Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
mathematicaltools
Basicscientifictheoriesusuallystartwithasetofhypothesesorpostulates.Thereisgenerallynological
reason,apartfrominternalconsistency,thatcanbegiventojustifysuchpostulatesabsolutely.Theycomefrom
revelations in the minds of geniuses, most likely with hints from Nature based on extensive careful
observations.Theirgeneral validitycanonlybeestablishedthroughexperimentalverification.Ifnumerous
rigorously derived logical consequences of a very small set of postulates all agree with experimental
observationswithoutexception,oneisinclinedtoacceptthesepostulatesascorrectdescriptionsofthelawsof
Natureandusethemconfidentlytoexplainandpredictothernaturalphenomena.Quantummechanicsisno
exception.Itisbasedonafewpostulates.Forthepurposeofthepresentdiscussion,webeginwiththreebasic
postulatesinvolving:thestatefunctions,operators,andequationsofmotion.
Inthischapter,thissetofbasicpostulatesandsomeofthecorollariesandrelateddefinitionsoftermsare
introduced and discussed. We will first simply state these postulates and introduce some of the related
mathematicaltoolsandconceptsthatareneededtoarriveattheirlogicalconsequenceslater.Tothosewhohave
notbeenexposedtothesubjectofquantummechanicsbefore,eachofthesepostulatestakenbyitselfmay
appearpuzzlingandmeaninglessatfirst.Itshouldbeborneinmind,however,thatitisthecollectionofthese
postulatesasawholethatformsthefoundationsofquantummechanics.Thefullinterpretation,andthepower
andglory,ofthesepostulateswillonlyberevealedgraduallyastheyaresuccessfullyappliedtomorerealistic
andincreasinglycomplicatedphysicalproblemsinlaterchapters.
2.1Statefunctions(Postulate1)
Thefirstpostulatestatesthatthestateofadynamicsystemiscompletelyspecifiedbyastatefunction.
Evenwithoutacleardefinitionofwhatastatefunctionis,thissimplepostulatealreadymakesaspecificclaim:
thereexistsanabstractstatefunctionthatcontainsalltheinformationaboutthestateofthedynamicsystem.For
thisstatementtohavemeaning,wemustobviouslyprovideaclearphysicalinterpretationofthestatefunction,
andspecifyitsmathematicalproperties.Wemustalsogiveaprescriptionofhowquantitativeinformationisto
beextractedfromthestatefunctionandcomparedwithexperimentalresults.
2.1Statefunctions(Postulate1)9
A fundamental distinction between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics is that, in classical
mechanics, the state of the dynamic system is completely specified by the position and velocity of each
constituentpart(orparticle)ofthesystem.Thispresumesthatthepositionandvelocityofaparticlecan,atleast
inprinciple,bemeasuredandspecifiedpreciselyateachinstantoftime.Thepositionandvelocityoftheparticle
atoneinstantoftimearecompletelydeterminedbythepositionandvelocityoftheparticleatapreviousinstant.
Itisdeterministic.Thatonecanspecifythestateofaparticleinthemacroscopicworldinthiswayisintuitively
obvious,becauseonecanseeandtouchsuchaparticle.Itisintuitivelyobviousthatitispossibletomeasureits
positionandvelocitysimultaneously.And,iftwoparticlesarenotatthesameplaceornotmovingwiththe
samevelocity,theyareobviouslynotinthesamestate.
Whataboutintheworldontheatomicandsubatomicscalewherewecannotseeortouchanyparticle
directly?Thereisnoassurancethatourintuitiononhowthingsworkinourworldcanbeextrapolatedtoamuch
smallerworldinwhichwehavenodirectsensorialexperience.Indeed,inquantummechanics,noapriori
assumptionismadeaboutthepossibilityofmeasuringorspecifyingpreciselythepositionandthevelocityof
theparticleatthesametime.Infact,aswillbediscussedinmoredetaillater,accordingtoHeisenbergs
uncertaintyprinciple,itisdecidedlynotpossibletohavecompletesimultaneousknowledgeofthetwo;a
complete formulationof thisprinciple will be given in connection withPostulate 2in Section2.2 below.
