Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
3720 as amended
Respondent was found manufacturing, selling, offering for sale or transfer of
misbranded drug products in violation of Section 11 (a) of Republic Act No.
3720 as amended;
Section 11. The following acts and the causing thereof are
hereby prohibited:
Respondent was found selling or offering for sale drug products marked
as Physicians Samples in violation of Section 26 of Republic Act No.
5921;
R.A. 6675
Respondent was found selling or offering for sale drug product not in
compliance with the generic labeling requirements in violation of Republic
Act 6675;
xxx
xxx
R.A. 7432
Respondent was found to have failed to grant the Mr. Antonio T. Torralba, a
retired government employee and a senior citizen of Tagbilaran City, the
twenty percent (20%) discount when he bought three (3) Norvasc 10mg
Tablets last 5 August 2002 in violation of Section 4 (a) of Republic Act No.
7432;
Sec. 4. Privileges for the Senior Citizens. The senior citizens shall be
entitled to the following:
(a) the grant of twenty percent (20%) discount from all establishments
relative to utilization of transportation services, hotels and similar
lodging establishment, restaurants and recreation centers and
purchase of medicine anywhere in the country: Provided, That private
establishments may claim the cost as tax credit;
R.A. 8203
Respondent was found selling or offering for sale counterfeit Propan with Iron
Capsules with Lot Numbers 9PIC-5X, 8PIC-4X and Expiration Dates March
2003, March 2002 respectively containing less than eighty percent (80%) of
the active ingredient it purports to possess in violation of Section 3(b)4 in
relation to Section 4 (a) of Republic Act No. 8203;
In relation to
A.O. 55 s. 1988
Respondent was found selling and/or offering for sale drug products not in
compliance with the generic labeling requirements in violation of
Administrative Order No. 55 s. 1988;
A.O. 56 s. 1989
Respondent failed to display the original License to Operate in a conspicuous
place within the establishment in violation of Section 2.1.1.5 (b) of
Administrative Order No. 56 s. 1989.
x xx
Respondent was found to have failed to file and record the prescriptions filled
in violation of Section 2.2.1.6.2 of Administrative Order No. 56 s. 1989;
Respondent was found to have failed to properly record and keep a file of the
prescriptions filled in violation of Section 4.2.2 of Administrative Order No. 56
s. 1989.
Respondent was found selling or offering for sale drug products marked
Physicians Sample and/or Not for Sale in violation of Section 4.3.1 of
Administrative Order No. 56 s. 1989;
xxx
M.C. 8 s. 1990
Respondent was found to have failed to provide generic menu cards in
violation of Section 3 of Memorandum Circular No. 8 s. 1990;
M.C. 10 s. 1992
Respondent was found accepting deliveries of drug products from drug
distributors without lot numbers and expiry dates indicated on the sales
invoices covering the sales/transactions in violation of Memorandum Circular
No. 10 s. 92;
B.C. 8 s. 1990
Respondent, by the documents submitted by Ms. Marilou G. Jucar of MGJucar
Marketing Company, was shown to be importing and distributing
unregistered Mr. Potato Crips products, as evidenced by samples of the
subject products with stickers of the Respondent company as importer/
distributor in violation of Bureau Circular No. 8 s. 1999 2nd Paragraph.
Verification made with the Product Services Division on August 14, 2002
revealed that the Respondents registration of the subject products is still
pending with their division.
B.C. 19 s. 1999
Respondent was found dispensing prescription drug products without
prescription in violation of Bureau Circular No. 19 s. 1999.
Section 20
(a) xxx
(b) (1) Drugs intended for use by man which:
(A) xxx;
(B) because of their toxicity or other potentially
for harmful effect, or the method of their use is
not safe for use except under the supervisions of
practitioner licensed by law to administer such
drug;
(C) xxx
shall be dispensed only (1) upon a written
prescription of a practitioner licensed by law to
administer such drug, (2) upon an oral prescription of
such practitioner which is reduced promptly to
writing and filled by the pharmacist, or (3) by refilling
any such written or oral prescription if such refilling
is authorized by the prescriber either in the original
prescription or by oral order which is reduced
promptly to writing and filled by the pharmacist. The
act of dispensing a drug contrary to the provisions of
this paragraph shall be deemed to be an act which
results in the drug being misbranded while held for
sale. (underscoring ours)