Vaccinating babies without

vaccinating babies
A baby makes copies of maternal immune cells it acquires through
mother's milk
Date:
October 7, 2016
Source:
University of California - Riverside
Summary:
Scientists have long understood that mother's milk provides immune
protection against some infectious agents through the transfer of antibodies, a
process referred to as "passive immunity." A research team now shows that
mother's milk also contributes to the development of the baby's own immune
system by a process the team calls "maternal educational immunity."
FULL STORY
The researchers in this study asked the question of whether or not you can
vaccinate the mother through the breastfeeding process.
Credit: Deymos.HR / Fotolia

Scientists have long understood that mother's milk provides immune protection against
some infectious agents through the transfer of antibodies, a process referred to as "passive
immunity." A research team at the University of California, Riverside now shows that
mother's milk also contributes to the development of the baby's own immune system by a
process the team calls "maternal educational immunity."

Specific maternal immune cells in the milk cross the wall of the baby's intestine to enter an
immune organ called the thymus. Once there, they "educate" developing cells to attack the
same infectious organisms to which the mother has been exposed.

The research, which used mouse foster nursing models, has important implications for
vaccinating newborn babies. The researchers show that you can vaccinate the mother and
this results in vaccination of the baby through this process.

"It's another way moms provide immune information to their babies," said Ameae Walker,
a professor of biomedical sciences in the UC Riverside School of Medicine, who led the
research. "It's as though the mother is saying, 'Look what I have seen in the environment
that you need to be immune to as well.' The replicas -- the copies of the maternal immune
cells that the baby makes -- will provide immunity to the baby for life."

Research results appear in the Sept. 15 issue of the Journal of Immunology

 "Some vaccines are not safe to give a newborn baby and others just don't work very well in
newborns," Walker said. "If we can instead vaccinate mom or boost her vaccination shortly
before she becomes pregnant, transferred immune cells during breast feeding will ensure
that the baby is protected early on. While our work has used mouse models because we can
study the process in detail this way, we do know that milk cells cross into human babies as
well."

One of the infectious agents the research team studied was the organism that causes
tuberculosis (TB) -- a disease that is a huge problem in many countries of the world and
getting worse because of the development of antibiotic-resistant strains. Generally,
babies directly vaccinated against TB do not have a very good response: while the
vaccination prevents some of the worst complications, it does not prevent the respiratory
part of the disease -- what was once called consumption.

"We hope that by vaccinating the mother, who will eventually nurse the baby, we will
improve infant immunity against TB," Walker said. "It's like vaccinating the baby without
actually vaccinating the baby. In some instances, our work has shown that immunity
against TB is far more effective if acquired through the milk than if acquired through direct
vaccination of the baby. Of course, clinical trials will need to be conducted to test whether
this is the case in humans."

How many cells get passed from mother to child depends a lot on how exposed the mother
was to an infection. If she gets repeatedly exposed to an infection, her immune response
would be boosted, and more cells would be passed on to the baby.

According to Walker, the passing of both antibodies and cells through the milk of wet
nurses likely contributed to the survival of royal babies in times past.

"Wet nurses were usually from a lower social echelon," she explained, "and were
likely exposed to more infectious agents. They had to have very robust immune
systems to survive, and transfer of antibodies and cells through their milk
probably contributed greatly to the survival of royal babies. What the research is
telling us is that a baby would likely gain from nursing by multiple women with
different immune backgrounds. Not too long ago in most cultures, if a baby cried
a woman would pick it up and nurse it; most women were pregnant or lactating.
Now, socially, we would think that rather peculiar -- to nurse someone else's
baby. But is the change in how society thinks about this issue the best for the
baby's health?.
Story Source:Materials provided by University of California - Riverside
 Robert Kennedy, Jr. is right
about vaccines: A medically
induced holocaust is now upon
us
July 24, 2016

At a recent screening of the powerful new documentary film trace Amounts, which exposes
the scientific connection between mercury in vaccines and autism, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
warned an audience of supportive viewers that vaccines are essentially poison vials causing
a holocaust in our country.

The nephew of former U.S. president John F. Kennedy, RFK Jr. attended the screening
in solidarity with California parents who are fighting to stop Senate Bill 277 from
eliminating their freedom as Californians to exempt their children from mandatory
vaccinations. Speaking to the crowd, Kennedy emphasized the proven dangers of vaccines.

They can put anything they want in that vaccine and they have no accountability for
it, stated Kennedy about the vaccine industry, which ironically maintains its own
exclusive and unconstitutional exemption from legal liability for vaccines that injure and
kill children.

Trace Amounts helped kill anti-freedom vaccine exemption

elimination bill in Oregon

Both entering and leaving the stage to exuberant standing ovations, Kennedy lauded

Trace Amounts for helping persuade lawmakers in Oregon to scrap a bill similar to
Californias SB 277 that would have eliminated personal vaccine exemptions in the Beaver
State.

He also empathized with parents of vaccine-injured children, who often have no support
from the legal system, and sometimes even from their friends and family members, in
addressing the damage caused by vaccine quackery.
They get the shot, that night they have a fever of a hundred and three, they go to
sleep, and three months later their brain is gone, lamented Kennedy about how
vaccine injuries progress. This is a holocaust, what this is doing to our country.

Not a single invited politician shows up to Trace

Amounts screening

California lawmakers were reportedly also invited to the

Trace Amounts screening where Kennedy spoke, with three rows specially cordoned off for
their convenient viewing. But according to The Sacramento Bee, not a single lawmaker
showed up except for a handful of random staffers. No bother, though, as the film was still
shown, and the crowd invigorated to take a unified stand for medical freedom.

89.3 KPCC is now reporting that the proposed legislation SB 277 would unconstitutionally
deprive unvaccinated children from receiving an adequate education by preventing them
from attending public school. Its supporters, however, are planning to reintroduce it once
again in the coming days.

Vaccines are a scam, and the governments revolving door

with the vaccine industry proves it has no business trying
to pass anti-exemption laws

As far as the idea of eliminating vaccine exemptions, it doesnt take a rocket scientist to
realize that those trying to push anti-exemption legislation

work for or are being paid off by the vaccine industry.

The former head of the CDC, Julie Gerberding, is now the head of the Merck
Vaccine Division, wrote one commenter at The Sacramento Bee concerning this issue.
The government is having a dirty little affair with the drug industry.

They share ownership of patents. They created the unconstitutional Vaccine Court that
usurps our 7th Amendment and shields drug manufacturers from liability. The phony court
has no judge, no jury and no justice for most people. They cherry pick cases to keep
liability down and lie about the real number of vaccine injuries, yet they have still paid out
about 3 billion dollars for the injuries they will admit to.

Check out this vaccine debate that aired on PBS Hawaii, in which the shows
producers and hosts failed to mention its sponsorship from Merck, Pfizer and various
other vaccine manufacturers:
 Health Check: should kids
be given antibiotics in their
first year?
August 22, 2016 1.46pm AEST
Two-thirds of children have already received antibiotics by the time they are
one year old. from www.shutterstock.com.au

Author

1. Penelope Bryant

Consultant in Paediatric Infectious Diseases and General Paediatrics, Murdoch Childrens

Research Institute

Disclosure statement

Penelope Bryant does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any
company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant
affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.

Two-thirds of children have already received antibiotics by the time they are one year old.
Antibiotic use is increasing in Australia, which directly affects the development of
antibiotic resistance. This is now at crisis levels, meaning some infections are becoming
untreatable.

So if you have a ten-month-old baby, what do you need to know? What do you need to ask
your GP about the benefits and risks of antibiotics?

Many doctors think parents come to them seeking a prescription, but parents increasingly
want to have the pros and cons explained so they can share in the decision-making about
whether or not their child needs antibiotics.
The pros

Antibiotics can be life-saving. Before antibiotics were developed and first used in the
1940s, the infant death rate in the developed world was about one in ten and the most
common cause was infection. This has dramatically reduced over the past 70 years. While
not all of this is because of antibiotics (sanitation and immunisation have also been
important), the ability to treat infections effectively has saved millions of lives.

Some infections need antibiotics because they are caused by bacteria and the infection will
only get worse if not treated. Examples of serious infections that need antibiotics under one
year of age are meningitis, pneumonia, bloodstream infection and urinary infection.

The problem is, it is often difficult to differentiate bacterial from viral infection in young
babies, especially those under three months of age, and to identify those at risk of serious
bacterial infection. In those situations antibiotics are often started empirically to be safe,
then stopped if no bacterial infection is found.

Antibiotics are also used in children to prevent the spread of some bacterial infections, such
as whooping cough. However, most serious bacterial infections are not transmitted from
one person having the infection to another person in close contact. This includes meningitis,
urinary infection and even pneumonia.

Other infections are caused by viruses, so antibiotics are ineffective for treatment or to
prevent spread. Under the age of one year, common viral infections include most
respiratory infections for example, ear, throat and chest infections. Treating viral
infections with antibiotics results in none of the benefits and only the disadvantages.

The cons

In addition to minor disadvantages such as inconvenience and cost, the major

disadvantages lie in the risks of antibiotic use. These can be divided into short, medium
and long-term risks.

The short-term risks are immediate side-effects such as diarrhoea, vomiting, rash and, more
seriously, anaphylaxis (severe allergy). Most of these will resolve themselves without
treatment, but some can be life-threatening.

The medium-term risks are the development or acquiring of resistant organisms. Antibiotic
overuse has been associated with increases in MRSA, a resistant bacteria that commonly
causes skin infections and occasionally more serious infections such as bone or
bloodstream infections in children.

The recent concern has been resistant gastrointestinal bacteria because these can cause
rapid and severe infections and there is no reliable way of removing them from the gut. We
are running out of antibiotics to treat these types of infections.

Many of the major drug companies are focusing their research and development on
medicines other than antibiotics, so there are few on the horizon. To try to treat very
resistant bacteria, a few old antibiotics are being used again, some of which have
significant side-effects such as damage to the kidneys.
Resistant organisms are also a long-term risk because they can be carried by children for a
very long time and be spread within the family. However, other potential long-term risks
for child health are only just being realised.

Over the last couple of years there has been great interest in the entirety of bacteria living
in the gut known as the microbiome.

Antibiotics have been shown to affect the childhood microbiome. Similar changes have
been found in the microbiome of children with allergy and obesity two of the biggest
childhood issues in developed countries. While this link is still being researched, this is
another reason to limit our antibiotic use.

There are several ways to cut down on antibiotics in children under the age of one: not
using antibiotics for viral infections, delaying starting antibiotics for some infections such
as ear infections to see if they get better on their own, and using a short course of
antibiotics where it has been shown to be safe instead of traditional longer courses.

So how do you tell the difference between a bacterial and a viral infection in your ten-
month-old child?

While some symptoms such as a runny nose make a virus more likely, parents should not
feel they are being asked to tell the difference. They should seek advice from their local
doctor, but, importantly, have a conversation about whether their child needs antibiotics.

Antibiotics are a precious resource. To ensure we preserve them for when they are
really needed, both now and for future generations, all of us are responsible for
asking the question: Does my child really need antibiotics?
 Breastfeeding within hour of
birth provides babys first
vaccine, says UNICEF

Sumi Madhi a volunteer on child feeding, nutrition and care interacts with mothers in
Kudada, India. Photo: UNICEF/Prashanth Vishwanathan
29 July 2016 The United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF) warned today that
some 77 million of the worlds newborns or 1 in 2 are not breastfed within the first
hour of birth, depriving them of essential nutrients and antibodies and thus exposing
them to an increased risk of death.

According to the agency, delaying breastfeeding by two to 23 hours after birth increases
the risk of dying in the first 28 days of life by 40 per cent. Delaying it by 24 hours or more
increases that risk to 80 per cent.

Early breastfeeding can make the difference between life and death, France Bgin,
UNICEF Senior Nutrition Adviser, said today in a press release.

If all babies are fed nothing but breastmilk from the moment they are born until
they are six months old, over 800,000 lives would be saved every year, she added.

Breastmilk is a babys first vaccine, the first and best protection they have against illness
and disease. Putting the baby to the breast also provides them with the essential
nutrients, antibodies and skin-to-skin contact with their mother that protects them
from disease.

A delay for this critical first contact not only decreases the newborns chances of
survival, it limits milk supply and reduces the chances of exclusive breastfeeding.

UNICEF has presented this information against the backdrop of the upcoming World
Breastfeeding Week, which is celebrated annually from 1 to 7 August in over 170 countries
to promote breastfeeding and improve infant nutrition

In Uzbekistan, a woman holds her newborn baby to her chest. Photo: UNICEF/Giacomo
Pirozzi

However, UNICEFs data has shown that progress in getting more newborns breastfed
within the first hour of life has been slow over the past 15 years.

Particularly concerning is the situation in sub-Saharan Africa, where under-five mortality

rates are the highest worldwide; early breastfeeding rates increased by just 10 percentage
points since 2000 in East and Southern Africa, and remained unchanged in West and
Central Africa.
Even in South Asia, where the rates of early breastfeeding initiation tripled in 15 years,
from 16 per cent in 2000 to 45 per cent in 2015, the increase is far from enough: 21 million
newborns still wait too long before they are breastfed.

UNICEF has also found that that women are not getting the help they need to start
breastfeeding immediately after birth even when a doctor, nurse of midwife is assisting
their delivery. For instance, In the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia, women who
deliver with a skilled birth attendant are less likely to initiate breastfeeding in the first hour
of life, compared to women who deliver with unskilled attendants or relatives.

Additionally, feeding babies other liquids or foods is another reason early breastfeeding is
delayed. In many countries, it is customary to feed a baby infant formula, cows milk or
sugar water in the first three days of life. Almost half of all newborns are fed these liquids.

When babies are given less nutritious alternatives to breastmilk, they breastfeed less often,
making it harder for mothers to start and continue breastfeeding, said the agency.
Globally, only 43 per cent of infants under six months old are exclusively breastfed, it
added.

Babies who are not breastfed at all are 14 times more likely to die than those who are fed
only breastmilk.

But any amount of breastmilk reduces a childs risk of death. Babies who received no
breastmilk at all are seven times more likely to die from infections than those who received
at least some breastmilk in their first six months of life.

To Vaccinate, or Not to
Vaccinate The Most
 Important Decision Parents Will
Ever Make
March 31, 2016 at 10:18 pm

The Weston A. Price Foundation claims whether or not to vaccinate your child is
perhaps the most important decision you will ever make as a parent, so please do
your research

Want to protect your child from:

Autism
ADHD
Tantrums and Rage
Paralysis
Lifelong Migraines
Infertility
Kidney Disease
Allergies
Eczema
Asthma
Seizures
Diabetes
Learning Disabilities
Speech Delay
High Pitched Screaming
 Autoimmune Disease
Cancer
Death

???

DONT VACCINATE them!!! says the Weston A. Price Foundation.

The foundation, known for its politically incorrect nutrition research, has produced
volumes of research and articles related to vaccine damage and ineffectiveness, but this
article sums it up the best with a list of myths and truths and a long list of citations to
back up each claim:

MYTH: Vaccines prevent disease

TRUTH: Many diseases such as polio and whooping cough (pertussis) are CAUSED
by vaccines.

* For example, the number of infants receiving three or more doses of the pertussis vaccine
rose from 61 percent to 96 percent between 1991 and 2012. The outbreak of the pertussis
virus increased 10-fold over the same period.

* Vaccines also contribute to CANCER by not allowing the immune system to

exercise itself, suppessing symptoms, and allowing a build-up of debris in the
body that a virus may have carried out, says medical doctor and WAP co-
founder Tom Cowan:

Whenever we have a normal infection like chicken pox, two arms of our immune system get
activated. First is the humoral immune response, or antibody-based response in the B
cells, which make antibodies to remember what happened. [This is the part vaccines
activate]. Second is a cell-mediated activation, where the white blood cells chew up the
invader and spit it out through fever, mucus, rash, achiness and sweatingall those things
we call being sick. [This is the part vaccines bypass and deactivate].

A vaccine is a specific attempt to activate a humoral responseantibodiesand to

deactivate the cell-mediated response. Why do I say that? If you get sick with fever, rash,
mucus, after you had a vaccine, then that would be a bad vaccine. No one would want that
vaccine. The whole point of a vaccine is to deactivate the cell-mediated response so you
dont feel sick, but to activate the humoral response.

This is exactly the same immune situation you see with cancer and auto-immune disease.
The cell-mediated response is the only way your body expels microorganisms and foreign
proteins, and that response gets shut down with vaccinations. Everyone who is vaccinated
ends up with an over-stimulated humoral antibody system and an under-stimulated cell-
mediated system. Add to that the use of fever-suppressing drugs like aspirin and Tylenol, as
well as antibiotics that kill the bacteria in our guts, and we have a recipe for cancer.
The incidence of cancer has skyrocketed with the introduction of vaccines and with the
suppression of the acute sick response. Unlike the primitive man who accepts everything in
nature and in the body as a natural process, the civilized man tries to suppress natural
processes; he is afraid of them, or thinks they serve no purpose, and cancer is the result.

MYTH: High vaccine rates create herd immunity

TRUTH: Herd immunity is a result of permanent immunity, which is only achieved
by natural infection

* According to another WAP article, when a baby becomes infected with a foreign
pathogen, his immune system responds through a sophisticated web of interlocking
reactions that can produce lifelong immunity to naturally acquired childhood illnesses.
These layers of defense systems exist, in part, to keep invading microbes and viruses from
taking hold in the deeper systems and organs of the body.

But vaccines are injected directly into the bloodstream, bypassing the natural
immune response. This deprives the body of the ability to naturally develop life-long
immunity to normal childhood illnesses like measles, mumps and chicken pox. Mass
vaccination is a man-made attempt to remove the natural infection response from
human development and replace it with a series of artificially imposed infections and
immune responses determined by the doctors vaccination schedule.

MYTH: Only by vaccinating every child can we protect all children

from disease
TRUTH: Vaccinated children spread viruses for months after
vaccination, prolonging the life of the virus

MYTH: Reactions to vaccines are rare

TRUTH: Serious, lifelong, disabling reactions to vaccines are common

According to VAERS, the governments own Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System,
there have been nearly half a million adverse reactions reported since 1990.

The former head of the FDA has admitted only about 1 percent of of serious adverse
events are reported, so there have probably been closer to 50 MILLION serious adverse
reactions to vaccines in the last 25 years!! Reported reactions include:

* Over 4000 deaths

* Almost 8000 life-threatening reactions
* Almost 8000 permanent disabilities
* Over 170,000 ER visits immediately after vaccination
* Almost 30,000 hospitalizations
MYTH: Vaccines dont cause AUTISM.
TRUTH: There are over 100 studies, many of them peer reviewed, linking vaccines to
Autism.

Additionally, asthma is found in only .2 percent of unvaccinated children compared to 15

percent of vaccinated children.

MYTH: The amount of aluminum and mercury in vaccines is insignificant

TRUTH: The amount of aluminum and mercury in vaccines is
considered extremely toxic when ingested, and injection of these
materials makes them harder to eliminate
*ALUMINUM: A fully vaccinated 18-month old baby has received 5000
mcg of aluminum. The allowable maximum per day for intravenous
feeding for healthy baby is 18 mcg. There are also 500 mcg of
aluminum in each dose of the new Gardasil vaccine. The amount of
aluminum needed by our bodies? Zero. The number of studies proving
safety of injecting aluminum into infants? Zero.
*MERCURY: The amount of mercury in liquid waste considered toxic by
the EPA? 200 parts per billion. The amount of mercury in thimerisol-
free vaccines? 2000 ppb. Some infant flu shots contain 25,000 ppb
and the multi-dose flu shots given to pregnant women contain 50,000
ppb. All thats necessary to kill neuroblastoma cells? .5 ppm
MYTH: The pharmaceutical industry creates vaccines for the common
good
TRUTH: Vaccines are a huge money maker for the pharmaceutical
industry

* Revenue from vaccines in 2013 alone was $24 BILLION and is projected to be $100
BILLION by 2025.

* This only accounts for direct revenue from vaccines. The amount of revenue generated
for the medical and pharmaceutical industries to fix damages they caused remains
untold.

Let your food be your medicine

Childhood diseases are either mild or non-existent when parents practice the kind of good
nutrition that we advocate. Diets rich in vitamins A and C can protect children against
disease much better than vaccinations, and with side effects that are good, never harmful.
Public health policy should be aimed at accurate information about nutrition, not the
promotion of vaccinations that actually suppress the immune system and often have tragic
side effects, WAP president Sally Fallon writes.

If you must vaccinate, WAP recommends the following guidelines:

Wait until the child is at least two years old.

Do not give more than one vaccination at a time.
Never vaccinate when the child is sick.
 Be sure that the vaccines are thimerosal-free.
Supplement the child with extra cod liver oil, vitamin C and B12 before and after each
shot.

Put your child to bed and keep him quiet for at least 24 hours after a shot.
Obtain a medical exemption if the child has had a bad reaction to a vaccination before or
if there is a personal or family history of vaccine reactions, convulsions or neurological
disorders, severe allergies and/or immune system disorders.

