Preface

This book is a collection of articles written in various times

on the blog of CAMIDRCS. They have been modified
somewhat in order to fit into a paper print media. But their
overall message is intact; they promote epistemological
realism, metaphysical materialism/ naturalism and ethical
self-existence. Which are the core ideas in the philosophy of
amystology.

They annotate and dispel the most dangerous and deleterious

concepts of epistemological idealism, metaphysical
mysticism/spiritualism and ethical self-extinction; in order, to
bring about a change in the orientation of people from
idealistic and spiritual floundering towards realistic natural
philosophy.
Introduction

The school of CAMIDRCS promotes amystology a term

coined to define a philosophy and thought which, in
opposition to mystical non-sense promotes natural
philosophy and the objective understanding of nature.
Amystology tries to distinguish and define the differences
between fact, fiction and faith/delusion. Reality which is
another nomenclature for the observable material world; does
indeed exist outside the observer notwithstanding he is
conscious, unconscious, present or absent.

In todays world of benightedness and confusion man has

inundated himself in what is an organized house of ignorance
and perplexion which goes by the name of mysticism.
Mysticism has two branches the spiritual branch and the
material branch.

Ever since man evolved and gained consciousness he had an

itch to explain the provenance of motion and cause of
manifestations while neglecting to study motion and
manifestations themselves. He lost himself in a state of
confusion fruitlessly trying to understand the so called prime
mover, and bestower of motion while neglecting the fact that
nature is already in a state of restlessness, vivacity and
tumultuousity.

Starting from the chaotic sub-atomic particles to the

seemingly ordered galaxies everything is already in motion.
What causes this motion? Frankly, the theory of everything is
still unknown; but, it can never be outside the natural world;
because a theory of everything which is not natural or
material; even if it existed would be useless to a material
mind. We are restricted by nature epistemologically to
empirical and rational knowledge. We are only capable of
knowing via the above means not anything beyond that;
hence, I consider nature to be the ultimate truth.

In retreat from the arduous task of investigating and

understanding nature, man has digressed to mysticism
designed himself phantoms and chimeras and assigned them
the position of prime mover position to these superstitious
mystical toys that he created himself with his own hand and
imagination. What a travesty! Because all our problems have
natural causes and natural solutions all our questions only
have natural answers.

If this is so, why do we had and have thousands of branches

of spiritual mysticism starting from the early religion of
Mesopotamia and their god Marduk to the present day;
several religions which get invented basically, every day;
which, believe a spirit is the mover and author of nature?
Why do we have hundreds of branches of material mysticism
from scientology to biocentrism, the law of attraction and
several others which believe that some sort of law or human
consciousness is the prime mover of nature? As if human
consciousness which is made up of Na and K ions among
others is older than the universe.

Spiritual mystics believe that reality is created by a spirit

and material mystics believe by some law or consciousness
which they dont have a shred of evidence to propose. Hence,
in defense of natural philosophy and the arduous task of
understanding nature the school of CAMIDRCS has been
launched.

What is Amystology? Amystology is the fundamental

principle advanced by CAMIDRCS. It strictly promotes
evidence based existence in opposition to mysticism which
advocates non-evidence based existence. Amystology
exposes the spuriousness and treachery of every single
branch of mysticism whether spiritual or material on one
hand; while, promoting truth on the other. Amystology is a
rational and realistic movement which emphasizes evidence
and verification rather than trust and faith because it
enunciates that; the truth cannot be supposed or imposed by
authority; but, can only be substantiated by proof and
demonstration.

In a world inundated in arrogance, delirium and delusion;

amystology provides an alternative vantage point of world
view striving towards the demystification of global populous
putting forward what it considers to be the highest virtue;
which is the pursuit of truth.
Contents

1. The dialoguepage 1

2. Amystology: The apostle of pure reason and

naturalismpage 7

3. An open invitation to realismpage 13

4. Idealism: The adult puerility._The school of woolgathering

and insanity...page 20

5. Realism: Reality the one and only dimension._Reality is

the creator of the consciousness_It is impossible to known
anything beyond matter._immaterial entities may or may not
exist._man with a material mind can only know material
entities._Hence, agnosticism is a sensible and logical
positionpage 25

6. All suffering is due to the ignorance of reality.The full

apprehension of reality will bring about relief and
selftheism.The eon of selftheism is upon us._Homo-deus is
comingpage 31

7. How to distinguishing terrorism and optimism as distinct

from ebeism as forms of persuasion employed by
mysticspage 37

8. Intuition is an invalid term not an organ of

perceptionpage 43

9. Subjectivism: The cult of topsy-turvies, oneirism and

buffoonerypage 47

10. Naturalism: The righteous endeavor and pursuit._ The

substantiated and demonstrated fact. _The redeemer of
humanity_ The expression of the higher self within human
nature._The child of commonsensepage 50

11. Atheistic materialism: The true state of mind as oppossed

to dogmapage 56

12. Materialism: The theory of everythingpage 59

13. An invitation to radical materialism and eternal

lifepage 63

14. Mysticism: The refugee of the ignorant, blankslated and

the insane_The cult of obscurants and distressors_The
slavery to fiction and self-mortification_The descent to
delusion and psychosispage 67

15. Nature: The exclusive eternal supreme force, law and

truth_A discourse on Intranaturalism in opposition to
supernaturalismpage 75

16. Spiritualism: The confession of ignorance._The slavery

to nothingness._The legalized schizophrenia._Senselessness
rienforced by terrorism and totalitarianismpage 80

17. Understanding the essence of naturepage 85

18. Creationism: The big bunk theory._The systematic

floundering and derrangement._The refugee for the
perplexed and the deludedpage 91

19. An invitation to apostacy: A skeptical essay about one of

the pseudosciences and heresy called theism._The cozeners,
the gullibles and the holy insanitypage 95
20. God has a begining: God is a pseudonym for prophets
themselves or anyone who dictates precepts on his
behalfpage 102

21. Banemania: The irresistable impulse to destroy ones life

with a pseudosciencepage 113

22. The Bin-laden effectpage 118

23. Ethical engineering: The provenance of ethics is

biological._Morality can be contrived from a test tube._The
source of human behaviour is his design._Morality is based
on natural lawspage 122

24. Salubrism: The righteous path and endeavour_The critic

of altruism and self-sacrifice_The Ethical principle of
amystologypage 128

25. Transhumanism: The beacon of all philosophies._The

paragon of all movements._The solution of
everythingpage 135

26. The evolution of homo-machine._The need for

immortality._The rise of Homo-Deuspage 136

27. Masterdom: The ultimate destination of

amystologypage 140

28. The coming of a superbeingpage 143

29. Man can be a self-sufficient supreme-beingpage 148

30. Intelligent design: The need for rectifying and purging

human nature from ill designspage 153

31. Self-existence: The end of the Darwinian natural order

and the incipience of utopiapage 157
Reality is independent of the observer; reason is
the supreme means of knowledge; objects create
subjects; nature is self-existent; self-preservation
is a righteous endeavor; self-enhancement
mandates self-sufficiency; which entails, self-
existence.

CAMIDRCS
1. The dialogue

Q: What is amystology?

Amystology is an antonym of mysticism (conceptualism) and

a synonym of corporealism (materialism). An advocate of
pure reason and naturalism founded on a single pillar of
evidence based existence.

In short, amystology rejects epistemological idealism,

metaphysical mysticism/spiritualism, and ethical self-
extinction. In reverse, it promotes epistemological realism,
metaphysical materialism/naturalism and ethical self-
existence.

Q: Can you simplify the definition please?

Certainly, amystology is an anti-mystical philosophy based

on ebeism promoting masterdom.

Q: What or who is God?

According to diligent observation and evidence; the force of

creation, annihilation, and transformation is nature herself.

Q: Is amystology a dogma?

Absolutely not! It is as said earlier stands only on the

principle of evidence based existence. Amystology is the
science of observation and comprehension of reality; as well
as skepticism; not an art of fabrication, speculation and
dogma like mysticism.

Q: What is mysticism?
1
Mysticism is the product of the whim; where, ideas
fabricated by imagination are dogmatically asserted as true.
Which is a medically recognized impairment called delusion.
Mysticism has two main branches spiritual mysticism and
material mysticism; spiritual mysticism involves people who
reject the material world for spiritualism like witches,
spiritualists, magicians/illusionists, psychics, shamanists,
reincarnationists, theosophists, ghostists and so on.

Material mysticism involves all those who accept the

material world but mystify it like astrology, alchemy,
phrenology, alternative medicines, scientology,
paranormalism, intelligent design, the law of attraction,
psychokinesis, ufology, herbalism, acupuncture, yoga,
meditation, and so on. In short, any concept or theory which
tends to be idealistic rather than realistic is designated as
mysticism and is in direct conflict with amystology.

Q: What is conceptualism?

Conceptualism is the world of ideas within the fancy of man

i.e. what is in his head.

Q: What is corporealism?

Corporealism is the world of reality; which, exists outside the

observer i.e. the material world.

Q: What makes amystology different from other school of

thoughts?

As I said, so many times elsewhere, amystology is founded

on a single pillar of evidence based existence. Because
2
claims without evidence are either useless or pointless and
sometimes may even be extremely dangerous.

Because material man possess a material mind built by

matter for matter designed by nature to function exclusively
via rationalism and empiricism. Hence, claims without
evidence which do not strike our senses and eventually create
a concept are either useless or pointless to us due to our
natural limitations.

Q: Is there a difference between atheism and amystology?

No. Atheism and amystology are identical. Atheism

promotes evidence based existence so does amystology.

Q: If so, why not call yourself an atheist rather than

amystologist?

Because, I believe that theism is not the only pseudoscience

out there. Theism is just a branch of spiritual mysticism.
Hence, I wanted to denominate myself with a terminology
which rejects all branches of mysticism; within idealism;
whether, it is spiritual mysticism or material mysticism.

Even though, atheism appears terminologically as a rejection

of theism it also rejects all branches of mysticism and non-
evidence based existence and this is the reason I stated earlier
that atheism and amystology are identical.

I am just comfortable calling myself an amystologist; in

addition to calling myself an atheist.

Q: Why is reason stressed in amystology?

3
Reason is seen as the guardian, sentinel and shield protecting
the individual from harm and extinction. Reason is the tool
we employ to analyze reality and evaluate evidence.

Q: Why is realism seen as a virtue in amystology?

Man exists within the realm of the corporeal world with a

corporeal consciousness. Therefore, one cannot reach beyond
reason and reality. Just like Baron states " men always fool
themselves when they gave up experience for systems of
imagination man is the work of nature, he exists in nature ,
he is subject to its laws, he cannot break free , he cannot
leave even in thought; it is in vain that his spirit wants to
soar beyond the bounds of the visible world." Hence, realism
is an esteemed virtue in amystology.

Q: What is meant by masterdom?

Masterdom is a term which refers to the idea of absolute

understanding of the natural world i.e. omnipotence which
enables man to be a master of nature rather than a slave.
Technology which is a higher understanding of nature gives
him this capability required to surmount any natural
challenges brought about by natural forces on the existence
of man.

Q: What is meant by being a master?

In opposition, to mysticism which calls for the martyrdom of

precious man to unintelligible, non-existent, figmental
deities; amystology, calls for the empowerment and

4
enhancement of frail man into an all capable and all powerful
organism through research and technology.

Q: So you mean turning puny man into a god?

Yes. This might seem farfetched but with technology

anything is possible. If matter is not going anywhere and
nature is eternal; we might as well make the best of it by
augmenting our knowledge of matter; while, in the process
enhancing ourselves.

Q: You talk about masterdom as the ultimate destination;

what do you mean by this statement?

Masterdom is the highest stage of human understanding of

the natural world. It is when humans comprehend in total or
almost in total; nature, herself with a capability to manipulate
her in any desire.

Q: What is the gist which distinguishes mysticism from

amystology?

Evidence and efficacy. Amystology is a science of evidence

and efficacy whereas, mysticism is an art of onierism and
spuriousness.

Q: Where does the word amystology come from ?

Amystology is an amalgamation of an alphabet, a word , and

a suffix.Where-myst- comes from mysticism itself and it has
an -A- infront of it; which, denotes a negation. Hence, we
have -Amyst- which stands for the negation of mysticism;
then, we have a suffix -ology- Which denotes a school of

5
thought.Finally,we have amystology at the end; which, is a
school of thought with an extra-ordinary emphasise on
reason, reality, evidence and truth rather than trust and faith.

Q: What is the objective of amystology?

Amystology, vehmently rejects all forms of pseudosciences;

whether, spiritual or material; promoting, as an objective the
principle of evidence based existence throughout the world.

Q: Finally to conclude our dialogue can you state the vision

of amystology?

Certainly, the vision of amystology is to usher in the era of

reason and naturalism; bringing about the masterdom of
man.

6
2. Amystology: The apostle of pure reason and
naturalism

Amystology is a philosophy which stands as a negation of

metaphysical mysticism/spiritualism; which is a state of
delusional onierism detached from reality. Amystology
proudly stands firmly on the pillars of mans nature itself;
that is a creature purely material and empirical in nature. It
valiantly proclaims that knowledge can never be acquired
beyond reason and experience; considers, every attempt by
fanatical mystics as a trivial labor and buffoonery, which is
not conducive to the salubrity of the human organism.

The minute man digresses to find a cause beyond the natural

world; that is, the very moment the delusional buffoonery
starts to manifest itself. Man has been said so many times;
that he is made of matter for matter. Hence, mysticism can be
considered as a legalized derangement and impairment.
Mystics are adamant in deluding and deranging the most
precious creature that ever existed which is sage man by their
oneirical tommyrot.

The fact that man possesses a material mind should have

been a deterrence to our mystical zealots; but, unfortunately a
mind unconquered by reason is like a running car without a
driver, which continues to run even after a terrible crash or
like a drug addict who, continues to indulge; even, if he is
witnessing his own destruction.

Reason is the savior of humanity, the sentinel against injury

and extinction brought about by temporary or permanent
insanity. That is why humans in bedlamite asylums who have
7
lost their reason; either, to delusional disorders or
schizophrenia are restricted and locked up until their reason
is restored.

One cannot fit the visage of a moon into the consciousness of

a blind man; because, his consciousness has been robbed off
of a valuable sensual organ. Hence, conception and
knowledge are impossible for all mystical creatures invented
by mystics and forced upon us to accept; because, of our
material minds. Immanuel Kant with his so called
transcendental idealism school of thought states in one of his
quotes Intuition and concepts constitutethe elementary of
all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without an
intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition
without concepts, can yield knowledge. Not just in this
quote but in his entire book entitled The critique of pure
reason; Kant is not teaching us anything new or telling us
what his so called transcendental idealism can discover.
His theory is a criticism of pure reason and materialism,
pointing out the short comings of pure reason, delving into
idealistic, oneiric and phantasmal hokum; staggering in his
own imagination between idealism and realism. As if he can
transcend beyond reality; which, is possible only into the
realm of conceptualism and soliloquy.

If man is not engaged in reality; then he is engaged in

reverie. In other words, if man is not corporeal in cogitation;
then, is conceptual. There is no need for confusion stating
that; the so called intuition can acquire knowledge that
reason cannot; because intuition is not an organ of

8
perception! Man can exclusively acquire knowledge via
rationalism and empiricism.

One of the objectives in amystology is to demarcate a clear

dichotomy between conceptualism and corporealism so that
people wont get flummoxed and deranged. Ayn rand in her
book for the new intellectual says Reality is that which
exists; the unreal does not exist: the unreal is merely that
negation of existence which is the content of a human
consciousness when it attempts to abandon reason.

Kant finally comes to his senses from mystical fumbling and

makes sensible statements like this one once in a while All
our knowledge begins with the senses proceeds then to the
understanding, and ends with reason. There is nothing
higher than reason. Thus, affirming the righteousness of
pure reason and corporealism.

The school of stoicism founded by Zeno of citium and its

adherents have a similar patterns of behavior with Kant;
once, they regard reasons importance and next they become
material mystics; wavering between idealism and realism.

Continuing with Kants quotes he states But although all our

knowledge begins with experience, it does not follow that it
arises from experience. Now he recedes back to
conceptualism/idealism which is the realm of ideas detached
from corporealism/realism. I challenge this quote by asking
the question. How is it possible for me to acquire knowledge
beyond experience?

9
As an example I would like to bring up a story of a blind man
since birth; who, has never heard or touched an object called
a table. Let us assume that he had not experienced this thing
called a table via the five senses. If then how can this poor
man possibly know of the existence called a table beyond
experience? Can he intuitively know a table and explain it
to his audience without empirical experience? Can he
describe the object flawlessly; when, asked by an inquirer?

We must recognize the difference between knowledge and

ideas. Knowledge is exclusively acquired through reason and
experience but ideas can be acquired from reflection and
rumination. Intuition" as I elaborated in my previous articles
can never be a tool of perception. Intuition by itself is a
concept to begin with, not a perceptual organ like the eye,
ear, nose, mouth and skin. Hence, it will be tommyrot to state
that one can perceive ideas through an idea.

Therefore, Kant should have said "But although all our

knowledge begins with experience, it does follow that it
arises from experience". Once again affirming the veracity of
objectivity because it is absolutely impossible to acquire
knowledge from intuition.

Amystology as a school of thought; emphasizes the authority

of rationalism above empiricism in the process of acquiring
knowledge. Even though, both are the exclusive and equally
valid means of knowledge. Intuition is not a source of
knowledge; but, a source of ideas, some of these ideas may
be delusions, paranoia and so forth; which, makes
conceptualism dangerous and unreliable. But rationalism

10
which is based on the foundations of mathematics, as long as
there is no error in calculation; it is always true, reliable and
its conclusions can be regarded as knowledge.

We like to hear more of this kind of statements from Kant

like this one It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge
begins with experience. Once again affirming the veracity
and righteousness of objectivity; in opposition to his
transcendental idealism. I stated earlier that rationalism is
regarded higher than empiricism in amystology; because, of
the fact that pugnacious cozeners might purposely mislead
the human mind by creating illusions; and controlling our
perceptions in an attempt to distort and sabotage our
empirical knowledge.

Rationalism is equipped with math; hence, it is absolutely

impossible to deceive on math and calculation. But still
empiricism is also a valid means of gaining knowledge; even
though, inveiglers might abuse our senses and deceive us so
that we reach a wrong conclusion or create a distorted
concept in our minds. Illusionists and magicians are mystics
who make a living out of peoples mystification, abusing
their senses and controlling their perceptions.

The discord between mysticism and amystology is in

methodology. Which means that ancient mystical
contemplators of the Iron Age and who preceded them;
aspired to tame nature. Plato, Jesus, Mosses, Buddha and so
on. Where all trying to master nature; by their attempt to cure
societal ills, cure the blind, navigate seas, create rainfall etc.
These primordial ancient mystics were quack scientists.

11
Mysticism is a primordial rudimentary precursor of modern
science. Scientists and mystics are all attempting to manage
nature. They possess an aspiration which is identical but a
methodology which is divergent.

Mystics try to tame nature via prayers, sacrifice, fasting, self-

immolation, alms and so forth, as if nature is conscious;
which makes their methodology absolutely spurious and
ineffective. In contrast, amystologists or materialists who
employ reason and the scientific method in their approach;
end up becoming extremely successful.

Idealists, subjectivists and all other mystics are thralls of

concepts; who are the slaves of their own imagination and
inventions. Amystology stands for the manumission of the
individual from the thralldom of concepts and erroneous
forms epistemological doctrines; which do not work.

Man has been terrorized for ages either by a supreme

character called god or given a false hope of fulfillment by
the so called law of attraction; which, is a branch of
material mysticism. Amystology aims to annihilate the
shackles of Conceptualism/Idealism and intuition, teaching
man to tame nature and its laws through correct
epistemological and metaphysical vantage points like realism
and rationalism. So that man can build a better life for
himself and his fellow humans.

12
3. An open invitation to realism

Man is innately an empirical, realistic and objective animal.

Idealism is a disorder of the natural order, function, design
and identity of the human organism; because, when we
discuss the issue of epistemology or the topic of acquiring
knowledge; only, empiricism and rationalism constitute as
valid. Man has no option but to imbibe empirical data or
perceptions; whether, they are distorted illusions as in a
magic trick or non-distorted normal perceptions to create
concepts in his mind; because, man is innately a material
animal.

Reality exists beyond the observer; whether, the individual is

conscious, unconscious, biased (by magicians, impostors or
personal interests), present or absent. Any attempt to acquire
knowledge beyond reason is not just a futile labor; but, an
impossible endeavor which is against our very identity. Man
is designed for the material world; he possesses a material
mind; he, can either function the way he is designed to
function or malfunction. Unfortunately, these are the
exclusive options presented before him within the exclusive
realm of reality; sensibility face-off with zealotry.

Intuition is not a means of gaining knowledge; because,

intuition itself is an idea/concept not a perceptual organ like
the eye, nose, ear, skin and tongue. Therefore, one cannot
perceive a percept with a concept. There is only one correct
direction of epistemology; which, is percepts always give
birth to concepts; objects create subjects not the other way
around. Hence, idealism, subjectivism and intuitionism are

13
just topsy-turvy theories contrived by confounded idealistic
minds. They are not alternative propositions but symptoms
of a disordered mind and consciousness biased either by
naivety or personal interests.

What if there is a dimension beyond matter? What then?

Well, this should not concern man; because, it is against and
beyond his design. He cannot be held accountable for what is
beyond his nature. Even if this is so, would it harm him if he
just had faith in what is claimed to be beyond reason? Yes,
it would harm him to have a blind faith; because, he would
be once again attempting to malfunction to counterfeit and
abandon his identity as a material animal; hence, will be
chastised with consequences by nature. What are the
consequences? The consequences are damages to psycho-
physical health and wellbeing due to an attempt to transgress
his design.

If the objects/percepts beyond the observer did not exist if

they were just 'ideas' as idealists propose; why, did nature
bother in giving us senses to sense? Cant we forward the
senses of man as an evidence for realism and objectivism? If
concepts preceded percepts then we have no need of senses
we should have just possessed smooth faces without inlets
for data. The fans and retinues of Berkeley and his perplexed
theory of idealism should provide an answer for this
argument.

If the consciousness created reality according to our idealist

opponents why don't they create a blissful, utopian planet
free from challenges, just by the dint of their wishes? Why

14
don't they utilize their whatever you can conceptualize you
can materialize motto to use and create for us a perfect
planet and universe? We just need to be like little children
with a wish list invoking any desire we wish to materialize.

I believe idealists are adult children who are fooling

themselves. They and their followers can be analogized as
The dumb and the dumbers. It is reality which creates the
consciousness; the consciousness does not create reality;
idealists have it the other way around; wouldn't it be a
misdenomination to state that the consciousness is self-
existent? Consciousness denotes a passive term not an active
term. It denotes an action where something is being
perceived and that something is objective reality.

Ayn rand in her book For the new intellectual states:

"Existence existsand the act of grasping that statement implies two
corollary axioms: that something exists which one perceives and that one
exists possessing consciousness, consciousness being the faculty of
perceiving that which exists. If nothing exists, there can be no
consciousness: a consciousness with nothing to be conscious of is a
contradiction in terms. A consciousness conscious of nothing but itself is
a contradiction in terms: before it could identify itself as consciousness, it
had to be conscious of something." (Ayn rand 1961)

I believe by this time; we have understood already that

idealism is pure puerility. Spiritual idealists state that if you
have a strong "faith" and believe hard enough you can move
a mountain, heal the lame, turn water into wine, cure
pestilence. Material idealists like 'the law of attractionists,
biocentrists, scientologists and other branches of idealism
state whatever ,you can imagine in your consciousness you
can materialize whatever it maybe; and this is the signature
15
statement of idealism. Hence, according to idealism you are
the center of creation.

Today we observe various doctrines like "the law of

attraction", "biocentrism", "scientology" and so on; even
though they possess different names they are all idealistic
cults; because they place the mind before reality.

But idealists do not realize their fallacious position because

we must understand that the 'consciousness' is a passive
terminology denoting an act of awareness of something and
that 'something' is reality, as stated earlier. Consciousness
does not denote creation but perception. It is reality which
creates the consciousness not the other way around. How can
any man be conscious without anything to be conscious
about? Couldnt we forward the consciousness itself as an
evidence for realism? Because that 'anything' mentioned
above is reality.

Anyone who believes that their 'faith' or consciousness is the

creator of reality rather than realities being the creator of the
consciousness are all idealists; idealists are experts in topsy-
turvy discourses. Idealism is not a legitimate theory but a
symptom of puerility and disordered consciousness.

Amystology as a philosophy which defends reality and

advocates its masterdom; aspires, for the day that mankind
aided by reason and commonsense will get full understanding
of Isness and trespasses the limitations of developing
technologies to dominate reality. What creates imaginary
escapism i.e. forcing people to create imaginary gods and

16
imaginary laws is either the uncomfortability or the
unintelligibility of reality.

Hence, idealism whatever form it may take is the ignorance

of reality. The challenges which are by part the consequences
of our low half-baked intelligence and the intricate nature of
reality itself is the number one source for the creation of
idealism and idealistic theories; because, they are childish
and easy to formulate like writing children's stories;
compared with the cerebral and demanding field of realism
and the objective sciences.

