Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1. In this context, an opportunity cost refers to the value of an asset or other input that will be used
in a project. The relevant cost is what the asset or input is actually worth today, not, for example,
what it cost to acquire.
4. Managements discretion to set the firms capital structure is applicable at the firm level. Since
any one particular project could be financed entirely with equity, another project could be
financed with debt, and the firms overall capital structure remains unchanged, financing costs
are not relevant in the analysis of a projects incremental cash flows according to the stand-alone
principle.
6. There are two particularly important considerations. The first is erosion. Will the essentialised
book simply displace copies of the existing book that would have otherwise been sold? This is of
special concern given the lower price. The second consideration is competition. Will other
publishers step in and produce such a product? If so, then any erosion is much less relevant. A
particular concern to book publishers (and producers of a variety of other product types) is that
the publisher only makes money from the sale of new books. Thus, it is important to examine
whether the new book would displace sales of used books (good from the publishers
perspective) or new books (not good). The concern arises any time that there is an active market
for used product.
11. It is true that if average revenue is less than average cost, the firm is losing money. This much of
the statement is therefore correct. At the margin, however, accepting a project with a marginal
revenue in excess of its marginal cost clearly acts to increase operating cash flow. At the margin,
even if a firm is losing money, as long as marginal revenue exceeds marginal cost, the firm will
lose less than it would without the new project.
1. The $7.5 million acquisition cost of the land six years ago is a sunk cost. The $10.3 million
current after-tax value of the land is an opportunity cost if the land is used rather than sold off.
The $24 million cash outlay and $975 000 grading expenses are the initial fixed asset investments
needed to get the project going. Therefore, the proper year zero cash flow to use in evaluating
this project is:
in new sales is relevant. Erosion of luxury caravan sales is also due to the new portable campers;
thus:
The depreciation tax shield is the depreciation times the tax rate, so:
The depreciation tax shield shows us the increase in OCF by being able to expense depreciation.
5. The diminishing value method of depreciation is twice the rate of straight line. A seven-year
asset is 14.286%pa so the DV rate is 28.571%. Remember, to find the amount of depreciation for
any year, you multiply the written down value of the asset times the DV percentage for the year.
The depreciation schedule for this asset is:
6. The asset has a useful life of 8 years and we want to find the book value of the asset after 5 years.
With straight-line depreciation, the depreciation each year will be:
The asset is sold at a loss to book value, so the depreciation tax shield of the loss is recaptured.
This equation will always give the correct sign for a tax inflow (refund) or outflow (payment).
7. To find the book value at the end of four years, we need to find the accumulated depreciation for
the first four years. We use a table as in Problem 5, the DV depreciation rate is 40%. The
depreciation schedule for this asset is:
8. We need to calculate the OCF, so we need an income statement. The lost sales of the current
sound board sold by the company will be a negative since it will lose the sales.
11. The cash outflow at the beginning of the project will increase because of the spending on NWC.
At the end of the project, the company will recover the NWC, so it will be a cash inflow. The
sale of the equipment will result in a cash inflow, but we must also account for the taxes that will
be paid on this sale. So, the cash flows for each year of the project will be:
13. First, we will calculate the annual depreciation of the new equipment. It will be:
Now, we calculate the after-tax salvage value. The after-tax salvage value is the market price
minus (or plus) the taxes on the sale of the equipment, so:
We will use this equation to find the after-tax salvage value since we know the book value is
zero. So, the after-tax salvage value is:
Using the tax shield approach, we find the OCF for the project is:
Now we can find the project NPV. Notice we include the NWC in the initial cash outlay. The
recovery of the NWC occurs in Year 5, along with the after-tax salvage value.
NPV = $735 000 35 000 + $186 900(PVIFA8%,5) + [($73 500 + 35 000) / 1.085]
NPV = $50 080.78
14. First, we will calculate the annual depreciation of the new equipment. It will be:
Now we can find the project IRR. There is an unusual feature that is a part of this project.
Accepting this project means that we will reduce NWC. This reduction in NWC is a cash inflow
at Year 0. This reduction in NWC implies that when the project ends, we will have to increase
NWC. So, at the end of the project, we will have a cash outflow to restore the NWC to its level
before the project. We must also include the after-tax salvage value at the end of the project. The
IRR of the project is:
NPV = 0 = $480 000 + 35 000 + $130 300(PVIFAIRR%,5) + [($21 000 35 000) / (1+IRR)5]
IRR = 13.53%
15. To evaluate the project with a $155 000 cost savings, we need the OCF to compute the NPV.
Using the tax shield approach, the OCF is:
NPV = $480 000 + 35 000 + $116 300(PVIFA10%,5) + [($21 000 35 000) / (1.10)5]
NPV = $12 824.40
We would accept the project if cost savings were $155 000, and reject the project if the cost
savings were $125 000.
21. First, we will calculate the depreciation each year, which will be:
The book value of the equipment at the end of the project is:
The asset is sold at a loss to book value, so this creates a tax refund.
Using the depreciation tax shield approach, the OCF for each year will be:
Now, we have all the necessary information to calculate the project NPV. We need to be careful
with the NWC in this project. Notice the project requires $21 000 of NWC at the beginning, and
$3000 more in NWC each successive year. We will subtract the $21 000 from the initial cash
flow, and subtract $3 000 each year from the OCF to account for this spending. In Year 4, we
will add back the total spent on NWC, which is $30 000. The $3000 spent on NWC capital
during Year 4 is irrelevant. Why? Well, during this year the project required an additional $3000,
but we would get the money back immediately. So, the net cash flow for additional NWC would
be zero. With all this, the equation for the NPV of the project is:
NPV = $545 000 21 000 + ($186 950 3000)/1.11 + ($172 235 3000)/1.112
+ ($161 935 3000)/1.113 + ($154 724 + 30 000 + 78 220)/1.114
NPV = $33 107.89
24. The marketing study and the research and development are both sunk costs and should be
ignored. The initial cost is the equipment plus the net working capital, so:
Initial cost = $28 700 000 + 2 100 000
Initial cost = $30 800 000
Next, we will calculate the sales and variable costs. Since we will lose sales of the expensive
clubs and gain sales of the cheap clubs, these must be accounted for as erosion. The total sales
for the new project will be:
Sales
New clubs $750 72 000 = $5 400 000
Exp. clubs $1100 (8500) = 9 350 000
Cheap clubs $360 11 000 = 3 960 000
$48 610 000
For the variable costs, we must include the units gained or lost from the existing clubs. Note that
the variable costs of the expensive clubs are an inflow. If we are not producing the sets anymore,
we will save these variable costs, which is an inflow. So:
Var. costs
New clubs $360 72 000 = $25 920 000
Exp. clubs $540 (8 500) = 4 590 000
Cheap clubs $125 11 000 = 1 375 000
$22 705 000
OCF = NI + Depreciation
OCF = $5 533 500 + 4 100 000
OCF = $9 633 500