Vaccines, Vaccine Injury, & My

Perspective as a Doctor & Mom
By Dr. Rachael Ross / July 01, 2016

Ive ordered thousands of vaccines in my career as a physician. Until recently I had never
considered vaccine injury as more than folklore. Weeks ago I never wouldve believed a
story about vaccine injured triplets.so the past few weeks have been difficult. I have
struggled to make sense of all that I have seen and learned. I met a mother of triplets the
other weekend, a very attractive white woman with years added onto her face and her
smile. She recalled to me the day her triplets were born. She and her then husband were
ecstatic that she was able to carry them for 36 weeks.

At the time, mom was so happy that they were inside of her long enough to mature, they
were born perfectly healthy. I can totally relate since I am now twelve weeks
post0partum. I had very similar worries carrying my little princess. Moms eyes dropped
though as I gave her a hearty smile of excitement. The same day that her triplets were
given their six-month check-up and vaccines, was the same day that all three of her kids
checked out. She said it was as if someone replaced her children with new ones. They
unlearned all they knewregressed and screamed for days. I stood there motionless and
speechless. She didnt want my pity, nor my tears, she just wanted me to know.

Im a new mom, a sister, an aunt, a cousin, a friend, and a family medicine

physician. Im from a small town called

Gary, Indiana. As a matter of fact, I practice medicine about two blocks away from the
house that I along-with my eight brothers and sisters grew up in. My dad bought the house
in the 60s, after he met my mom. They both migrated to the Midwest to escape the blatant
racial tension of the deep south, and the rest is history.

In our small town the emergency room is named after my dad for all the great medical care
he has provided through the years. During the financial boom he even donated money to
build part of it Hes a pretty special guy; we both can sit and gush about each other for
hours at a time. Ive always been a Daddys girl.

I came back home to practice medicine in our small town after spending eight years in
Nashville, TN. I did my undergraduate work at Vanderbilt University. After graduation I
went to medical school at Meharry Medical College, my Dads alma matar, with my two
sisters Ruth and Rebekkah.

Our family-run clinic is sometimes my pride and joy, and other times the bane of my
existence lol. My brother Nathaniel is the director (he says hes going to miss me being
pregnant because I was much more pleasant). My mom Ruthie is the manager (she expects
us to wear our white coats even when the AC is out). My Dad, the smartest and most
charming doctor Ive ever met, is 86 and he still sees patients a few times a week. We also
have a wonderful doctor named Shelly Sandifer in our clinic. She came to work with us
after my sister Rebekkah passed away trying to have a child of her own. Dr. Sandifer has a
lovely Bajan/British accent, a great sense of humor, and the patients love her. We practice
community medicine every single day.

We treat families at our clinic. Sometimes I dont have to ask patients much about their
family history. I treat their aunts, uncles, parents, and sometimes even their
grandparentsits the best feeling in the world. Our patients trust us to take care of them,
and that is something that we all take very personally. When we say, our family, treating
your family we absolutely mean it.

We all took an oath to first and foremost Do No Harm. Its been difficult. Throughout
my tenure as a physician, I have watched while our academy has pushed certain medication
that we find years later has been causing more harm than goodthat hurts. less diabetes.
Autism in particular was 1 in 500 in the late seventies and it has now skyrocketed to 1 in
50. Why so many? Why so soon?

I am so sorry that I didnt know that the government has paid out $3billion to
families injured by vaccines through the VICP (Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program). As a matter of fact, I assumed that all vaccines were very very safe. They have
to be because we give them to everyones kids, right?!?? I am so sorry that I didnt realize
that there are tens of thousands of families on a list that have never received compensation
because they couldnt 100% prove that the vaccine created an injury (even though many of
them can pinpoint the day and time that their babies lights dimmed).

And until recently, I had never heard of a CDC scientist/whistleblower named Dr. William
Thompson (note, I cant link to a story because even the article written in Forbes has been
removed online). Dr Thompson was brave enough to come forward because his
conscience was killing him. I feel like such an ignorant ASS to say the least.

Dr. Thompson revealed that a study conducted at the CDC showed a 236% increase in the
rate of autism in African-American boys who received the MMR vaccine before the age of
36 months. He states that an internal decision was made to change the study results to
demonstrate that there was no increased riskand he feels really bad about all the lives he
ruined.

The documentary Vaxxed plays a percentage of the four hours of voice recordings between
the whistleblower/Dr. Thompson and another scientist. All of this would be impossible to
believe without those recorded phone conversations.

Of course I am Black mom, sister, aunt, cousin, and friend. As a Black physician, with a
mostly Black patient base, I am very very concerned and very sorry. But I am also
concerned as a person that loves all people and children regardless of race. What does this
information about one vaccine on one group of children infer about all vaccines and all
groups of children?

As a mom of a new tiny precious being and a doctor of many, I am left with so many
questions: Should vaccines be delayed? Are any vaccines safe? If so, which ones? Are
there more vaccine-injured victims that we even know about? Should genetic testing be
conducted on all children before we assume that they can tolerate all of those vaccines?

And my most important question: Why wont Congress subpoena Dr. Thompson so that we
can really really know the truth about this particular vaccine.

I have to thank Del Bigtree for taking the time to show me the data that I was inadvertently
pretending not to see, and I really have to thank Dr. Thompson. Without this information,
we would never have known, and it all wouldve just been written off as mishmash of
conspiracy theories.

With what I now know, I cannot support mandatory vaccines for children. Some kids
respond well to vaccines, but others do not. How can we be sure who will and who will
not? Should we really sacrifice one for many? Parents have to have the right to choose!
Parents have to make their own informed decisions. Parents deserve access to this
information which has been buried so deep that even I, a practicing physician, hadnt been
aware of.

I APOLOGIZE FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART TO ANY CHILDREN AND PARENTS

THAT I HAVE UNKNOWINGLY HARMED . I HAD NO IDEA .

PLEASE ASK QUESTIONS AND MAKE THE TIME TO GO SEE THE DOCUMENTARY
VAXXED. FORM YOUR OWN OPINIONS, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH , AND THEN TALK
TO YOUR PHYSICIAN . DEMAND TO HEAR FROM DR. THOMPSON , PASS THIS
INFORMATION ALONG TO YOUR LOVED ONES, AND START THESE CONVERSATIONS .
WE ALL DESERVE ANSWERS, AND THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO GET ANY .

People keep asking me if Im scared to speak about this. My realest fear is that we will
continue to assume that these moms are making this stuff up.

Sincerely,

Rachael L Ross, M.D., PhD

 CDC Advises Delayed
Breastfeeding To Boost Vaccine
Efficacy
by Kristen Michaelis

Ten researchers from the CDCs National Centers for Immunization and Respiratory
Disease (NCIRD) released a paper arguing that because the immune-boosting effects of
breastmilk inhibit the effects of the live oral rotavirus vaccine, nursing mothers should
delay breastfeeding their infants.

This, dear readers, is the kind of convoluted logic that permeates the pharmaceutical
industry. To be fair, the paper does not recommend that mothers stop breastfeeding, merely
that they delay nursing at the time that the vaccine is administered. It also says that other
avenues for boosting the vaccines efficacy should be explored.
Honestly, I dont care how nuanced their recommendation is. Do they not realize what they
have stumbled upon? In demonstrating that breastmilk counters the live vaccine, theyve
shown that breastmilk counters the virus.

A live vaccine contains a weakened form of the virus that causes the disease. The idea is
that by presenting the weakened virus to your body, your immune system will develop an
immune response to the virus sufficient to help you fight off a more virulent attack of the
virus later. In other words, when your body is fighting off the live virus, it is effectively
fighting off the virus itself, just in smaller quantities.

If breastmilks immune-boosting properties fight-off the live vaccine, then that means
that breastmilk is fighting off the virus itself (just in smaller quantities).

Yet instead of recommending that the best way to fight this disease in infants is to
encourage mothers to breastfeed, theyre recommending that mothers refrain from
breastfeeding so that the vaccine can work!

Im troubled by the underlying assumptions these researchers are making. Theyre

assuming, for example, that the vaccine should be used regardless of its efficacy. Theyre
assuming that the vaccine is better for the baby than breastfeeding. Theyre assuming that
the vaccine is safe.

Or, perhaps theyre not assuming any of those things. They are single-minded scientists
after all. Their sole goal in this paper seems to simply be to measure the inhibitory effects
of breast milk on the vaccine. They compared the breastmilk from mothers in India, South
Korea, Vietnam, and the U.S. Indian mothers had the most potent breastmilk in fighting the
vaccine, while U.S. moms had the weakest.

(I wonder if thats because of our poor diets of overly-processed, industrialized food?)

I think its interesting to note that the researchers arent asking about whats best for the
baby. The question they have in mind is quite focused: just how much does breastmilk
neutralize the vaccine?

Arguably, its a win for nursing mothers everywhere since it proves just how effective
breastmilk can be!

And yet, these researchers didnt stop there. They took their snazzy results and had the
audacity to call them a negative effect of breastfeeding.

Clearly, they have one goal in mind: to sell more vaccines.

And therein lies the rub. The pharmaceutical industry could care less about actual health
and wellness. After all, if you are healthy, they dont make any money off of you. It is in
their financial best interests for you to be perpetually sick.

I doubt that these researchers sat in their break room clad in black leather, sipping spiked
coffee sporting evil grins as they plotted about how to take over the world. Most likely,
theyre family folk feeling quite proud about the fact that they are developing vaccines to
use in poor, undeveloped countries.
And yet despite their noble intentions, they cant see how their assumptions influenced
their recommendations. For if they were truly all about the health of the baby, theyd look
at their findings and recommend that more women breastfeed. Or theyd look at their
findings and ask why Indian breastmilk is so much more effective than American
breastmilk, then start creating studies to unpack all the implications of that.

But who would fund those kinds of studies? Surely not the drug companies who are
creating and selling vaccines? Surely not the universities who are also funded by grants
from those same drug companies? Surely not the U.S. government which also receives
large sums of money (as well as employees) from those same drug companies?

Nobody would fund those kinds of studies. (And thats why theyre not done.)

Its been said that good health makes a lot of sense, but it doesnt make a lot of dollars.

Too true, that. Too true.

Beware of Antibiotics in
Breastfed Babies
by Rita Brhel on June 25, 2016

The next time your breastfed or recently weaned baby gets an ear infection, talk to his
health care provider about not being so quick to prescribe antibiotics if possiblebecause
while antibiotics may provide quick relief for the short-term, the research doesnt bode well
in the long-term.

A Finnish study, published June 13 in JAMA Pediatrics, has found a rather disturbing
association between antibiotic use in breastfed babies, or babies within 4 months of their
weaning, and their risk of more infections and obesity in the future.

Of the 226 Finnish children studied, 97% were breastfed for at least 1 month and on
average for 8 months. Each month of breastfeeding reduced the average number of post-
weaning antibiotic courses that child required.

But more importantly, I think, babies breastfed 0-6 months without any antibiotic use as
well as babies breastfed 8-16 months with antibiotic use both had fewer populations of the
good bacteria, Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia, compared with babies breastfed for
longer duration (8-16 months) without antibiotic use.

From what it appears, antibiotics negate some of the benefits of breastfeeding even
with babies who are breastfed exclusively and for longer duration.

It all comes down to the gut microbiome the microscopic ecosystem going on in our
babys intestines that not only determines how we metabolize our food but also fortifies our
bodys immunity.
You read that right: A huge part of our immune system depends on the specific mix of
microbes colonizing our gut.

And where do we get our gut microbial mix? There are different factors affecting our
unique blend everyones gut microbiome is different, just like our fingerprints but the
microbes that make up our individual mix are introduced during vaginal childbirth and
breastfeeding.

Or, lack thereof Cesarean births and formula-only feeding dont introduce much of a
microbial diversity, but that low diversity does affect how a babys gut immunity works.

As Katri Korpela, lead researcher at Finlands University of Helsinki immunobiology

program, explained to HealthDay News, a breastfed infant receives bacteria from the
mother as well as specific sugar components that promote the growth of certain gut
bacteria. This doesnt happen with formula.

Breastfeedings effect on a persons lifelong gut microbiome has been a hot topic the last
few years. This study further supports that breastfeedings health benefits are rooted to how
it helps a baby develop intestinal bacteria.

This study also shows that antibiotics appear to disrupt that development.

Furthermore, its suspected that breastfeeding protects against obesity by establishing a

healthy gut microbiome that then regulates how the gut handles food and feelings of
fullness. So breastfeeding but also antibiotics puts a baby at risk of obesity, too.

The bad news doesnt stop there. This dysfunction, according to Italys University of
Salerno pediatric gastroenterologist Pietro Vajro, may cause chronic inflammation in the
bloodstream characteristic of not only obesity but other chronic, related conditions such as
fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome.

Almost every woman can relate to developing a yeast infection following a course of
antibiotics. Basically, the antibiotics kill all the bacteria, good and bad, and without the
good bacteria to keep the yeast in check, they overgrow. A yeast infection is a yeast
overgrowth. Antifungal medication knocks back the yeast to allow the good bacteria to re-
colonize, which keeps the yeast balanced.

This is similar to what happens in a babys gut when given antibiotics the antibiotics kill
all the bacteria, bad and good, upsetting the just budding gut microbiome and potentially
changing the trajectory of babys gut, immunity and long-term health.

While this study stresses that it does not show a direct cause-and-effect between antibiotic
use and increased infections and eventual obesity in breastfed babies, I would hope that it
does give mothers and health care providers pause before prescribing that next
antibiotic for an infection may be able to resolve without such aggressive treatment.

One of my favorite facts about breastfeeding and one I regularly share with WIC clients
in the peak of the cold and flu season is how the antibodies in breastmilk detect
pathogen exposure on babys saliva and literally change in real time to give better immunity
to baby. Maybe its time to give breastfeeding more of a chance before jumping straight to
an antibiotic Rx?

Rita Brhel
Rita Brhel, BS, CLC, is the Executive Editor for Attachment Parenting
International, a WIC Breastfeeding Peer Counselor, and a domestic violence
survivors advocate. She and her husband, and their 3 children, live near
Hastings, Nebraska, USA.

American Medical Association

opposes mandatory vaccines
By: D. Samuelson
Date: August 25, 2016

At first this headline appears to be good news, indicating that the American Medical
Association (AMA) has finally woken up to the medical tyranny of mandatory vaccines.
Unfortunately, as is the case with so many institutions, while the AMAs guiding principles
originally include detailed support of informed consent, their modern-day practice is far
removed from those moral foundations.

The Health Ranger reports, A mandatory vaccination policy forced vaccination of

unwilling recipients is, by definition, a medical intervention carried out without the
consent of the patient or the patients parents. This directly violates the very clear
language in the Informed Consent section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics which states:

The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment Informed consent
is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is
unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is
imminent.

When was the last time your doctor handed you a sheet that detailed the toxic combination
of ingredients in your childrens vaccine? Were you fully informed before you gave your
consent? What about the terrifying increase in medical kidnapping, where children are
taken from parents who have the audacity to question their physician, or even dare to
suggest alternative medicine? Why should you or the AMA follow dictates of government
health officials or media talking heads who intimidate and coerce people into a treatment
they do not want?
 As Natural News stated, If the AMA does not immediately denounce the widespread
vaccine violations of its own Code of Ethics, then what medical ethics does the AMA
actually stand for, if any? Are there any limits to the coercion tactics doctors may use
against patients to force them into medical treatments demanded by doctors?

Breastfeeding may protect mother against

metabolic syndrome, study suggests
Download PDF Copy

February 16, 2017 at 10:52 AM

A new study shows that women who spend a longer time breastfeeding during their lifetimes
may be able to lower their risk of metabolic syndrome and related disorders included elevated
blood pressure, glucose, and triglyceride levels. Life-long breastfeeding of 12 months or
longer was associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome, as reported in Journal of
Women's Health, a peer-reviewed publication from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. The
article is available free on the Journal of Women's Health website until March 16, 2017.

The article entitled "Association Between Duration of Breast Feeding and Metabolic
Syndrome: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys" describes
a study of more than 4,700 Korean women aged 19-50 years in which the risk of
developing metabolic syndrome or its component disorders was assessed based on life-
long duration of breastfeeding, divided into four groups: < 5 months, 6-11 months, 12-23
months, or > 24 months. Coauthors Se Rin Choi, Yong Min Kim, Min Su Cho, So Hyun
Kim, and Young Suk Shim, Hallym University, College of Medicine (Seoul, Korea),
report the duration of breastfeeding found to be associated with decreased risk of
individual components of metabolic syndrome, such as blood pressure, blood glucose,
and cholesterol.

"The advantageous effects of breastfeeding for newborns and babies are well established, and
this study, which suggests that breastfeeding may protect the mother against metabolic
syndrome, further adds to the evidence base supporting the benefits of breastfeeding for
maternal health," says Susan G. Kornstein, MD, Editor-in-Chief of Journal of Women's
Health, Executive Director of the Virginia Commonwealth University Institute for Women's
Health, Richmond, VA, and President of the Academy of Women's Health.

Source:

http://www.liebertpub.com/global/pressrelease/can-breastfeeding-reduce-a-womans-risk-of-
metabolic-syndrome/2110/
Neuroscience Shows Breastfeeding Is Not Just Milk

Lifelong effects of breastfeeding on mental health

Early life experiences set the stage for physical health in later life. Reducing early toxic stress
is key to preventing disease in adults (Shonkoff, 2016).

Breastfeeding is one important way to decrease early toxic stress. Recent studies have
shown that breastfeeding increases babies physical and mental well-being, and these
effects go well beyond the composition of the milk. Maternal responsiveness is key to
understanding these long-term effects. When mothers consistently respond to their babies
cues, they set the stage for lifelong resiliency in their offspring. And responsiveness is built
into the breastfeeding relationship. We see this reflected in childrens mental health.

In one study of 2,900 mother-infant pairs, breastfeeding for one year was associated
with better child mental health at every age up to age 14 (Oddy et al., 2009). Longer
duration of breastfeeding was associated with better child mental health at every
assessment point.

Maternal depression

Maternal depression has a well-documented negative effect on babies and children. It is

harmful because it impairs mothers ability to be responsive to their babies. Depressed
mothers tend to disengage from their babies, and fail to respond to their cues. Babies
experience this as highly stressful, and there can be lifelong effects from being raised by a
chronically depressed mother or father (Field, Diego, & Hernandez-Reif, 2009; Kendall-
Tackett, 2002, 2010; Weissman, 2006).

Edward Tronicks Still-Face Mother experiments are an analog of what happens with
maternal depression. You can see the effects of not responding in these compelling videos.

These effects are long lasting. A 20-year follow-up of children of depressed parents compared
them with a matched group of adult children whose parents had no psychiatric illness. The
adult children of depressed parents had three times the rate of major depression, anxiety
disorders, and substance abuse compared to adult children of non-depressed parents.

For many years, feeding method was not included in studies of maternal depression. In
fact, for years, professionals who specialized in perinatal mental health believed that
breastfeeding was actually a risk factor for postpartum depression. Fortunately, we now
have evidence that indicates that exclusively breastfeeding mothers are at lower risk for
depression. Indeed, breastfeeding is protective of maternal mental health (Dennis &
McQueen, 2009; Groer & Davis, 2006; Kendall-Tackett, Cong, & Hale, 2011).

Sleep

One reason why breastfeeding lowers depression risk is its impact on sleep. On every
parameter of sleep, exclusively breastfeeding mothers fare better than their mixed- or
formula-feeding counterparts:

total length of sleep

minutes to get to sleep

percentage of slow-wave sleep

daytime fatigue
 perceived physical health

(Blyton, Sullivan, & Edwards, 2002; Doan, Gardiner, Gay, & Lee, 2007; Kendall-Tackett et
al., 2011)

Our study of 6,410 mothers indicated that exclusively breastfeeding mothers were
significantly better on every sleep measure compared to their mixed- and formula-
feeding counterparts. Surprisingly, there was no significant difference between the
mixed- and formula-feeding mothers (Kendall-Tackett et al., 2011). In other words,
exclusive breastfeeding is a different physiological experience than mixed feeding. When
mothers supplement with formula, they lose the physiological benefit of breastfeeding on
their sleep.

Protection and responsivity

One study also found

that breastfeeding protects babies when their mothers are depressed. This study
compared four groups of mothers: mothers who were either depressed (breast or
formula-feeding) or non-depressed (breast or formula-feeding). The measure was the
babies EEG (electroencephalogram) patterns (abnormal patterns were a symptom of
depression in the infants). The babies of depressed, breastfeeding mothers had normal
EEG patterns compared to the babies of depressed, formula-feeding mothers (Jones,
McFall, & Diego, 2004). In other words, breastfeeding protected the babies from the
harmful effects of their mothers depression. The reason for this finding comes down to
maternal responsivity. The researchers discovered that the depressed, breastfeeding
mothers did not disengage from their babies. They couldnt. The breastfeeding mothers
looked at, touched, and made eye contact with their babies more than the mothers who
were not breastfeeding. And that was enough to make a difference.

Cycle of violence

Mothers with a history of childhood abuse often

feel as though they do not have the tools they need to parent their own children successfully.
They may wonder whether they will perpetuate the cycle of violence.

Impaired sleep can be an important trigger to the intergenerational transmission of abuse.

