Sunteți pe pagina 1din 9

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jretconser

The effects of mall renovation on shopping values, satisfaction and


spending behaviour
Jean-Charles Chebat a,c,n, Richard Michon b, Narjes Haj-Salem a, Sandra Oliveira a
a
HEC Montreal, 3000, Chemin de la Cte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, QC, Canada H3T 2A7
b
Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3
c
Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Israel

art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Managers renovate malls to keep up with newer shopping centres and retail formats that erode trafc.
Received 7 January 2014 This paper investigates shoppers' psychological processes that trigger changes in spending behaviour in
Received in revised form the renovated mall. Renovation has a direct impact on the perception of the mall atmosphere and an
23 April 2014
indirect one on shoppers' hedonic and utilitarian values, satisfaction, and spending. Renovation affects
Accepted 23 April 2014
shoppers' spending through the perception of utilitarian shopping benets.
Available online 23 May 2014
This study is the rst of its kind to explore the effects of mall renovation on shoppers' spending. It
Keywords: focuses on the effect of renovations on shoppers' holistic perception of the mall atmosphere. The
Shopping mall hedonic benet contributes more to shoppers' satisfaction than does the utilitarian value. However, the
Atmosphere
utilitarian value affects shoppers' spending while the hedonic value does not.
Shopping values
& 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Shopping behaviour
Mall renovation
Spending behaviour

1. Introduction The face lifting of a mall combines numerous changes ranging


from resurfaced parking spaces, a brand new facade, redesigned
Shopping malls begin to decline at about age 15 in the absence entrances, revamped common areas, spacious corridors, modernised
of substantial addition or renovation (Flynn, 1987, p. 120). lighting, improved signage, uid shopper circulation, enhanced key
Managers renovate malls to keep up with newer shopping centres tenant's visibility, and reorganised store layouts (Feldman, 2004). For
and retail formats that erode trafc. Strategic deterrence can DTZ (http://www.dtz-ugl.com), a Chicago-based worldwide property
explain shopping centre renovations and expansion decisions manager, mall refurbishing increases the value of the retail space,
(Clapp et al., 2011). The law of commercial gravity (Huff, 1963) is improves the functionality, and reposition the facility in the market
a constant reminder that newer and larger shopping centres are through its development and change of tenant-mix (DZT, 20012).
likely to displace trafc according to their attraction power (size) Increased revenues from refurbished malls are derived from
and their relative proximity. The International Council of Shopping both higher shopper trafc and enhanced shopper spending. This
Centers (ICSC) found that consumers with similar shopping trips paper investigates shoppers' psychological processes that trigger
and trip durations spend less money per visit in malls surrounded changes in spending behaviour. The theoretical model pinpoints
by competition within a 20-mile radius than in malls without such the mediating constructs hypothesised to relate the renewed
a competition (Lambert and Connolly, 2001). environment to incremental spending. The model was tested by
As new indoor malls, entertainment, and lifestyle shopping administering a questionnaire to shoppers visiting a mall before
centres open, retail tenants are also likely to migrate along with and after the completion of the renovation works. Perceived
shoppers. Rental income in real terms gradually decreases over shopping benets and satisfaction mediate the relationship
time and renovation costs keep increasing. A mall is due for between the renovated mall atmosphere and spending behaviour.
renovation when the marginal cost of renovating equals the This study is the rst of its kind to explore the effects of mall
marginal loss of rental income (Wong and Norman, 1994). renovation on shoppers' spending. It focuses on the effect of
renovations on shoppers' holistic perception of the mall atmosphere.
Hedonic and utilitarian shopping values do not play symmetrical
n
roles. The hedonic benet contributes more to shoppers' satisfaction
Corresponding author. Tel.: 1 514 340 6846; fax: 1 514 340 6097.
E-mail addresses: jean-charles.chebat@hec.ca (J.-C. Chebat),
than does the utilitarian value. However, the utilitarian value, which
rmichon@ryerson.ca (R. Michon), narjes.hajsalem@hec.ca (N. Haj-Salem), has been widely ignored in the literature, affects shoppers' spending
sandra.oliveira@hec.ca (S. Oliveira). while the hedonic value does not.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.04.010
0969-6989/& 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
J.-C. Chebat et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618 611

