Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The analysis of qualitative research involves aiming to uncover and / or understand the big picture - by
using the data to describe the phenomenon and what this means. Both qualitative and quantitative analysis
involves labelling and coding all of the data in order that similarities and differences can be recognised.
Responses from even an unstructured qualitative interview can be entered into a computer in order for it to
be coded, counted and analysed. The qualitative researcher, however, has no system for pre-coding,
therefore a method of identifying and labelling or coding data needs to be developed that is bespoke for
each research. - which is called content analysis.
Content analysis can be used when qualitative data has been collected through:
1. Interviews
2. Focus groups
3. Observation
4. Documentary analysis
Content analysis is '...a procedure for the categorisation of verbal or behavioural data, for purposes of
classification, summarisation and tabulation.'
1. Basic level or the manifest level: a descriptive account of the data i.e. this is what was said, but no
comments or theories as to why or how
2. Higher level or latent level of analysis: a more interpretive analysis that is concerned with the
response as well as what may have been inferred or implied
Content analysis involves coding and classifying data, also referred to as categorising and indexing and the
aim of context analysis is to make sense of the data collected and to highlight the important messages,
features or findings.
1. Researchers can either take notes during their interviews (transcribing) or observations, or take a
recording
3. In note taking there is an increased risk of the researcher being more subjective
4. The entire interview/observation is recorded, which gives a better, more holistic picture of
what is going on
5. The participants may feel less observed if the tape recorded is used in a a discreet way
6. During analysis, the researcher has the opportunity to go back over material
4. Transcribing:
1. Transcribing the interview involves taking notes of the interview...it is the full 'script' of the
interview and the aim is to take a full written version of the interview
2. Transcribing an interview is very time consuming, with an estimated time ratio of 5:1 (i.e. 5
hours of transcribing a one hour interview)
2 Tape analysis can be used, which is a combination on the two and involves the researcher taking
notes from the recording
4 Good quality transcribing relies on skills beyond just taking notes and there is often space for
subjectivity
1. When planning the presentation of qualitative data, consider that the data are:
1. Subjective
2. Interpretative
3. Descriptive
4. Holistic
5. Copious
2. It may be suggested that the researcher base the structure of the presentation of the research
around the categories or themes that have emerged
3. The themes or categories may be presented as sections with relevant sub-sections
4. Quotes can be used to demonstrate and or inform or support findings, but it is recommended that
the researcher consider the reliability and validity of each quote
5. Consideration may also be given to whether or not qualitative data can be represented in a
quantitative form (i.e. 6 out of 10 people...)
Introduction of the research, objectives and how achieved, methodology and main findings.
Literature Review
Review any previous work to do with the topic of research. Include a general discussion of how it relates to
research - i.e. supports, contests, proves or disproves.
Method
Discuss how the results were achieved and provide explanations of how data was
gathered/collated/generated and how the data was analysed. Discuss any methodological problems and
their solutions and or effects on the research.
Remember:
2. keep notes of what you did, why you did it and what happened
Provide the interpretation, presentation and/or discussion of the results. Also, any comparisons with the
results of previous research or effects of methods used on the data obtained.
Conclusion
http://libweb.surrey.ac.uk/library/skills/Introduction%20to%20Research%20and
%20Managing%20Information%20Leicester/page_76.htm
Collect Data
Before you select an appropiate data collection method, there are three main
factors that should be carefully considered.
You must carefully consider what you want to learn from this evaluation
project and which methods and tools will provide you with the most valid and
meaningful data.
Your research questions should help drive the selection of the
appropriate data collection method(s) and tools.
Another thing to consider when selecting the appropriate method is the
audience you are trying to reach.
o Funders and a board of directors will be interested in very
different types of data than program staff.
o Thus, it is important that you consider the audience when
selecting your data collection methods to ensure that the data will satisfy the
needs of your primary audience, as well as enable you to present meaningful
results to other types of audiences (OSullivan, 2004).
The data collection method appropriate for your evaluation design will
differ greatly depending on whether you want or need to use quantitative data,
qualitative data, or both (a mixed methods approach).
Additionally, consider your evaluation project timeline and determine
what can be reasonably completed within the time constraints. Some data
collection methods require a greater time investment than others.
Number 3: Carefully consider the availability of resources for the project (e.g.,
the participant pool for selecting your sample, the budget for the project, and
the staff available to assist on the project).
Some methods are much more costly and require more participants,
staff, and expertise than others.
The table below provides a quick summary of the things you should consider
when deciding on which data collection methods to use for your evaluation
project.
EVALUATION PURPOSE
What are your research questions? Which methods will help you best
answer them and provide the most reliable and valid data?
Who is your primary audience? What types of data will make the most
sense and be the most useful to them?
EVALUATION DESIGN
AVAILABILITY OF RESOURCES
What is your evaluation budget? How much can you allocate for data
collection?
What is the availability of staff for this project? What are their areas of
expertise? Will you need to hire external staff to support the project?
How large is your participant pool? What sample size will you need?