Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Gemma Crowell
Ms. Ann Griffin is a white, tenured teacher at a high school that has a high black student
population. A heated argument that occurred between Ann Griffin and her two black school
administrators, Freddie Watts, principal, and Jimmy Brothers, assistant principal, caused much
controversy, anger, and disappointment among her fellow coworkers at the school. Ms. Griffin
was reported to have said in frustration that she "hated all black folks." Her remark prompted the
principal to recommend a dismissal regarding her inability to control her emotion which posed
doubts as to her classroom behavior management skills and her inability to be an effective
unbiased teacher. The issue in this case is whether the school has sufficient cause to dismiss Ms.
Griffin from her post as a tenured teacher exercising her right to freedom of speech.
Pickering v. Board of Education (1968), will be the first case presented in favor of Ann
Griffin's upholding of her right to freedom of speech. In the case of Pickering v. Board of
Education (1968), "a teacher criticized the school board and superintendent's actions regarding a
school tax levy in a letter to the editor published by the local newspaper. The board dismissed the
teacher. The Supreme Court found the school had violated the teacher's rights to free speech and
overturned Pickering's dismissal" (Underwood & Webb, 2006, p. 49). In regard to Ann Griffin's
case, Pickering v. Board of Education (1968) serves to support Ann Griffin that what she has
The case of Connick v. Myers (1983), will be the second case in favor of Ann Griffin's
right to exercise her freedom of speech. In the Connick v. Myers (1983) case, Sheila Myers was
employed as an Assistant to the New Orleans District Attorney, Harry Connick, Sr. "When
Connick proposed to transfer Myers to prosecute cases in a different section of the criminal
court, she strongly opposed the transfer, expressing her view to several of her supervisors,
including her boss. Shortly thereafter, she prepared a questionnaire that she distributed to others
Teacher's Rights and Responsibilities 3
concerning transfer policy, among others. The distribution of the questionnaire was considered
an act of insubordination. Myers filed suit alleging that she was wrongfully discharged because
she had exercised her constitutionally protected right of free speech. The District Court agreed,
ordered her reinstated, and awarded back pay, damages, and attorney's fees" (Justia, 2015). This
case serves to uphold Ann Griffin's right to exercise her constitutionally protected right to speech
and that school officials cannot just prohibit a teacher for exercising her constitutional right.
The first case in favor of the school administrator's justification for the dismissal of Ann
Griffin is the Martin v. Parrish (1986) case. In this case, "the court upheld the dismissal of an
economics instructor, holding that his use of profane language in a college classroom did not fall
within the scope of First Amendment protection because it did not constitute speech on matters
of public concern, the language was deemed to be a deliberate attack on a "captive audience"
with no academic purpose or justification" (UNC Charlotte, 2016). In regard to the case of Ann
Griffin, the school administrators are justified for their dismissal of Griffin because her remark
did not have an academic purpose and it undermined the authority of the school administrators.
The second case in favor of the school is the Mayer v. Monroe County Community School
(2007). In this case, "Deborah A. Mayer was a first-year teacher in the 11,000-student Monroe
County, Ind., school district in January 2003 when she used an edition of TIME for Kids in a
current-events discussion about the then-impending war. The district court concluded that,
because military intervention in Iraq is an issue of public importance, Mayer had a right to
express her views on the subject, but that the right is qualified in the workplace by the
requirement that expression not disrupt an employer's business unduly. After concluding that the
employer's interests predominate, the district court gave judgment for the defendants" (FindLaw,
Teacher's Rights and Responsibilities 4
2016). In regard to Ann Griffin's case, the school is justified in their dismissal even though the
teacher had exercised her freedom of speech, because her speech has affected her coworker's
relationships and did not serve the best interest of the school.
My decision in this case is in favor of the school administrator, Freddie Watts, and that he
does have sufficient cause to dismiss Ann Griffin under the cases Martin v. Parrish (1986) and
Mayer v. Monroe County Community School (2007). Griffin's exercise of her freedom of speech
not only affected her relationships with her colleagues and students, but it also showed her lack
of respect for those in authority over her at work. Her use of language, though it may have been
uttered out of frustration, shows a lack of control of her emotions and could also reflect what she
could have done in the classroom, thus making her incompetent to manage the behaviors of her
students. So, in this case, the school is justified in the dismissal of the teacher due to Griffin's
questionable classroom behavior management skills and her inability to be an effective unbiased
teacher based from the argument that took place between her and the school administrators.
Teacher's Rights and Responsibilities 5
References
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/461/138/
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1233551.html
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/391/563.html
Underwood, J., & Webb, L. (2006). Teacher's Rights. In School Law for Teachers. New Jersey:
Pearson Education.