Whether, we are comfortable with reality or whether we

understand it or not; reality exists. It is not going anywhere; it
is eternal. We can understand and master it or divert into
heretic idealism and mysticism floundering in a labyrinth of
confusion and agony. This is the reason why amystology was
launched with a motto defend and master that is, defending
reality from delusions, illusions, deceptions, heresy,
digressions, pseudosciences, pseudoscientists etc.; while, at
the same time advocating masterdom.

Idealists by committing the divergence fallacy are not

helping themselves or their disoriented votaries; just because
reality is tough that does not mean that it is an illusion.
Reality is a self-existent domain. The reason for the creation
of all religions and pseudo-cults is the intricacy and
challenging nature of reality.

When human intelligence augments in the future, there

awaits so much fascinating discoveries in reality which will
amuse us just like the discovery of the DNA molecule
17
responsible for variations was an amusement when it was
identified in 1953.There is still so much to discover and
understand about reality which will eventually transform our
lives like genetic engineering has transformed our lives in
terms of providing better crops eliminating hereditary
diseases, understanding interspecies relationships, and
currently considered for enhancing human beings which is a
noble idea.

Transhumanism by the way is not science on steroids; but,

commonsense on steriods.Which, we desperately need
nowadays in a planet where the voice of reason has been
drowned by the ranting of mystics and being over populated
by derranged apes; who, have lost touch with reality
slaughtering each other due to their ignorance of reality.
Transhumanism is a marvellous philosophy which really has
understood the soverignity of reality and is attempting to turn
humans into self-sufficent creatures free from suffering.

The discovery of so much elements of reality by Nicholas

Copernicus, Galileo galilei, Sir Isaac Newton, Michael
Faraday, Louis pasteur,Albert einstein, Georges lemaitre,
James watson & Francis Crick, Dmitry Mendeleev,Wilhelm
Roentgen, Niehls Bohr, James Clerk Maxwell, Heinrich
Hertz, Guglielmo Marconi, Jonas salk, Sir Alexander
flemming, Charles Darwin, and many other investigaters of
reality have given us invaluable gifts by which we can
enlighten ourselves and liberate our minds from the fetters of
ignorance and maintain a comfortable life with the
discoveries they have brought forth.

18
But reality is still not fully comprehended yet; there, is still
so much to know about this magnificent realm. Hence, we
need young curious minds; the Darwins and Copernicuses of
the 21st century who would pre-occupy themselves with the
nature of reality and the philosophy of realism. In order to
benefit the next generation who would in turn appreciate
them for their hard work just like we are appreciating the
scientists of the past. Therefore, as a conclusionary message
let's preoccupy ourselves with the philosophy of realism and
the exclusive dimension of reality. In order to protect
ourselves from the corruption, bane and extinction brought
about by idealism.

19
4. Idealism: The adult puerility._The school of
woolgathering and insanity

There are two types of idealist spiritual idealist like theists

and material idealists like communists in the case of spiritual
idealism the very idea that there must be an ideal candidate
behind unideal world and flawed universe is a contradiction
in itself. In a world inundated in so much challenges and
imperfectness; no sane spiritual idealist can honestly state
that the universe is an evidence for a perfect entity. How can
there be something perfect behind an imperfect world?

In the case of material idealists like communists they are the

votaries of a concept which is absolutely impractical; which
can never materialize. Both spiritual and material idealists
are more like cousins; who, have lost themselves in a fancy
and oneirism detached from the righteous path of realism and
commonsense.

The most sapient and efficient way of distinguishing

idealistic ideologies; whether, they are spiritual like theism or
material like communism is to understand the very fact that
all idealist ideologies i.e. the subjective sciences are
sensationalistic, self-contradictory, totalitarian, obscurant
cults; whereas, all realistic ideologies i.e. the objective
sciences are objective, self-evident/self-explanatory,
empowering, liberal schools.

The best way to analyze any claim or theory is to see if it is

sensational or objective, self-evident or self-contradictory,
obscurant or empowering, liberal or totalitarian; because if a

20
theory or claim is true then there will be no need for
sensationalism, self-contradiction, obscurancy and
totalitarianism.

It has been said so many times that mans curiosity either

drives him into a paramount or an abyss in the case of
idealism it will be an abyss. Idealism has created more
bedlamites than any other force because of mans futile
attempt to function in contrary to his design. Man is seen to
fall into ridiculous gaucheries and severe infirmities.

Material man with a material consciousness existing within

the exclusive realm of reality can only comprehend its own
kind i.e. realistic material entities. It does not matter how
hard man toils mentally and physically he wont be able to
create any concept of ideal candidates like a perfect
immaterial god or a perfect classless society. In the case of
spiritual idealists the evidence that they provide after long
mental and physical ardor for the existence of ideal
candidates like immaterial god; is still going to be material
evidence or nothing at all.

The paltry attempt to reach beyond the realm of realism will

end in disappointment and catastrophy. The difference
between idealism and realism is the difference between
insanity and sanity; eidolon versus certainity. All idealists are
not discovering or solving anything by their transcendental
nonsense; but, fooling themselves in a toil of futile labour
and self-mortification.

Idealists whether theists or communists have considered the

groans of man as a virtue his mirth as a vice. The more man
21
approximates a delusional the righteous he is considered; the
more detached he is from reality or psychotic he gets the
more holy (in the case of theists) or loyal (in the case of
communists) he is considered. We exist in a society where
mental patients are regarded as indispensable role models for
us to emulate. So that we can join the herd of woolgathering
and insanity called idealism.

Idealism can be considered as an anxiety pill that people take

(in the case of spiritual idealism) to sooth their ignorant egos
until realistic explanations about natural manifestations come
about or are formulated. Idealistic mythologies fill the void
temporarily with fictive tales and folklores to relieve man of
his anxiety of the unknown.

Realism is not just the righteous and just path but the
exclusive salubrious and progressive path a man could ever
take. Therefore, we must reject idealism not as a theory but
as a malady and threat to human civilization and triumph. It
is a well-known fact that people who fall for inane idealistic
pseudosciences are shallow & nave individuals who cannot
tell the difference between idealism and realism; mysticism
and materialism; masochism and salubrism ;intuition and
reason ; dogma and evidence; subjectivism and objectivism ;
totalitarianism and liberalism and so forth.

Individuals who do not understand their nature ;who are not

sage enough to notice that their nature itself is the one which
gives rise to all multifarious manifestations on the ground.
People who are gullible and trusting; unsophisticated human
beings; people who are delirious enough to the extent that

22
they cannot notice the destruction and gradual devastation
brought about by idealism to their salubrity and the entire
socio-political sphere.Idealism as a pursuit of the clouds if
you like; nums the brain restricting it from curiousity,
alacrity and creativity encouraging precious man to embrace
ideas without scrutiny.

Spiritual idealism encourages man to kneel down before

superstitious toys and chimeras as a powerless slave and
minion; to commit himself to the servitude of a gallery of
toys. What could be more insulting to human dignity and
self-esteem; when man with a higher faculty surrenders in
submission to blocks of stones and blocks of wood? Spiritual
idealism does not cease just by enslaving man to powerless
wooden toys but also encourages, self-mortification and self-
sacrifice which makes spiritual idealism a masochistic death
cult.There is no gain for man with in idealism whether,
spiritual or material. Man has every thing to loose within
idealism he will corrupt, injure, and bankrupt himself
psychologically, physically, economically and socially.
Idealism encompasses and represents all the ills within
human nature.

There might be some people who defend spiritual idealism

by stating morality issues and charity issues. But we must
understand the purpose of the charity of idealists is to create
even more idealists, masochists and mystics. The very nature
of idealism forbids human bliss and liberation; so,
philanthropy can never be forwarded as an excuse for
condoning and embracing idealism.

23
When it comes to morality spiritual idealists pride themselves
as the formulators and champions of morality or ethical
philosophy to govern human behavior; but, for those who
have observed with diligence their so called moral policies
inscribed in their so called holy literature whether it is the
Bible or the Quran one will shiver in repugnance at the
brutality, savagery and misanthropy of their nature. An eye
for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, the stoning of adulteresses,
beheadings of dissidents, amputation of thieves who happen
to be desperate enough to steal, assassination of people who
happen to be sensible enough to be infidels or realists and so
forth paints all spiritual idealists as an organized ochlocratic
mafia rather than an organized philanthropic institutions.

I believe their moral teachings are repulsive to the extent

that; even, if we tried to implement them on the most brutal
beast found in the wild; animal right groups will be up in
arms let alone; human right, groups if we tried to implement
them on human beings. Idealists always regress to ethics or
morality when they lose the debate on metaphysics; but,
either way they are destined to lose.

24
5. Realism: Reality the one and only dimension._Reality
is the creator of the consciousness_It is impossible to
known anything beyond matter._Immaterial entities may
or may not exist._Man with a material mind can only
know material entities._Hence, agnosticism is a sensible
and logical position

There exists matter and consciousness; matters purpose is to

stimulate the consciousness into being conscious. It is a self-
evident truth that man can never acquire knowledge beyond
reason. Non-material entities may or may not exist; but, how
is it possible for an eye designed for photons to perceive a
spirit or a non-material entity? How can we categorize this
form of epistemology? Can a VHS player entertain a DVD?
Can a tiger designed to be a carnivore with canine teeths
function as a herbivore? Can a dolphin designed for the
ocean be an airborne animal? Can a polar bear designed for
extreme cold dwell in the tropics? Is the Cactus plant
designed for the arctic region? To inquire whether man can
conceive immaterial notions is like to inquire whether a man
can bear a child.

All of the above mentioned weird combinations are stated in

order to elucidate the fact that an organism can never
function in contrary to his design. It would be awkward for
any organism including man himself to function against his
design. Therefore, nothing is more sensible than realism as
an epistemologically righteous position; for the human
organism because it is in alignment with his very design.

25
Man with a material consciousness and material senses has to
entertain reality i.e. matter in order to create a concept that is
called knowledge. It would be helpful first; if, we understood
what the design of man is In order to formulate a sound
epistemological theory.

Realism is a theory stating that reality i.e. matter exists

beyond the observer and this reality is the creator of mans
every single perception and consequently his conceptions.
Realism always puts into consideration the design of man.

Other epistemologists like idealists and spiritualists state

that there are entities beyond matter either controlling matter
or influencing it somehow because they say that matter is not
conscious and cannot direct itself. Our answer to this
argument will be immateriality is against our design (i.e.
human nature) hence, the so called spiritual or immaterial
dimension may or may not exist; we cannot prove or
disprove immateriality either through reason or evidence
because the idea of immateriality will never enter the human
mind.

You can believe in any immaterial or occult entities if you

like and set up a system of spiritualism but rest assured that
not even a single idea of the occult will enter your mind.
Hence, amystology shares the agnostic position that it is only
possible to understand the material world; because as it may
have been elaborated earlier in several places; amystology, as
a skeptical philosophy is founded on a single pillar of ebeism
(evidence based existence) and other eight values. Therefore,
when we say evidence we mean material evidence for a

26
material mind; material perceptions for material senses of the
human organism.

The discord among fact, fiction and faith as components

within human nature is the reason why we have rancorous
debates, groups and parties conflicting with each other on the
ground. Facts are elements which can be proved via reason
and evidence and are deemed essential for human existence;
fictions are tales of fables which are just for recreation; faith
is a behavior of blind belief in anything despite the presence
of contradiction and non-evidence; which confines man as a
malfunctioning, impaired and disordered animal; because,
faith is extremely dangerous as a position.

Nevertheless, all fact, fiction and faith are part of human

nature and behavior where facts are the products of reason;
fiction the product of mans fancy and faith the product of
mans ignorance/fear/arrogance. Epistemology as a branch of
philosophy; studies theories of knowledge i.e. how
knowledge is acquired. Reason and evidence must always be
employed to prove or disprove any theory. The theory must
be rationally explainable and empirically evident. Reason and
evidence are the guardians of humanity protecting mankind
from suicide. Faith is a gamble with ones destiny to believe
anything without reason and evidence is to commit
blasphemy against self-preservation; because, non-rational
and non-evident theories are nothing but deleterious cults of
self-destruction. Hence, one should never believe in any
theory which can be rationally and empirically discreditable.
Idealism for instance is rationally falsifiable i.e. is
inconsistent and contradictory, also empirically non-evident
27
i.e. if the outside world are just ideas created by our mind
why havent we created a utopia planet free from challenges?
Hence, idealism is just a profound nonsense.

Realism states that matter or reality is independent of the

observer i.e. man. Reality creates percepts where man
stimulated by these percepts creates concepts. This argument
is rationally sound i.e. in alignment with reason and
empirically self-evident i.e. in alignment with evidence.

Unfortunately, for those people obsessed with the idea of

meta i.e. beyond matter; the comprehensibility of this issue
is beyond human nature and his design. Therefore, why
flounder in futile labor trying to discover entities
incompatible with ourselves? Why not persist in
investigating and understanding reality which is
apprehendable? Why fool ourselves in tenacity trying to
prove dimensions absolutely useless to our kind?

The real crime is not to be a realist; but, an idealist and fool

ourselves that; our consciousness is the creator of reality; to
indulge in prayer and monitoring of our thoughts and feelings
so that, we can have a preferred outcome and life
experiences. As if our mind can influence matter. The topsy-
turvy nature of idealism is overwhelmingly ridiculous. It can
be analogized by an individual who dresses his attire from
the inside out and who has exchanged his right shoes with the
left to wear them on opposite sides and goes to prom night
fooling himself as the well-dressed; smart man at that
occasion.

28
Idealism is not just strange and weird but may also be a
symptom of unclassified mental illness. I am not a
psychiatrist but according to my observation I think that is
what it is.The only exclusive way one can influence reality is
through the understanding of the natural world i.e. through
technology not by prayer,sacrifice, fasting, supplications,
having faith or hope, thought monitoring, ranting prophet
dissertations, reciting rhapsodies, and other mystical
approaches which can collectively be designated as desperate
acts of floundering born out of ignorance; in an attempt to
influence reality. It is only the understanding of natural
causes which has the power to influence reality in our favour
by providing us with technology. Hence, the entire category
starting from idealism to self-extinction is not just a waste of
time but a deleterious approach and doom to humanity. (See
table 1.1)

The attempt to designate a supernatural cause to the natural

world is a confession of ignorance about the causes for the
natural. Even if there was a supernatural cause to natural
manifestations; how are we supposed to be aware of this very
cause which we are told is immaterial in nature? Therefore,
reality is the exclusive metaphysical entity in existence;
which, due to our befuddlement and indolence is still not
fully understood; we just have to keep on investigating and
understanding nature while combating idealism.

When an individual expresses his faith in idealistic and non-

evident i.e. non-efficacious concepts like god or the
consciousness; he is confessing his ignorance of natural
causes. Science as a systematic study of nature is the real
29
hope that humanity has in leading a comfortable and mirthful
life. Stigmatizing realism and materialism could only bring
about the dark ages of idealistic domination where the
preoccupation and investigation of reality is replaced by
indolence and cogitation of zero.

Where, clarity will be replaced by discomfiture; efficacy by

spuriousness; serenity by disquietude; mainstream medicine
will be replaced by alternative medicine; pre-optionism by
pre-ordainism; individualism by collectivism; enlightenment
by obscurancy; masterdom by martyrdom; intranaturalism by
supernaturalism; self-preservation by self-sacrifice;
philanthrophy by misanthrophy; feminism by misogeny;
rationalism by intuitionism; objectivism by subjectivism;
aspirationalism by terrorism; salubrism by masochism;
materialism by mysticism; ebeism by nebeism; compassion
by sadism; observation by insouciance; freedom by
thralldom; liberalism by totalitarianism; democracy will be
replaced by theocracy; mental health will be replaced by
mental illness; and finally ushering in the end of mankind.

Therefore, realism as one of the values of amystology is an

esteemed and righteous value to embrace and a route to take
inorder to realize the ultimate goal of masterdom. Try to be a
realist not an idealist or a dualist; because these later
positions are contradictions. Let us join hands and be
industrious in the investigation of reality; in order to relieve
man of his unhappiness and derangement.

30
6. All suffering is due to the ignorance of reality._The full
apprehension of reality will bring about relief and
selftheism._The eon of selftheism is upon us._Homo-deus
is coming

If man had a higher understanding and cognition of reality he

would have amended his condition according to his desire.
Man can apprehend the strange; but, interesting domain of
reality for his own good or he can vanish for his own
disadvantage; reality, does not really care. Unfortunately,
these two options are the exclusive options presented before
him.

Therefore, the logical and sensible approaches for all of

humanity are the following three steps: defend---
>apprehend--->amend.

Which means inorder to live a mirthful existence free from

suffering we must first defend reality next apprehend reality
and next amend our conditions with the apprehension we
have possessed in step two; to ameliorate whatever, we are
suffering from which maybe an 'incurable' disease, a car
accident, plane crash, impecuniousity, realtionship issues,
even death, just about anything that we are lamenting about
in our daily lives on these tiny speck of dust that we call
earth.

Anything is amendable if we have a higher understanding of

reality we can prevent or amend these phenomena; because,
we possess something precious which is intelligence however
limited and flawed it maybe. Creating fictional toys and
fictional characters and calling them gods like little children
31
to amend our livelihoods will never satisfy our aspirational
needs but derail us into heresy and even further derangement.

Jesus pandira had a tail. He was just a man! He was an ape

like everyone of us. He might even be surprised to know that
he has been deified by some novelist long after he was killed
by the Romans. So lets grow up and stop fooling ourselves
in the swamp of imaginary escapism and be seduolus enough
to apprehend reality inorder to usher in the era of Homo-
Deus; where man's intelligence is augmented exponentially
to be the master of nature.

It is only then that all suffering ceases to exist. The

magnificent philosophy of Transhumanism has to be
embraced by every man without fear and apprehension; if,
they want to live a happy and serene existence. There is
nothing to be afraid of about reality; but, sometimes the
forces of nature may be scary like lightning; for instance, in
ancient Roman mysticism they even deified this force into a
god called Jupiter.

The recent death of 239 people by plane crash of the

Malaysian Airlines Flight MH37 is a recent memory and
other related deaths that we think we can't do any thing about
can be mentioned. But the good news is that; yes! There is
something we can do about these manifestations; these are
not the act of gods! These are natural phenomena deserving
natural solutions. They can be controlled by human beings. I
will repeat the above statement inorder to signify its
importance. They can be controlled and prevented with
absolute precision.

32
There is no such thing as the act of god which is translated by
mystics and idealists as either an act of improvidence or
providence. God is the terminology designated subjectively
and arbitrarily to the forces of nature. Mystics assign
everything to god like an infant assigns the appellation dada
or daddy to everyone because of his immaturity and low
intelligence.

We have come to understand that this force throughout our

evolutionary history is begining to be understood bit by bit
and now we finally are having the audacity that our ancestors
did not have to finally claim that; we can master this force to
our interests and benefits. Man is slowly stopping to cower in
fear; under the forces of nature and is starting to acquire
valiance and assertivenesss to master nature.Breaking the
fetters put in place by the theory of Spiritualism.

I don't even understand what Spiritualism denotes which is a

term without a representative in the objective world; but the
votaries of this defunct theory of antiquity might be outraged
to hear that they are animals.They have deluded themselves
into thinking that they are 'spiritual' beings. So, let us ask a
sensible and deserving question. How can there be a spiritual
being with testicles and canines? How can there be a
spiritual being which devours other animals in order to
survive? Does it even make any sense? So I believe we are
21st centry people; hence, we must behave as so; we must be
smarter than our ancestors who formulated these speculative
theories.

33
Man is travelling a long distance from polytheism to
monotheism then to atheism and the final stage of
selfdeification or selftheism which is pending.The stage of
selftheism ofcourse; has not yet materialized but the process
has began and its on track.This era or the eon of Homo-deus
could only materialize ofcourse; when we acquire full and
absolute understanding of reality which is called in
amystology as The stage of masterdom.

At this stage man will possess complete intelligence enabling

him to utilize this intelligence to amend any of his
conditions; hence, coronating himself as a Supreme Being. I
hope I reach this stage of masterdom in my life time to
witness the era of Homo-deus.

Selftheism can only come about as discussed above when

only we reach masterdom but I believe we have not reached
this stage. Hence, selftheism cannot materialize yet. In order,
for it to manifest we need to invest more into research and
technology to unravel the secrets of the nature of reality.

Research and development are the indispensable tools that

we must practise inorder to reach the eon of Homo-deus and
selftheism.To save ourselves from lamentation and suffering;
masterdom, is our only salvation; realism must be our
philosophy; reason our beacon.

Reality is eternal it is not going anywhere! It does not matter

what form it takes. As long as there is a perceiver there will
always be a percept; percept exists in tandem with a
perceiver; one cannot exist without the other; it is a
meaningless combination and a metaphysical impossibility;
34
as is the case of the so called spiritual god who is
unperceivable and incompatible with his material creatures.

A mind nothing to perceive or shall I say cannot percieve is

not a mind; a percept which can never be perceived is not a
percept.Unless, otherwise both the mind and the percept are
non-existent entities. If there is a mind there must be a
percept consistent with itself and vise versa.

Continuing with the count down of the many lamentations

and short comings that we possess and are distraught about
let us talk about AIDS my speciality as a health professional;
the virus which has caused the deaths of about 1.2 million in
just 2014; let alone the number of people it killed since it
evolved in central africa and western africa from non-human
primates as a zoonosis from a related virus called Simian
(monkey) immunodeficeincy virus (SIV) in the 1920's has
been a major humanitarian challenge; that, mankind has ever
faced. The number of the infirmed is also staggeringly sad as
of 2012 approximately there are 35.3 million fellow humans
living with HIV.

When one considers the sensible question: Why do we still

suffer from natural challenges? Rather than the insensible
question why do this things happen? The solution is very
simple indeed to vociferate but hard to implement due to our
weak intelligence and this weak intelligence creates lack of
understanding of reality. Then, what is holding us to enhance
ourselves and our squeaking technology to a higher standard?
And the answer for this is; may, be fear or indolence or any
other answer; which is not really important; but what is

35
important is we must augment our understanding of nature or
reality; it does not matter how hard it is.

Freethought and empowerment are not a sport but

mandatory; if we like to survive and lead a blissful existence
and dominate reality. Let, those individuals who have been
fobbed by Iron age fairytales fool themselves with
superstitious toys like the cross and the Kabba.We will focus
our attention as grown ups into the real source of our blessing
and suffering which is nature. Let them join us when they
come to their senses and sober from emotional zealotry
which is forcing them to produce turpitude and hot air rather
than technologies to amend man's condition.

We will continue to enhance the precious creature; which is

man gifted by a cortex that no other animal of his kind
possess to contemplate the origin of matter and metaphysics;
an intelligent being, but still with weaknesses that ever
walked the planet; who produces symphonies, mathematical
and universal formulas, philosophical dissertations,
magnificent paintings, and so forth even with his limited
intelligence. Let's focus on reality the one and only eternal
dimension to liberate ourselves from the sufferings we
endure in every aspect of life; inorder to reach the ultimate
destination of selftheism and the eon of Homo-Deus.

36
7. How to distinguish terrorism and optimism from
ebeism as forms of persuasion employed by mystics

All idealistic and mystical concepts are houses erected on

nothingness. As a consequence; inorder, to sustain
themselves they resort to terrorism and optimism rather than
ebeism.They adopt arrogant positions due to their lack of
attestments. One can only sustain a theory without evidence
via terrorism, optimism and vagueness (chameleonism)
reconciling mysteries by other mysteries.

If we observe idealistic concepts they hardly make any sense

at all; they are inundated in nebulousity. The incapability of
idealists to reinforce their claims by evidence forces them to
resort to the above mentioned behaviors and to terrorism,
optimism and nebulousness.

All religions and other pseudoscientific cults as legalized

derangements are founded on some so sort of hope and
ramified by the force of fear. I believe this is very important
in distinguishing pseudosciences from eusciences because as
I might have said elsewhere; if a claim is veracious there will
be no need for faith, optimism and terrorism. The evidence
will speak for itself.

You can either embrace the evidence or ignore it for your

own consequence. Hence, I believe that what we really need
in the natural world is not faith but commonsense.To discerns
facts from fiction; impostors from liberators; phantasm from
reality; mental illness from mental wellness.
37
The false promises of prophecies has given us unreal
expectations and the cascades of terrorism have instilled
upon us a distorted temper shaking our salubrity and
endangering our very existence; despite the illusion of
optimism that pseudoscience distributes; which continues to
be shattered by the tyrany of natural laws and the dictum of
reality; we, still havent come to our senses to realize; who, is
the boss of our universe and the answer to that is; nature.

By abondoning commonsense and industriousness what we

get in return is insanity, sluggishness and slavery to
personified nature or cult leaders. Founders of
pseudosciences are either biased by self-interest or corrupted
by naivety and callowness. The schools that they found might
gain more followers because as Baron says: I am
paraphrasing here "The number of the unempowered is
many."

Therefore, the size and number of clamouring idiots cannot

make a theory a fact.We should never fall for the glamour,
lustre, humbleness, terror, optimism, comfortability of any
theory. The truth is tough to establish and pinpoint by our
weak undeveloped ape brains but it does exist! Reality exists
beyond us!

We should not fall into the abyss of idealism which states

that nothing exists except ideas and in this process the truth is
not a fact on the ground; but, an idea in our heads; which
means that whatever an individual is convinced to believe
will be the truth. This manner of thinking is against the
design of our innately objective mind. Idealism will destroy

38
our mind and turn us into delusional animals. Reality does
exist beyond us, as observers, whether we are present absent,
conscious, unconscious, dead or alive!

