Sunteți pe pagina 1din 22

Microsoft Excel 16.

0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [LPP-Solver-Problem Par and 1-6.xlsx]Par-Inc Demosol
Report Created: 21-01-2017 14:44:18
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.032 Seconds.
Iterations: 2 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNeg

Objective Cell (Max)


Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$B$11 Maximize Total Profit Standard 19 7667.94172245

Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$B$10 Bags produced Standard 1 539.984249311
$C$10 Bags produced Deluxe 1 252.011025482

Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula
$B$14 Cutting and Dyeing Hours Used 630 $B$14<=$D$14
$B$15 Sewing Hours Used 480.000472521 $B$15<=$D$15
$B$16 Finishing Hours Used 708 $B$16<=$D$16
$B$17 Inspection and Packaging Hours Used 117.001181302 $B$17<=$D$17
ons are satisfied.

%, Assume NonNegative

Integer
Contin
Contin

Status Slack
Binding 0
Not Binding 119.9995275
Binding 0
Not Binding 17.9988187
Operation Standard Deluxe Time Available
Cutting and Dyeing 0.7 1 630
Sewing 0.5 0.83333 600
Finishing 1 0.6667 708
Inspection and Packaging 0.1 0.25 135
Profit per bag 0 0

Model Decision Variables


Standard Deluxe
Bags produced 539.9842493109 252.011 what needs to be optimised
Maximize Total Profit 0 SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Constraints Hours Used Hours available


Cutting and Dyeing 630 <= 630
Sewing 480.0004725207 <= 750
Finishing 708 <= 708
Inspection and Packaging 117.0011813017 <= 135
a. Revise profit of Deluxe to 18

b. Standard bag-$20 and Delxue is original $9

c. Sewing capacity increased to 750

100 Percent Sensitivity Rule


eeds to be optimised by changing a. Profit is revised to $11.50 and $8.25
J=TARGET VAR
b. 20 additional hours of Cutting and Dyeing tim
available hours of Finishing.
Subject to
constraints
nd Delxue is original $9

eased to 750

ity Rule
11.50 and $8.25

of Cutting and Dyeing time and 100 additional


Microsoft Excel 16.0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [LPP-Solver-Problem Par and 1-6.xlsx]M&D Chemicals
Report Created: 21-01-2017 15:07:37
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.016 Seconds.
Iterations: 3 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNeg

Objective Cell (Min)


Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$B$11 Maximize Total Profit Product A 5 800

Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$B$10 Products produced Product A 1 250
$C$10 Products produced Product B 1 100

Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula
$B$14 Processing time Hours Used 600 $B$14<=$D$14
$B$15 Total Production Hours Used 350 $B$15>=$D$15
$B$16 Demand for A Hours Used 250 $B$16>=$D$16
onditions are satisfied.

ance 1%, Assume NonNegative

Integer
Contin
Contin

Status Slack
Binding 0
Binding 0
Not Binding 125
Operation Product A Product B Requirement
Processing time 2 1 600
Total Production 1 1 350
Demand for A 1 125

Production Costs 0 0

Model Decision Variables


Product A Product B
Products produced 250 100 what needs to be optimise
Minimize Total Cost 0 SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Constraints Hours Used Hours available


Processing time 600 <= 600
Total Production 350 >= 350
Demand for A 250 >= 125
eeds to be optimised by changing
J=TARGET VAR

available
Subject to
constraints
Feed Component Std Enr Add
Ingrdt A
Ingrdt B
Ingrdt C
Mix
Cost per pound

Model Decision Variables


Std Enr Add
Products produced 1 1 1
Minimize Total Cost 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


Ingrdt A 0 0
Ingrdt B 0 0
Ingrdt C 0 0
Mix 0 0
Requirement

what needs to be optimised by changing


SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
DistributionChannel Marine Business Retail
Advertising budget
Salesforce availability
Production Level
Retail stores reqmt
Profit

Model Decision Variables


Marine Business Retail
Channel Mix 1 1 1
Maximise Profit 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


Advertising budget 0 0
Salesforce availability 0 0
Production Level 0 0
Retail stores reqmt 0 0
Direct Requirement

Direct
1 what needs to be optimised by changing
SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
Home Loans Personal L Auto Loans
New Funds
Min Home Loans
Personal Loan reqmt

Maximize Returns

Model Decision Variables


Home Loans Personal L Auto Loans
Products produced 1 1 1
Maximise Profit 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


New Funds 0 0
Min Home Loans 0 0
Personal Loan reqmt 0 0
Requirement

0 what needs to be optimised by changing


SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
S1 S2 D1 D2
SuperSaver Demand Forecast
Deluxe Demand Forecast
Business Demand Forecast
Available type 1
Available Type 2
Maximize

Model Decision Variables


S1 S2 D1 D2
Rooms 1 1 1 1
Maximise Profit 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


SuperSaver Demand Foreca 0 0
Deluxe Demand Forecast 0 0
Business Demand Forecast 0 0
Available type 1 0 0
Available Type 2 0 0
B2 Reqmt

B1
1 what needs to be optimised by changing
SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
Lisa David Sara Reqmt
Total Time
Lisa reqmt
Minimum Sara
Max Sara
Max Lisa
Minimize

Model Decision Variables


Lisa David Sara
Hours 1 1 1
Minimize 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


Total Time 0 0
Lisa reqmt 0 0
Minimum Sara 0 0
Max Sara 0 0
Max Lisa 0 0
what needs to be optimised by changing
SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
A B C D Supply
Avery 100 125 115 100 160
Baker 120 135 115 120 160
Campbell 155 150 140 130 160

MAX 57925

A B C D Supply
Avery 0 40 100 0 140 160
Baker 40 35 0 85 160 160
Campbell 140 0 0 0 140 140
180 75 100 85
LA Chicago Columbus Atlanta Newark Kansan cityDnver
Dallas

S-ar putea să vă placă și