Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction..1
Review of Literature3
Problem Statement...6
Experimental Design....7
Conclusion.28
Acknowledgements....32
Works Cited...38
Introduction
Goudie-McCloskey 1
Every time we use our smartphone or computer monitor, we damage our body more and
more. With technology evolving as much as it has, much of what is done everyday involves a
screen or some form of artificially produced light. Sources of blue light include the sun, digital
screens (TVs, computers, laptops, smart phones, and tablets), electronic devices, and fluorescent
and LED lighting(Blue Light Exposed). These light sources can produce ultraviolet (UV) rays.
Some of the lower visible light spectrum, the blue to violet range (350 nm to 390 nm), still emits
ultraviolet rays. This range of visible light is scientifically referred to as Blue Light or
ultraviolet A rays. When blue light travels through the atmosphere, it scatters off of air molecules,
and makes the sky look blue(Blue Light Exposed). Ultraviolet B rays (380 nm to 500 nm,
Ultraviolet radiation can be very harmful to ones eyes and skin since it is a type of
radiation. Research shows that it may contribute to the causation of cancer, diabetes,
heart disease, and obesity(Blue light has). In the eye, it can cause increased deterioration of
the retina or even macular degeneration, which can cause blindness with age. It can also mess
with melatonin levels, causing one to have more restless sleep or even insomnia. Ultraviolet rays
can also cause problems with ones skin such as redness, irritation, or even cancer. The primary
source of UV radiation comes from the sun, but years of being exposed to UV radiation emitted
This research had two goals. The first was to find which emitted the most ultraviolet rays
and blue light: phones, computer monitors, or LED lights. The stronger the light intensity read by
the UV sensors, the more ultraviolet radiation is given off by the device. The research was
entirely conducted within a dark room in order to prevent any light not coming from the light
sources from being recorded. A website that strobed colors for all the phones and computer
monitors was used. Every device was recorded 10 times using both sensors. Ultraviolet A and
Goudie-McCloskey 2
ultraviolet B were both measured to measure blue light emitted as well as any invisible ultraviolet
radiation given off. An ANOVA test was then used to compare each light source to one another.
The second goal was to find which prevented the most ultraviolet A, a yellow filter or a
polarizer filter. Whichever filter blocks the most light intensity is the one that better protects. The
yellow filter, when filtering blue light, produces a white light that has little to no ultraviolet
radiation. The polarizer filter allows only perpendicular light rays to pass through it, blocking any
rays that are not coming from directly above the sensor. The sun was used as a light source for the
filters because it would show a larger difference to compare between filters. The ultraviolet A and
ultraviolet B light intensity of the sun were measured ten times with no filter as a control for our
research. Then for each filter, the light intensity of the sun without the filter was first recorded,
then the light intensity with the filter was recorded. The light intensity found with the filter was
then subtracted from the light intensity when the filter was not used, giving us the difference in
light intensities. These differences were then compared using a t test. The combination of an
ANOVA test and a t test will reveal if any device is more dangerous than another and what filter
This research has many real life applications and branches into other researches. From
where you should watch television or read books, to whether or not staying up late on the
computer is what's causing someone to go blind. Some forms of depression, can be helped with
a careful amount of UV light can help. Electronics can be re-engineered to be safer than ever
before. With proper protection and knowledge, the likelihood of getting cataracts and cancer
would decrease. This research can help make important technology safer and be applied to an
array of researches.
Review of Literature
Goudie-McCloskey 3
This experiment determined which common light source produces the most
ultraviolet rays (UV) and which filter greatest reduces the effects of the rays. The
common light sources that were tested were an LED, a computer monitor, and a phone
because they are common and unintentionally produce UV rays. Ultraviolet rays, over
time, have numerous negative symptoms on the human body. This experiment also
uses filters to find what blocks the UV light the most from these light sources. The filters
that were tested were a polarizing filter, a yellow filter, and no filter. Polarizing and
yellow filters are commonly found in sun glasses to reduce the UV rays, and the no filter
acts as a control.
