Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
INTRODUCTION
FLOOR DESIGN
Bearer
Section Properties ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page F1
Member Capacities --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page F2
Spans -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page F5
Floor Joist
Section Properties -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page F10
Member Capacities ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page F10
Spans ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page F12
ROOF DESIGN
Section Properties --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page R2
Member Capacities -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page R3
Review of Truss Members ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page R7
Computer Input Loads ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page R8
COMPONENT FIXINGS
Top Bracket------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page C1
Stud Capacity --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page C2
Bottom Bracket ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page C4
Bearer / Stump Capacity ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page C5
Chemical Anchor Capacity----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page C8
Document Control
(Introduction) Page 1 of 5
Australian Owned and Made Modular Floor, Wall, Roof Truss System resistant to:
Cyclones, Earthquakes, Fire, Termites, Tornadoes
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this Design Calculation Manual is to describe the Force 10 Engineered Building
System to Designers, Engineers and approving Authorities. The information given in this manual
should be sufficient as a reference and guide to the design of buildings up to an ultimate wind
speed of C4 86 m/sec without additional information for compliance to wind loads as defined in the
Australian NCC and New Building Codes.
Standard plans and layout are available for use however non-standard designs may be achieved
by using the guidance and Tables in this Manual. All designs when submitted for approval to the
local authority must meet all the relevant performance requirements of the relevant NCC or
Australian, New Zealand (or International) Building Code.
The Force 10 Engineered Building System has been subjected to a through testing programme
to ensure that the section capacities are correct and are in accordance with the Australian and
New Zealand Standard Codes. The design information presented in the manual has been derived
from engineering calculations and/or from testing.
This design calculation manual refers to building elements which are constructed in accordance
with relevant building codes and standards. Where indicated, this manual must therefore be read in
conjunction with that standard or the Australian NCC (BCA) or the New Zealand Building Code
requirements.
Specific design will also be required for other elements such as strong backs, columns, beams,
verandas etc. Specific design calculations will need to be prepared by appropriately qualified
designers and a Design Certificate provided to cover each project.
The following information has been broken up into the various design elements of the system, ie.
Floor, Wall, Roof, Components and gives a typical design example to suit cyclonic conditions in
Australia.
Where testing has been used to define the design element, results have been calculated after
taking into account the variability of the structural units.
Where calculations have been undertaken, the standard design code used AS/NZS4600 : 2005.
The following information will be sufficient for a design engineer competent in structural analysis to
assess the system.
(Introduction) Page 2 of 5
Australian Owned and Made Modular Floor, Wall, Roof Truss System resistant to:
Cyclones, Earthquakes, Fire, Termites, Tornadoes
Roof Design
Roofs have been structurally designed to current Australian and New Zealand Standard Codes
over the lifetime of the Force 10 System.
Enclosed in this document is Design Calculations to AS/NZS4600: 2005 for an ultimate wind speed
of 60m/sec and for an 11.0 module span. Computer analysis was undertaken using Space Gass
10.72(a) and results included. Design Analysis indicates that Force 10 members are satisfactory in
combined loads.
The series of tests were undertaken on the standard Force 10 Panels and for a panel developed
for C4 Region D and the NCC Importance Level 4 (IPL4) in accordance with Standards Australia
AS1170.2 Wind Actions. This panel is referred to as the IPL4 panel and the same panel design
is used as a C4 panel (all regions). The results are summarised as follows:
These values are ultimate section capacities and are to be reduced by the appropriate section
capacities reduction factors of AS/NZS4600 Table 1.6.
The test results were for 2435 mm high panels and have been extrapolated to 2700 mm high by
the ratio squared and similarly for 3000 mm high. Based on assessments of this testing, the
following ultimate design capacities for the Force 10 panels can be summarized as follows:
(Introduction) Page 3 of 5
Australian Owned and Made Modular Floor, Wall, Roof Truss System resistant to:
Cyclones, Earthquakes, Fire, Termites, Tornadoes
In summary, Force 10 Panels can be used for all structures as nominated below for the Australian
NCC:
Panel Connections
Tensile test was a panel assembly which is roof bolt to panel to floor bearer to stump using the
Force 10 proprietary brackets. From this testing, the nominal tensile load (uplift) of the assembly is
45.3 kN. For a capacity reduction factor of 0.65 tensile section capacity is 29.5 kN.