H1 comfortable atmosphere, makes it inviting for shoppers to stay


longer. (Liddane, 2013), creates a more exciting and inviting
Utilitarian atmosphere for shoppers (van den Berg, 2003), and gives malls a
Value
magical ambience at night that it previously lacked (Chain Store
H3a H4a Age, 1992). Mall renovation makes the shopping centres more
H2
H5 attractive to the general public by creating a more trendy atmo-
Mall
Renovation Atmosphere Satisfaction Spending sphere (Bamrung, 2003), and increases the atmosphere of
festival marketplace (Knapschaeffer, 1990). Moreover, renovation
H3b H4b improves the circulation of the mall (Bodamer, 2010).
The environmental psychology paradigm (Mehrabian and Russel,
Hedonic
Value 1974) best explains the effect of the mall atmosphere on shoppers'
response. Environmental psychologists suggest that shoppers are
Fig. 1. Theoretical model. likely to react in two contrasting forms of behaviour: approach and
avoidance. Approach is a desire to stay, explore and afliate, and
avoidance is the opposite. Shoppers in a state of approach behaviour
The conceptual framework outlines that (a) the renovated mall are more likely than others to extend their shopping trip and expose
mediates the holistic perception of ambient factors making up the themselves to additional buying opportunities. In a pleasing
mall atmosphere, (b) the perceived mall atmosphere inuences ambiance, shoppers are also in a better mood. Therefore, they are
hedonic and utilitarian shopping values, (c) shopping values subject to arousal and more likely to favourably process ambient
mediate shopper satisfaction, and (d) satisfaction, in turn, impacts cues. Obermiller and Bitner (1984) observed that shoppers who
shoppers' spending (Fig. 1). The model is tested in situ, using a viewed retail products in an emotionally pleasing environment
quasi-experimental Partial Least Square model (PLS), with a before evaluated products more positively than consumers who viewed
(n 262) and after (n 283) sample. the same products in a less pleasant atmosphere.
The overall renovated mall design is expected to generate
excitement (Wakeeld and Baker, 1998). Shoppers perceive the
2. Conceptual framework new mall environment in a holistic process rather than piecemeal
(Mattila and Wirtz, 2001; Michon et al., 2005; Gilboa and Vilnai-
2.1. Effects of mall renovation on spending Yavetz, 2013). Atmospheric factors should be regarded as a
basket of environmental cues that are perceived as a whole
The empirical ndings regarding the effects of renovations on (Wakeeld and Baker, 1998).
economic performances point in opposite directions. On the one
hand, Gomez et al. (2004) found that renovated stores show
higher changes in sales performance. LeHew and Fairhurst (2000) H2. A successful mall renovation favourably mediates the holistic
also report convergent ndings: Renovating a centre benets shopping ambiance.
tenants as well as mall owners. Sales volume and market share
improve. Renovation was recommended as one key solution to
improve shopping malls nancial situation (Carlson, 1991). This 2.3. Mall atmosphere affects shopping values
strategy is based on the general knowledge mall managers have, as
reported in the trade press. Shoppers' response to the mall environment will manifest itself
On the other hand, the International Council of Shopping through hedonic and utilitarian shopping values or benets (Babin
Centres (ICSC) reports that mall refurbishment completed in the et al., 1994). The hedonic shopping value accounts for the emo-
prior 12 months has no effect on the number of visits or the tions associated with shopping; the pleasure of shopping, escape
amount of spending per trip. Duration of shopping trips in from daily routine, being immersed in exciting new products, and
renovated malls is slightly longer than in those that have not been spending time in an enjoyable way. The utilitarian value is goal-
renovated. Lambert and Connolly (2001) conclude that shoppers' directed, task-oriented, and successfully completed. McGoldrick
response is not overwhelmingly favourable to renovation and and Pieros (1998) note that consumers with strong shopping
expansion activities. More importantly, they suggest that other motives experience more pleasure and arousal.
factors such as tenant mix and the presence or absence of some Malls enhance hedonic shopping by making shopping a relaxing,
retailers may play a bigger role. Effective mall renovation requires self-gratifying, entertaining and an emotional activity (Westbrook
more than cosmetic changes. Attracting the right tenant mix is and Black, 1985; Dawson, Bloch Ridgway, 1990; Babin et al., 1994;
just part of this turnaround strategy (Feldman, 2004) to create a Kang and Kim, 1999; Rintamki et al., 2006.; Millan and Howard,
new shopping ambiance. 2007; Teller and Reutterer, 2008). Design, personal space, dcor,
lighting, ambient music, and scents generate emotional responses
H1. Mall renovation has no direct effects on shoppers' spending. and positively inuence shoppers' desire to stay in the mall (Dennis,
Its inuence is mediated by the perception of the mall atmo- 2005, p. 46; Donovan and Rossiter, 1982; Wakeeld and Baker, 1998).
sphere, shopping values and shopper satisfaction. Successful mall refurbishing is expected to help shoppers achieve
their shopping objectives. The utilitarian shopping value is driven by
2.2. Renovation affects the mall atmosphere a sense of accomplishment or a goal to obtain sought-after goods
during the shopping trip (Olsen and Skallerud, 2011). Mall store
A major purpose of renovation is to improve the ambiance of layout and reshufed tenants improve merchandising. Product and
the shopping venues. Though this relation is intuitively obvious brand availability has an impact on the utilitarian value (Cottet et al.,
and vitally important to retailers, no academic research has so far 2006). Easier mall access and effective signage facilitate waynding
dealt with it. In contrast, the trade literature underscores articles (Dennis et al., 2010). The reduction of the search time, fatigue and
where consultants, mall and retail managers demonstrate a high psychological costs improves the utilitarian shopping value which
level of enthusiasm for specic renovations that they assume will impact on shoppers' perceived mall equity and loyalty (Chebat et al.,
enhance retail atmosphere. For example, renovation enhances a 2009).
612 J.-C. Chebat et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618