Babies of mothers with depression or PTSD are more likely to have sleep difficulties,
possibly because of their exposure in utero to their mothers elevated stress hormones (Field,
Diego, & Hernandez-Reif, 2006; Field et al., 2007). And a recent study found that for women
with PTSD and a history of childhood abuse, infant sleep difficulties and maternal depression
impaired mother-infant bonding and increased the risk of intergenerational transmission of
trauma (Hairston et al., 2011). But theres a different picture if the mother breastfeeds.

In Strathearn et als (2009) 15-year longitudinal study of 7,223 Australian mother-infant

pairs, breastfeeding substantially lowered the risk of maternal-perpetrated child
maltreatment. Non-breastfeeding mothers were 2.6 times more likely to be physically
abusive, and 3.8 times more likely to neglect their children compared to breastfeeding
mothers.

The results of our 2013 study may help explain why this is so. In our sample of 6,410
new mothers, 994 women reported previous sexual assault. As predicted, sexual assault
had a pervasive, negative effect on mothers sleep, physical well-being, and mental
health. The sexually assaulted mothers sleep was poor, they were more tired, they were
more anxious and angry, and had more depression. But when we added feeding method
to our analyses, we found that breastfeeding attenuated the effects of sexual assault and
downregulated the stress response. This effect was only for exclusively breastfeeding
women (Kendall-Tackett, Cong, & Hale, 2013). Anger, in particular, was lessened and
this might explain Strathearns findings cited above. Also, lower rates of depression
improve maternal responsiveness, which is protective.

Attachment and long-term health

We can also examine the impact of security of mother-infant attachment and its effects on
long-term health. In an article written shortly before the end of their lives, attachment
pioneers Mary Ainsworth and John Bowlby noted that maternal (or caregiver) responsivity
was key to creating a secure attachment in infants. Ainsworth developed the primary measure
of attachment in infants: The Strange Situation.

The Strange Situation has been used in thousands of studies all over the world. Secure
attachment on this measure is a great predictor of child mental and physical health. And
responsiveness is key. When babies are not responded to consistently, they develop insecure
attachments, and that has long-term implications for health, as a recent 32-year longitudinal
study of 163 people found (Puig, Englund, Simpson, & Collins, 2013). Participants in this
study were followed from birth to age 32. At 12 to 18 months, they were assessed via the
Strange Situation. Those with insecure attachments had significantly more inflammation-
based illnesses at age 32 than those who had secure attachments. These findings are likely
due to the chronic activation of the inflammatory response system in those with insecure
attachments.

In summary, the results from these studies demonstrate that breastfeeding has a much larger
role to play in maintaining physical and mental health than we have previously believed.

Because breastfeeding increases maternal responsivity, it makes the day-to-day experience of

mothering more tolerable. And it increases the chances that the babies will be securely
attached. Breastfeeding is so much more than just a method of feeding. Its a way of caring
for a baby that will provide a lifetimes worth of good health because it provides a way for
mothers to connect with their babieseven if they did not experience that kind of care
themselves.
In short, breastfeeding can make the world a happier and healthier place, one mother and
baby at a time. Its not just the milk.

References

Details

Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality

development. American Psychologist, 46, 333-341.

Blyton, D. M., Sullivan, C. E., & Edwards, N. (2002). Lactation is associated with an
increase in slow-wave sleep in women. Journal of Sleep Research, 11(4), 297-303.

Dennis, C.-L., & McQueen, K. (2009). The relationship between infant-feeding outcomes and
postpartum depression: A qualitative systematic review. Pediatrics, 123, e736-e751.

Doan, T., Gardiner, A., Gay, C. L., & Lee, K. A. (2007). Breastfeeding increases sleep
duration of new parents. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 21(3), 200-206.

Field, T., Diego, M., & Hernandez-Reif, M. (2006). Prenatal depression effects on the fetus
and newborn: A review. Infant Behavior & Development, 29, 445-455.

Field, T., Diego, M., & Hernandez-Reif, M. (2009). Infants of depressed mothers are less
responsive to faces and voices: A review. Infant Behavior & Development, 32(3), 239-244.

Field, T., Diego, M., Hernandez-Reif, M., Figueiredo, B., Schanberg, S., & Kuhn, C. (2007).
Sleep disturbance in depressed pregnant women and their newborns. Infant Behavior &
Development, 30, 127-133.

Groer, M. W., & Davis, M. W. (2006). Cytokines, infections, stress, and dysphoric moods in
breastfeeders and formula feeders. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing,
35, 599-607.
Hairston, I. S., Waxler, E., Seng, J. S., Fezzey, A. G., Rosenblum, K. L., & Muzik, M. (2011).
The role of infant sleep in intergenerational transmission of trauma. Sleep, 34(10), 1373-
1383.

Jones, N. A., McFall, B. A., & Diego, M. A. (2004). Patterns of brain electrical activity in
infants of depressed mothers who breastfeed and bottle feed: The mediating role of infant
temperament. Biological Psychology, 67, 103-124.

Kendall-Tackett, K. A. (2002). Depression in new mothers: Why it matters to the child

maltreatment field. Section on Child Maltreatment Newsletter, American Psychological
Association, 6, 8-9.

Kendall-Tackett, K. A. (2010) (2016). Depression in new mothers: Causes, consequences and

treatment options, 2nd Edition, 3rd Edition. London: Routledge.

Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Cong, Z., & Hale, T. W. (2011). The effect of feeding method on
sleep duration, maternal well-being, and postpartum depression. Clinical Lactation, 2(2), 22-
26.

Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Cong, Z., & Hale, T. W. (2013). Depression, sleep quality, and
maternal well-being in postpartum women with a history of sexual assault: A comparison of
breastfeeding, mixed-feeding, and formula-feeding mothers Breastfeeding Medicine, 8 (1),
16-22.

Oddy, W. H., Kendall, G. E., Li, J., Jacoby, P., Robinson, M., de Klerk, N. H., . . . Stanley, F.
J. (2009). The long-term effects of breastfeeding on child and adolescent mental health: A
pregnancy cohort study followed for 14 years. Journal of Pediatrics, 156(4), 568-574.

Puig, J., Englund, M. M., Simpson, J. A., & Collins, W. A. (2013). Predicting adult physical
illness from infant attachment: A prospective longitudinal study. Health Psychology, 32(4),
409-417.

Shonkoff, J. P., Boyce, W. T., & McEwen, B. S. (2009). Neuroscience, molecular biology, and
the childhood roots of health disparities: building a new framework for health promotion and
disease prevention. JAMA, 301(21), 2252-2259. doi: 301/21/2252
[pii] 10.1001/jama.2009.754

Shonkoff, J.P. (2016). Capitalizing on Advances in Science to Reduce the Health

Consequences of Early Childhood Adversity. JAMA Pediatr, 170(10),1003-1007.
doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1559

Strathearn, L., Mamun, A. A., Najman, J. M., & OCallaghan, M. J. (2009). Does
breastfeeding protect against substantiated child abuse and neglect? A 15-year cohort study.
Pediatrics, 123(2), 483-493. doi: 123/2/483 [pii] 10.1542/peds.2007-3546

Weissman, M. M., Wickramaratne, P., Nomura, Y., Warner, V., Pilowsky, D., & Verdeli, H.
(2006). Offspring of depressed parents: 20 years later. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163,
1001-1008.

Kathleen Kendall-Tackett, PhD, IBCLC, FAPA

 Dr. Kendall-Tackett is a health psychologist and International
Board Certified Lactation Consultant, and the owner and Editor-in-Chief of Praeclarus Press,
a small press specializing in womens health. She is Editor-in-Chief of two peer-reviewed
journals: Clinical Lactation and Psychological Trauma. She is Fellow of the American
Psychological Association in Health and Trauma Psychology, Past President of the APA
Division of Trauma Psychology, and a member of the Board for the Advancement of
Psychology in the Public Interest. Dr. Kendall-Tackett specializes in womens-health research
including breastfeeding, depression, trauma, and health psychology, and has won many
awards for her work including the 2016 Outstanding Service to the Field of Trauma
Psychology from the American Psychological Associations Division 56.

Dr. Kendall-Tackett has authored more than 400 articles or chapters, and is currently
completing her 35th book, The Phantom of the Opera: A Social History of the Worlds Most
Popular Musical. Her most recent books include: Depression in New Mothers,
3rd Edition (2016, Routledge UK, in press), Womens Mental Health Across the
Lifespan (2016, Routledge US, in press, with Lesia Ruglass), Psychology of Trauma
101 (2015, Springer, with Lesia Ruglass) and The Science of Mother-Infant Sleep (2014,
Praeclarus, with Wendy Middlemiss). Her websites are:

UppityScienceChick.com

BreastfeedingMadeSimple.com

KathleenKendall-Tackett.com

PraeclarusPress.com

Google Scholar

Vaccines and Pregnancy: The Criminal

Conspiracy to Create Autism
By: Dr. Matthew Buckley, PSc.D, CTTH

The CDC has been given an annual budget of over $11 billion dollars to spend (R), which is
provided under the auspices of protecting the American public from various health care
threats, but are they really doing that? Theres plenty of incriminating data available to prove
that theyre doing just the opposite of that.

Consider the following facts:

1) Executives within the CDC, including Dr. Frank DeStefano, are alleged to have cooked
research data in order to conceal a link between the MMR vaccine and autism in black
children, according to Dr. William Thompson, who has been given whistleblower protection
status for bringing this fact to light. The study in question was published in 2004 in the
Journal of Pediatrics, and has not been retracted despite the admission by Dr. Thompson that
the paper is fraudulent. This is highly important since many pro-vaccination pediatricians will
point to this study as proof that the MMR vaccine doesnt cause autism, and is therefore
safe and effective. Journalist Ben Swann has put together an excellent micro-documentary
covering this sensational story that is being ignored by the mainstream media.

Truth in Media: CDC, Vaccines and Autism from Ben Swann on Vimeo.

2) Dr. DeStefano strikes again. In 2009, Dr. Frank DeStefano, was serving as the
Immunization Safety Officer for the CDC, when the Price C., Robertson A., Goodson B.
(2009) Thimerosal and Autism Technical Report. was published. This report revealed that
the flu vaccine given during pregnancy led to an 8x greater risk of developing autism
than those who didnt receive the flu vaccine. This data was however considered
insignificant, and was left out of the abstract but is found within the body of the paper. (R)
3) Virtually all degenerative disease, autism included, can be characterized as persistent
inflammation with biomarkers of elevations in pro-inflammatory immune signaling
molecules called cytokines. Research has established a very clear link between an
increase in these pro-inflammatory cytokines during pregnancy and autism, aka
Maternal Immune Activation. (R) (R) (R)Persistent inflammation is most commonly
expressed as an elevation in the following cytokines: Interferon gamma (IFN-y), Interluekin
1b (IL-1b), Interluekin 6(IL-6), and Interluekin 17 (IL-17). Interleukin 17 is perhaps the
most significant, and has established itself as the most important cytokine for
perpetuating autoimmune conditions. This is certainly no secret to any competent
immunologist within the CDC. (R) (R)

Its worth noting that the injectable form of the flu vaccine is an inducer of IL -6 (R), and IL-
6 has been shown to do couple deleterious things to our immune system. One, it leads to a
persistence in viral infections!(R) Two, it also promotes the creation of IL-17 (R) (R). This
revelation has very serious implications for anybody interested in protecting their brain and
body, since this combination will promote an inflamed brain, aka microglial activation.

4) Research data on the biochemical mechanisms of immune response to vaccines

suggests that virtually ALL vaccines work by inducing IL-17. This too is no secret to the
CDC. The authors from the following study acknowledge the real dangers associated with
vaccines inducing IL-17, but it seems a minor afterthought to them. This paper from 2010 is
about the modernization of vaccines, and it clearly illustrates the overall dangerous
imprecision that is vaccine science and application. (R) Heres a quote from that paper:

IL-17 is a key player in the inflammation and tissue destruction associated with
autoimmune disease models such as Experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE)[52] and
collagen-induced arthritis[77]. Most autoimmune models deliver antigens in adjuvants such
as Complete Freunds Adjuvant (CFA) [52]or pertussis toxin [39] to induce the inflammatory
disease phenotype. Although CFA was initially thought to drive potent Th1 responses, it is
now clear that CFA can drive differentiation of nave T cells into Th17 pathway[52]. Further
pertussis toxin can also induce pathogenic Th17 inflammatory responses in the setting of
vaccination[39]. These studies highlight the need for detailed characterization of
adjuvants prior to inclusion into vaccine strategies since the delicate balance of IL-17 in
vaccine induced immunity may define tissue destruction or immune protection.

5) Research shows autism to be an inflammatory condition, with elevations of pro-

inflammatory cytokines being found in the blood of the autistic population. There are
now NUMEROUS studies verifying this evidence(R)(R)(R)(R), and one of the most notable,
when considering the fact that many, if not all, vaccines work by activating the production of
IL-17 is from the following study published in the Journal of Neuroinflammation in 2012.(R)

Serum IL-17A levels were raised in the group with autism, and the levels correlated
significantly with the severity of autism. This is the first study to measure levels of IL-17A
in relation to the severity of autism, to our knowledge. Further research, with a larger subject
population, is warranted to determine whether the increase of serum IL-17A levels plasma
has a pathogenic role in autism, and whether anti- IL-17A therapy could be useful

So the authors of that study wonder if anti-IL 17A therapy could be useful? Heres a clue
for them, how about avoiding those immune skewing vaccines which promote IL 17
production in the first place?

More recently, a 2016 study involving mice further supports the damaging link between IL
17A production in mothers and the production of autism in their offspring.(R)

We find that Maternal Immune Activation induces an abnormal cortical phenotype, which is
also dependent on maternal IL-17a, in the fetal brain. Our data suggest that therapeutic
targeting of TH17 cells in susceptible pregnant mothers may reduce the likelihood of bearing
children with inflammation-induced autistic spectrum-like phenotypes.
Microencephaly caused by vaccines, and not Zika?

Have you heard about Zika virus causing microencephaly (shrunken heads)? I suspect you
have. Theres a race to create a vaccine for it, and vaccines sell a lot better when the general
public is scared of viruses when there is a vaccine available. Would you be surprised to learn
that before the increased reporting of microencephaly in Brazil, that the Brazilian government
mandated the DTaP vaccine for pregnant women? They did. (R) Would you be surprised to
learn that the DTaP vaccine increases IL 17 production? It does.(R) Would you be surprised
to learn that the US government knew that the DTaP vaccine increases the risk of
microencephaly in 1991? You shouldnt be, because they did.(R)

But, arent vaccines proven to be effective in preventing infection before theyre

approved for use?

No, in order for a vaccine to be approved, the vaccines must be able to demonstrate the
production of antibodies. No proof of disease prevention is required for approval. Its
assumed that the production of antibodies equates to a protection against the pathogen that
the vaccine was created for. This, however, is not an entirely accurate assumption.

What effective vaccines do is activate the immune system, and this activation is highly
dangerous for many people, especially pregnant women, and those with a tendency towards
over producing the pro-inflammatory cytokines. Those with a deficiency of melatonin and
toxic guts are going to be at much higher risks as I detailed in a previous post.

But, what about polio and small pox? Wouldnt we all be paralyzed from polio, if we
survived small pox if it werent for vaccines?
Making diseases disappear isnt difficult if you get to control the definition of what
constitutes a disease and how the epidemiological data is tabulated. The scam of making
diseases disappear following vaccination campaigns is glaring when you look at the recent
news about India being declared polio free following a successful vaccination program.

Its worth nothing that polio and Acute Flaccid Paralysis are clinically identical. You might
find it odd that following the successful polio vaccination campaign that cases of acute
flaccid paralysis have skyrocketed in India.

Dr. Susanne Humphries has done an excellent job exposing the details of the polio scam.

Dr. Sherry Tenpenny has also done excellent work in exposing the small pox vaccine scam as
well.

Whats really happening?

So, are we to believe that the CDC is filled with a bunch of bumbling fools that dont really
know what theyre doing, or is there something more sinister going on here?

If the CDC had clear evidence in 2004 that there was a link between autism and the MMR
vaccine, but cooked the data to conceal that link, what does that tell you about the integrity of
the CDC?
If the CDC had clear evidence in 2009 that giving the flu vaccine to pregnant women
increased the risk of autism by 8x the general population, but chose to bury that data within
their study, what does that tell you about the integrity of the CDC in watching out for your
health?

If the CDC knows all of this, and subsequent research since 2009 reveals that a mother
experiencing an excited immune system, aka maternal immune activation, has a much
greater probability of having an offspring with autism, schizophrenia, and other neuro-
immuno health challenges such as microencephaly, how can it reasonably be argued that the
CDC is looking out for our health when they continue to recommend mercury laden flu
vaccines to pregnant women? The amount of mercury in those shots is 100 times higher than
what the EPA has stated as safe for pregnant women to consume.(R) If they know that each
person has a different expression of immune system response, why do they continue to
recommend a one size fits all approach with vaccines? This is criminal neglect at a
minimum, and modern day Joseph Mengeleism at worst.

Mandatory vaccines for all is on the agenda

There is an agenda to make vaccinations mandatory for everybody, per the Healthy People
2020 plan. (R) You can be sure that very coercive means will be employed by the
government to compel all to comply with their dangerous vaccine dictates.

The health care cost to care for an autistic individual over their lifetime is estimated to be
around $2 million, conservatively speaking. Now consider that current trends in autism
suggest an increased rate of incidence to reach 1 in 2 individuals by 2025, according to MIT
scientist, Dr. Stefanie Seneff (R). Who will care for these individuals? Who will care for us
when were old? Think about it.

Ask yourself, could any jihadist with a foreign biological agent dropped from a broken vial in
the middle of a city, as in a Hollywood production, cause this much destruction as were
currently dealing with? Not likely. The enemies have embedded themselves within our own
institutions, and its up to us to expose them and extract them from their places of power
before its too late. This is our reality and the vaccine issue is really just scratching the
surface of how deep this problem goes. I encourage all to become familiar with the recently
peer reviewed epidemiology paper related to the global depopulation agenda that is
accelerating by the day and come to terms with its implications and the necessity to act now
to stop it. Your voice matters. Use it. Please spread the word!

DrBuckley
http://kinseimindbody.com/
About the author: Dr. Buckley is a 2002 graduate of Logan College of Chiropractic. He
entered the health care field largely to understand and resolve his personal struggles with
chronic fatigue and fibromyalgia which began late in his teens. His ongoing study of
functional medicine, nutrition, nutrigenomics, applied kinesiology, and energetic medicine
has provided him with keen insight and understanding into the holistic dynamics of the body
and how we lose and maintain our health. He has maintained a busy practice in Austin, Texas
for the past 13 years and works with people of all ages interested in maximizing their health,
and overcoming the modern scourge of all forms of chronic illness.
BREAKING: Yale University Study
Establishes Link Between Major
Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Childhood
Vaccinations
by Yelena Sukhoterina | February 14, 2017

How healthy are American children these days, exactly? As far as adults go, the picture is
grim: the United States rates 51st on the world list of life expectancy despite its exorbitant
healthcare spending, and the majority of Americans are burdened by chronic illnesses, often
struggling with four or more at a time.

Sadly, this illness epidemic in the U.S. often starts early in a persons life, before they have
the knowledge and wisdom to make better choices. The stats are eye-opening to say the least:

-1 in 10 children between ages 5 and 17 are diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD)

-1 in 10 adolescents have experienced at least one major depressive episode every year

-1 in 10 youth have a mood disorder

-Anxiety disorder affects 8% of children ages 13-18

-The eating disorder anorexia nervosa (AN) is on the rise in children as young as
kindergartners

-1 in 5 children experience debilitating mental disorders

-72% of all children have some kind of emotional problem

(Source: CDC)

All of the disorders have many potential contributing factors, including environmental ones,
food dyes in much of what children eat, unbalanced diets, GMOs and pesticide-laden foods,
to name a few.

But what if there is another contributing factor childhood vaccinations, and the growing
numbers of them on the CDCs recommendation schedule (25 shots from birth to 15 months
old is recommended, and at least 29 more are usually given before the age of 18).

A new study sheds some light to these vaccinations potential link to these disorders.

Yale Study: Brain-Related Disorders Rise Following Childhood Vaccinations

A new study led by the Department of Public Health Science at the Pennsylvania State
University College of Medicine and Yale University found a surprising association
between children receiving vaccinations and then developing brain-related autoimmune
and inflammatory disorders: ADHD, OCD, anxiety, depression, bipolar, anorexia, and
chronic tic disorder.

For the study, over 95,000 kids analyzed had one of the seven aforementioned
neuropsychiatric disorders.

The cases were compared against other kids who did not have neuropsychiatric disorders,
and others with conditions that could not possibly be caused or contributed to by vaccines:
open wounds and broken bones.

As expected, the broken bones and open wounds cases showed no link to vaccinations; those
with depression, ADHD and bipolar disorders did not show any significant association with
vaccinations either.

But those who had been vaccinated were a shocking 80 percent more likely to be diagnosed
with anorexia, and 25 percent more likely to be diagnosed with OCD than their non-
vaccinated counterparts. Higher rates of anxiety disorders and chronic tics were also linked to
vaccinations.