Furthermore, quantum mechanics does not presume that measurement of the position of a particle will
necessarilyyieldaparticularvalueofxpredictably.KnowingtheparticleisinthestateC,themostspecific
informationonthepositionoftheparticlethatonecanhopetogetbyanypossiblemeansofmeasurementisthat
theprobabilityofgettingthevaluex
:x
relativetothatofgettingthevaluex
isjx
jj
dxis,inthelanguageofprobabilitytheory,proportionaltotheprobabilityoffindingtheparticle
intherangefromxtox+dxinanymeasurementofthepositionoftheparticle.Ifitisknownforcertainthat
thereisoneparticleinthespatialrangefromx=0tox=L,thentheprobabilitydistributionfunction xjj
integratedoverthisrangemustbeequalto1andthewavefunctionissaidtobenormalized:
114
xdx14
xjj
dx:(2:1)0
Ifthewavefunctionisnormalized,theabsolutevalueoftheprobabilityoffindingtheparticleintherangefrom
xtox+dxisxjj
dx.Accordingly,thereisalsoan
102Basicpostulatesandmathematicaltools
,averagevalue,hxi
ofthepositionoftheparticleinthestateC,whichiscalledtheexpectationvalueofthe
positionoftheparticle.Itisanordinarynumbergivenby:
hxi
Z14
xxxdx14
xxjj
dx:(2:2)0
0
Ameansquaredeviation,x2,fromtheaverageoftheprobablepositionoftheparticlecanalsobe
defined:
x214
xhxi
xdx14
xhxi
xjj
dx;(2:3)
whichgivesameasureofthespreadoftheprobabilitydistributionfunction,xjj
,ofthex
positionpffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffix2
asarounddefinedthein(2.3)averageiscalledvalue.theuncertaintyInthelanguageintheofposition
quantumxofmechanics,theparticlewhenitisinthestateC(x).Thedefinitionsoftheaveragevalueandthe
meansquaredeviation,oruncertainty,canalsobegeneralizedtoanyfunctionofx,suchasanyoperator
intheSchro dingerrepresentation,aswillbediscussedinSection2.3.
Amoredetailedexplanationoftheaboveprobabilisticinterpretationoftheamplitudeofthestatefunction
isinorderatthispoint.xjj
dx.xtox+dx,N
,tothetotalnumberofmeasureStatingitinanotherway,thenumberoftimesaparticleisfoundinthe
differentialrangex
tox
+dxisintheratioofN
:N
14fromjx
1x
1j
2to:jx
+dx2
tothatintherangefromj
.Theexpectationvalueofthepositionofthe
particle,hxi
,istheaverageofthemeasuredpositionsoftheparticles:
hxi
Z14x
1N
2N
x
3N
14
xxjj
dx;0
asgivenbyEq.(2.2).Theuncertainty,x,isthespreadofthemeasuredpositionsaroundtheaveragevalue:
x214x
hxi
Nx
hxi
Nx
x
3
3N
14
hxi
ZL
xhxi
xjj
dx;
asgivenbyEq.(2.3).
2.1Statefunctions(Postulate1)11
Theessenceofthediscussionsofaristhattherelationshipbetweenthephysicallymeasurablepropertiesofa
dynamicsystemandthestatefunctionofthesysteminquantummechanicsisprobabilistictobeginwith.The
implicationisthatthepredictionofthefuturecourseofthedynamicsofthesystemintermsofphysically
measurablepropertiesis,accordingtoquantummechanics,necessarilyprobabilistic,notdeterministic,even
thoughthetimeevolutionofthestatefunctionitselfisdetermineduniquelybyitsinitialconditionaccordingto
Schro dingersequation,asweshallsee.
ItisalsoassumedasapartofPostulate1thatthestatefunctionsatisfiestheprincipleofsuperposition,
meaningthelinearcombinationoftwostatefunctionsisalsoapossiblestatefunction:
14a
;(2:4)
wherea
anda
are,ingeneral,complexnumbers(withrealandimaginaryparts).Thissimplepropertyhas
profoundmathematicalandphysicalimplications,aswillbeseenlater.
Thephysicalsignificanceofthephase,,ofastatefunction,C,isindirectandmoresubtle.Inadditiontoits
xdependence,thephasefactoralsogivestheexplicittimedependenceofthewavefunction,aswillbeshown
laterinconnectionwiththesolutionofSchro dingersequation.Itis,therefore,offundamentalimportanceto
theunderstandingofthedynamicsofatomicandsubatomicparticles.