H3a. An improved mall atmosphere increases the hedonic shop- studies focus on purchase intentions rather than actual purchases
ping value. (e.g., Jones et al., 2000; Taylor and Baker 1994). Signicant portions of
customers who claim to be highly satised with a specic store do
H3b. An Improved mall atmosphere increases the utilitarian shop-
not consider this store as their destination of choice (Mgi, 1995).
ping value.
In the same vein, Mgi (2003) found that the economic shopping
orientation was the motivational factor with the largest overall
2.4. Effect of shopping values on shoppers' satisfaction impact on customers' share-of-visits and share-of-wallets. Simi-
larly, Keiningham et al. (2008) showed that, unexpectedly, custo-
The retail literature emphasises a strong link between shopping mers' overall level of satisfaction was not tied to changes in sales.
values and shoppers' satisfaction. Some studies show that both Bernhardt et al. (2000) point out that most CSSP-related studies
hedonic and utilitarian shopping values affect satisfaction (e.g., rely on cross-sectional analysis for statistical inference, not on
Eroglu et al., 2005a). Other researchers observe that the hedonic rm-specic data as did a few studies (e.g. Bernhardt et al., 2000;
shopping value inuences satisfaction to a greater extent than the Rucci et al., 1998; Anderson and Mittal, 2000). Gomez et al. (2004)
utilitarian value (Cottet et al., 2006). Jones et al. (2006) note that pertinently stresses, [I]t is especially desirable to use rm-specic
satisfaction is more likely to be inuenced by the non-product- data so the linkages between satisfaction and performance are
related, hedonic aspects of shopping than traditional utilitarian examined in the context of a rm's strategy. As a store of stores
orientations. Similarly, Chang and Fang (2012) posit that, in depart- (Underhill, 2004), the shopping mall provides rm-specic data
ment stores, the hedonic shopping value has a greater effect on before and after renovation, as recommended by Gomez et al.
satisfaction and word-of-mouth than utilitarian shopping value. (2004). However, the statistical nuances pointed out by Gomez
Conversely, Babin et al. (2007) found that the utilitarian et al. (2004) related to the asymmetry and non-linearity of the
shopping value affects satisfaction more than the hedonic counter- relation cannot be tested here since we have a two-stage process
part in the case of gift shopping. The authors reason that gift of improvement. The commonly accepted hypothesis that satisfac-
shopping may be more like work than other shopping trips as tion positively impacts purchases is tested:
already pointed out by Babin and Attaway (2000). Mgi (2003)
writes, the economic shopping orientation was the motivational H5. Satised shoppers in the renovated mall are more likely to
factor with the largest overall impact on customer share. The spend more.
extent literature points in two directions:
3. Methodology
H4a. The hedonic value increases shoppers' satisfaction visiting
the renovated shopping mall. The evaluation of the effects of renovation on mall shoppers was
H4b. The utilitarian value increases shoppers' satisfaction visiting tested with a before-and-after method. This methodology used in
the renovated shopping mall. previous retailing studies (e.g. Downs and Haynes, 1984) can mea-
sure the impact of renovations and tenant additions (Wakeeld and
2.5. Effects of satisfaction on shoppers' spending Baker, 1998). As Downs and Haynes (1984) suggest, quasi-
experimental design provides a high level of external validity. The
The effect of satisfaction on shoppers' spending may seem like contrast between before and after mall renovation is similar to what
a truism. A number of studies contradict common sense. While the was done by Chebat and colleagues in other atmospheric studies,
predecessors of satisfaction have been studied extensively, the contrasting the absence or presence of music (Morrin and Chebat,
effects of satisfaction on spending have not received the attention 2005; Eroglu et al., 2005a), and the absence or presence of scents
they deserve in spite of their obvious importance. (e.g., Chebat and Michon, 2003; Chebat et al., 2009).
Anderson and Sullivan's (1993) seminal study looked at the In this current research project, special attention is paid to
antecedents to and consequences of customer satisfaction. Their exogenous factors such as socio-demographics and seasonality to
sample consisted of some 22,000 consumers patronising more isolate the specic effects of the renovation.
than a hundred stores and services in Sweden. They conrmed the
basic tenet of the Customer Satisfaction-Sales Performance Para- 3.1. Sampling and data collection
digm (CSSP) that satisfaction enhances spending.
Other studies tend to conrm the commercial and nancial The data were collected in a major North American regional
effects of satisfaction. Lee and Hwan (2005) conclude their shopping mall in 2000. According to the mall owner, about seven
research on Taiwanese customers in the nancial services, saying million people visit the mall every year to window shop or
that satisfaction is an antecedent of protability. A similar U.K. purchase merchandise and services. This mall includes 150 shops,
study (Yeung and Ennew, 2001) supports the belief that customer restaurants, services and cinemas. After 36 years, property owners
satisfaction can and does have a measurable impact on nancial were forced to admit that the mall had lost some of its lustre.
performance. Adding pressure, a new 200-store plus lifestyle shopping centre
Some authors propose nuanced ndings related to the effects of was about to be built within a few kilometres in a highly central
satisfaction on sales. In a service setting, Kamakura et al. (2002) location. The renovation project modied the architecture of the
concludes that satisfaction is a necessary but not sufcient condi- building, parking spaces, exterior and interior signage, lighting,
tion for nancial success: it is important that the branch manager and wall decorations. Based on the mall directory, the refurbish-
not only be efcient in achieving superior satisfaction () but also ment led to a signicant tenant rollover, attracting new fast-
be efcient in translating such attitudes and intentions into fashion and cheap chic international chains.
relevant behaviours. Similarly, for Mittal et al. (2005), the Using the mall intercept technique, 565 self-administered
association between customer satisfaction and long-term nancial questionnaires consisting of 21 items, were collected by trained
performance is positive and relatively stronger for rms that M.Sc. marketing students. There were 545 usable questionnaires in
successfully achieve a dual emphasis, successfully achieving both the combined dataset. The before (n 262) and after renovation
customer satisfaction and efciency simultaneously. sample (n 283) was agged with a dummy variable. The before
Managers tend to consider as granted the effects of satisfaction on and after data collection took place in April and September. Each
nancial performance (Mgi, 2003). They should not because most mall intercept lasted a full week administering questionnaires in
J.-C. Chebat et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618 613

Table 1
Socio-demographic proles.

Before renovation After renovation Total Pearson Chi-square df Sig.

Gender
Female 61% 56% 58% 1.785 1 0.181
Male 39% 44% 42%

Age
1824 yrs 39% 42% 40% 4.724 5 0.450
2534 yrs 15% 17% 16%
3544 yrs 11% 9% 10%
4554 yrs 13% 12% 13%
5565 yrs 12% 13% 12%
65 yrs 10% 6% 8%

Marital status
Married 40% 34% 37% 1.611 2 0.447
Single 45% 49% 47%
Other 15% 17% 16%

Number of children
None 74% 77% 76% 1.018 3 0.797
under 18 yrs
One 9% 9% 9%
Two 12% 10% 11%
Three 4% 4% 4%

Education level
Primary 3% 3% 3% 4.307 4 0.366
Secondary 34% 33% 34%
Post-secondary 28% 33% 31%
University 33% 32% 32%
Not specied 1% 1%

Main occupation
Working 40% 43% 41% 5.62 4 0.229
Studying 30% 32% 31%
Retired 22% 14% 18%
Looking for work 3% 5% 4%
At home 5% 7% 6%
N
Usable quest 262 283 545

