Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I
would
like
to
thank
Elizabeth
Mitchell
for
her
time
and
patience
throughout
an
intense
year
of
change
at
the
Melbourne
University
and
former
Victorian
College
of
the
Arts,
James
Sherlock
and
Stephen
Magnusson
for
sharing
their
time
and
knowledge
so
generously
as
mentors,
Geoff
Hughes
for
his
long-term
support,
patience
and
inspiration
throughout
my
time
at
the
VCA/Melbourne
University
and
Elizabeth
Villalta
for
just
being
herself.
iii
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
1
2. Independence
7
3. Chordal
Melodies
15
4. Counterpoint
21
5. Closure
28
6. Time
35
7. Key
signatures
and
open
strings
42
8. Conclusion
48
9. References
50
10. Appendices
Appendix
A
CD
track
list
53
Appendix
B
8-string
guitar
53
Appendix
C
Explanation
of
chord
diagrams
54
iv
1.
INTRODUCTION
Guitarists
should
be
able
to
pick
up
the
guitar
and
play
music
on
it
for
an
hour,
without
a
rhythm
section
or
anything.
Joe
Pass
Solo
jazz
guitar
The
first
thing
to
come
to
mind,
for
anybody
with
knowledge
on
the
subject,
could
range
from
the
well-accepted
style
of
a
player
such
as
Joe
Pass
to
the
more
modern
approach
used
by
someone
such
as
Derek
Bailey.
For
myself
these
3
words
have
represented
the
focus
of
my
personal
practice
throughout
the
later
part
of
my
undergraduate
studies.
With
the
popularity
of
the
guitar
taking
off
through
the
20th
century
and
its
wide
acceptance
as
a
leading
voice
in
the
jazz
context
I
was
surprised
at
what
initially
appeared
to
be
the
small
amount
of
discussion
within
instructional
material
in
the
public
sphere
regarding
this
topic.
This
is
not
to
say
that
good
quality
information
is
not
available,
on
the
contrary,
what
is
out
there
is
largely
insightful
and
usually
written
and
discussed
eloquently
by
the
masters
themselves.
What
I
do
believe
however
is
that
it
is
disproportionate
to
the
popularity
of
the
genre
and
more
importantly
that
it
does
not
cover
every
aspect
of
the
style.
Nevertheless
what
I
have
now
come
to
believe
is
that
these
gaps
within
the
methodology
can
be
filled
by
material
that
exists
in
relation
to
other
musical
practices,
quietly
waiting
to
be
embraced
and
interpreted
for
solo
jazz
guitar.
This
has
led
me
to
the
basis
of
this
paper,
which
is
to
unify
material
relating
to
what
I
believe
are
the
most
important
concepts
concerning
solo
jazz
guitar
under
one
umbrella,
helping
to
give
a
broader
overview
of
what
the
genre
entails.
For
the
majority
of
guitarists
the
notion
of
playing
jazz
unaccompanied
can
be
daunting.
I
personally
have
memories
of
early
days,
struggling
to
get
through
standard
forms
without
a
piano
player
to
outline
harmonic
movement
and
the
very
thought
of
eliminating
the
bass
player
or
drummer
would
have
been
especially
inappropriate
to
my
skill
level.
But
as
technical,
harmonic
and
aural
skills
develop,
the
need
for
a
piano
player
to
hold
down
the
harmony
or
a
drummer
or
bassist
to
outline
the
time
becomes
less
imperative,
on
the
contrary,
it
can
be
enjoyable
to
2
experiment
with
different
combinations
of
instruments.
But
even
then,
it
can
be
difficult
to
acquire
the
preferred
or
necessary
instrumentalists
and
its
important
to
be
able
to
compensate
which
was
one
of
the
main
factors
that
convinced
me
into
thinking
that
learning
to
play
unaccompanied
would
be
a
beneficial
practice.
Obviously,
the
term
solo
jazz
guitar
is
too
vague
a
description
for
a
paper
such
as
this,
so
to
expand
on
my
intention:
this
paper
will
concern
itself
with
compiling
and
analysing
six
techniques
available
to
guitarists
crucial
in
creating
a
sense
of
broad
harmony
and
rhythmic
feel
in
unaccompanied
jazz
tunes
containing
improvisations.
Because
some
of
the
terms
in
the
previous
statement
can
be
interpreted
in
different
ways,
I
will
specify
how
they
will
be
defined
in
this
paper.
Jazz
-
to
mean
from
the
jazz
standard
repertoire,
using
as
a
basis
harmonic
progressions,
forms
and/or
melodic/thematic
material.
Equivalently,
non-jazz
standard
contemporary
compositions
or
improvisations
employing
similar
harmonic,
formal
and/or
melodic
structures
will
also
fall
under
this
category.
Broad
harmony
from
bass
notes
and
root
note
movement
to
higher
upper
extensions
in
vertical
and
horizontal
harmonic
structures
Time
a
strong
sense
of
pulse
to
work
with
or
against
(to
the
point
of
abandonment)
in
order
to
create
rhythmic
interest
and
forward
motion.
Guitar
of
the
common
6-string
variety
in
EADGBe
tuning
for
the
most
part
but
also
including
baritone
guitar,
seven
or
eight
string
varieties
and
other
open
chord
tunings,
restricted
to
playing
techniques
common
to
the
jazz
tradition.
Not
included
will
be
double-necked
guitars
(played
with
different
hands
simultaneously),
effect
pedals
such
as
loopers
or
synths,
midi
controller
guitars,
bass
guitars,
pedal
steel
guitars
and
exotic
guitar-based
instruments
such
as
Pat
Methenys
Picasso
guitar.
3
METHOD
All
the
research
undertaken
for
this
paper
has
had
a
direct
link
to
my
personal
practice
and
development
as
a
performing
musician
allowing
it
to
be
primarily
practice-led-research.
I
have
drawn
on
instructional
material
(in
both
written
and
video
form),
audio
recordings
and
transcriptions,
and
first
hand
discussions
with
leading
practitioners.
To
a
small
extent
I
am
also
relying
on
my
own
personal
experiences
on
the
topic
having
studied
it
in
recent
years.
The
methodological
material
I
have
relied
upon
which
relates
directly
to
solo
jazz
guitar
includes
texts
and
video
such
as
Tuck
Andress
Fingerstyle
Mastery
and
certain
chapters
of
Ralph
Towners
Improvisation
and
Performance
Techniques
for
Classical
and
Acoustic
Guitar
amongst
various
others.
Although
they
were
hugely
insightful
in
terms
of
certain
aspects
relating
to
the
style
(i.e.
independence,
mimicking
walking
bass
lines
etc)
what
they
didnt
encompass
I
compensated
with
textual
materials
from
other
musical
fields.
These
are
not
relating
directly
but
easily
applicable
to
solo
jazz
guitar
and
aid
in
demonstrating
some
of
the
more
important
and
overlooked
aspects
of
the
style.
The
main
sources
of
material
used
however
are
audio
recordings
of
renowned
guitarists
in
the
discipline
such
as
Joe
Pass
and
Australias
own
James
Sherlock
the
old
idiom
still
holds
true
about
the
recordings
being
the
best
teachers.
CHAPTER
OVERVIEW
Most
chapters
follow
a
rough
template
which
include
a
description
of
the
musical
device
at
hand,
references
to
its
use
within
the
wider
musical
spectrum
(i.e.
classical
music,
popular
music
etc),
its
prevalence
within
jazz,
its
importance
to
solo
guitar
and
finally
examples
of
how
it
relates
to
solo
jazz
guitar.
Each
chapter
is
dedicated
specifically
to
one
technique
and
these
are
independence,
chordal
melodies,
counterpoint,
closure,
time,
and
key
signatures
and
open
strings.
4
2.
Independence
considering
this
is
one
of
the
most
crucial
aspects
of
solo
guitar
in
general,
it
is
a
fitting
pace
to
begin
discussion
and
sets
up
the
necessary
understanding
of
technical
requirements
for
subsequent
chapters.
3.
Chordal
Melodies
deals
with
harmonisation
of
melodic
material,
a
topic
thoroughly
discussed
in
methodological
literature
for
chordal
instruments
but
expanded
on
so
as
to
demonstrate
its
importance
as
one
of
the
basic
techniques
for
any
solo
jazz
guitarist.
4.
Counterpoint
only
recently
coming
to
a
high
level
of
exposure
and
interest
in
terms
of
jazz
guitar
within
the
last
few
decades,
this
paradigm
for
harmonic
exploration
and
chordal
construction
is
borrowed
from
the
context
of
classical
music
where
it
has
been
popular
for
centuries
and
explored
within
the
world
of
solo
jazz.
Its
presence
on
jazz
guitar
however,
is
for
the
most
part
not
stringent
in
its
application
as
in
some
classical
music
and
can
be
described
as
a
non-strict
form
of
counterpoint.
5.
Closure
an
exploration
of
a
little
discussed
but
widely
used
technique
that
employs
the
mind
of
the
listener
to
aid
in
establishing
harmony
and
rhythm
(or
groove).
It
is
relevant
to
solo
jazz
playing
on
any
instrument.
6.
Time
of
all
the
devices
available
to
solo
jazz
guitarists
I
found
the
manipulation
of
the
one
discussed
in
this
chapter
to
be
the
least
explored
within
the
directly
related
pedagogical
material.
Its
existence
and
importance
within
the
recordings,
however
could
not
be
overlooked
in
this
discussion.
7.
Key
Signatures
and
Open
strings
this
chapter
is
the
only
one
relating
to
the
specific
physical
layout
of
the
guitar
and
how
to
utilize
its
idiosyncratic
traits
within
the
solo
jazz
guitar
idiom.
5
CONCLUSION
AND
APPENDICES
Following
the
main
chapters
is
a
summarising
chapter
in
which
I
present
how
my
research
could
be
applied
to
modern
practices
in
solo
jazz
guitar
as
a
guide
to
understanding
the
genre
itself
and
as
an
aid
in
perceiving
its
scope
in
the
most
holistic
way.
It
also
continues
on
to
discuss
possibilities
for
further
research.
At
the
conclusion
of
the
paper
there
is
an
appendices
containing
additional
information
and
a
track
listing
to
accompany
the
supplemented
compact
disc
of
audio
samples
given
throughout
the
paper.
6
2.
INDEPENDENCE
THE
SPLIT
BRAIN
One
of
the
most
crucial
elements
in
performing
unaccompanied
jazz
guitar
is
the
ability
to
divide
attention
amongst
various
aspects
of
the
music
for
extended
periods
of
time
(e.g.
melody/rhythm/harmony
or
2
or
more
contrapuntal
voices)
whilst
simultaneously
playing
them
on
one
single
fingerboard.
In
an
ensemble
context
guitarists
can
experience
these
divisions
of
musical
focus
to
a
small
degree
by
acting
out
the
roles
of
both
a
soloist
and
accompanist
during
their
own
solo
improvisations
(unless
there
is
an
accompanist
present)
but
for
the
majority
of
times
these
two
roles
tend
to
be
thought
of
in
an
almost
mutually
exclusive
manner
with
attention
being
placed
on
each
in
turn
as
opposed
to
at
the
same
time.
Due
to
the
layout
and
scope
of
their
instrument,
piano
players
have
a
much
longer
history
of
dividing
their
musical
awareness
between
two
or
more
parts
simultaneously.
Piano
reductions
and
works
for
other
instruments
transcribed
for
solo
piano
(used
extensively
in
the
classical
world)
demonstrate
this
concept
effectively.
The
following
example
(Fig.
1)
is
from
J.S.
Bachs
Contrapunctus
1
BWV1080
from
his
unfinished
final
work
Die
Kunst
der
Fuge1.
In
these
initial
19
bars
we
see
the
entry
of
the
four
voices
involved
within
the
fugue
in
the
way
it
was
originally
written
(SATB
form),
in
addition
to
this
we
also
see
how
the
four
voices
fit
into
the
scope
of
the
piano
(written
underneath
the
bass
voice).
The
solo
piano
transcription
contains
each
part
in
its
entirety
therefore
requiring
the
pianist
to
divide
his/her
attention
in
four
different
ways.
1
BACH,
J.
S.?-1750.
Die
Kunst
der
Fuge,
Contrapunctus
1,
BWV
1080.
Breitkopf
&
Hrtel.
7
Die Kunst der Fuge
Die Kunst der Fuge Johann Sebastian BACH (1685 - 1750)
Johann Sebastian BACH (1685 - 1750)
Contrapunctus I Johann Sebastian BACH (1685
BWV- 1750)
1080
Contrapunctus I BWV 1080
+ # I( ( ( ( ! !! ! ! ' ** ''
+ #$ ! ! )) !!
