Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

B

Bb Samms oasis, but not the city itself. Dates given


for them in the hagiographic sources are
Khvja Muammad Bb Samms unreliable. This chain, constructed in the
(d. c. 7346/13346; 755/1354 is also ninth/fifteenth century in the circles claim-
given) was a Central Asian f of the ing spiritual descent from Bah al-Dn, is
Khvjagn tradition (the arqa-yi recorded first in the hagiographies devoted
Khvjagn, lit., way of masters, goes back to that figure. Earlier sources are much less
to Abd al-Khliq Ghijduwn, d. 575/ interested in silsila constructions and give
1179, and was the precursor of the Naqsh- other filiations. Thus, in a work devoted
bandiyya, the widespread f order, to the life and sayings of Al Rmtan,
whose eponymous founder was Bah his son Ibrhm is cited as his main suc-
al-Dn Naqshband, d. 791/1389). He was cessor, and Bb Samms is not even
born in Samms (other forms of the name mentioned, whereas later Naqshband
are also cited), a village situated between sources claim that Bb Samms was
Romitan and Varakhsha, on the western the sole successor to Rmtan. Likewise,
rim of the oasis of Bukhara (about twenty in the hagiographic accounts of the life
kilometres from Bukhara); his shrine is and sayings of Bah al-Dn, the latter is
located there. He is known especially as accepted as a (spiritual) son (Kshif,
a link in the chain of transmitters (silsila) Rashat, 1:74) by Bb Samms, and
that connects Bah al-Dn Naqshband to his training is entrusted to Amr Kull;
Abd al-Khliq-i Ghijduwn. This silsila for Amr Kull, the same formula, of
runs as follows: Bah al-Dn Amr being accepted as a (spiritual) son,
Kull Bb Samms Al Rmtan is used in a source devoted to him (Kshif,
Azzn Mamd Anjr-Faghnav Rashat, 1:76).
rif Rvgar Abd al-Khliq. All these This places Bb Samms within that
men came from villages in the Bukharan branch of the early Khwjagn who broke
26 bakhtvar khn

with the first pattern of succession, which Tehran 1977; al al-Dn b. Mubrak
was a lateral one (each of a given shaykhs (attrib.), Ans al-libn wa-uddat al-slikn, ed.
Ibrhm ar Ughl, Tehran 1371sh/1992;
close disciples taking leadership of the Shihb al-Dn, Maqmt-i Amr Kull, lith.,
community until that generation had died Bukhara 1328/1910, trans. O. M. Yastrebova
out) and favoured a filial one. At the in Mudrost sufiev (St Petersburg 2001),
same time, this branch adopted the prac- 28270.
tice of the vocal dhikr (ritual commemo- Studies
ration of God), whereas the other branch Hamid Algar, Bb Samms, EIr; Devin
maintained the silent dhikr as the only DeWeese, Khojagani origins and the cri-
valid form of commemorating God. It tique of Sufism. The rhetoric of communal
uniqueness in the Manqib of Khoja Al
has been argued that it was Bah al-Dn Azzn Rmtan, in Frederick de Jong and
who succeeded in bringing the various Bernd Radtke (eds.), Islamic mysticism contested.
branches of the Khvjagn tradition Thirteen centuries of controversies and polemics
several local spiritual communities (Leiden 1999), 492519; Devin DeWeese,
The legitimation of Bah ad-Dn Naqsh-
together into a larger organisation. band, Asiatische Studien/tudes Asiatiques 60/2
No writings, few sayings, and only (2006), 261305; Devin DeWeese, Succes-
a handful of anecdotes are attributed sion protocols and the early Khwajagani
to Bb Samms, and he is important schism in the Maslak al-rifn, JIS 22/1
(2011), 135; Jrgen Paul, Solitude within
chiefly because he is seen as a necessary society. Early Khwjagn attitudes toward
transmitter in the later silsila constructions spiritual and social life, Princeton Papers 15
for Bah al-Dn and as a means to bypass (2006), 13763; Necdet Tosun, Baheddn
Amr Kull in the chain of transmitters. Nakbend. Hayat, grleri, tarkati, Istanbul
2002; Necdet Tosun, Semms, TDVIA
There was a need to bypass Amr Kull (Istanbul 2009), 36:498bc.
in later silsila constructions because Kull
kept practising the vocal dhikr whereas Jrgen Paul
Bah al-Dn and his group did not. The
most important way to achieve this was
the claim that Bah al-Dn received Bakhtvar Khn
training directly from the spirit of Abd
al-Khliq. Bakhtvar Khn was a Kashmiri
Bb Samms can be seen as falling eunuch who entered the service of
in the four successors pattern; he is Awrangzb in 1065/1654. He served
reported to have had three successors in as a secretary and confidante assisting
addition to Amr Kull, one of whom was the princelater, the emperor lamgr
his son Khvja Mamd. (r. 10681118/16581707)in his mili-
tary and political endeavours. As a partisan
Bibliography of Awrangzb in the war to succeed Shh
Jhn (r. 103768/162758), he pursued
Sources Dr Shikh after the battle of Smgah
Muammad b. Nim al-Khwrazm
al-Arzang, Manqib-i Azzn, Tashkent, (1068/1658); served as whisk-bearer dur-
MS Institut Vostokovedeniia Akademii ing Awrangzbs second and more elabo-
Nauk Respubliki Uzbekistan (IVANRUz)-1, rate coronation, in 1069/1659; was titled
858/I (Osnovnoi fond); Al b. usayn Khn, in 1069/1659; and, received the
al-Wi al-Kshif, Rashat ayn al-ayt,
ed. Al Aghar Muniyn, 2 vols., imperial rank (manab) of 1000/150, in

S-ar putea să vă placă și