Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
N. Ramachandran
Professor, Department of Architecture,
Periyar Maniammai University, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, India
S. Senthamil Kumar
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering,
Periyar Maniammai University, Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, India
ABSTRACT
In traditional buildings, solar passive techniques are adopted to achieve thermal comfort.
But most of the present day contemporary buildings forget and ignore the architectural
traditions. Contemporary design depends on mechanically controlled built environments in
order to achieve thermal comfort. This also increases the energy demand. Study of traditional
buildings is carried out worldwide to arrive out sustainable solutions for the design of new
buildings. To compare the thermal comfort in traditional and contemporary buildings a
detailed questionnaire survey is carried out in the present study. Traditional houses of about
100 years old and modern buildings of less than 20 years in Thanjavur region, Tamilnadu are
chosen for the survey. Survey results show that 88% of the occupants in the traditional
building feel comfortable air temperature as compared to only 54% of the occupants in
modern building. Similarly the subjective responses of other parameters humidity, airflow and
overall thermal comfort are also found to be much better in traditional buildings than the
modern buildings. This is mainly attributed that solar passive design incorporated in
traditional building plays a major role to achieve thermal comfort. Hence from the present
study it may be concluded that comfortable living environments can be created in modern
building if solar passive techniques are incorporated.
Key words: Modern buildings, Questionnaire survey, Solar passive design, Thermal comfort,
Traditional buildings.
Cite this Article: C.V. Subramanian, N. Ramachandran and S. Senthamil Kumar, Performance
Evaluation of Traditional and Modern Residential Buildings for Thermal Comfort by
Questionnaire Survey in Thanjavur. International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, 8(2), 2017, pp. 440451.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=2
1. INTRODUCTION
Building occupancy evaluation for thermal performance assessments are at the degree at which the
buildings modify the prevailing outdoor climate to create a comfortable indoor environment.
Contemporary architecture often forgets and ignores the architectural traditions. Achieving thermal
comfort is important for the general well-being, health and productivity of the occupants. Many solar
passive techniques like shape, orientation, fenestrations, window to wall ratio and materials contribute
comfortable environment to the traditional buildings which are lagging in modern buildings. But
contemporary designs depend on mechanically controlled built environments in order to achieve
thermal comfort. Solar passive design is a way of designing buildings that takes advantage of
prevailing climate and natural energy resources, to achieve a comfortable indoor environment thereby
minimizing energy need and reliance on mechanical system [1].
In traditional buildings, solar passive techniques adopted to achieve thermal comfort are studied
worldwide to arrive out sustainable solutions for the design of contemporary buildings [2-8]. In the
operation of the contemporary buildings, around 70% of the total energy is used for climate control
system-like ventilation, heating and cooling. Hence it is required to evaluate the indoor thermal
comfort and carryout detail research on solar passive architecture [9-13].
To validate the quantitative results, a questionnaire based field survey has been carried and
reported for Kerala, India and Accra, Ghana among the residents of the traditional and modern
residential buildings [14 - 16]. Survey on building occupancy evaluation for thermal comfort in
Thanjavur region, Tamilnadu has not been reported so far.
Tamilnadu is a state located in South India having warm and humid climate as per the
classifications of Bureau of Indian standards [17]. Due to the presence of high temperature and high
relative humidity during summer causes thermal discomfort inside the buildings designed improperly.
Hence, in the present work, to understand the effect of various thermal comfort parameters like
temperature, humidity and air movement, a questionnaire survey is conducted among the building
occupants of traditional and modern buildings in Thanjavur region. Occupants in the age group of 20-
60 with equal representation from both male and female were chosen and subjected to a questionnaire
survey during extreme summer season to assess their subjective response for Thermal comfort. A
comparative analysis of the survey results is carried to bring out how well the solar passive designs
and techniques incorporated in traditional buildings contribute for thermal comfort. The summary of
the experimental investigation already reported on Thanjavur region is also included in this paper [8]
for comparison with survey results.