The study suggested that the correlation is temporary, but concluded that the onset of these
disorders may be triggered by the vaccines.

These findings provide preliminary epidemiologic evidence that the onset of some pediatric-
onset neuropsychiatric disorders, including AN, OCD, anxiety disorders, and tic disorders,
may be temporally related to prior vaccinations, the study concluded.
The authors were especially careful in how they phrased their findings. This could be due to
the fact that one of the authors, James F. Leckman, has received salary and funding from the
National Institute of Health (NIH), and it has been noted that this may present a conflict of
interest (the NIH has been taking money from vaccine manufacturers for years).

In the end, the study concluded that more research needs to be done.

But further research has been done in the past. And apart from studies funded by vaccine
makers, privately-funded studies have raised their fair share of red flags.

Many Studies Linked Brain, Immune and Neurological Disorders and Vaccines for
Years

Vaccine injuries in children are becoming more common. Matthew Gage Downing-Powers
passed away shortly after receiving catch-up vaccinations. He is not the only one. Source:
GoFundMe.com

The Yale-PSU study is not the first to find an association between brain-related disorders and
vaccinations. And it most likely will not be the last one.

Among the studies showing links are the following (click the blue text for more
information):

-Neurodevelopmental disorders are more common in children who received thimerosal-

containing vaccines.
-Autism-like symptoms: Chinese scientists witnessed autism-like behavior in mice when
injected with thimerosal found in some vaccines.

-Emergency room visits: a pediatrics study found that fully vaccinated children have
higher rates of emergency room and outpatient doctor visits than unvaccinated
children.

-Heavy-metal contamination: Italian scientists found heavy metal contaminants in all

childhood vaccines. These pollutants are associated with brain disorders, and
neurological problems (Is this contamination due to vaccines now being made in China,
the country known for widespread lead contamination? We may not know due to a
surprising lack of regulations).

-Aluminum toxicity: Italian and Israeli scientists find that aluminum in vaccines is
responsible for many auto-immune disorders.

-Gardasil and inflammation: Canadian, Israeli, and Colombian scientists found that the
Gardasil vaccine is responsible for brain inflammation in mice.

-Hospitalizations: a recent study found that receiving multiple vaccines at once

increases the risk of hospitalizations and death.

-Allergies: many studies have suggested that food proteins in vaccine ingredients may
induce food allergies.

The list of studies linking vaccines to a variety of serious health issues goes on, and it keeps
growing every year. With that in mind, its more important than ever to keep spreading
information about the potential dangers of vaccines, and to stand for the right to vaccine
choice, while also continuing to question the growing vaccine schedule for children.

A child in the U.S. receives at least 54 shots before they turn 18 (significantly more than any
other country), and new vaccines are added to the recommended schedule every year.

Meanwhile, the mainstream media is attempting to make the issue a black-and-white, pro-
vaccine vs. anti-vaccine argument.

In reality, the debate centers around corrupt pharmaceutical companies and how far theyll be
allowed to go in the name of profit. Most vaccine studies are funded by pharmaceutical
companies, who are well-entrenched in both government and media branches because of their
enormous financial influence. From 1998-2016, the pharmaceutical lobby spent over $3.5
billion dollars on lobbying, tops among all industries in the United States.

Vaccines are short on independent studies proving their safety, contain toxic ingredients, and
are now being made in China without any U.S. testing. And the results dont lie over $3
billion has been paid out to vaccine injured people since 1986, when the U.S. made it illegal
to sue drug companies and created a uniform system for reporting the many injuries that
happen each year.
One way to spread awareness is to sign and share articles like these, as well as petitions, such
as the ones on Change.org, to help keep the pharmaceutical industry honest when it comes to
the growing vaccine industry.

A hot topic right now is the push to pass mandatory vaccination laws in all states
(which already happened in California). You can sign one of the petitions here.

Studys Conclusions Contradictory, Or Fair?

Despite the findings and potential for harm linked to childhood vaccines, the studys authors
concluded that parents should continue vaccinating on schedule (the same schedule that
many have criticized as being far too bloated and dangerously untested).

From the studys conclusion titled Clinical Significance:

These findings provide preliminary epidemiologic evidence that the onset of some pediatric-
onset neuropsychiatric disorders, including AN, OCD, anxiety disorders, and tic disorders,
may be temporally related to prior vaccinations, the studys conclusion said. Each of these
conditions is etiologically heterogeneous, and host factors likely play an important role in a
small subset of vulnerable individuals. However, these findings, even if replicated in future
studies, do not prove a causal role of vaccination in the pathoetiology of any of these
conditions.

The authors continued:

Given the modest magnitude of these findings and the clear public health benefits of the
timely administration of vaccines in preventing mortality and morbidity in childhood, we
encourage families to maintain the currently recommended vaccination schedules while
taking all necessary precautions as documented by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, the study concluded.

If the conclusion seems a bit contradictory, youre not alone: there are plenty of parents out
there with vaccine-injured kids who beg to differ, and will likely point to these results as
further evidence that something needs to change within the industry before more lives are
senselessly damaged, ruined, or possibly even lost.

Ultimately the question of how and whether to administer each vaccination belongs in the
hands of parents everywhere, in coordination with their doctors for each person to weigh
all of the evidence available and make the best choice for their children

HomeRecommended ProductsNicks Health BooksDisclaimerAbout MeAdvertise with Us

BREAKING: Yale University Study Establishes Link Between Major Neuropsychiatric

Disorders and Childhood Vaccinations
THIS Country Has the Worlds Healthiest Children. Heres What They Do Differently. (#6 is
a real problem in the U.S.)
Not Going to Back Down: RFK Jr., De
Niro Call Out Mainstream Media at Press
Conference, Offer $100,000 Challenge Over
Controversial Vaccine Additive
by Yelena Sukhoterina | February 17, 2017

Clean vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project, the producer of
the vaccine documentary Vaxxed Del Bigtree, and actor Robert De Niro, who has recently
joined the fight for safe vaccines, spoke to Washington D.C. journalists at a news conference
on the morning of February 15 about the urgent need to begin adequately covering stories
about the risks of vaccines.

Kennedy, who has recently been asked by President Donald Trump to study vaccine safety,
also gave the journalists an unexpected challenge: he vowed to give anyone $100,000 for
finding a study showing that thimerosal at the amounts currently used in the vaccines is safe.
Kennedy is confident that such study does not exist.

On the conference table, he provided 240 studies, all of which he said showed that thimerosal
(a vaccine preservative that contains 50% mercury) is extremely toxic and is associated with
neurodevelopmental issues. Over 80 studies he presented show that it is linked to autism-like
symptoms in humans and animals.

PHOTO: World Mercury Project, Facebook

After pointing out the concerning studies, Kennedy brought up vaccination facts that have
been ignored by the mainstream media and called out the journalists in the room for not
covering these stories.

Over 6,000 Parents Sent World Mercury Project Cases of Children Injured by
Vaccinations in Less Than 24 Hours

The number of parents who have children injured by vaccinations is growing every year, yet
it is hidden from the general public. It is rare for anyone to ask them about their stories, so
when Kennedy Jr. sent out a request for personal vaccine-injury cases, he has received over
6,000 personal accounts in less than 24 hours. These cases were presented in front of the
reporters at the news conference.

The parents of these children are sometimes afraid to speak out as they have been shamed,
verbally attacked, and shut down. The mainstream media has completely alienated them and
refuses to hear their stories. But when given the outlet, thousands of families step forward all
sharing an eerily similar story. Otherwise healthy children would lose eye contact and start
showing autism-like symptoms right after or soon after receiving a vaccination.
De Niro is one of these parents. His wife Grace and he have a child with autism. He has
spoken out previously about the corruption in the CDC, and has called out journalists before
for not investigating it.

If you are a scientist, lets see it, lets hear it. Everybody doesnt seem to want to hear much
about it. Its shutdown. And you guys [speaking to news casters] are the ones that should be
investigating, said De Niro on a Today Show.

The Media is Not Covering the Vaccine Debate, Instead Using Anti-Vaxxer label To
Shut Down Information

In all the years I have talked about the dangers of mercury in the fish, I have never been
called anti-fish. So why am I being called an anti-vaxxer?

Kennedy Jr. called out journalist sh shut him down as an anti-vaxxer. He requested that
they find him a study that proves thimerosal as safe. PHOTO: Twitter

Anyone who has questioned the safety of thimerosal or other toxic preservatives in the
vaccines have been completely shut down by the mainstream media. It has happened to
Kennedy, De Niro, even when Jim Carrey spoke for making vaccines safe and thimerosal-
free.

I want to re-instate, I am pro-vaccines, I want safe vaccines, said Kennedy Jr. at the
conference. But if the past keeps repeating itself, his words will become unheard.

Because of a lack of respect for the clean vaccine movement, headlines are slanted and stories
are marginalized. This may be because pharmaceutical companies bring huge advertisement
revenue to the media at-large, and this conflict of interest provides immunity for them in
many cases.

The numbers (read: dollar signs) certainly dont lie.

Pharmaceutical Companies Spend More Money on Lobbying than Any Other Industry

An investigation by a Colorado TV station found that lawmakers are taking millions in

campaign money from pharmaceutical companies. This explains recent drug price hikes, but
also shows that many politicians have essentially become puppets for the pharmaceutical
companies.

In 2016, congressmen received $14,130,288 from the drug companies, plus many undisclosed
perks they might have received: flights and hotel fees to speak at conferences, meals and any
other bonuses gifted to them.

The total drug companies spent on lobbying last year is an astonishing $150,886,960. Half
of the lobbyists are part of the so-called revolving door and many become congressmen
after being lobbyists.

These long-held, cozy relationships resulted in the passing of The National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which on the surface sounds like it should protect children, bit in
reality gives immunity to the vaccine makers.

Vaccine Makers Cannot Be Sued. They Have Full Immunity Thanks To Congress.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 made it impossible for the vaccine
makers to be sued. When a pharmaceutical company creates a drug that is later discovered to
have horrible side effects, the company gets sued by the injured and has to pay the damages.
(This happens a lot. Just watch the movie Doctored for some of the big cases).

When the company making a vaccine injures a child, the vaccine makers do not get sued.
Instead the family has to go through what some have referred to as the Vaccine Court and
petition the government to compensate for the childs medical care that resulted from the
injury.

The process is extremely long and often takes a few decades to complete. Even when the
family of the injured child wins the case, it has no effect on the vaccine maker.

This act of 1986 gave vaccine manufacturers the green light to continue making more
vaccines without thoroughly studying the effects of giving so many shots on a developing
child.

As the result, children today receive an astonishing number of vaccines. In 1983 the
childhood vaccination recommendation schedule had 11 shots, according to the CDC. In
1995, there were 20. In 2005, there were 26 plus an annual flu shot, making it a total of 44.
And in 2016, there were 34, plus 18 annual flu shots, or a total of 52 shots. The high-risk
groups receive even more vaccinations. The number of childhood vaccinations is growing
each year.
As Bigtree reiterated after Kennedy Jr.s speech, neither of the three men, not him, not
Kennedy, not De Niro ever spoke about being anti-vaccination.

Instead, all are fighting against governmental and pharmaceutical corruption that chooses
money over research into how to make vaccinations safer, and never stops to question do
we really need that many?

The pharmaceutical companies continue to insist that the amount of toxic chemicals like
thimerosal is not dangerous and that vaccines are necessary for public health. But questions
such as why so many different chemicals in vaccines are present in the first place have not
been adequately explained, and serious vaccine injury stories are becoming more and more
publicized as alternative media grows by the day.

Ultimately, the hope is that De Niro, Bigtree and Kennedy Jr.s work is what will bring the
change, and spur more journalists to action, doing what they do best asking the hard
questions, and speaking truth to power.

Considering the amount of leeway theyve been given in the past (and the startling amount of
questions theyve yet to answer), it stands to reason that the vaccine makers should be next in
line to face the heat.

The video recording of the conference is now available at the World Mercury Project
Website.

Trumps Decision to Study Vaccine Safety

with Controversial Activist Backed by
Undeniable Evidence
by Yelena Sukhoterina | January 11, 2017
Already President Elect Donald Trump has made a series of decisions that have caused
holistic health advocates to raise their eyebrows in disbelief including the appointment of
an agricultural community packed with Big Ag executives that are closely allied with the
chemical giants and big environmental polluters.

However, there is one decision just announced that could benefit the lives, and health, of
many children in the long run.

The issue at hand is the safety of vaccinations, particularly childrens vaccinations.

Trump, who has previously met with safe vaccine activists such as Vaxxed director Dr.
Andrew Wakefield during his campaign, and gave money to support Jenny McCarthys fight
for safer vaccines, has now asked Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a vaccine researcher and the nephew
of former president John F. Kennedy, to lead a study on vaccine safety.

The president-elect is also considering forming a commission on autism; however no final

decision has made as of yet.

The news has caused many in the mainstream media to publish stories calling both Trump
and Kennedy vaccine skeptics, and taking the side of the CDC and public health officials.

In a

report from CNN for instance, the storyline was that the pair have stoked unfounded fears
about vaccine safety, while other reports state that there has been no proven link between
autism and vaccinations.
During the presidential campaign, Trump also met with Vaxxed director Dr. Andrew
Wakefield. PHOTO: BolenReport.com

Looking at things through the lens of a parent, however, its easy to see why Trump and
Kennedy would be prefer to be cautious.

Trump became involved in the topic when he and his wife Melanias son Baron was born.
Instead of following the recommended vaccine schedule precisely, he talked to his doctors
and made some adjustments to the timing of the shots:

What weve done with Baron, weve taken him on a very slow process. He gets one shot at a
time then we wait a few months and give him another shot, the old-fashioned way. But today
they pump the children with so much at a very young age. We do it on a very, very
conservative level.

Trumps concern with vaccinations today is their often-debated link to the growing numbers
of children with autism, a brain development disorder. Today, the rate of autism is 1 in 50
children. In 1970s the rate 1 in 2,000. Recently CDC Senior Scientist Dr. William
Thompson brought up data showing a potential link between autism and vaccinations
(especially in African American boys) as well.

Back in 2007, when Trump was asked about the growing autism epidemic in 2007, he said:

When I was growing up, autism wasnt really a factor. And now all of a sudden, its an
epidemic. Everybody has their theory. My theory, and I study it because I have young
children, my theory is the shots. Weve giving these massive injections at one time, and I
really think it does something to the children.

When a little baby that weighs 20 pounds and 30 pounds gets pumped with 10 and 20 shots
at one time, with one injection thats a giant injection, I personally think that has something
to do with it. Now theres a group that agrees with that and theres a group that doesnt agree
with that.
What mainstream media does not discuss is that Trump, Kennedy, and many others are not
anti-vaccination, but are fighting to make vaccinations safer (drug makers constantly have to
pull pharmaceuticals from the market for disregarding safe studies and injuring those who
took them. Vaccines are not any different, and yet they receive special treatment).

In 2014, Trump caused a lot of controversy by publishing the following tweet.

Autism-Vaccine Theory Yet to Be Debunked

Contrary to the popular misconception, the autism-vaccine link has never been disproven.
The autism-vaccine debate has been going around for decades, yet until recently, no official
safety study has been done by the CDC itself. Many other studies done had either conflict of
interest or insufficient data (most importantly, the CDC admits that a study comparing
vaccinated versus unvaccinated children has never been done).

In 2004 when the CDC finally concluded a long-term study on vaccinations and autism
in children, the results were not what they expected. They found a potential link
between the two, primarily in African American boys, and decided to hide the
information from the public.

Their study was published, but the significant information was not, instead it was literally
thrown into a huge garbage can.

This came to light in 2014 when a senior scientist at the CDC, Dr. William Thompson came
forward, admitting to what they did. Florida U.S. Representative Bill Posey spoke about it to
the House of Representatives urging for an official investigation, but not much has been done
since.
Healthy Children Can Become Horribly Sick After Vaccinations

For many, these stories are nothing but anecdotes, but for thousands of families who have
gone through this (and doctors who witnessed it), it is a real tragedy. More people are coming
forward with eerily similar stories. Seemingly healthy children become sick after receiving
vaccinations (some within hours), and many never recover.

Public health officials and the CDC say that vaccines are necessary for public health,
pointing to their effect on disease outbreaks such as polio, measles and other
preventable diseases. But critics say theyre unwilling to fairly study or even discuss the
other side of the question: vaccine injured people.

One of the reasons we might not hear about them is that the only place the affected families
can go to report injuries is to VAERS, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, created
by the CDC and FDA.

The site welcomes its visitors with: Have you or your child had a reaction following
vaccination?

After that, families can ask for monetary compensation from what many call the vaccine
court, an administrative procedure, which is run by a government program called 1986
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act using government-funded science. The act was
passed in large part because of lobbying from pharmaceutical companies, which now
cannot be sued for anything related to the vaccines they make a clear conflict of
interest.

Most importantly, these hearings are not open to the public or press, so we rarely hear
about them.

Porter Bridges developed brain damage after childhood vaccinations. Photo: Bought movie.
I Am Tired of All the Nonsense Doctor
Speaks Out On the FLU SHOT and Is
Forced to Apologize. Heres What He
Wanted You to Know
by Yelena Sukhoterina | January 10, 2017

Dr. Daniel Neides of the Cleveland Clinic wrote a controversial column on toxins in vaccines
and was reprimanded by his own medical community before issuing an apology.

Something unexpected has happened right at the beginning of 2017 a traditionally-trained

doctor spoke out against a misleading CDC claim for the seasonal flu shot and got the
mainstream media to cover it.

Now, the man in question, Dr. Daniel Neides, is facing disciplinary action from the Cleveland
Clinic Wellness Institute (of which he is the medical director and chief operating officer) and
has issued an apology. Prior to that, however, Dr. Neides let us all know how he really felt
about vaccine additives and the toxic burden were all being subjected to on a daily basis.

His opinion piece, titled Make 2017 the Year to Avoid Toxins (Good Luck) and Master Your
Domain: Words On Wellness, was published on the website Cleveland.com. It remains
online for the time being, and since its publication has sparked a massive wave of controversy
that appears to have no clear end in sight.

From toxins in vaccines to autism, Dr. Neides shared numerous important facts to consider.
This is what he originally wanted you to know.

I am tired of all the nonsense we as American citizens are being fed while big business
and the government continue to ignore the health and well-being of the fine people
in this country, Dr. Neides

Serving as a blogger on health and wellness over the past two years, Dr. Neides has covered
his fair share of topics. His wide perspective as a classically-trained, board certified doctor in
family medicine with a degree from Ohio State University, as well as his own experience
overseeing the clinics wellness program (which includes everything from herbal therapy to
mind-body coaching and acupuncture), has served him well as a columnist.

But he touched a nerve in his own medical community, and in some segments of the general
public, when he shared his opinions on vaccine additives and the harm they may potentially
cause.

Dr. Neides wrote that he followed CDC advice and received a flu shot, but knowing that
they contain the preservative thimerosal (50% toxic mercury), he opted for a
preservative-free vaccination. What he did not realize was that this vaccine contains
formaldehyde, a known carcinogen.

In just 12 hours after receiving the flu shot, he felt completely miserable, suffered
from body aches, acquired a cough, and took two sick days to recover. In his blog post,
he took issue with a healthcare system that prides itself as being the best in the world (so
we think, he added), yet allows ingredients like these which contribute to a constant toxic
burden that he believes is fueling the disease epidemic.

When toxins disrupt normal function, problems can occur. Those problems include
cancers, auto-immune diseases, neurologic problems like autism, ADHD, and
Parkinsons Disease, and the most prevalent chronic diseases like obesity, diabetes, and
heart disease. he wrote.

On Monday January 9, just a few short days after his column published on the previous
Friday, Dr. Neides issued the following statement, which appeared sympathetic to his many
critics but did not necessarily backtrack on his original statements:

I apologize and regret publishing a blog that has caused so much concern and
confusion for the public and medical community. I fully support vaccinations and my
concern was meant to be positive around the safety of them. he said.

His column has caused a social media firestorm of controversy between members of the
medical community and supporters of his original message.

On Sunday, the clinic itself issued the following statement:

 Cleveland Clinic is fully committed to evidence-based medicine. Harmful myths and
untruths about vaccinations have been scientifically debunked in rigorous ways. We
completely support vaccinations to protect people, especially children who are
particularly vulnerable. Our physician published his statement without authorization
from Cleveland Clinic. His views do not reflect the position of Cleveland Clinic and
appropriate disciplinary action will be taken.

Two years ago Dr. Neides sung the praises of a flu shot in a blog on the Cleveland.com
website, and he clearly believed in them enough to continue getting the shot.

Now as the dust settles, many in the medical community and mainstream media are rushing
to condemn him, while others are wondering whether his original message will be lost in the
process.

Neides Controversial Message: We Have a Clear Right to Question Vaccine Safety

As Dr. Neides reminds us in his original column, we live in an extremely toxic world. There
more than 80,000 chemicals in use today, and they are found in the air we breathe and the
food we eat; they are hiding in our personal care products and in our clothes.