(Introduction) Page 4 of 5
Australian Owned and Made Modular Floor, Wall, Roof Truss System resistant to:
Cyclones, Earthquakes, Fire, Termites, Tornadoes
Floor Design
Floors have been structurally designed to current standard codes over the lifetime of the structure.
In the Floor Design area are Design Calculations to AS/NZS4600: 2005. From these calculations
the Bearer / Joist Spans are calculated using 1.5 kPa Live Load, 2 kPa Live Load and 3 kPa Live
Load.
Footing Design
This is site specific and requires analysis of a Design Engineer and based on site specific
knowledge.
(Introduction) Page 5 of 5
Australian Owned and Made Modular Floor, Wall, Roof Truss System resistant to:
Cyclones, Earthquakes, Fire, Termites, Tornadoes
FLOOR DESIGN
BEARER
FLOOR JOIST
(Floor Design)
Australian Owned and Made Modular Floor, Wall, Roof Truss System resistant to:
Cyclones, Earthquakes, Fire, Termites, Tornadoes
Y
54 b=55
173
X X D=171 t=2.0
Y
54
Idealised
1083 x 2
I y = 2 = .42 x106 mm 3 ry = 19.3, rx = 65.5
12
17 169 x 2
3 3
I x full sec tion = 2 110 x 2 + 2 = 4.825 x106 mm 4
2 12
Z x = 55.78 x103 mm 3 A = 1124 ro = 68.3
a2I y 3
Iw = = 3.07 x109 J = WF t = 1500
4 3
d 1 171
= = 85.5
t 2
Ek v 2 x10 5 x5.34
=
fy 550
= 44.07
Ek v
& 1.415 = 62.35
fy
d1 .905 Ek v t 3
As > 62.35 Vr =
t d
5 3
.905 x 2 x10 x5.34 x 2
=
171
= 45.22kN Per Web
v Vv = (2x45.22).9
vVv=81.4kN
My
b =
Mo
M y = 450 x55.78 x10 3
= 25.1kNm
M o = C b Aro f oy f oz
C b = 1.0 A = 1124 ro = 68.3
2E
f oy = 2
l = 500 - Floor Joist Support
l
r
y
2 x 2 x10 5
= 2
500
= 2940
19
GJ 2 EI w
f oz = 1 +
Aro GJl 2
2
bM=22.58kNm
2 2
M* V*
+ 1 . 0
22 . 58 81 . 4
r l d
Rb = Ct 2 f y sin 1 C r 1 + C1 b 1 C w
t t t
Using Table 3.3.6.2(B)
C = 4, C r = .14, C1 = .35, C w = .02, w = .85
ri = 4.0, t = 2.0, l b = 37, d1 = 171, = 90 o
4 37 171
Rb = 4 x 2 2 x5501 .14 1 + .35 1 .02
2 2 2
= 8800(.8)(2.505)(.815)
= 14.37kN / Web
Rb = 28.745
Rb = .75 x 28.745
= 21.6
Rb=21.6kN
R* M *
0.82 + 1.32 (3.3.7(2)
21.6 22.58
OR R* M*
+ 1 .0
34.77 29.81
wult = 15.36kN/m
wser = 8.4kN/m
(3)
9
M * = 15.36 x
8
= 17.28kNm
3
V * = 15.36 x
2
= 23.0kN
2 2
17.28 23
+ = .66 < 1.0
22.58 81.4
23 17.28
= + = 1.24 > 1.0
34.77 29.81
M* V*
To Achieve 1.0 Try = 1 .0
29.81 34.77
* *
M = 29.81 .86V
wl 2 wl
ie. = 29.81 .86
8 2
15 . 36 15.36
l2 x = 29.81 .86 x l
8 2
= 1.92l 2 = 29.81 6.58l
OR 1.92l 2 + 6.58l 29.81 = 0
6.58 6.58 2 + 4 x1.92 x 29.81
l=
2 x1.92
6.58 + 16.5
=
3.84
= 2.58m
Max Span for 2m Load Both Sides = 2.58m
5 wl 4
(a) Deflection = 384 EI
5 x7.0 x 2740 4
=
384 x 2 x10 5 x 4.825 x10 6
Span
= 5.3mm =>
510
Span
For =
600
384 EI
l=3
600 x5 x7