proportion of trafc by day of week and time of day. The two However, it is hypothesised the mall renovation signicantly
survey weeks were considered by property managers as typical of affects mediating constructs that inuence shopper spending.
the mall activity. Regional twelve-month productivity seasonal The distribution of shoppers' spending (the dependent vari-
indices for malls are the same for the months of April and able) being strongly leptokurtic, the variable was log-transformed
September (International Council of Shopping Centers, 2013). [ln (x 1)] to account for shoppers with zero purchases. Twenty-
The before and after cohorts has similar socio-demographic four cases with extreme spending values were deleted from the
proles (i.e. gender, age, marital status, number of children under analysis.
18 years old, education and occupation). None of the chi-square Table 1 outlines that all demographics variables (e.g. age, marital
statistics in Table 1 is signicant despite the size of the cohorts. In status, children at home, education level and occupation) are
other words, the renovated mall did not attract different invariant in both before and after samples. However, gender and
shopper segments. age groups described in Table 1 are used as covariates since they are
known to moderate the effects of hedonic and utilitarian shopping
values, and shopper overall satisfaction (e.g., Carpenter and Balija,
3.2. Construct measures 2010; Devadas and Manohar, 2012; Pan and Zinkhan, 2006). Age
and gender are considered as proxies for the family life cycle. In
All measurement scales are drawn from the academic literature addition, the hedonic shopping value is more likely to be prevalent
for their relevance and their psychometric validity. Table 2 among females, and younger and older shoppers (Bloch et al., 1994;
describes all constructs and measurement items. The mall atmo- Jackson et al., 2011).
sphere scale is derived from Fisher (1974) who identied factors On top of constructs and measurement items, Table 2 also
affecting environmental quality and perceived crowdedness. outlines outer factor loadings, cross-loadings, composite reliability
Hedonic and utilitarian shopping values are borrowed from and average variance extracted. Outer loadings were computed
Babin et al. (1994). Items measuring shopper satisfaction are taken from a conrmatory factor analysis using SmartPLS (Ringle et al.,
from Maxham and Netemeyer (2002). 2005). The rationale for using PLS is discussed in the next section.
Following Bagozzi and Yi (1989), the before and after renova- Composite reliability (Raykov, 1997; Werts et al., 1974) is
tion condition is represented as a dummy (0/1) variable, as in a preferred to Cronbach's alpha (1951) that is believed to under-
quasi-experimental setting. Because there are only two conditions, estimate scale reliability. Fornell and Larcker (1981) suggest
this procedure is more parsimonious than a multigroup model. convergent validity if the average variance extracted (AVE) is at
As hypothesised (H1), the mall renovation has no direct effect least 0.50, showing that the explained variance is greater than the
on shopper spending. Average spending before and after renova- measurement error. The loading of each indicator is expected to be
tion were $65.13 (sd 102.19) and $71.35 (sd 97.92), respectively. greater than all of its cross-loading (Chin, 2001).
614 J.-C. Chebat et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618

Table 2
Measurement scales with factor loadings.

Rhoa AVEb Atmosphere Hedonic Utilitarian Satisfaction


value value

Atmosphere (Fisher, 1974) 0.952 0.768


Not lively-lively 0.832 0.288 0.194 0.340
Dull-bright 0.886 0.354 0.211 0.421
Drab-colorful 0.893 0.382 0.221 0.487
Depressing-cheerful 0.873 0.382 0.240 0.473
Uninteresting-interesting 0.872 0.409 0.254 0.478
Boring-stimulating 0.903 0.418 0.213 0.471

Hedonic value (Babin et al., 1994) 0.825 0.54


This shopping trip was truly a joy. 0.366 0.783 0.324 0.323
This shopping trip truly felt like an escape. 0.227 0.675  0.020 0.239
I enjoyed being immersed in exciting new products. 0.303 0.740 0.205 0.276
Compared with other things I could have done, the time spent shopping was truly 0.337 0.741 0.189 0.260
enjoyable.

Utilitarian value (Babin et al., 1994) 0.759 0.523


While shopping, I found just the item(s) I was looking for. 0.220 0.235 0.895 0.256
I couldn't buy what I really needed (reversed). 0.126 0.061 0.537 0.075
I accomplished just what I wanted to on this shopping trip. 0.196 0.232 0.693 0.223

Satisfaction (Maxham et al., 2002) 0.956 0.878


I would recommend this Mall to my friends. 0.457 0.340 0.208 0.906
This Mall is a good place to shop. 0.461 0.325 0.259 0.945
I am satised with this Mall. 0.513 0.390 0.298 0.959

Factor loadings in bold face are outer loadings while those in regular font are cross-loadings.
a
Raykov0 s (1997) composite reliability rho ().
b
Average variance extracted (Fornell-Larcker, 1981).

Table 3 Table 4
Construct correlation and discriminant validity. Total effects.

Atmosphere Hedonic Utilitarian Satisfaction Spending Total effects Coefcient Standard deviation T statistics
value value
Renovation-Atmosphere 0.138 0.043 3.208
Atmosphere 0.876a Renovation-Hedonic value 0.059 0.019 3.039
Hedonic 0.427 0.736a Renovation-Utilitarian value 0.035 0.013 2.783
value Renovation-Satisfaction 0.026 0.009 2.810
Utilitarian 0.255 0.261 0.723a Renovation-Spending 0.010 0.005 2.215
value
Satisfaction 0.510 0.377 0.275 0.937a Atmosphere-Hedonic value 0.427 0.041 10.450
Spending 0.028 0.067 0.335 0.120 1 Atmosphere-Utilitarian value 0.255 0.043 5.933
Atmosphere-Satisfaction 0.188 0.030 6.250
a
Square root of average variance extracted (Fornell and Larcker, 1981). Spending is Atmosphere-Spending 0.075 0.025 3.067
measured by a single indicator.

Hedonic value-Satisfaction 0.328 0.043 7.566


Hedonic value-Spending  0.020 0.044 0.460
Utilitarian .330
Value (7.693)
.138 Utilitarian value-Satisfaction 0.189 0.046 4.119
(3.208) .255 .189
(5.933) (4.119) Utilitarian value-Spending 0.330 0.043 7.693
Mall Spending
Renovation Atmosphere Satisfaction
Satisfaction-Spending 0.028 0.050 0.553
.427 .328 .094
(10.450) (7.566) (2.398)
Age-Spending 0.094 0.039 2.398
Hedonic Age Gender-Spending 0.021 0.042 0.496
Value

Covariate Paths in italic represent indirect effects, extracted from the PLS output.

Fig. 2. PLS nal model.

Discriminant validity is shown in Table 3 based on the meth- 3.3. Model


odology proposed by Fornell and Larcker (1981). There is discri-
minant validity when each construct AVE is greater than its shared The conceptual model was developed through a partial least
variance. The square root of the average variance extracted should square model focusing on one dependent variable, shoppers'
be greater than the absolute value of the standardized correlations spending. The model serves two purposes. First, it determines if
with other constructs. the mall renovation is associated with shopper's spending. Second,
J.-C. Chebat et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618 615

Table 5
Testing for mediation and indirect effects.