Over time the toxic overload starts to take its toll on our health and then prescription pills
are given to mask the symptoms. Toxins are a big part of this equation, and theyre in our
drugs and vaccines in surprisingly high amounts.

When it comes to food, we can buy organic and direct from the farmer, or grow our own
food, to avoid pesticide exposure and preservatives. But unfortunately we are not given a
choice of medicine that is free of unnecessary toxins and additives.

This is exactly what Dr. Neides originally spoke out against in his controversial column,
taking a big-picture and holistic approach.

If we dont look outwe can expect to hear about more cancers, more autism, more auto-
immune diseases. he said.

In his editorial, Dr. Neides also touches on the controversial subject of a potential autism and
vaccinations link, which was originally raised by CDC Senior Scientist Dr. William S.
Thompson and mostly ignored by the media.

Does the vaccine burden as has been debated for years cause autism? I dont know
and will not debate that here, he said. What I will stand up and scream is that
newborns without intact immune systems and detoxification systems are being over-
burdened with PRESERVATIVES AND ADJUVANTS IN THE VACCINES.

Among the potentially toxic ingredients that may be found in a flu shot are:
formaldehyde, octylphenol ethoxylate, monobasic sodium phosphate, dibasic sodium
phosphate and monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium taurodeoxycholate, beta-
propiolactone, and many more. While not many know these names, these chemicals
include carcinogens and neurotoxins; they may be toxic to the reproductive system; they
have contributed to seizures, heart issues, allergic reactions, paralysis, severe
respiratory problems, and neurological disorders.
Vaccine and pharmaceutical companies argue that these toxins are not in high enough
doses to cause damage, and say that the benefits of vaccines outweigh any risk of harm
or sickness.

But considering that the government has paid out billions in damages since 1986 while
making it illegal to sue the makers, and that more vaccines are constantly being added to the
recommended schedule (for kids whose immune systems are often not properly developed),
the pitfalls of excess vaccines and vaccine additives are issues that clearly deserve more
attention.

Dr. Neides thinks the connection may be stronger than weve been led to believe:

Some of the vaccines have helped reduce the incidence of childhood communicable
diseases, like meningitis and pneumonia, Dr. Neides originally said. That is great news.
But not at the expense of neurologic diseases like autism and ADHD increasing at alarming
rates.

Dr. Neides states that there are vaccines that have been a life-saving tool to avoid spreading
of disease, but there are several issues with them that need to be addressed.

Vaccines need to be used properly, with full knowledge of proper and safe timing, and how
ones genetics interact with them. And the toxic additives still havent been properly
scrutinized or studied for safety.

Right now, especially with the looming specter of mandatory vaccines (California is leading
the way in this department), that issue is becoming paramount. And the issue of additives in
vaccines extends to our food supply and personal care products as well, he says:

The more mindful you are at reading labels, thinking about what you are ingesting, and
how you manage your stress will go a long way toward living a life free from chronic
disease. Never assume that products are safe just because they are on a store shelf, Dr.
Neides said.

The hospital has promised it will administer appropriate discipline to him for his column.
Ironically enough, what Dr. Neides ultimately hopes is that people will exercise their own
discipline when it comes to health, since were all in this together:

Together we will learn what to stay away from and what to consume, he said in his
original column. Become a voice for yourself and your family. Blind faith must become a
thing of the past. And by educating your loved ones, you will actually help society reduce the
chronic disease burden.

***

Have more questions about vaccine safety, efficacy, and their impact on your health? Watch a
FREE 9-part documentary Vaccines Revealed. Discover the most cutting edge news and just
released evidence from over twenty of the worlds authorities and experts, including
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Vaccines are Not for Public Health, Its
Really About Profit Former Merck
Sales Rep Reveals
by Yelena Sukhoterina | March 3, 2016

After learning the truth about vaccines former drug sales rep Brandy Vaughan speaks out at
rallies.

After seeing corruption first hand behind the scenes of Merck & Co. as a sales rep. for their
shockingly dangerous drug Vioxx (which killed tens of thousands of people), former
pharmaceutical sales rep Brandy Vaughan was disillusioned with the industry and left to live
in Europe for eight years, where she had her son.

When she brought him back to San Francisco at 6 months old and unvaccinated, she was met
with criticism and unsettling information about the mandatory vaccination push happening in
the state of California.

She said she did not know everything about vaccines at that time, but had done enough
research to not trust the pharmaceutical companies behind them. But the doctors who insisted
on vaccinating her son did not want to listen.
I asked to see a vaccine insert (because caregivers and patients receive two different
ones, believe it or not), and the doctor got very upset at me and claimed I didnt trust him. He
stormed out of the room, and the nurse let me know that I wasnt welcomed back she said
in a video posted by Larry Cook from StopMandatoryVaccination.com (available at the end
of the article).

She said it was a huge red flag for her and she dived deeper into researching vaccines, their
ingredients, and the safety data, which she found to be flawed.

Toxic Ingredients in Childhood Vaccines and Their Health-Damaging Effects

Thimerosal, aluminum and other toxic ingredients found in vaccines can cause serious
side ffects, which is why the government has paid out billions in damages since the
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act was passed in 1986. They range from headache,
fever, and nausea; to allergic reactions, seizures, severe pain, life-threatening severe
illness and permanent brain damage.

These toxins are especially dangerous for children with a not yet fully developed immune
system.

A full list of ingredients in different types of vaccines is available

here.

More information on the dangers of vaccine additives appears each year. Here are just
few things that we know:

Childhood Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccination can cause Acute
Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM) an intense swelling in the brain as it
was shown in the court case of Bailey Banks.

Representative from Florida Bill Posey spoke to the House of Representatives

and asked for an official investigation into purposefully omitted study findings
that examined the possibility of a relationship between [the] mumps, measles,
rubella vaccine and autism.

Children and adults experienced seizures and were paralyzed after the flu shots.

Extra-strength flu shots developed for seniors mentions dozens of deaths after
receiving the shot in its own insert.
The U.S. gives twice or more as many vaccines to children as most developed countries

US children receive significantly more vaccines than kids in other countries, especially
between birth and 6 years old. Source: VacTruth.com

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States recommends
the following vaccine schedule:

Birth to 15 months: up to 27 vaccinations (routine and catch-up schedules differ

slightly).
18 months to 18 years: 37 on average, can be more if the doctor decides the child needs
boosters or follow-ups, two doses of annual flu shots instead of one, or is at increased
risk of disease.

That makes an average of 64 vaccinations before the child turns 18.

Immunization schedules for other developed countries have much lower number of
vaccinations:

Public Health Agency of Canada recommends an average of 47 vaccinations before the

child turns 17.

National Health Service (NHS) in England recommends an average of 27 vaccinations

before the age of 18.

In Australia, the Government Department of Health recommends 18 immunizations

before the age of 15. Flu shots and a few other vaccines are recommended for at-risk
groups only.

United States Kids are Sicker than in Any Other Developed Country

The US has very high rates of childhood diseases comparing to other developed
countries.

It actually has the highest infant mortality rates among developed countries: 6.1 per
1,000 live births, comparing to 5.5 in New Zealand, 4.2 in the United Kingdom, and the
lowest 2.3 in Finland and Japan, CBS News Reported based on CDC statistics. The US
has also the second highest mortality rate for asthma (ages 5-34).

When it comes to mental health between 2005-2011, 6.8% of children aged 3-17 had an
ADHD diagnosis, 3.5% behavioral problems, 3% had anxiety, 2.1% depression, and
1.1% were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders, according to the CDC.

The neurotoxins in the vaccines have been associated with developing neurological
disorders including SIDS and hyperactivity.

In 2011-2012, 17.7% of children 6-11 years of age were obese, and the rates of diabetes
in children have increased by 21% between years 2000 and 2009, and as many as 30%
of children have allergies today (bovine casein derived from milk found in vaccines have
been linked to be one of the causes for the rise of food allergies).

Vaccines Can Be Approved Without Adequate Studies

The thing about vaccines is that you dont have to do the same rigorous safety studies as
you do for other pharmaceutical drugs because they are classified as a public health measure
versus the pharma drug, Vaughan said.

Looking at a vaccination insert, such as the one by Fluzone, it is apparent that the
vaccine has been approved after just two short clinical trials, which did not study the
long-term effects. There were no double-blind placebo-based studies done.
The vaccine manufacturers can get away with barely studying the product before taking
it to the market, because unlike other drug manufacturers they cannot get sued,
according to the NBC News.

Vaccines are not for public health, Vaughan stated in the video, which you can view below
(she recently launched a billboard campaign in California warning people of the risks):

9-year-old Paralyzed After a Flu Vaccine

and She Is Not The Only One
by Yelena Sukhoterina | November 18, 2015

Brianna Browning

On October 17, 9-year-old Brianna Browning was hospitalized just two days after receiving a
flu vaccination, reported FOX 59 TV. Hours after the shot, the fourth-grader started vomiting,
and later became paralyzed from the waist down and experienced complete blindness after
experiencing what though to be a seizure.

Brianna was diagnosed afterwards with Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM), a

rare infection of the brain, which has been previously concluded by the court as the disease
that can be caused by vaccinations (Bailey Banks v. Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services).
Like many kids injured by the vaccines, Brianna seemed perfectly healthy before
receiving the vaccination.

Paralysis caused by ADEM and Guillain-Barr Syndrome Linked to Vaccinations?

Although most people still havent connected the dots, there is a strong body of evidence
that being vaccinated can increase the chance of paralysis and other serious injuries.
Last year a 10-year-old Marysue Grivna was also paralyzed and lost the ability to
speak. She was shortly diagnosed with ADEM after receiving a flu shot, according to
multiple reports.

Research by the National Institutes of Health showed that about 5% of ADEM cases
happen in the month following receiving a vaccination.

ADEM is not the only condition that can cause paralysis after a flu shot. Guillain-Barr
Syndrome (GBS) is a rare disorder in which a persons own immune system damages
their nerve cells, causing muscle weakness and sometimes paralysis, according to CDC.
In 1976 scientists concluded that people who have received the 1976 swine influenza
vaccine had a higher chance of developing GBS.

The Morning Call, a local news source from Allentown, Pennsylvania, reported last year
that a 20-year-old nurse received $11.6 million in compensation (through the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program) for treatment after she was diagnosed with
GBS three weeks after receiving a flu shot, which left her partially paralyzed. The
woman was healthy and working before the vaccination.

Another woman, 45-year-old Kathy Watson-Jones, became paralyzed and received a

GBS diagnosis one day after a flu shot, reported

Daily Mail Australia. When she was considering side-effects associated with the flu shot
she said she thought she would get a cold at worst, nothing like this. In the last five
years, 16 cases of flu shots associated with GBS were reported to Australian
Government Department of Health.

The government bitterly contests these cases. They dont often concede them, said
Attorney David Carney.

Flu Vaccines Are Extremely Safe? Not so!

Dr. Umair Shah, the executive director of Harris County Public Health and Environmental
Services, who has not treated Brianna Browning, said flu shots are extremely safe reported
Fox News.

Fox News, of course, like any other mainstream station has to end the segment on that
sentence. It is as if they are saying: Forget everything we just said, ignore the girl who is still
paralyzed, do not ask questions, and go get your flu shot.

Looking at all the ingredients in the flu shots, they can be classified between somewhat
safe to how is this legal?
Many flu shots contain mercury (thimerosal), aluminum, and different preservatives,
toxins and antibiotics.

Thimerosal, which is 50% mercury by weight, is a neurotoxin, and can cause nerve
damage. There have been cases of mercury poisoning from products containing
thimerosal, according to the FDA.

Aluminum, another neurotoxin, can cause significant health issues such as dementia and
Parkinsons disease. Low doses of aluminum are found in household products and food.
An FDA study found that an infant receiving all of the recommended vaccines will be
exposed to 4.225 milligrams of aluminum before he or she turns one. Is that a low dose?

That depends on a row of factors: how much aluminum was in the baby at birth, how well the
kidneys work to flush out toxins, and how much aluminum the child received from other
sources in the environment. Recent scientific studies started questioning if any amount of
aluminum is safe at all. A 2011 article from Current Medicinal Chemistry stated that
aluminum adjuvants may carry a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation,
and neurological diseases.

In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of
potential adverse effects underestimated has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and
scientific community, wrote authors L. Tomljenovic and C. A. Shaw.

Flu-Shot Side Effects from Minor to Serious

According to the CDCs own website, inactivated influenza vaccine can cause soreness,
redness, or swelling at the injection site; hoarseness; sore, red or itchy eyes; cough,
fever, aches, headache, itching, and fatigue during the two days following the vaccine.

More serious side effects include the risk of GBS, seizures when getting pneumococcal
and/or DTaP vaccine at the same time, and a severe allergic reaction.

But besides this list of side effects, there is also an official list of symptoms and disorders
reported by the consumers, which are printed on the official flu shot instructions and warning
for the health professionals. Because all of them were reported after the drug was approved, it
has not been studied how many people experience these conditions after the vaccination.

For example, consumers who have received Fluzone experienced symptoms in almost
every body system: blood and lymphatic, immune, eyes, nervous system, vascular,
respiratory, skin, gastrointestinal and general disorders.

These disorders ranged from mild such as cough and vomiting to severe such as
thrombocytopenia (low platelet count can be life-threatening if bleeding occurs),
anaphylaxis (serious allergic reaction), vasculitis (inflammation of your blood vessels),
and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (life-threatening skin condition).

Considering that over $3 billion has been awarded for vaccine injuries since 1988
(which the U.S. Department of Human Resources freely admits on its website) along
with alarming cases like Briannas, is it any wonder that more and more people are
standing up for green vaccines and the right to choose? That will be up for debate in
the coming months, especially now that a bill, HR 2232, the Vaccine All Children Act,
could essentially mandate vaccinations for kids at schools across the country

I Want to Know the Truth: De Niro Calls

Out the Vaccine Industry on National TV
(with Video)
by Yelena Sukhoterina | April 13, 2016
There has not been a movie in recent history that has received as much backlash as
VAXXED: From Cover-Up to Conspiracy. Directed by Andrew Wakefield, who was one
of the first people to raise a red flag on the potential link between vaccines and autism,
the movie focuses on the interviews of pharmaceutical company insiders, doctors, politicians,
and parents whose children were injured by the vaccinations.

The movie was supposed to come out at the Tribeca Film Festival, and actor Robert De Niro,
who is one of the festivals founders, fully supported it.

Grace and I have a child with autism and we believe it is critical that all of the issues
surrounding the causes of autism be openly discussed and examined, De Niro stated.

Someone, likely a corporate interest group, called De Niro, and though we do not know what
was said, the conversation pushed De Niro to remove the movie from the line up. But they
did not manage to change De Niros mind.

Today, April 13th, on the day of the 15th year celebration of the Tribeca Festival, De Niro and
another festivals founder Jane Rosenthal were on TODAYs morning show, and De Niro has
defended the autism vaccine link:

I think [VAXXED] is something that people should seeThere is definitely something to

that movies, and there is another movie called Trace Amounts. There is a lot
of information about things that are happening with the CDC, the pharmaceutical
companies; there are a lot of things that are not said. I, as a parent of a child who has
autism, am concerned. And I want to know the truth.

And the truth is starting to slowly come out. The critics of the movie raised a storm calling
the movie dangerous and claimed that it is not based on facts. When in fact, it is dangerous
not to talk about what we already know.

If you are a scientist, lets see it, lets hear it. Everybody doesnt seem to want to hear much
about it. Its shutdown, said De Niro. And you guys [speaking to news casters] are the ones
that should be investigating.

And there is a lot to investigate.

After all, the Senior CDC Scientist Dr. William Thompson admitted that the study that was
meant to prove the MMR vaccine as safe saw a correlation between the vaccine and autism,
and this part of the study was purposefully destroyed, thrown into the garbage can
literally.

The co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study, he said.
Dr. Thompson himself kept the copies, but did not come forward with this information till
recently. When he did, U.S. Representative from Florida Bill Posey spoke to the House of
Representatives and asked for an official investigation.

We are just in the beginning of this fight for the truth, and those who are making bank
manufacturing vaccines do not want the truth to come out. But thankfully, those who know
the truth or have started to question what they have been originally told are starting to speak
up: De Niro, Jim Carrey, former pharmaceutical representatives, politicians, parents who
will be next?

Jim Carreys Controversial Vaccine Tweets

Backed by Undeniable Evidence
by Nick Meyer | September 7, 2015

By Yelena Sukhoterina
Actor and comedian Jim Carrey made quite a
splash this past summer when he turned to
Twitter to share his opinions on vaccinations after
Californias Governor Jerry Brown signed
the new S277 bill.
The legislation made it mandatory in California to
vaccinate schoolchildren, and eliminated the
exemptions for personal or religious beliefs.
Carrey posted numerous times that he is not
anti-vaccine but is rather anti-neurotoxin
and anti-mercury.
Carrey recently offered up the following
controversial Tweet.

Many mainstream news outlets covered the story

by telling Carrey to shut up, labeling him as an
anti-vaxxer and stating that someone who is an
actor cannot know science.
Yet there are a lot of doctors, especially
naturopaths of many different disciplines, who
share his concerns about vaccines. So lets take
an in-depth look at what his tweets were really
talking about, and the abundance of evidence
from the CDC and other sources backing them
up.
Robert Kennedy Jr. is an attorney and
author whose main subjects of interests are
protecting the environment. He recently
posted this graphic on his Facebook, an
unedited version of an article he wrote
about the book Thimerosal: Let The Science
Speak and the movie Trace Amounts.
He writes that he is pro-vaccine, as he
believes they save lives; but he is against
unnecessary and dangerous usage of
thimerosal in vaccines and what he says is
an unnecessary number of vaccines.
He states that while CDC recommended five
childhood vaccines in 1954, today children
receive 56 doses of 14 vaccines before
they turn 18. He states that in his opinion
and research the only reason for that is for
the pharmaceutical companies to make
money.

According to Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention (CDC), thimerosal has been used as a
preservative in vaccines since 1930s, and it does
contain mercury. Many vaccines became
thimerosal-free in 1999 as a precautionary
measure, but it is still used in one-third of all flu
vaccines and two childhood vaccines one DTaP
and one DTaP-Hib.
The CDC states that those vaccines do have
trace amounts of thimerosal.

Trace Amounts is a 2015 documentary by

directors Eric Gladen and Shiloh Levine
about the possible connection between
autism, mercury and vaccines. After Gladen
became sick at the age of 28 after receiving
a vaccination, he traveled the country
attempting to find out if what happened to
him might be similar to the kids who have
bad reactions to the vaccines.
Gladen eventually joined the discussion
about whether or not the vaccines
themselves are the problem, or if the
problem is their additives specifically
thimerosal and whether they can be
linked to autism.
One of the reasons for this questioning is the growing
number of kids with autism. Those born in 1992 had a 1-
in-150 chance of developing autism, those born in 2002 1-
in-68 according to CDC statistics.

In the movie the directors interview

scientists and physicians, parents of ill kids,
investigative reporters, a former NBC News
medical director and a retired congressman
to help them look for answers.
Another movie that came out this year
is Bought by Jeff Hays, and it explores
possible effects vaccines, GMOs and
medications have on health. One of the
stories it follows is of Porter, the autistic
son of Sarah Bridges from Minneapolis, MN.
The mother and son pairs lives were
forever altered after he turned four months
old, the same time he received a row of
vaccines.
Bridges filed a suit in 1994 through the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program (established in 1986 by
Congress), reported by Minnesota
Monthly and in 2011 she won the case and
subsequent settlement with the government
worth about seven million dollars.
The settlement stated that a combination of
childhood vaccines caused Porter to have
encephalopathy brain damage.