l = 2603
. For Joists either side 4000, Max Span = 2603
(b) Note : For Joists 3000 either side
Span
=> Wsen = 5.25kN / m and for
600
384 EI
=> l = 3
600 x5 x5.25
= 2860 - Still less than 3 Mod
(c) Joists at 2000 either side
W = 3.5kN / m
384 EI
=l=3
600 x5 x3.5
= 3280 => 3 Modules
(d) Joist 1500 either side
W = 1.75 x1.5 = 2.625
384 EI
=l=3
600 x5 x 2.625
= 3610
Summary
Joist Spacing 4000 3000 2000 1500
Beam Span 2600 2860 3280 3610
However based on product use since 1988, the recommended values can be rounded up without
performance compromise
Performance Values
Joist Spacing 4000 3000 2000 1500
Beam Span 2500 3000 3500 4000
wult = 19.36kN/m
wser = 8.4kN/m
(3)
9
M * = 19.36 x
8
= 21.78kNm
3
V * = 19.36 x
2
= 29.0kN
2 2
21.78 29
+ = 1.06 > 1.0
22.58 81.4
32.67 21.78
= + = 1.67 > 1.0
34.77 29.81
M* V*
To Achieve 1.0 Try = 1 .0
29.81 34.77
* *
M = 29.81 .86V
wl 2 wl
ie. = 29.81 .86
8 2
19 . 36 19.36
l2 x = 29.81 .86 x l
8 2
= 2.42l 2 = 29.81 8.32l
OR 2.42l 2 + 8.32l 29.81 = 0
8.32 8.32 2 + 4 x 2.42 x 29.81
l=
2 x 2.42
8.32 + 18.915
=
4.84
= 2.18m
Max Span for 2m Load Both Sides = 2.18m
5 wl 4
a. Deflection = 384 EI
5 x8.4 x 2740 4
=
384 x 2 x10 5 x 4.825 x10 6
Span
= 6.4mm =>
430
b. For Joists either side 4000, Max Span = 2380
Note : For Joists 3000 either side
Span
=> Wsen = 6.3kN / m and for
600
384 EI
=> l = 3
600 x5 x6.3
= 2700 - Still less than 3 Mod
c.Joists at 2000 either side
W = 4.2kN / m
384 EI
=l=3
600 x5 x 4.2
= 3092 => 3 Modules
d. Joist 1500 either side
W = 2.1x1.5 = 3.15kN / m
384 EI
=l=3
600 x5 x3.15
= 3500
Summary
Joist Spacing 4000 3000 2000 1500
Beam Span 2380 2700 3000 3500
However based on product use since 1988, the recommended values can be rounded up without
performance compromise
Performance Values
Joist Spacing 4000 3000 2000 1500
Beam Span 2500 3000 3000 4000
5 wl 4
(a) Deflection = 384 EI
5 x11.2 x 2000 4
=
384 x 2 x10 5 x 4.825 x10 6
Span
= 2.4mm =>
800
(b) For Joists 3000 either side
Span
=> Wsen = 8.4kN / m and for
600
384 EI
=> l = 3
600 x5 x8.4
= 2450 - Still less than 3 Mod
(c) Joists at 2000 either side
W = 5.6kN / m
384 EI
=l=3
600 x5 x5.6
= 2800 => 3 Modules
(d) Joist 1500 either side
W = 4.2kN / m
384 EI
=l=3
600 x5 x 4.2
= 3090
Summary
Joist Spacing 4000 3000 2000 1500
Beam Span 2000 2450 2800 3090
However based on product use since 1988, the recommended values can be rounded up without
performance compromise
Performance Values
Joist Spacing 4000 3000 2000 1500
Beam Span 2000 2500 3000 3000
d 1 95 E kv 2 x10 5 x5.34
= = 79.17, = = 46.22
t 1 .2 fy 500
E kv
1.415 = 65.40
fy
d1 E kv .905 Ek v t 3
Where > 1.415 , Vv =