research. The electromagnetic spectrum is the range of light energy, from radio waves
to gamma rays. Light has a dual nature because although it is a particle, it is measured
by its wavelength, the distance between peaks. The wavelength determines what type
of light it is on the electromagnetic spectrum. The visible light of the spectrum can have
a wavelength from 350 nanometers (nm) to 750 nm as seen in figure 1, with the upper
UV portion, ultraviolet A, overlapping at 340 nm to 390 nm. This means that some
visible light can have UV radiation. The UVA sensor used measures from 320 nm to 390
nm, and the UVB sensor measures from 290 nm to 320 nm. Our atmosphere generally
protects us from UV radiation below 280 nm (Good). The range of the UVA and UVB
sensor combined ensures that any form of ultraviolet radiation given off by the light
wavelength with the least energy (radio waves) to the smallest wavelength with the
most energy (cosmic rays). In this experiment, the visible light portion along with the the
material that affects a lights color or intensity. This experiment used two filters, a yellow
one and a polarizing one. The yellow filter was used to cancel out the blue light in the
UV portion of the visible light. A yellow filter was used because blue and yellow are
complimentary colored lights (UV-visible), as lights they combine to make white light.
This is due to the properties of lights and waves; while light can be split into three
simple colors: red, green, and blue. When all three are combined, a white light is
formed, but when red and green light is combined, a yellow light is formed. This yellow
light is what is being added with the yellow filter because when the light passes through
Goudie-McCloskey 5
it, the blue lights are absorbed, and when combined with the ultraviolet blue light,
makes a non ultraviolet white light. The polarizing filter is used to simulate sunglasses
with polarizing filters in them. The polarizing filters in the sunglasses block some of the
UV rays, but more importantly they reduce glare and non direct light. All monitors and
screens have 2 polarizing strips built in, in order to prevent backlight and glare.
Therefore the polarizing filter was the same angle as the filters in the screen and
allowed a lot of light through, but increase the amount of glare and backlight blocked.
Finally, the control was no filter, which simulated looking at these common light sources
A similar study was the research on the effect of ultraviolet light on the circadian
Ordinarily, the pineal gland...begins to release melatonin a couple of hours before your
regular bedtime [however], light - particularly of the blue variety - can keep the pineal
gland from releasing melatonin, thus warding off sleepiness(Meerl). Their research, like
this one, studied ultraviolet radiation. The research in this study sought to find which
type of device emitted the most ultraviolet radiation while the research by the Sleep
patterns.
radiation. The stronger the light intensity read by the sensors, the more UV rays are
being emitted. This radiation can be dampened by having the light travel through a filter.
Ultraviolet light has numerous negative side effects on the human body. This research
measures how much ultraviolet light is given off by common light sources and which
Problem Statement
Problem:
To determine which source gives off the most amount of ultraviolet light and
Hypothesis:
The computer screen with no filter will produce the highest amount of ultraviolet
radiation, and the polarizer filter will block the most of the ultraviolet light from the sun.
Data Measured:
The independent variables for this research were the light sources (computer
monitor, phone, and LED light) and the filters (yellow and polarizer). The dependent
variable was the intensity of the ultraviolet rays being produced. An analysis of variance
(ANOVA) was used to compare each of the three light sources populations, and a t-test
was used to compare the amount of ultraviolet light blocked by the two filters
populations. Ten trial of each light source were compared and then ten trials of both
Experimental Design
Materials:
Goudie-McCloskey 7
Procedure:
2. Find a place with minimum interfering lighting to set up in, a dark room would be best.
3. Plug the Vernier UVA and UVB sensors into the labquest.
7. Line up the middle of the light source ten centimeters away from the sensors, and
make the light source perpendicular to the table.
8. Adjust the height of the clamps so the sensors are pointed at the center of the light
source.
10. For the phone and monitor, set it to strobe through a multitude of colors.
Ducksarethebest.com was used for this experiment.
13. Change light source and repeat steps six through eleven.
14. Place both sensors in a clamp and point them directly up at the sky.
15. Stand back and record the mean of the data from the Labquest.
Goudie-McCloskey 8
17. Place the filter over the sensors making sure that nothing but the filter is on the
sensor.