Contrapunctus BWV 1080
( ( ( ( ! '
+ # ""( $ ( ( (! ' ' '!' !' ' !
! !! !! ! ) ! ' ' ' ' ) ! ' ' ' '* '' '
' ! '
" $ "" # $$ ! ! )!
' ''
' ! ' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ' *' ' ' ' ' *' ' ' ' ' '
#! ' ' * ' '' ' * '' ' ' '
" # $ !" # $ !( ! ) (! ' ' (! ' ' ' (' ' ' ' (' *' ( '
"#$ ( ( ( ( ( ' * ' '((' (
" # $ %( $ (( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ((
,% ## $ ( ( ( ( ( ( (
% $ ,& (# $ (( ( ( ( (! '((' ' !( !' ' !'! ( !' ' ) !' '( '' ' * '' '
, # &#$ ! ( !! ! (! ) ! (' ' ' ' ' !
' ' ' * ' !' ' ' ) !' * ' ' '' ' * '' '
! ( ! ! ()! ' ' ! ' ' ' ' !' ' '
( ( ! !' ' *!'( '' ) !' * ' (' ' * '
& # $ !% !$ !( ! ) (! ' ' (! ' ' ' (' !' ' ' ('
#
%#$ ( ( ( ( ( ' * ' '(' * ' ' (' ' '
( ( ( ( ( ( (
%#$ ( ( ( ( ( ( (
( ( ( ( ( ( (
+ #! ' ' ' # ' ' ! ) ' ' ' * ' ' ' ' ' ! .
8
' ' *' ! ' ' ' ' * '
8+
" #! ' ' ' # ' ' ' ! ) ' ' ' * ' ' ' ' ' ! . ' - ' * '- ! ' ' ' ' ' *'
'
" ' )' ! ' ' ' ! ' . ' ' . ' ' .' ' ' ' ' ) '- ! - ' ' .' ' ' . /
" #'
+ #!
8
' ' ') '# ' ! ' ! ' ) ' ' !' ' * ' ' . ' ' '-' ' . ''- !'.. '- ' ' ' '' '' * '! ! * ' ' . ' '- '''. * ' ) '/
"# ' -( ) '- - ( * ' !' - ! ) '
" "# ( ' ( -( -
" #' ) ' "! # ( ' ' ! ( ' . ' ' . ( ' ' . ' ' '(' ) ' ' ! ( * ' ' .! ' '!. /
% ( ! ! -! !- )!
- ' ' ! ' ' ' ' ! - 0 )'
,% #
"# (# ( ( ! ! !( ! ) ! ( ' ' !/ ( / ' ' ' ' ! ! !0
,& #! '! ' ' # ' '' ! ) ' ' ' * ' ' ' ' '' ! .'
' )' ' ' ! ' . ' ' . ' .' ' ' ' ) ' ''/ ' ! * '/ ! * ' '' .' ' ' '' .' * '
& (#!' ) ' '! '! ' # ' '!'' !' !!) ' '' .'! * ' '- '' .')'!'- '' .' '! .' '' ' ' ! '' ' ! *' '! ' '' ! '' .' ' '- 0'' .' * ' ) '-
% -
, # ( - )' * ! )'
%# ! ( ! ! -( ! - ) ! (' ' / ! / (' ' ' ' !! - 0! -
& #!' '' ( ! ' '
) ' %! # ' # ' ( ''' ' ! ) ( !' .' * ' '! ' .' '( '! '' .' )!!.' ' '(' ) '' '' '!! * ' !('* '' ' ' '' .!!' ' ' ''0.' * '
'
( - - - - )'
!! -
% # + (# * ' ' !! (!
*!
( ( ( !
!' ' ! # ' ' )'! ' ' ' ' ! ! ' '' ' !' ' ! ' * ' ' 0
)' ' ' ''' '
"(
14
'
+ #*' ' !
) ' * ! ' '
' # ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ! ' ' ! ' *' ' !
" # !. '' ' '''' 1 ' ' '( '
14
( ( (
14+ " # !! . ! ' ' ' ' ' ''' '' * 1' ! ( ' ' ' # ' ! (' ! !
('
* ' ' ! (!' ) ' '
#*' ')' ! *! ) ! ' #' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ! ' ' ' ' ' ' *' '
'
" "% # ! ! ' ) '! ' '' ' * '' !' ' ) ' ' '! ' ' # ' !'. ' ' ' !' ' ' ) '' ' * ' ' ) !' ' ' '' ) ' ' '
' ' ( !( ' (
" # ! . , # 1 '' '* ' '' ' ' ' '* ' 1 (
% # ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '' ' ' ' ) ' !
* * ' '
'
! . ' ' ' ' ' ) '! ' ' ) '' ' ' '! ' '
'
" # ! ,& !* '1! . ' ) ' !) !' ' ' * !' ' ' *''' ' ! 1 ' # '' '' (' '# '' '! ' ' ' '' ''('! ! ' ' ' '(' * ' ! * ' (' ) ' '
& # * '! . ' ) ' !! ' * !' ' ' ' '' * ''1 ' '!'# '! ' '( '' '' '' # '' '! ' ' '(!' '! ' ' (!' '! * ' ' !'
'
% # %' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ) !'' ' '' '' '' ' ') '' ' ) ' ! ! . ! . ' '' '' '' '' '') '' ) ' ' * '' ') ') ' ''''('' ) ' '' '
, 1 ' * # '1! ' * ' ' * ' * ' ! '
% ! ' ) !' ' '' ' * '' ' !' ' ) ' ' '! ' ' # ' !! ' ' '' ' !' ' ' ) '' ' * '' ' ) ' ' '!' ) ' '' '
& # * ' ' ) ' !# 1 ' * ' * !'
' '* ' ' ' # ' ' ' ' 'Public ' 'Domain !
. ''' ! ' * ' ' Fig.
1
!. '' ' '''' 1 ( ' ' '( ( (
' Public Domain ! ' '
% ! ' !' ' ) !' ' '' ' * '' ' !' ' ) ' ' '! ' # ' !! . ' ' '' ' !' ' ' ) '' ' * '' ' ) ' ' ' ' ) ' ' '
#
1 ' * ' *' 8
Public Domain
Contrapuntal
techniques
will
be
explored
further
in
chapter
4.
Here
the
example
is
used
purely
to
observe
physical
and
mental
independence.
Because
guitar
is
drastically
more
limiting
in
terms
of
physical
potential
than
the
piano
for
facilitating
this
manner
of
part
independence,
the
possibilities
for
pieces
are
narrower,
although
extreme
levels
of
mastery
within
this
smaller
scope
are
achieved.
The
three
systems
in
Fig.
2
pick
up
from
bar
7
of
Heitor
Villa-Lobos
Etude
no
5
Andantino
for
guitar.
In
them
we
can
see
the
division
of
3
distinct
parts
a
repeating
ostinato
figure,
a
bass
part,
and
a
clear
melodic
voice
on
top2:
Fig.
2
CD
track
1
(0:10)
When
looking
at
a
piece
such
as
this
for
the
first
time,
the
common
understanding
is
that
a
guitarist
would
work
slowly
through
each
bar
one
at
a
time
and
eventually
get
accustomed
to
how
each
part
feels
as
it
works
over
the
others,
resulting
in
a
thorough
understanding
of
the
parts
as
a
whole.
The
added
difficulty
of
this
approach
in
terms
of
jazz
guitar
comes
with
the
improvisation
factor.
2
VILLA-LOBOS,
H.
1952.
Etude
No
5
Andantino.
Villa-Lobos
solo
guitar.
New
York:
Amsco.
9
Charlie
Hunter
is
a
well-known
U.S.
musician
who
has
confronted
this
challenge
in
a
very
unique
way.
Hunter
plays
a
customised
guitar
comprised
of
seven
strings
(a
recent
scale
down
from
eight)
the
top
four
are
guitar
strings
while
the
bottom
three
are
bass
strings3,
this
allows
him
to
act
as
guitar
and
bass
player
simultaneously
while
playing
melodies,
chords
and
bass
lines.
He
is
renowned
not
only
for
his
independence
capabilities
but
also
for
his
ability
to
achieve
a
very
natural
sense
of
feel
when
utilising
them.
In
a
2002
interview
Hunter
describes
guitarists
Joe
Pass
and
Tuck
Andress
as
being
his
biggest
influences
for
what
can
be
done
solo
on
the
guitar4
and
when
asked
about
his
approach
regarding
his
phenomenal
degree
of
independence
Hunters
reply
was:
I
started
listening
to
a
lot
of
organists,
because
they
do
the
left-hand
bass
thing,
foot
pedal
bass,
just
to
get
an
idea.
Like
Big
John
Patton
and
Larry
Young,
Jimmy
Smith,
just
to
kind
of
get
a
foundation
for
what
I
wanted
to
do.
And
a
lot
of
that
stuff
I
just
really,
really
shedded5.
I
shedded
a
lot
of
bass
players,
and
also
shedded
a
lot
of
drum
set,
too.
Its
not
like
my
drum
set
playing
is
great
at
all,
or
that
I
would
even
think
about
playing
in
front
of
people,
but
its
a
great
kind
of
a
cross
reference,
because
that
taught
me
how
counterpoint
works,
how
rhythms
work
together,
and
how
its
supposed
to
feel
when
you
play
one
rhythm
over
another
rhythm.(2002:5)6
Although
Hunters
guitar
is
unique,
similar
instances
of
voice/part
independence
mastery
can
be
seen
on
regular
six
stringed
varieties
throughout
the
world
of
solo
guitar.
In
fact,
Hunters
instrument
can
be
simply
seen
as
a
more
evolved
tool
for
facilitating
independence
between
bass
lines
and
guitar
melodies/comping7,
which
is
something
guitarists
have
been
exploring
for
generations.
3
Refer
to
Appendix
B
for
image
of
Hunters
guitar
4
GOODMAN,
F.
2002.
Puremusic
interview
with
Charlie
Hunter.
Puremusic.com.
5
When
Hunter
refers
to
shedding
he
means
extensive
practicing.
The
saying
derives
from
the
concept
of
wood-shedding
meaning
to
lock
oneself
in
an
outdoor
shed
or
small
room
to
avoid
distractions
in
order
to
achieve
a
high
level
of
practice.
6
GOODMAN,
F.
2002.
Puremusic
interview
with
Charlie
Hunter.
Puremusic.com.
7
To
comp
is
to
provide
a
chordal
accompaniment
for
a
soloist;
the
word
derives
from
accompany
(or
perhaps
compliment).
(1988:240)1988a.
In:
KERNFELD,
B.
(ed.)
The
new
Grove
Dictionary
of
jazz
A
to
K.
New
York:
Macmillan
Press.
10
The
afore
mentioned
inspiration
for
Hunter,
Tuck
Andress,
is
a
prime
case
of
independence
mastery
on
a
regular
6
string
guitar.
Andress
is
widely
known
as
half
of
the
U.S.
husband
and
wife
musical
duo
Tuck
an
Patti
and
for
being
able
to
condense
the
feel
of
an
entire
band
into
his
guitar
playing.
As
J.
Schroeter
stated
in
Fingerstyle
Guitar
Magazine8
when
interviewing
Andress:
The
obvious
thing
you
bring
to
the
party
is
your
emulation
of
other
instruments.
You
really
capture
their
nuances,
as
well.
That
is,
the
way
a
bass
player
might
play
a
particular
phrase,
or
what
the
drummer
might
do
behind
a
given
passage.(1995:9)
To
which
Andress
replies:
Thats
been
a
big
specialty
for
me.
Ive
seen
a
lot
of
people
do
the
solo
guitar
thing,
but
for
me,
having
come
out
of
a
lot
of
bands
where
feel
was
the
whole
thing,
it
had
to
feel
right.
And
it
doesnt
feel
right
if
there
isnt
a
clear
distinction
between
the
parts.
The
grooves
just
not
there.
In
an
ensemble,
there
are
all
these
micro
elements
that
constitute
staccato,
attack,
vibrato,
or
whatever
it
is.
You
want
to
have
independence
of
all
these
things.
So
Ive
worked
a
lot
on
that.(1995:10)
This
independence
can
be
observed
not
only
aurally
but
also
through
transcriptions
such
as
the
one
presented
at
the
conclusion
of
the
article.
The
following
portion
of
the
transcription
represents
the
point
where
Andress
begins
to
combine
the
three
elements
of
melody,
harmony
and
bass
in
his
rendition
of
Michael
Jacksons
popular
song
Man
in
the
Mirror.
The
bass
figure
can
be
seen
to
occur
regularly
on
beats
1
and
2&
(4th
quaver)
with
some
variations
from
bar
17.
The
melody,
which
is
quite
busy,
can
be
seen
situated
on
top.