Bad Reactions to Vaccines are a Fact of Life

Vaccines can cause bad reactions,

sometimes life-threatening. As the CDC
states, like any medication, vaccines can
cause side effects.
Different vaccines have different side
effects. The side effects range from mild
such as headache, fever, and nausea; to
severe allergic reactions, seizures, and
severe pain. Rare but possible severe
reactions include life-threatening severe
illness and permanent brain damage.
Under Vaccine Safety page, CDCs website
states that Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System (VAERS) was put into place in 1990
for anyone to be able to report bad
reactions to vaccines. Anyone can view this
data since the sites creation.
CDC states that approximately 30,000
VAERS reports are filed annually, with 10-
15% classified as serious (resulting in
permanent disability, hospitalization, life-
threatening illnesses or death). By this
statistic, 3,000 to 4,500 people every year
become disabled for life or die as the result
of a reaction to a vaccine.
While CDCs studies show that the
percentage of bad reactions is small,
knowing that there is risk involved, some
parents do not want to take any risk that
can compromise their childs health for the
rest of their life or even kill them, and they
demand to have the right to opt out from
vaccinations, while others demand safer
vaccines.
The Case Against Mandatory Vaccines

A Petition to prohibit mandatory vaccination

laws collected 131,513 signatures this past
February. The petition states: No human
being should be FORCED to be vaccinated
against their will and/or personal/religious
beliefs.
The filmmakers of Trace Amounts also state
that they respect peoples decision to
choose whether or not to vaccinate
themselves or their dependents.
For many, that is the biggest argument.
Whether it is mercury or something else
that causes life threatening reaction to
vaccines, some parents do not want to take
any risk when it comes to the life and well-
being of their children.
Some will also argue that making any
health decision mandatory goes against the
American Medical Associations Code of Medical
Ethics:
Opinion 8.08 Informed Consent
The patients right of self-decision can be
effectively exercised only if the patient possesses
enough information to enable an informed
choice. The patient should make his or her own
determination about treatment.
Opinion 10.02 Patient Responsibilities (see link
here)
Like patients rights, patients responsibilities are
derived from the principle of autonomy. The
principle of patient autonomy holds that an
individuals physical, emotional, and
psychological integrity should be respected and
upheld. This principle also recognizes the human
capacity to self-govern and choose a course of
action from among different alternative options.
Autonomous, competent patients assert some
control over the decisions which direct their
health care. With that exercise of self-
governance and free choice comes a number of
responsibilities.
Acupuncture Outperforms Drugs For
Infertility, Promotes Pregnancy
07 February 2017

Researchers find acupuncture combined with clomiphene more effective than clomiphene
plus supplementary hormonal pharmaceuticals for the treatment of infertility. The
combination of acupuncture plus clomiphene produces significantly higher pregnancy rates
for women with anovulatory infertility than clomiphene plus estradiol cypionate and
dydrogesterone. The data was published in the report entitled Effects of Acupuncture on the
Endometrium in Anovulatory Cases Treated by Clomiphene: A Clinical Observation.
The addition of acupuncture to clomiphene therapy increased pregnancy rates, lowered the
resistance and pulsatility indices of the uterine arteries, and reduced the adverse effects
caused by clomiphene. The increase in positive patient outcomes combined with reductions
of adverse effects supports the research teams (Taian Maternal and Child Health Care
Hospital) conclusion, TCM [Traditional Chinese Medicine] can be either applied alone or
combined with Western medicine to up pregnancy rates and treat infertility. With the help of
TCM [i.e., acupuncture], treatment for infertility can be more effective while producing much
less adverse effects. [1]

Clomiphene triggers the pituitary gland to produce hormones that stimulate ovulation. The
upside of this medication is that it stimulates the release of eggs from the ovaries. The
downside is that it may produce adverse effects and it is contraindicated for patients with
endometriosis and uterine fibroids. Notably, it may increase the incidence of having twins or
triplets. The researchers conclude that the addition of acupuncture to the clomiphene
treatment regimen mitigates the drugs adverse effects and ups the pregnancy rate. Moreover,
the acupuncture protocol outperforms the clomiphene plus estradiol cypionate and
dydrogesterone protocol. Estradiol cypionate is an estrogen hormone and is often used for the
treatment of low estrogen levels. Estradiol cypionate may increase the rate of developing
blood clots, melasma (dark skin patches on the face), and may cause other adverse effects.
Dydrogesterone is a steroidal progestin used in many countries for the treatment of infertility
and threatened miscarriages.
The clinical study was conducted with a semi-protocolized approach to acupuncture point
selection. Identical primary acupuncture points were assigned to all patients and secondary
acupuncture points were prescribed based upon differential diagnostics. As a variable control,
secondary acupuncture point prescriptions were limited to one of three acupuncture point
groupings: liver qi stagnation, phlegm-dampness, blood stasis. Patients were not divided into
treatment and control groups based upon the diagnostic groups. Instead, they were randomly
divided into three groups and then diagnostic decisions were made for the addition of
secondary acupuncture points for the TCM treatment group.

A total of 43 patients were randomly distributed into three groups. Group 1 received only
clomiphene. Group 2 received clomiphene plus estradiol cypionate and dydrogesterone.
Group 3 received clomiphene plus acupuncture and moxibustion. The number of patients in
each group was 15, 14, and 14 respectively. Patients ranged from ages 2139. The preexisting
duration of anovulatory infertility ranged from 18 years.

Groups 1 and 2 received 50100 mg of clomiphene, once per day. Group 2 also received 1
mg of estradiol cypionate and 10 mg of dydrogesterone. Group 3 received clomiphene plus
acupuncture and moxibustion. The administration of care for all groups started on the 5th day
of menstruation and lasted for 5 consecutive days. One treatment course consisted of three
menstrual cycles. In total, 12 courses of treatment were applied. The TCM acupuncture
treatment protocol was as follows. Patients rested in a supine position. Upon disinfection, a
0.30 mm x 40 mm filiform needle was inserted into the following acupoints:

CV4 (Guanyuan)

CV3 (Zhongji)

Zigong

ST29 (Guilai)

SP6 (Sanyinjiao)

ST36 (Zusanli)

CV4, CV3, Zigong, and ST29 were inserted transverse-obliquely (15 angle) to a depth of 1
1.2 cm. SP6 and ST36 were needled perpendicularly and manipulated with the Ping Bu Ping
Xie (tonify and sedate) technique. Additional acupoints were administered based on
differential diagnostic patterns. For liver qi stagnation, the following acupoint was added:

BL18 (Ganshu)

For phlegm and dampness, the following acupoint was added:

ST40 (Fenglong)

For blood stasis, the following acupoints were added:

SP10 (Xuehai)
 LV2 (Xingjian)

Moxibustion sessions lasted 30 minutes and were applied at a heat intensity level until the
skin became flushed. Sessions were conducted once per day. Moxibustion was not applied
until 10 days passed after ovulation. Moxibustion was applied at the following acupoints:

Zigong

CV3 (Zhongji)

CV4 (Guanyuan)

ST29 (Guilai)

Additional research confirms that acupuncture combined with moxibustion is effective for the
treatment of infertility. Researchers conclude that acupuncture acts on the hypothalamus,
pituitary gland, and ovaries and regulates hormone levels in the body. [2, 3] Yu et al. conclude
that electroacupuncture can increase gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) levels and
increases sensitivity of the ovaries to gonadotropin. The study documents that
electroacupuncture is effective for the treatment of infertility in anovulatory cases with low
levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH).

In a related study, Xu et.al conclude that acupuncture combined with moxibustion increases
ovulation rates. [5] The treatment protocol was as follows. First, acupuncture was applied to
the following acupoints:

Zigong

CV3 (Zhongji)

CV4 (Guanyuan)

ST36 (Zusanli)

SP6 (Sanyinjiao)

LV3 (Taichong)

Additional acupoints were added based upon diagnostic patterns. For liver qi stagnation,
BL18 was added; for phlegm and dampness, ST40 was added; for blood stasis, SP10 and LV2
were added. Next, moxibustion was applied to Zigong, CV3, CV4, and ST36. Subsequently,
an electroacupuncture device was connected to the acupoints. The treatment was applied
daily for 37 consecutive days. The results of B-scan ultrasonography conducted during the
study documents that ovulation rates increase when acupuncture combined with moxibustion
is applied.

In another study, acupuncture has been found effective for increasing infertility rates for
women receiving IVF (in vitro fertilization) treatments. This highlights the role of
acupuncture in an integrative medicine environment. University of Maryland School of
Medicine researchers conclude that acupuncture increases pregnancy rates for women
receiving IVF. In a study of 16 high quality clinical trials consisting of 4,021 subjects,
acupuncture significantly raised pregnancy rates for women receiving IVF where otherwise
pregnancy rates would have been low.

Strong evidence indicates that acupuncture increases pregnancy rates for women with
anovulatory infertility and other forms of infertility. Acupuncture has been proven an
effective complementary therapy to drug therapy and IVF protocols. Research indicates that
acupuncture provides an additional benefit; it reduces the adverse effect rates of infertility
medications. Based on the findings of modern research, the use of acupuncture is an
appropriate, safe, and effective complementary therapy for the treatment of infertility.

References
1. Effects of Acupuncture on the Endometrium in Anovulatory Cases Treated by Clomiphene:
A Clinical Observation. Journal of Taishan Medical College. 2016, 37(9):1029-1031.
2. Yu J, Zheng HM, Bing SM. Changes in sSrum FSH, LH and Ovarian Follicular Growth
During Electroacupuncture for Induction of Ovulation [J]. Chinese Journal of Integrated
Traditional and Western Medicine. 1989, 9(4):199-202.
3. Sha GE, Huang WC, Ma RH. Acupuncture for Infertility: A Clinical Observation Based on
84 cases [J]. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion. 1998, 14(1):16-18.
5. Xu XF, Gu Y, Gu Ling, Zhu YP. Investigating Advantages of TCM Intervention for
Inducting Ovulation in Infertile Women [J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese
Medicine. 2012, 30(3):467-468.
6. Cao ZY. Obstetrics and Gynecology [M]. Beijing: People's Military Medical Publisher.
1999: 2474.
7. Manheimer, Eric, Danille van der Windt, Ke Cheng, Kristen Stafford, Jianping Liu, Jayne
Tierney, Lixing Lao, Brian M. Berman, Patricia Langenberg, and Lex M. Bouter. "The effects
of acupuncture on rates of clinical pregnancy among women undergoing in vitro fertilization:
a systematic review and meta-analysis." Human reproduction update (2013). University of
Maryland.

Welcome to Mother Rising! Check out the pregnancy support or the new mother support
pages. If you like what you see, subscribe here for free updates, or you can "like" the Mother
Rising Facebook page here and receive new posts in your news stream. My favorite place is
Pinterest... come pin with me! Thanks for visiting!

Surprise! Pitocin Is Linked to Postpartum

Depression | Mother Rising
February 3, 2017 By Lindsey Morrow 33 Comments

Pitocin, a synthetic form of oxytocin, is routinely given to women before, during an

immediately following birth to induce and augment labor and to also prevent and treat
postpartum hemorrhage. Much to the surprise of the medical community, a recent study
showed that Pitocin is linked to postpartum depression and anxiety.

The mothers arent surprised.

For women with a history of depression or anxiety prior to pregnancy, receiving Pitocin
increased the risk of postpartum depression or anxiety by 36%.

For women with no prior history of depression or anxiety, receiving Pitocin increased
their risk of postpartum depression or anxiety by 32%.

Let that sink in for a moment.

I Bet the Numbers Are Even Higher

While I pondered these incredibly high numbers, it occurred to me that the numbers may
actually be higher.

The information used in the research study came from women that received a diagnosis
and/or a psychotropic medication. What about those that didnt seek help?

In my experience, for whatever reason, many women do not seek professional help when
experiencing postpartum anxiety and/or depression.

How many anxious or depressed mothers never confide to their care providers about what
theyre feeling? Or even worse, were dismissed and told everything will be fine.

Its Not Just in Our Heads

Even if the numbers may be higher, the research as is, is incredibly validating. Ladies, what
you are feeling is not just in your head. Its real, and its a big problem (that society has no
idea how to handle).

*For a list of symptoms of postpartum mood disorders please visit Postpartum Progress.
(Postpartum Progress is a non-profit that aims to raise awareness, fight stigma and provide
peer support and programming to women with maternal mental illness.)

Pitocin Is Not the Same as Oxytocin

The strangest thing about the research study was that the hypothesis was the opposite of what
made sense to me as a mother and childbirth educator. The hypothesis suggested that
synthetic oxytocin, Pitocin, would in fact lower postpartum depression and anxiety.

The underlying assumption I am gathering is that, despite the evidence, medical professionals
believe that Pitocin is the same as oxytocin.
A few years ago I was attending a Pitocin induction at my local hospital. My doula client
was struggling BIG TIME with the sudden wave after wave of strong, painful contractions.
Her nurse, not knowing what else to do, told her, this is just labor, honey. As if what she
was experiencing were normal labor sensations. How sad.

Believe me, Pitocin does not feel warm and fuzzy, and isnt just like labor. My pitocin
augmentation birth was much harder than my first two births. For me, Pitocin made my
active labor phase feel like the transition phase, and lasted far longer than the transition
phases I had experienced in my non-Pitocin births.

Oxytocin is Needed to Mother Well

Oxytocin, on the other hand, is helpful for coping with stress, supporting emotional and
mental well-being and also helps with bonding which are absolutely necessary for a
successful transition to motherhood. (source)

Another study showed that women given Pitocin in labor had low oxytocin levels during
breastfeeding. This revealed that the exposure to Pitocin has consequences that last on into
mothering. (source)

What About the Baby?

If oxytocin is an important hormone for becoming a mother and synthetic oxytocin is linked
to postpartum depression, anxiety and low oxytocin during breastfeeding. I cant help but
wonder what about the baby?
If oxytocin effects how women transform into mothers, how is this synthetic hormone
affecting the baby?

How is the baby affected by synthetic oxytocin before, during and after labor?

Frighteningly, we have no idea.

Re-Examine Routine Procedures

If Pitocin is linked to postpartum depression and causes a lack of oxytocin during the
postpartum period, maybe its time to re-evlatulate the use of Pitocin as it pertains to each
woman. (Never mind the baby)

According to the CDC, induction has more than doubled from 1990 (10%) to 2010 (23%).
(source) However, just because a procedure is routine does not mean that its a good enough
reason to do it.

We Need More Research

Im not suggesting to eliminate Pitocin, as it is an important life saving tool in modern
obstetrics. (Shoot, Ive even experienced it first hand!) However, because the consequences
of routine childbirth interventions such as Pitocin on human maternal behavior have been
understudied, it would be wise to limit the use of Pitocin until further research is
completed.
And if Pitocin is deemed necessary, it would be wise and compassionate to provide quality
postpartum care, especially to those with high risk factors for postpartum depression.

What if care providers were required to pay for 40 hours of postpartum doula services to
women that received Pitocin? I bet wed quickly see the true motivations behind the
choices made in the care of new mothers.

Oxytocin is essential for our species to thrive as mothers. Our current methods meddle with
the mental health of these new mothers the backbone of society.

Is the crumbling mental health of new mothers important enough for us to take action?

Breaking Interview: Lead Author of 'Dirty

Vaccines' Study Speaks Out
Saturday, February 4th 2017 at 11:30 am
Written By:
James Lyons-Weiler
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2017
Visit our Re-post guidelines

A follow up from a recent report, "Dirty Vaccines: Every Human Vaccine Tested Was
Contaminated With Metals and Debris in New Study"
Breaking Interview: Lead Author of 'Dirty Vaccines'
Study Speaks Out
In a remarkable new study with potentially immediate and earth-shattering effects on the
vaccine industry and the regulatory agencies that oversee their safety, researchers at the
National Council of Research of Italy and the International Clean Water Institute, USA
have found extensive and inexplicable widespread contamination of vaccines with particles
that, according to the authors of the study, clearly should not be present.

The study, published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination, examined 30
vaccines (44 samples in total), and found particulate matter, in aggregates and clusters. The
composition of those clusters, the researchers say, are consistent with burnt waste. They
also found red blood cells of unknown origin, and extensive metal contamination, including
lead, chromium and tungsten.

These findings come at time when vaccines are under increasing attack for their likely
role in sudden-onset and long-term disorders, including autism, ADHD. HPV vaccines
have been linked to Guillan-Barre syndrome, premature ovarian failure (sterility).
There is also now a consistent pattern of reports of contamination of vaccines with
unwanted viruses and retroviruses, residue from human and pig tissues, and pathogens
like bacteria. And while ongoing controversies surround both the vaccine safety
science, the US District Court (Eastern Pennsylvania) is reviewing allegations that
Merck spiked human serum samples with rabbit antibodies to increase the apparent
efficacy of their MMR vaccine to avoid entry of competitors vaccines into the market.

The authors are certain that no contaminants of this type should be present in any
vaccine. In fact, in the one veterinary vaccine tested, the results came back clean no
particulates, aggregates, clusters, metals, or red blood cells.

Lead author Dr. Antonietta Gatti was kind enough to engage Dr. James Lyons-Weiler,
CEO of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (ipaknowledge.org), and author
of The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism (Skyhorse, 2016) in an interview
on their study.

JLW: Your study has remarkable finding that could have, and some say should have,
profound and immediate impact on public health policies around the globe. What was
your motivation for the study?

AG: In fact, we did not have any motivation, at least at the beginning. Our analyses on
vaccines started by accident about fifteen years ago when the university hospital of
Mainz (Germany) asked us to analyze samples of an anti-allergy vaccine they
administered. Their problem was the formation of painful swellings around the
injection point, and those wheals would not go away.

JLW: What did you find?

AG: With our electron-microscope technique we analyzed the samples of both vaccines
and wheals and found solid particles inside both of them. Those particles should not
have been there.
JLW: What were you most surprised to find?

AG: We had never questioned the purity of vaccines before. In fact, for us the problem
did not even exist. All injectable solutions had to be perfectly pure and that was an act
of faith on which it sounded impossible to have doubts. For that reason, we repeated our
analyses several times to be certain. In the end, we accepted the evidence.

JLW: What is the medical significance of finding aggregates and clusters in the vaccines
you studied?

AG: Certainly the particles, be they isolated, aggregated or clustered, are not supposed
to be there. They are foreign bodies our tissues cant recognize and, because of that,
they are perceived as potential enemies. The biological reactions are expected to be
fairly complicated, with macrophages that try to engulf them the way they do normally
with bacteria and parasites. Unfortunately, though, the particles we found then and
keep finding now in vaccines are not biodegradable. So, all macrophages efforts are
useless and, also depending on the chemical elements involved, the particles may be
especially toxic. Cytokines and pro-inflammatory substances in general are released and
a granulation tissue forms enveloping the particles. This involves inflammation, and, in
the long run, such a chronic condition can lead to cancer.

In the case of vaccines, besides the local problem we checked for Mainz, there are three
more possibilities: one, the most likely, is that those particles spread throughout the
body and, because of their small quantity in such a comparatively huge volume, they
dont immediately trigger any clinically visible reaction. The next, certainly rarer,
possibility is that they are carried by the blood and move to the central nervous system
and, more in particular, to some of the different compartments of the brain. Depending
on the point they reach, the reaction is obviously different. So, conditions like, among
others, autism are impossible to rule out a priori.

The last possibility is that particles or other contaminants reach the microbiota. In that
case, unlike what happens with the brain whose reactions become visible in a few hours,
nothing can be seen before weeks or a few months. The bacteria that form our
microbiota are essential to synthesize enzymes, many of which are indispensable for the
proper functioning of some of the numerous activities of the brain. If that is the case,
that production can be wrong and the chemistry of the enzymes be not what it should
be. The supply of enzymes containing, for instance, mercury or other pollutants takes
time to be delivered and thats why the reaction is not immediately detectable.

JLW: Who funded the study?

AG: Besides for very rare cases where groups of citizens have approach us to analyze
samples, and, once, a prosecutors office repaid our expenses, we put our own money
into this research.

JLW: How do you suppose those substances got into the vaccines?

AG: Thats a question we cant answer. The only way would be to be able to inspect the
laboratories where vaccines are produced, but no pharmaceutical company would allow
us. Generally speaking, GMP, i.e. the procedures of good manufacturing practice those
laboratories are obliged to follow, are focused on organic and biological matter, but
disregard inorganic particulate.

JLW: Can you tell us why you think it looks like a mixture of residues from "burnt
waste"?

AG: When you burn waste, the particles produced are made of different substances that
are rarely seen in combination. In some cases, unusual mixtures of different elements
are simply due to chance, depending on the atoms or small molecules that come
mutually in touch, and, at least in a number of circumstances we keep coming across,
particles with an odd composition is what is present also in vaccines. That does not
mean that the origin is the same.

JLW: Is there any reason why government agencies do not routinely perform such
screening?

AG: An embarrassing question. Do you mind if I dont answer?

JLW: Correct me if I'm wrong, but you reported that the veterinarian animal vaccine
was clean, but the human vaccines are contaminated. Why do you think this is so?

AG: As a matter of fact, Feligen, the only vaccine for veterinary use we analyzed,
proved to be free from particles. I have no explanation for that. The only thing I can say
is that it is evidently possible to produce a clean vaccine.

JLW: What do you say to people who are concerned that you didnt run any control
samples?

AG: I wonder how they can say that. Of course I did.

JLW: Do you think the aluminum levels in pediatric vaccines are safe?

AG: Aluminum is notoriously toxic. Babies are probably more likely to be affected by
levels of aluminum seen in vaccine, but aluminum is unsafe in any case.

JLW: What must be done about this?

AG: From my point of view, which is a merely technical one, its easy: you learn how to
check vaccines, you are properly taught to understand what you see and you forbid
polluted vaccines to be distributed. This would immediately ensure that producers take
appropriate counter-measures, for example by working in a truly clean environment
and by carrying out their analyses the way that should be done.

JLW: Is there anything else you would like the general public to know?

AG: The only things I can say is be properly informed and always ask for the evidence
of what you hear say. Always read the leaflets that are mandatorily contained in the
vaccine packaging and that the doctor is obliged to make you read. Always pose all the
questions that you feel like posing, and do not be satisfied if they do not really respond
to everything you want to know. Never make acts of faith and never trust who do. Dont
ever give your health, and the health of your children, to anyone.

