Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Summary
Bhabha also takes Benedict Anderson to task for placing the modern
dreams of racism outside history altogether. If for Foucault race and blood
interfere with modern sexuality, for Anderson racism has its origins in historic
ideologies of class that belong to the aristocratic prehistory of the modern
nation. Race represents an archaic ahistorical moment outside the
modernity of the imagined community as Bhabha quotes Anderson that
nationalism thinks in historical destinies, while racism dreams of eternal
contaminations outside history. Foucaults spatial notion of the conceptual
contemporaneity of power as sexuality limits him from seeing the double and
over determined structure of race and sexuality that has a long history in
colonial societies; for Anderson the racism of colonial empires is part of an
archaic acting out, a dream text of a form of historical retroversion that
appeared to confirm on a global, modern stage outdated conceptions of
power and privilege. Bhabha asserts that Benedict Anderson and Foucault
both ignore the temporality of modernity, focus on the contemporaneous or
the homogeneous empty time.
Bhabha introduces the idea that we need to end the massive classifications
based on ethnic traits. He describes existence today as living on the
borderlines of the 'present'. Today's society is made up of hybrids of different
ethnic backgrounds and present social experiences. He asserts that we must
move to the "beyond" to understand this difference. This is the place where
the crossing over of time and cultural differences occurs and where new
signs of identity are formed and where the questions of cultural difference
would not be dismissed with a barely concealed racismas primitive tribal
instincts that afflict Irish Catholics in Belfast or Muslim fundamentalists in
Bradford.