Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Download by: [The University of Edinburgh] Date: 16 February 2017, At: 02:52
Chrm. Eng. C o r n . . 19%. Vol. 173. pp. 79-90 Q 1999 OPA (Ovcruas Publishcn Asmiation) N.V.
Rcprintr available d i m l y from lhc publisher Published by license under
Photocopying permitted by license only the Gordon and Breach Seicna
Publirhcn imprint.
Prinvd in Malaysia.
CHARACTERISATION OF CAKE
COMPRESSIBILITY IN DEAD-END
MICROFILTRATION OF MICROBIAL
SUSPENSIONS
A. A. McCARTHY, P. GILBOY, P. K. WALSH
and G . FOLEY*
School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin 9 , Ireland
INTRODUCTION
been comparatively rare and many fundamental questions regarding the pro-
perties of microbial filter cakes remain unanswered. In particular, the mecha-
nism of cake compressibility in microbial filtration is not well understood.
Filter cake compressibility is the term used to denote the tendency for the
specific cake resistance to increase with pressure. The specific cake resist-
ance, a, can be related to the filtrate flux, J, through the equation
Microorganisms
The microbial suspensions used in this study were (i) resuspended active dry
yeast (Distillers Company Limited, Scotland), (ii) washed suspensions of
FILTRATION OF MICROBIAL SUSPENSIONS 81
the same active dry yeast, (iii) the same yeast reactivated in culture medium
as described previously [6], (iv) the fungus Kluyveromyces marxianus var
marxianus NRRLy2415 (Northern Regional Research Laboratories, Peoria,
IL) which displays a variety of morphological forms, from simple ovoid
yeast to branched mycelia as described previously [7].
Fermentation
A YEPD medium consisting of 10g/L yeast extract, 20g/L bacteriological
peptone and 20g/L D-glucose was prepared for cultivation of the bakers
yeast (BY). Cultivation was performed on a shaker table (133 rpm) at 30C
for 24hours. Both yeast-like (KMI) and mycelial (KM2) K. marxianus
suspensions were grown on whey based medium, in batch and continuous
culture, as described previously [5, 71.
Image Analysis
The mean specific cell surface area, S, (defined as the mean surface area
per unit volume) and mean cell aspect ratio, Lh, (defined as the mean ratio
of length to equivalent cylindrical diameter) were determined for each
microbial suspension using a Leica QSOOMC image processing and analysis
system as described previously [S]. Aggregated cells were excluded from
all measurements and no attempt was made to quantify the degree of
82 A. A. McCARTHY er a/.
Filtration
Filtration was performed using a stainless steel filtration cell provided by
Gelman Sciences (Dublin, Ireland). Supor (polysulphone) membranes of
nominal pore size 0.45 pm and diameter 47 mm were used in all filtrations.
A new filter was used for each run. Pressure was maintained at a constant
value by attaching the cell to a Nitrogen cylinder. The pH of all suspensions
was adjusted to 5 by the addition of 10% NaOH or 10% HCI prior to
filtration. All filtrations were performed at 20C. Filtrate volumes were
determined at various times using a Mettler electronic balance (Mettler,
Germany) and the flux, J, was determined as A V/(AAt) where A is the mem-
brane area for filtration and AV is the change in filtrate volume during a time
period At.
After filtration of suspensions was completed, the cake was removed
and the pure-water flux was compared with the clean-membrane value. No
significant differences were observed, indicating that membrane fouling was
negligible.
The specific resistance of a filter cake, a,was determined using the method
of Nakanishi et al. [3]. A 150mL volume of suspension was filtered at a
pressure of 30 kPa. The pressure on the cake was released, the filtrate
KM I (yeast-like)
KM2 (mycelial)
ADY l (unwashed)
ADY2 (washed)
BY
FILTRATION OF MICROBIAL SUSPENSlONS 83
returned to the filter module, the pressure set at 30 kPa and filtration was
allowed to proceed. The specific resistance, a, could then be calculated from
the following expression [5]
where c is the wet cell concentration and V, is the volume of filtered sus-
pension (150mL). Accuracy in the estimation of a was ensured by allowing
sufficient filtrate to pass through the membrane until a steady-state filtrate
flux was attained. The specific resistance was measured at four further
pressures (60,100,140 and I80 kPa) by incrementing the pressure and
measuring a steady flux as before. In this manner, specific resistance
measurements over the desired range of pressures could be achieved in a
single pass through the module. It should be pointed out that after each
change of pressure a steady state flux was reached almost instantaneously
and hence no information could be obtained regarding the dynamics of the
change in specific resistance. After the specific resistance had been measured
at the highest pressure, the pressure was released, the entire filtrate was
returned to the cell and the specific resistance measured at all pressures for
a second time. The procedure followed was exactly as for the first pass.
The procedure was modified for calcium carbonate to prevent the cake
running dry and compacting [9].The filter cell was charged with 200mL of
suspension and filtration carried out at 30 kPa until such time as the flux
reached a constant value due to settling of particles. This typically occurred
when 150mL of filtrate had been produced, at which point the pressure was
released and the 150 mL returned to the filter cell. The subsequent procedure
was the same as for the microbial suspensions.