t fy d1
Vv = 17.58kN
vVv = .9 x17.58
= 15.823kN
vVv = 15.82kN
My
b =
Mo
2 ECb dI xc
M y = 500mPa Mo =
2l 2
Ix
C b = 1.0 I xc = d = 95 l = 3000
2
2 x 2 x10 5 x1.0 x95 x.815 x10 6
= Mo =
2 x3000 2
= 8.5kNm
M y = 500 x34.32 x10 3 = 17.16
17.16
b =
8.5
= 1.42 > 1.336 (Clause 3.3.3.2(4)
1
Mc = M y 2
b
17.16 x0.495
8.5kNm
b M c = 0.9 x8.5
= 7.65
bMo=7.65kNm
Spans
Design Loads
(2) Serviceability
w = .7 + .7 x 2 ( g + s q )
= 2.1kPa
=> 1.05kN / m
5 wl 4
=
384 EI
5 x1.05 x3000 4
=
384 x 2 x10 5 x1.63 x10 6
= 3.397 mm
Span Span
ie. = < OK
880 600
Span R 5wl4
* NOTE FOR ie. =
600 600 384EI
384EI
l=5
600x5x1.05
= 3900 ie. Close enough to 4.0 mod
AS3623 APPENDIX D
CALCULATE Pd
Eb I b
kb =
l3
2 x10 5 x 4.825 x10 6
=
3500 3
= 22.51
3
Ec t p l
kc =
12S 3
3000 x19 3 x3500
=
12 x500 3
= 48.0
k
b = 2.13
kc
FIGURE D1 => Pd = .8
Pd = .8 x1000 = 800 N
Pl 3
=
48EI
800 x3500 3
=
48 x 2 x10 5 x 4.825 x10 6
= .74mm > 1.0 OK
Unit Impulse Section D3
NATURAL FREQUENCY
Eb I b
Kx =
S
2 x10 x 4.825 x106
5
=
500
= 1930 x106
3
E f tr
Ky =
12
3000 x19 3
=
12
= 1.715 x10 6
K x >> K y OK TO USE FORMULAE D3.2
Kx
F=
2 wl 4
DL - 30kg / m 2
LL - .3kPa ie. 30kg / m 2
1930 x10 6 x10 3
= f =
2 60 x3.5 4
= 23
Testing was undertaken in 2011 at the James Cook University Cyclone Testing Station. Testing
was as follows:
From these reports the following recommended ultimate strength design wind capacities were
obtained.
From Testing:
These values are ultimate and need to have a capacity reduction factor applied => = 0.9 =>
Value for 2435 High panels.
To determine the bending capacity of other height panels by using previous testing results that
have been undertaken since 1988 the bending capacity is equivalent to the inverse height ratio
squared - therefore for other height panels:
A review of the Wind Load Codes (AS1170 and AS4055) gives the following net pressure for
design. Comparing these values to the assessed capacities will give the following tabulated
assessment.
Note: Domestic structures (Class 1 and 10) can use Cpn of 1.35 where as Class 2 9 structures
must use Cpn of 2.0.
Standard Panel:
Panel size Wind Classification
Class 1 and 10 Classes 2- 9
2435 N6/C4 N6/C3
2700 N6/C3* N5/C2*
3000 N6/C3 N5/C2
C4 /IPL4 Panel:
Panel size Wind Classification
Class 1 and 10 Classes 2- 9
2435 N6/C4 N6/C4
2700 N6/C4 N6/C4
3000 N6/C3 N5/C2*
* Update November 2012
From the James Cook University Cyclone Testing Station a recommended value for racking was
set at 21.4 kN for 3 panels normally 7.1 kN per panel.
It is recommended that the standard panel be further limited by bolt bearing loads.