But, establishing the truth is challenging first due to the

intricate nature of our creator; which is nature herself and
second due to our weak and imperfectly designed
intelligence. So nature is not an intelligent designer; it is a
clumsy designer with a hit and a miss.

Emotional intelligence is critical in discerning between the

tricks placed before us inorder to ensnare us to the thralldom
of idealism and empty theories propagated by mystics. Rivers
have been stained by the blood of many and expectations
have been broken for centuries by false optimism and
terrorism. We can even notice the current state of our world
in the middle east for example were nihilism has been
exchanged for naturalism as a virtue and compassion for
sadism; we are witnessing groups dedicated to terrorism.

In the 21st century we are seeing iron-age imbecility and

brutality. Unfortunately, the middle-east has descended from
being the beacon of civilization to beacon savagery. Its once
proud house of wisdom in Iraq; which, produced prominent
worldly scholars and scientists has been replaced by
madrassas which preach idealism, hate, genocide, mystical
reveries and inhumane savage sharia laws .

I wonder what the great scientists like Al-Farabi, AL-kindi

and Aviccena would think of their homeland; if, they
witnessed it today which is inundated in terrorism and

39
nihilism governed by tyrants who abhore the individual, his
liberty and his enlightenment.

An evil state can only come about when a society is fettered

by the three axis of evil which are tyranny, mysticism, and
collectivism.Tyrany obscures enlightenment of the individual
by entangling him with restlessness; while mysticism
destroys his reason and commonsense; collectivism
proscribes him from being left alone to develop his own
personality and empower himself.

Obscurancy and totalitarianism are the symptoms of

unenlightenment.We must revere our geniuses and
intellectuals for their contribution to humanity and leave
them alone. But unfortunately, when light shimmers from a
corner within a society unenlightened totalitarian sensational
tyrants rush to extinguish it leaving all of us in darkness to be
directed by our caprice.

Why should our intellectuals be victims of the three axis?

Rather than being encouraged to contribute more to
humanity? Tyrants, mystics and collectivists like to
intimidate, chase and even corrupt our geniuses exposing
their own stupidity. How much more intellectuals should be
terrorized imprisoned or sacrificed in order for us to plunge
into absolute darkness? Socrates, Aristotle, Antonie Laurent
de Lavoiser, Thomas Hobbes, and todays intellectuals like
Salman Rushdie etc.

Free thought and patronage by dedicated leaders is what

brought about the Islamic golden age of naturalism and
scientific explosion. The intellectuals in this era were dualists
40
of course; but, contributed tremendously to naturalism they
were, philosophers, musicians, mathematicians and
physicians. They were not purely mystical. The current
young middle easterners who are sensationalisticly joining
terrorist groups are unfortunately, nihilistic; who cant wait
to explode in an airport in the name of a fictional character
murdering as many innocent people as possible; than to teach
geometry, mathematics and alchemy to empower as many
people as possible like their ancestors in a campus of
wisdom.

It is never too late to bring back the golden era of middle-

eastern naturalistic domination and triumph. It is possible to
bring back not just the middle-east away from terrorism and
nihilism to ebeism and naturalism but the entire world;
which, seems to be bogged down in the swamp of confusion.
It is the responsibility as hard as it may sound of the leaders
of the world to formulate policies to guide the young, to
empower themselves through freethought, in order for them
to contribute to society.

It is only when people are encouraged to empower

themselves without fear and procrastination that we can have
an enlightened better society which can bring about a
peaceful world. In contrast, a society fettered by tyrants,
mysticism and collectivism is a recipe for disaster waiting to
happen.

Liberalism, materialism and individualism should be

installed in place of the three axis of evil. Man must be free
physically, psychologically, and emotionally; in order, for

41
him to reach his maximum potential. We must always
remember that a tyrannical state and mystical institutions like
theology are the rancorous enemies of the individual.
Religious leaders and tyrannical statesmen are partners
sharing the spare keys to the prison where the individual is
incarcerated.

Terrorism and optimism are utilized as bad cop and good

cop; emotional tools to confuse and control the individual
who is crying out for evidence. In religion they tell us we
will burn in hell if we reject their claims and in material
mysticism like the law of attractionists, they tell us if we
accept their prescription, then we will experience better life
experiences; and this are the steps that I mentioned as the
title of this article i.e. terrorism and optimism

Like a lab rat they want to manage our actions with

punishment and reward so that; we can follow their
guidelines of daily doses of prescribed doctrines. In order, for
us to lead a sound life; I believe that ebeism is extremely
critical.We should never be distracted by theories which
attempt to tame us by the counter play of terrorism and
optimism. We should not allow fear or hope to cloud our
reasoning. Lets maintain a sharp rational mind, and a strong
commonsense.

42
8. Intuition is an invalid term not an organ of perception

What is meant by this term intuition? Does it have a

representative in the material world to attest its veraciousness
and efficacy? If not it will join the cascade of invalid terms
without representatives and sometimes without meaning like
"the collective", "ghosts", "spirits", "demons" ,"vampires"
,"unicorns", "ginis" and so on.

Can a "feeling" be a means of perception? Can an individual

who is robbed off; of all his senses apprehend and appreciate
Beethovens symphony or the Super bowls festivity without
a need for any of his senses just by a feeling? How can he
distinguish imagination/paranoia/delusion from intuition in
this condition? Isnt intuition any of those terms without a
representative in the objective world? Which does not put
into consideration the design and nature of the human
organism? Wouldnt terms like intuition go against our
innately acquired objective nature? Because all true entities
have representatives in the objective world. Wouldnt it be
sensible to label articles beyond our nature as non-existent
subjective ideas? Is it even in our nature to function
irrationally and unempirically? How can we differentiate a
paranoia and delusion from intuition?

Can a hunch be a legitimate replacement for empirical or

rational data? Isnt intuition just another term from a
disoriented and befuddled mind; hence, a disorder? The
systematic ignorance of the natural world is the creator of the
entire section rejected by amystology; where, intuitionism

43
happens to be a part of; in the category of idealistic
epistemology (see table 1.1) in opposition to rationalism.

Amystology Mysticism
Epistemology Realism Epistemology Idealism
Rationalism Intuitionism
Objectivism Subjectivism
Metaphysics Naturalism Metaphysics Spiritualism
Ethics Self- Ethics Self-sacrifice
preservation
Self- Self-
enhancement mortification
Self- Self-
sufficiency insufficiency
Self-existence Self-
extinction

Table 1.1 showing the relationships between amystology and

mysticism.
Note: In order to understand the philosophy of amystology it will be necessary to
comprehend table 1.1

Therefore, the sixth sense concept can only work and be

applicable only in fictional novels and thrillers. Spiritual
idealists state that they can perceive revelations from an ideal
candidate; that other individuals with the same senses as
themselves cannot perceive. They invoke intuition as their
source of knowledge and communication with this creature.
Hence, we have the so called holy literatures imposed upon
man throughout history.

44
Material idealists on the other hand state that their
consciousness is the creator of the universe. They also
proclaim to perceive via intuition. They try to control and
monitor their thoughts and feelings so that they can have a
desired experience in life.

Which begs the question in both cases whether in spiritual

idealism or material idealism; where and what is intuition?
What type of perceptual organ is it? Is it an invisible organ
even to the intuitionist himself? Or are they forcing us to
accept a concept they dont even understand themselves?
How can you prove its existence without evidence? Is every
whim and caprice an intuition? If this is so, being driven by
instinct is the highest virtue that there can ever be; rather,
than being directed by reason.

As I mentioned in the beginning of this article; how can one

tell the difference between a delusion and an intuition?
According to the foundation and pillar of amystology which
is ebeism we will say, as long as idealists cant prove their
claims of an organ called intuition as a sixth perceptual
organ we designate intuition as an invalid term without a
meaning.

Can a feeling be a means of perception? Is it possible to run

the world just by intuition not by empirical data? Can we
advise policy makers throughout the world to employ
intuitionism in their decision making processes?

I personally believe that it is childish to forward intuition as

an epistemological theory. To act on intuitive ideas is to act
on conjectures. So, I kindly reject the calls to follow my
45
whim and caprice and redirect my attention to follow my
reason as the only means of knowledge and certitude. Despite
the imperfections of the human brain; nothing can come
closer or stand as an alternative to rationalism and
empiricism.

Understanding the natural world can only be possible through

reason as the higher function of the human organism.
Empirical data streaming to our senses have no defects in
themselves. There is no defect in reality but in the perceiver;
who is not a fully developed higher being; who, can be
cozened by magic tricks and chemical imbalances in his
brain leading to distorted concepts, delusions and paranoia.

The outside world beyond the imperfect perceiver is self-

existent the imperfections of man cannot make reality
imperfect and even worse the creations of the perceiver. We
dont understand reality in full completeness yet; we are
discovering and understanding its parts bit by bit throughout
time. Just because we dont understand it totally that does not
mean we have to delve into idealistic floundering by
inventing inane words like idealism and intuitionism.

Let us stick to rationalism and finish the work of

understanding all natural causes by employing reason that
has been started by great schools of the past like The
Charvakas and The Peripatetics by prominent naturalists like
Brihasphati and Aristotle to usher in the bright era of
masterdom.Where man stops staggering in ignorance,
arrogance and fear. To perceive the world from a realistic,
rational and objective vantage point; where he becomes

46
inundated with technologies to make himself and his fellow
human beings happier.

9. Subjectivism: The Cult of topsy-turvies, oneirism and

buffoonery

What is meant by the word subjectivism? Is it really possible

for man to acquire knowledge beyond reason and an
understanding beyond the five senses given to him by nature?
Isnt subjectivism a habit of collecting and ruminating
paranoid thoughts suggested by the brain without empirical
justification? Can we honestly state that knowledge is
possible beyond the senses? If so isnt it to suggest that a
man can conceive before he can perceive? React to stimuli
without corporeal stimuli? He can conceptualize before he
can materialize? How can a human being be aware of an
object, event, idea and manifestation without being
objective?

Material mystics say that the subconscious mind is the agent

responsible for the process of knowing and dictating
mundane life manifestations. But, even for the sake of
argument; if, we concede to this notion; we are urged to ask:
doesnt a human being need to be conscious in order to be
subconscious? In other words isnt the so called subconscious
mind totally dependent on the conscious mind and its tools of
perception; which, are the senses? Which is empirical and
rational in nature? Doesnt the material mystic enter into
irreconcilable paradox, conflict and dilemma destroying one
argument with the other?
47
Hence, the subconscious mind can only analyze and
contemplate ideas feed into it by the conscious mind and its
tools of perception. As we have elaborated above,
subjectivism and intuition can never be a means of
generating and acquiring knowledge. This term called
intuition is suppose to be a tool of perception in
subjectivism like the five senses are the tools of perception in
objectivism. But what is intuition? What type of organ of
perception is it; a tool of perception hidden from sight, touch
and observation at all? In that case it must be just a concept
not an object like the other sensual organs.

Intuition is another word void of a representative in the realm

of reality; a subject without an object; an orphan vocabulary
without a claimant and assigned entity.

How can a blind man acquire knowledge of a painting via a

concept i.e. intuition another concept i.e. a painting? How
can he intuitively understand a painting? Can subjectivism
aid him in comprehending the dimensions, color, genre and
figure of this painting without the corporeal tools of
perception and a conscious mind? Isnt the subjectivist
placing the cart before the horse?

Cant we not provide subjectivism as an attestment to show

the fate of man when he renounces reason and materialism?
Those subjectivists put the cart before the horse; place
reflection before perception; place a subject before an object;
place a concept before the corporeal; place a word before an
alphabet and so forth.

48
Isnt subjectivism a form of intellectual discombobulation?
Shouldnt the object /matter come first before the
subject/concept? Isnt subjectivism another flummoxed
school of thought staggering in the eyes of global audience?
It would have saved them the embarrassement if they heeded
the voice of reason and commonsense.

Nature will chastise anyone who strays from reason and

commonsense psychologically, emotionally and physically.
Our subjective opponents are riddled with paranoia, delusion
and other physical infirmities due to their ignorance, neglect
of the dictum, precept and the laws of nature.

Nature bestowed upon us reason and commonsense to

understand and make sense of the natural world. The second
we digress from objective understanding of reality; the
natural course of events will take route; we are chastised with
one of her punishments.

Confusion in philosophy is more common than we think;

people who cannot be suspected of imbecility and puerility;
people who appear erudite and savant are seen falling into
preposterous follies in front of global community.

Reason, commonsense and objectivism must be our guiding

principles and ideologies; if we are interested in the
prosperity and progress of man beyond this solar system.

Reason vivifies the mind like a beautiful sky in spring

whereas; mysticism obscures the mind like a dark sky and
foggy night in winter. Subjectivism is yet another disfigured

49
and disordered monstrous ideology concocted by perplexed
cogitators.

10- Naturalism: The righteous endeavor and pursuit._The

substantiated and demonstrated fact. _The redeemer of
humanity_The expression of the higher self within human
nature._The child of commonsense

There are strengths and weaknesses within human nature.

The strength can be called the higher self and the weakness
can be called the lower self. The higher self is expressed by
naturalism and the lowly self is expresses by mysticism.
Naturalism is the expression of human potency; whereas,
mysticism is the expression of human impotence. Man is an
amalgamation of the higher self and the lower self. Where
the higher self- aided by reason and sensibility ponders on
the construction of nature; while the lowerself aided by whim
and zealotry ponders on the destruction of nature.

When we observe our environment and all manifestations

nothing becomes more vividly evident than the soveregnity
of nature and her laws which are responsible for all
operations on the ground and in space. The study and
investigation of these operations will give us an insight into
the workings of nature and as to how to manipulate the
operations in our favor giving birth to technology.

The technology brought forth by these inquiries enable man

to cure himself from pestilence; enable him to cook his
pabulum; build himself spaceships; build himself
50
skyscrapers; aircrafts to fly over oceans; electronics to
communicate with his loved ones; drugs to acquire
immortality; and so forth basically with technology the
possibilities of human achievements are limitless.

Technology is the child of a curious rational mind and a tool

acquired by the industrious, diligent observation of nature.
Eventhough, naturalism is the self-evident and demonstrated
truth; we human beings seem to have a natural craving for
spiritualism; I dont really understand this predicament;
where is this emotional need for spiritualism emanating
from? Is it emanating from the lower nihilistic weak self
within human nature; which is destructive in character of all
forms of salubrity? I tend to believe so.

I believe spiritualism is the expression of the lower self,

human impotence or weakness and hopelessness whereas;
naturalism is the expression of the higher self, human
fortitude and hopefulness.

These two conflicting opponents were, are and probably will

create tumult within the individual and on the ground
throughout human history.Where, spiritualism trys to drag
every man on earth kicking and screaming to a masochistic,
nihilistic death cult called martyrdom. In contrast, naturalism
calls on man to a salubrious, naturalistic longevity called
masterdom.

Irreason, insensibility, spirituality, mysticism, idealism,

pugnacity, and salacity are some of the many entities which
represent the lower beastial self; whereas, reason, sensibilty,
naturalism, materialism, realism and civility are some of the
51
many representatives of the higher, cerebral self. The
Transhumanist movement as a bold scientific movement
really needs to be applauded and encouraged for its attempt
to augment human capabilities and the representatives of the
higher self in quantity and quality.They need to be funded
and supported in their endeavor to liberate man from his
lower self.

Spiritualists pride themselves or must I say fool themselves

as if they have discovered another dimension; but in reality
the only dimension one can discover beyond the dimension
of reality is the dimension of delusion. If the universe was
made up of spirits as they propose; then, they would have
provided the world with all solutions to all issues humanity is
facing on the ground in an ideal manner; starting from
diseases to climate change just by invoking spirits. But
unfortunately, that is not the case; the natural dimension is
made up of known natural facts and unknown natural facts.
Spiritualists hold on to the unknown or yet unexplainable
segment of the natural world and lose themselves in a
deviant, speculative, derisive, theory of immateriality. Their
disordered and sluggish minds would not allow them to
venture further in fortitude in to the investigation and
comprehension of the unknown segment of the natural world.

In fact, spiritualists instead of standing in assistance to

sedulous naturalists in their endeavor in making sense of
reality; they become derisive, and vulgar towards the
naturalist, naturalism and the natural world. Asking questions
like is an atom conscious? Did it invent itself? Are you a
hylozoist? And so forth. First of all, we can already observe
matter as a live entity with properties of its own authoring
52
manifestations in the observable world. If you place half a
beaker of H2SO4 (sulphuric acid) out in the open it starts to
absorb water vapor from the air and might even overflow; if
you place iron fragments next to a magnet they start to move;
if you store picric acid dry carelessly; rather, than in a wet
container you are putting your life in danger; because, picric
acid is sensitive to shock and vibrations; if you mix nitric
acid with water, heat will be produced; if you inhale enough
amounts of carbon monoxide you will die!
If you are exposed to chloroform of about 20-30 mg % you
will lose consciousness [1] and other many examples can be
given which means that we possess a demonstrable evidence
that matter is alive. Hence, according to the foundation of
amystology which is ebeism it will be sensible for me to call
myself a hylozoist because of the evidence provided. But
another sequential question might arise which is does matter
have a mind? This I do not know; because I do not have
evidence.
Spiritualism is the product of indolence, ignorance and
confusion biased with self-interest. If we had trusted the
spiritualists; humanity, will be living under the blanket of
darkness enslaved to mere speculative theories like
geocentrism. Naturalism has proved itself over and over
again. Its objective methods have overrun and out won
subjective nonsenses. Its rational approach has solved so
much metaphysical issues than the intuitive floundering and
quandary of spiritualists.

How can we designate the unknown segment of the natural

world as a spirit without even knowing what a spirit is in
the first place? If the unknown natural world is still unknown
how can it be a spirit? What if it is some sort of natural
53
event? How can a material mind know what an immaterial
spirit is in the first place? How can an immaterial entity ever
enter the human mind? Where naturally the eyes are designed
for photons; the ears for sound waves; the cutaneous sensory
nerves for texture; the nose for odor molecules; the tongue
for taste molecules? A spirit is not a photon, a disturbed
particle in motion, a texture, an odor molecule, or a taste
molecule. So how is it possible to understand a spirit? Is it
ever possible that the immaterial can have a concomitance
with the material? Absolutely not immateriality and
materialism; spirituality and naturalism are absolutely
incompatible. Immateriality needs to be cancelled out in
order to gain some sort of sense.

Nowadays, the new frontier for the perplexed spiritualists is

the consciousness they propose that the consciousness is
immaterial. Well, then we must ask a very interesting
question if the consciousness is immaterial why do we
possess senses which are material? We have said earlier that
immaterial entities and material entities are unrelatable and
incompatible. If this is the case; then, material senses cannot
exist in concomitance with immaterial consciousness; but
with a material consciousness. Hence, I wouldnt be further
from the truth based on ebeism if I stated that the
consciousness itself is material; attested by the effects of
drugs on the human mind like LSD (lysergic acid
diethylamide ), amphetamines, alcohol, anaesthesia, anti-
psychotics, anti-depressants, and so on. We should never fall
victim to the magic words of spiritualist like but and if as
Baron puts it; but, strive to maintain a sharp rational mind all

54
the time in order to refute ideas emanating from disordered
consciousnesses.

Finally, naturalism needs to be funded and supported in order

for it to continue providing us the answers and solutions that
it is currently providing and save us from the dangerous and
destructive heresy of spiritualism. It is the idealists, mystics
and spiritualists who are committing blasphemy against
nature, reality and truth with their arrogant attitude of
resisting evidence and a perpetual zeal of sensationalism.

Just like the great naturalist Darwin says in his book

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does
knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who
know much, who positively assert that this and that problem
will never be solved by science. [2]

REFERENCES:

[1] Principles of forensic medicine: Apurba nandy: 2003:548

[2] The descent of man: 1871:4

55
11- Atheistic materialism: The true state of mind as
oppossed to dogma

Atheism renders man prudent and skeptical, restoring

commonsense as opposed to mysticism; whether, material or
spiritual which turns man into a delirious mammal in a cult
of the folly and the fobbed. Matter is sovereign inclusive of
all known microcosm; man is restricted due to his nature to
acquire knowledge beyond experience and rationalism; these
thoughts I am entertaining right now are made up of matter;
subatomic particles swirling around in my skull; I cant even
escape nature with my imagination. There is no such thing as
an occult domain or dimension unless it is a euphemism for
nothingness and non-entity.

Dragons, elves, unicorns, devils, angels, souls, hell, heaven,

gods, genies etc. are products of the imagination not products
of the senses. Adults, even though mature with age are not
mature with sapience, most of them behave like eight year
old girls caught up in the paltry task of affecting matter with
their minds, they find it onerous to distinguish between
products of the imagination and products of the senses;
staggering in the swampy trap built for them by their beloved
oracles they consider ignorance and arrogance as a virtue and
enlightenment as a vice holding high their motto Ignorance
is a blessing they prostrate and grovel before superstitious
toys they made up themselves with their own hands and
imagination; sacred toys made up of stone and clay facetious
therianthrophic characters which are absolutely powerless
against the elements which cant even defend themselves
against gravity if they fell; cant chase a bird nesting on their
56
heads; mute, futile marbles cant even help themselves let
alone help their creators.

How preposterous and senseless is man to seek protection

and guidance from these statue toys built by him? The
imaginary god is no different from the material one;
mentioned above except it is a therianthrophic character in
the realm of whim rather than in the realm of reality. He is
not susceptible and helpless against the elements like the
material god, but to reason and commonsense.
Reason and commonsense heed man to see the world for
what it is; man is no different from a rock except in
organization; but not in form. He is exclusively a material
being. Materialism is the right state of mind; not because it
feels sensible, buxom or ethical but because it is true; limits
have been imposed on man by nature concerning his
epistemology which limits him to empiricism and
rationalism.

Prophets are nothing but audacious charlatans determined in

deceiving and deluding mankind exploiting the very sensitive
question of ontology and origins that we all have. They
exploit humanity by pretending to have a solution to our
questions about our origin, purpose and fate.

These pleonexic cunning imposters build an empire of dupe

gullibles using the intellectual naivety and immaturity of
people. They pose as intermediares between the
anthropomorphic character called god and his creators. How
frivolous and nit-wit of man to concescrate, adulate and deify
objects of his own creation!? This must be an act of

57
desperation to influence matter with his minds with a
material or whimsical deity.

Our self-proclaimed intermediaries tell us that they perceive

a super natural dimension notwithstanding they possess the
same eyes, ears, nose, mouth and skin just like the rest of us;
their futile attempt to deceive and fob us is more convincing
than their attempt to persuade us of another dimension. I
vehemently deny any super natural dimension; even if it
existed. I proclaim there is no super natural dimension due
to the limits imposed on me by nature.

I rebel against the invitation to slavery and minionhood by

the oracles, I trust reason and commonsense as my only
guide; experience and rationalism as my detectors and
discoverers of truth. I am not indolent enough to invent
fables rather I am sedulous enough to investigate nature to
seek all solutions to my problems and all answers to my
questions I am not morally corrupt to allure, seduce and
delude humanity to perdition I am willing to setup a crowd
funding and charity for mystics to help them get the
treatment they deserve to treat their irresistible pulse to
exterminate mankind.

The purpose and objective of man is to investigate and

comprehend the material world asking questions like how
nature works; not why nature works? Because
epistemologically man is limited exclusively to the natural
world as mentioned above already. There is no such thing as
holybook, holymen, holyland, holywater, and holy carcase.
Holyness LTD is a business run by flamens, priests,

58
imams, rabis, and specifically their headmasters prophets
who devised this holy capitalism to rip-off the credulous and
the delirious to fill their treasury with an ambition of
enslaving humanity under their social system.

12. Materialism: The theory of everything

When it comes to distinguishing reality from reverie;

corporealism from conceptualism the measuring stick and
tool of analysis becomes man himself. Man is a biological
computer with input and output organs. Man is similar to a
technological computer and functions through input,
feedback or evidence without which man cannot process data
and create a concept.

Therefore, if man is the measuring stick for what is real and

what is not; then, non-material entities will become absolute
paltry to him and his fellow human beings.The human brain
possesses a material consciousness designed to analyze and
comprehend subjects of its own kind, any subject beyond
matter is indecodable and unprocessable.

If an object is incapable of generating sound waves for mans

ear drums; photons for his retina; texture for his sensory
nerves; odor for his olfactory nerves; taste for his taste buds.
Then that object is basically non-existent for man even if it
did.

That particular object is not made for man and man is not
made for that object. Idealistic concepts like god and spirits

59
etc. themselves are not super natural entities but conceptual
material thoughts and entities in the fancy of man. They are
not corporeal material entities which are tangible and
examinable in the realm beyond the observer.

Therefore, the spiritual world itself is a conceptual material

world; mystics may transcend beyond reason and reality but
only in to the world of ideas and fancy. Where, these ideas
and thoughts themselves are material ions and atoms. Hence,
elucidating the fact that there is nothing beyond matter.

Based on these arguments we can boldly state that nature is

the only exclusive and legitimate entity in existence. I will
not be transgressing the truth if I proclaim that materialism is
the theory of everything and mysticism is a futile labor of
onierism and self-deception within conceptual materialism.
Super naturalism is an absolute impossibility.