18. Record the mean of the data from the Labquest again.
20. Remove the filter and repeat steps 15 through 19 with the next filter.
Diagrams:
Figure 2 displays the setup of the experiment to measure the amount of milliwatts
per meter2 of the desktop computer monitor. The milliwatts per meter2 is measured by
the sensors that are set 10 cm away from the light source.
Goudie-McCloskey 9
Figure 3. Materials
Figure 3 shows the materials used in this experiment. The TI-nspire is not
pictured, along with the level, the Iphone 5s, the Samsung Galaxy Note 4, the extension
Figure 4 shows the data recorded from a trial in the experiment. The mean is
acquired by going into the analysis tab and pressing Statistics. The mean for this trial is
seen to be 1.42 milliwatts per meter2, and the units can be seen in the lower left hand
corner.
Table 1
LED
Trial Number LED type Light Intensity (milliwatts per
meter2)
Table 1 shows the mean of the light intensity over a 20 second period from the
Table 2
Computer monitor
Trial Number Monitor type Light Intensity (milliwatts
per meter2)
1 Monitor -0.2800
4 Laptop 0.08640
5 Laptop -0.2490
6 Monitor -0.1089
8 Laptop -0.2957
Goudie-McCloskey 12
13 Laptop -0.1556
15 Monitor -0.4980
16 Monitor 0.6070
17 Monitor -0.3012
20 Monitor -0.4537
Table 2 shows the mean of the light intensity over a 20 second period from the
Table 3
Phone
Trial Number Phone type Light Intensity (milliwatts
per meter2)
3 Iphone 5s -1.987
18 Iphone 5s -1.990
21 Iphone 5s -1.98
24 Iphone 5s -1.993
26 Iphone 5s -1.961
Table 3 shows the mean of the light intensity over a 20 second period from the
Table 4
No filter
Trial Light Intensity (UVA) Light Intensity (UVB)
Goudie-McCloskey 13
2 3530 252.8
5 4612 346.1
6 5059 368.9
11 4976 367.9
16 4668 337.0
17 3654 274.2
20 2931 219.7
27 3355 251.8
28 3633 273.3
30 2855 214.8
Table 4 shows the mean light intensity over a 20 second period recorded from the
Table 5
Yellow filter
Trial Light Intensity Difference Light Intensity Difference
(UVA) (milliwatts per meter2) (UVB) (milliwatts per meter2)
1 3502 278
3 3720 290.5
8 2395 190.9
10 2710 222.7
13 2950 232.1
14 2503 201.7
19 2361 192.2
Goudie-McCloskey 14
22 2482 199.7
26 2801 228.1
29 2604 215.3
Table 5 shows the difference in mean light intensities over a 20 second period
recorded from the sun when the yellow filter covered the sensors.
Table 6
Polarizer filter
Trial Light Intensity Difference Light Intensity Difference
(UVA) (milliwatts per meter2) (UVB) (milliwatts per meter2)
4 4427 344.5
7 5868 437.2
9 3943 301.0
12 3104 237.4
15 3135 242.2
18 3510 273.5
21 4258 330.4
23 4220 337.9
24 5124 402.5
25 5451 417.7
Table 6 shows the difference in mean light intensities over a 20 second period
recorded from the sun when the polarizer filter covered the sensors.
Table 7
Average Light Intensity of Light sources
Light Source Phone Monitor Led Light
Light Intensity(milliwatts per
meter2) -1.711 -0.1649 -2.388
Goudie-McCloskey 15
Table 7 shows the average light intensity, in milliwatts per meter2, for each of the
light sources. For average intensity, phones emitted -1.711 milliwatts per meter2,
computer monitors emitted -0.1649 milliwatts per meter2, and LED lights emitted -2.388
Table 8
Average Difference in Light Intensity Due to Filter
Averages
(g) No filter Yellow Filter Polarizer Filter
Light Intensity UVA
(milliwatts per meter2) 3927 2803 4304
Light Intensity UVB
(milliwatts per meter2) 290.7 225.1 332.4
Table 8 shows the average light intensity, in milliWatts per meter2, for each of the
filters. For average intensity, no filter results in a difference 3927 milliwatts per meter2 of
ultraviolet A and 290.7 milliwatts per meter2 of ultraviolet B, yellow filter results in a
difference of 2803 milliwatts per meter2 ultraviolet A and 225.1 milliwatts per meter2 of
ultraviolet B, and polarizer filter results in a difference of 4304 milliwatts per meter2 of
Observations:
Table 9
Observations
Trial Light/Filter Observations
Table 9 shows any notable observations recorded while during our trials.