C => df = 16 = 13.3
t 1.2
From previous testing on 2700 high panels (ASTM E 73 95) section 9 was determined as an
appropriate test for the comparable load of a Force 10 wall panel.
Test Results
Series Description Comments
No. Failure Allowable
Retest 1 1 Panel 80.2 60.2
Failure. Panel continued to bend
CET 2 1 Panel 84.1 63.1 without increase in load.
4999/1 3 1 Panel 83.8 62.8 Local failure of studs at fixing
brackets and sheeting.
Average 62.0
Note: (a) Retest Compression Test on single panel to ASTM E72-95 Section 9
(b) Allowable loads factored by 0.5
Test Results
Series Description Comments
No. Failure Allowable
1 1 Panel 30.1 22.58
3 2 1 Panel 37.0 27.75 Panel bolt rotating.
Possible retest to simulate real site
3 1 Panel 36.2 27.15 conditions.
Average 25.8
1 1 Panel 28.2 21.15
4 2 1 Panel 37.7 28.28 Elongation of holes in studs -
3 1 Panel 36.4 27.30 representative of real site conditions.
Average 25.58
Note: (a) Series 3 Compression Test on single panel to ASTM E72-95 Section 9
(b) Series 4 Tensile Test on single panel to ASTM E72-95 Section 10
(c) Allowable loads factored by 0.75
The following recommended values have been determined by averaging test results.
Results
Series Test No. Description Comments
Failure Allowable
1 1 Panel 78.0 58.5
Failure. Panel continued to
6 2 1 Panel 74.7 56.03 bend without increased load.
3 1 Panel 75.0 56.25 Local failure of studs at fixing
brackets and sheeting
Average 57.0
1 1 Panel 39.3 29.47
1-4 2 1 Panel 44.4 33.3 Elongation of holes in studs -
representative of real site
3 1 Panel 44.7 33.5 conditions
Average 32.1
Note: (a) Series 6 - Compression Test on single panel to ASTM E72-95 Section 9
(b) Series 4 - Tensile Values Base on Racking.
(c) Allowable loads Factored by 0.75.
The following recommended values have been determined by averaging test results.
The James Cook University Cyclone Testing Station (Test Report T837) undertook a single test on
a bolt assembly. From this test the breaking load was 55.9 kN. Applying a reduction factor of 0.81
the nominal tensile capacity of 45.3 kN is appropriate. The relevant capacity factor for the
assembly is 0.65 giving the following:
N* Cmx M x*
+ (3.5.1(1))
c N c b M bx nx 1.0
N c = 62kN M bx = 6.79kPa
C mx = 0.85 C = .85 b = .9
N*
nx = 1
Ne
2 EI b
Ne =
(l eb )2
E From Tests P = 81kN = 1.2mm A = 2.6.1000mm 2 I = 2700
Pl 81x10 3 x 2700
E= =
A 12000 x1.2
= 15000MPa
OR
N* M*
+ 1 .0
52.7 N*
7.191
307
N* Cmx M x*
+ (3.5.1(1))
c N c b M bx nx 1.0
N c = 62kN M bx = 5.43kPa
C mx = 0.85 C = .85 b = .9
N*
nx = 1
Ne
2 EI b
Ne =
(l eb )2
E From Tests P = 81kN = 1.2mm A = 2.6.1000mm 2 I = 2700