Filtrate Viscosity
Filtrate viscosities were determined at 20C using a Brookfield V1 (Harlow,
England) cone and plate viscometer.
Microbial Suspensions
Figures 1 to 3 indicate the relation between specific cake resistance and
pressure (first and second passes) for the microbial suspensions.
A. A. McCARTHY er a / .
Pressure (kPa)
FIGURE 1 Specific cake resistance versus pressure for yeast-like (KMI) and mycelial (KM2)
broths of K. marxianus. Solid and open symbols represent data for the first pass and second pass
respectively. The lines represent fits of Eq. (4) to the experimental data. In the case of KM2,
differences between the data for each pass were not great enough to be visible on the graph.
24 s
-i
ADYl
A ADY2
BY
FIGURE 4 ao/.Y; versus Lh for microbial suspensions. Solid and open symbols represent
data for the first and second pass respectively. First and second pass data for KM2 are identical.
FIGURE 5 kc versus Ld, for microbial suspensions. Solid and open symbols represent data
for the first and second pass respectively. First and second pass data for KM2 are identical.
Calcium Carbonate
Figure 6 is a plot of specific cake resistance versus pressure for the calcium
carbonate suspension. The first pass data are clearly non-linear over the
range of pressures examined. The non-linearity of the calcium carbonate
data is possibly an indicator of fundamental differences between the cake
compression mechanisms of microbial and powder suspensions. This is
supported by the highly irreversible nature of the cake compression process
when calcium carbonate is employed. It is well established in the literature
that the compression of powder cakes is mainly associated with irreversible
breakdown of particle aggregates [2]. Microscopic examination revealed
large numbers of aggregates in the calcium carbonate suspensions used in
this study.
FILTRATION OF MICROBIAL SUSPENSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
At pressures below 200 kPa, the pressure dependence of the specific cake
resistance of microbial filter cakes would appear to be best described by a
linear equation such as Eq. (4). Fitting of Eq. (2), the standard power-law
expression, is subjective and inaccurate at low pressures. At present, there
is no explanation for the essentially reversible nature of microbial cake
compression. Direct observations of changes in cell morphology under
pressurised conditions are required before any real insight into the
compression mechanism can be obtained. Irreversibility effects arising in
the compression of unwashed bakers yeast and CaC03 cakes appear to be
due to the breakdown of aggregates. Current work in our laboratory is
90 A. A. McCARTHY ef a/.
References
[I] Belforl, G., Davis, R. H. and Zydney, A. L. (1994). The behaviour of suspensions and
macromolecular solutions in crossflow microfiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 96, 1-58.
121 Tiller, F. M., Yeh, C. S. and Leu, W. F. (1987). Compressibility of particulate structures
in relation to thickening, filtration and expression - A review, Sep. Sci. Technol., 22,
1037- 1063.
[3] Nakanishi, K., Tadokoro, T. and Matsuno, R. (1987). On the specific resistance of cakes
of microorganisms, Chem. Eng. Cammun., 62, 187-201.
141 Tanaka, T., Abe, K . 4 , Asakaw, H., Yoshida, H. and Nakanishi. K. (1994). Filtration
characteristics and structure of cake in crossflow filtration of bacterial suspension,
J . Ferment. Bioeng., 78, 455-461.
151 McCarthy, A. A,, O'Shea, D. G., Murray, N. T., Walsh, P. K. and Foley, G. (1998). The
effect of cell morphology on dead-end filtration of the dimorphic yeast Kluyveramyces
marxianus var marxianus NRRLy2415, Biofechnol. Prog., 14, 279-285.
[6] Walsh, P. K., Isdell, F. V., Noone, S. M., O'Donovan, M. G. and Malone, D. M. (1996).
Growth patterns of Saccharomyces cerevisiae microcolonies in alginate and carageenan gel
particles: effect of physical and chemical properties of gels, Enzyme. Microb. Technol.,
18, 366-372.
(71 O'Shea, D. G. and Walsh, P. K. (1996). Morphological characterisation of the dimorphic
yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus var. marxianus NRRLy2415 by semi-automated image
analysis, Biofechnol. Bioeng., 51, 679-690.
(81 Ju. L.-K. and Ho, C. S. (1988). Correlation of cell volume fractions with cell concentration
in fermentation media, Biofechnol. Bioeng., 32, 95-99.
191 Wakeman. R. J., Sabri, M. N. and Tarleton, E. S. (1991). Factors affecting the formation
and properties of wet compacts, Powder Technology, 65, 283-292.
(101 Grace, H . P. (1963). Resistance and compressibility of filter cakes, Chem Eng. Prog., 6,
303-318.
[I I] Herrera, T., Peterson. W. H., Cooper, E. J. and Peppler, H. J. (1956). Loss of cell
constituents on reconstitution of active dry yeast, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 63, 131-143.
1121 Hodgson, P. H., Leslie, G.L., Schneider, R. P., Fane, A. G., Fell, C. J. D. and Marshall,
K. C. (1993). Cake resistance and solute rejection in bacterial microfiltration: the role of
the extracellular matrix, J. Membr. Sci., 79, 35-53.