Explained variable (Y) Explanatory variable (X) Mediators Covariates

Spending Renovation Atmosphere Age


Hedonic value Gender
Utilitarian value
Satisfaction

Direct effect of X on Y: Effect 0.2739, t 1.4383, p 0.1511

Indirect effects Renovation-Atmosphere-Utilitarian value-Spending


Indirect effect of X on Y: Effect 0.0210, Bootstrap SE 0.0131, LLCI 0.0048, ULCI 0.0638

Model summary: R 0.3535, R-sq 0.1250, F 8.4062, df1 7, df2 412, p 0.0000

Estimated with Hayes' (2013) PROCESS.

it identies the processes through which shoppers respond to the the dependent variable, shopper spending (0.010, t 2.215). The
renovated atmosphere. perception of the mall atmosphere indirectly inuences shopper
While the covariance-based structural equation model (CB- satisfaction (0.188, t 6.250) and shopper spending (0.075,
SEM) is regarded as state-of-the-art for conrmatory analysis, t3.067). The signicant effect of the mall renovation (t2.215)
partial least square (PLS-SEM) is mainly used for theory develop- on spending is mediated by the perception of the mall atmosphere
ment and predictions. Rather than trying to minimise the errors in and the utilitarian shopping value.
the covariance matrix, the PLS algorithm maximises the explained Indirect and interaction effects were tested using Hayes' (2013)
variance of the dependent variable (Hair et al., 2011), in this case, PROCESS. The latter is a computational tool for path analysis-based
shoppers' spending. moderation and mediation analysis as well as their combination as
SmartPLS 2.0 (Ringle et al., 2005) is run in two stages; rst, a a conditional process model (Hayes, 2013). PROCESS generates
measurement model and, then, a structural model (Henseler et al., direct and indirect effects in mediation and mediated moderation
2009). The model is based on the centroid weighting algorithm models, conditional effects in moderation models, and conditional
because it is well adapted to cases where the manifest variables in indirect effects in moderated mediation models with a single or
a block are strongly correlated (Vinzi et al., 2010). A non- multiple mediators.
parametric bootstrap procedure is used to estimate the statistical PLS bootstrapped latent means constructs were entered in
signicance of factor loadings and path coefcients (Chin, 2001; Hayes' (2013) PROCESS to validate indirect and interaction effects.
Davison et al., 2003). Bootstrapping allows PLS to accommodate Mediation testing takes the form of a general linear model where
smaller sample size (Goodhue et al., 2006) shopper spending is the dependent variable (Y) and mall renova-
tion in the explanatory variable (X). Mall atmosphere, shopping
values and shopper satisfaction are mediating variables, whilst age
4. Research ndings and gender are covariate.
The overall model summary (Table 5) highlights a signicant
4.1. Direct effects regression (f8.406, df1 7, df2 412, p0.000), with a coefcient
of determination of.125. The GLM shows that the direct effect of
Results from the PLS sample bootstrap are presented in Fig. 2, the mall renovation on shoppers' spending is not signicant
for direct effects, and in Table 4, for total effects. Mall renovation (effect0.275, t 1.438, p0.151). However, Hayes' model conrms
positively inuences the perception of the mall atmosphere (0.138, that the indirect effect of the mall renovation on shoppers' spending is
t 3.208), in support of H2. In turn, the mall atmosphere has a mediated by the mall atmosphere and the utilitarian shopping value
signicant impact on both utilitarian (0.255, t 5.933) and hedonic (effect0.021, lower condence interval 0.005, upper condence
(0.427, t 10.450) shopping values. This nding veries . Both interval 0.064, thusa0). The path linking renovation (before and
utilitarian (0.189, t 4.119) and hedonic (0.328, t 7.566) shopping after), the mall atmosphere, the utilitarian value and shoppers'
values affect shopper satisfaction, as posited by . Shopper satisfac- spending is signicant and convergent with the PLS model.
tion has no signicant bearing on spending (0.028, t 0.553), thus
rejecting H5. Of the two covariates that may inuence shoppers'
spending, only age (0.094, t 2.398) appears to be signicant. 5. Discussion
While shoppers' satisfaction fails to impact spending, the
model alternatively explores the direct effects of shopping values The tested model illustrates that the mall renovation has no
on shoppers' spending. The hedonic shopping value affects shop- direct effect on shoppers' spending. The physical transformation of
pers' satisfaction but has no inuence on shoppers' spending. On the shopping centre will only be successful if shoppers perceived a
the other hand, the utilitarian shopping value (0.330, t7.693) has more pleasant and congruent shopping atmosphere. As reminded
a signicant impact on shoppers' spending. by the environmental psychology theory, a favourable shopping
environment will stimulate shoppers to process more information
4.2. Indirect and mediation effects and explore further. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping values
summarise the affective benets from the shopping experience.
Mall renovation has signicant indirect effects (Table 4) on the Shoppers are more likely to be satised from their shopping trip
potential mediators: hedonic (0.059, t 3.039) and utilitarian and spend more money.
(0.035, t 2.783) shopping values and shoppers' satisfaction Research ndings underscore that shoppers' hedonic values,
(0.026, t 2.810). Renovations also have a signicant impact on satisfaction and spending are not necessarily associated. Shopper
616 J.-C. Chebat et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618