The following example making use of the superposition principle may help to illustrate the physical
significanceofthisphasefactor.SupposeeachparticleinthestateCinthestatisticalensemblecanevolvefrom
twodifferentpossiblepathswiththerelativeprobabilityofja
:ja
2
.Theatomsinthefinalensembleare,however,indistinguishablefromone
anotherandeachisinamixedstatethatisasuperpositionoftwostatesC
andC
,intheformofEq.(2.4).Theprobabilitydistributionfunctionoftheparticles
inthefinalstateintheensembleis,however,proportionaltojj
.Itcontainsnotonlythetermsa
butalsothecrossterms,ortheinterference
terms(a1
jj
jj
jj
jja
2
j
jj
jei
a2
jj
jei
).Thus,jj
dependson,amongotherthings,therelativephase(
)andtherelativephasesofa
1
anda
.Inshort,sincetheprobabilitydistributionfunctionisproportionaltothesquareofthestatefunction,
wheneverthefinalstatefunctionisasuperpositionoftwoormorestatefunctions,theprobabilitydistribution
functioncorrespondingtothefinalstatedependsontherelativephasesoftheconstituentstatefunctions.Itcan
lead tointerference effects,muchas inthe familiar constructive anddestructiveinterfer encephenomena
involvingelectromagneticwaves.Thisisoneofthemanifestationsofthewaveparticledualitypredictedby
quantummechanicsandhasbeenobservedinnumerousexperiments.Ithasledtoagreatvarietyofimportant
practicalapplicationsandisoneofthemajortriumphsofquantummechanics.
Thesuperpositionofstatesoftwoormorequantumsystemsthatleadstocorrelatedoutcomesinthe
measurementsofthesesystemsisoftendescribedasentanglementinquantuminformationsciencein
recentliterature.
2.2Operators(Postulate2)
Thesecondpostulatestatesthatallphysicallyobservablepropertiesofadynamicsystemarerepresentedby
dynamicvariablesthatarelinearoperators.Tounderstandwhatanoperatoris,letuslookatwhatitdoesand
whatitsmathematicalpropertiesandthecorrespondingphysicalinterpretationare.
First,itsconnectiontoexperimentalresultsisthefollowing.Consider,forexample,anoperator
correspondingtothedynamicvariablerepresentingthepropertyQofthesystem.According
toquantummechanics,knowingthesystemisinthestateCdoesnotmeanthatmeasurementofthepropertyQ
willnecessarilyyieldacertainparticularvalue.Itwillonlytellusthatrepeatedmeasurementsofthesame
propertyQofsimilarsystems,ormeasurementsofalargenumberofsimilarsystems,allinthesamestateC,
willgiveastatisticaldistributionofvalueswithanaveragevalueequalto:
ZQi
14
Qd~r;
(2:5a)
whichistheexpectationvalueofthepropertyQ,andanuncertainty:
Q214
Z
~r
Qi
~rd~r;(2:5b)
ingeneralthethreedimensionalafunctionofthecanonicalSchro dingervariables
representation.~rand
~p
andBecausecanbeatheoperator
isindifferentialoperator,onecannotarbitrarilyreversetheorderofmultiplicationofC*and
Q.
Eqs.(2.5a&b)aregeneralizationsof
Eqs.(2.2)and(2.3)thatintroducedtheconceptsofexpectationvaluesanduncertainties.
Second,mathematically,anoperatoronlyhasmeaningwhenitoperatesonastatefunction.Ingeneral,an
operatorchangesonestatefunctiontoanother.Forexample,theoperator
appliedtoanarbitrarystatefunctionCgenerallychangesitintoanotherstate:
14:(2:6)
Thetruemeaningofthissimpleabstractequationwillnotbeclearuntilweknowexactlyhowtofindthe
operatorexpressionrepresentingeachphysicalproperty.AscorollariesofPostulate2,thereisasetofruleson
howtodosoforeverydynamicpropertyofthesystem.
Corollary1
Allthedynamicvariablesand,hence,allthecorrespondingoperatorsrepresentinganypropertyofthesystem
havethesamefunctionaldependenceonthecanonicalvariables
representingtheposition,
1.thenotionofcommutationrelationshipandtheuncertaintyprinciple;and2.theconceptofeigen
valuesandeigenfunctions.
Commutationrelationsandtheuncertaintyprinciple
Aninterestingquestionthatcannowbeaddressedisthis.Howdoesoneknowwhetheritispossibletohave
completesimultaneousknowledgeoftwospecificpropertiesofasystem,sayAandB?