When men are in despair and in need of an explaination for

material manifestations it is a routine approach for man to
regress to conceptual ideas born out of the imagination than
corporeal facts born out of research.

Enunciating statements like people are animated by spirits

not by complex physiology; planets orbit the sun due to ether
not due to gravity; tsunamis arise due to the ire of Neptune
not due to tectonic plates; lightning and thunder occur due to
Jupiter not due to electrically charged particles and so on.

Therefore, spiritualism can be considered a crippled

erroneous materialism and fallicious conclusion of natural
causes. Inventing fables is the habit of idealists and mystics.
60
Any natural manifestation occurs due to known and unknown
natural causes. The digression from corporeal materialism
can only be an impairment in itself not a system or a theory.
Here, we should take note that we are recognizing two realms
within materialism itself which are conceptual materialism
and corporeal materialism.Which are the world of ideas and
the world of objects outside the observer respectively.

Materialism can be considered the incredible truth or

sometimes the inconvenient truth because people either look
out to the microcosm and express their repugnance for
matter due to their sluggishness or express their repugnance
of matter; because, it is against their interests; by stating
statements like how can an oxygen atom determine my
metabolism? How can calcium determine my heart rate?
Atoms are not conscious and they dont talk back to us; are
you insane or something!?

First of all consciousness is a product of the activities of the

brain. It is not a mystery. Oxygen, calcium and others forces
of nature need not be conscious or talk back to you to
determine your metabolism and very existence. The material
world is self-existent and self-capable. Motion is the inherent
principle of matter itself. People do not realize this though;
they expect something conscious while being nescient of
matters determining nature. I would not say I think hence, I
am like the idealist Descartes. But I would say I am a physio-
chemical. Hence, I am. My physio-chemistry determines my
state and status.

61
People are in no position to rebel against the forces of nature
they are almost under the absolute thralldom of physio-
chemistry. The conflict between realism and idealism goes
back in history and still is present today; the distinction
between these two is conspicous for those who are observant;
it is the differrence between materialism vs mysticism,
reason vs intuition, liberalism vs totalitarianism,
aspirationalism vs terrorism, alacrity vs delirium, salubrity vs
morbidity, advancement vs primitiveness, prosperity vs
expendability, sapience vs nescience, evidence vs dogma,
true science vs pseudoscience. Hence, as a conclusion if all
idealistic ideas of all kinds are conceptual matter and all
realistic ideas are corporeal matter; how, can it be erroneous
to claim that materialism is the theory of everything?

62
13. An invitation to radical materialism and eternal life.

Nature is absolute. Nature is self-existent. It is not created

and it will never be destroyed. To inquire why there is nature;
is to inquire why there is a god. The concept of natural
absolutism is a central foundation in the philosophy of
amystology. Some mystics are seen trying to paint the
beautiful philosophy and science of materialism in a bad light
as if it is nocuous to the salubrity of mankind; but in fact it is
the so called 'spiritualism' which is an organized ignorance of
nature which is a threat to mankind.

Materialism gave you the polio vaccine; materialism gave

you the anesthetics that inhibit your pain when you visit your
dentist; materialism gave you antibiotics to protect yourself
from deleterious microbes that would otherwise prolong your
suffering and maybe even kill you ; materialism gave you
lasers to treat your eyes and save your eyesight; materialism
gave you the telescopes and the satellites like amazing
Kepler to probe your environment in the cosmos, orient your
position and understand your place in the Cosmos, without it
you would be left in absolute perplexion and ignoramity as to
your place in nature.

'Spirit' is a term designated to uncomprehended natural

phenomena and forces.If you ask a savage what animates
humans he would say a spirit; if you ask again what moves
the planets around the sun he would reply a spirit; what
makes people sick? He would reply an evil spirit. What
created the universe? He would reply a benevolent spirit.
Remember that the term 'Spirit' is a euphemism for 'I have no

63
idea'. An invitation to spirituality is an invitation to ignorant
floundering in a nature which has been demonstrated to be
absolute.

Therefore, we must be very vigilant, apprehensive and

dismissive about this so called spiritualism which is a huge
threat to the progress of humanity and self-existence. Where
ever there is this so called spirituality pervaded in a society,
all evils manifest; as an example consider the government
and society of Afghanistan under the Taliban administration.
Consider what the so called ISIS is creating in the Middle
East and the world. Where ever there is spiritualism there
will be darkness and misery. Where ever there is materialism
and technology there will be bliss and the alleviation of
suffering.

Do not fall for the anti-materialistic propaganda; these forces

are working for the augmentation of darkness and human
misery. They exploit naivety and fear of people about reality
and the purpose of life to impose their own self-fabricated
fairy tales and nonsense. They confuse others while being
confused themselves. They strive to sabotage the objective of
self-existence. It has been demonstrated over and over again
that supernaturalism is an absolute bunk and its theory a
claptrap initiated by knavery or ignorance and propagated by
sensationalism and sadism.

Materialism on the other hand demands rationalism and a

critical faculty. It is loaded with formulas and calculations for
the rational mind to analyze which take a toll on the inchoate
primate human intelligence. This is the very reason that I

64
presume people tend to be dismissive and repugnant towards
materialism or naturalism because the science is just too
challenging for their weakly developed monkey brains.
Hence, the birth of spiritualism comes into existence fooling
themselves with fictional toys and imaginary fictive elements
as the solution for their challenges and the answer for the
prime cause of all causes or the theory of everything.

Rationalism causes great stress to the primate brain and in

order to relieve this stress of analytics it is natural for humans
to deviate into mystical and puerile floundering under the
label of 'spirituality'. The evolutionary process left mankind
half baked (i.e. without infinite intelligence.) The ideas of
supernaturalism come into existence when this finite human
intelligence runs its course.

When you see the human brain all 100 billion neurons and
1400 grams of it; you will understand that this brain size is
already too big to fit into the skull; that is why children are
born with fontanelle or gap between their skulls which
contracts during labor so that, the baby could pass through
the birth canal. Therefore, I think expanding the size as well
as the capability, of the human finite brain biologically is
impossible.

Hence, I think the solution for alleviating suffering which is

caused by this finite intelligence and rendering people fully
baked or 100% rational and infinitely intelligent is to expand
the human intelligence not biologically; but, technologically
to infinity. This will bring an end to all forms of
pseudosciences and usher in the techno-singularity; which is

65
also known as the stage of masterdom in amystology. This
will eventually entail self-existence; which is the end
objective of the philosophy of amystology.

To make matters clearer death is a taboo! Why should you

die when you have the chance of being self-existent; if this
rapid technological explosion that we are witnessing today
proceeds forward?

It is an already established fact that god does not exist yet;

god is still in the making and that god is you; if you enhance
your intelligence to infinity. Therefore, self-mortification
promoted by mystics as if there is a blood thirsty god, is a
dirty word and concept in amystology; instead, we promote
its antonym self-enhancement as an ethical principle.

The influence of amystology will help in creating a futuristic,

self-existent and probably a utopian society; where, radical
science will reach a super level of technological advancement
that our wish will be the command. I cannot even imagine the
type of world that we might inhabit at the stage of techno-
singularity.

Therefore, as a denier argument I would like to inform and

advice people that materialism is our only salvation we have
in order to ameliorate the human condition. It is either
futuristic science and materialism or extinction. I hope
mankind will be sage and rational enough to discern the
knavery and casuistry of spiritual advocates and adhere
exclusively to the theory of materialism in order to acquire
self-existence. Do you want to be a god? Then stick to
magnificent materialism!
66
14. Mysticism: The refugee of the ignorant, blankslated
and the insane_The cult of obscurants and
distressors_The slavery to fiction and self-
mortification_The descent to delusion and psychosis

I am a naturalist and a materialist I do not recognize any

legitimate entity beyond matter and nature. Nature and her
laws are the only legitimate domains governing existence and
the only representatives of metaphysical truth. For those sage
and diligent observers the mechanisms by which nature
operates starting from human physiology; which incorporates
the very process of consciousness itself will be evidently
clear to them. For those with commonsense observing the
operation of nature is an empowering, astonishing and
liberating phenomenon; in addition, to being protective
against mystical astrayment and heresy; any detachment from
naturalism is a slow, progressive descent to madness and
self-extinction. Any detachment" means deviation to
idealism and mysticism.

When, man starts to observe calmly nature and its operations

his reason starts to be cultivated his commonsense starts to
kick in. In addition, his psycho-physical salubrity and
wellbeing will be maintained.The difficulty of providing
evidence has deviated man to the dangerous road of
mysticism which can be observed prevalent throughout all
cultures in the world starting from the western world of
Christian fetishism to far-east of Buddhist idolatry. Ignorance
and insensibility have no boundaries; they are not limited by

67
geographical location nor have an exception on race and
ethnicity.

All cultures seem to have some sort of explaination to

metaphysical questions. It is absolutely okay to formulate
theories; but it is never condonable to be arrogantly dogmatic
about once already disproved and self-conflicting hypothesis;
because, reality is not ambiguous or debatable it is self-
evident; why? Because,real manifestations leave trails or
clues of evidence or smoking guns. For instance, the
evolutionary process left fossils, rudimentary organs, and
aminoacid sequence similitudes.The big bang left the CMB
(cosmic microwave background) behind; accretion left
behind revolving planets and an ignited star; so one might
say that nature is not cruel enough to leave us in absolute
intellectual confusion. It leaves clues for us to collect and
understand and configure a sound metaphysical theory.

Seeking these clues and joining the dots should be our job in
order to understand and make sense of nature; enabling us to
avoid the fatal route of mysticism. The very day when
mysticism gets wiped out from human culture; will be the
incipience of prosperity, bliss and health for all humanity.
The death of mysticism will be the birth of materialism; the
death of spiritualism will be the birth of naturalism; the death
of naivety will be the birth of enlightenment; the death of
indifference will be the birth of observation; the death of
non-evidence based existence or nebeism will be the birth of
evidence based existence or ebeism.

68
It is always those who know little, shallow blank slated
individuals who become zealous ardent doctrinized votaries
of spiritual and material mystics.Those who are indifferent
and indolent but never observant and diligent.They are the
best retinues for biased, recalcitrant imposters. Those who do
not understand the fact that observing the natural world will
provide them all the solutions and answers they crave for. I
think it is about time that man understood his true place in
the universe; that he is not a chosen species the universe is
not made for him; that he is some sort of bi-product of an
evolutionary natural process. If man was really the object of
creation as spiritual mystics dictate the universe would have
been perfect without a flaw like that mythical place called
heaven. But apparently it is not. In our observable world the
cry of joy is soon enough replaced by the cry of despair; the
mafficking of the affluent is replaced by the bewailing of the
indigent; buxom is replaced by morbidity; life is replaced by
death; intelligent design exists in tandem with abhorable
design; and so forth.

In the case of spiritual mystics it does not matter if billions of

believers believe that there is a deity their faith will never
create a deity; just like the faith of Iron age believers in the
flatness of earth didnt make earth flat. Reality and truth are
independent of the observer. Idealism and mysticism
represent the destructive values of human nature. This is the
reason why amystology as a philosophy supports and
promotes realism, materialism and naturalism in oppossition
to idealism, mysticism and spiritualism.

69
Mysticism is toxic to human consciousness and human
civilization. It detaches man from being pre-occupied with
reality and deviates him to the realm of reverie and
psychosis; instead of seeking evidence man starts to seek
emotional relief and sham comfort from mystical fairytales.

Awareness or consciousness is mans precious possession

which needs utmost protection and preservation. Man needs
to guard his awareness from being abused, re-socialized, and
doctrinized by arrogant, knave, and voracious imposters
salivating from imperial lust; which, may be spiritual mystics
which includes prophets and material mystics which
include obsessed politicians. One should never allow his
awareness to be abused by anybody he should carry himself
with self-esteem and dignity.

The other very important question is; are idealism and

mysticism biologically acquired or socially acquired
identities? I believe there is a natural tendency in human
beings to seek the prime-cause of all causes and consequently
it will be natural for imposters biased by self-interest to
formulate one. So in an attempt to understand the prime-
cause of all causes idealistic and mystical theories tend to be
formulated without single evidence. Theories detached from
the reality filled with horror, false promises and fables. I
believe the prime cause of all causes can never be revealed
through idealistic mystical ideologies and non-evidence
based existence; but through realistic materialistic theories
and evidence based existence. The attitudes of mystics to
repel reality and evidence is not teaching us anything new

70
except the fact that human beings can take arrogant attitudes
even if they are doctrinized with spurious theories.

Arrogance and tenacity cannot be an evidence to another

dimension or to the prime cause of causes. I dont think that
idealistic and mystical attitudes are biologically acquired
identities or inotherwords innate. Naturally man is a realistic
objective animal designed to operate through feedback/input
or evidence. No man is born delusional. His five senses stand
as evidence that he is an objective animal not an idealistic or
mystical bedlamite.

The very fact that man is incapable of comprehending super

natural notions is by itself a substansiation that the prime
cause of causes has to be material not a mystical entity. In
addition when any attempt to reach beyond matter ends up in
futile labour and creating more psychotics than evidence for
the prime causer; we can here at this moment; boldly state
than man is trying to function incontrary to his very nature
and design hence, descending into an abyss. Idealism and
mysticism are not some sort of alternative theories to realism
and materialism; but, the disorder of the natural order and
design of human nature and function. Realism and
materialism are the ones which are biologically acquired and
innate identities. Man is designed for reality to perceive it
through his natural senses and create concepts in his mind
about the objects out there; as an observer of objects he
creates subjects of analysis, contemplation and
comprehension; through the percepts out there he creates
concepts in his mind.This is the true nature of man; this is his
design that he ought to function.
71
Idealistic and mystical functions of the human mind are the
violations of mans natural design and function which do
have consequences in the health, and progress of the
individual.

The natural world is not ideal, mystical, spiritual, non-

evident and subjective but realistic, materialistic, naturalistic,
self-evident and objective. Mysticism is always riddled with
self-contradiction and unintelligible twaddle which is
evidence by itself that it is a brain child of a confused and
disordered consciousness and probably a sick mind. We must
always understand that there is nothing wrong with the
objective world out there; but, there is something wrong with
man himself; with his perception, conception and analysis of
reality. When issues arise with mans perception, conception
and analysis of reality mysticism will be born and manifests
itself in human behaviour.

We must also understand that idealists are concerned with

ideas not with reality. They are pre-occupied with thoughts
than objects as if thoughts can be created without objects; as
if concepts can exist without percepts. The best example for
this is a quote from the material idealist and mystic Vladimir
lenin which goes "a lie told often enough becomes the truth."
When we examine this quote we understand a notion that
despite the nature of the outside reality idealists believe by
deluding the individual they can influence or even change the
outside materialistic objective reality which is an absolute
puerility on their part.

72
This is the very pre-occupation of mystics and idealists by
distorting and deluding mans concept of reality they hope
to influence reality. This is the reason why idealists and
mystics are totalitarian; because, they are concerned with
mans ideas rather than matter.

When we ask the question why do idealists reject reality?

The answer may be because they either are delusional or
want to be delusional; but, that may not be all, when the
policies of a power obsessed totalitarian politician becomes
incapable of solving his peoples woes in time, he tends to
distract them by turning into a material mystic and
bombarding his people with idealistic notions of the current
state of his country to his people despite the impecuniousity
and decay of his country by posting rosy utopian billboards,
broadcasts, news, TV shows, and other delusion inducing
toxic propoganda because reality i.e the true state of the
country might be a treat to his hold on power.

In the case of spiritual idealists they crave to create an empire

of deluded gullibles crying out their names in praise and
honour; throughout the ages to make them feel important and
to fill their chest with gold and silver bamboozled from their
votaries. The spiritual mystic scares and herds precious man
away from reality to a world of woolgathering and madness;
so that the doting zombies which like to be called believers
become his minions inebriated with a toxic delusion inducing
ideology. Praising him and his topsyturvy lectures about
metaphysics plus scorning anybody who is valiant and
sensible enough to wake them up from their dreams. Both
material and spiritual mystics are mendacious imposters;
73
before, I conclude this article I would want to raise the issue
of dualism as a state of being half mystic and half materialist.
So we are finally witnessing three heretical positions within
metaphysics spiritual mysticism, material mysticism and
dualistic mysticism. Individuals who tend to be dualists are
emotionally trepidated uncertain individuals who like to stay
on the safe zone and conjecture there might be something
beyond matter or beyond nature.

But again they cannot see the contradiction of their position.

How can there be something half truth and half fable in the
natural world? Is nature made up of 50% fairytale and 50%
fact? Is the universe 50% ether and 50% matter? How can
you be a cozened believer and a skeptical materialist at the
same time? Is there a fossil evidence for unicorns and
dinosaurs at the same time? Can we find the skeleton of
Adam and Lucy lying side by side in a cave some where on
the planet? In order for any theory to be true it must be
evident and consistent. Inother, words it should never be
contradictory or non-evident.

74
15. Nature: The exclusive eternal supreme force, law and
truth_A discourse on Intranaturalism in opposition to
supernaturalism

It is sufficiently evident for those who are diligent and

unbiased contemplators that nature itself is the supreme
force. Where, one natural cause is the mover of another
natural phenomenon. Hence, nature is the mover of itself
without any supernatural intervention or precept. Human
nature for instance is the force which shapes the world in its
own image global warming, environmental pollution and
exploitation, massive industrialization and development,
corruption, crime, violence, conflict, wars, capitalism,
socialism, humanitarianism, imperialism ,racism
,nationalism, liberalism, totalitarianism, aspirationalism,
terrorism, probity, infidelity etc. are all manifestations due to
human nature.

Pantheists consider nature itself as a god which absolutely

makes sense; because it is true. Nature is self-existent, self-
evident and self-competent as mentioned in my other articles.

But if so how do we engage nature? Should we engage it via

the mystical route like pantheists as if nature is a person
pretending nature has organs of perception and establishing
prayers, pledges, rhapsodies and what not; or should we
consider nature for what it is a blind insensible force
governed by various and numerous laws which control and
govern existence? A sapient man with good sense will
definitely choose the later. Nature has no benevolence or
malevolence towards its creatures it operates unbiasedly in

75
accordance to strict laws. It does not possess a consciousness
or awareness; every manifestation has a rationally
explainable natural cause.

Humanbeings for instance are the effects of evolution as

postulated by Darwin. He forwards cogent and numerous
attestements to his intelligent theory. The solar system is the
product of accretion which kicked off billions of years ago;
where the planets have taken that momentum of rotation even
today after having been fully formed which we call
revolution that they make around our parent star the sun.

Epidemics are the products of pathogenic microorganisms

like Yersinia pestis and Vibrio Cholera; accidents are the
products of human recklessness and so forth. If nature can
move itself; then, that will leave no working space for a
supernatural force. The theory of supernaturalism must be
replaced by Intranaturalism; because, all experiments,
researches and observations eventually will lead to this
conclusion.

Intranaturalism is open for debate and discussion by the

massess and can be comprehended by any one; because, it
states that one natural cause moves another natural
manifestation.Where these natural causes are fully
fathomable by material man; unlike, supernaturalism which
states unintelligible supernatural agencies as the primary
causes.

Most interestingly though what makes intranaturalism

sensible and acceptable by people is that all of our solutions
to our most stubborn problems and questions emanated from
76
intranaturalism; for example Kochs postulates formulated by
Robert Koch recognized natural causes as the sources of
ailments rather than supernatural causes; gravity as the cause
of revolution around celestial bodies was also formulated by
Newton rather than ether as postulated by Descartes.

The digression from intranaturalism can only lead to delusion

and annihilation. In a universe governed by the absolute
tyranny of natural laws this so called supernaturalism is not
just trivial labor and buffoonery; but, a dangerous practice of
invoking ones own extinction. Supernaturalism as the
valiant Jean meslier puts it is but the ignorance of natural
causes.

There can never be a relationship between a supernatural

agency and a natural being like man; because, it is
incompatible and incoherent in theory and practise. These
two entities cannot have a mutual understanding and
consensus on any issue. Whereas, in intranaturalism any
natural agency and another natural being like man can
definitely have a relationship of cause and effect because
material man can be influenced and can understand any
intranatural force.

As it has been said; if indeed intranaturalism is the righteous

and correct school of thought and movement what would this
imply to the question: what is the purpose of life? I think it
will be plausible to conclude that investigating and
understanding natural causes to bring about self-existence is
the purpose of life. Because without the understanding of

77
natural causes and an objective of self-existence; mankind is
doomed and dangling on the brink of extinction.

Several humanities challenges like poverty, inequality,

domestic violence, calamities, terrorism, dictatorships,
discords, unemployment, racism, illiteracy and so on could
only have natural causes according to intranaturalism. Hence,
it is our duty to investigate these causes and provide a
remedy. For example let us consider poverty; most of the
population on earth is poor; when we ask what is the cause of
this poverty? It can be lack of natural talent, lack of
opportunity, illiteracy, indolence, communism and so many
others.

When it comes to domestic violence it might be due to

alcoholism, drug abuse, poverty, behavioral issues, and
mental illnesses and so on. When it comes to terrorism it
might be caused by nationalism, imperialism, psychosis,
unemployment and so on. Seeking supernatural solutions to
these mundane ills is definitely a waste of time and energy.
As Baron the magnificent says The source of mans
unhappiness is his ignorance of nature.

In another of his quotes he says Man has always deceived

himself when he abondoned experience to follow imaginary
systemsHe is the work of natureHe exists in natureHe is
submitted to the laws of nature. He cannot deliver himself
from them:cannot step beyond them even in thought. [1]

If one examines objectively with diligence and unbiased

altitudes the works of nature will be revealed onto him that
natural causes are the sources of natural manifestations; that
78
God is a euphemism for nature herself; that natural laws are
in absolute tyranny and control; that nature is an eternal
entity; that sluggishness and indolence are the fertile grounds
where the thorns of supernaturalism and superstition flourish;
that commonsense and reason are the sentinels of human
existence and progress; that all wise legislative bodies
throughout the world always put human nature under
consideration before promulgating laws because they know
without aligning themselves strictly to the laws of nature
nothing can ever be possible.

Despite the obscurantism of supernaturalists; intranaturalism

backed by evidence and sedulous scientists is making a
remarkable progress. Natural science is our real savior;
because, it is through this field that humanity solved several
of its issues and challenges.

We need to invest and promote hugely in intranaturalism; so

that this promising begining could continue into a brighter
future for our posterity and their descendants. Finally, I like
to conclude by stating that natural investigation is not a cake
walk; it requires fortitude and sedulity. Hence, I propose we
should be industrious enough to investigate nature and
valiant enough to fight supernaturalism.

--------------------

REFERENCES:

[1] System of nature-I chapter-1: page 1: 1770

79
16. Spiritualism: The confession of ignorance._The
slavery to nothingness._The legalized
schizophrenia._Senselessness rienforced by terrorism and
totalitarianism

God as a spirit is a chimera composed of various human and

non-human borrowed characterstics and ephitets. The father,
The merciful, The merciless, The punisher, The king, The
judge, etc. are borrowed from human identity/nature and
bestowed upon this character. The immutable,The Almighty,
The all knower, The redeemer, The creator, etc. are
fictionally entailed titles to purify this character from human
weaknessess.

So, finally we have a character who is a father prone to

concupiscence like an animal and an immutable almighty
creature. I hope I am not the only one noticing the paradox
here; this by itself can be an evidence that God is an
invention of the human mind; because how can two
conflicting characters exist in the same subject? How can god
be like an animal to have children and be immutable, free
from animal weaknesses not just at the same time; but, even
in different times?

How can a spirit whatever that might represent possess

animal lust? Therefore, the various contradictory characters
must be borrowed from other animals from the material
world and from non-existent fictional entities in order to
create this disordered intermingled black and white creature.
The reason that it is impossible to understand god as a
80
concept is because it is a chimera which throws people into
enigma created out of various incompatible characters
borrowed from so many entities.

It will be a fact then when we return these borrowed

characters to their rightful owners; either, to humans or non-
humans then god will end up becoming a non-entity. An
entity created by borrowed epithets from the material world
and from the world of fancy will cease to exist. Therefore, to
believe in god will be to believe in a non-entity. To enslave
yourself to God is to enslave yourself to nothingness.

The greatestest philosopher that ever lived according to my

judgement Baron dholbach says in his book Good sense year
1772 article number 20:

Metaphysics teach us, that God is a pure spirit. But, is

modern theology superior to that of the savages? The
savages acknowledge a great spirit, for the master of the
world. The savages, like all ignorant people, attribute to
spirits all the effects, of which their experience cannot
discover the true causes. Ask a savage, what works your
watch? He will answer, it is a spirit. Ask the divines, what
moves the universe? They answer, it is a spirit.

Furthermore, in arcticle 21

The savage, when he speaks of a spirit, affixes, at least,

some idea to the word; he means thereby an agent, like the
air, the breeze, the breath, that invisibly produces discernible
effects. By subtilizing every thing, the modern theologian
becomes as unintelligible to himself as to others. Ask him,
81
what he understands by a spirit? He will answer you, that it
is an unknown substance, perfectly simple, that has no
extension, that has nothing common with matter. Indeed, is
there any one, who can form the least idea of such a
substance? What then is a spirit, to speak in the language of
modern theology, but the absence of an idea? The idea of
spirituality is an idea without model.

Hence, the idea of a spirit is unfathomable and perplexing to

a material human mind; because of the nature of the character
in examination itself; which is god who is a Frankenstein
monster created out of antagonizing paradoxical characters
and body parts.