spending is dependent on the success of the shopping trip, as shopping malls. The review of the retail trade literature outlines
expressed in the utilitarian shopping value. The discussion below that the effect of renovation on the hedonic dimension of shop-
highlights the mediating mechanism of the mall renovation on ping is taken for granted by mall managers, while the utilitarian
shopper spending. aspects tend to be ancillary.
Paradoxically, shopper satisfaction is not part of the mediation
5.1. Mediation effects process between the mall renovation and shopper spending. Both
shopping values increase satisfaction of shoppers in the renovated
Shopping values mediate the relation between the mall atmo- mall. However, satisfaction does not affect spending. Such ndings
sphere and shopper satisfaction. This effect was equally observed conrm previous studies (e.g., Keiningham et al., 2008) and
in the case of Korean female shoppers (Chang et al., 2004). disconrm others (e.g., Anderson and Sullivan, 1993). Bernhardt
Shopping values were found to mediate the relationship between et al. (2000) explain that that rm-specic data are needed to
crowding, a central element of retail atmospherics, and satisfac- study the relationship between satisfaction and sales. Higher
tion (Eroglu et al., 2005a). A similar mediation effect was shown satisfaction scores could mislead mall managers in believing that
between ambient factors and e-shoppers' satisfaction shopper spending will increase. It appears that the utilitarian
(Warrington, 2002). shopping value score is a better predictor, pinpointing at impor-
From a statistical perspective, the fact that renovation has no tant managerial implications, as discussed below.
direct effects on spending does not preclude the possibility of
mediation. As discussed by Zhao et al. (2010) [T]here need not be
a signicant zero-order effect of X on Y, rxy, to establish media- 6. Managerial implications
tion. The absence of a signicant relation between renovation and
shopper spending combined with the signicant product [renova- When planning for renovations, the atmospheric components
tion ) atmosphere  utilitarian values ) spending] means that of the mall should be selected mostly for helping shoppers to
the utilitarian value constitutes an indirect only mediation accomplish their goals. Experiential shopping has been an ongoing
(Zhao et al., 2010). Zhao et al. (2010) also point out that in the leitmotiv for property owners and retail managers trying to
presence of such mediation; other mediators are unlikely. In entertain shoppers and create excitement. However, shoppers'
other words, the mediation of the utilitarian shopping value likely hedonic response and satisfaction do not seem to be sufcient
explains the process through which renovation affects sales. conditions to induce additional spending. Higher spending is
associated with the utilitarian shopping value. While renovating
5.2. Impact of shopping values malls, managers should focus their resources on elements that will
support shopping goals. Aesthetic mall design is certainly desir-
Research should take into consideration the utilitarian shop- able. However, mall must also be functional to facilitate shoppers'
ping value as a mediator of the effects of retail atmospheric cues task orientation and trigger spending.
on shoppers' response. Utilitarian components may be less gla- Functional mall refurbishing should target easier access and
mourous than hedonic ones but are more cost efcient. parking, signage and maps to facilitate waynding, more open
Store and mall atmosphere have generally been understood to spaces to reduce the negative effect of crowding, clean and
affect emotional responses or the hedonic shopping value (Dennis appealing common areas and food courts so that shoppers stay
et al., 2002). Retail and mall atmospherics also stimulate the longer, and, above all, enhanced store layout that favours trafc
utilitarian shopping value. Shoppers are likely to be attracted to and exploration.
shopping venues where their resources (time, money, search and Mall renovation is not limited to the physical arrangement of
psychological costs) are minimised. Hedonic and utilitarian shop- common spaces. The overhaul will attract new tenants on an
ping values do not play symmetrical roles. The hedonic value expansion path that, in turn, will contribute to the rejuvenation of
contributes more to shoppers' satisfaction, and the utilitarian the mall. A well-managed store layout across the mall is a transaction
value affects shoppers' spending. multiplier for complementary goods or impulse purchases.
Task-oriented shopping contradicts the well-established hedo-
nic shopping concept that may make sense in some super malls or
some agship stores. In more modest and common regional malls, 7. Future research and limitations
such as the one studied here, task orientation takes precedence
over the affective shopping experience. Even though there are many studies looking at the impact of
Renovation is one of the key strategies available to mall retail atmospherics on shopping behaviour, very few of them
managers to inject a new life in the mall by redoing some cosmetic investigate their relevance on the utilitarian value (Turley and
work, refreshing various amenities, reshufing stores and recruit- Milliman, 2000).
ing new tenants. The decision to renovate a mall is the result of the Most malls are regarded as places where shoppers may
depreciation of rental income, the level and rate of change of accomplish necessary tasks in a practical and well-organized
renovation costs, discount rates and varying market conditions way. Much emphasis on experiential shopping has been found
(Wong and Norman, 1994). The effects of renovation on shoppers' in both the trade and the academic retailing literature. The current
spending are real, but fully mediated by utilitarian shopping value. study calls for more attention on the task orientation aspects in
Research ndings illustrate that, in this specic regional mall, shopping malls. It seems to be the rst to relate effects of mall
renovation was generating higher personal spending. They are not renovations on retail spending. It focuses on the effect of renova-
convergent with those of Pan and Zinkhan's (2006) who found tions on shoppers' holistic perception of the mall atmosphere.
that the effects of store atmosphere on retail patronage are Additional research is needed to understand fully the specic
relatively small. Had the current analysis been limited to the effects of major refurbishing investments. Future research should
direct effects of renovation on spending, no signicant effects weight the effect of each specic environmental component on
would have been found (e.g. Zhao et al., 2010); similar to what was shoppers' perceptions and responses.
reported by the ICSC (Lambert and Connolly, 2001). Renovation Mall refurbishing is a major investment that does not happen
affects sales through the mediation of the utilitarian shopping every day and takes time to complete. Measuring the effects of
value. Analogous analyses should be extended to other renovated renovation, while controlling for exogenous factors, is not easily
J.-C. Chebat et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618 617