Figure 4 shows a trial in which the light intensity of a common light source, the
computer monitor, was measured. For both the monitors and the phones
sensors are set ten centimeters away from the screen. When recording, the lights are
turned off and any light shining under the doors are blocked. The Labquest is also
covered so the sensors do not read any ambient light given off by it.
Figure 5 shows a trial where the effect of the filter, such as the polarizer filter, is
measured. First the light intensity is measured without the filter, then with the filter held
over the sensors. The light intensity when the filter is applied is then subtracted from the
light intensity when the filter is not applied. These differences are then recorded on the
laptop.
Goudie-McCloskey 18
Many steps were taken to ensure accurate recordings of the ultraviolet intensity
from LEDs, monitors, phones, as well as sunlight with no filter, yellow filter, or polarizer
filter in this experiment. The first step taken was repetition of trials to ensure consistency.
Sixty trials were run; thirty of the trials tested different light sources and the other thirty
trials tested different filters. Of the thirty trials dealing with light sources, ten used
cellphones, ten used computer monitors, and ten used LED lights. Of the thirty trials
dealing with filters, ten used no filter, ten used yellow filter, and ten used polarizer filter.
Repetition of trials is important because it helps to determine if there are any outliers or
significant changes in data. The next step was to randomize the trials. The order of the
trials was determined by generating random integers (see Appendix A). The order of the
trials determined which light source or which filter to use. Randomization of trials
reduces bias which lowers the chance of getting data that is skewed in one direction.
Lastly, all of the trials were performed in the same manner under the same conditions
ensuring all of the trials were exposed to the same testing environment to reduce the
The purpose of this experiment was to determine which commonly found light
source of cell phones, computer monitors, and LEDs produced the most UV rays, and
which filter of no filter, yellow filter, and polarizer filter blocked the most UV rays. The
statistical test used for this experiment was an ANOVA test along with multiple two-
sample t-tests. The ANOVA test was the best for this experiment because it compares
Goudie-McCloskey 19
multiple means from three different types of populations, and the two-sample t-tests were
used to compare means from the data that showed some overlap in the ANOVA test.
Figure 6 compares the box plots of the testing of the different light sources. The
means for the phone and the LED are close, but there is no overlap and the data for the
monitor shows a much higher intensity than the others. This means that the monitor emits
a significantly higher UVB intensity. The data for the LED also is very left skewed which
means that much of the data lies to the right of the mean, but there is an equal amount of
data on each side of the median. There is also an outlier for the data from the phone that
Figure 7 compares the box plots of the difference in the Ultraviolet A with the
testing of the different filters. About 25 percent of the data from the polarizer filter
overlays a little less than 25 percent of the data from the yellow filter, but the yellow
filter has an outlier which may have caused some skewing. As for the means of the filters,
they are relatively far apart. The outlier skewed the mean of the yellow filter causing it to
be closer to the mean of the polarizer filter. This implies that the polarizer filter emits a
significantly higher UVA intensity than the yellow filter. Other than that outlier, the
yellow filter looks to be very slightly right skewed, and the polarizer filter, though it has a
Figure 8 compares the box plots of the difference in the ultraviolet B with the
different filters. Much like figure 7, figure 8 shows some overlap but there is more of an
overlap of the filters with UVB than the 25 percent of UVA as seen in figure 7. As for the
means of the filters, they are relatively far apart. The outlier skewed the mean of the
yellow filter causing it to be closer to the mean of the polarizer filter. This implies that the
polarizer filter emits a significantly higher UVA intensity than the yellow filter. There is
also an an outlier which may cause the data to be more right skewed than it appears in
this figure. The data from the polarizer filter appears to be normal.