The enslavement to nothing is a state guarded affair

nowadays this is how far the folly of humanity has reached.
Theocratic states proudly hoist their flag at the UN as if it is
something to be proud about; a nation founded on
antagonistic inane theories and immaterial pipe line
prophecies.

Commonsense, reason and evidence are becoming rare

virtues nowadays. It is really becoming hard to find someone;
who, is sensible and rational; our world is falling to inane
doctrines and being overcrowded by mental patients.

Spiritualism as a concept of nothing is a slavery to fiction

and nothingness. Hence, why not recede to reason and
commonsense to search for somethingness; why not regress
to nature to seek entities which are non-contradictory and
self-evident; rather than sticking arrogantly to contradiction

82
and nebeism? Why do we need to create chimeras that no one
could ever understand?

Why are we obsessed in creating concepts without

representative precepts which can only exist in our minds?
Why should we be preoccupied in creating monstrosities
which can never stand on their own let alone stand for us? If
you notice spiritualism itself; it is a sect of unintelligible
twaddle; an amalgamation of so much conflicting attributes
and notions. If you have observed some of the gods in Asian
mysticism for example god Ganesh and others; they are
antromorphous monsters compiled from other various
animals by the human mind; elephant + human beings +
monkey and so forth. What a ridiculous predicament! So the
god formula for the ones which are physical chimeras and for
the ones which are non-physical characteristic chimeras
alike must be body part 1 + body part 2 + body part 3 + fancy
1+ fancy 2 + fancy 3 = God.

How can we denominate a spirit with a carnal appetite which

impregnates a female human animal to have a son called
Jesus; while, at the same time be free from human animalistic
nature to become an immutable, flawless guardian and
monarch of nature? How can we label a creature with an
elephant head, a human torso, upper four limbs and two
lower limbs? How about calling it a meaningless farrago?

I can imagine that there can be meaningful hodgepodges like

a collection of different alphabets arranged logically to create
words and sentences which give us meaning. But can there
be anything meaningful about a grotesque creature either

83
physical or literal i.e. terminologically with antagonistic
qualities? Can there be a Spirit who is an animal and non-
animal? Can there be a Spirit who is immutable and mutable
who fatigues like an animal after the 7th day of creation? Can
there be a spirit who is merciful and merciless like an
animal? Hence, according to the law of excluded middle in
logic the term spirit will be nullified.

So when we come to monotheistic religions their chimeras

are not mostly physical but terminological; but, when we
come to polytheistic spiritualism they are as discussed above
both physical and also terminological chimeras. The invisible
god of monotheism is as a meaningless salad as the visible
physical god of polytheists made up of stolen body parts.

So the next time you hear the word spirit understand that it is
a subject without an object representing a chimera.; just
another of those words without a meaning representing an
oxymoron with opposing incompatible qualities cancelling
out each other to leave us with nothing.

84
17. Understanding the essence of nature

I recently wanted to buy a smart phone and went to a local

electronics shop while arriving; the shop keeper started to
elaborate on one of his phones responding to my request he
said This phone has a front camera of 2 Mega pixels and
back camera of 6 Mega pixels; has Wi-Fi , Bluetooth
connections ; a 4 Gb internal memory with additional 8 Gb
external memory, it can take pictures even in the dark with
good quality; it has a shock resistant touch screen and several
applications etcetc. and he went onWhat the vendor
was specifying was the design of the phone which determines
its behavior and dictates its function.

All entities within nature including humans have a designated

design which determines their function and dictates their
essence. Hence, design dictates nature; nature determines
function and essence determines behaviour. If this is soif
design determines essence, what is the design of one of the
constituents of the universe i.e. man? Can we determine the
essence of man? Can we solely attribute his behavior
exclusively to his essence? Just like the behavior of the
phone mentioned above which emanates from its design;
mans behavior also emanates from his design.

All behavioral traits and manifestations on the ground on our

planet like empirialism, racism, nationalism, terrorism,
liberalism,capitalism,individualism,totalitarianism,
humanitarianism, sadism, socialism, collectivism, atheism,
rationalism, sensationalism, subjectivism, objectivism
etcetc. and all other human behaviors exhibited by man

85
emanate from his design; which, determines his essence and
behaviour. Therefore, it is the essence of nature which shapes
the world in its own image; proving naturalism as a fact of
life.

Nature moves itself by it own essence without the need for a

master as long as it has a specific design.The first thing we
must look for in the components of nature is their design;
because, once we understand their design we can figure out
their function. As there is no entity beyond nature the pre-
occupation of man should exclusively be the understanding
of the essence of nature; in order, to usher in the era of
masterdom. The solution to all challenges we face from inter-
personal challenges, poverty, ailments, global warming,
famine etc. are natural challenges not retributions from the
gods because only intranaturalism reigns over reality.

These challenges brought about by natural forces can only be

resolved by understanding the essence of nature. When we
acquire the total cognition of the essence of nature the era of
masterdom will come about resolving all issues and turning
our livelyhood into a paradise. This is the reason why
amystology as a philosophy; pushs for and waits for that day
when man acquires absolute cognition of reality.

That being i.e. future human will be a being with absolute

intelligence and capabilities if you want to use the mystical
term god to define this being then you can use it if you like
but be careful not to lose yourself in what amystology
opposes as a school ! So lets call him a higher being instead.

86
Man will turn into a higher being from his current state as a
humanbeing in the eon masterdom solving all his issues and
satisfying all his needs; but, this era cannot manifest
overnight given the slow pace of technological progress.

I believe it is only when man masters all natural causes that

our world will turn into a mirthful realm; where diseases,
violence, conflict, wars, depression, paranoia, delusions,
famine, unhappiness and all other challenges disappear to be
replaced by buxom, serenity,harmony, mental health,
plenitude and joy. This can only happen if we first embrace
the fact essence entails behavior. In a cascade formation;
this concept can be demonstrated as:

design>nature>essence>behaviour.

Amystology embraces the above mentioned concept and as a

philosophy promotes values which are salutary and
salubrious to humanity. For example, mystics promote
martyrdom, nebeism, spiritualism, masochism, and
totalitarianism; amystology promotes masterdom, ebeism,
naturalism, salubrism and liberalism.

Some readers might find some terms in CAMIDRCS

literature like masterdom, nebeism, ebeism, intranaturalism
etc unintelligible and say what the heck do they mean? So let
me elaboratemasterdom is a state in time where man
acquires the understanding of all natural causes. Nebeism
means non-evidence based existence; which is promoted by
mystics which amystology rejects. Ebeism means evidence
based existence which is the foundation pillar of amystology
and intranaturalism is a concept which states that; one natural
87
force is the mover of another within the exclusive realm or
domain of nature.

Now, lets come back to the topic at hand which is

understanding the essence of nature. As I was saying earlier
the very design of entities finally determines their behavior.
In order, to solve mans challenges in nature first he has to
understand his nature and the nature of other components of
the natural world. Then, by acquiring the state of masterdom
he can use this potential i.e. know how to manipulate nature
to his interest.

Hence, without understanding nature and her laws there is no

salvation to mankind. It is the ignorance of the natural world
which is causing all human sufferings. If we had the
technology for curing AIDS our fellow humans need not
suffer; if we had interstellar traveling technology to travel to
the recently discovered earths twin planet Kepler-452b
announced by NASA on july 23 2015 we would have gone
there already.

If we had the technology to cure Alzeimers people need not

lose their mental weal; if we had the technology to cure death
our loved ones need not die; if we had the technology for
effective human engineering people can travel to outterspace
to visit other worlds in a cyborg form liberated from their
human physical structure, defect and short comings.

So what we need is more understanding of the essence of

nature our true creator; in order, to make our lives happier.
This might sound very strange or weird for some people but I
valiantly say without a nano-second hesitation that Science is
88
the one which is the systematic study of God (mystical term
for personified nature) i.e. nature. The problem with
humanity is that they mystify, personify and spiritualize
natural phenomena and processes; but we must remember
that there is nothing mystical or spiritual about nature. Nature
is not a person. It is a force which determines us all.
Mysticism and spiritualism derail us from the true nature of
nature which is purely material in essence and can only be
understood objectively.

Our metaphysical principle must ofcourse, be naturalism

which is the 4 th value of amystology; ( See table 1.1) by
utilizing the above mentioned value we must study nature
and uncover its secrets and liberate ourselves from the
ignorance which has clouded and entangled our minds in
confusion leading us astray to the cult of spurious idealism.

The rise of athesim and commonsense globally is not due to

the success of naturalism; but, due to the failure of
mysticism. People have come to realize that what they have
been told to embrace since infancy till the age of
commonsense; all that totalitarian fiction that their
forefathers and fathers imposed upon them doesnt really
work or make any sense at all.

They will come to realize that everything seems to be

conspiring against their liberation, enlightenment, preoption,
wellbeing and even existence, to keep them ensnared to
authoritarian dictums either coming from the state or from
the church. Their innately objective minds report to them the
devastation that their prejudicied opinions has brought forth

89
on their minds and bodies urging them to come back to their
senses; in order, to salvage themselves and discern their true
origins. Finally, at the end of it all they understand that the
beliefs and opinions that they have been holding by fear-grip
is nothing but a sheer lie.

The ignorance of nature has and is creating an avalanche of

sham beliefs, cults, customs and pseudosciences which are
creating havoc in human societies throughout the world.
Notwithstanding, the cumbersome and challenging nature of
understanding the essence of nature, technology is the only
tool we have in order to make ourselves self-sufficient.

Dont personify nature! (i.e. dont create

gods!)

Dont mystify nature! (i.e. dont establish

systems of worship!)

Dont spiritualize nature! (i.e. dont worship

nature!)

Just understand objectively the essence of nature

and its laws which determine us all!

90
18. Creationism: The big bunk theory._The systematic
floundering and derrangement._The refugee for the
perplexed and the deluded

Creationism as a dissertation of ignorant peasants is no more

than a speculation and fabrication asserted by conjecture and
maintained by force. When Abraham the so called founder of
all the Abrahamic religions and their several branches of
spiritual mysticism started to hear voices of a character
which he called god telling him to sacrifice his own son;
mysticism at that very moment stopped becoming a
rudimentary philosophy and became an impairment.

There are the desendents of this primordial patient in the 21st

century who hear voices, see images of non-existent entities
who instead of being incarcerated are revered as saints, gurus
and holy men by vulgars and intellectually shallow lay men
who due to their sluggishness did not bother to empower
themselves with wisdom and truth; to understand the
fictiverness of immateriality.

These zealous and dotting sentinels adore what should be

regarded as tommyrot and abhorable. Human intellectual
development did not just happen over night but was a gradual
progress from an intrepid cave man to a more or less sapient
ape compared to his ancestors; who, dwelled in confusion
and ineptitude primordially experimenting with ideas; in
order, to augment their understanding of nature and
environmental manifestations man invented numerous
theories and numerous systems. Creationism as one of them
91
may be held laudable if we existed at the time of Abraham;
where, man was dwelling in a nebula of darkness, ignorance
and scientific backwardness.

But as we can notice Creationism is a theory which gradually

and progressively was proven wrong and it will continue to
do so to the future, until man realizes that he is the work of
natural forces not a design of a super natural deity.

How can an entity possibly occupy space outside space?

Possess time outside time? Interact with a domain outside a
domain? Where space and time are exclusively found and are
the exclusive dimensions of reality. Hence, existence super
or outside nature is a logical impossibility.

The more we discover facts the more Creationism dies out

with all its evil tentacles; when people get sophisticated;
when they dare to doubt, read and empower themselves the
more they will be able to tell between mysticism and
naturalism; we dont have a savoir and redeemer except our
level of understanding of the natural world.

Natural science is the savior of humanity. Naturalism is the

correct path and true principle an individual could ever
possess; naturalism, has always proven us right in denoting
that natural manifestations have natural causes; whereas,
mysticism has always proven us wrong in deducing without a
shred of evidence that natural manifestations have super
natural cause.

Creationism with all its tumultous sects which never cease to

slaughter each other on mere speculative opinions; is not a
92
theory which is waiting to be substansiated and proven true
with evidence; but, an already failed hypothesis and a proven
physical and mental infirmity.

The so called revelations that creationism proposes are

nothing but dissertations of Iron Age contemplators; rather,
than words of a celestial creator; where in these texts a
sapient individual sees the subconscious mind of a medieval
savage and brute; than, an enlightening speech of an extra-
ordinary intelligent celestial deity. The self-proclaimed
intermediaries claim of revelations is another attempt of
effrontery deception forwarding their own dissertations as
revelations.

Human beings are naturally engineered to perceive and

conceive exclusively material entites within the realm of
nature. If an entity is imperceivable and incomprehendable;
then, it automatically becomes a non-entity or futile to
mankind. There are no buts or if because when it comes to
reality; we, with our five senses are the measuring stick to
judge what is real or reverie.

If man is engineered by nature to perceive only material

entities then, how is it possible to perceive let alone conceive
a non- material entity? How can we relate matter with a
spirit a word which does not have any meaning; a word
without a representative object within the realm of reality; a
subject without an object? Creationism is an art of self-
contradiction and tenacity. Man is built for matter and matter
builds man. Man is not built for spirituality but for
materialism. Man does not possess a spirit but a

93
consciousness; which is hundred percent matter itself. The
ignominy and ignorance that people have for and about
matter is the very factor which creates mysticism.

Matter itself is omnipotent enough to create all the various

magnificent manifestations that we behold. If matter was
created then, it must be destructible; if it had a beginning, it
must have an end. But evidently matter is self-existent, self-
evident and self-competent eternal non-destructible entity.

Creationism has been in a gradual death since its invention

thousand years ago till the present day and the formulation of
The Law of conservation of mass has killed it for good; the
dissertation of ancient peasants has been replaced by the
cogent and irrefragable theory of materialism. The ugly and
depressing truth is becoming more palatable than the fake
consolation and optimism promoted by mysticism. You can
rejoice about the fact that you are an eternal being in one
form or another. Finally, it will be laudable to proclaim that
reason is our savior and naturalism the true redeemer of
humanity.

Unfortunately billions of people globally are

possessed by the god delusion. Thus, they do not
know what they are doing.

94
19. An invitation to apostacy: A skeptical essay about one
of the pseudosciences and heresy called theism._The
cozeners, the gullibles and the holy insanity.

Ignorance begets credulousness, arrogance and violence.The

more people are ignorant the more they are credulous.The
more erudite they are the more skeptical they get. The
epidemic of the heretic cult of faith continues to proliferate
across the earth like a cancer; flourishing, in a society where
enlightenment and skeptical inquiry have been decreed as
dirty phrases.

Nature has been derided by so many charlatans throughout

history either by spite or naivety as a collection of inert dead
matter incapable of self-actuation and evolution; which,
receives its animation from something higher than itself.
According to the immaterialist definition of this higher
entity this being is not just unknown but unknowable to a
human being given his design. Nature does move itself by its
own essence; which we witness every day; without the
precept of a super natural entity. Thus, nature is alive!

Inorder to demonstrate this claim I challenge you to

denonunce TNT (trinitrotoulene) as a useless, inert, dead
matter,ignite it and hold it in your hand firmly if you really
believe that matter is a useless and inert dust without an
essence.You will be able to change your mind or shall I say
your prejudice about the natural world, if you survive the
blast. (This is just an argument do not conduct the
experiment)

95
God is a mystical reference or appellation to nature and
theism is the apotheosis of natural forces or their
personification; which is a heresy and digression from the
true nature of nature herself. All mystics and spiritualists are
heretics they dont see nature for what it really is; according
to the law of identity (i.e. A is A.) They are the apostates of
reason and reality and apostles of instinct and insanity. They
are the real infidels who have refused to accept the clear
evidence brought on to them with bona fide. There is nothing
mystical about nature as I have said so many times elsewhere
to the boredom of the reader. Nature is purely material
operating according to natural laws which is evidently
demonstrable before our senses in our daily lives!

If a philosophy or theory ends up without a representative

object in the objective world, then it ends up joining the
category of whimism or idealism rather than realism. A
believer is a deluded man; to believe is to be illuded and to
have faith is to have a delusion. Dupes arrogantly hold on to
their either discredited or unverified beliefs that they blindly
inherited from their forefathers or that they bought from
impostors.

They can be represented in an analogy with a maniac who

continues to push on a door despite the presence of a clear
sign which says pull. He ignores the clear red sign stuck on
the door; instead he trusts his intuition and holds on to his
faith that he has been warned to hold firm by whimologists
that the door will open inwards and continues to bang on the
door.

96
How can we explain this type of creature? Can we say that he
is totally out of his mind? His nihilistic and sensational
behaviour is disturbing for us to observe of course; but in
addition, if we observe diligently we understand that he is in
a state of which I call banemania [1] fobbed by the bin-laden
effect [2].

The fact that the door does not open inspite of his relentless
effort is not seen by him as an erroneous approach and
discouragement giving him the heed he desperately deserves
to come to his senses but a sign that he is a weak believer
demanding a requisite even for more delusion and
whimology.

This is how devastating and dangerous the ideology of faith

isit is going to enslave you to ridiculous inane ideas and
your own figments until you die! They want you to be in
absolute thralldom to their authoritive obsessed personality.

Cozeners (i.e. founders of whimsical sciences) dont really

care about humanity, their obsession is with their empire that
they are salivating to build by millions of gullibles and
minions who praise their name and spread their fame from
one corner of the planet to the other by peaceful means or
otherwise. They dont care about the bliss of man, his success
or his masterdom.

Despite the presence of clear evidence of bones and fossils;

believers like to hold on to pipe line dreams. Despite the
presence of attestments incontrary to their beliefs they keep
on maintaining their erroneous attitudes with a smirk on their
faces like retarded idiots. Just like the example of the man
97
who continues to bang on the door like an outraged zombie.
They continue in their path bringing devastation upon
themselves and distress upon observers.

Seeing their social order that they formulate; above

everybody else is their primary agenda; they, are pre-
occupied by questions likehow can I create more deluded
followers? How can I ressurrect a massive army to take over
the planet? And so on. They are concerned about their fame
and surface area of their empire; whether, or not their social
system and ideology is based on truth and salubrity of all
mankind; this is how misanthropic they are in regard to
humanity; even though, they like to clothe themselves in the
Red cross humanitarian T-shirts handing out free meals for
flood victims to present themselves as philanthrophic.

Man is actuated by his nature in particular and whole nature

in general. There is no reason for him to believe in anything.
All actuating forces are demonstrable, palpable and
understandable. Natural phenomena are absolutely
comprehendable to our material consciousness. There is no
need for us to swallow mysterious incomprehedable
doctrines and principles by the order of frowning idealists,
mystics and spiritualists (i.e. whimologists).

Nature our creator is purely material! We should not

personify, mystify and spiritualize it. We just have to
objectively investigate the domain of reality to understand all
natural causes to relieve ourselves from befuddlement and
suffering.

98
If you ask an ordinary mystic on the street why he is a Hindu,
Buddhist, Christian, Scientologist, Rastafarian, and Muslim?
Their eyes role in confusion and he might answer I dont
know, because it is my family heritage." or he might say I
dont know because it is cool?! or he might say because it
is comfortable, therapeutical, and feels good etc. He does
not really give you a resounding sensible response. Most
believers dont even understand their faith! They dont get
the mythical nature of what they have accepted by habit from
their forefathers and see no reason to examine it. They may
be attracted towards faith because of desperation and the
need for relief from emotional, economic, health etc.
challenges and misfortunes.

Most believers cant even read what their scriptures say and
understand what they stand forthey just trust the so called
ambassadors (i.e. prophets and priests) of God in translating
their meanings for them.There are billions of gullibles who
believe in Islamic mythology for examplefrom these
believers most of them cant even read and understand the
position of the Quran and they have no idea who wrote it ;
what it stands for and represents to see its vision for the
society and social order. They believe just by habit. Islamic
mythology which emanated from Muhammeds whim is no
different than any other branch of mysticism or non-evidence
based pseudoscience.

All mystics share the same abhorrence towards reason,

individuality, pre-option, liberty, reality and truth; despite,
the discord among themselves about which whim is the
greatest reverie and road towards redemption. A sensible
99
man might ask how differrent beliefs can be righteous at the
same time despite having different systems of worship;
different gods and accusing each other of heresy? Which
system is real and which one is not? Which god is real and
which one is not? So he will begin to have doubts!

Many children of differrent faiths are raised since infancy

being told that others are infidels and their faith is
unique, special, and the chosen one Their rational
mind will be coddled to dormancy by romantic fables,
supressed by terror and fettered by totalitarianism to make
them perfect subjects to their faiths. But sooner or later they
will realize that the church and the state are their rancorous
enemies comploting against their liberty, enligthenment,
empowerment, serenity and even life. They will notice that
irresistable pulse in their clergy to enslave them to their
volitions and doctrines; to proscribe their journey towards
pure reason and naturalism to see the world for what it is
according to the law of identityA is A. Because they (i.e.
the state and the church) understand that an empowered man
is unslaveable.

Here is a book and a philosophy for the liberated men and

individuals who are free thinkers, atheists, agnostics,
amystics and so on; which, is an anti-mystical literature in
particular and anti-pseudoscience in general; which,
perlustrates, exposes and denounces all non-evidence based
concepts, claims and schools of thoughts which are contrary
to the nature of reality.While, promoting pure reason,
naturalism and eusciences.

100
The propaganda of the cozeners, the number of the gullibles,
and the cases of insanity seems to increase everyday but
hopefully people will come to their senses and realize that
apostacy is a commendable and salutary action.While,
infidelity is a righteous virtue; which, protects us from
whimism and the holy insanity.

Apostasy is a valor and a necessity!

Belief is a dirty word!

Natural science is the only salvation for

mankind!

[1]: An irressistable pulse to destroy ones life by a pseudoscience.

[2]: Is a state of mind of being, persuaded by terrorism or optimism rather than

ebeism.

101
20. God has a begining: God is a pseudonym for prophets
themselves or anyone who dictates precepts on his behalf
[Part-I]

The term God has been abused by many throughout history

sometimes as a pseudonym for the so called prophets
themselves or anyone who used it as a scarecrow to dictate
their social policies and satisfy their interests. Hence, this
character that prophets and their gullible slaves talk about
has a beginning.

I am not stating that I dont have a cause. I do have a cause or

reason for my existence; but, that cause is something I am not
acquianted with yet and I dont know what it is. But, it has to
be a natural cause force or law because of the exclusivity of
nature herself.

Spiritual idealists found inventing something higher than

them to gain more acceptance by people a necessity; in order,
to reign their social order and impose it on society. All
religions are the invention of men not revelations. These
social systems are not revelations but dissertations devised by
cunning impostors. Therefore, when you embrace Islam you
are enslaving yourself to mohammedocracy; when you
embrace Christianity you are enslaving yourself to whoever
wrote the Bible; when you embrace Buddhism you are
enslaving yourself to Buddacracy not to almighty god as
you have been fobbed to think.

102
If there was a true god outside matter as theologians profess
then, he would have had a single visage. The fact that we had
and have thousands of gods is evidence by itself that it is a
fictional scarecrow invented by the human mind. Then, why
do people invent gods albeit they know that it is fictional?
According to my analysis the answer seems to be three
things.

1. Fear: Humans as evolved creatures are metaphorically like

orphans abandoned in a train station. Who have no idea what
to make of their surrounding. We exist in a strange and
mysterious universe that we know little about; we dont
know totally our origins; our purpose; and environment.
Hence, we feel frightened and lonely. When people are afraid
and lonely they invent imaginary friends. If you have
observed people in solitary confinement it is their behavior to
draw or make objects to befriend. In a gigantic scale humans
as orphans in the universe have invented physical or
imaginary God to reduce their anxiety of ignorance.
Therefore, behind every God that is created; there, is a man
who is the creator.

2. Ignorance: In the polytheist systems of ancient Middle

East and Europe due to the abnormally high rate of ignorance
at that time; people had gods for pretty much every aspect of
life. For agriculture, farming, war, rain, ocean, fertility,
persuasion, thunder, medicine, sun, the underground, women
etc. As human understanding of these sectors grew; when
man mastered agriculture, fertility, rain and the oceans etc.;
then the need for gods died out with the ignorance. No more
sacrifice, worship, supplication was necessary anymore, they
103
were discarded and replaced by natural understanding. The
mountain of unknowns that humans face is getting smaller
and smaller as time and technology progresses forward.

The only god left is the god of the universe; we are at the age
of monotheism rather than polytheism. So that name tag
plastered on the universe by idealists will still persist until we
totally comprehend the origins of the universe; at that
moment the monotheistic god will be abandoned and
replaced by natural understanding and self-esteem.

3. Uncertainity: In an age where reason has been abandoned

as a means of certitude people are trusting their whims and
caprice. People seem to be uncertain about so many things
we are not even certain that we can live the next day. We
gain an illusion of certainty and fool ourselves by sticking
stickers of gods in our car for example to have a feeling of
certainty and a safe journey. We have a fetish for
superstitious physical objects whether it is the cross, the
Wailing Wall or the Kabba to relieve ourselves of the anxiety
of uncertain life events.

Therefore, the above mentioned reasons seem to be some of

the factors responsible as ingredients for the creation of gods.
As long as these factors remain in the society there will
always be a god. I dont really understand why we have a
field called Theology which studies ignorance; because god
is the expression of ignorance/incapacity/befuddlement and
weakness within human nature. How can there be a field
which is dedicated to human incapacity? It does not make
any sense at all.