The
interesting
thing
to
note
is
the
way
in
which
the
chord
harmony
shifts
from
being
coupled
mainly
with
the
bass
figure,
in
the
first
three
bars
of
the
example,
to
both
the
melody
and
bass
in
the
later
five.
In
my
opinion
this
strongly
confirms
Andress
statement
about
having
a
clear
distinction
between
the
parts.
SCHROETER,
J.
1995.
Tuck
Andress
-
Aural
report.
Fingerstyle
Guitar.
8
11
Fig.
3
CD
track
2
(0:27)
When
it
comes
to
solo
jazz
guitar,
mastery
of
voice
independence
can
be
heard
on
recordings
such
as
the
fifth
track
on
Ben
Monders
2005
album
Oceana
-
a
solo
guitar
piece
exemplifying
the
current
interests
of
some
of
the
worlds
top
guitarists
in
contrapuntal
approaches.
With
his
great
proficiency
on
the
instrument,
Monder
takes
the
notion
of
independence
to
extreme
levels,
achieving
great
feats
in
dividing
his
attention
rhythmically
between
different
voices
usually
only
found
in
the
playing
of
drummers
and
pianists.
The
following
is
a
transcription
of
the
first
four
bars
of
the
piece:
Fig.
4
12
It
begins
simply
enough
with
what
can
be
described
as
an
F#
minor
pattern
(a
point
of
interest
is
the
use
of
the
double
C#
notes
on
adjacent
strings)
but
as
soon
as
the
piece
reaches
the
next
bar
Monders
mastery
of
independence
comes
to
light
(note
that
I
have
converted
the
initial
pattern
into
a
5/4
time
signature,
this
is
simply
to
facilitate
in
reading
how
the
bottom
line
interacts
with
the
it):
Fig.
5
CD
track
3
Essentially,
Monder
is
playing
6
over
5,
or
put
differently
24
beats
(represented
by
the
sextuplets)
over
the
original
20
crotchet
beats
(represented
by
the
40
quavers)
and
to
add
to
that,
the
new
voice
is
playing
in
a
different
key,
which
includes
C
and
G
naturals
(tuning
of
the
bottom
2
strings
has
been
altered
to
reach
these
low
notes).
This
recording
entitled
Double
sun9
shows
a
rare
level
of
skill
in
terms
of
independence
for
guitar
and
has
been
a
great
inspiration
for
me
personally
in
regards
to
what
can
be
achieved
with
rhythmic
placement
and
feel.
Within
my
own
practice,
there
are
various
techniques
I
have
found
to
be
beneficial
for
where
I
am
in
my
development
for
building
further
independence.
One
of
these
is
a
practice
technique
demonstrated
to
me
by
Australian
guitarist
James
Sherlock
9
MONDER,
B.
2005.
Oceana.
13
and
deals
with
both
the
harmonic
and
rhythmic
aspects
of
2-voice
independence.
It
involves
the
superimposition
of
one
mode
(i.e.
Ionian,
Dorian,
Melodic
minor
etc)
over
another
with
each
one
restricted
to
either
the
upper
or
lower
three
strings
of
the
guitar,
for
example
an
Ab
Aeolian
scale
played
under
Eb
Ionian
starting
on
Ab:
Fig.
6
These
can
be
started
on
different
degrees
of
the
scales
and
also
move
in
different
directions.
Here
are
2
short
examples:
Fig.
7
To
add
a
degree
of
rhythmic
independence
the
scales
can
be
played
using
combinations
of
differing
rhythmic
figures,
for
example:
Fig.
8
Eventually,
the
goal
is
to
improvise
(in
melodic
and
rhythmic
terms)
using
both
scales
simultaneously.
14
3.
CHORDAL
MELODY
TECHNIQUE
COMBINING
PARTS
A
device
that
is
widely
known
amongst
guitarists
and
other
chordal
instruments
alike
is
that
of
fitting
an
improvised
line
(or
parts
of
a
line)
into
the
harmonic
and
rhythmic
context
of
a
tune
by
means
of
having
it
as
the
top
or
accented
voice
of
chords.
For
this
paper
I
will
refer
to
the
technique
as
the
chordal
melody
technique
(note
-
I
give
it
this
name
for
ease
of
reference
within
this
paper
only
not
to
try
and
establish
a
new
or
reinforce
an
existing
technical
paradigm
for
guitar).
This
is
a
natural
starting
point
for
guitarists
interested
in
going
solo
considering
that
in
ensemble
contexts,
as
jazz
accompanists,
playing
with
a
melodic
chordal
type
of
accompaniment
is
common.
To
illustrate
the
concept
here
is
a
harmonised
example
of
the
first
four
bars
of
Alice
in
Wonderland10:
Fig.
9
Although
this
example
shows
the
harmonisation
of
a
composed
melody
the
same
principle
can
also
be
used
for
an
improvised
one.
There
are
plenty
of
sources
available
regarding
this
practice
commonly
under
headings
such
as
harmonising
a
melody.
Guitarist
Ted
Greene
has
written
a
succession
of
method
books
that
deal
partly
with
this
subject;
the
following
is
an
example
from
Modern
chord
progressions:
10
HILLIARD,
S.
F.
B.
1951.
Alice
in
wonderland.
The
real
book.
Milwakee
WI:
Hal
Leonard.
15
Fig.
10
(Greene
illustrates
chords
in
his
books
primarily
with
these
types
of
guitar
diagrams,
refer
to
Appendix
C
for
how
to
interpret
them.)
In
it
Greene
demonstrates
the
harmonising
of
a
line
starting
on
E
that
runs
diatonically
up
a
C
major
scale
to
D,
down
an
octave
before
returning
to
the
original
note.
Although
this
concept
is
relatively
simple,
he
uses
this
example
to
demonstrate
how
chordal
melodies
tend
to
move
on
guitar
in
a
process
known
as
string
transference11
which
relates
to
moving
from
one
set
of
strings
to
another.
This
type
of
guitar-specific
chordal-melody
material
is
imperative
to
know
for
solo
jazz
guitarist
and
can
be
seen
as
part
of
the
bread
and
butter
for
the
style.
In
his
first
book
Chord
chemistry
Greene
makes
note
of
the
fact
that
often
in
many
cases
a
melody
has
to
be
played
in
the
higher
register
in
order
to
allow
for
harmonising
voices
to
physically
fit
underneath
it
on
the
guitar
neck12.
The
tune
of
a
song
is
often
times
raised
an
octave
in
light
of
this
and
sometimes
changing
the
key
can
be
highly
beneficial,
particularly
to
make
use
of
open
strings.
Pat
Methenys
solo
version
of
Keith
Jarretts
My
song13,
recorded
on
baritone
guitar
but
written
out
below
for
standard
guitar,
is
a
good
example
of
this
and
is
transposed
from
the
key
11
GREENE,
T.
1985.
Modern
Chord
Progressions,
Van
Nuys
CA,
Alfred
Music
Publishing.
12
GREENE,
T.
1981.
Chord
chemistry,
Alfred
music
publishing.
13
METHENY,
P.
2003.
One
quiet
night.
Warner
Brothers.
16
of
C
to
the
key
of
G
in
order
to
make
better
use
of
the
available
lower
register
for
harmonising
the
melody
in
what
can
be
seen
as
a
slightly
more
broken
up
manner.
Here
are
the
first
8
bars
of
the
melody
following
the
introduction:
Fig.
11
CD
track
4
(0:07)
(Note:
CD
track
in
original
key
therefore
notes
transpose
down
a
P4
but
fingering
remains
the
same)
An
example
such
as
this
shows
how
guitarists
must
be
willing
to
shift
melodies
in
order
to
make
full
use
of
the
chordal-melody
technique.
Key
transposition
and
the
use
of
open
strings
will
be
looked
at
in
greater
depth
in
chapter
7.
Another
point
Greene
makes
in
relation
to
chordal
melodies
is
to
do
with
using
a
consistent
number
of
voices
and
although
I
would
not
call
the
examples
he
cites
contrapuntal,
he
does
elude
to
a
more
contrapuntal
approach
and
even
refers
to
practicing
Bach
chorals
as
exercises
for
exploring
and
building
up
a
bank
of
voicings
which
can
be
used
for
constructing
chordal
melodies14.
14
GREENE,
T.
1981.
Chord
chemistry,
Alfred
music
publishing.
17
The
chordal
melody
technique
can
be
heard
on
a
large
number
of
recordings,
for
instance
Wes
Montgomerys
version
of
Ive
grown
accustomed
to
her
face
from
his
album
Full
House
(live)15.
Although
the
track
includes
bass
and
drums,
the
chordal
melodic
concept
can
still
be
heard
on
solo
guitar
during
the
introduction
(shown
in
Fig.
12),
4-bar
bridge
section
and
outro
of
the
tune,
consequently
he
also
plays
using
this
technique
throughout
the
whole
song
even
with
the
accumulation
of
the
other
band
members
into
the
piece.
Fig.
12
CD
track
5
In
my
experience,
because
of
its
simplicity
and
the
evident
benefits
it
has
for
unaccompanied
guitarists,
it
is
always
one
of
the
first
concepts
to
come
up
when
discussing
solo
guitar
with
various
teachers.
During
my
time
studying
under
Australian
based
guitarist
James
Sherlock,
the
importance
of
this
technique
was
established
along
with
appropriate
practice
methods.
In
one
private
lesson
he
pointed
out
that
when
he
is
improvising
a
harmonised
melody
he
simplifies
chord
progressions
to
facilitate
melodic
lines,
for
example
reducing
a
4-bar
I
vi
ii
V
progression
like
CMaj7,
Am7,
Dm7,
G7
into
just
2
bars
of
Cmaj7
and
2
bars
of
G7.
Joe
MONTGOMERY,
W.
1962.
Full
House
(live).
15
18
Pass
describes
a
similar
thought
process
in
his
method
video
Joe
Pass
solo
jazz
guitar.16
Sherlock
explained
that
considering
there
is
no
accompanying
harmonic
instrument
the
solo
guitarist
is
free
to
create
harmonised
melodies
under
whichever
harmonic
context
he/she
chooses
and
describes
instances
where
the
notes
in
the
melody
can
be
treated
as
the
only
harmonic
constant
resulting
in
great
freedom
for
improvising
chords
around
them.
Practice
methods
prescribed
to
me
personally
by
Sherlock
included
harmonising
scales
(similar
to
the
previous
Greene
example
but
exploring
an
infinite
amount
of
variations)
and
harmonising
a
single
note
through
various
chord
changes,
similar
to
an
exercise
from
his
instructional
video
where
he
demonstrates
the
harmonising
of
the
chords
E7(b5#9),
A7(b9),
D7(#9#5)
and
G13(#9)
all
with
a
Bb
note
as
the
top
voice17:
Fig.
13
Another
guitar
method
book
that
I
consider
being
a
valuable
resource
for
guitarists
to
draw
upon
in
order
to
build
up
knowledge
(theoretical,
practical
and
aural)
of
how
to
utilise
chord
voicings
for
harmonising
melodies
is
Barry
Galbraiths
Guitar
comping.
Although
the
book
is
not
concerned
directly
with
solo
guitar
either,
the
chordal
principles
outlined
within
apply
strongly
to
the
chordal
melody
technique.
In
his
introduction
Galbraith
states:
PASS,
J.
1986.
Joe
Pass
-
solo
jazz
guitar.
Hot
Licks.
16
17
Ibid.
19
Upper
voices
of
a
chord
should
form
a
simple
counter
line
rather
than
jumping
aimlessly
about.
However,
at
times
inversions
work
well.
Using
a
common
upper
tone
while
changing
chords
is
effective(1986:2)18.
This
idea
uses
the
same
basic
principle
as
the
chordal
melody
technique
but
goes
about
it
in
the
reverse
order,
placing
more
emphasis
on
the
chords
rather
than
the
melodic
idea.
For
this
reason
I
found
Galbraiths
book
to
be
inadvertently
useful
in
my
own
practice
with
relation
to
solo
jazz
guitar.
Personally,
as
I
explored
this
chordal
melody
technique
I
found
its
greatest
advantage
was
that
it
dealt
with
melody
and
harmony
at
the
same
time,
even
bass
movement
could
be
addressed
depending
on
the
complexity
of
the
melody
and
technical
demand
of
the
voicings.
Conversely
I
found
that
an
improvised
melody
could
be
compromised
when
trying
to
fit
chords
underneath
each
note,
though
in
reality
not
all
notes
of
the
melody
have
to
be
harmonised
(as
in
the
Montgomery
example)
and
in
many
cases
where
there
are
many
notes
and
the
tempo
is
reaching
a
fast
pace
it
becomes
too
cumbersome
to
apply
a
chord
to
each.