The traditional houses of about 100 years old and more, built according to traditional methods and
principles were selected. The traditional houses in Thanjavur region have solar passive design
elements like courtyard, tiled roof and thick walls. Contemporary buildings less than 20 years old were
chosen for the survey. The modern buildings lack conscious effort in using solar passive design.
Modern buildings are constructed with thin walls, cement plastering and RCC roof. Glass is
extensively used in most of the buildings including glass paneled shutters. Micro level variations in
climate were not considered among the selected buildings.
Traditional Modern
40
35
Percentage of Votes
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Cold Cool Slightly Neutral Slightly Warm Hot
cool warm
Subjective response on Indoor temperature
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Very dry Moderately Slightly dry Neutral Slightly Moderately Very humid
dry humid humid
Air movement plays a vital role in warm humid climate. Distribution of subjective responses on
air movement is shown in Fig. 3. From the air movement study it is observed that 84% of occupants
voted within the central three categories for traditional buildings and only 72% of respondents voted
for the same in modern buildings. The distribution of votes are 14% for slightly still, 54% for
acceptable, 16% for slightly draughty in traditional buildings. In modern buildings 15% voted for
slightly still, 36 % for acceptable and 21% for slightly draughty. None of the occupants opted for very
still and very draughty in modern buildings. 1% of occupants voted in both categories for traditional
buildings. 6% voted for moderately still and 8% for moderately draughty among occupants of
traditional building and it is 19% and 10% respectively for modern buildings.
Traditional Modern
60
50
Percentage of Votes
40
30
20
10
0
Very still Moderately Slightly still Acceptable Slightly Moderately Very
still draughty draughty draughty
Traditional Modern
100
87 84
90 83
80 74 72
Percentage of Votes
70
60 54
50
40
30
20
10
0
Temperature Humidity Air flow
Central three categories
Traditional Modern
60
50
Percentage of votes
40
30
20
10
0
Very Uncomfortable Slightly Comfortable Very
Uncomfortable uncomfortable Comfortable
From Fig. 5 & Fig. 6, around 60% (57% comfortable and 3% very comfortable) of the residents of
the traditional residences responded for comfortable category while around 40% (39% slightly
uncomfortable and 1% uncomfortable) of them responded for uncomfortable category. In modern
residence 80% of the residents felt uncomfortable (49% slightly uncomfortable, 21% uncomfortable
and 10% very uncomfortable). Only 20% of them felt comfortable in the modern residences.
Traditional Modern
90
80
80
70
Percentage of Votes
60
60
50
40
40
30
20
20
10
0
Comfortable Uncomfortable
Subjective response on overall thermal comfort
Traditional Modern
70
60
Percentage of Votes
50
40
30
20
10
0
Fan Air cooler Air Conditioner Natural
(AC) ventilation
Mechanism used to overcome thermal discomfort
Alarming increase in usage of air conditioner to overcome uncomfortable situation will cause high
energy demand and decrease in conventional energy source. But traditional buildings of Thanjavur
region are effective in providing indoor thermal comfort by solar passive techniques. The results are in
agreement with the experimental investigation already done [8].
Traditional Modern
90
80
Percentage of Votes
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Courtyard Tiled roof Thick walls Natural Landscape
ventilation
Design elements present in the buildlings
Figure 9 Bioclimatic chart showing the readings during maximum temperature or maximum humidity for
different buildings [22].
The evaluation with bio climatic chart shows that traditional buildings in Thanjavur region provide
better thermal comfort as compared to modern buildings. During the study period in summer, the
indoor temperature of traditional building under investigation went up to 30.8 C with humidity of
60%. This lies near the comfort zone of the Bioclimatic chart as shown in Fig. 9, offering adequate
comfort since the air velocity maintained in the building is up to 0.4 m/s [22]. The indoor comfort
condition of traditional building is not affected even when the temperature becomes as low as 24 C
during night time with the increase in humidity (up to 84.1%).
In contemporary building, when the indoor temperature in summer is high up to 33.9 C, the
humidity is 63.6%. This does not lie in the comfort region of the bioclimatic chart as the temperature
inside the building is high and air velocity is negligible. At night times, even when the temperature
falls to 28.9 C it is found to be discomfort because of very high humidity up to 77.5% and absence of
air flow [8].