Pl 81x10 3 x 2700
E= =
A 12000 x1.2
= 15000MPa
OR
N* M*
+ 1 .0
52.7 N*
5.751
307
N* Cmx M x*
+ 1 (3.5.1(1))
c N c b M bx nx
N c = 57.0kN M bx = 4.44kPa
C mx = 0.85 c = .85 b = .9
N*
nx = 1
Nc
2 EI b
Nc =
(l eb )2
E = FROM TESTS P = 68kN = .99 A = 2 x6 x1000 l = 3000
Pl 68000 x3000
E= =
A 12000 x.99
3
= 17171mm
2
2 65
I b = 2 Ay = 2 x6000 x + 3
2
6
= 15.12 x10
2 x17171x15.12 x10 6
Ne =
3000 2
= 285kN
N*
nx = 1
285
N* .85M *
Eqn 3.5.1(1) +
.85 x57 N*
.9 x 4.441
285
N* M*
+
OR 48.5 N*
4.701
285
ROOF DESIGN
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 280
Ix = 173.7x10 3
b 2t
Iw =
6
( )
4c 3 6ac 2 + 3a 2 c + a 2 b m 2 Ixx
a 2b 2t 1 c 2c 3
m= +
Ix 4 2b 3a 2 b
40 2 65 2 1.2 1 31 2 313
= +
173.7 10 3 4 2 65 3 40 2 65
m = 13.9mm
65 2 1.2
Iw =
6
( )
4 313 6 40 312 + 3 40 2 31 + 40 2 65 (13.9 2 ) 173.7 10 3
36 a
m= F= =1
F+6 b
3 40
=
7
= 17.14
a 2 b 3 1 .2 2 + 3
Iw =
12 1 + 6
40 2 40 3 1.2 5
=
12 7
= 7.31 10 6
Mc
Fc =
Zf
M c depends on b
My
b =
Mo
M y = Fy Z y = 500 x 4.89 x10 3
= 2.445 x10 6 kNm
M o = C b Aro ( Foy Foz )
C b can always be 1.0 A = 280 ro = 38.7
2E
Foy = 2
(l y = .75l = 1600 )
l y
r
y
2E
= 2
1600
24.9
= 478MPa
2E
Fox = 2
1600
26
= 520
GJ 2 EI w
Foz = 2
1+
Aro GJl 2
80000 x75 2 x 2 x10 5 x8.56 x10 7
= 1 +
280 x1498 80000 x75 x1600 2
= 172MPa
M o = 1.0 x 280 x38.7 172 x 478
= 3.11kNm
My
b =
Mo
2.445
=
3.11
= 0.887
102 b
M c = 1.11M y 1 3.3.32(4)
36
7.86
= 1.11x 2.4451
36
= 2.12kNm
2.12 x10 6
fc =
4.89 x10 3
= 434MPa
M o = Z c Fc
= 434 x 4.89 x10 3
M b = 2.12kNm
b M b = .9 x 2.12
= 1.91kNm
bMb=1.91kNm
ry
c =
Foc
Fy = 550
1 F + F
Foc = ox
(Fox + Foz )2 4Fox Foz
2
oz
2
rx
= 1 + Fox = 520
ro
= 1.45 Foz = 172
c Nc = 35.7kN
N * = t N T
t = .9
N T = Ay Fy
= 280 x500 = 140kN
or .85k T An FN
k T = 1.0 An = 280 Fu = Fy = 550
N T = .85 x 280 x500
= 119kN
N * = .9 x119
= 107kN
t N T = 107 kN
SUMMARY
b M b = 1.91kNm
c N c = 35.7 kN
t N t = 107kN
N * Cmx M *
+ 1 .0
c N c b M b nx
M
Cm = .6 .4 1
M2
M 1 = .35, M 2 = .75 Computer Case 1
.35
= .6 + .4 = .79 (Double Curvature)
.75
N
nx = 1 x
Ne
2 EI y
Ne =
(l )2
2 Ex173.7 x103
=
1600 2
= 134kN
N*
N *
b M o 1
134
N* .79 M *
+ 1 .0
34 N*
2.21 +
134
General Formula
N* M*
+ 1.0
34 N *
2.421
134
Nc=34kN
Reactions
Uplift = 19.1kN
WL 0o
WL 90o (one truss) Trusses 1000 CTS
COMPONENT FIXINGS
(Component Fixings)
Australian Owned and Made Modular Floor, Wall, Roof Truss System resistant to:
Cyclones, Earthquakes, Fire, Termites, Tornadoes
A. Top Bracket
= 86.4 or 56.3kN *
= .8 f uf = 400 As = 157
N tfx = .8 x 400 x157
= 50.24kN *
V * w = Vw
Vw = .6 f uw t t k r
f uw = 410 t t = 4.24 k r = 1.0 = .6