Goudie-McCloskey 22
Figure 9 shows the results for the ANOVA test (Appendix B) that was run on the
data. An ANOVA test compares the means of all populations, in this case the different
phones, monitors, and LEDs, in order to determine if they all equal each other. Having an
extremely low PVal indicates that the alternative hypothesis, listed below, is true when
compared to the alpha level of 0.0.5. The alpha level is a measure of significance that the
Table 10
Sample Standard Deviations
Light source Phone Monitor LED
xi -1.711 -0.1821 -2.388
si 0.2877 0.3078 0.4031
n 10 10 10
Table 10 shows the sample means and standard deviations of the three different
variables. These were used in the assumptions to help determine if the ANOVA test
Assumptions:
There are 10 simple random samples for each of the three different
populations
The data appears to come from a normal population based on the box plots
(Figure 6)
The lowest sample standard deviation (0.2877) is not less than half of the
largest sample standard deviation (0.4031), so continue with caution
Reject Ho, that states that each of the light sources produced the same intensity of
ultraviolet rays, because the alpha level of 0.05 is greater than the p-value of 8.14227*10-
14
. There is no evidence that the means of each of the different types of trials are all equal
to each other. There is a basically 0% chance that results as extreme as these came from
Table 11
Two-Sample t-Test of the Ultraviolet A Intensity Difference of the Yellow Filter and the
Polarizer Filter
Goudie-McCloskey 24
Assumptions:
Two simple random samples from two different filters
Both samples are normally distributed based on the box plots (Figures 7)
Neither sample has 30 data points, but the data is normal so proceed with
caution
The population of all light intensity of ultraviolet A is greater than ten
times the sample size, of the total trials of 100.
Reject Ho with an alpha level of 0.05, which is greater than the p-value of 2.870 x
10-4. There is evidence that the polarizer filter blocks more ultraviolet A rays than the
yellow filter. If Ho were true, there would be an almost 0% chance of getting the results
Table 12
Two-Sample t-Test of the Ultraviolet B Intensity Difference of the Yellow Filter and the
Polarizer Filter
Goudie-McCloskey 25
Assumptions:
Two simple random samples from two different filters
Both samples are normally distributed based on the box plots (Figures 8)
Neither sample has 30 data points, but the data is normal so proceed with
caution
The population of all light intensity of ultraviolet A is greater than ten
times the sample size, of the total trials of 100
Reject Ho with an alpha level of 0.05, which is greater than the p-value of 4.160 x
10-4. There is evidence that the polarizer filter blocks more ultraviolet B rays than the
yellow filter. If Ho were true, there would be an almost 0% chance of getting the results
Conclusion
The purpose of this experiment was to determine which light source of LEDs,
computer monitors, or phones produces the highest ultraviolet intensity and to determine
which filter of a yellow filter or a polarizer filter blocked most of this intensity. Since
there were three light sources being tested, an ANOVA statistical test was used to
compare the mean light intensity of each sample from each population. The polarizer and
yellow filters were analyzed with a two sample t-test. The hypothesis that the monitor
would produce the highest intensity of ultraviolet light was accepted with p-value of
8.140 * 10-14, as seen in figure 9 on page 23, and the polarizer filter would block the most
intensity of ultraviolet A light was accepted with a p-value of 2.870 * 10-4, as seen in
figure 10 on page 25, and also block the most ultraviolet B intensity with a p-value 4.160
The results from the experiment support the hypothesis. The mean of the
ultraviolet B intensity for the monitor was -0.1694 mW/m2, which was much higher than
the mean intensity of the phone, -1.711 mW/m2, and the LED, -2.388 mW/m2. The UVA
sensor did not read any intensity for the light sources, but this does not mean there are
none. There is a possibility that there was ultraviolet A radiation emitted by the light
sources, but the intensity was not strong enough to be read by the sensor. As for the
filters, the polarizer filter blocked more of the ultraviolet A and B than the yellow filter.
The mean for the difference in ultraviolet A intensity with the polarizer filter was 4304
mW/m2, which is significantly higher than the difference with the yellow filter, 2803
mW/m2. The mean for the difference in ultraviolet B intensity with the polarizer filter was
332.4 mW/m2, which is also significantly higher than the difference with the yellow filter,
225.1 mW/m2. Though the polarizer filter had a larger range for blocking both the
ultraviolet A and B intensity than the yellow filter, it does not make the data less credible.