Physically,fortwopropertiestobespecifiedsimultaneously,itmustbepossibletomeasureoneofthetwo
propertieswithoutinfluencingtheoutcomeofthemeasurement
2.2Operators(Postulate2)13
~r,andthelinearmomentum,
142Basicpostulatesandmathematicaltools
oftheotherproperty,andviceversa.Inshort,theorderofmeasurementsofthetwopropertiesshouldnot
matter,nomatterwhatstatethesystemisin.Thismeansthatapplicationoftheoperator
ofthepositionandmomentumoftheparticlesintheensemblemustbegreaterthanorequalto h/2.Equation
(2.12) shows that this uncertainty principle (2.13) is at the same time a consequence of the commutation
relationships(2.11a)and(2.11b),whichsaysthat measurementsofthepositionandthemomentum ofthe
particlearenotindependentofeachother.
Onemightquestionwhetherthekeyresult(2.13)oftheuncertaintyprincipleisphysicallyreasonable.Inthe
macroscopicworld,if,forexample,thereisabilliardballsittingthereandnotmoving,onewillcertainlyknow
itbysimplylookingattheball.Ifitisinpitchdarkness,onewillnotknoweitheritspositionoritsvelocity.To
knowitspositionbylooking,photonsfromsomelightsourcemustbescatteredfromthebilliardballintothe
eyeballsofthepersondoingthelooking.Scatteringphotonsfromthebilliardballisnotgoingtochangeits
velocity.Becauseeventhoughthephotonshavemomentum,themassofamacroscopicbilliardballisalways
toolargeforittobemovedanymeasurableamountbythemomentumimpartedtoitbythephotons.Thus,one
canknowitspositionandvelocitysimultaneously.Whyisitthenonecannotspecifythepositionandvelocityof
anatomicorsubatomicparticlesimultaneously?
Aqualitativeappreciationoftheuncertaintyprinciplemightbegainedonthebasisofitsinterpretationbased
on the commutation relationships (2.11a) and (2.11b) of the corresponding measurement processes. Thus,
consider,forexample,insteadofabilliardball,atinyatomicorsubatomicparticle.Intheprocessofscattering
atleastonephotonfromtheparticletoaphotodetectorinordertomeasureitsposition,momentumwillbe
transferredfromthephotontotheparticle,theamountofwhichisnotnegligibleforatomicorsubatomic
particlesbutisuncertainanddependsupontheaccuracyofthepositionmeasurement.(Foramoreindepth
discussionofthisissue,see,forexample,Bohm(1951).Section5.11.)Subsequentmeasurementofthevelocity
oftheparticlewillthengivearesultthatisnotthesameasthatwhenthepositionoftheparticleisdetermined.
Thus, the position and the velocity of the atomic or subatomic particle cannot be specified precisely
simultaneously.Thisexamplegivesanintuitivebasisforunderstandingtheuncertaintyprincipleasembodiedin
Eq.(2.13)onthebasisofitssubtleconnection,throughEq.(2.12),withthecommutationpropertiesofthe
operatorsrepresentingthecorrespondingmeasurementprocesses.
Thebasiccommutationrelationships,(2.11a&b),betweenthecanonicalvariables,xandp
, and Heisenbergs uncertainty principle, (2.13), are both necessary conse quences of the basic
postulatethat,intheSchro dingerrepresentation,theoperatorsxandp
2.2Operators(Postulate2)17
Postulate2ineitherform,itispossibletodeterminewhatphysicalpropertiescanalwaysbemeasuredin
arbitraryorderandpossiblybespecifiedpreciselysimultaneouslyandwhichonescannot.
Eigenvaluesandeigenfunctions
Asstatedearlier,ingeneralanoperatoroperatingonanarbitrarystatefunctionwillchangeittoanotherstate
function.Itcanbeshownthat,associatedwitheachoperatorrepresentingaphysicallyobservableproperty,
thereisauniquesetofcharacteristicstatefunctionsthatwillnotchangewhenoperateduponbytheoperator.
Thesestatefunctionsarecalledtheeigenfunctionsofthisoperator.Applicationofsuchanoperatoroneach
ofitseigenfunctionsleadstoacharacteristicnumber,whichisarealnumber(noimaginarypart),multiplying
thiseigenfunction.Thecharacteristicnumbercorrespondingtoeacheigenfunctionoftheoperatoriscalledthe
eigenvaluecorrespondingtothiseigenfunction.Forexample,theeigenvalueequationwithdiscreteeigen
values: