Chapter 000X Page 1

Jim,
.
AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
.
I am concerned about the various comments that were made by some people as to that they do not
recognise the constitution, British law, etc, while on the other hand claiming that the courts (which
are under the existing constitution) should acknowledge what is called the Aboriginal Lore, etc.
.
If any Aboriginal or for that any other person doesn’t accept British law (the constitution) then why
are they wasting the courts time to pursue land rights claims, seek compensation, etc?
It is diabolic that those who stake a claim against British law are the once who pursue British law to
seek compensation and land rights recognition, etc.
.
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I have made all along known that I go on the basis the constitution
(The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)) is a valid constitution. Those who
oppose this should then but out of the legal system and not pursue litigation about land rights,
compensation and whatever because they cannot have it both ways to accept the courts ruling if it
goes their way but do not accept a courts ruling if it doesn’t go their way.
.
By making any application before any court any Aboriginal or for that any other person accepts the
validity of the constitution and the States created within s.106 and so also the legal systems existing
therein.
.
This nonsense about not accepting the validity of the governments and the laws enacted by the
parliaments because of the British but accepting the courts ruling and laws where it is in the benefit
of Aboriginals simply is to me utter and sheer nonsense.
.
As I indicated before those who claim their rights and benefits under the laws then by this have
accepted the validity of the system. It doesn’t matter if it are Aboriginals, Chinese, Japanese, or
whatever as anyone who is willing to accept a ruling in his/her favour also must then accept a ruling
adverse to him/her.
.
There are many non-Aboriginals also on the bandwagon to supposedly support the Aboriginal cause
to somehow have the so called Aboriginal Lore accepted, etc, but you cannot achieve this if you
refuse to accept the current British system in Australia because without any British court (as after
all technically all Australians courts are) there will be no court to make any decision in favour of
any Aboriginal!
.
The same nonsense is purport rated by so many claiming it is “whitefella’s” against “blackfella’s”
to use their kind of slang. It never have been as such on a constitutional basis and neither as such in
a legal basis as even when the commonwealth unconstitutionally legislated “while only” voting it
never was “white” against “black” because we also has numerous other races included.
.
Les indicated that he was passing on my writings to Aboriginals in the Northern Territory
and in my view this is precisely the right thing to do. Not to divide as if there was “white”
against “black” because that is only asking for problems and the last thing we need is some internal
war! I just wish people stop their utter and sheer nonsense and accept that like it or not we do have a
constitution and we all need to work within this. If there is any person, regardless of race, considers
to be aggrieved then the courts are there to address these issues but we cannot have some kind of
system that if the court pronounced a decision in favour of a particular party then this party is

Chapter 000X Page 1

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-
61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com
 Chapter 000X Page 2

willing to recognise the validity of the decision but if the court was to make an adverse decision to
this party then somehow the laws are not valid.
.
Like it or not we all have to embrace the legal processes and work within it. We cannot have one
legal system for most Australians and another system for others who may or may not desire to
accept the courts decisions pending if it is adverse to them or not.
.
Let’s be very clear about it not every Aboriginal can have claims of being dispossessed! If there are
certain Aboriginals then they and only they should have the fullest support of all in the appropriate
manner but we do not want people claiming about being dispossessed and pursuing land rights
claims or whatever where they have no proven association with any land they are seeking to claim
but are merely doing so on the fact that they happen to look like Aboriginals. As I wrote about in
the past we had certain Aboriginal leaders claiming to be of the so called STOLEN GENERATION
only later to have been exposed as frauds as they were never taken from their parents as such but
rather their parents handed them over so they may have a better future.
.
Neither can we claim that all this rot of the past was directed just against Aboriginals because let’s
be frank who is really an Aboriginal? Many children who were removed were actually of half-caste
and so you cannot claim they were just Aboriginals as they also were of other races.
.
There are those who are writing using ongoing Aboriginal slang like “whitefella’s” but if someone
was to state “blackfella’s” then it would be deemed racial discrimination. Let’s be clear about it
there never was anything as just against Aboriginals as the federation was created upon the basis
that Aboriginals were equal to other Australians and specifically excluded from s.51(xxvi) so to
prevent them to be subject to any race legislation. It were the Aboriginals themselves who rightly or
wrongly supported the amendment in 1967 to have s.51(xxvi) amended to include them and you
cannot argue that it is not valid because they may have been conned but they do accept legislation
enacted within s.51(xxvi) when it is in their benefit. You cannot have the cake and eat it.
.
Any person, Aboriginal or otherwise, who has accepted his/her rights provided for under
constitutional provisions (including enacted legislation) being it for education, health, social
security, etc, by this must be deemed to have accepted the validity of the constitution. It doesn’t at
all mean that those aggrieved cannot seek assistance from the courts but they must accept the
validity of the courts and any ruling as otherwise they shouldn’t in the first place litigate in the
courts.
.
When I opposed compulsory voting I took on the Federal government and after a 5-uyear epic legal
battle comprehensively defeated the commonwealth on all constitutional issues that I raised in the
litigation. That is my view one should conduct one selves to act within the legal framework to
pursue matters and not that we have those “stirrers” who are on the one hand seeking the maximum
benefits under the constitution while opposing the validity of the constitution only for so far it
doesn’t serve their purpose.
.
As I indicated s.128 cannot be use to turn the Commonwealth of Australia into some republic or for
that monarchy and those who propose to do so would do better to learn what they are talking about
and put their brain in gear. And, even if by some other manner a republic or monarchy was created
(as the Commonwealth of Australia is not a monarchy but is under the British Crown but not being
a dominion but as a POLITICAL UNION) then all rot that is currently going on will be deemed to
be part of the new republic or monarchy and so the very people now having an argument may just

Chapter 000X Page 2

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-
61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com
 Chapter 000X Page 3

find that they vandalized any opportunity to ever seek to obtain the wrongs of the past, for so far
this is possible, to be corrected in some manner.
.
People can hold meetings as much as they like and waste their money on entry fees, donations, etc,
but they are only being gullible for those who use it to earn money out of them.
.
No one can ever claim that I charged a fee for addressing groups, etc, because I am not in it for the
money. I provided and still do information free of charge and people then can use it or not as they
may elect but there are far too many who are even using my past publications as their own and then
corrupt it and charging a fee for meetings upon the basis it cost them money to hold meeting, and
yet I never charged as such. The difference being I am not some vulture after the money of the
gullible but belief in JUSTICE.
.
People who charge for meetings often have a financial interest in trying to stir up others and then so
to say people are getting burned when they end up in court and left on their own to fight charges. I
have never been as such and deplore those who are targeting vulnerable people and deceive them as
such.
.
We should stop this rot about “whitefella’s” versus “blackfella’s” because in which group would
you slot in the non-whites and not Aboriginals and those who are of mixed races? Why would a
half-caste of Caucasian being deemed “black” and not “white”? The same with a half-caste
Aboriginal and Chinese, etc?
.
There are “white” looking Australians who nevertheless can be descendants of Aboriginals and let
therefore forget about this nonsense of “white” versus “black” but deal with all people as being
Australians!
.
Gerrit
.
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
.
11-7-2010

Chapter 000X Page 3

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, by fax 0011-
61-3-94577209 or E-mail INSPECTOR-RIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com