5. CONCLUSION
In the present study, questionnaire survey on subjective responses is carried out for traditional and
modern houses in Thanjavur region for various parameters of thermal comfort, rating scale of overall
thermal comfort, measures to retain thermal comfort and characteristic elements of the building.
The subjective responses provide useful indicators on suitable solar passive architectural design for
obtaining thermal comfort over environmental parameters comprising of temperature, humidity and air
flow. The survey results substantiates that traditional residential buildings of Thanjavur region are
more effective in providing comfortable thermal indoor environment as compared to modern
buildings. This is mainly due to the presence of solar passive designs in traditional buildings and
absence of such designs in the present day modern buildings.
Hence it is concluded that comfortable living environment can be created in modern buildings with
limited or no energy usage if it is designed with knowledge handed down by the traditional
architecture.
REFERENCES
[1] Torwong chenvidyakarn, Review Article: Passive design for Thermal comfort in hot humid
climates, Journal of Architectural planning research and studies,Vol 5. 2007.
[2] Lee K H., Han D W., Lim H J., Passive design principles and techniques for folk houses in Cheju
Island and Ullng Island of Korea, Energy and buildings, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 207-216.
[3] Borong, L., Study on the thermal performance of the Chinese traditional vernacular dwellings in
summer, Energy and Building, Vol. 36, 2004, pp. 73-79.
[4] Ooka R, Field study on sustainable indoor climate design of a Japanese traditional folk house in
cold climate area, Building and Environment, Vol. 37, 2002,pp. 319-329.
[5] Subramanian C.V., Ramachandran N., Senthamil kumar S., Performance evaluation of the designed
solar passive architecture incorporated residence in warm humid climate, International Journal of
Civil Engineering & Technology (IJCIET),Vol. 7 (6), 2016, pp. 523-535.
[6] Singh, MK., Mahapatra, S., Atreya, S.K., Thermal performance study and evaluation of comfort
temperatures in vernacular buildings of north east India, Buildings and Environment, Vol. 45,
2010, pp. 320-329.
[7] Prateek manke, Yogesh garg and Vinay m. Das , Establishing process for designing of energy
efficient buildings, International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology
(IJARET), Vol. 6(8), 2015, pp. 21-31.
[8] Subramanian, C.V., Ramachandran, N., Senthamil kumar, S., Comparative investigation of
Traditional, Modern and designed solar passive building for Thermal comfort in Thanjavur region,
International Journal of Innovation in Engineering and Technology (IJIET), Vol 7(2), 2016, pp.
283-291.
[9] Yeo, M.S., Yang, I.H., Kim,K.W., 2003, Historical changes and recent energy saving potential of
residential heating in Korea, Energy and Building, Vol. 35, pp. 715-727.
[10] Santamouris, M., Pavlou, K., Synneta, A., Niachou, K., Kolokotsa, D., Recent progress on passive
cooling techniques, Advanced technological developments to improve survivability levels in low-
income households, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 39 , 2007, pp. 859-866.
[11] Wong, N.H., Li, S., A Study of the effectiveness of passive climate control in naturally ventilated
residential buildings in Singapore, Building and Environment, Vol. 42, 2007, pp. 1395-1405.
[12] Kim, D.K., The natural environment control system of Korean traditional architecture: comparison
with Korean modern architecture, Building and Environment, Vol. 41, 2005, pp. 1905 1912.
[13] Energy consumption guide 19: Energy use in offices, Watford, UK: Energy efficient best practice
programme, BRE. Building research establishment, sustainable construction unit (BRESCU), 2000.
[14] Dili A.S., Naseer M.A., Zacharia Varghese T., Thermal comfort study of kerala traditional
residential buildings based on questionnaire survey among occupants of traditional and modern
buildings, Energy and Building, Vol. 42, 2010, pp. 2139 - 2150.
[15] Nicol.J.F., Thermal comfort - A Handbook for field studies towards an adaptive model, School of
Architecture, University of East London, London, 1993.