done within the framework of traditional experimental plans. The Dennis, C., Newman, A., Michon, R., Josko Brakus, J., Tiu Wright, L., 2010. The
post-renovation survey was administered soon after the mall mediating effects of perception and emotion: digital signage in mall atmo-
spherics. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 17 (3), 205215.
refurbishment. The impact of renovations may not have fully Devadas, A., Manohar, H.L., 2012. A cross sectional study on shopping values and
reached its full potential among patrons. It is likely that patrons mall attributes in relation to consumer age and gender. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 31 (1),
might not be fully accustomed to the renovated mall. A post- 1626.
Donovan, R.J., Rossiter, J.R., 1982. Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology
renovation survey administered a year later might have generated approach. J. Retail. 58 (1), 3457.
different results. Downs, P.E., Haynes, J.B., 1984. Examining retail image before and after a
The quasi experiment was conducted in a regional mall in repositioning strategy. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 12 (4), 124.
DZT. 20012, Shopping Centres Refurbishment and Redevelopment, Our compe-
2000. Despite its age, the dataset outlines that a stimuli (mall
tences, www.dtz.com/StaticFiles/UK/DTZ_Refurbishment%20and%20Redevelop
renovation) affects shoppers' perceptions of the mall atmosphere ment.pdf.
and shopping values, and ultimately prompts additional spending, Eroglu, S.A., Machleit, K., Barr, T.F., 2005a. Perceived retail crowding and shopping
in accordance with the environmental psychology paradigm. satisfaction: the role of shopping values. J. Bus. Res. 58 (8), 11461153.
Feldman, L., 2004. Successful investment and turnaround strategies for distressed
Contrary to regional malls, super regional, thematic and life- shopping centre properties. J. Retail Leisure Property 4 (1), 3238.
style malls should attract higher proportions of shoppers in search Fisher, J.D., 1974. Situation-specic variables as determinants of perceived environ-
of entertainment and craving for excitement. Alternatively, com- mental aesthetic quality and perceived crowdedness. J. Res. Pers. 8 (2), 177188.
Flynn, R.J., 1987. Carpenter's Shopping Center Management: Principles and Prac-
munity mall shoppers may be more sensitive to convenience and tices. International Council of Shopping Centers, New York, NY.
crowding. Future research should expand the study to different Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unob-
types of shopping mall environments. servable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res., 3950.
Gilboa, S., Vilnai-Yavetz, I., 2013. Shop until you drop? an exploratory analysis of
mall experiences. Eur. J. Mark. 47 (1), 239259, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/
03090561311285538.
Goodhue, D., Lewis, W., Thompson, R., 2006. January. PLS, small sample size, and
statistical power in MIS research. In System Sciences, 2006. HICSS'06. In:
References Proceedings of the IEEE 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference, vol. 8,
pp. 202b-202b.
Anderson, E.W., Mittal, V., 2000. Strengthening the satisfaction-prot chain. J. Serv. Gomez, M.I., McLaughlin, E.W., Wittink, D.R., 2004. Customer satisfaction and retail
Res. 3 (2), 107120. sales performance: an empirical investigation. J. Retail. 80 (4), 265278.
Anderson, E.W., Sullivan, M.W., 1993. The antecedents and consequences of Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M., 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark.
customer satisfaction for rms. Mark. Sci. 12 (2), 125143. Theory Pract. 19 (2), 139152.
Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R., Grifn, M., 1994. Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and Hayes, A.F., 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process
utilitarian shopping value. J. Consum. Res., 644656. analysis, a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York p. 494.
Babin, B.J., Attaway, J.S., 2000. Atmospheric affect as a tool for creating value and Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R., 2009. The use of partial least squares path
gaining share of customer. J. Bus. Res. 49 (2), 9199. modeling in international marketing. Adv. Int. Mark. 20 (1), 277319.
Babin, B.J., Gonzalez, C., Watts, C., 2007. Does Santa have a great job? Gift shopping Huff, D.L., 1963. A probabilistic analysis of shopping center trade areas. Land Econ.
value and satisfaction. Psychol. Mark. 24 (10), 895917. 39 (1), 8190.
Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., 1989. On the use of structural equation models in experimental International Council of Shopping Centers, 2013. Rolling 12-month Sales Produc-
designs. J. Mark. Res., 271284. tivity for All Non Anchor Tenants in Canadian Malls, Not Seasonally Adjusted.
Bamrung, A., 2003. Mall Shopping Complex to Open Two New Tech Centres in Jackson, V., Stoel, L., Brantley, A., 2011. Mall attributes and shopping value:
Thailand. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, Washington p. 13. differences by gender and generational cohort. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 18 (1),
Bernhardt, K.L., Donthu, N., Kennett, P.A., 2000. A longitudinal analysis of satisfac- 19.
tion and protability. J. Bus. Res. 47 (2), 161171. Jones, M.A., Mothersbaugh, D.L., Beatty, S.E., 2000. Switching barriers and repurch-
Bloch, P.H., Ridgway, N.M., Dawson, S.A., 1994. The shopping mall as consumer ase intentions in services. J. Retail. 76 (2), 259274.
habitat. J. Retail. 70 (1), 2342. Jones, M.A., Reynolds, K.E., Arnold, M.J., 2006. Hedonic and utilitarian shopping
Bodamer, David, 2010 SADI Galleries. Retail Trafc. 20 Oct 2010. value: investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. J. Bus. Res. 59 (9),
Carlson, H.J., 1991. The role of the shopping centre in US retailing. Int. J. Retail 974981.
Distrib. Manag. 19, 6. Kamakura, W.A., et al., 2002. Assessing the service-prot chain. Mark. Sci. 21 (3),
Carpenter, J.M., Balija, V., 2010. Retail format choice in the US consumer electronics 294317.
market. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 38 (4), 258274. Kang, J., Kim, Y.K., 1999. Role of entertainment in cross-shopping and in the
Chain Store Age, 1992. Design Plan Keeps Renovation Costs Down: Grossmont revitalization of regional shopping centers. J. Shopp. Center Res. 6 (2), 4171.
Center Remodels Key Areas to Create Better Atmosphere. Chain Store Age Keiningham, T.L., Aksoy, L., Cooil, B., Andreassen, T.W., 2008. Linking customer
Executive with Shopping Center Age vol. 68 (5), 114. loyalty to growth. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 49 (4), 5157.
Chang, E., Burns, L.D., Francis, S.K., 2004. Gender differences in the dimensional Knapschaeffer, Johanna, 1990. Speciality shops boost sales at penn square mall. J.
structure of apparel shopping satisfaction among Korean consumers: the role of Record.
hedonic shopping value. Clothing Text. Res. J. 22 (4), 185199. Lambert, J., Connolly, J., 2001. After the recession: surprising new patterns of U.S.
Chang, H.H., Fang, W., 2012. The effects of shopping value on retail outcomes: a mall shoppers, spending rises mainly due to older and/or wealthier consumers,
comparison between department stores and hypermarkets. Serv. Ind. J. 32 (14), retail property insight. Int. Counc. Shopp. Centers 18, 2.
22492256. Lee, M.C., Hwan, I.S., 2005. Relationships among service quality, customer satisfac-
Chebat, J.-C., El Hedhli, K., Sirgy, M.J., 2009. How does shopper-based mall equity tion and protability in the Taiwanese banking industry. Int. J. Manag. 22 (4),
generate mall loyalty? A conceptual model and empirical evidence. J. Retail. 635.
Consum. Serv. 16 (1), 5060. LeHew, M.L.A., Fairhurst, A.E., 2000. US shopping mall attributes: an exploratory
Chebat, J.C., Michon, R., 2003. Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers' emotions, investigation of their relationship to retail productivity. Int. J. Retail Distrib.
cognition, and spending: a test of competitive causal theories. J. Bus. Res. 56 (7), Manag. 28 (6), 261279.
529539. Liddane, Lisa, 2013. Brea Mall launches renovation McClatchy - Tribune Business
Chebat, J.-C., Morrin, M., Chebat, D.-R., 2009. Does age attenuate the impact of News 13 Feb.
pleasant ambient scent on consumer response? Environ. Behav. 41 (2), Mgi, Anne, 1995. Customer Satisfaction in a Store Performance Framework. EFI
258267. Research Report. The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Chin, W.W., 2001. PLS-graph user's guide. CT Bauer College of Business, University Mgi, A.W., 2003. Share of wallet in retailing: the effects of customer satisfaction,
of Houston, USA. loyalty cards and shopper characteristics. J. Retail. 79 (2), 97106.
Clapp, J.M., Bardos, K.S., Zhou, T., 2011. Expansions and Contractions of Major US Maxham III, J.G., Netemeyer, R.G., 2002. A longitudinal study of complaining
Shopping Centers. J. Real Estate Finance Econ., 141. customers' evaluations of multiple service failures and recovery efforts. J. Mark.
Cottet, P., Lichtl, M.-C., Plichon, V., 2006. The role of value in services: a study in a 66 (4), 5771.
retail environment. J. Consum. Mark. 23 (4), 219227. Mattila, A.S., Wirtz, J., 2001. Congruency of scent and music as a driver on in-store
Davison, A.C., Hinkley, D.V., Young, G.A., 2003. Recent developments in bootstrap evaluations and behaviour. J. Retail. 77 (2), 273289.
methodology. Stat. Sci. 18 (2), 141157. McGoldrick, P.J., Pieros, C.P., 1998. Atmospherics, pleasure and arousal: the
Dawson, S., Bloch, P.H., Ridgway, N.M., 1990. Shopping motives, emotional states, inuence of response moderators. J. Mark. Manag. 14 (1-3), 173197.
and retail outcomes. J. Retail. 66 (4), 408. Mehrabian, A., Russel, J.A., 1974. An approach to environmental psychology. The
Dennis, C., Murphy, J., Marsland, D., Cockett, T., Patel, T., 2002. Measuring image: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
shopping centre case studies. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res 12 (4), Michon, R., Chebat, J.-C., Turley, L.W., 2005. Mall atmospherics: the interaction effects
355373. of the mall environment on shopping behavior. J. Bus. Res. 58 (5), 576583.
Dennis, Charles, 2005. Objects of Desire: Consumer Behaviour in Shopping Centre Millan, E.S., Howard, E., 2007. Shopping for pleasure? Shopping experiences of
Choices. Palgrave Macmillan, London. Hungarian consumers. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 35 (6), 474487.
618 J.-C. Chebat et al. / Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21 (2014) 610618

