Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
By
In Modern Times, many people seem to be unfamiliar with Logic. In the Ancient
and Medeival World, logic was seen to produce absolute certainty. From a realist point
of view, however, it appears that logic, like everything and everyone else, in existence,
has a probability levels which is 99.99999999999% valid, and, no higher. Now, this
raises the issue as to the validity of logic and its conclusions, from the point of view of
probably, true, when there is a high statistical correlation between the theory utilized, and
the data which has been studied. For example, if a scientists were to study whether or
not a desk really exists, he or she would find that there is a high statistical correlation of
the existence of a desk, as defined in the material universe. In fact, the statistical
valid. In the case of logic, employing the idea of, real logic, it is clear that any logically
words, the conclusions of logic, flowing from a logical proof, have a high statistical
from a logic proof, which would negate the validity of that proof. This is why logic
cannot be seen as providing absolute, logical certainty, but instead, only, highly probable,
certainty. In such a case, what is needed is for the logician to develop a new logical rule
to correct the problem. Given the foregoing, if we assume that the premises of a logical
proof are true, in terms of a probable fact, then, the conclusions of that logical proof, are
also true, both as an abstract, conceptual truth, but also as a true fact. Therefore, we can
see that the conclusions of logic are true, and scientifically true, when the logical