= Vw* = (.6 x 410 x 4.24).6
= .626kN / mm
l = 32mm Vw* = 20.03kN *
Top Bracket N t* = 20 kN
B. Stud Material
36 6
Flange, b = = 25.0
t 1 .2
64 12
Web, b = = 43.3
t 1 .2
Effective widths (AS4600 Clause 2.2.1.2)
fx
=
f cr
2
k 2 E t
f CR = 2
( )
12 1 v b
N * Ag f y or (.85k t An Fu )
= .9 Ag = 163 An = 163 (18 x1.2 ) = 141mm 2
f y = 500 f u = 550 k t = 1 .0
N t* = .9 x.85 x122 x550
= 51.3
or
N t* = .9 x.163 x500 = 73.35
N t* 51.3kN
N * c N s or c N c
500
c = = 1.657 Eqn 3.4.1(5)
182
( )
f n = .877 2 f y Eqn 3.4.1(3)
= .319 x500 = 159
c N c = .85 x141x159
= 19.06kN
Vb* = Vb
Cd f tf u
16
= .6 C = 4 .1 = 2.667
1.2
(Washers Built in) Table 5.3.4.2( A) = 1.0
t = 1.2 f u = 550
*
V = .6 x 2.667 x16 x1.2 x500
b
Vbx 16.99 kN
Bottom Bracket
40 x.8 Material
N t* Ag f y
= .9 Ag = 25 x8 = 200 f y = 300
= 54kN
N t* 54 kN
Bolting to Bearer
V f* V f ( .62 f uf kr ( Ac n + nxAo ))
2M10 Bolts
= .8 f uf = 400 n =1 Ac = 78
N tf* N tf (AS4100 9.3.2.2)
nx = 0
= .8 f uf = 400 As = 60
VF = .8 x.62 x 400 x78
N tf* .8 x 400 x60
= 15.5kN / Bolt
19.2kN / Bolt 38.4kN for 2 Bolts
VF* 31kN
D. Bearer/ Stump Capacity- JCU CTS Load path Test Report TS837
NOTE: Once bearer flange bends material goes into tension and bolt tear out occurs. Using AS/NZS4600 (5.3.4.2).
From this testing, the nominal tensile load (uplift) of the assembly is 45.3 kN.
For a capacity reduction factor of 0.65 tensile section capacity is 29.5 kN.
Consider 3 cases:
a. M12 /N20 /55 From Ramset Chem Std Limit State Capacities per Anchor (Tension and Shear)
N* V*
+ = 1.2 FromBrochu re
Nur Vur
N* V*
+ = 1 . 2 55 mm Edge distance
19 . 85 5 . 08
b. M12 /N20 /125 From Ramset Chem Std Limit State Capacities per Anchor (Tension and Shear)
N* V*
+ = 1.2 125mm Edge distance
19.85 14.1
c. M16 /N25 /125 From Ramset Chem Std Limit State Capacities per Anchor (Tension and Shear)
N* V*
+ = 1.2 125mm Edge distance M16
30.97 27.6
a. Design Loads are as per cyclonic loads as per AS4055 and can be combined using net pressure
coefficients as
Wall Cpn = 1.35 and Roof Cpn= 1.6
The method for determining maximum uplift is to consider wall loads and put into interaction
formula to determine maximum uplift load
N* V*
+ = 1.2
Nur Vur
V*
N * (1.2 = (1.2 )Nur
Vur
b. V* =can be calculated for C1, C2, C3, C4 conditions and based on 3.0m Panel
PanelHt
V * = Cpn
2
= 1.35qzx1.5
or = 2.025qz
THIS CAN BE TABULATED
NCC WIND CATEGORY qz kPa V* = 2.025qz
C1 1.5 3.038
C2 2.233 4.522
C3 3.286 6.654
C4 4.438 8.99
V*
N * (1.2 = (1.2 )Nur
Vur
b C1 3.038 19.54
C2 4.522 17.45
C3 6.654 14.45
C4 8.99 11.16
c C1 3.038 33.75*
C2 4.522 32.1*
C3 6.654 29.7*
C4 8.99 26.92