A
players
sense
of
musicality
ought
to
be
the
judge
as
to
which
melody
notes
should
be
harmonised
in
any
given
phrase.
GALBRAITH,
B.
1986.
Jazz
guitar
study
series:
guitar
comping,
New
Albany,
IM,
Jamey
Aebersold.
18
20
4.
COUNTERPOINT
KEEPING
THE
VOICES
ALIVE
Looking
at
the
way
jazz
guitar
has
evolved
from
its
early
beginnings
in
a
percussive/chordal
role
to
its
modern
day
way
of
speaking,
one
can
see
a
trend
from
using
primarily
a
vertical
harmonic
paradigm
towards
accepting
and
amalgamating
contrapuntal
ways
of
thinking.
For
a
long
time
guitarists
accepted
the
responsibility
of
wearing
two
hats,
acting
as
a
chordal
accompaniment
instrument
while
supporting
soloists
and
at
other
times
being
the
lead
solo
voice19.
Combining
the
two
more
often
than
not
involved
giving
preference
to
the
lead
solo
line
with
vertical
chord
structures
spread
intermittently
in
the
gaps.
For
example,
in
Peter
Leitchs
solo
through
Chick
Coreas
Tones
for
Joans
bones
the
solo
voice
is
heard
to
be
complimented
by
chordal
stabs
at
different
intervals,
such
as
in
the
three
bars
between
the
end
of
the
line
beginning
at
the
Ebmaj7
turnaround
and
the
start
the
next
over
the
F7
chord
in
the
following
transcription20:
Fig.
14
CD
track
6
(0:08)
Similarly
in
James
Mullers
up
tempo
rendition
of
the
Kern/Hammerstein
standard
All
the
things
you
are
Muller
drives
his
solo
strongly
with
lengthy
single
note
lines
19
GOODRICK,
M.
1987.
The
advancing
guitarist,
Third
Earth.
20
LEITCH,
P.
1991.
Trio/Quartet
'91.
21
interspersed
by
moments
of
chordal
playing
as
can
be
seen
at
the
0:48
mark
in
Fig.
15
when
moving
from
Abmaj7
through
to
Gmaj7
two
bars
later21.
Fig.
15
CD
track
7
(0:08)
(Note:
disregard
0:45
and
0:48
in
the
transcription
as
this
refers
to
the
time
on
the
original
CD)
The
other
common
technique
for
the
combining
of
harmony
and
melody
is
the
chordal
melody
technique
referred
to
in
the
previous
chapter.
This
was
a
popular
technique
for
the
late
Wes
Montgomery
who
would
often
begin
his
solos
with
single
note
lines
before
moving
onto
octaves
and/or
chordal
melodies.
However,
a
more
contrapuntal
approach
to
melodies
and
harmony
on
jazz
guitar
appears
to
be
a
relatively
recent
way
of
thinking.
Classical
guitar
players
on
the
other
hand
have
employed
the
extensive
use
of
counterpoint
for
a
longer
time
with
countless
pieces
and
exercises
available
for
exploration
on
the
matter.
An
example
to
demonstrate
one
such
piece
is
Fernando
Sors
study
in
C
Opus
6,
no.
8:
MULLER,
J.
2006.
Kaboom.
21
22
Fig.
16
CD
track
8
But
even
with
an
excess
of
material
such
as
this
devoted
to
counterpoint
for
guitar
in
the
classical
world,
in
jazz
its
exploration
has
taken
significantly
longer
to
unfold.
I
personally
tend
to
think
this
is
because
of
the
initial
role
guitar
took
in
early
jazz
before
the
invention
of
amplification,
resulting
in
more
emphasis
put
onto
thinking
in
terms
of
easy-to-grab,
block-type
chord
voicings
for
the
sake
of
an
immediate
and
loud-as-possible
rhythmic
presence.
Further
to
this
I
contend
that
it
has
led
to
a
re-
inventing
of
the
wheel
in
terms
of
counterpoint
and
jazz
guitar,
with
a
profound
23
importance
being
placed
on
the
subject
only
in
recent
times
(35
years
or
so
from
anecdotal
evidence).
Nevertheless,
interest
has
risen
with
texts
such
as
The
advancing
guitarist
helping
to
pave
the
way
for
a
contrapuntal
approach
to
jazz
guitar
with
author
M.
Goodrick
making
statements
such
as:
Counterpoint
(or
the
study
of
intervals)
is
one
of
the
most
neglected
and
important
aspects
of
the
guitar.(1987:18)
He
supplements
this
and
other
similar
views
with
ideas
for
exercises
aiding
in
horizontal
playing
of
voices
with
intent
to
incite
contrapuntal
thinking
for
the
jazz
guitarist.
These
ideas
include
playing
intervals
on
adjacent
and
non-adjacent
string
sets
and
even
the
possibility
of
playing
contrapuntally
solely
in
open
position22.
All
of
his
practice
suggestions
are
based
around
the
four
types
of
contrapuntal
motion
shown
in
Fig.
17:
Fig.
17
A
strong
advocate
for
Goodricks
ideas
concerning
horizontal
movement
and
counterpoint
on
guitar
is
Australias
Stephen
Magnusson.
Aside
from
personally
talking
to
Stephen
about
the
large
impact
the
book
has
had
on
him,
his
playing
is
a
22
GOODRICK,
M.
1987.
The
advancing
guitarist,
Third
Earth.
24
strong
testament
to
the
ideas
Goodrick
argues
for
and
can
be
heard
on
a
variety
of
his
recordings,
such
as
the
bass-less
trio
album
Healing
songs23
for
example.
Magnussons
ability
to
vary
his
articulations
between
different
voices
and/or
phrases
is
a
tremendous
tool
for
distinguishing
them
and
places
him
alongside
other
renowned
guitarists
such
as
John
Scofield
and
Bill
Frisell
who
employ
similar
techniques.
It
was
while
receiving
lessons
from
Stephen
that
my
personal
interest
regarding
contrapuntal
melodic
and
harmonic
techniques
really
started
to
unravel
itself
and
I
have
consequently
implemented
certain
aspects
of
it
into
my
own
practice
and
playing
style.
These
practices
are
along
the
vein
of
the
ones
established
by
Goodrick
in
his
book,
only
with
solo
jazz
guitar
in
mind.
One
example
would
be
using
the
form
of
a
standard
and
improvising
in
a
single-note
linear
style
concentrating
on
alternating
short
phrases
which
are
voiced
on
different
parts
of
the
fingerboard
(i.e.
top
3
strings
versus
lower
3
strings),
giving
the
feel
of
two
separate
parts
alternating
one
phrase
at
a
time.
Then
slowly
overlapping
the
phrases
so
they
eventually
occur
simultaneously.
At
first
I
found
this
type
of
playing
on
guitar
foreign
and
somewhat
difficult
considering
the
physical
limitations
of
the
instrument
and
the
independence
involved,
particularly
with
an
increased
number
of
voices,
but
I
have
come
to
personally
believe
this
is
where
thorough
horizontal
fingerboard
knowledge,
technique
and
harmonic
understanding
come
into
play.
It
doesnt
hurt
to
blur
the
line
between
oneself
as
an
accompanist
and
soloist
either,
as
Goodrick
states:
Counterpoint
can
be
viewed
as
the
study
of
intervals
that
helps
to
dissolve
rigid
ways
of
thinking
about
melody
as
one
thing
and
harmony
as
another(Goodrick,
1987).
In
terms
of
unaccompanied
jazz
guitar
pedagogy,
I
found
it
difficult
to
unearth
any
textual
resources
that
related
directly
to
counterpoint,
not
to
say
there
is
none
out
there
only
that
I
failed
to
discover
any
in
my
research,
therefore
I
will
endeavour
to
show
its
relevance
in
the
discipline
with
a
transcribed
audio
sample.
BALL
MAGNUSSON
BERESOVSKY,
E.
S.
S.????
Healing
songs.
23
25
This
short
transcription
comes
from
Israeli
born
guitarist
Gilad
Hekselman
and
in
these
initial
bars
to
his
freely
stated
introduction
of
his
version
of
the
standard
I
fall
in
love
too
easily24
a
clear
distinction
of
2
voices
can
be
seen
and
heard:
Fig.
18
CD
track
9
Although
the
phrases
alternate,
Hekselman
uses
the
technique
of
allowing
the
last
note
of
each
one
to
bleed
into
the
next.
Added
to
this
are
register
and
timbral
differences,
all
in
all
creating
a
true
sense
of
contrapuntal
movement.
It
is
of
interest
to
note
that
at
the
end
of
bar
4
the
two
voices
link
up,
with
the
higher
one
picking
up
from
the
note
where
the
lower
left
off
but
because
they
have
already
been
established
as
separate
in
the
initial
bars
they
maintain
their
sense
of
separation.
Similar
instances
of
implying
separate
voices
have
been
heard
clearly
for
centuries
going
back
to
the
baroque
period
and
implied
counterpoint.
A
method
for
approaching
this
type
of
single-note
counterpoint
specifically
for
jazz
guitar
is
given
by
Jon
Damian
in
his
book
The
guitarists
guide
to
composing
and
improvising.
In
Fig.
19
one
can
see
his
method
for
condensing
two
contrapuntal
lines
into
a
singular
line25:
24
HEKSELMAN,
G.
2006.
Split
life.
New
York:
Smalls
Records.
DAMIAN,
J.
2001.
The
guitarist's
guide
to
composing
and
improvising,
Boston,
MA,
Berklee.
25
26
Fig.
19
Considering
the
melodies
are
an
example
of
improvised
lines,
strict
adherence
to
the
original
rhythm
is
not
important,
what
is
important
is
maintaining
the
feel
of
two
parts
working
against
each
other.
Damian
then
goes
on
to
explain
how
the
notes
making
up
the
improvised
lines
could
be
derived
from
the
chords
they
will
be
played
over.
In
this
un-harmonised
style,
core
notes
from
the
chords
make
up
the
strongest
parts
of
the
lines,
e.g.
from
the
chord
Cm7
the
notes
C,
Eb,
G
and
Bb
would
be
the
strongest
to
use.
The
biggest
strength
that
I
see
in
working
to
obtain
a
grasp
over
this
type
of
technique
for
a
solo
jazz
guitarist
is
that
it
offers
him/her
quite
a
modern
voice
away
from
clichs
that
have
come
to
be
associated
with
the
style
over
the
years.
I
believe
that
thinking
in
separate
voices
also
benefits
greatly
to
the
notion
of
including
bass
lines
on
guitar
when
playing
solo
and
that
this
type
of
practice
leads
to
better
thought-out
bass
lines
in
general
(from
my
personal
practice
experience).
27
5.
CLOSURE
-
SMOKE
AND
MIRRORS
Filling
in
the
gaps
is
something
the
human
brain
has
evolved
to
do
quite
well.
The
phenomenon
is
known
as
closure26
within
the
Gestalt
principles
of
perception.
An
example
of
how
our
brains
do
this
is
illustrated
in
the
following
optical
illusion:
This
image
is
originally
from
Dr
Haseltines
online
blog
at
longfusebigbang.com
and
his
explanation
of
how
it
works
is
as
followed:
Your
brain
fills
in
the
gaps
in
the
rectangle
between
four
corners,
creating
completed
lines
where
there
are
no
lines
at
all.
Your
brain
engages
in
this
bit
of
creative
fiction
to
help
you
make
sense
of
what
youre
seeing(2010)27.
Although
the
term
closure
was
originally
coined
in
terms
of
visual
perception,
for
this
chapter
I
am
going
to
hijack
it
for
use
in
an
audio/musical
context.
My
reason
for
this
being
that
I
feel
it
describes
adequately
the
phenomenon
at
the
heart
of
this
chapter
in
both
harmonic
and
rhythmic
terms
but
also
steers
away
from
related
titles
which
may
carry
other
connotations
and
lead
to
misunderstandings.
Riecke
et
al.s
article
on
auditory
illusion
and
how
the
brain
fills
in
the
gaps
when
sound
is
fragmented
describes
the
process
well
in
regards
to
audio-sensory
perception:
26
Closure
a
paradigm
for
the
study
of
visual
perception
established
in
the
1920s.
The
principle
can
be
described
as
incomplete
figures
will
be
perceived
as
closed
in
order
to
obtain
their
familiar
meaning
(2006.
Gestalt
Psychology.
In:
DAVEY,
G.
(ed.)
Encyclopaedic
dictionary
of
psychology.
London:
Hodder
Arnold.)
27
HASELTINE,
D.
E.
2010.
Optical
illusions
can
you
help
predict
the
future?
[Online].
Hyperion.
Available:
http://longfusebigbang.com/blog/optical_illusions_can_help_you_predict_the_future/
[Accessed
03/09/10
2010].
