In a recent special issue of a popular architecture Space as Container
magazine that was devoted to Milan, two expensive shops in the city's center were listedwithout any Perhaps this is only one of the symptoms of the embarrassment or perplexityas indicators of the landscape's change, which is no longer our material city's liveability. In reality, to paint Milanese live- territory, but the area to where communication has ability in such a pandering way is a perfect example of moved. The passage from landscape to media- the loss of identity of a place while it seems to be scape involves a change our perceptive rather than labouring to hold in due consideration the identities communicative modalities, and it is the media that compose it. More and more, Milan resembles one landscapethe decentralized place par excellence of those condominiums imagined by J.G. Ballard. that appears to us all the more as a non-place of com- munication. From the very beginning, new communi- By now it has become commonplace to say that the cative technologies privileged spontaneous aggre- metropolis causes alienation and fragmentation; gations: BBS, community groups, or concepts like evidently, the places where meaningful aggregation MUD (Multi-User Domains = areas of multiple fre- and communication are still possible are elsewhere. quentations), which tried to establish community More than a social space, the city has become a Net of dialogues based on common themes and ideas. In cells which don't meet, without center and without these cases, the space is constituted by those people margins. According to some, the need for virtual who frequent it. The position of these areas of dis- places emerges from this lack, not because of a de- course inside a virtual space has opened new roads for mand for simulation, but due to the need for com- the complex architecture of communication, repre- munication. The virtual develops as a reaction to a sented today by the Net. world that has no other physical realities to develop. It appears quite evident that if single spatial unity Extraterritoriality becomes increasingly meaningless for us, we will no longer be able to place and define it as a living/ The space that invites activity is the space that con- meeting place; the tendency is to widen the context tains the present. It is not the case, therefore, that in a because it develops (or cultivates) an awareness of society still sceptical of contemporaneity (and of art, place. Place, in general, is the true space for the its illegitimate daughter), a virtual space has been transmission of content. It's happening in the new created, though it's fundamentally extraterritorial. media landscape, but is it not absurd that this place is Inside this space, ways and places find space inside revealed through the windows of those small boxes those interstitial areas which usually deny them access called computers? The Net thrives on these incon- because they don't conform. Yet, it is exactly in these gruities, it is an unbelievable mixture of public and middle areas that meanings barter to ransom content private. Think of the use of the word home page, from conformism and banality. These are the places which covers the site of a single person or a big firm. that give the signal of a diffused metropolis, a dilated The home page vindicates the personalization of the space, a place that is no longer possible to circum- message, the singularity of private space made avail- scribe within the limits of urban space: a gigantic, ex- able to the endless communicative potentiality of the traterritorial metropolis. Transition, exportation, and Net. Whereas in our cities, every culture of difference communication are possible here. The boundary is waning, the Net forces us to consider them. In this between the observer who interprets, classifies, and new space, the two symbolic places between which orders, and the spectator who is confined to receiving the contents expand are, please note, the home page in a contemplative manner, is definitely weakened and the World Wide Web. Which is to say, your own here. house and the whole world, local and global. In this uneasy, but extremely dense context of meanings, it What I augur, however, is certainly not used diffusely has become necessary to open the right perceptive co- in technology by artists as a healthy cohabitation, the ordinates, to cross what seems like the true contemp- awareness of still wanting to investigate contempo- orary metropolis: a place that pushes the subject to raneity as a space of endless inventionI always hope rediscuss every stabilized or normative boundary. In that technology will help to bring imagination beyond this place, where you can no longer distinguish the pure mimesis of a reality that's more and more between inside and outside, fragmentation is the difficult to represent. model best adjusted to face reality, forcing us to see again the traditional way of observing, living, and criticizing the connection between space and com- The idea of house and the concept of habitation munication. seem somewhat inadequate in an epoch in which many are turning towards cyberspace and crossing Here and now, values and styles, plans and visions, over appears more meaningful than any permanent encounter one another in untraditional forms. Here is hypothesis. Even wanting to stand behind the most a possibility to negotiate identity through the mani- enthusiastic, we are forced to acknowledge that it is at fold territories in which differences cohabit. Above all, home that we have our personal computer and that it is in this situation of virtualitywhich is very near the computer itselfonce torn asunder for the pleas- the virtuality of artthat everything remains to be ure of our childrenreveals to us an image not very built. distant from what the Romans imagined as the series of rooms in which we distribute our memory. Answer- ing machines and our electronic mail terminal testify For a Poetic of Habitation to our presence even if we are physically absent. We are available even if we are not there, and this doesn't To inhabit, it seems, is attained only through building. seem to provoke in us any serious identity problems. This ultimate, to construct, has that, that is to inhabit, The house seems, therefore, to replace our memory: as its end. But not all constructions are of residences. we are everywhere, it is the place of eternal return. The language html and the figured language in use in the Martin Heidegger Net have by now made the use of the term home page common. From here, one departs to travel along new roads; to here one returns to close the connection We exist contemporaneously in different places: phy- or go on toward another home page. sical and virtual, mental and emotional... But there is one place that is usually ignoredand in effect it is Our houses have become ambivalent; on the one small (at least mine is)perhaps precisely because it's hand, they confirm the idea of shelter; from another right in front of our eyes. According to Gaston point of view, the invasion of home technology has Bachelard all inhabited spaces communicate the made them mere switchboards that can carry us concept of house, a feeling that furnishes not only a anywhere, mentally. If multimedia machines carry us sense of protection and shelter, but also an environ- in continuous movement toward a virtual physicality, ment with perceptible limits... He is dealing with it is also true that people have not been invited here to limits that are remade to our innate attitudes towards meet with a new world of fantastic objects, but to centrality and to our natural inclinations towards discover the expansion of their own communicative privacy. abilities within these objects, and, perhaps, to redis- cover some places to share. In many works by Italian artiststhat refer to the image (...not all constructions are of residences) the house is considered the central reference point in our relationship to space; which is then the space that we inhabit, or the inhabitable space. The house as container from which flow images of passion and obsession, images of empty, alienating, overflowing, or extremely brilliant rooms. Rooms in which, like rooms figured in the memory, artists create an inti- mate architecture of experience and reflection. I speak about rooms not to point out the easy icon of a closed, circumscribed place, but as a metaphoric place inside of which there are no physical barriers, only exper- iences of relationships between oneself and the world, rooms in which a simple object might remind us of an image from infancy, or at times refer to the Bel Paese, other times to the typical, which no longer typifies, an empty referent testifying only to the loss of identity. The house is certainly a cell in traditional architectural terms, but in many works it symbolizes a unity of place that springs out of the meeting between traditional architecture and the visionary one of com- munication, which is in turn composed from various arts, but is based above all on our desire to contribute and share.