104
In monotheistic religions theologians made god an imaginary
being from his previous polytheistic statue state; which is
defenseless against gravity and the elements it supposedly
created. Hence, in order to make spiritual idealism
convincing to the public spiritualists made the modern day
god invisible without any direction or place of abodement;
through mystifying god they aspired to maintain and preserve
the influence of theology and its power in the society.

They want us to cogitate the unperceivable, praise the

invisible, supplicate the unknowable. They want us to waste
away physically and mentally in absolute devotion to an
imaginary figure. The want us to enslave ourselves to our
own minds. If this is so, then theology is an open invitation to
morbidity and mortality.

When we analyze the society we find no one death loving

than mystics. They have lost themselves in their imagination
to the extent that they just cant wait till they join the
dimension that they adore so much which is the realm of
non-existence.

They say that the new god of monotheism is imperceivable

to man due to mans inferiority. If so, then the entire fable
riddled establishment of religion needs to be discarded;
because, an inferior unperceiving man and a perceiving
superior god can never have a communication, conversation
or a day of judgement and restitution.

Man can only perceive what is real and existent. Where there
exists only one dimension; the dimension of reality. You can
choose to perceive it or choose to enslave yourself to your
105
imagination to walk around in the world in a state of delirium
and finally, conclude your existence by martyrdom to
nothingness. Delirium is the suspension of reason and a first
step in a descent towards non-existence.

Mystics tell us to smother the cry of our critical faculty and

submit in silence to their doctrines and assert what they
vociferate is the word of god. If so why do we have many
Spiritualists in dissention among one another quarreling
which text is the word of god? How can God contradict
himself and have different messengers in dispute among
each other? Accusing each other of infidelity and heresy?
Doesnt this quarrel seem a quarrel of competition of
philosophers for global domination rather than an aspiration
for the redemption of mankind?

Some mystics say god is one; but others beg to differ waving
around their handful polytheist gods. Some mystics profess
that god does not beget or is born; but fellow Augurs of
Roman mysticism dissent bitterly because in their version of
mysticism Jupiter is the son of Saturn. Some state that god is
unique and has no equivalent but again fellow flamen
maiores who served the archaic triad in ancient Rome will
disagree and provide equivalents of their own.

The field of idealism or mysticism in general is so

contradictory that it crummbles on itself due to its own
weight without a need for a critic. The claims they suppose
cancel out each other exposing what it is a nothing. They
say that god is the all mover and intervenes in our daily lives
as if the universe is a dead and motionless entity which

106
derives its motion from a figment of our imagination; as if it
is sensible for matter to stop for a moment and consult god
on which direction to go and what to do next? Even if we
consider their argument for a second and ask them how god
moves the world? They have no clear answer they just keep
on paralyzing our critical faculty by nebulous responses and
terrorism.

The domain of the theologian is the imaginary mind.

Evidently, there were and are people today who are ignorant
of natural causes and despise the scientific method of
investigating true causes since the ancient Romans until
today. They say that it is impiety, vituperation, blasphemy
not to lose yourself in delirium according to their
prescription. To even be critical and analyze the physical god
who cant defend itself from gravity; if it fell or the
imaginary god which cant defend itself from reason. If I
cannot analyze god how can I understand what it is? They
frown upon any cognitive function concerning their god and
terrorize us citing the fate of Prodicus of Ceos and Socrates
whose critical faculties where too radical for the Athenian
government.

The word of oracles is embraced as the word of god; their

policies as policies of god; delirium is replaced in place of
vivacity; psychosis is held in high regard than buxom;
totalitarianism replaces individuality; terrorism replaces
aspirationalism; rituals replace research; tribulation replaces
serenity; worship replaces industriousness; alternative
medicine replaces true medicine; concupiscence becomes a
crime than a delectation; self-preservation is replaced by self-
107
mortification to a sacrifice loving god Dracula starting from
innocent children i.e. that of son of Abraham to critics,
freethinkers, realists, atheists, agnostics, and even other
mystics. So mystics do not even spare their own kind being a
believer cannot save you from other believers. What a
predicament! The vision of mystics for a society is so dark,
nauseating and loathsome.

The history of sacrifice goes back even before monotheism in

ancient greece emperor Marcus aurelius used to sacrifice a
white castrated Ox! For Jupiter; because, of his success in the
battle fields; as if a white marble had something to with his
victories. Eventhough, the neo-mystics of today designate the
ancient mystics as pagans they are identical.They want you to
believe their version of mysticism is unique in order to sell
their version of mysticism more than their predecessors.

The Saturn of yesterday has been replaced by the Jesus,

Allah, Buddha and Shiva of today. Superstition and
mythology have no distinction throughout history it is all the
same. Mytsics commits what I call the fallacy of misplaced
attribution which means that due to lack of understanding of
natural causes they attribute effects to irresponsible causers.

What type of merciful and loving god massacres his own

intelligently designed creatures by famine, earthquakes,
tsunamis, tornados and pestilence? Lets now see what god is
according to their definition. Islamic mythology tries to
define it just by four sentences in the Quran at chapter 112.
So the formerly inexplicable infinite god all of a sudden
becomes explicable in just four sentences! Yes! The

108
contradictions in mythology are overwhelming because, of its
nothingness. God is a pacifier for adult children and a
scarecrow for little children who are entangled in fear and
befuddlement of this mysterious universe. As I stated earlier
there is no difference between god Marduk, god Saturn, god
Ashur, god Enlil, god Zeus, god Jupiter, god Jesus, god Shiva
or god Allah. They are all expressions of human limitations
and inventions.

If this is the case wouldnt it be absurd for me to embrace

any form of mythology and in the process consecrate, adjure,
worship, fear, my own inventions? The modern day Augurs
give us a fleer when we start to be reasonable because they
know that their myths and doctrines are mirages impotent
against reason. They want to defend their irrational systems
by irrational attitudes.

Let them have their sneer; we will have our reason and we
will see who prevails and who vanishes. These obscurants
tell us that this planet is providence and a blessing from
almighty god to his beloved slaves so that we can be
grateful to our creator day in and day out. In a world of
species cannibalism where one species is actually designed to
devour another just to survive; how, can we honestly say that
it is a providence and blessing for all species? Where the
misfortune of certain animals is a fortune for others?

Holiness is a mental blindness; a man without reason is like a

saw machine without an operator. The term holy
immediately suspends reason and makes any behavior; it
does not matter how heinous it may be acceptable and moral

109
when it is written side by side next to other words like holy
bribe, holy sacrifice, holy land, holy water, holy bread, holy
wine, holy blood, holy carcasses, holy oil, holy
embezzlement, holy rape, holy war, holy king and so on.

If god was beyond human comprehension and material

senses; why did he labor to create us with a rational mind?
Mythologists as human beings themselves try to define their
indefinable immaterial god via attributes and meditate upon
his incomprehendable greatness by their uncomprehending
mind.

Considering that nobody has a free will including the devil

himself except the will of god how can there be this thing
called a sin? How can entities below god commit a sin
without a free will? If you state that the devil has a free will
and can rebel independently against god to mislead humans
then you are placing the devil above god. How can humans
be held accountable for their actions that they are not
willing? Wouldnt it be sensible to accuse god himself who
has an absolute monopoly on volition as the villain?
Therefore, if humans cannot be held accountable for their
actions then there will not be a day of judgement; no hell or
heaven.

Further, analysis of Christian mythology brings out so many

points; for instance a god bigger than the universe wants to
impergnate a women smaller than a boulder in order to create
god junior whom he sacrifices for humans that are commiting
sins that they cant will. Is this a sapient plan on the behalf of
God? Why does God need a sex scene considering his purity

110
from animal nature? Because lewd is a nature reserved only
for our kind. Why does it have to be a gestation? Why not
say let there be Jesus! And he might have been? I dont see
the point where God lowers his dignity to animals of our
species to beget a son.

You might say god works in mysterious ways! Well, why

then he due to his mercifulness; make our life on planet earth
mysteriously lax and blissful? Mystics state that god is the
all knower; he knows everything if this is the case then why
would he bother to create a universe which he already knows
the outcome of? Following this contradictions god is an
impossible character to exist. Theology as an art of
contradiction; it is more of an entertainment to its audiences
that a means of empowerment.

Religion is a legalized mental illness guarded by the state and

revered by the vulgars. Its proposal for a way life is simple
indolence and self-thralldom to chimeras that we create
ourselves; rather than investigating our real origin and nature
of reality.

The word of Oracles must be taken as the word of God and

their caprice as the rule of law. Some might argue if we
abolish religion in particular and idealism in general from the
world; anarchy will reign and there will neither be morality
or ethics and peace to mankind. But my argument against this
idea is let us observe the most religious part of the world to
verify the fact that religion brings about peace and morality
let us go to Jerusalem the so called melting pot of religion.
We observe since the incipience of religiousity in this north

111
eastern part of Asia it has been the most unstable, violent,
sanguine place on earth stained by the blood of thousands
throughout history until this very day. Jerusalem has been the
melting pot of carcasses rather than seemingly peaceful
religions.

So the argument that without religion the world will descend

into chaos and ochlocracy is unreasonable given the above
evidence. Actually the world is in chaos and ochlocracy due
to the presence of religion. Jews, Christians, and Muslims
fighting amongst themselves and one another based on a
dispute on novels. I am not saying that abolishing religion as
a mental illness will bring about absolute peace to mankind
because there still will be other reasons of possible conflicts
like nationalism, racism, resources, sexism, power, etc. but
what I am saying is that at least people will stop killing each
other for fictional inane theories and violence will be reduced
drastically because the motive for violence based on fiction
will disappear.

Others might argue if we abolish religion; life will be boring

and meaningless there will be no Passover, Shavout,
Epiphany, Christmas, Easter, ID-alfitr, Diwali and no
massacring infidels so it will be quiet, peaceful and boring.
My response to this argument will be what will be more
meaningful than uncovering the truth? What could be more
meaningful than uncovering our true origin rather than
fooling ourselves with inane superstituous systems? What
could be meaningful than unraveling the mysteries of the
natural world? So my counter offer is let us be mature

112
enough to ditch our toys and sedulous enough to figure out
our true origin.

21. Banemania: The irresistable impulse to destroy ones

life with a pseudoscience

Banemania is another term I coined to describe the attitudes

and irresistible impulse of mystics to bring bane on their
bodies and wellbeing. The tenacity to which they hold on to
mythical doctrines due to a lack of commonsense and reason
to analyze that nature is not mystical, spiritual or non-evident
causes them to blindly and impulsively drive themselves by
instincts like a lower animal rather than employing their
reason like a higher animal.

It is in the desert of ignorance where the thorn of faith and

pseudosciences flourishes. The need to believe arises from
the need to establish a pseudoscientific cult. Evidence based
sciences have no pre-requisition or a pre-condition for faith.
Whereas; pseudoscientific cults have a precondition of faith
because they are lies!

Faith itself can be a tell-tale sign of pseudoscience; nihilistic

mental and psychological attitudes are exhibited by
pseudoscientists; rather, than a calm objective and rational
attitude because they lack evidence and most
pseudoscientists are legal mental patients. Observe their
behaviour for yourself! And you will discover a personality
emotionally and psychologically severly disturbed and in dire
need of salubrism.
113
Mystics have destroyed themselves in an attempt to personify
and deify nature into a person. So that they can have a
communication to amend their livelyhood by prayers,
repentance, and sacrifices as if nature is a person.They have
discovered the dimension of delusion and schizophrenia
destroying their health and wellbeing.

Protestant churches and other similar houses of legalized

colleges of insanity have created more mental patients
suffering from hallucinations; schizophrenia and the Jesus
delusion. Nature will chastise anyone who digresses from
naturalism either by destroying their health or other
consequences.

Mystics suffer from all types of illnesses from gastritis due to

excessive fasting to please an angry personified nature; to
psychosis, delusions, hallucinations, and other forms of
illnesses that were mentioned earlier. I dont really
understand why people are having a hard time trying to
distinguish something which works from something which
doesnt? Is analyzing a theory for its efficacy challenging? It
is the simplest thing ever! We just need to utilize our
commonsense and skeptical merciless minds! A question
might arise in this current moment which is; what level of
intelligence do we really have nowadays to distinguish fact
from fiction? Is it so low that it incapacitates us of sensible
judgment? Are people becoming indolent to enlighten
themselves with wisdom? Is the agony of empowerment
forbidding people from being erudite?

114
Do they not have time to do so in this hectic 21st century life
style and ending up dimwit and subordinates of zealous
impostors? Who like in the games of little children; who play
the patient and the doctor; they order medicines which are
ridiculous in nature like holy water, holy egg of an eagle or
an ostrich to be drunk to cure diseases ranging from asthma
to HIV/AIDS and other preposterous remedies like crocodile
body parts and other mystical treatments; which makes
people even more morbid psychologically and physically.
Hence, the answer to all of the above mentioned questions
may be yes! It is only when people become ignorant that
pseudosciences and mysticism fester in the society.

Hence, the cure for ignorance is hard work and

enlightenment; but I believe it is not hard to tell apart
efficacy from spuriousness; if, we are really erudite and most
importantly mentally healthy. How hard could it be to tell
apart astrology from astronomy; alchemy from chemistry;
phrenology from psychology; non-evidence based medicine
like ayurveda, homeopathy, faith healing, dianetics,
naturopathy, iridiology, reflexology, chinese medicine,
vitalism, acupuncture, cupping therapy and other
pseudosciences disguised as religions like Islam, Christianity,
etc.. And so forth from the evidence based mainstream
medicine and evidence based Sciences?

I believe it is the dearth of commonsense and intelligence

which makes people fall for befuddling inane theories. If I
decided to delve and describe every pseudoscience I believe
it would be like taking a tour inside a disoriented
mind.Therefore, I will leave the job of understanding every
115
pseudoscientific cult which were mentioned above to the
reader because, frankly I dont want to be infected and
contaminated by the ideas of pseudo-nonsense.

It is not salutary for my wellbeing; nor, does it have the

capability to enlighten my ignorant and callow ape brain;
diagnosing pseudosciences requires only as stated above your
commonsense. Calmly analyze the theory and its evidence
that it forwards; if it has onebut most pseudosciences never
do! Thats why they are called pseudosciences.

Therefore, this impulse to destroy oneself with pseudoscience

emerges from mental illness or from the ignorance of people;
most followers of pseudosciences dont even understand
what they are following! Hence, we need to empower
ourselves as much as we can to separate ourselves from the
lower animals who are blinded by instinct and sensationalism
animated by caprice and irreason driving themselves and
anyone who they can graboff into the abyss of
extermination.

Individuals possessed by banemania dont really have a

functioning reason which operates; to see their digressions
and heresy from naturalism. Sensationalism antagonizes
reason it forces it shut down; so that the weeds of
pseudoscientific doctrines take root in a mind where there is
no gardener i.e. reason to pluck out those poisoness weeds
that have grown up and which are being maintained and
sustained by slothfulness.

The mind of a sloth is infested with mystical stories of spirits,

demons, gods, etc. realistic concepts of the cosmos are
116
basically non-existent in his mind. He rushs to attribute the
cause of manifestations to fictional characters which only
exist in his mind; because, the ignorance of natural causes
has left a vacancy in his awareness where insubstantial
subjects have taken root.

All pseudosciences starting from spiritualism which includes

all religions throughout history to material mysticisms are
products of lower intelligence. If the founders of these cults
had higher intelligence they need not have diverted to
impalpable explanations for palpable manifestations. They
need not have digressed to sensationalism but to reason; if
their claims were really true. Pseudoscience may probably be
the cause of the 6th extinction.

117
22. The Bin-laden effect

The bin-laden effect is another term I coined to define a

psychological state of mind given to us by mystical and
pseudoscientific institutions. This state of mind is a feeling
we get when confronted by mystical and pseudoscientific
doctrines or claims. These institutions exhibit splendor
infrastructures and worship establishments which can be
equated with castles. They appear and express humbleness by
donating charity and exhibiting selflessness. They exhibit
terrorism to shock our souls into submission. They might
also exhibit piles of mystical literatures which can be used as
door stoppers; which, are inculcated with contradictions and
meaningless insubstantial twaddle.

The combination of terrorism, lustre, litreature and

humbleness are the four wheels which mystical and
pseudoscientific instituions carry themselves inorder to give
themselves a sense of legitimacy without bothering
themselves with providing evidence. So that we can fall for
their claims; humbleness, terrorism, lustre and sominferous
literatures; which, cannot be a replacement for
evidence/demonstrability/efficacy. Those who fall for the
Bin-laden effect are called believers and those who dont are
called skeptics.

So next time you visit the Vatican or the blue mosque (i.e.
Sultan ahmet) in turkey the feeling you get is the bin-laden
effect.The marvels of the architecture paralyze your reason
and you start to fall for mystical and pseudoscientific bosh. If
you have noticed very carefully the attitudes of mystics they

118
either try to look resplendent, humbble, erudite or ferocious;
while missing the huge gist which is evidence.

Despite their fradulent nature these institutions seem genuine

to our mesmerized brain. A brain abused by resplendence,
humbbleness, inane litreature, and terror. The 2007 Makkah
Grand mosque fourth extension project for example which is
estimated to last till 2020 costed 10.6 billion US dollars. If,
for instance, the millions of dollars spent in lustre projects in
the name of personified nature (i.e. god) throughout the
world was instead used to fund naturalism (i.e. research and
development) to cure cancers,alzheimers, AIDS, and other
human challengesour planet would have been a better
place.

Instead of investing billions into splendor establishments of

worship of personified nature like idiots! That we are not!
We must invest that money into the study of the principles of
nature; in order, to understand it and utilize that
understanding to make ourselves happier and relieve
ourselves from suffering. Can you image if the Grand
mosque of Mecca was a meeting ground for millions of
researchers throughout the world; an institution like the
house wisdom rather than a place of worship of nature? The
amount of solutions that could have been created would have
been enormous!

Similarly, if the millions of dollars of moneybeing

channeled to terrorist groups in the name of personified
nature (i.e. god) by tycoons who think they are fulfilling the
word of god. If the funds injected to the so called holy wars

119
and holy terrorisms to create havoc and human suffering on
earth was channeled into R&D (research and development) to
create relief and bliss how happy humanity could have
been?!

If the ink spelt to inscribing nonsensical twaddle was used

instead to inscribe the principles of nature. To uncover its
operations; and to demystify its essence in order to enlighten
and empower all of humanity about the true nature of their
creator without mystical and spiritual digressions and
heresyhumanity could have seen a better day.

Reason and evidence must be our indispensible tools to

analyze hypothesis, theories and claims because nature has
evidence for all its operations. We should never fall for the
splendor, humbleness, inane scripts, and terror posed by
claimants. We should not be the victims of the Bin-laden
effect.

We must trust our reason and even analyze our own nature
and behaviour to prove to ourselves the soverignity of nature
(i.e. that we are determined by our natural design and all
manifestations have attestments).We will realize and discern
the fact that we are determined by our nature entailing the
deduction that nature is the only determining force.

Therefore, verifying the fact that nature possesses evidence

for all its operations. The workings of nature may be
challenging to comprehend but it is never mysterious,
spiritual or mystical.The workings of nature are purely
material, natural and self-evident waiting to be unravelled by
valiant and skeptical investigators.The only leash holding us
120
back from progress and happiness is our low intelligence;
which, deserves to be enhanced and augmented so as to
comprehend nature faster and efficaciously.

The Bin-laden effect should not derail us from ebeism;

contradictory scriptures should not befuddle our minds into
submission to mysticism; terror should not disrupt the
functions of our reason; humbbleness should not distract us
from the true nature of pseudosciences; which, are
destructive in all threee spectrums pyschologically,
emotionally, and physically.

People who are sapient enough to save themselves from

mysticism, pseudoscience and the Bin-laden effect will be
called infidels, blasphemers and charged with impiety; but,
we must at this very point ask the question who is the real
infidel; the man who is rejecting evidence or the man who is
requesting evidence? In reality it is those mystics and
pseudoscientists who are the true infidels; the renegades of
reality and evidence for fiction and reverie.They are the ones
who refuse to see the overwhelming attestments for scientific
theories.They should be the one who should be charged with
impeity and blasphemy against reason and
commonsense.They are not either willing or sage enough to
understand the evidences brought forth by natural
investigations; the truth is either against their interests or
more sophisticated than their level of
intelligence.Therefore,when they accuse us of infidelity
which is not a legitimate litigation in the first place; we must
accuse them of delusionality.

121
23. Ethical engineering: The provenance of ethics is
biological._Morality can be contrived from a test
tube._The source of human behaviour is his
design._Morality is based on natural laws

I dont want to bore the reader with tautology but the concept
within amystology as has been said in other articles is that
man is a material being with behavior purely created by
physio-chemistry.

The reason for this conclusion is because the universe itself is

an enormous assemblage of chemicals including man
himself. Therefore, mans awareness, his mood (i.e. his joy
and his pain,) his existence (i.e. his vitality [life], his
mortality [death]) his conduct (i.e. ethics) in total can be
reduced to chemical reactions and biology.

Therefore, the understanding of chemistry can be used as a

tool for solving humanities issues and challenges including
ethics; starting from enhancing mans intellectual capacity,
behavior modification, mood enhancement, longevity and
immortality.

There is no universe, galaxy, stars, planets, human beings,

awareness, joy, pain, life or death but processes of chemistry.
Can you mention something beyond chemical? Something
which cannot be reduced to matter?

Mystics abuse our senses by questions like; is matter

conscious? How can matter move itself? How can we
formulate ethics from a test tube and from the theory of
materialism? and other statements to shake our certainty on
122
reality and the sovergnity of natureso as to doubt ourselves
and be uncertain about simple self-evident facts. This is the
trick that they play on our senses and minds in order to
inculcate their delusions and toxic immaterial nonsense into
our consciousness.

It is absolutely possible to formulate not just behaviour and

ethics from a test tube but an entire organism. For example,
whether he becomes a she or a he; has six fingers or five; has
a calm personality or a pugnacious personality; has blue eyes
or brown eyes; is black skined or white skined; is a cyborg or
a human; etc. We can practically design a humanbeing from
scratch with the desired traits and expected behaviours on the
outside world. Therefore; the source of ethics is biology.

I believe that the root of all human behaviour is biological by

editing and enhancing his natural design we can edit his
behaviour on the ground. The flaw of idealists and mystics is
that despite the presence of abhorable designs within human
nature which are responsible for heinous behaviours they try
to rectify mans behaviour by formulating commandments;
which do not address and rectify the problem at its source.

Thus, these superficial laws will be broken by the natural

design of man. We witness for example unexpected weird
behaviors like holy men sexually abusing young boys; the
most erudite intelligent men delving into turpitude and rage;
leaders of nations caught up in sex scandals; people
committing embezzlement and money laundering; people
violently massacring each other and looting each others
properties in national conflicts without mercy; sexual

123
perversions of all types; irrationality and senselessness;
malevolent humans poisoning and murdering each other and
all other ill behaviors are exhibited before us to our
repugnance. Hence, first we must understand the root of all
these human behaviors which is of course, the human design.

So, even the question of ethics itself is and can be reduced to

chemistry and natural processes which can only be answered
by biological engineering!-by rectifying what is abhorable
and enhancing what is commendable we can create better
ethical humans and a better world for our descendants.

Ethics has many branches but in general it is concerned with

what is the ideal human character and this ideal human
character can be created in the laboratory by biological
engineering. Natural science can create this ideal creature
and intelligently designed being; solving all ethical
issues.This might sound radical but given the current state of
humanity radical challenges do deserve radical solutions.

Our imagination and cognition is the limit as to what design

and behaviour the human organism should havethe
options are basically limitless.What I want to stress here is
that without ethical engineering and embracing the fact that
the source of human behaviour is biological; hence, requiring
a biological solution there will be no resolution in regard to
morality.

The world will continue as it is; inundated in war, famine,

altercations, tribulations, sufferring and tumult due to the fact
that humans have accepted to live with their imperfect
designs responsible for all these manifestations.
124
The question of morality may sound a question for the social
sciences but actually its root is in biology. Without
understanding and tweaking nature we can never formulate a
sound moral theory. All the constitutions, bill of rights,
codes, cultures, values, and regulas are basically ineffective;
if they are not in alignment with the human design; which we
already know that it has flaws and is in desperate need of
purging its defects and enhancing its strengths. The ideal
human character can be invented in the lab if we allow it.

We should save ourselves the labor of formulating

philosophies, ethical rules, norms, customs etc. and focus on
formulating the best natural blueprint from which the best
human behavior can emanate; this should be our pre-
occupation. The current human behavior itself emanates from
our natural blueprint designed by nature. This design has so
many flaws as stated above as it is observable from the
current state of our planet.

We should not be afraid to ameliorate the human condition

through biological engineering which I consider to be
absolutely moral.The immoral thing to do is to leave man
with his abhorable defects to suffer for their
consequences.The only moral objective is the masterdom of
man; an organism free from flaws and full of happiness.

The opposition to ethical engineering may come only from

those who either are incapable of providing efficacious
solutions to ethical issues or have an interest in the
derailment of human philosophy from the virtueous path of
naturalism.

