting and drying and exposure to certain
In July 1978, the Special Projects Development substances; this arises from the inference of in-
Corporation imported a small batching plant and two creased permeability (see (d) ). The low diurnal
small transit mixers. This action should solve many of temperature range in Western Samoa, at least at
the quality control problems and further relieve the low altitudes, ensures that durability would be
plant workshops of much repair and maintenance on comparable with rock aggregate concrete for
the numerous small mixers in use. A concrete pro- most applications.
ducts plant was installed recently for use mainly in
(g) It is inferior in strength. If made with a mixture of
making culvert pipes. Results of the laboratory trials
coarse rock aggregate and coral sand, an ac-
allow mixes to be designed accurately for !patching
ceptable quality is obtained for most purposes.
by weight in these plants.
Concrete containing aggregates of coral is
suitable for use in low-load bearing conditions.
For strengths up to 20 MPa the cost of materials
is lower.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
It is concluded that the use of coral sand for con-
In comparison with concrete made of rock aggreg- crete in Western Samoa is desirable because:
ates, concrete containing coral has the following (a) it is abundant and cheaper than crushed rock
properties. sand;
(b) it relieves the burden of supply from natural sand
(a) It requires an unusually large amount of water to
give a desired workability. This is due to the high deposits on rivers and beaches, thus reducing
the environmental impact; and
absorption of coral materials. The concrete
volume contains up to 40 per cent of water as (c) it does not require alienation of land, an impor-
compared to 20 to 25 per cent for rock aggreg- tant factor in a country with a fast growing
ate concrete, with the same cement content and population.
workability.
The limited quantities of good quality volcanic
(b) It has a lower density. alluvium sand should be reserved for high grade con-
crete such as in bridge works, water reservoirs and
(c) It has a tendency to self-cure due to the high dams. The use of crushed lava sand is unnecessary
water content. This is an advantage in areas of and to be avoided on the count of poor quality and
low technology. excessive cost.
REFERENCES TRANSPORT AND ROAD RESEARCH LABORATORY (1947). Design of concrete mixes.
Road Note 4. (Now replaced by TEYCHENNE, D.C. et al. Design of normal concrete
mixes. Joint Pub. of TRRL, Build. Res. Estab. and Cement Conc. Assoc. London, HMSO,
1975.)
VINES, F.R. and FALCONER, G. (1980). Experience with coral and volcanic road construc-
tion materials in Western Samoa. Aust. Rd Res. 10(1), pp. 32-38.
FURTHER READING VINES, F.R. (1976). The use of coral sands for the construction of the Vaitele access road.
Technical Report appended to July 1976 monthly report for Western Samoan-
Australian Workshop and Road Maintenance Project.
(1977). Use of coral sand in concrete. Technical Report appended to the July 1977
monthly report for Western Samoan-Australian Workshop and Road Maintenance Pro-
ject.
(1977-78). Materials Laboratory Bulletins 1 to 12. Issued from the Western Samoan
Public Works Department Materials Laboratory. Information based on laboratory and
field work, dealing with concrete, road pavement, aggregates, explosives, etc.