The fact that no intensity for the ultraviolet A is a result of the small overlap of the
ultraviolet A wavelengths and the visible light spectrum.The UVA sensor would only read
waves from 315 nm to 400 nm(Light and Eye), and the visible light spectrum is from
350 nm to 750 nm, and there was only 50 nm of overlap. The polarizer filter was
determined to be the better filter based on the results of the experiment, and the science
behind the polarizer filter supports it. A polarizer filter blocks any non perpendicular
light, and much of the ultraviolet rays from the sun are scattered by the atmosphere. This
allowed most of the ultraviolet rays to be blocked by the polarizer filter. As for the yellow
filter, it was meant to block the visible light portion of the ultraviolet rays by making the
blue or violet light white. When adding light, a blue or violet light added with yellow
Goudie-McCloskey 28
light (a combination of red and green light) make a white light which does not fall under
the ultraviolet portion of the visible light spectrum. The yellow filter used for this
experiment was slightly opaque which may have increased the amount of intensity it
blocked.
The light sources were used because they are very prominent in everyday life.
More light sources could have been tested, but the data would have only applied to a
smaller audience. The website used to simulate a more realistic amount of colors that are
Multiple of each light source type were used to find a mean that better represented the
population. The filters were tested using the sun since there was no evidence of
ultraviolet A being emitted from the screen to be blocked by the filter. The experimental
design constructed for this experiment allowed for the experiment to be done in a timely
manner. Although the experiment was a success, there were some possible errors that
were encountered. One possible error that was noticed was the fact that moving outside
the darkroom caused some variation with the ultraviolet B. This was concluded to be due
to some ultraviolet rays being emitted in the next room, and the researches stood
completely still during each trial to prevent variation from the movement. Another
possible error that may have affected the data was the filters not being perpendicular to
the light source, but the range for each light source was small enough to continue the
This research can be applied to many fields. If furthered, devices could be made
safer and lessen the chance of someone contracting cancer or macular degeneration at an
early age. When looking into what materials to build a screen out of, companies can make
Goudie-McCloskey 29
a safer decision for their customers. People will also know to reduce the amount of time
spent looking at a computer or phone a day. When it comes to sunglasses, polarized ones
are the best at protecting us from ultraviolet rays. People can also choose to wear
polarized glasses when indoors to reduce the effects from LEDs and different screens.
continued, one could use different light sources or filters to see if other filters or
alternative light sources are safer. Different environments could also be used to measure
the amount of ultraviolet radiation a person experiences, for example, offices or schools.
It would be advised to use an UVA sensor that is more sensitive than the one used in this
experiment to record very low amounts of radiation. Since the sun is the primary source
of ultraviolet radiation, the best method of protection from the sun's powerful rays could
To reiterate, this research was to determine which commonly found light source
produced the highest intensity of ultraviolet rays and which filter, polarizer or yellow, is
best at reducing ultraviolet intensity. This was determined through an ANOVA test and
the use of multiple t-tests. This research will help prevent possible causes of cancer from
becoming a big problem, and it will help reduce macular degeneration at an early age. It
will be used to help find new possible sources of ultraviolet rays and at the same time,
reduce their negative effects on humans. This research will help further research to
determine what light sources produce more ultraviolet rays and better ways to further
Acknowledgements
Mr. McMillian
Mrs. Cybulski
Mr. Supal
Our Parents
Goudie-McCloskey 31
Materials:
TI-Nspire Calculator
Procedure:
1. Assign each trial an integer from one to n, n being the total number of trials..
9. Type in one comma n (n is the number you previously assigned to your highest
value) Ex.(1,5) The number that appears will be your first trial.
10. Repeat steps 7 through 9, assigning each trial to however many times you
generated a number. If a number comes up twice, ignore it and continue.