125
Ask yourself these questions why do idealists and mystics
oppose a science which is open for new evidence? Why do
they oppose naturalism which has stated several times that; it
is open for corrigibility if new attestment is presented? Is it
logically sound to oppose something which is open for new
evidence? How can you oppose something which is not a
dogma? Their abhorance towards science and materialism
has no sound foundation at all.

For example, if you think that evolution as a theory is wrong

then why not rectify the origins of humanity by what is
trueproviding necessary evidences rather than hope and
hot air?

I believe that the normal expected behavior of a human being

should be to vehemently detest claims which do not have
evidence and which are dogmatic because they are in
contrary to our design and inconflict with our health.

Idealists and mystics without a shred of evidence

sensationally excoriate objective theories which happen to be
in contradiction to either their fables or their illusions.They
neither help out in objective investigation nor create their
own.They are like obscurant children who prohibit grown
ups from accomplishing grown up work.

Materialism is not a dogma. It is a demonstrable fact. Any

attempt to spurn naturalism is really just an attempt of
resisting reality not denying it; because, reality is not going
anywhere-anti-naturalism may exist due to lack of insight
into the workings of nature and her laws which determine us
all. Therefore, the next time you hear a reprobation of science
126
which cannot either produce evidence or logically discredit
which has already been established; consider it as nothing but
hot air. Our motto to defend ourselves from the mind tricks
of idealists and mystics should beplease produce evidence
not hot air.

By blocking our thought train by totalitarianism and shocking

our souls by terrorism they thought our mind will be ready
for their meaningless theories and delusions. So that we can
share their morbidity and be in a state of day dreaming
induced by their toxic twaddle.

Whether we like it or not reality is independent of the

observer as long as there is no evidence for us to analyze;
claims are useless to our objective minds. Hot air and hope
provided by idealists and mystics can never be entertained in
place of evidence and demonstration.Therefore, lets name
and shame those disoriented impostors as the enemies of
humanity and naturalism.

Finally, I think we must understand the axiom that we as

human beings are determined by natural laws and physio-
chemistry; our behaviour manifests as a consequence of these
laws and physio-chemical reactions. If so, then the solution
of creating a desired world can only rest on a desired design.
If we desire ethical transformation of humans we must first,
need to understand what their source of behaviour is in the
first place and devise a natural emendment to bring about a
desired ethical behaviour.

127
24- Salubrism: The righteous path and endeavour_The
critic of altruism and self-sacrifice_The ethical principle
of amystology

What could be more sensible than having a healthy respect,

love and sense of self-preservation for oneself; in contrast to
having an abnormal attitude of self-inferiority, self-loathing,
and a zeal for self-mortification?! What could be more
demented than to unconditionally surrender and sacrifice
oneself to a totalitarian deity or a states man? The exponents
of altruism i.e. idealists and mystics have always chosen
altruism over salubrism; totalitarianism over liberalism.

As an ethical principle amystology promotes Salubrism as a

principle which emphasizes self-preservation than self-
sacrifice. It teaches that the individual must pursue his
salubrity in three spectrums namely psychological salubrity,
emotional salubrity, and physical salubrity.

Therefore, salubrism can be called a well-organized rational

hedonism. Man is innately an objective animal designed
exclusively for the material world endowed with senses and a
rational faculty to make sense of reality; idealism whether,
spiritual or material is against the design and operations of
the human organism; altruistic ethics promoted by spiritual
and material idealists whether theists or communists is
extremely devastating and catastrophic to the individual and
society because an altruistic policy sabotages the ultimate
goal of self-existence.

Suffering is not a blessing! Turning yourself into a self-

mortifying anorexic monkey like Mother Teresa is not a
128
virtue but a vice. Altruistic ethics in spiritualism or
communism renders man a zombie without the capacity to
reason, deliberate and maintain his self-interest; advocating
to sacrifice ourselves to an imaginary deity or an arrogant
statesman/cult leader. These doctrines and teachings have
only ended up creating not a social bliss; but, a social
calamity with hundreds of thousands of people suffering
from schizophrenia and malnutrition. The notion of
stigmatizing selfpreservation has not created a mirthful
society but a wailing one. I do not believe that irrational self-
sacrifice is a healthy attitude; it can be equated with insanity.

Hence, maintaining psychological, emotional, and physical

salubrity is utmost important within ethics in amystology.

The 1st spectrum of salubrism which is psychological

salubrism states that the individual must maintain and sustain
his mental wellbeing.

The 2nd spectrum of salubrism states that the individual must

maintain and sustain his emotional wellbeing.

The 3rd spectrum of salubrism states that the individual must

maintain and sustain his physical buxom.

If any decision in the life of the individual does not entail any
spectrum of salubrism it will be designated as altruism;
which is an ethical value of idealists. Hence, rejected by
amystology

Amystology as an exponent of realism and materialism and

an antipathy of idealism and mysticism holds Salubrism as an

129
ethical and moral principle. Encouraging people to think and
stand for themselves and maintain their salubrity; Calling
onto them to be apostates of idealism and apostles of realism.

Altruism (self-sacrifice) which is a systematic destruction of

psychological, emotional, physical, economic as well as
social salubrity must be a form of unclassified mental illness;
because naturally we all possess a tendency of self-
preservation; nurturing and loving oneself is the true virtue; it
is only when man loves himself he can love others; it is when
he takes care of himself that he is motivated to take care of
others.

130
25. Transhumanism: The beacon of all philosophies._The
paragon of all movements._The solution of everything

As long as Transhumanism as a scientific movement aiming

to enhance and empower man in to a higher being stays
strictly materialistic and does not take a U-turn into
mysticism like Scientology-I believe it will be the paragon
of all movements in the objective sciences.

As an atheist and fervent exponent of naturalism and as an

amystologist who vehemently rejects mysticism and
idealismI believe that the understanding of all natural
causes is the solution to all humanities problems. If we
consider the maxim statement that human nature shapes the
world in its own image then it will be rational to conclude
that by manipulating and shaping human nature via
technology; we can shape the outside world according to our
desire.

What could be more sensible than to reconfigure and

redesign abhorably designed man; to liberate him from his
lower self and flaws exhibited in his makeup and in his
nature? We have already established that nature and her laws
are the exclusive metaphysical truths. Therefore, inorder to
solve any issues we are confronted within the exclusive
realm of reality that we exist in; we must approach it through
the scientific method. All challenges within the universe are
natural with a corresponding natural solution. Science and
technology are not just option B to our challenges; but the
exclusive options available to us.

131
The supernatural option A has been dead for so long
because candidly supernaturalism is a fictive tale which
died and went down to the grave with the many self
proclaimed Prophets in the Iron age. The time has long
passed for believing in fairytale concepts of salvation by
fictional characters and prophecies which will never
materialize because they dont exist in the first place. Thus,
we are left with the true creator and sovereign in existence
(i.e. nature and her laws) which is not a perfect and ideal
force; she is riddled with flaws and defects. Abhorable design
exists in pair with intelligent design in our observable
world.We are begining to understand that natural forces are
the ones at the reigns of power and government within the
universe.

We are begining to notice slowly that supernatural doctrines

are ignorance of natural causes.We are begining to notice the
absolute tyrany of natural laws which govern reality; hence,
finally reaching the conclusion that we dont have a saviour
except our understanding of natural laws. Therefore, what
could be more sensible than to support a movement dedicated
to the understanding of all natural causes within the natural
world inorder to benefit mankind and liberate it from its
shortcomings and defects.

As Baron wisely says in his preface of the System of nature

volume-I: 1770

The source of mans unhappiness is his ignorance of

Nature. The pertinacity with which he clings to blind
opinions imbibed in his infancy, which interweave themselves

132
with his existence, the consequent prejudice that warps his
mind, that prevents its expansion, that renders him the slave
of fiction, appears to doom him to continual error.

Therefore, humanity does not have an alternative which can

solve its issues and resolve its challenges except Science
which produces technology. As long as Mahadi or Jesus are
no where to be seen I will stick with naturalism and what
works efficaciously and to what I can understand as a
material animal. As I am determined by my physio-
chemistry; it will be sensible for me to support a movement
which works for the betterment of my chemical processes.
Which can enhance and transport me to the ultimate
destination of masterdom.

Man is not that different naturally from a tomato which goes

through genetic enhancement to make it a better product free
from flaws.This fence, of fear that man is something unique
and untouchable which is holding back the enhancement and
research on human beings must be demolished; because, fear
and totalitarianism are the tools of idealists and mystics who
have lost touch with reality and obsessed with misanthrophy
and the extinction of the human species.

We must teach people that they are natural products not

choosen species by a non-existent god. They as other
segments with in nature are just components of nature. The
only manner they can solve any of their issues is through
technology exclusively. Once this notion is comprehended
then I believe that man will start focusing his eyes into earth
rather than to space to look for solutions. The understanding

133
of the natural world will either elevate him into a master or
the ignorance of the natural world will reduce him into a
slave of his own imagination.

Idealism is the best example here; we see man enslaved to his

own figments behaving like a child. Whereas, in realism we
see sapient grown up human beings trying to understand and
manipulate nature to the benefit of mankind. This is where
Transhumanism comes in with reason and commonsense
encouraging people to engage the microscope and ditch the
cross or any other superstitous toy and grow up! In order to
understand the fact that natural challenges have only natural
solutions.

Let not your fear fetter you in ignorance and enslave you to
fiction and the interests of arrogant imposters who know little
of what they speak. Due to their sham theories resort to
terrorism and totalitarianism to subdue us in their social
order; I will hold your hand in support preventing you from
the abyss of idealism and pulling you up to the plateau of
realism. I will stand shoulder to shoulder in support of your
right to masterdom.You dont have anything to loose
abandoning your faith in idealism and mystical nonsense
except your puerility. I will not betray your trust like the
cozeners. I am your friend trying to save you from your
lower self.

I will extend my hand even to the idealist himself to join our

movement of natural understanding and enhancement it will
be better for him as it will be for us. Let him join us in our
endeavor and give us a hand in our toil of understanding

134
nature rather than standing aside engaging in terrorism,
sensationalism, totalitarianism and obscurancy clinging to
toys.

I myself as a founder of amystology and supporter of the

value masterdomNothing goes hand in hand with my
philosophy than Transhumanism; because naturalism is the
fourth value of amystology. Hence, I am obliged to embrace
any objective scientific movement in natural science as my
own value.

I believe that the world will never be a better place without

the enhancement of man into a higher being. It does not
matter what type of philosophy we formulate or constitutions
we promulgate; nothing will be better because the source of
mans unhappiness is his design! Which bears defects and
short comings; considering the fact that he has evolved from
lower animals. This is the reason why CAMIDRCS promotes
the value of masterdom; in alignment with the transhumanist
movement.

Why should man live with his defects as if they are some
type of souvenirs to be esteemed about? Why should we wait
until the sun dies out and cremate us with its dying blaze
because we think we are special and untouchable; hence,
unreformable and unimprovable creatures? Why should man
suffer and be unhappy due to his flaws? It does not make any
sense at all! Lots of funding and research must go to the
enhancement of man! Despite the cries of opposition from
the trepidated and the disoriented. That is only when the
human condition and his surroundings start to turn for the
better and reach the ultimate destination of masterdom. The

135
source of mans unhappiness is his design. By altering his
design we can make him great and we can make him happy.

26. The evolution of homo-machine._The need for

immortality_.The rise of Homo-deus

In a universe of rapid transformation we cant help but notice

the emergence of homo-machine from its provenance from
an ancient primordial soup deep in the ocean of young
protoplanetary earth. This creature has evolved to constitute
the best of organisms with his biological intelligence far
exceeding any other organism but still riddled with defects
and weaknesses.

Therefore, our interest and preoccupation should be in

purifying man from his weaknesses and defects either via
biological or technological enhancements. Consider for
instance a human being resistant to cosmic radiation; no need
for oxygen; sleep chambers and so on. Man can visit any area
within spacetime perform the exploration and investigation
first hand himself without a need for probes or rovers. If man
enhanced himself to a cyborg or a robot; space travel and
inquiry will be safer, cheaper and faster.

Our enhanced Professors and researchers without a need for

radiation protection or sleep chambers can perform
microbiological, geographical, chemical and astro-biological
investigation themselves in person rather than depending on
probes and sitting in a control room on earth waiting to
decode data.

136
The idea of merging man and machine is a matter of
necessity for the sake of human prosperity and progress. It is
already happening before our own eyes we are witnessing
people with cochlear implants, deep brain stimulation (DBS)
gears, pacemakers, bionic eyes, robotic limbs, hip implants,
knee implants and so on. The eon of homo-machine has
already begun from a small beginning then exploding to a
sapient rational being who is becoming the master of nature.

In this technologically exploding era we all should help in the

progress of natural science and understanding which will
help man to lead a comfortable life in eternal nature; science
has liberated man from arrogance and ignorance and
cultivated his reason and commonsense to embrace reality
and nature as ultimate truths.

Naturalism did indeed manumit man from the totalitarian cult

of spurious mysticism and idealism recognizing his
individuality and guaranteeing his salubrity. The eon of
homo-machine is definitely the next step of human evolution
katapulting man to the era of space age.

Reality exists independently of the observer notwithstanding

his opinions, beliefs; thoughts, moods, whims and caprice.
Observation seem to suggest that nature has gained
consciousness through human beings; man exists
representing a single natural force in a coalescence of other
natural forces competing for dominance. Inorder, for man as
a part of nature to maintain and sustain his interests within
the competition with other parts and forces of nature he has

137
to possess higher capabilities to overcome the challenges
presented by other forces of nature.

If for instance man is infirmed by a parasitic amoeba he can

only prevail over this single celled force of nature and restore
his buxom if and only if he possesses higher capabilities
either in intellect or other means. It has been said according
to intranaturalism promoted by amystology and the school of
CAMIDRCS that nature herself is self-existent, self-evident
and self-competent and nature is made up of independent and
interdependent forces competing for dominance and
influence.That there cannot be any entity outside nature ;
nature moves itself via its parts and laws according to my
objective observation.

Hence, nature must be approached from a vantage point of

forces competing for dominance rather than forces directed
by a supernatural force .We exist within nature representing
a single force of nature. Man has the capability to influence
and affect other natural forces and viceversa. Inorder, to
maintain the interest of man; man has to prevail over his
other counterpart natural forces by intellect, physicality and
so on where we observe one natural force being smashed and
eliminated by the other.The remedy is then to surpass and
eliminate mans counterparts and counteracting natural forces
which are attempting to eliminate him.

The empowerment and enhancement of man is a necessity as

stated earlier in this article. In order to make him superior
and prevalent over his competing fellow natural forces; I
believe as an amystologist that life is precious and sage man

138
even more invaluable; from billions of planets just within our
milky way, galaxy intelligent life exists exclusively as long
as our current knowledge is concerned on planet earth.
Hence, my question is why not preserve life; eternalize it and
spread it beyond this solar system? Expand the settlement of
humanity beyond the galaxy? Why not achieve natural
understanding and technological triumph? Wouldnt it be
logical and laudable at least to promote the era of space age
for the sake of our posterity and descendants rather than
promote thralldom and martyrdom to idealism and
mysticism? Indeed it will be sound to promote the systematic
understanding and taming of nature to further the interest and
aspiration of our descendants and humanity in general.

One natural force is the mover of another; one natural cause

is the creator of another; one natural cause is the annihilator
of another and so on. Each part which make up eternal nature
compete for influence and dominance; where, man as a part;
goes along in the same manner. From eliminating our
weaknesses of mortality; to enhancing our frail bodies and
memory capacity; technology is the only tool we have at our
disposal to bring about the era of masterdom. In this regard
reason and naturalism can only be the virtues that will lead
humanity to this ultimate destination.

139
27. Masterdom: The ultimate destination of amystology

Man must be the master of nature. The source of all his

suffering and the source of all his blessing is nature. Man
should not enslave himself to natural forces; but, instead
understand them inorder to tame them and determine his
destiny. Destiny can be in our hands if we have a higher
understanding of the natural world.

The source of all misfortune is our ignorance of natural

causes. Man should never cower in fear of nature and resort
to futile superstition; which, neither solve his challenges nor
enlighten his ignorant mind. The only viable option available
to him is naturalism. He can try to understand the natural
world and solve his issues through the understanding he
acquires orhe can digress to mysticism and superstition to
fool him and be a psychotic patient.

Being an infidel is a blessing! And a protection against

unverified absurdities and delusions because all natural
manifestations have evidences to substantiate their existence.
Hence, there is no need to believe because there is nothing
supernatural (i.e. something beyond our rational mind)
Mysticism orders man to surrender his dignity and sacrifice
himself as a martyr to either a god or a cult leaderso that
his entire natural challenges could be resolved.

Martyrdom is the exact opposite of what is promoted by

amystology.When we say mysticism we include all branches
which have their basis on nebeism and have an interest in
fobbing us (i.e. religions, cults, superstitions, etc.) These
groups demand blind faith and sacrifice to personified nature
140
(in the case of religionists)whether, it is your time, money
or even life.

When we analyze illusionists they also demand your belief;

these groups are the enemies of reason and their art of
deception toxic to our rational mind. I dont personally like
magic shows because it is disruptive to my rational mind.

In opposition to mysticism amystology promotes

masterdomthe transformation of enlightened and valiant
man into a master of the natural world through realistic and
objective investigation of nature which produces technology.
Whereas, in mysticism he is ordered by doctors of ignorance
to reduce himself into a minion providing sacrifices,
libations, rhapsodies, repentances and litany to ameliorate his
natural challenges and be a slave of personified nature.

Borrowing human emotions and natures like vision, hearing,

locution, thought, anger,love, hate, rage, joy, gratitude, lust,
revenge,clemency, sadism, etc. and bestowing these articles
upon nature and her forces to create a personifed character
called god will never solve all our issues and challenges
brought upon us by unpersonified natural forces.

We should remember that the term god is either abused by

mystics to impose their will on others; but, mostly it is a
euphemism for nature herself. In consideration of these facts
which approach is sensible; realistic and objective study of
nature/god to produce technology to solve our problems or
idealistic and subjective study of nature/god to produce
confusion and even more problems? A sage man will choose
the former.
141
The end game of mysticism is extinction; but, the end game
of amystology is survival and self-existence. The objective,
systematic and thorough study of our creator nature
.Understanding nature must be our purpose in life without
any mystical or spiritual tendencies and digressions: in order,
for us to reach the destination of masterdom.

So martyrdom is a dirty word in amystology because the

forces of nature are not people! Like us which demand
sacrifice-personification of nature is what ignorant minds
ended up calling god which is not going to get us anywhere
or shielding us from the onslaught of natural calamities as I
mentioned earlier. Attempting to please a raging tornado or a
severe earthquake or a devastating epidemic through
supplication, repentance, dole etc. to a personified nature is
frankly a silly, childish and futile endeavor.

The only saviour we have against natural forces is our

understanding of these forces so as to produce technology to
defend our survival and amend the human condition. So
nature is not a person which demands sacrifice to calm down
and be appeased.This fact by itself nullifies mysticism and all
its branches which are the ignorance of natural causes and
institutions of systematic derrangement.

Make commonsense your guiding principle ; naturalism your

only metaphysical preoccupation and reason your
scrutinizing tool dont fall for the mind tricks of mystics
trying to confuse and twist your innately objective mind; so
that it cant tell facts from fiction. So that you can be their
perfect subject; prostrating in awe to their pugancious

142
megalomaniac personality. Stay strictly materialistic because
thats what you are a matter.

Embrace realism, rationalism and objectivism as

epistemological tools to study your creator and amend your
condition. Choose life not death be a master not a martyr;
choose sensibility not insanity why be a slave when you can
be a master?

28. The coming of a superbeing

If we were to ask the question: where is today's rapid

technological advancement leading to? If we are witnessing
man in a gradual process perfecting his skill at managing
nature; then what does these incremental process imply?

We cannot help but notice the rapid technological evolution

taking place in our world today before our eyes. In medical
and futurstic research institutions we are witnessing the slow
merging of human biology and technology. So seemless it
might sometimes illude our observation; as seemless as the
revolution of our planet on its axis or the sprouting of a seed
in the natural world. I personally think that all this
advancement in technology is signaling the coming of
something; as well as the making of something and that
something is a self-sufficient and self-existent superbeing.

Throughout history humans have established societies and

invented superstitions because they are self-insufficient and
dependent beings who need goods and services from other

143
members of the society as well as security from the state.
Similarly, superstition serves as some sort of emotional
cajole and emotional stabilizer to compensate for the lack of
intelligence and technology; but as time goes on and
technology accelerates due to human hard work and
cognition; superstition slowly starts to fade and societies start
to collapse and vanish because man will eventually become
self-sufficient.

I presume that this phenomenon of the making of a

superbeing will probably pan out into the future decades,
centuries and even millennia before man actually becomes a
self-existent super being. Again to repeat what I have said in
the second paragraph: If it has already been established by
experiment that nature is not created and will never be
destroyed (i.e. the law of conservation of mass) what does the
evolution of our planet which gave rise to sapient primates
and their advancing technology entail? What is on the
horizon? Where does this process of technological evolution
eventually going to lead? The answer I think is: we are
witnessing the making of a god and that god is man.

In order, for us to get the point of rapid technological

evolution; let us compare the recent stage of societies at the
times of Thomas Edison and the current age of information
technology and inchoate space tourism. Compare these two
times to observe the differences in technology. The
difference is clearly evident. In my personal opinion the
biological evolution of humanity seems like it is heading no
where considering the fact that today's children are not that
much being interested in the demanding fields of STEM
144
(science, technology, engineering and mathematics) but the
technological evolution is exploding.

Some readers might think when I use statements like

'masterdom is coming' or 'the coming of a super being' etc. it
sounds mystical and may be construed as some sort of 'belief'
statement. But when I use these statements I base my
argument on pure observation that any rational man can
behold. For example, we have this movement called
Transhumanism which combats and try's to provide a cure
for ageing and death of humans which is an unthinkable
theory and movement in Edison's time because of the level of
technology at his time.

The rapid evolution of technology is the very reason that

leads to the birth of these types of great theories. We also
have another movement called Singularity like
Transhumanism which is a futuristic movement. All these
fascinating and visionary movements occur due to the
progress of technology and the number of solutions it
brought about for all humanity. Therefore, the rapid progress
of technology is without a doubt self-evident. Hence, my
claims can never be 'belief' statements. Claims like
"masterdom is coming" (i.e. total or something close to total
understanding of nature) and "the coming of a superbeing"
are not mystical at all! They are conclusions based on simple
observation which can be rescinded at any time if
observation and evidence contradicts me. But for the sake of
clarity and understanding place Edisons Kinetograph
apparatus and todays high tech video camera side by side
and make up your mind yourself.
145
If some engineer comes up with a formula and tells me that
all this technological evolution will eventually lead to
nowhere and will be halted sometime in the future due this
and that problem then I will definitely follow the evidence
and change my claims because I am an amystologist a
philosophy which is founded on ebeism.

Hence, I believe that the future is going to be awesome.The

future of transhuman civilization is going to be a very
different world from the current human civilization and
social order.When humans change their design and evolve
into some form of technological intelligence; the external
world beyond them will also change accordingly.The savage
natural order of interspecies cannibalism will give way to the
new intelligently designed natural order. When humans
slowly master the skills of manipulating nature; then I
presume the word "immpossible" might not even exist in the
lexicon of future transhuman civilizations. I think the future
is going to be a utopian cosmos or something close to it.

In a utopian Cosmos societies and superstition cannot exist

but individual super beings. Here, I do not want to be an
idealist and envision utopianism just by caprice; but what I
am saying is that if human weaknesses get reduced to a level
so miniscule then; the level of human suffering will also be
reduced to that very same level and create an almost utopian
cosmos; where, everyone will be happy and self-sufficient.

Human suffering and intelligence have an inverse

relationship. In a state of superintelligence almost all
challenges facing mankind will definitely find a resolution.

146
In a state of weak intelligence like in the case of our primate
brain almost all challenges facing mankind will not acquire a
resolution; augmenting the level of human suffering and
facilitating the invention of superstition and pseudomadness
(i.e. invention of all forms of pseudosciences). Therefore, I
can never be in contradiction with reality; if I say that rapid
technology will eventually bring about human self-
sufficiency.

Finally, to conclude this article I sincerely hope the current

advancement in natural philosophy will eventually lead into
something great; which will make people healthier, happier,
and stronger and self-sufficent bringing an end to
pseudosciences and the so called society.

147
29. Man can be a self-sufficient supreme-being

When man's understanding of nature augments exponentially

and reaches the level of masterdom man will be able to be a
real god rather than enslaving himself to the fictional gods he
created and the labrinth of meaningless theories he
concocted. Instead of cowering and lamenting as a minion
under the forces of nature he would be the master of all
natural forces.

He will be free and wanton, a self-sufficient, self-sustaining

and a self-existent super being. He won't subjugate his soul to
the church and his mind to the state. He won't be entangled
by piles of regulas restricting his existence. There will be no
distraught, diseases, and suffering. There will be no rulers
and subordinates human nature will transform from defection
to absolute perfection. He will be free of all wants and needs;
puny man will become almighty man.

The ignorance of natural causes which has contained him in a

perpetuating unhappiness will fade away and be replaced by
absolute understanding of the natural world.The complot to
keep man subjugated to the state and the church will be
broken at the stage of masterdom.The individual will prevail
as a victor; reason will triump over schizophrenia; liberalism
will triump over totalitarianism; realism will triump over
idealism; and masochism will die once and for good.