Mittal, V., Anderson, E.W., Sayrak, A., Tadikamalla, P., 2005. Dual emphasis and the Turley, L.W., Milliman, R.E., 2000. Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: a
long-term nancial impact of customer satisfaction. Mark. Sci. 24 (4), 544555. review of the experimental evidence. J. Bus. Res. 49 (2), 193211.
Morrin, M., Chebat, J.-C., 2005. Person-place congruency the interactive effects of Underhill, P., 2004. Call of the Mall: The Geography of Shopping by the Author of
shopper style and atmospherics on consumer expenditures. J. Serv. Res. 8 (2), Why We Buy. SimonandSchuster.com.
181191. van den Berg, D., 2003. Fairview Heights, Ill., Mall Owners Unveil Renovation Plans.
Obermiller, Carl, Bitner, Mary Jo, 1984. Store Atmosphere: A Peripheral Cue for Knight Ridder Tribune Business News p. 1.
Product Evaluation, American Psychological Association Annual Conference Vinzi V.E., Trinchera, L., Amato S., 2010. PLS path modelling: from foundations to
Proceedings, Consumer, Psychology Division, David, C. Stewart (Ed.), Washing- recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement.
ton, DC, American Psychological Association. pp. 5253. In: Vinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Partial
Olsen, S.O., Skallerud, K., 2011. Retail attributes' differential effects on utilitarian Least Squares, pp. 4782.
versus hedonic shopping value. J, Consum, Mark, 28 (7), 532539. Wakeeld, K.L., Baker, J., 1998. Excitement at the mall: determinants and effects on
Pan, Y., Zinkhan, G.M., 2006. Determinants of retail patronage: a meta-analytical
shopping response. J. Retail. 74 (4), 515539.
perspective. J. Retail. 82 (3), 229243.
Warrington, P.T., 2002. Customer evaluations of e-shopping: the effects of quality-
Raykov, T., 1997. Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Appl.
value perceptions and e-shopping satisfaction on e-shopping loyalty. Customer
Psychol. Meas. 21 (2), 173184.
evaluations of e-shopping: the effects of quality-value perceptions and e-
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Will, A., 2005. SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta. Hamburg: http://
www.smartpls.de. shopping satisfaction on e-shopping loyalty.
Rintamki, T., Kanto, A., Kuusela, H., Spence, M.T., 2006. Decomposing the value of Werts, C.E., Linn, R.L., Jo
reskog, K.G., 1974. Intraclass reliability estimates: testing
department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions: structural assumptions. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 34 (1), 2533.
evidence from Finland. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 34 (1), 624. Westbrook, R.A., Black, W.C., 1985. A motivation-based shopper typology. J. Retail..
Rucci, A.J., Kirn, S.P., Quinn, R.T., 1998. The employee-customer-prot chain at Sears. Wong, K.C., Norman, G., 1994. The optimal time of renovating a mall. J. Real Estate
Harv. Bus. Rev. 76, 8298. Res. 9 (1), 3347.
Taylor, S.A., Baker, T.L., 1994. An assessment of the relationship between service Yeung, M.C., Ennew, C.T., 2001. Measuring the impact of customer satisfaction on
quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase protability: a sectoral analysis. J. Target. Meas. Anal. Mark. 10 (2), 106116.
intentions. J. Retail. 70 (2), 163178. Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G., Chen, Q., 2010. Reconsidering baron and kenny: myths and
Teller, C., Reutterer, T., 2008. The evolving concept of retail attractiveness: What truths about mediation analysis. J. Consum. Res. 37 (2), 197206.
makes retail agglomerations attractive when customers shop at them? J. Retail.
Consum. Serv. 15 (3), 127143.

S-ar putea să vă placă și