28
It
is
quite
common
for
us
to
"hear"
sounds
that
aren't
really
there:
human
hearing
is
a
constructive
process.
The
brain
has
the
ability
to
take
auditory
fragments
and
generate
an
overall
"image"
of
the
sound.
It
is
like
assembling
a
jigsaw
puzzle
with
some
of
the
pieces
missing
but
still
having
a
good
enough
impression
of
the
overall
picture(2009:555)28.
Before
explaining
how
this
phenomenon
can
be
used
as
a
tool
for
solo
guitar
it
is
important
to
be
aware
that
our
brains
perform
this
on
a
daily
basis
and
also
to
understand
the
way
it
is
made
effective
in
a
general
musical
context.
To
demonstrate
this,
take
the
following
example;
in
Colombian
group
Los
Tupamaros
soca29
hit
Enamorao30,
the
opening
solo
piano
riff
is:
Fig.
20
CD
track
10
This
riff
is
restated
again
at
0:57
minutes,
but
unlike
the
first
time
it
is
presented
it
takes
place
after
a
verse
that
has
established
a
strong
danceable
rhythm.
Because
of
this,
even
though
the
riff
is
again
played
unaccompanied,
the
groove
persists
in
the
listeners
mind
enabling
the
rhythm
to
be
felt
(and
danced)
straight
through.
28
LARS
RIECKE,
FABRIZIO
ESPOSITO,
MILENE
BONT,
ELIA
FORMISANO.
2009.
Hearing
Illusory
Sounds
in
Noise:
The
Timing
of
Sensory-Perceptual
Transformations
in
Auditory
Cortex.
Neuron,
64,
550-561.
29
Soca
is
an
abbreviation
for
soul
calypso.
30
TUPAMAROS,
L.
2008.
20
anos
de
exitos.
Discos
Fuentes.
29
Fig.
21
Fig.
21
shows
the
different
aspects
of
the
rhythm
section
that
contribute
to
establishing
the
rhythmic
groove
of
the
piece.
In
my
opinion
it
is
the
rhythms
of
the
bass
figure,
cowbell
and
timbales
that
embed
themselves
the
strongest
in
the
minds
internal
ear
and
allow
for
a
perceived
groove
to
be
felt
even
in
the
absence
of
actual
input
into
the
sensory
ear.
The
previous
example
illustrated
closure
in
relation
to
rhythm
and
how
it
can
be
implied
for
a
period
of
time
but
it
can
also
occur
in
relation
to
harmony.
A
very
common
example
in
the
jazz
world
is
what
is
known
as
trading31
with
a
drummer.
An
example
(amongst
possibly
tens
of
thousands)
of
this
can
be
heard
on
the
recording
of
Wes
Montgomerys
Four
on
six,
the
first
track
on
guitarist
Pat
Martinos
album
Remember
a
tribute
to
Wes
Montgomery32.
The
harmonic
progression
for
the
solo
section
of
the
piece
can
be
seen
in
the
following
chord
chart:
Gm7
%
%
%
Cm7
F7
Bbm7
Eb7
Am7
D7
Ebm7
Ab7
Gm7
%
%
Cm7
F7
Bbmaj7
Gm7
Eb7
D7
Gm7
Am7(b5)
D7
Fig.
22
31
To
trade:
In
jazz
to
divide
a
chorus
between
or
among
solo
players,
so
that
each
takes
a
phrase
in
turn.
The
length
of
the
phrases
traded
is
usually
four
bars,
but
eight-bar
and
two-bar
phrases
and
even
single
bars
are
also
treated
in
this
way;
the
players
are
said
to
trade
fours
(eights,
twos,
ones).
(1988b.
In:
KERNFELD,
B.
(ed.)
The
New
Grove
Dictionary
of
Jazz.
London:
Macmillan.)
32
MARTINO,
P.
2006.
Remember
-
a
tribute
to
Wes
Montgomery.
Blue
Note.
30
At
4:35
minutes
on
the
original
recording
(immediately
after
the
piano
solo)
Martino
and
drummer
Scott
Allan
Robinson
begin
3
choruses33
of
8-bar
trading
(CD
track
11
(0:16)).
The
entire
band
plays
over
each
of
Martinos
8-bar
phrases
clearly
outlining
the
chord
changes
which,
because
the
form
is
an
even
16
bars,
turns
out
to
be
the
first
8
bars
each
time.
But
when
it
comes
to
Robinsons
8-bar
solos
the
rest
of
the
band
tacets34
and
although
the
average
person
with
little
understanding
of
jazz
harmony
may
struggle
to
keep
the
chord
progression
moving
in
their
heads,
people
with
a
more
developed
aural
sense
of
harmony
(such
as
musicians
or
long-time
jazz
listeners)
do
achieve
this.
This
is
due
to
the
fact
that
the
chord
progression
has
been
established
for
the
listener
through
numerous
form35
repetitions
during
previous
solos
by
the
time
it
reaches
the
trading.
Internally
hearing
the
harmony
while
the
drummer
solos
is
no
small
feat
but
because
the
passages
of
8-bar
solo
drumming
are
divided
by
Martino
and
the
rest
of
the
band
the
listener
accepts
this
as
a
mode
of
reinforcement
and
the
form
can
feel
to
move
on
uninterrupted,
as
opposed
to
having
blocks
of
solo
drums
that
halt
the
songs
harmonic
progression.
The
same
can
be
achieved
with
an
unaccompanied
guitar
piece.
Guitarist
Ralph
Towner
supports
this
view
and
states
(in
terms
of
solo
jazz
guitar)
that:
different
parts,
when
they
become
silent,
linger
in
the
listener's
and
player's
memories.
When
you
overlap
two
parts,
the
attention
swing
to
the
new
part
is
occupied
momentarily
by
the
old
part.
When
the
actual
silence
takes
place
in
the
old
part,
it
is
not
as
consciously
abrupt
this
way.
For
example,
if
the
accompaniment
has
a
specifically
motor
like
personality,
it
can
be
implied
to
continue
unabated
if
you
maintain
the
same
qualities
upon
returning
to
it.(1985:37)36
33
A
chorus
can
be
defined
as
In
general
usage
the
refrain
of
a
song
or
hymn,
that
section
which
is
repeated,
always
with
the
same
tune
and
text,
after
each
verse;
for
the
use
of
harmonic
and
metric
structures
of
song
refrains
as
the
basis
of
jazz
pieces
(1988b.
In:
KERNFELD,
B.
(ed.)
The
New
Grove
Dictionary
of
Jazz.
London:
Macmillan.)
34
To
Tacet
means
to
remain
silent
35
In
this
jazz
context
the
term
form
and
chorus
are
interchangeable.
36
TOWNER,
R.
1985.
Improvisation
and
Performance
Techniques
for
Classical
and
Acoustic
Guitar,
Wayne
N.J.,
21st
Century
Music
Productions.
31
An
example
of
this
principle
of
closure
in
solo
guitar
can
be
heard
on
James
Sherlocks
recording
of
Domestic
arts
and
sciences37.
The
5/4
swing
tune
begins
by
establishing
a
groove,
which
can
be
seen
within
the
first
4
bars,
but
then
the
bass
and
chord
patterns
making
up
the
groove
change
in
order
to
compensate
for
the
melody
in
the
next
4
bars.
In
this
example
I
have
excluded
the
melody
in
order
to
allow
for
a
better
view
of
what
is
taking
place
in
the
underlying
groove.
Fig.
23
CD
track
12
Immediately
on
first
glance
the
parts
look
noticeably
different.
The
main
change
being
that
the
duration
of
many
of
the
notes
has
shortened.
This
makes
sense
considering
the
fact
that
inserting
a
melody
would
create
gaps
in
the
underlying
support
structure.
Secondly
some
of
the
rhythms
have
shifted
or
disappeared
all
together,
this
can
be
seen
to
occur
in
every
bar
and
is
also
to
be
expected
when
adding
a
melody.
Nevertheless
the
song
maintains
its
drive
and
pace
thanks
to
our
brains
ability
to
fill
in
the
gaps
aided
by
moments
of
reinforcement
such
as
the
triplet
figure
found
in
the
bass
part
of
bar
7.
In
my
opinion,
the
ability
to
control
this
audio
illusion
is
one
of
the
most
important
and
least
discussed
aspects
of
solo
jazz
guitar.
Although
it
can
be
easily
arranged
and
incorporated
into
the
melody
of
a
tune
I
have
personally
found
it
a
challenging
37
SHERLOCK,
J.
2010.
Solo.
Pinnacles
Music.
32
concept
to
grapple
with
while
improvising
simply
because
it
adds
a
further
dimension
to
the
way
ones
mind
has
to
mould
the
music
and
develop
the
improvisation.
However
through
trial
and
error
I
have
found
a
useful
method
for
practicing
this
concept,
which
has
turned
out
to
be
quite
similar
to
an
exercise
prescribed
by
Ralph
Towner.
It
involves
mapping
out
a
chart
(of
12
bars
for
example)
with
certain
areas
roughly
dedicated
to
playing
an
accompanist-type
role
and
laying
down
a
groove
while
having
other
areas
set
aside
for
unrestricted
improvisation
of
melodic
lines.
The
two
areas
are
made
to
overlap
slightly.
Towners
exercise
is
a
slight
expansion
of
this
by
having
the
accompanist-type
section
divided
into
bass
and
chords
accompaniment.
Towners
example
is
demonstrated
below
in
Fig.
2438:
Fig.
24
This
type
of
mapped
out
chart
can
be
superimposed
over
the
form
of
any
tune
starting
at
any
point
with
the
time
signature
being
altered
as
required.
It
can
also
be
lengthened,
shortened,
played
in
double/half
time
or
be
split
up
to
achieve
numerous
permutations,
and
when
all
possibilities
have
been
exhausted,
countless
others
can
be
written
resulting
in
an
infinite
amount
of
variations.
38
TOWNER,
R.
1985.
Improvisation
and
Performance
Techniques
for
Classical
and
Acoustic
Guitar,
Wayne
N.J.,
21st
Century
Music
Productions.
33
Towners
separation
of
bass
and
chord
accompaniment
is
not
unexpected
considering
the
importance
that
solo
jazz
guitarists
have
put
on
mimicking
bass
lines
within
the
style.
In
fact,
in
this
music,
the
concept
of
closure
lends
itself
well
to
bass
line
parts
because
of
their
generally
pattern-based
rhythms
which
our
brains
can
latch
on
to
whether
they
be
4
to
the
bar
walking
lines
or
more
syncopated
ones
like
the
one
seen
in
the
previous
Sherlock
example.
34
6.
TIME
THE
NOT
SO
CONSTANT
a
single
second
ticking
by,
all
the
clocks
in
this
house
suddenly
wrong,
&
another
hour
lost.39
This
is
taken
from
the
final
verse
in
Tempo
Rubato
by
Aleda
Shirley
and
is
a
poetic
description
of
how,
for
all
of
us,
time
can
feel
to
warp
itself
from
being
a
measurable
constant
into
a
more
fluid
thing.
The
musical
equivalent
of
this
real
time
that
we
experience
in
everyday
life
is
what
we,
funnily
enough,
refer
to
as
time
and
is
made
up
by
the
variables
of
meter,
rhythm
and
tempo40
-
which
can
also
be
made
to
appear
to
be
warped.
The
topic
of
time
in
music
is
incredibly
massive
and
far
beyond
the
scope
of
this
paper
to
cover
in
any
great
detail
but
my
intention
is
to
recognise
its
importance
as
a
significant
tool
for
solo
jazz
guitar
with
the
use
of
various
examples.
Despite
being
such
an
immensely
vital
factor
in
music,
I
am
not
surprised
that
mastery
of
the
manipulation
of
time
is
not
discussed
in
terms
of
solo
jazz
guitar
considering
its
gross
underrepresentation
in
jazz
related
texts
as
a
whole.
Obtaining
a
high
level
of
harmonic
mastery
for
improvisation
is
extremely
important
but
in
general,
jazz
musicians
tend
to
focus
primarily
on
this
to
the
detriment
of
their
mastery
of
time.
Achieving
a
comfortable
and
adequate
feel
within
music
is
usually
the
extent
to
which
the
majority
of
jazz
musicians
explore
this
concept
(in
my
opinion).
The
true
jazz
masters,
however,
appear
to
be
the
exception
to
this,
which
raises
an
interesting
point
between
the
correlation
of
time
mastery
and
mastery
of
jazz
as
a
whole.
The
3
forms
of
time-manipulation
I
will
be
discussing
are
free-time
playing,
tempo
shifting
(ritardando/accelerando)
and
the
use
of
rubato.
In
the
jazz
world
there
seems
to
be
some
overlap
of
these
3
principles
with
the
terms
being
thrown
around
39
SHIRLEY,
A.