Read more about the original study in a previous report:

Dirty Vaccines: Every Human Vaccine Tested Was Contaminated With Metals and
Debris in New Study

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD is a Pittsburgh-area scientist, lecturer, and author of Ebola,

An Evolving Story, who has worked collaboratively for over twenty years on over one
hundred research studies. Thanks to a Sloan Foundation fellowship, he was able to shift
focus to biomedical problems in cancer, diabetes, heart disease, infectious disease and
many other aspects of clinical, biomedical and translational research. Learn more on his
website.
19,340 Views
J.B. Handley added a new video: Vaccine adjuvants cause autoimmunity.
20 December 2016

Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld says vaccines cause auto-immunity. It's really not a question of
"IF" there are adverse events from vaccines, it's a question of "how often?", "how
severe?", and whether it's worth the trade-off? You can listen to the pre-eminent expert
on vaccine-induced autoimmunity in the world, or you can go to your mainstream
pediatrician who will tell you that vaccines have "no risk, lots of benefits." It's really up
to you!

This is just a clip from his talk, entire talk in comments below, as well as Dr. Shoenfeld's
new TEXTBOOK, called "Vaccines and Autoimmunity"!

By the way, "autoimmunity" includes all the crazy epidemics in our kids that weren't
around in the 1980s or earlier: asthma, food allergies, skin rashes, etc. "Some of the
main examples of autoimmune disorders include diabetes mellitus type 1 (IDDM),
systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Graves' disease of the
thyroid, Sjgren's syndrome, Churg-Strauss Syndrome, Coeliac disease, rheumatoid
arthritis (RA), and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purport."

Listen to Dr. Shoenfeld: "Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld is on the editorial board of 43 journals
in the fields of rheumatology and autoimmunity and is the founder and editor of the
Israel Medical Association Journal, the representative journal of science and medicine
in the English language in Israel. He is also is the founder and editor of Autoimmunity
Reviews and co-editor of The Journal of Autoimmunity. His clinical and scientific
works focus on autoimmune and rheumatic diseases, and he has published more than
1700 papers in journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine, Nature, the
Lancet, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, the Journal of Clinical Investigation, the Journal of Immunology, Blood, the
Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, the Journal
of Experimental Medicine, Circulation, Cancer, and others, and his articles have had
over 31,000 citations. He has written more than three hundred and fifty chapters in
books, and has authored and edited 25 books

Herd immunity vs. viral shedding: Whos

infecting whom?
Theres a big difference between naturally acquired herd immunity and vaccine-acquired herd
immunity

By Makia Freeman -
10.25.2016 @9:57 AM EST

Herd immunity, or community immunity as it is also known, is one of the main

arguments that pro-vaxxers (those advocating vaccination) advance to persuade
people to take vaccines. Herd immunity, so it is claimed, provides indirect protection to
the unvaccinated. How? Heres how the reasoning goes: if enough people get vaccinated,
when a contagious disease hits a community, it spreads less quickly than if the majority
were not vaccinated, since they are now protected. Thus, those unvaccinated few living
among the vaccinated many can now enjoy some protection because the disease is
finding it harder to spread and infect new individuals. This argument has many
assumptions and flaws, as we shall see.

Interestingly enough, in recent times a concept that is essentially the opposite of herd
immunity i.e. viral shedding has been in the news. You see, people using the argument of
herd immunity generally claim that the unvaccinated help speed the spread of a disease, even
encompassing those who got vaccinated. In other words, the unvaccinated can
infect the vaccinated. The phenomenon of viral shedding, on the other hand, is showing that
those who get vaccines get the virus in their body even if its weak or attenuated and the
virus then sheds, can become contagious and can start spreading. In other words, the
vaccinated can infect the unvaccinated. So which is the more true concept: herd immunity
or viral shedding? Whos infecting whom?

Vaccine-Induced Herd Immunity is Full of Assumptions

To get to the bottom of this question, you need to take a close look at this notion of herd
immunity. It contains the following assumptions:

1. Vaccines really are effective in protecting you against a disease;

 2. Once you get a vaccine, you are protected for a long time, or for life, against that
disease;

3. Vaccines protect you from getting infected and transmitting the disease;

4. Herd immunity can be acquired through vaccination just as it can be acquired

naturally (i.e. when a significant number of people in a community contract and
overcome a disease, and then have natural antibodies against it).

Take the first assumption of vaccine efficacy. The big flaw with the herd immunity
argument is that, by its very definition, it undermines the idea that vaccines actually work. If
vaccines really were effective at protecting you against a disease, why would you worry that
if those around got it, you would be more at risk or more in danger? If youre protected,
youre protected, right? If the vaccine provides you genuine immunity to a disease, as Big
Pharma, the CDC and the Western medical establishment like to claim, then it logically
follows that it should be of no consequence to your health if you are surrounded by 1 or 100
contagious people.

The only way around this is if you believe that vaccines are effective yet contraindicated for
some people, such as infants, pregnant women or the elderly. So you vaccinate yourself but
not your baby or your grandmother, and you worry for their health because there is not
enough herd immunity in your community. Given Big Pharmas propensity to ratchet up the
vaccine schedule on the entire population, there are not many people exempt anymore; take a
look at this chart on the right or at National Vaccine Information Center to see how the
schedule has changed over the last few decades for kids. However, even if you are in this
(rare) scenario, there are still problems with the idea of herd immunity.

Take the second assumption of supposed lifelong immunity. If herd immunity is really so
important to protect a community, that would presuppose that the vaccinated could fight off
the disease whenever it struck. So what happens after 5 years go by after you get your shot?
10 years? 20? 30? Even if you go and get your booster shots regularly, vaccine-induced
immunity still wears off after time.

Take the third assumption regarding the vaccinated being able to transmit disease. As
reported by Mercola in 2013, a FDA study concluded that those vaccinated against pertussis
or whopping cough could still carry and transmit the disease, even they got no symptoms. In
this case you become an asymptomatic carrier. This finding could bust a hole wide open in
the herd immunity argument. If the vaccinated can carry a disease, they are not adding to a
robust and protected herd.

Lastly, take the fourth assumption of vaccine-induced immunity vs. natural immunity.
Clearly, there is a world of difference between artificial vaccine-induced immunity, and
naturally-acquired immunity, attained through contracting and successfully fighting off a
disease. The human immune system is vastly more complex and sophisticated than we
understand, and is made up of specific and non-specific parts. A vaccine does not closely
resemble natural immunity in many ways, including only engendering a specific response,
having a completely different point of entry, not conferring lifelong immunity, etc. Besides,
immunity is far more mysterious than just a measure of antibody titers.

As Mercola writes:
The science clearly shows that theres a big difference between naturally acquired herd
immunity and vaccine-acquired herd immunity Vaccines are designed to trick your
bodys immune system into producing an immune response that includes making
protective antibodies that are needed to resist future exposure to the infectious viral or
bacterial microorganism. However, your body is smarter than that. The artificial
manipulation of your immune system by vaccines containing lab altered bacteria and
viruses, as well as chemicals and other ingredients, simply does not exactly replicate the
response that your immune system mounts when naturally encountering the infectious
microorganism. This is one reason why vaccine policymakers say you need to get
booster shots because vaccine acquired immunity is only temporary and wears off,
sometimes rather quickly.

Herd Immunity is a Pseudoscientific Myth

Dr. Russell Blaylock, an expert on the topic of excitotoxins who has spoken out against
the use of MSG in food, as well as the aluminum fallout from chemtrails/geoengineering
which can lead to brain damage and Alzheimers, writes:

If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should
the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with
50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not
existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-
induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other
medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.

The Danger of Viral Shedding

Herd immunity is a smokescreen for whats really going on. Its an inversion of the truth.
While Big Pharma and the medical establishment are pointing the finger at the unvaccinated,
it is actually the vaccinated who are contributing to the spread of disease.

The real issue is viral shedding. Viral vaccines are vaccines containing live viruses, even
if they are weak or attenuated strains. These live viruses shed for varying amounts of time in
the body fluids of a vaccinated individual and can be transmitted to others. You can
absolutely catch the virus (or bacterium) from someone who has just been vaccinated against
that disease. Not only that, but viral shedding from vaccines is leading to viral and bacterial
mutations, helping to create a phenomenon of new and dangerous strains of disease which
can evade treatment by becoming accustomed to whatever drugs get thrown at them.

As Dave Mihalovic writes:

Bird flu is rampaging across the Midwestern US. So far 13 million chickens and turkeys
have been culled or earmarked for destruction to stop the spread of H5N2, an offspring of
Asias H5N1 bird flu vaccinated poultry spread the virus without getting sick, making its
spread invisible. Vaccination has moreover driven the evolution of H5N1as these viruses
adapt to the vaccinated birds.
In his article he quotes Barbara Loe-Fisher, co-founder and president of the National
Vaccine Information Center (NVIC):
The live polio vaccine, the Sabin vaccine, which followed the inactivated Salk vaccine,
was given orally [and] contains live attenuated polioviruses. Those polioviruses, when
you take that [live] vaccine, you shed them in your body fluids your saliva, urine, and
stool. Vaccine-strain viruses like disease viruses or infections can be found also
sometimes in tears and vomit. This is true for the Ebola virus as well. Whether you have
the viral infection or you get the live attenuated vaccine, you shed live virus in your
body fluids and you are able to transmit the virus to other people who come in contact
with your body fluids [my emphasis]. I think this is a very important thing for people to
understand.

Alert: Taking Vaccines Can Genetically Modify You and Generations to Come

We are already under numerous environmental assaults, including excessive radiation and
GMOs, which are threatening to mutate our DNA. An article in Mother Jones reported that
toxins can actually act upon your DNA and change it, at the epigenetic level.

Researchers from Washington State University, led by biology professor Michael

Skinner, reported last month that short-term exposure of pregnant rats to several kinds
of chemicals caused ovarian disease not just in their daughters but also in two
subsequent generations of females.

As Jon Rappoport suggests:

We are talking about lasting genetic changes, from parents to children, down the line. There
is every reason to believe that injecting chemical toxins (in vaccines) would have a still
greater permanent effect than, say, breathing pesticides.

Remember, in addition to containing viruses that can shed, vaccines are full of toxic
adjuvants (including aborted fetal tissue) which are provably carcinogenic (like the
cancer-causing monkey virus SV-40) or at the very least highly harmful. We know the
scientific evidence has being infiltrated by industry-funded studies and that the peer-
review process has been hijacked.

A vaccines ability to lead to viral shedding, group infection, genetic mutation of you
and genetic mutation of your future offspring turns the false idea of vaccine-induced herd
immunity on its head. The question was asked: who is infecting whom? The evidence
would strongly suggest that it is the vaccines and the vaccinated who are causing the
problem and spreading the disease.

Scream #191: Safety of quadrivalent live

attenuated influenza vaccine
by VacLib1 | Mar 8, 2017 | Scream of the week | 0 comments

March 1, 2017 - Safety of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in subjects aged 2
49 years (full text) "Hypersensitivity and seizures/convulsions were examined during a time
period that included the day of vaccination (day 0). From clinical databases, it was not
possible to determine whether an event occurring on the day of vaccination began
before or after vaccine administration; for the current analysis, it was presumed that
hypersensitivity and seizures/convulsions recorded on the day of vaccination were not
likely to have been diagnosed as a first event just prior to receiving an immunization,
and so were much more likely to have occurred after vaccination.

Conflicts of Interest:
Disclosure Roger Baxter, Abigail Eaton, John Hansen, and Laurie Aukes are employees of
Kaiser Permanente.
In addition, Roger Baxter has received research grants for unrelated studies from
Sanofi Pasteur, GlaxoSmithKline, Protein Sciences, Merck, and Pfizer. Herve Caspard
and Christopher S. Ambrose are full-time employees of AstraZeneca.

Funding
This study was sponsored by MedImmune, the global biologics research and development
arm of AstraZeneca.

Role of the funding source

MedImmune/AstraZeneca participated in the study design, review, and interpretation of study
data, and development of the manuscript. The investigative site conducted all other study
activities including collection and analysis of the data.

Comment: The new quadrivalent flu shot is similar to the FluMist, the nasal flu vaccine
except for no apparent reason an additional strain of influenza B has been added. On
average, influenza B is responsible for about 25% of laboratory-documented influenza. And,
according to CDC data over the last 19 years, influenza-like illness is actually caused by
influenza viruses only 15% of the time. So, all this fuss it an attempt to eliminate 25% of 15%
of influenza illness (3.75%)

Oh yea.and the study was funded by MedImmune/AstraZeneca.the same company that

will manufacture and distribute the 4-virus nasal flu vaccine. Declaring conflicts of interest
doesn't negate them.

This entire study is the epitome of the quote attributed to Mark Twain: Figures dont lie, but
liars figure. The numbers have been used to manipulate away the side effects. Just Say No
again.

1 star scream sigh/eyes rolling

2 star scream aggravating

3 star scream gut wrenching and sad

4 star scream unbelievable what's next?

5 star scream I'm outraged! Take action! The 5-star screams will be posted far and wide,
sent out to radio, print, journalists and television outlets. You will get to help us determine
what information needs to be broadcast to the world.

A woman becomes pregnant.

She is pressured and often forced to get the flu shot and TDap.
If she is rh- blood type, she is pressured to get rhoGAM injections.
She receives multiple ultrasounds.
She may receive antibiotics for group B strep.
If the doctor has a vacation scheduled during the week of her presumed delivery date,
she is pressured to induce.
If she doesn't dilate as expected after being induced, she is pressured and sometimes
forced to deliver via C-section.
She is drugged and exhausted and handed a clipboard with papers to "initial here and
sign here."
Her baby is injected with synthetic vitamin k at 20,000 times the rate normal for a
newborn, and with either 9 mg benzyl alcohol or 10.5 mg Polysorbate 80, both of which
are toxic, within minutes of delivery.
Baby is then injected with hepatitis B vaccine, with 250 mcg aluminum.
Baby won't nurse.
Baby is lethargic.
Baby is not interested in his environment.
Baby is colicky.
Baby is irritable and doesn't sleep.
Mom is worried and asks the doctor for guidance.
Doctor tells mom: "Don't worry so much. This is normal. You're just a new, nervous
mother."
Doctor goes back to his/her vacation.
Mother has just begun the lifelong and relentless reality of dealing with the outcome of
"the advances modern medicine."

~Marcella Piper-Terry

.
Breastfeeding Saves Mothers Lives,
09/29/2016
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. Breastfeeding as recommended for a total of one year and
exclusively for six months could protect babies and their moms from premature death and
serious diseases and save the U.S. more than $4.3 billion in health care and related costs,
according to a new study published online in Maternal & Child Nutrition.

Study authors said their findings underscore the importance of providing women with the
support they need to breastfeed their babies, beginning at birth.

Breastfeeding has a greater impact on womens health than previously appreciated, said
lead author Melissa Bartick, MD, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School
and a hospitalist at Cambridge Health Alliance. The results should lead to policies that help
support women to breastfeed longer and help exclusive breastfeeding, such as paid family
leave, workplace support and evidence-based maternity practices around infant feeding.
For the study, the research team modeled two groups. One was an optimal group, in
which the majority of moms breastfed as recommended: for a total of one year and
exclusively for six months. That group was compared with a suboptimal group, in
which moms breastfed at current rates in the U.S., which are less than the recommended
guidelines. Using existing research and government data, they projected the rates and costs of
diseases that breastfeeding is known to reduce, along with the rates and costs of early deaths
from those diseases.

Childrens diseases included in the evaluation were acute lymphoblastic leukemia, ear
infections, Crohns disease, ulcerative colitis, gastrointestinal infections, lower
respiratory tract infections, obesity, necrotizing enterocolitis and SIDS. For mothers, the
study included breast cancer, pre-menopausal ovarian cancer, diabetes, hypertension
and heart attacks.

The researchers found that suboptimal breastfeeding was associated with more than
3,340 premature deaths in the U.S. each year, costing the nation $3 billion in medical
costs, $1.3 billion in indirect costs and $14.2 billion in costs related to premature deaths.
The majority of the excess death and medical costs nearly 80 percent were
maternal.

Breastfeeding has long been framed as a child health issue, however it is clearly a womens
health issue as well, said study co-author Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, professor of medicine
at UC Davis Health System. Breastfeeding helps prevent cancer, diabetes and heart
disease, yet many women have no idea breastfeeding has any of these benefits.

The study results underscore the importance of policies that make it possible for women to
breastfeed, according to study senior author Alison Stuebe, distinguished scholar of infant
and young child feeding at the Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute and associate
professor of obstetrics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Currently, 22% of employed mothers return to work within 10 days of birth, Stuebe said.
Paid leave keeps mothers and babies together, which is essential for breastfeeding. Enacting
paid family leave will impact the lifelong health of women and children.

Additional study authors were Brittany Green of the University of Cincinnati, Briana
Jegier of DYouville College in Buffalo, Arnold Reinhold of Alliance for the Prudent Use
of Antibiotics in Boston, Tarah Colaizy of the University of Iowa, Debra Bogen of the
University of Pittsburgh and Andrew Schaefer of Rice University in Houston.

The research was funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

The study is available online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mcn.12366/full.

USA: Highest Vaccination Rate in the World Has the

Worst Health
by PAUL FASSA

That worst health label includes a ranking of 34th in the world with infant mortality. In
other words, the USA has the 34th worst infant survival with its highest rate of
vaccinations. Some are directly from multiple vaccinations administered.

But the USA leads the world in infant vaccinations, those administered during the first year
after their births 26 vaccinations during that time.

The only vaccination I recall receiving during early childhood, circa 1948, was the smallpox
vaccine, the one that left a circle of shallow pockmarks on the upper arm, a non-ink
tattoo that proved you had received that vaccine. Months later there was the booster
shot which gave me a vacation of several days away from my first grade teacher while
sitting out the chicken pox.

During Naval training the mass vaccination high pressure hand held gun that replaced
syringes and needles was tried on us with the polio shot. I wound up with a vacation in the
base infirmary with an extended period of the flu. Between those two, there may have been a
tetanus shot or two.

From the Healthy Home Economist:

-In1950, there were 3 childhood vaccines typically given when a child entered school.

-In 1983, there were 10 recommended vaccines by the age of 6 years old (24 doses, 7
injections, 4 oral doses for polio).

-In 2010, the CDC vax schedule totaled 68 doses with more than half given by the time a
child was only a year and a half old.

-In 2016, the schedule has increased to 74 doses by age 17 with 53 injections and 3 oral
doses of rotavirus.
 The number of vaccines included in the
current childhood vaccine schedule has quadrupled over the past 60 years, with several
demanding multiple injections and boosters. During this exponential rise of CDC
recommended schedules, the health of American children has plummeted.

Autoimmune diseases, learning disabilities, food allergies, chronic ailments, and childhood
obesity have all risen. The overall health of this nation ranks very low compared to all other
industrialized nations, dead last in most areas.

Vaccine false dogma is so heavy hardly anyone with authority, even in mainstream media,
makes the connection between poor health with high vaccination rates. Instead, more, three
added for 2016, are getting enforced by mandate or coerced by pediatricians who have the
right to refuse medical care on kids who arent vaccinated.

Destroying Health with Vaccines is Good Business

In 1986, after the swine flu shot debacle of

1976, pharmaceutical companies lobbied and helped write the legislation that
guaranteed they couldnt get sued for vaccine adverse effects, damages, and deaths.

That legislation created the vaccine court where vaccine damages would be
compensated to parents of vaccine injured children if they could prove the injuries were
vaccine caused. Its a cumbersome system set-up outside of the tort court system,
without juries of peers, to determine who gets settlements supplied by surcharge taxes
on vaccines sold.

So we have large sociopathic pharmaceutical companies making big bucks from worthless
protections against minor diseases, which often create collateral damage thats considered
worth the greater good of herd immunity. All nonsense. But its a great business profit
oriented model.

The trail of worsened health among children lines up even more business for pharmaceutical
companies and the academic sociopaths that that benefit from checkbook research, that is
getting the results Big Pharma wants for getting their toxic solutions to market

News, commentary, and advice to improve your health.

How Much Money Do Pediatricians Really

Make From Vaccines?
If you want to be sure your pediatrician has your childs best interest, this is mandatory
reading. Pediatricians around the country have begun refusing to accept families who opt out
of some or all vaccines. Thanks to a tip sent to Wellness & Equality by a reader, now
we know why.

When my friends child suffered a life-threatening reaction to a vaccine a week after her first
birthday, my friend assumed her pediatrician would write her a medical exemption from
future vaccines. Shortly after receiving a routine set of vaccines, the happy, vibrant one-year-
old spiked a 106 degree fever, began having seizures, and was hospitalized. When the
unexplained illness passed after a week in the hospital, the little girl had lost her ability to
walk. My friend describes how her daughter, who had learned to walk several months earlier
at 9 months, suddenly stumbled around like a drunk person for weeks following the
vaccines. My friend met with a team of pediatricians, neurologists, and
naturopathic doctors, and they agreed: Her daughter had suffered a brain injury caused
by a reaction to one of the vaccines. Hoping the injury would be temporary and that she
might recover and ease her brain inflammation if they could help her small body quickly
eliminate the vaccine additives that caused the reaction, my friends daughter underwent an
intensive detoxification program overseen by a nutritionalist. Slowly, her daughter relearned
to walk.

My friend is a practicing attorney who graduated from a Top 10 college. The evidence
was overwhelming that her daughters reaction had been caused by vaccines, she told
me.

But a few months later, when she took her daughter back into the pediatrician for a
visit, he wanted to vaccinate her daughter again. She was baffled. Why?