[16] Appah Dankyi James, Koranteng Christian, An assessment of thermal comfort in a warm and
humid school building at Accra Ghana, Pelagia research library, Advances in Applied science
research, Vol. 3(1), 2012, pp. 353 547.
[17] Bansal N.K. and G.Minke, Climate zones and rural housing in India, Germany:
kernforschungsanlage, Juelich, 1988.
[18] ASHRAE, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy, ANSI-ASHRAE standard 55-
2004, 2004.
[19] Nazhatulzalkis Jamaludin, Thermal comfort of residential building in Malaysia at different micro-
climates, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 170, 2015, pp. 613-623.
[20] Abel Tablada, Ana M.De la Pena, Frank De Troyer, Thermal comfort of Naturally ventilated
buildings in warm-humid climates: field survey, PLEA 22nd conference 2005, Beirut, Lebanon,
2005.
[21] Umayal Sundari AR., Neelamegam P. and Subramanian C.V., Drying Kinetics of Muscat Grapes
in a Solar Drier with Evacuated Tube Collector, International Journal of Engineering -Transactions
B:, Vol. 27(5), 2014, pp. 811-818.
[22] Koenigsberger OH, Ingersoll TG, Mayhew Alan and Szokolay SV., Manual of tropical housing and
building -climatic design, Orient Longman Private Limited,1975.
[23] Umayal Sundari AR., Neelamegam P. and Subramanian C.V., An experimental study and analysis
on solar drying of bitter gourd using an evacuated tube air collector in Thanjavur, Tamilnadu, India,
Conference papers in Energy, Hindawi publishing corporation, 2013, pp. 1-4.
[24] K. Christopher Gunasingh and G. Hemalatha, Impact of Sodium Silicate Pent hydrate as Phase
Change Material in Concrete Cubes for Enhancing the Thermal Comfort. International Journal of
Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(1), 2017, pp. 999 1007.
APPENDIX 1. QUESTIONNAIRE
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THERMAL COMFORT EVALUATION - TRADITIONAL
HOUSE
This survey is part of a study to ascertain the thermal comfort conditions of the Traditional houses in
Tamilnadu. The evaluation has to be done in a condition when you are not using any of the mechanical
devices (fan, cooler, A/C, etc.,) to improve or modify the thermal comfort of indoor environment and
while wearing normal clothing in summer.
II. Feedback on Thermal comfort parameters (without usage of fan, cooler, A/C, etc.,)
1. How would you explain the following indoor conditions of your traditional house in summer
season?
a) Indoor Temperature (please tick one)
Cold Cool Slightly cool Neutral Slightly warm Warm Hot
(-3) (-2) (-1) (0) (1) (2) (3)
2. What is your ranking for the overall thermal comfort of your house in summer season? (tick one)
Very Uncomfortable Slightly Comfortable Very
Uncomfortable uncomfortable Comfortable
2. Which of the following is/are available in your traditional building? (please tick)
Courtyard Tiled roof Thick walls Natural ventilation Landscape Any other
APPENDIX 2. QUESTIONNAIRE
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THERMAL COMFORT EVALUATION - MODERN HOUSE
This survey is part of a study to ascertain the thermal comfort conditions of the Modern houses in
Tamilnadu. The evaluation has to be done in a condition when you are not using any of the mechanical
devices (fan, cooler, A/C, etc.,) to improve or modify the thermal comfort of indoor environment and
while wearing normal clothing in summer.
II. Feedback on Thermal comfort parameters (without usage of fan, cooler, A/C, etc.,)
1. How would you explain the following indoor conditions of your traditional house in summer
season?
a) Indoor Temperature (please tick one)
Cold Cool Slightly cool Neutral Slightly warm Warm Hot
(-3) (-2) (-1) (0) (1) (2) (3)
2. What is your ranking for the overall thermal comfort of your house in summer season? (tick one)
Very Uncomfortable Slightly Comfortable Very
Uncomfortable uncomfortable Comfortable
2. Which of the following is/are available in your traditional building? (please tick)
Courtyard Tiled roof Thick walls Natural ventilation Landscape Any other