2006.
Tempo
rubato.
The
North
American
Review,
291,
42.
40
BARRA,
D.
1983.
The
dynamic
performance
-
A
performer's
guide
to
musical
expression
and
iterpretation,
Sydney,
Prentice
Hall
(of
Australia).
35
somewhat
loosely.
In
the
classical
world
on
the
other
hand,
these
terms
have
existed
with
quite
some
contention
as
to
their
strict
definitions.
To
avoid
getting
bogged
down
in
definitions
I
will
use
sources
that
describe
most
simply
the
concepts
I
wish
to
get
across.
In
terms
of
free
time
I
mean
free
from
any
pulse
or
rhythmic
patterns,
it
can
be
for
extended
periods
such
as
an
improvisation
cycling
through
the
chord
progression
of
a
tune
with
no
meter,
or
as
a
entity
residing
within
a
tune
itself
(i.e.
a
cadenza
type
line
coming
out
of
a
dominant
chord
and
into
a
tonic
chord).
Tempo
shifting
I
describe
as
an
increase
or
decrease
of
tempo,
this
can
include
ritardandos
and
accelerandos
but
also
combinations
of
the
two
in
close
succession
resulting
in
a
fluid
like
pulse.
Rubato
I
define
by
Donald
Barras
terms
from
his
book
The
Dynamic
Performance,
which
states:
This
technique,
which
is
based
on
subtle
readjustments
in
the
timing
of
the
rhythmic
patterns
directly
reinforces
the
amount
of
tension
that
is
generated
from
within
the
musical
impulse.
Most
musical
resolutions
tend
to
coincide
with
the
strong
beats
of
the
metric
structure.
A
slight
retard
before
the
arrival
of
these
metric
pulses
tends
to
increase
the
level
of
musical
tension
and
so
produces
a
stronger
resolution
when
the
release
finally
does
occur.
(1983:100)41
The
important
things
I
wish
to
outline
are
that
rubato
and
tempo-shifting
techniques
differ
in
that
one
works
against
a
pulse
and
the
other
is
the
pulse
shifting,
also
that
these
forces
can
work
simultaneously.
While
free-playing
cannot
work
simultaneously
to
these
2
techniques,
it
can
appear
alongside,
take
for
example
the
opening
of
Geoff
Hughes
Snoring
waters
from
the
Allan
Browne
Quintets
album
Cyclosporin42:
41
Ibid.
42
ALLAN-BROWNE-QUINTET
2004.
Cyclosporin.
Melbourne:
Jazz
head.
36
Fig.
25
CD
track
13
Although
this
introduction
may
feel
free,
when
analysed,
saxophonist
David
Rexs
line
can
be
felt
to
have
a
pulse
albeit
that
its
shifting,
irregular
and
understated
due
to
his
attack.
True
free-time
is
felt
at
the
fermatas
particularly
at
the
second
one
where
Rex
plays
a
flurry
of
ornamental
notes
(not
illustrated
here,
refer
to
track
13
on
accompanying
CD)
complimented
by
the
rest
of
the
band.
This
example
is
interesting
because
the
group
explores
this
time
manipulation
as
a
whole,
similar
to
the
way
an
orchestra
might,
with
Rexs
phrasing
acting
as
conductor
and
allows
for
melodic
strong
points
to
dock
periodically
with
chordal
landmarks.
In
terms
of
solo
playing,
the
combination
of
rubato
playing
with
tempo-shifting
can
be
heard
on
pianist
Keith
Jarretts
introduction
to
My
funny
valentine
from
his
1988
trio
album
Still
live43.
A
pulse
is
clearly
discernable
as
depicted
in
the
transcription
of
the
initial
12
bars44:
JARRET,
K.
1988.
Still
live.
ECM.
43
44
BRUCHEZ,
O.
1999-2010.
Keithjarret.org
[Online].
Word
press.
Available:
http://www.keithjarrett.org/transcriptions/
[Accessed
2010].
37
,-"'.-)(-+%/$0)#'1+((
230)#-4'5"6,'7"%/+08
93(8':;4':<=>
?"),-'9+%%",,'@A)+0$B
7+%8'."+#$#C'@D+66B
9+#C'E"9$-0",,"'@E%3/6B
!"#$%&&"#'()*&+,&*
!"#$%&'()**#%%'$+%*,',+'-.%$//'/$0#-1
!
Ravenhood Transcript
www.ravenhood.mono.net
Transcribed by Morten
Ravn Hansen
% '" *"
!"#$%&' !"()#$%&' *(#$%&' +",
# !
& %( % % " % )
% +
"# # ! $ + +% %
& %( ' "
% %
% % % %
"
, # ! &) % ' " & % '"
' + % % %
& % '"'
+ +
# #! ) )( ' & % %%
'
!
- -,./.0 *( +"11 -&./.0 -"11
##
" # '% + + & %+ % %%%
%
-% % % % % % '%% "" %
%( - ' % % % '
% % %% % %( %
!
%% % + 3,45
%% % % % % % % " ' " ' % % )
. *(2 +"11 -&./.0 *(2 -&./.0 -&
# % % % ' % %
"# # ' % ''
*" ( ' ' -'
&) % " &) % ' "
'
, ## '' & %" -) ' & %" ' -) +
#' ' '
!
/0
#
*", *("6, 3,#7&' -,#711' !"2 *(,89 -&./.0 *("6,
% + 26
+"2 Fig.
!
3:;7 -&./.0 -& *("6,2 +",
interest
because
this
is
where
he
combines
it
with
a
slight
ritardando
which
adds
to
+
%%% %% "" and
/1 ! -&./.0 -& *("6, +", -&./.0 -&
## % % + %" % + +
- %% - '' ""tension
% % %%% " - %% T-he
# -'' e-ffect
% + '+ result
of
+this
the
r" %' - % " # %
% '' % %musical
% % % % % % %of
the
p%hrase.
" (
ubatos
% the
% - % increases
+%" "
' %"
type
, -' % % ' % "
& place
'several
times
of
#combination,
which
takes
% throughout
''
+
% i)
this
ntroduction,
is
# # /' % ' ' ' ) %"
%" %( )
a
very
romantic
feel
(in
classical
terms)
and
an
emotive
setup
to
what
is,
lyrically,
a
!
38
next-to-no
insightful
material
on
how
it
can
aid
solo
jazz
guitar
playing.
In
my
opinion,
there
are
2
main
reasons
for
this
1)
When
learning
to
play
solo
the
initial
hurdles
that
are
faced
include
being
able
to
juggle
groove
and
tempo
along
with
harmony
and
melody
(at
least
from
my
personal
experience)
and
so
much
emphasis
is
put
on
trying
to
combine
these
different
aspects
of
playing
that
we
can
overlook
the
importance
of
other
musical
devices
such
as
time-manipulation.
Techniques,
such
as
the
ones
shown
in
Tuck
Andress
Fingerstyle
Mastery,
that
aid
in
playing
multiple
parts
of
songs
while
maintaining
the
tempo
and
feel
can
take
years
to
master
(10
years
in
Andress
case46)
so
there
is
no
surprise
to
the
oversight.
2)
It
would
seem
to
be
common
sense
for
a
solo
guitarist
to
have
an
understanding
that
he/she
is
in
total
control
of
the
time
and
should
therefore
be
able
to
manipulate
it
in
whichever
way
he/she
sees
fit.
But
what
is
common
sense
to
an
experienced
player,
with
years
of
intuitive
exploration,
is
not
the
same
for
a
guitarist
beginning
their
journey
in
solo
jazz
guitar.
To
compound
this
even
further
I
believe
that
time-
manipulation,
as
a
musical
technique,
is
so
personal
from
player
to
player
that
most
players
dont
even
know
what
they
are
doing
or
how
they
are
doing
it.
This
is
just
a
personal
opinion,
but
even
the
methodical
Andress
says
in
his
accompanying
booklet
to
Fingerstyle
Mastery
when
discussing
techniques
relating
to
his
own
feel:
Thats
hard
to
talk
about
I
still
dont
fully
understand
it
myself47.
Time
manipulation,
in
terms
of
solo
guitar,
can
be
heard
extensively
in
the
first
chorus
of
Joe
Pass
recording
of
Night
and
day
from
his
solo
album
Virtuoso48.
Fig.
27
shows
the
first
11
bars49
(note
the
authors
vague
yet
common
use
of
the
word
rubato
at
the
beginning):
46
ANDRESS,
T.
2005
(dvd
release).
Fingerstyle
Mastery.
Hot
Licks.
47
Ibid.
48
PASS,
J.
1974.
Virtuoso.
Berkeley
CA:
Pablo
Records.
49
POPARAD,
J.
year
unknown.
Jeremy
Poparad
[Online].
Available:
http://www.poparad.com/learn.php
[Accessed
2010].
39
Fig.
27
CD
track
15
Tempo
shifting
is
heard
and
seen,
for
example,
in
the
first
bar
with
the
wide
expansion
of
the
four
pulses
contained
within,
accentuated
with
the
chords
Eb-
7(b5),
B7(#9b5),
E-7(b5)
and
A7(b9).
Contained
pockets
of
free-time
playing
also
appear,
for
example
in
places
such
as
bars
2
and
5
where
the
abandonment
of
time
is
illustrated
by
the
fact
that
the
notes
do
not
add
up
rhythmically
to
the
amount
designated
by
the
time
signature
(also
seen
in
the
first
bar).
40
This
topic
has
a
large
scope
for
discussion,
much
larger
than
is
applicable
to
this
paper
but
outlining
it
as
a
technique
that
heightens
solo
guitar
performance
is
my
only
intention
for
the
moment.
41
7.
KEYS
AND
OPEN
STRINGS
FAMILIAR
TERRITORY
The
topic
of
key
signatures
for
solo
jazz
guitarists
is
another
in
which
I
believe
there
is
too
little
discussion.
It
can
appear
to
seem
unnecessary
considering
that
if
a
musician
is
capable
of
playing
this
style
of
music
he/she
is
most
likely
comfortable
with
transposing
songs
into
different
keys.
But
from
my
research
I
believe
that
some
of
the
benefits
of
choosing
appropriate
keys
tend
to
be
overlooked
in
popular
solo
jazz
guitar
literature.
In
the
world
of
jazz
standards,
key
transposition
is
a
device
used
most
extensively
by
vocalists.
This
comes
as
no
surprise
considering
that
in
terms
of
comfortable
range
amongst
the
most
popular
melodic
instruments
of
the
genre
(i.e.
vocals,
trumpet,
saxophone,
trombone,
piano
and
guitar)
they
have
the
least50,
thus
requiring
transposition
more
often
to
achieve
optimal
performances.
On
the
Sarah
Vaughan
Verve
Jazz
Masters
1851
recordings,
common
standards
such
as
My
funny
valentine,
How
high
the
moon,
Lullaby
of
Birdland,
All
the
things
you
are
and
Misty
are
all
transposed
from
their
original
keys,
popular
with
instrumentalists
(Cm,
G,
Ab,
Ab
and
Eb
respectively),
to
the
keys
of
Gm,
Eb,
D,
Eb
and
C.
Ella
Fitzgerald
recorded
Misty
in
B,
Frank
Sinatras
My
funny
valentine
was
regularly
performed
in
Bm,
and
they
both
recorded
their
famous
versions
of
All
the
things
you
are
in
F.
The
amount
of
worldwide
examples
throughout
history
could
carry
on
and
replace
in
number
the
sentences
of
this
paper.
As
opposed
to
vocalists,
other
jazz
instrumentalists
have
a
propensity
for
performing
standard
repertoire
in
original
keys
or
popular
lead
sheet
versions
as
those
found
in
the
Hal
Leonard
Real
Books.
However,
as
mentioned
briefly
in
chapter
3,
it
is
common
for
guitarists
to
transpose
melodies
up
and
down
octaves
to
place
them
in
desired
timbral
locations
on
the
instrument
but
the
2
main
reasons
for
transposing
50
SCHNEIDER,
J.
year
unknown.
Musical
Instrument
Range
Chart.
In:
CHART,
M.
I.
R.
(ed.)
John
R.
Pierce,
The
Science
of
Musical
Sound
(New
York,
1992),
pp.
18-19;
Donald
E.
Hall,
Mucical
Acoustics:
An
Introduction
(Pacific
Grove,
California,
1991),
inside
back
cover;
and
Edward
R.
Tufte,
Visual
Explanations
(Cheshire,
Connecticut,
2001),
p.
87.
51
VAUGHAN,
S.
1954-1963.
Sarah
Vaughan
Verve
Jazz
Masters
18.
In:
PULLMAN,
P.
(ed.)
Verve
Jazz
Masters.