When man attains absolutism his environment shaped by his

nature will also acquire perfection.There will be no ethical
issues, no wars, no conflicts, global or multiverse challenges.
It is only here that man could actually be happy. We must be
148
sage enough not to bestow our hopes on fictional arrival
stories of long dead Middle Eastern Shepards as mesiahs to
liberated humanity from its unhappiness. It is only when man
himself reaches masterdom that he can be a happy self-
existent god.

Man has no savior except reason, and redeemer except

naturalism and coronater except the stage of masterdom. Man
must guard himself from reactionaries i.e. idealists who are
trying to drive man into extinction. Those challenged men
who are anti-immortalist, anti-masterdom and anti-salubrity.
The individual must understand his enemies these are the
state and the church plus all totalitarian pseudoscientists. He
must watch himself not to fall into their traps and fall for
their baits; most pseudo sciences nowadays, look like
genuine eusciences at first in order to trick you in to giving
them legitimacy. Once they acquire this legitimacy they will
show their true colorsa cult of totalitarian floundering.

I myself might not attain and reach the stage of masterdom

and immortality; but, as long I live whether I reach that
moment in time; where the technology has already been
acquired or not, I will advocate for it to the benefit of
mankind; and to liberate humanity from the fetters of
pseudosciences and the cult of death.

Humans are really in a precarious situation between a rock

and a hard place in this century we are seeing a refugee crises
that have never been witnessed since, the Second World War,
diseases, famines, hot and cold wars of proxys, climate
challenges, interstellar travel challenges, and so forth. This

149
problems may seem beyond us but in fact; what, is currently
beyond us is the intelgnos (natural understanding) to remedy
these issues which will eventually come about. Man has been
socialized to feel inferior and prostrate in submission before
deified and personified natural forces by the decrees of the
self-appointed ambassadors of god.

He was doctrinized since infancy that he was the creation of

a god that he is incapable of understanding not due to the
oxymoronic and chimerical nature of the character god;
which, is translated by the ambassadors not as an enigma of
incompatible attributes but as a character of supremacy; a
supremacy which is unknowable. Hence, this poor child as an
abandoned orphan was forced to hold on to this very belief
that he was inferior that nature was superior and he should
enslave himself to her forces which has been designated by
the ambassadors by various different names Tlaloc,
Chalchiuhtlicue, Anyanwu, Malakbel, Shapash, Amun,
Apollo, Ravi,Vanyu, Aoelus, Enlil, and so forth.

He was dictated to worship these gods rather than investigate

nature to amend his condition. Free thought was seen as a
vice contemplation a perversion. Hence, man suffered in
silence under the yoke of mysticism. He enslaved his volition
to the ambassadors of these gods. He even requested
permission in how to think and animate himself. In
totalitarian subjugation; man, became a minion when in fact
if he understood nature; he could have been a master and a
self-sufficient supreme being.

150
Most often ignorance begets violence and overwhelming
wrath. This has been utilized by the ambassadors as a very
effective tool in sustaining their mythological institutions. By
decreeing blasphemy and similar edicts to contain the
individual from free thought as if there can be a blasphemy
against Homer Simpson and other similar fictional characters
if we belittled their character; their institutions flourished
under tyranny and totalitarian systems. Most commonly we
witness mythical institutions as the allies of tyrants because
they can be utilized as a weapon to control the individual in
order to herd him.

Hence, the marriage between tyranny and mysticism was

established without any space for divorce; totalitarianism and
mysticism complotted against the individual to subjugate him
to their volition and vagary. The individual in confusion and
hopelessness even wished suicide to end his suffering. The
rock (the state) and the hard place (the church) that the
individual was inserted and clenched became unbearable. If
he was liberated and dignified as an intelligent being with a
potential to be a supreme master of nature herself; he would
have acquired that bliss he eagerly aspires for.

The science and technology today is much advanced than the

natural philosophy that existed in Aristotles time hence,
making it possible for us living in this current age to
contemplate natural domination and masterdom; but still the
intelgnos (i.e. natural understanding) we possess today is not
complete; hence, more investment and attention should be
given into developing technologies. I aspire a high tech
society and civilization like the movies presented to us via
151
science fiction movies like Star Trek and so forth. This is the
only route we ought to take in order to create a society full
bogged down and pre-occupied in scientific ways of life; way
afar from mystical floundering, mythology and alternative
nonsense.

A society based on science and innovations were the tools of

technology are utilized to enhance human beings to amend
their condition and their surroundings; a society free from
superstition, ignorance and totalitarianism. A society based
on reason and evidence with an aspiration to understand the
natural world; a world of grow ups who can never be
convinced with myths and fables by recalcitrant cozeners; a
society of freethinkers and skeptics who do not take any
theory at face value and for granted; where reason, realism
and objectivism become respectable words; where faith,
idealism, and subjectivism as a pre-occupation for perplexed,
callow minds and insignias of fiction; a society of
empowerment and sedulity in the investigation of reality; a
society of individualism, naturalism and transhumanism.This
is the kind of society I aspire and want to dwell in as well as
prepare for my descendants.

It is only here, in this kind of society that man can really

attain the stage of self-sufficiency and supremacy. It is only
when he is liberated, dignified and encouraged to inquire into
the nature of reality than be suffocated by the evil triangle of
totalitarianism i.e. between the state, the society and the
church that he can acquire his maximum potential.

152
Free thought, pure reason and naturalism are the facilitators
to the ultimate destination of masterdom and supremacy. As
has been said in other articles it is the ignorance of reality
which is the radix of our unhappiness; hence, the
understanding of reality will provide the reverse. In order for
this to manifest the individual must be left alone and be
under protg to reach self-sufficiency and self-existence.

30. Intelligent design: The need for rectifying and

purging human nature from ill designs

Human nature shapes the world in its own image. All that we
observe on the ground are manifestations due to the natural
design possessed by man; violence, love, sex, hate, war,
conflict, humanitarianism, selfishness, mysticism, rationalism
and just about all manifestations on the ground are due to the
human design. Therefore, inorder to solve all of man's
complaints and challenges we must rectify human nature
first.

The issue that man is untouchable; or it is immoral to

tamper with human design is a misguided and erroneous
position. Man organically is no different from a vegetable.
All his behaviours emanate from his nature. He is not remote
controlled by some fictional god that he created himself; but
situ-controlled by his own nature on the ground. Therefore, it
will be sensible to fix what has been abhorably designed by
nature into an intelligent design in the laboratory.
153
Man's weak intelligence, his puganicity ,salacity, vulgarity,
irrationality and other weaknesses must be eradicated and
replaced by something better ( i.e either via biological or
technological enhancements) Notwithstanding our cognition
that all worldly manifestations are natural and occur due to
man's nature and other natural forces; we seem to be
reluctant to act upon editing the source of it all.This
hesitiation and fear may be due to one of the most powerful
reactionary pseudocscience called theism and its influence in
politics and the society.

Theism has integrated itself in every aspect of social life

from antiquity till present time involving itself from the time
man is born (baptism) until his demise (funeral). Hence, it
possesses a maximum influence and strangle hold on social
life; but fortunately this pseudoscience is slowly dieing due
to the advancement of naturalism and the human intellect;
hence, social policies seem to shift more liberally where
decisions are starting to be made individually based on
reason and commonsense.

The issue of rectifying man is not a matter of luxury but a

need! First and foremost people must possess a rectified
metaphysical philosophy.They must understand that nature is
the real god. It has not been created or will never be
destroyed. Once they understand that they are not the work of
a force outside nature but nature herself; once they ditch
supernaturalism for intranaturalism; then, it will be easier to
show to these people that their nature itself is responsible for
all their blessings and all their misery. Hence, the logical

154
solution must be intelligent design in order to live in a
utopian universe.

We must be engaged in rectifing and enhancing mankind to

alleviate his sufferings and maximize his bliss. The practical
experiments must be started at all major Biotech hubs and
Universities funded with sufficient capital; backed up by
politicians and policy makers inorder to bring about
maximum results. Ignoring intelligent design to prolong the
agony of man is not a sensible attitude. We will be just
waiting to be cremated by the sun when it runs out of fuel
despite having the option of being universal
supercreatures.What types of idiots want to do that? We
need to enhance ourselves and be universal beings with
universal wisdom.

Therefore, let us embrace intranaturalism and smash down

the so called 'super' naturalism theory of iron age shepards.
Once, we clear the smashed rubbles of the inane theory of
'super' naturalism; the taboo of tampering with nature will
vanish from our consciousness and state laws; then, we can
confidently start establishing the foundations of
intranaturalism. Once intranaturalism has been erected we
can start manipulating our own nature and the environment
beyond us to create a comfortable universe for us and our
posterity.We are a modern society with numerous Gigabits of
modern cosmological data and information. Hence, we
should know better and be sapient enough not to be slaves of
fictional and speculative litreature.

155
Intelligent design is not something strange; a dam for
example can be considered as intelligent design in order to
redirect and utilize a rogue natural force i.e. river to the
benefit of man; a lightning rod for example can be considered
as intelligent design inorder to save ourselves and our assets
from the shambolic forces of nature; a medicine to cure
ourselves from ailments can also be seen as intelligent design
because a penicillin is just a fungus while in nature; but,
when applied to thwart deadly bacterial growth in the human
organism; then, it will be a design of human ingenuity.

When I say that intelligent design is the only solution for

human challenges, I mean the manipulation of nature
according to our desire; but, that does not mean anarchy and
nihilism to create zombie human beings and what not. The
bottom line here is the betterment of humanity and
alleviation of human suffering either from a disease or other
challenges. The current status quo of global order must be
reformed or overthrown; if, it is not willing or unable to
accommodate human engineering and enhancements.

Finally, some people consider nature itself as an intelligent

designer for creating man; but considering the situation of
our world, we see nothing intelligent on the ground; we
observe a shambolic force in action; we observe tumult and
suffering on pretty much every corner of the globe. About 4
billion years of evolution and what blind nature has to show
for, is a belligerent superstitious ape as her masterpiece; now
is that intelligent design? I don't think so.

156
It is imperative that we correct what nature has messed up
and enhance ourselves to be a better and happier
superbeings.The overall message is that we are the work of
nature! There is nothing beyond nature! Nature is absolute!
god is a metaphor for nature herself! Having a hard time
believing these statements well observe your own nature
shaping your day to day experiences in life and may be you
will understand. Intelligent design must commence now;
human engineering must be a norm!

31. Self-existence: The end of the Darwinian natural

order and the incipience of utopia

The limitations of the human intelligence has created a

dystopic and miserable world of competing states, racist
societies and nationalistic populus exterminating one tribe
after the other as witnessed throughout history.The genocide
of the Canaanite people by the Jews; the genocide of
Armenians by the Turks; the genocide of the Jews by Nazi
germany; the nihilistic rampage of empirial Japan in the 20th
century on China and the rest of Asia.The formation and
deformation of states like Babylon, the kindgom of Israel and
Yugoslavia and so on indicate to us that we are living in a
Darwinian natural order of competition for survival,
brutalism,selfishness,and savagery.

Do you want to continue living in this type of natural order?

Do you want a different natural order to set in nature? Now
in amystology we believe that self-existence is the ultimate
solution to the world. Which means that expanding man's
157
primiate intelligence and eventually making him possessors
of infinite intelligence so that, he can make amends to his
misformed nature to be something great. Capitalism,
socialism, communism and any other theory will never create
a utopia.

In the Darwinian world where a cat is not designed to be

amicable with a rat or a bourgeois is not designed to be
clement toward a proletariate; I wonder whether this savage
world could ever be changed. The answer I came up with
after long hours of contemplation and cogitation was an
absolute yes! The current natural order of Darwinianism can
absolutely change; if it is possible and if we can figure out
the formulas to change human nature. To change this creature
called man who is a hybrid of intelligence and beastiality into
a sheer form of infinite or something close to infinite
intelligence without any animalistic and belligerent
features.The Darwinian natural order set in place by nature
can be changed and is not a dogma written on stone. It is a
natural process and any natural process must have a
solution.Technology is able to alter this design to make it
benign and may be a utopian natural order.

As an example, if humans are genetically or biologically

engineered not to have a need for pabulum and acquire their
energy need in different form i.e may be through hydrogen
fuel or solar energy or nuclear energy of some sort then, there
will not be a single farm or abbattoir on the planet or any
agitated animal rights protests, famine or from industrial
point of view restaurants, chefs, waitresses, food scientists, or
a single bathroom for that matter. If humans were made
158
rather than born then, there will not be a gynecology ward on
any hospital on the planet, a gynecologist, birth control pills
industry, infant mortality,labour,sex, pornography industry,
porn stars, sex crimes, condom factories,venerologists and
venerology etc. If humans had a higher rational intelligence
then, there will not be a single mystical and superstitious
institution on the planet all churches, mosques, voodoo and
palmistry shacks will be wiped out; they will not serve any
purpose anymore because man has become through
augmentation a super intelligence who has no need for
supplicating any higher being other than himself. What I am
trying to elucidate here is, what consequences will come
about on the ground if we alter human nature for the better.

The Darwinin natural order if altered this way will entail a

very different natural order; as I elaborated above.The
dystopic world that we lament and complain about is
corrigible by appropriate technology to give us a utopia. Man
can be made into a superintelligence rather than a primate
intelligence; hence, allowing him to manipulate nature as he
sees fit with an agenda of creating a utopia. This will end the
competition of individuals to preserve themselves for
survival and the competition of states in general, as states are
nothing but a coalescence of human beings. It will be the end
of states and society. It will be the begining of self-sufficency
and self-existence. Therefore, the ideology which can make
our world a utopia is not socialism, capitalism or communism
but transhumanism. The only potent tool which can create a
mirthful world is technology.

159
Technology can end ageing forexample; now imagine the
consequence of that? for a second or two....if there is no
ageing then gerontology and gerontologists will not exist; age
related maladies will not manifest any more; there will not be
a single retirement home anywhere on the planet; technology
can turn your squishy self into a ghost like holographic
existence and you may be able to go through walls;
technology can edit the abhorably designed replusive human
nature into something better. Imagine transhumans without
the emotion of anger and savagery? Imagine self-sustaining
transhumans by gathering dissipated energy from the
environment? There will be no hunger or starvation.Imagine
transhumans 10051 years old but who look 25 years old?
Imagine transhumans without a need for the earth's
biosphere? Imagine radiation resistant interplanetary
cyborgs? Imagine transhumans who can process 1,000,000
books persecond and memorize it all? Imagine purely
rational transhumans with commonsense who do not need to
sacrifice themselves or anyone to toys of superstition and
fetishism; the world would have been free from terrorism
which is inspired by apocalyptic madness? Imagine
technology solving interstellar and time travel? Imagine all
these possibilities.

Now coming to the nitty-gritty of it all which is developing

the actual formulas for all these dreams that we have
concieved by our techno-philosophy; we cannot help but feel
the weight on our shoulders of research and development but
the reward which comes out of R&D is ineffably satisfying.
Philosophy can only direct us to the solution; it cannot
provide us the solution. Only R&D can do the providing part.
160
Therefore, as a reminder first and foremost we must posses a
rectified metaphysical point of view as discussed above. This
is where philosophy comes in; hence, we choose naturalism,
singularitarianism, transhumanism or amystology as our
philosophy or any other philosophy which supports radical
science. Next, we need to figure out the formulas for making
these philosophies a reality.We need to figure out precisely
which genes bring about ageing; we need to figure out the
temperature problems to make super intelligent machines a
reality; we need to figure out the technology to save our
universe form heat death; we need to figure out the formula
how to turn squishy man into a holographic intelligence;
who, can walk through a wall taking the most adaptable state
of existence inorder to be a self-existent being.

Philosophy is one thing; but, technology is

another.Therefore, first philosophy may be super important
inorder, to possess the right orientation about reality and the
cosmos; but we still need to work on developing the formulas
and blue prints to make our dream of self-existence a
reality.We need to get busy as much as we can tryng to bring
an end to the savage and miserable world of Darwinianism
via research and development of a superintelligence machine
to merge with the human organism; because, frankly I am
afraid that all of the above goals mentioned; hitherto, may
not be handled by human intelligence alone. Hence, our goal
of amelioration, and eventually immortality are a very tall
order to be handled by man, but I am an optimist that self-
enhancement and ultimately self-existence technologies will
be developed by researchers throughout the higher
institutions all over the world slowly and step by step. For
161
this, we need to follow the latest research articles and
publications from research publishers.

Finally, coming to the criticism of short sighted techno-

pessimists who think that amelioration and eventually the
self-existence of humans is a desipient endeavor; by stating
that, how can this fragile creature made out of flesh and
bones and a limited intelligence who cannot even predict
coming events in his current condition and daily experiences
going to manage and determine the future, to be a self-
existent supercreature? and other similar questions might be
raised; but, these people seem to be nescient about the
concept of progressive technology; the criticism that the
singularity, transhumanism and me myself for amystology
are receiving for promoting radical technologies; is the
similar negative criticism that the Wright brothers received
while they experimented with their wooden and fragile
aircraft; which, was almost as tiny like a Kite. Their critics
had no idea that humans will be flying across oceans taking
showers and receiving outstanding opulent catering on midair
on epic Boeings and Airbus carriers several decades later.
Therefore, to be a critic of progressive science and
technology will probably make you a laughing stock of later
generations who will benefit from the dreams and insights of
scientists of antiquity. Therefore, I have a dream that one day
man will be a superintelligent and self-existent being in
nature bringing an end to the Darwinian natural world of
beastiality.

162
Glossary: Terms and definitions in amystology

Ammactivity: is a terminology which defines the

incapability of something immaterial to interact with
something material due to their incompatible nature. Thus,
can never be responsible for its animation or creation.

Banemania: A state of self-destruction in a state of irrational

whimism, irritability, violence and vagary.

The Bin-laden effect: A state of corruption due to an illusion

of reality induced by impostors via emotional and
psychological cajoles.

The bogswa state: The state of helplessness and wondering

in a swamp of perplexion as is seen in the behaviors of the
followers of Pseudo-cults.

Delusion: The state of perceiving non-existent entities due to

organic or other causes of mental illness. (A professional and
detailed explanation may be acquired from The DSM-book
series: Diagnostical and statistical manual of mental
disorders.)

The god delusion: a form of delusional disorder in which

patients experience exhotatory messages from a character
called godwhich are thought of as revelations which in
fact they are really symptoms of a severe biological disorder
of the brain; which leads to the manifestation of both
positive as well as negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Derelectism: The state of abandoning the individual to be as

he chooses without any psychological, emotional, physical,
economical, and social pressure, constraints and
totalitarianism. This is a state where the individual is
dignified and is free from fear.

The divergent fallacy: An error in thought where due to the

short comings in understanding reality, attributes are paid to
causes which are even more obscure.

Example: Because we cannot account what the consciousness

is yet, we label consciousness with even more obscure terms
calling it a spirit and so on instead of diving deeper into
nature to figure out what it is and how it came about.

Dualistic mysticism: In this level of mysticism the

individual seems to be entangled between orthodox
materialism and heretic mysticism. He can be a Idolatric
mystic who thinks that either nature can be personified to
have a dialogue with ; or, a spiritual mystic who believes
that; it is a useless heap of dead matter without an essence
moved by what he calls a spirit that he created We must
understand and signify the irrational position of a dualist. He
is an individual who states on one hand that nature is self-
existent; moving herself by laws embracing realism and on
the other he states that it is a heap of dead matter without an
essence moved by a spirit which he cannot explain without
a contradiction and provide a palpable attestment for.

Ebeism: evidence based existence.

Eusciences: true sciences with demonstration and efficacy.

The fallacy of misplaced attribution: This is an act of

attributing responsibilities for irresponsible causers.
Example: God created the universe; diseases are punishment
from the gods; mental illnesses are caused by spirits, demons,
jinn etc.

The fallacy of glookism: This term denotes an action of

avoidance of cogent and vivid evidence presented forth due
to a bias in psychological, emotional, economic or other
interests. The individual avoids the clear evidence in vagary
rather than discredit it with equivalent evidence to its
contrary.

Heretic mysticism: A state of divergence from the true

nature of reality towards spiritual nonsense.

Idolatry mysticism: The mystification of natural objects like

trees, sun, oceans, thunder, statues, animals, etc. These
people are called polytheists who have personified and
mystified natural components; in an attempt to open a
channel of dialogue and amend their condition. These people
can at least see what they have ended up called gods
physically so they are not in a worse condition than spiritual
mystics even though they are as misdirected as spiritualists
who have abandoned nature altogether for spiritualism.

The inherency principle: This is the most important

principle in amystology which states that nature/matter exists
and moves itself due to its own inherent essence. There
cannot be an entity without an essence and there cannot be an
essence without and entity. For example, a pen has an
essence called writing. A pen without writing is meaningless!
And can never exist because it is writing which makes an
entity called Pen to exist. The essences of entities determine
what they are? What they do? And what they will be? Hence,
simply stated the inherency principle is stated as: existence
begets essence and essence determines existence.

Intelagnos: Natural ignorance.

Intelgnos: Natural understanding.

The minus principle: This principle states that people are

more credulous to nonsense when they are less empowered
and highly skeptical when they are more empowered. We
must put under consideration that education and
empowerment are two different things. People may be skilled
in certain areas but are ignorant in other areas these people
are not empowered but educated. It is only when an
individual possesses several skills in several areas that we
call him an empowered man.

Martyrdom: An act of nihilistic self-sacrifice to a fictional

deity or cult leader.

Masterdom: total understanding of the natural world;

pansophy or omnipotence.

Material fetishism: An irrational affinity for superstitious

material objects like the cross, Kabba or other similar
physical statues.

The misplaced expectation: This is the attitude of

pseudoscientists where unreal expectations are begotten from
an already unreal system.

The nature of reality: The state of truth which we can infer

from observing the natural world.

Natural absolutism: This is the most important concept and

foundation in amystology which states that nature is
complete or in other worlds nature is absolute. There is
nothing beyond nature; nature is the sole metaphysical truth
and we need pure reason in order to engage it.

Natural mysticism: In this scenario the individual has

embraced natural absolutism rejecting anything
supernatural as a form of delusion and disorder but his
method of engagement with nature is mystical. This makes
him right in metaphysics but terrible wrong in epistemology.
Natural mysticism is benign in consideration with
supernatural mysticism where in super natural mysticism the
individual is totally psychotic due to his rejection of the only
dimension in existence which is nature. But, in natural
mysticism at least he has embraced natural absolutism thus
the only thing left for him to do is to be rational in his
engagement with nature. Thus, natural mysticism can be
tolerated even if someone becomes grateful, adulatory, calls
nature by name as a god and even worships it and establishes
a mystical relationship with nature; but, he should never be
encouraged to go down that route because all observation
suggests that only rational relationship with nature bears
fruit in augmenting the quality of life. It must also be
remebererd that natural mysiticsm has only emotional relief
than practical solutions on the ground; that is the reason why
we need to be rational in order to provide practical solutions
to our challenges.

Example: examples of natural mysticism include paganism,

pantheism, Leninism Marxism, astrology, scientology,
biocentrism, the law of attractionism etc.

Nebeism: non-evidence based existence.

The orthoher graph: The name orthoher comes from two
words orthodoxy and heresy. This graph was developed to
show the orthodoxy and heresy of human behavior from the
nature of reality; while, he is in action. It analyzes whether he
is practicing eusciences or pseudosciences and whether his
life is progressing towards masterdom or martyrdom.

Orthodox materialism: A state of pure reason and

naturalism without any duality.

Pseudosciences: fallacious school of thoughts and doctrines.

Pseudoscientists: Individuals who are experts on inane and

non-evident systems.

Pseudo-victim: An individual who is the victim of a

pseudoscience.

Pseudo-vituperation: This is an attempt to denigrate and

spurn the natural world because it is challenging, and
intricate; to divert into systematic floundering and
derangement towards a pseudoscience.

The red-outburst: A prejudiced and overwhelming agitation

and wrath in defense of a pseudoscience.

Salubrism: This is the ethical principle of amystology which

states that the individual should maintain his salubrity in
three spectrums as much as he can namely psychologically,
emotionally, and physically; in opposition to mystical
teachings of self-mortification.

The Sezlers phenomenon: This is a designation which states

that people are more often enthusiastic votaries/exponents of
something they think they know but never understand.
Spiritual mysticism: The denigration and abandonment of
nature for a spirit which is considered by the believer as the
influencer of nature. In this attitude and state the mystics
assign a spirit outside of nature and try to influence it by
invoking this entity that they created. This stage of mysticism
is extremely dangerous and the worst form of mysticism
because these mystics are not in touch with reality. They
have not only rejected the materialistic nature of nature but
have detached themselves from what they are i.e. material
beings in order to influence and understand the natural world.
Hence, they are more likely to suffer from delusional and
psychotic disorders.

The state of compulsivity: An irresistible pulse to subjugate

mankind by totalitarianism to a particular pseudoscience or
volition.

Supernatural mysticism: is a form of mysticism where the

individual is both erroneous in his metaphysics as well as his
epistemology. He thinks there is an immaterial world and
abandons nature for a dimension that he is incapable of
understanding. Thus, makes a big error in metaphysics as
well as epistemology.

Example: examples of supernatural mysticism include all

systems and doctrines based on immaterialism which
basically psychosis like Christianity, Islam, and so forth.