ANOVA:
An ANOVA test was run on the results to decide if the means of the three samples
are equal or not. In order to do this, the sum of all of the results is divided by the sum of
the trials in order to receive the sample mean of all of the data. The mean square group of
the data, or the variation among sample means between each population, is then
calculated by dividing the sum of each product of the sample size and the square of the
difference in the sample mean and overall sample mean by the number of sample minus
one. The next step is to find the mean square error, or the variation among individuals in
all samples of each population. To do this, the sum of the products of each trials number
of observations minus one and the square of its sample standard deviation must be
divided by the difference in total number of observations and the amount samples. The
quotient of the mean square group and the mean square error gives the value for the F-
distribution, which is used with the degrees of freedom to achieve a p-value. The degrees
of freedom are found by dividing the number of samples minus one by the difference in
the total number of observations and the number of samples. For all ANOVA tests the
null hypothesis is that all of the means are equal to each other, and the alternative
hypothesis is that all the means are not equal to each other i.e. Ho: 1=2=3=4 , Ha:
1234.
x 10(1.711)+10(0.18215)+10(2.388)
30
x= -1.42705
Figure 12 shows the calculation of the statistic x-bar for the overall data. This will
be used to solve for the rest of the variables used in the ANOVA test.
n1 (x 1x )2 +n2 (x 2x )2 +n 3( x3 x)2
MSG=
I 1
2 2 2
10(1.7111.42705) +10 (0.182151.42705) +10(2.3881.42705)
MSG=
31
MSG= 12.7691
Figure 13 shows the calculations for the MSG used in the ANOVA test. The MSG
is like the average of the I squared deviations of the means of the samples from x-bar, the
MSE= 0.332878
Figure 14 show the sample calculation for the MSE of the ANOVA test. The MSE
MSG
F=
MSE
12.7691
F=
0.332878
F= 38.3597
Figure 15 shows the sample calculation for the F statistic. The F statistic is what is
I 1
DF=
NI
31
DF=
303
DF = 0.074074
Figure 16 shows the sample calculation for the degrees of freedom. The Degrees
of Freedom are used in tandem with the F statistics and the statistical Table for p values
(or similar tools) to find the P-value. In this case the P-value is equal to 8.14*10-14.
Two-Sample t-Test:
A two-sample t-test was run on the results to decide if the means of two samples
differ significantly. The mean of yellow filter (UVA), x 1 , minus the mean of polarizer
filter (UVB), x 2 , over the square root of the sample deviation of yellow filter (UVA)
and polarizer filter (UVB), s 1 , squared over the population of yellow filter (UVA) and
polarizer filter (UVB), n1 , plus the sample deviation of high wrapping and low gauge,
s 2 , squared over the population of high wrapping and low gauge, n2 , equals t .
x 1x 2
t=
The variable t is the number of standard deviations away from 0 that ( x 1x 2 ) is on
a t-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to (n-1) where n is the lower of the two
sample sizes. Shown below is a sample calculation using the above formula. The data
x 1x 2
t=
43042802.68
t=
t= 0.924359
Figure 17, above, shows a sample calculation for a statistical test. To correlate a
t-value with a p-value, a t-table or a more sophisticated calculation tool must be used.
Using a table with nine degrees of freedom, a t-value of 4.78 would correspond to a p-
value less than 0.0005 . Using a more sophisticated calculation tool, a t-value of 0.9244
Works Cited
<http://www.bluelightexposed.com/#what-is-bue-light>.
"Blue Light Has a Dark Side." Harvard Health Publications. N.p., 1 May 2012. Web.
Goudie-McCloskey 36
<http://www.health.harvard.edu/staying-healthy/blue-light-has-a-dark-side>.
<https://droualb.faculty.mjc.edu/Course%20Materials/Physiology%20101/
Chapter%20Notes/Fall%202007/chapter_10%20Fall%202007.htm>.
<http://re-timer.com/the-science/research/>.
Meerl, Kim. "Blue Light from Electronics Disturbs Sleep, Especially for Teenagers."
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/blue-light-from-
electronics-disturbs-sleep-especially-for-teenagers/2014/08/29/3edd2726-27a7-
11e4-958c-268a320a60ce_story.html>.
Good, Gregory W.,Light And Eye Damage, Light and Eye Damage American
<http://www.chemguide.co.uk/analysis/uvvisible/theory.html>.