42
to
other
keys
are
to
utilise
open
strings
and
to
shift
songs
from
especially
unfamiliar
guitar
keys.
An
example
of
the
latter
would
be
the
common
transposition
of
John
Coltranes
Mr.
P.C.
from
its
original
key
of
C#
minor
down
a
semitone
into
the
better
known
key
of
C
minor.
Similarly
in
the
pop
world,
it
has
become
very
customary
for
guitarists
and
bass
players
to
prefer
the
key
of
E
minor
to
the
original
Eb
minor
when
playing
Stevie
Wonders
1972
Motown
hit
Superstition.
This
reason
for
transposing
keys
is
substantially
more
common
in
other
musical
genres
such
as
this
(as
opposed
to
jazz)
with
my
belief
being
that
jazz
guitarists
are
generally
better
equipped
with
harmonic
and
fingerboard
knowledge
to
handle
awkward
keys.
The
more
important
reason
for
key
transposition
for
guitar
players
(particularly
solo
jazz
players)
and
the
one
I
wish
to
discuss
in
greater
detail
is
the
one
that
aims
to
make
greater
use
of
open
strings.
The
extensive
use
of
open
strings
in
jazz
guitar
music
(particularly
in
terms
of
physical
chord
shapes)
felt
like
a
very
revolutionary
concept
when
presented
to
me
by
a
teacher
many
years
ago.
This
may
seem
odd
considering
that,
like
many
guitarists,
open
position
was
the
first
port
of
call
for
me
when
learning
chord
shapes
on
the
instrument.
However,
my
belief
is
that
many
jazz
guitarists
begin
with
exploring
open
position
(as
most
non-jazz
guitarists
also)
before
undertaking
study
of
chords
and
shapes
particular
to
the
jazz
tradition
which
are
generally
fingered
in
ways
to
abstain
from
using
open
strings
in
order
to
utilise
them
as
moveable
shapes.
Take
the
following
example:
Fig.
28
43
Because
the
first
Am9
chord
uses
no
open
strings
guitarists
are
able
to
move
the
shape
up
and
down
the
neck
in
order
to
exploit
it
for
different
chords,
i.e.
moved
back
a
tone
would
make
it
Gm9,
moved
up
a
semitone
would
be
Bbm9
etc.
Conversely,
the
second
shape
cannot
be
shifted
due
to
the
open
strings,
although
it
can
be
used
to
function
as
different
chords
if
viewed
as
an
inversion,
for
example
Cmajor7/A.
When
learning
to
play
in
various
jazz
styles
the
former
varieties
of
shapes
aid
in
obtaining
a
large
store
of
easy-to-grab
chords
quicker,
and
because
the
potential
combinations
of
intervals
making
them
up
is
quite
extensive,
jazz
guitarists
can
easily
make
careers
in
which
open-string
exploration
is
never
returned
to.
It
was
an
article
from
Guitar
Player
magazine,
brought
to
my
attention
by
Melbourne
guitarist
and
my
former
teacher
Robbie
Melville,
which
sparked
an
interest
in
the
possibilities
for
open
strings
in
jazz.
In
it,
leading
jazz
guitarist
Bill
Frisell
is
interviewed
concerning
the
musical
devices
he
employs
for
achieving
his
distinct
sound,
and
the
use
of
open
strings
is
a
big
part
of
that.
Author
Jude
Gold
describes
Frisells
unique
use
of
open
strings
for
creating
harmony:
When
playing
melodies,
Frisell
often
plucks
notes
on
different
strings
and
lets
them
ring
against
each
other.
These
overlapping
tones
create
stabs
of
harmony
that
enrich
a
melodic
phrase.
(2002:96)
Frisell
expands
on
this
by
giving
an
example
of
one
way
in
which
he
may
approach
the
playing
of
an
Em11
chord52:
Fig.
29
52
GOLD,
J.
2002.
The
Big
Bang.
Guitar
Player.
44
His
extensive
use
of
such
techniques
can
be
heard
on
many
of
his
recordings
including
throughout
his
2005
rendition
of
Norman
Whitfield
and
Barrett
Strongs
hit
I
heard
it
through
the
grapevine53,
best
known
from
Marvin
Gayes
1968
version.
The
entire
song
is
an
excellent
example
of
what
kind
of
possibilities
can
be
taken
advantage
of
when
a
song
is
transposed
to
a
key
inclusive
of
open
strings
Frisells
rendition
is
in
E
minor
where
all
open
strings
can
be
brought
into
play
whereas
Gayes
popular
version
was
recorded
in
Eb
minor
which
contains
no
open
string
possibilities
for
guitar).
Another
improvising
guitarist
who
exploits
tonal
possibilities
within
chords
using
open
strings
is
Ralph
Towner.
In
a
2008
paper
on
Towner
from
the
University
of
Melbourne,
H.
Stuckey
stated:
It
(the
use
of
open
strings)
forms
an
essential
part
of
his
chordal
approach
to
playing,
as
the
open
strings
are
used
to
extend
and
add
tones
to
chords
which
might
not
otherwise
be
available.
This
not
only
leads
to
an
extension
of
chordal
possibilities
but
also
to
a
range
of
quite
unusual,
and
in
some
cases
unexpected,
chord
voicings.(2008:18)54
This
is
very
much
in
line
with
Frisells
approach
although
in
a
slightly
less
horizontal
manner,
for
while
Frisell
creates
a
lot
of
his
harmony
by
superimposing
melodic
fragments
on
adjacent
strings
and
allowing
them
to
bleed
into
each
other
as
in
the
previous
example,
Towner
utilizes
vertical
shapes
intersected
by
open
strings,
seen
here
in
Fig.
30
from
Stuckeys
paper:
53
FRISELL,
B.
2005.
East
West.
In:
EDRIDGE-WAKS,
R.
(ed.).
New
York:
Nonesuch
Records.
54
STUCKEY,
H.
2008.
Discovering
Musical
Identity:
An
exploration
of
the
solo
guitar
improvisation
of
Ralph
Towner,
with
particular
reference
to
the
elements,
and
their
contributing
factors,
that
shapes
the
creation
of
his
complete,
unique
musical
identity.
honours,
Melbourne
University.
45
Fig.
30
This
transcription
of
Towners
2001
interpretation
of
Glorias
step55
demonstrates
the
large
range
that
can
be
taken
advantage
of
when
employing
open
strings,
e.g.
the
perfect
12th
on
the
adjacent
B
and
E
strings
seen
in
the
first
chord
would
usually
be
completely
impossible.
In
such
solo
guitar
contexts,
opportunities
opened
up
by
using
keys
containing
open
strings
are
even
more
beneficial
than
the
purely
textural
ones
offered
in
ensemble
situations.
An
advantage
of
solo
players
using
them
is
that
they
offer
a
chance
to
easily
achieve
a
sense
of
overlapping
harmony
that
can
be
static
and
shifting
at
the
one
time.
An
example
of
this
is
a
solo
piece
of
my
own
which
makes
use
of
the
open
G
and
D
strings
as
drones
throughout
a
section
with
2
other
shifting
voices,
resulting
in
them
acting
as
different
scale
degrees
throughout
each
chord.
Fig.
31
55
TOWNER,
R.
2001.
Anthem.
Munich:
ECM.
46
In
the
Bb6/9
the
D
and
G
act
as
the
3rd
and
6th
respectively,
in
the
Csus
they
are
the
2nd
and
5th,
in
the
Dsus
they
are
the
tonic
and
4th,
in
the
Em9
they
are
the
minor
7th
and
minor
3rd,
and
in
the
F6/9
they
act
as
the
6th
and
9th.
Drones
on
open
strings
can
also
be
used
in
the
lower
register
to
allow
for
melodies
or
shifting
harmonies
in
higher
voices
and
can
be
particularly
useful
for
modal
pieces
due
to
their
long
periods
of
static
harmony.
This
technique
has
been
used
extensively
in
folk
music
all
around
the
world
including
in
the
jazz
precursor,
the
American
blues.
47
8.
CONCLUSION
The
study
of
unaccompanied
jazz
guitar
is
a
lifelong
commitment
and
there
are
many
restrictions
to
what
an
instrumentalist
can
physically
achieve
within
this
solo
context.
However
the
practice
opens
up
many
other
possibilities
in
terms
of
control
-
control
of
rhythm,
time,
harmony,
form,
intention,
and
nearly
every
other
musical
aspect.
To
fully
explore
these
possibilities
it
is
important
for
guitarists
to
understand
them
by
observing
how
the
masters
define
them.
With
this
knowledge,
boundaries
can
be
explored
and
new
frontiers
can
be
reached
within
the
genre.
The
concepts
and
techniques
discussed
in
this
paper
all
have
their
origins
within
the
playing
of
the
masters
(as
shown
in
the
musical
examples
and
text
references)
and
therefore
aid
in
establishing
a
clear
outline
for
the
scope
of
what
unaccompanied
jazz
is
today
and
how
to
approach
its
practice.
My
initial
reason
for
collecting
this
material
was
precisely
for
that
reason
and
I
am
optimistic
that
it
will
also
bring
to
light
some
issues
that
seem
to
be
lacking
discussion
within
the
pedagogical
material.
Due
to
the
limited
size
of
this
paper
and
the
broad
issues
raised
within,
there
is
a
vast
span
for
further
research
into
the
techniques
I
have
described,
not
to
mention
others
which
I
may
have
neglected.
These
could
include
techniques
relating
to
physical
prowess,
form
control,
or
even
psychological
issues
faced
by
solo
jazz
guitarists.
In
terms
of
the
techniques
I
have
discussed,
further
possibilities
for
research
could
include
a
detailed
analysis
of
what
the
human
mind
is
capable
of
in
terms
of
closure
in
relation
to
solo
guitar
and
studying
the
different
degrees
to
which
individual
people
perceive
ghost
parts
of
that
particular
music.
Also
of
interest
could
be
the
evolution
of
the
traditional
jazz
guitar
style
in
contrast
to
what
could
have
been
had
it
begun
with
a
more
contrapuntal
mindset.
The
entire
concept
of
contrapuntal
solo
jazz
guitar
also
has
extensive
room
for
exploration
and
I
felt
that
I
but
touched
on
its
relevance
and
emerging
prevalence
in
the
genre
in
what
can
be
seen
as
a
stepping
stone
for
well
needed
research.
48
Direct
interviews
with
leading
guitarists
regarding
the
issues
in
each
chapter
would
be
phenomenally
insightful
and
my
biggest
regret
is
that
this
paper
could
not
contain
more
information
received
from
leading
guitarists
in
a
one-on-one
format.
This
is
better
suited
to
a
paper
capable
of
supporting
a
larger
scope
such
as
a
masters
dissertation
or
doctorate
paper.
The
potential
of
an
expansion
of
this
material
into
something
that
can
be
made
available
for
the
general
public
is
also
a
very
real
possibility
considering
some
of
the
gaps
in
what
is
currently
offered
concerning
solo
jazz
guitar.
49
9.
REFERENCES
1988a.
In:
KERNFELD,
B.
(ed.)
The
New
Grove
Dictionary
of
Jazz.
London:
Macmillan.
1988b.
In:
KERNFELD,
B.
(ed.)
The
new
Grove
Dictionary
of
jazz
A
to
K.
New
York:
Macmillan
Press.
2006.
Gestalt
Psychology.
In:
DAVEY,
G.
(ed.)
Encyclopaedic
dictionary
of
psychology.
London:
Hodder
Arnold.
2010.
Charlie
Hunter
solidbody
8
string
[Online].
Eugene,
Oregon:
Novax.
Available:
http://www.novaxguitars.com/sales/ch8.html
[Accessed
2010].
ALLAN-BROWNE-QUINTET
2004.
Cyclosporin.
Melbourne:
Jazz
head.
(CD).
ANDRESS,
T.
2005
(dvd
release).
Fingerstyle
Mastery.
Hot
Licks.
(DVD).
BACH,
J.
S.Unknown-1750.
Die
Kunst
der
Fuge,
Contrapunctus
1,
BWV
1080.
Breitkopf
&
Hrtel.
BALL
MAGNUSSON
BERESOVSKY,
E.
S.
S.2003
Healing
songs.
(CD).
BARRA,
D.
1983.
The
dynamic
performance
-
A
performer's
guide
to
musical
expression
and
interpretation,
Sydney,
Prentice
Hall
(of
Australia).
BRUCHEZ,
O.
1999-2010.
Keithjarret.org
[Online].
Word
press.
Available:
http://www.keithjarrett.org/transcriptions/
[Accessed
2010].
DAMIAN,
J.
2001.
The
guitarist's
guide
to
composing
and
improvising,
Boston,
MA,
Berklee.
FRISELL,
B.
2005.
East
West.
In:
EDRIDGE-WAKS,
R.
(ed.).
New
York:
Nonesuch
Records.
(CD).
GALBRAITH,
B.
1986.
Jazz
guitar
study
series:
guitar
comping,
New
Albany,
IM,
Jamey
Aebersold.
GOLD,
J.
2002.
The
Big
Bang.
Guitar
Player.
GOODMAN,
F.
2002.
Puremusic
interview
with
Charlie
Hunter.
Puremusic.com.
GOODRICK,
M.
1987.
The
advancing
guitarist,
Third
Earth.
GREENE,
T.
1981.
Chord
chemistry,
Alfred
music
publishing.
GREENE,
T.
1985.
Modern
Chord
Progressions,
Van
Nuys
CA,
Alfred
Music
Publishing.
HASELTINE,
D.
E.
2010.
Optical
illusions
can
you
help
predict
the
future?
[Online].
Hyperion.
Available:
50
http://longfusebigbang.com/blog/optical_illusions_can_help_you_predict_th
e_future/
[Accessed
03/09/10
2010].
HEKSELMAN,
G.
2006.
Split
life.
New
York:
Smalls
Records.
(CD).
HILLIARD,
S.
F.
B.
1951.
Alice
in
wonderland.
The
real
book.
Milwakee
WI:
Hal
Leonard.
JARRET,
K.
1988.
Still
live.
ECM.
(CD).
LARS
RIECKE,
FABRIZIO
ESPOSITO,
MILENE
BONT,
ELIA
FORMISANO.
2009.
Hearing
Illusory
Sounds
in
Noise:
The
Timing
of
Sensory-Perceptual
Transformations
in
Auditory
Cortex.
Neuron,
64,
550-561.
LEITCH,
P.
1991.
Trio/Quartet
'91.
(CD).
MARTINO,
P.
2006.
Remember
-
a
tribute
to
Wes
Montgomery.
Blue
Note.
(CD).
METHENY,
P.
2003.
One
quiet
night.
Warner
Brothers.
(CD).
MONDER,
B.
2005.
Oceana.
(CD).
MONTGOMERY,
W.
1962.
Full
House
(live).
(CD).
MULLER,
J.
2006.
Kaboom.
(CD).
PASS,
J.
1974.
Virtuoso.
Berkeley
CA:
Pablo
Records.
(CD).
PASS,
J.
1986.
Joe
Pass
-
solo
jazz
guitar.
Hot
Licks.
(DVD).
POPARAD,
J.
year
unknown.
Jeremy
Poparad
[Online].
Available:
http://www.poparad.com/learn.php
[Accessed
2010].
SCHNEIDER,
J.
year
unknown.
Musical
Instrument
Range
Chart.
In:
CHART,
M.
I.
R.
(ed.)
John
R.
Pierce,
The
Science
of
Musical
Sound
(New
York,
1992),
pp.
18-
19;
Donald
E.
Hall,
Mucical
Acoustics:
An
Introduction
(Pacific
Grove,
California,
1991),
inside
back
cover;
and
Edward
R.
Tufte,
Visual
Explanations
(Cheshire,
Connecticut,
2001),
p.
87.
SCHROETER,
J.
1995.
Tuck
Andress
-
Aural
report.
Fingerstyle
Guitar.
SHERLOCK,
J.
2010.
Solo.
Pinnacles
Music.
(CD).
SHIRLEY,
A.
2006.
Tempo
rubato.
The
North
American
Review,
291,
42.
STUCKEY,
H.
2008.
Discovering
Musical
Identity:
An
exploration
of
the
solo
guitar
improvisation
of
Ralph
Towner,
with
particular
reference
to
the
elements,
and
their
contributing
factors,
that
shapes
the
creation
of
his
complete,
unique
musical
identity.
honours,
Melbourne
University.
51
TOWNER,
R.
1985.
Improvisation
and
Performance
Techniques
for
Classical
and
Acoustic
Guitar,
Wayne
N.J.,
21st
Century
Music
Productions.
TOWNER,
R.
2001.
Anthem.
Munich:
ECM.
TUPAMAROS,
L.
2008.
20
anos
de
exitos.
Discos
Fuentes.
(CD).
VAUGHAN,
S.
1954-1963.
Sarah
Vaughan
Verve
Jazz
Masters
18.
In:
PULLMAN,
P.
(ed.)
Verve
Jazz
Masters.
(CD).
VILLA-LOBOS,
H.
1952.
Etude
No
5
Andantino.
Villa-Lobos
solo
guitar.
New
York:
Amsco.
52
10.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX
A
CD
track
list
1. Excerpt
from
Etude
no
5
Andantino
Heitor
Villa-Lobos
2. Excerpt
from
Man
in
the
mirror
Tuck
Andress
3. Excerpt
from
Double
sun
Ben
Monder
4. Excerpt
from
My
song
Pat
Metheny
5. Excerpt
from
Ive
grown
accustomed
to
her
face
Wes
Montgomery
6. Excerpt
from
Tones
for
Joans
Bones
Peter
Leitch
7. Excerpt
from
All
the
things
you
are
James
Muller
8. Study
in
C,
Opus
6
no.
8
Fernando
Sor
9. Excerpt
from
I
fall
in
love
too
easily
Gilad
Hekselman
10. Excerpt
from
Enamorao
Los
Tupamaros
11. Excerpt
from
Four
on
six
Pat
Martino
12. Excerpt
from
Domestic
arts
and
sciences
James
Sherlock
13. Excerpt
from
Snoring
waters
Allan
Browne
Quintet
14. Excerpt
from
My
funny
valentine
Keith
Jarrett
Trio
15. Excerpt
from
Night
and
day
Joe
Pass
APPENDIX
B
Hunters
original
8-string
guitar
prior
to
its
downsizing
to
7
strings:
(2010)
53
APPENDIX
C
In
regards
to
guitar
chord
diagrams,
Stuckey
states:
Strings
are
represented
by
vertical
lines
while
frets
are
represented
by
horizontal
lines.
The
string
lowest
in
pitch
(the
sixth
string)
is
found
on
the
leftmost
line,
likewise
the
string
highest
in
pitch
(the
first
string)
is
found
on
the
rightmost
line.
The
guitars
nut
is
represented
by
the
topmost
line,
and
frets
are
represented
by
subsequent
horizontal
lines.
A
dot
drawn
at
the
intersection
of
two
lines
is
used
to
represent
a
note
played
on
that
particular
string
at
that
particular
fret.
Chord
diagrams
can
also
illustrate
open
strings
(strings
that
are
played
without
any
left
hand
fingers
on)
and
strings
that
are
not
sounded
at
all.
Open
strings
are
represented
with
a
circle
at
the
top
of
the
string,
while
strings
that
are
not
played
are
represented
by
a
cross.(Stuckey,
2008)
54
1988a.
In:
KERNFELD,
B.
(ed.)
The
new
Grove
Dictionary
of
jazz
A
to
K.
New
York:
Macmillan
Press.
1988b.
In:
KERNFELD,
B.
(ed.)
The
New
Grove
Dictionary
of
Jazz.
London:
Macmillan.
2006.
Gestalt
Psychology.
In:
DAVEY,
G.
(ed.)
Encyclopaedic
dictionary
of
psychology.
London:
Hodder
Arnold.
2010.
Charlie
Hunter
solidbody
8
string
[Online].
Eugene,
Oregon:
Novax.
Available:
http://www.novaxguitars.com/sales/ch8.html
[Accessed
2010].
ALLAN-BROWNE-QUINTET
2004.
Cyclosporin.
Melbourne:
Jazz
head.
ANDRESS,
T.
2005
(dvd
release).
Fingerstyle
Mastery.
Hot
Licks.
BACH,
J.
S.?-1750.
Die
Kunst
der
Fuge,
Contrapunctus
1,
BWV
1080.
Breitkopf
&
Hrtel.
BALL
MAGNUSSON
BERESOVSKY,
E.
S.
S.????
Healing
songs.
BARRA,
D.
1983.
The
dynamic
performance
-
A
performer's
guide
to
musical
expression
and
iterpretation,
Sydney,
Prentice
Hall
(of
Australia).
BRUCHEZ,
O.
1999-2010.
Keithjarret.org
[Online].
Word
press.
Available:
http://www.keithjarrett.org/transcriptions/
[Accessed
2010].
DAMIAN,
J.
2001.
The
guitarist's
guide
to
composing
and
improvising,
Boston,
MA,
Berklee.
FRISELL,
B.
2005.
East
West.
In:
EDRIDGE-WAKS,
R.
(ed.).
New
York:
Nonesuch
Records.
GALBRAITH,
B.
1986.
Jazz
guitar
study
series:
guitar
comping,
New
Albany,
IM,
Jamey
Aebersold.
GOLD,
J.
2002.
The
Big
Bang.
Guitar
Player.
GOODMAN,
F.
2002.
Puremusic
interview
with
Charlie
Hunter.
Puremusic.com.
GOODRICK,
M.
1987.
The
advancing
guitarist,
Third
Earth.
GREENE,
T.
1981.
Chord
chemistry,
Alfred
music
publishing.
55
GREENE,
T.
1985.
Modern
Chord
Progressions,
Van
Nuys
CA,
Alfred
Music
Publishing.
HASELTINE,
D.
E.
2010.
Optical
illusions
can
you
help
predict
the
future?
[Online].
Hyperion.
Available:
http://longfusebigbang.com/blog/optical_illusions_can_help_you_predict
_the_future/
[Accessed
03/09/10
2010].
HEKSELMAN,
G.
2006.
Split
life.
New
York:
Smalls
Records.
HILLIARD,
S.
F.
B.
1951.
Alice
in
wonderland.
The
real
book.
Milwakee
WI:
Hal
Leonard.
JARRET,
K.
1988.
Still
live.
ECM.
LARS
RIECKE,
FABRIZIO
ESPOSITO,
MILENE
BONT,
ELIA
FORMISANO.
2009.
Hearing
Illusory
Sounds
in
Noise:
The
Timing
of
Sensory-Perceptual
Transformations
in
Auditory
Cortex.
Neuron,
64,
550-561.
LEITCH,
P.
1991.
Trio/Quartet
'91.
MARTINO,
P.
2006.
Remember
-
a
tribute
to
Wes
Montgomery.
Blue
Note.
METHENY,
P.
2003.
One
quiet
night.
Warner
Brothers.
MONDER,
B.
2005.
Oceana.
MONTGOMERY,
W.
1962.
Full
House
(live).
MULLER,
J.
2006.
Kaboom.
PASS,
J.
1974.
Virtuoso.
Berkeley
CA:
Pablo
Records.
PASS,
J.
1986.
Joe
Pass
-
solo
jazz
guitar.
Hot
Licks.
POPARAD,
J.
year
unknown.
Jeremy
Poparad
[Online].
Available:
http://www.poparad.com/learn.php
[Accessed
2010].
SCHNEIDER,
J.
year
unknown.
Musical
Instrument
Range
Chart.
In:
CHART,
M.
I.
R.
(ed.)
John
R.
Pierce,
The
Science
of
Musical
Sound
(New
York,
1992),
pp.
18-19;
Donald
E.
Hall,
Mucical
Acoustics:
An
Introduction
(Pacific
Grove,
California,
1991),
inside
back
cover;
and
Edward
R.
Tufte,
Visual
Explanations
(Cheshire,
Connecticut,
2001),
p.
87.
SCHROETER,
J.
1995.
Tuck
Andress
-
Aural
report.
Fingerstyle
Guitar.
SHERLOCK,
J.
2010.
Solo.
Pinnacles
Music.
SHIRLEY,
A.
2006.
Tempo
rubato.
The
North
American
Review,
291,
42.
STUCKEY,
H.
2008.
Discovering
Musical
Identity:
An
exploration
of
the
solo
guitar
improvisation
of
Ralph
Towner,
with
particular
reference
to
the
elements,
and
their
contributing
factors,
that
shapes
the
creation
of
his
complete,
unique
musical
identity.
honours,
Melbourne
University.
TOWNER,
R.
1985.
Improvisation
and
Performance
Techniques
for
Classical
and
Acoustic
Guitar,
Wayne
N.J.,
21st
Century
Music
Productions.
TOWNER,
R.
2001.
Anthem.
Munich:
ECM.
TUPAMAROS,
L.
2008.
20
anos
de
exitos.
Discos
Fuentes.
VAUGHAN,
S.
1954-1963.
Sarah
Vaughan
Verve
Jazz
Masters
18.
In:
PULLMAN,
P.
(ed.)
Verve
Jazz
Masters.
VILLA-LOBOS,
H.
1952.
Etude
No
5
Andantino.
Villa-Lobos
solo
guitar.
New
York:
Amsco.
56