After a reader sent us a link to a PDF file of Blue Cross Blue Shields Physician
Incentive Program available online, Wellness & Equality learned that insurance
companies pay pediatricians massive bonuses based on the percentage of children who
are fully vaccinated by age 2.
So how much money do doctors really make from vaccines? The average American
pediatrician has 1546 patients, though some pediatricians see many more. The vast
majority of those patients are very young, perhaps because children transition to a
family physician or stop visiting the doctor at all as they grow up. As they table above
explains, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays pediatricians $400 per fully vaccinated child. If
your pediatrician has just 100 fully-vaccinated patients turning 2 this year, thats
$40,000. Yes, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays your doctor a $40,000 bonus for fully
vaccinating 100 patients under the age of 2. If your doctor manages to fully
vaccinate 200 patients, that bonus jumps to $80,000.

But heres the catch: Under Blue Cross Blue Shields rules, pediatricians lose the whole
bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated, and that includes the flu
vaccine. So its not just $400 on your childs headit could be the whole bonus. To your
doctor, your decision to vaccinate your child might be worth $40,000, or much more,
depending on the size of his or her practice.

If your pediatrician recommends that your child under the age of 2 receive the flu vaccine
even though the flu vaccine has never been studied in very young children and evidence
suggests that the flu vaccine actually weakens a persons immune system over the long term
ask yourself: Is my doctor more concerned with selling me vaccines to keep my child
healthy or to send his child to private school?.
https://scontent.fcmb3-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-
9/15284951_1433391640011891_2379202198821932214_n.jpg?
oh=af4946b613f1873da8acb9f9bd3e62e0&oe=592FFA83
Beware of Antibiotics in Breastfed Babies
by Rita Brhel on June 25, 2016

The next time your breastfed or recently weaned baby gets an ear infection, talk to his
health care provider about not being so quick to prescribe antibiotics if possiblebecause
while antibiotics may provide quick relief for the short-term, the research doesnt bode well
in the long-term.

A Finnish study, published June 13 in JAMA Pediatrics, has found a rather disturbing
association between antibiotic use in breastfed babies, or babies within 4 months of their
weaning, and their risk of more infections and obesity in the future.

Of the 226 Finnish children studied, 97% were breastfed for at least 1 month and on average
for 8 months. Each month of breastfeeding reduced the average number of post-weaning
antibiotic courses that child required.

But more importantly, I think, babies breastfed 0-6 months without any antibiotic use as well
as babies breastfed 8-16 months with antibiotic use both had fewer populations of the good
bacteria, Bifidobacterium and Akkermansia, compared with babies breastfed for longer
duration (8-16 months) without antibiotic use.

From what it appears, antibiotics negate some of the benefits of breastfeeding even
with babies who are breastfed exclusively and for longer duration.

It all comes down to the gut microbiome the microscopic ecosystem going on in our
babys intestines that not only determines how we metabolize our food but also fortifies our
bodys immunity.

You read that right: A huge part of our immune system depends on the specific mix of
microbes colonizing our gut.
And where do we get our gut microbial mix? There are different factors affecting our unique
blend everyones gut microbiome is different, just like our fingerprints but the
microbes that make up our individual mix are introduced during vaginal childbirth and
breastfeeding.

Or, lack thereof Cesarean births and formula-only feeding dont introduce much of a
microbial diversity, but that low diversity does affect how a babys gut immunity works.

As Katri Korpela, lead researcher at Finlands University of Helsinki immunobiology

program, explained to HealthDay News, a breastfed infant receives bacteria from the mother
as well as specific sugar components that promote the growth of certain gut bacteria. This
doesnt happen with formula.

Breastfeedings effect on a persons lifelong gut microbiome has been a hot topic the last few
years. This study further supports that breastfeedings health benefits are rooted to how it
helps a baby develop intestinal bacteria.

This study also shows that antibiotics appear to disrupt that development.

Furthermore, its suspected that breastfeeding protects against obesity by establishing a

healthy gut microbiome that then regulates how the gut handles food and feelings of fullness.
So breastfeeding but also antibiotics puts a baby at risk of obesity, too.

The bad news doesnt stop there. This dysfunction, according to Italys University of Salerno
pediatric gastroenterologist Pietro Vajro, may cause chronic inflammation in the bloodstream
characteristic of not only obesity but other chronic, related conditions such as fatty liver
disease and metabolic syndrome.

Almost every woman can relate to developing a yeast infection following a course of
antibiotics. Basically, the antibiotics kill all the bacteria, good and bad, and without the good
bacteria to keep the yeast in check, they overgrow. A yeast infection is a yeast overgrowth.
Antifungal medication knocks back the yeast to allow the good bacteria to re-colonize, which
keeps the yeast balanced.

This is similar to what happens in a babys gut when given antibiotics the antibiotics kill
all the bacteria, bad and good, upsetting the just budding gut microbiome and potentially
changing the trajectory of babys gut, immunity and long-term health.

While this study stresses that it does not show a direct cause-and-effect between antibiotic
use and increased infections and eventual obesity in breastfed babies, I would hope that it
does give mothers and health care providers pause before prescribing that next
antibiotic for an infection may be able to resolve without such aggressive treatment.

One of my favorite facts about breastfeeding and one I regularly share with WIC clients in
the peak of the cold and flu season is how the antibodies in breastmilk detect pathogen
exposure on babys saliva and literally change in real time to give better immunity to baby.
Maybe its time to give breastfeeding more of a chance before jumping straight to an
antibiotic Rx?

Share (356)
Tweet
Comments

Rita Brhel

Rita Brhel, BS, CLC, is the Executive Editor for Attachment Parenting International, a WIC
Breastfeeding Peer Counselor, and a freelance writer. She and her husband, and their 3
children, live near Hastings, Nebraska, USA

Day two of the midwifery

conference Grace Ma talks about
birth positions in Taiwan. Look at
animals, they are never on their
back
What the News Isnt Saying About Vaccine-
Autism Studies
by sattkisson

on November 27, 2016

This story was updated Nov. 27, 2016 to add results of new survey of vaccinated vs.
unvaccinated children
[The following news analysis and commentary was first published Dec. 31, 2015]

A new study this week found no link between vaccines and autism. It instantly made
headlines on TV news and popular media everywhere. Many billed it as the final word, once
again, disproving the notion that vaccines could have anything to do with autism.

What you didnt learn on the news was that the study was from a consulting firm that lists
major vaccine makers among its clients: The Lewin Group.

That potential conflict of interest was not disclosed in the paper published in The New
England Journal of Medicine; the study authors simply declare The Lewin Group operates
with editorial independence.

(As an aside, according to OpenSecrets.org, The Lewin Groups parent company,

UnitedHealth Group, is a key government partner in Obamacare. Its subsidiary QSSI was
given the contract to build the federal governments HealthCare.gov website. One of its top
executives and his family are top Obama donors.)

Conflicts of interest alone do not invalidate a study. But they serve as important context in the
relentless effort by pharmaceutical interests and their government partners to discredit the
many scientists and studies that have found possible vaccine-autism links.

Many Studies Suggest Possible Vaccine-Autism Links

When the popular press, bloggers and medical pundits uncritically promote a study like The
Lewin Groups, it must confound researchers like Lucija Tomljenovic, Catherine DeSoto,
Robert Hitlan, Christopher Shaw, Helen Ratajczak, Boyd Haley, Carolyn Gallagher, Melody
Goodman, M.I. Kawashti, O.R. Amin, N.G. Rowehy, T. Minami, Laura Hewitson, Brian
Lopresti, Carol Stott, Scott Mason, Jaime Tomko, Bernard Rimland, Woody McGinnis, K.
Shandley and D.W. Austin.

They are just a few of the many scientists whose peer-reviewed, published works have found
possible links between vaccines and autism. But unlike The Lewin Groups study, their
research has not been endorsed and promoted by the government and, therefore, has not been
widely reported in the media. In fact, news reports, blogs and medical experts routinely
claim no such studies exist.

To be clear: no study to date conclusively proves or disproves a causal link between vaccines
and autism anddespite the misreportingnone has claimed to do so. Each typically finds
either (a) no association or (b) a possible association on a narrow vaccine-autism question.
Taken as a whole, the research on both sides serves as a body of evidence.

The Astroturf Propaganda Campaign

Its theoretically possible that all of the studies supporting a possible link between vaccines
and autism are wrong. And, if the propagandists are to be believed, each of the researchers is
an incompetent crank, quack, nut or fraud (and, of course, anti-vaccine for daring to dabble
in research that attempts to solve the autism puzzle and leads to vaccine safety issues). The
scientists and their research are controversial, simply because the propagandists declare
them to be.
The disparaged scientists include well-published neurologists, pharmacists, epidemiologists,
immunologists, PhDs, chemists and microbiologists from places like Boston Childrens
Hospital, Horizon Molecular Medicine at Georgia State University, University of British
Columbia, City College of New York, Columbia University, Stony Brook University Medical
Center, University of Northern Iowa, University of Michigan, University of Arkansas for
Medical Sciences, Arkansas Childrens Hospital Research Institute, Al Azhar University of
Cairo, Kinki University in Japan, the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,
Swinburne University of Technology in Australia, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in
Poland, Department of Child Health Care, Childrens Hospital of Fudan University in China,
Utah State University and many more.

Their work is, at best, ignored by the media; at worst, viciously attacked by the predictable
flock of self-appointed expert science bloggers who often title their blogs with the word
science or skeptics to confer an air of legitimacy.

This astroturf movement, in my opinion, includes but is not limited to: LeftBrainRightBrain,
ScienceBlogs, NeuroSkeptic, ScienceBasedMedicine, LizDitz, ScienceBasedMedicine,
CrooksandLiars, RespectfulInsolence, HealthNewsReview, SkepticalRaptor, Skepticblog,
Skeptics.com, Wired, BrianDeer, SethMnookin, Orac, Every Child by Two, the vaccine
industry supported American Academy of Pediatrics, and the government/corporate funded
American Council on Science and Health (once called Voodoo Science, Twisted
Consumerism by the watchdog Center for Science in the Public Interest).

This circle operates with the moral support of the vaccine industry and its government
partners, citing one anothers flawed critiques as supposed proof that each study has been
debunked, though the studies continue to appear in peer-reviewed, published journals and
in the governments own National Institutes of Health library.

Weak, too small, haphazard, not replicated, junk science, flawed, unrelated,
declare the propagandists, without exception. Just as attackers spent years challenging any
study that linked tobacco to lung cancer.

They know that reporters who dont do their homework will conduct an Internet search, run
across the blogs with science-y sounding names, and uncritically accept their word as if its
fact and prevailing thought.

CDC claims no link between vaccines and autism

A Small Sampling

Many of the studies have common themes regarding a subset of susceptible children with
immunity issues who, when faced with various vaccine challenges, end up with brain damage
described as autism.

Permanent brain damage is an acknowledged, rare side effect of vaccines; theres no

dispute in that arena. The question is whether the specific form of autism brain injury after
vaccination is in any way related to vaccination.

So what are a few of these published studies supporting a possible link between vaccines and
autism?
As far back as 1998, a serology study by the College of Pharmacy at University of Michigan
supported the hypothesis that an autoimmune response from the live measles virus in MMR
vaccine may play a causal role in autism. (Nothing to see here, say the critics, that study is
old.)

In 2002, a Utah State University study found that an inappropriate antibody response to
MMR [vaccine], specifically the measles component thereof, might be related to
pathogenesis of autism. (Flawed and non-replicable, insist the propagandists.)

Also in 2002, the Autism Research Institute in San Diego looked at a combination of vaccine
factors. Scientists found the mercury preservative thimerosal used in some vaccines (such as
flu shots) could depress a babys immunity. That could make him susceptible to chronic
measles infection of the gut when he gets MMR vaccine, which contains live measles virus.
(The bloggers say its an old study, and that other studies contradict it.)

In 2006, a team of microbiologists in Cairo, Egypt concluded, deficient immune response to

measles, mumps and rubella vaccine antigens might be associated with autism, as a leading
cause or a resulting event.

A 2007 study found statistically significant evidence suggesting that boys who got the triple
series Hepatitis B vaccine when it contained thimerosal were more susceptible to
developmental disability than unvaccinated boys.

Similarly, a 5-year study of 79,000 children by the same institution found boys given
Hepatitis B vaccine at birth had a three times increased risk for autism than boys vaccinated
later or not at all. Nonwhite boys were at greatest risk. (Weak study, say the critics.)

A 2009 study in The Journal of Child Neurology found a major flaw in a widely-cited study
that claimed no link between thimerosal in vaccines and autism. Their analysis found that
the original p value was in error and that a significant relation does exist between the blood
levels of mercury and diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder.

The researchers noted, Like the link between aspirin and heart attack, even a small effect can
have major health implications. If there is any link between autism and mercury, it is
absolutely crucial that the first reports of the question are not falsely stating that no link
occurs.

(Critics: the study is not to be believed.)

FDA list of thimerosal-containing vaccines

A 2010 rat study by the Polish Academy of Sciences suggested likely involvement of
thimerosal in vaccines (such as flu shots) in neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism.
(The critics dismiss rat studies.)

In 2010, a pilot study in Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis found that infant monkeys
given the 1990s recommended pediatric vaccine regimen showed important brain changes
warranting additional research into the potential impact of an interaction between the MMR
and thimerosal-containing vaccines on brain structure and function.
A study from Japans Kinki University in 2010 supported the possible biological plausibility
for how low-dose exposure to mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines may be
associated with autism.

A 2011 study from Australias Swinburne University supported the hypothesis that sensitivity
to mercury, such as thimerosal in flu shots, may be a genetic risk factor for autism. (Critics
call the study strange with logical hurdles.)

A Journal of Immunotoxicology review in 2011 by a former pharmaceutical company senior

scientist concluded autism could result from more than one cause including encephalitis
(brain damage) following vaccination. (Critics say she reviewed debunked and fringe
science.)

In 2011, City University of New York correlated autism prevalence with increased childhood
vaccine uptake. Although mercury has been removed from many vaccines, other culprits
may link vaccines to autism, said the studys lead author. (To critics, its junk science.)

A University of British Columbia study in 2011 that found the correlation between
Aluminum [an adjuvant] in vaccines and [autism] may be causal. (More junk science, say
the propagandists.)

A 2011 rat study out of Warsaw, Poland found thimerosal in vaccines given at a young age
could contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders. (Proves nothing, say critics.)

A Chinese study in 2012 suggested that febrile seizures (an acknowledged side effect of some
vaccines) and family history of neuropsychiatric disorders correlate with autistic regression.

A 2012 study from the Neurochemistry Research Marie Curie Chairs Program in Poland
found that newborn exposure to vaccines with thimerosal (such as flu shots) might cause
glutamate-related brain injuries.

In 2013, neurosurgeons at the Methodist Neurological Institute found that children with mild
mitochondrial defect may be highly susceptible to toxins like the vaccine preservative
thimerosal found in vaccines such as flu shots. (Too small of a study, say the critics.)

In 2016, Frontiers published a survey of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children. The

vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD (neurodevelopmental disorders, including
autism) than the unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly
associated with NDD after controlling for other factors. However, preterm birth combined
with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD.

Then, theres a 2004 Columbia University study presented at the Institute of Medicine. It
found that mice predisposed for genetic autoimmune disorder developed autistic-like
behavior after receiving mercury-containing vaccines. (Critics say thats not proof, and the
work was not replicable.)

Theres Dr. William Thompson, the current CDC senior scientist who has come forward with
an extraordinary statement to say that he and his agency have engaged in long term efforts to
obscure a studys significant link between vaccines and autism, heightened in African
Americans boys. (The CDC says the data changes made were for legitimate reasons.)
Theres the current CDC immunization safety director who acknowledged to me that its
possible vaccines may rarely trigger autism in children who are biologically or genetically
susceptible to vaccine injury.

Theres the case of Hannah Poling, in which the government secretly admitted multiple
vaccines given in one day triggered her brain injuries, including autism, then paid a multi-
million dollar settlement, and had the case sealed from the prying public eyes under a
confidentiality order.

There was the former head of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Bernadine Healy, who
stoked her peers ire by publicly stating that the vaccine-autism link was not a myth as so
many tried to claim. She disclosed that her colleagues at the Institute of Medicine did not
wish to investigate the possible link because they feared the impact it would have on the
vaccination program.

Theres former CDC researcher Poul Thorsen, whose studies dispelled a vaccine autism link.
Hes now a most wanted fugitive after being charged with 13 counts of wire fraud and nine
counts of money laundering for allegedly using CDC grants of tax dollars to buy a house and
cars for himself.

And there are the former scientists from Merck, maker of the MMR vaccine in question, who
have turned into whistleblowers and accuse their company of committing vaccine fraud.

Read: CDC Vaccine Information Statements

The Spin

If you want to review research and evidence on the other side, a simple Internet search will
easily turn up everything you want to know. Those studies always seem to get covered in the
news. They somehow turn up first in Google search results, along with the reports and blogs
disparaging all opposing science and news reporting.

You might run across a February article in the New York Times. It treated the vaccine autism
theory as if it comes down to a disagreement between emotionally fragile parents of autistic
children and real research: faith and feeling versus hard science.

Some parents feel certain that vaccines can lead to autism, stated the article, and the
vaccine-autism link has continued to be accepted on faith by some.

You might run across this network news story that uses Dr. Paul Offit as an expert on vaccine
safety. Hes introduced as director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Childrens
Hospital of Philadelphia and he denies a connection with vaccination and autism.

Somehow, it goes unreported that Offit has made millions (he wont disclose exactly how
much) inventing a vaccine for Merck, which makes the MMR vaccine in question. Offits
rotavirus vaccine has, itself, been the subject of safety concerns. And his employment at
Childrens Hospital has been funded in part by $1.5 million given by Merck. In addition, he
got caught giving false and disparaging information regarding a report I did exposing his
financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry he so vigorously defends. His false statements
were corrected by the publication that originally reported them. And Offit and his book
publisher settled a libel accusation by a vaccine safety advocate who accused Offit of
fabricating a disparaging conversation in his book: Autisms False Prophets. Offit agreed to
apologize, correct the book and make a donation to an autism charity.

But to the news: none of that matters. Offit is simply presented as an unbiased expert.

The supposedly best medical experts in the world who deny vaccines have anything to do
with autism remain at an utter loss to explain this generations epidemic. To declare the
science settled and the debate over is to defy the plain fact that many scientists
worldwide are still sorting through it, and millions of people are still debating it.

The body of evidence on both sides is open to interpretation. People have every right to
disbelieve the studies on one side. But it is disingenuous to pretend they do not exist.
The Full Story about Zostavax, the Shingles
Vaccine
TOPICS:MSGshinglesside effectsvitamin c

Posted By: Sherri Tenpenny, DO March 14, 2017

ADVERTISEMENT

Humans are the only known host for the herpes varicella-zoster virus (VZV) that causes
chickenpox. A very benign infection in the vast majority of children, chickenpox used to be
called a right of passage disease, with most kids contracting the infection between the ages
of 8 and 12. Recovery left behind lifetime immunity and in little girls, antibodies to be passed
to their infants through breast milk later on life.

Vaccinated persons can still contract chickenpox. The so-called breakthrough infection
occurs in approximately 2 percent of vaccinations per year. That may sound like a small
number until you do the math. With nearly 4 million live births per year in the US, 2 percent
equates to at least 80,000 cases of breakthrough chickenpox. And doctors say the infection
will less serious if the child has been vaccinated, severe cases have been reported.

A study released in March 2017 examined the incidence of severe breakthrough chickenpox
infection. They performed a systematic review of articles published between 1974 and 2016.
The abstract reports their disturbing findings:

We found 52 to 60 unique cases of breakthrough varicella that involved organs

other than the skin. We also found the following complications, with each
disorder not unique or mutually exclusive: pneumonia (n = 89 cases), neurologic
(n = 1824 cases), hematologic (n = 1011 cases), ocular (n = 5 cases), renal (n = 2 cases),
hepatic (n = 3 cases), secondary infection with bacteremia or sepsis (n = 8 cases), and
other complications (n = 4 cases). There were 6 cases of fatal breakthrough
varicella.
 And it gets worse.

Without re-exposure, the dormant chickenpox virus can reactivate in adults, leading to the
painful rash referred to as herpes zoster (HZ) or shingles. The zoster rash is typically
unilateral, does not cross the midline and follows a distribution along a dermatome, an area of
the skin supplied by nerves from a single spinal root. The painful rash usually lasts 7-10
days but can last 3 to 4 weeks, or more.

HZ causes acute and chronic complications, with complications occurring in 15%40% of

cases. The most common complication is post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), persistent, often
permanent pain that remains long after the HZ rash has disappeared. Another severe
complication HZ is herpes ophthalmicus (HO), when the virus inflames nerves near or in the
eye. If not aggressively treated with antivirals and steroids, HO can result in loss of vision in
the affected eye.

Historically, shingles was typically diagnosed in those who were elderly,

immunocompromised, had insulin dependent diabetes or were taking drugs such as steroids,
chemotherapy or biologics. After the widespread use of the chickenpox vaccine over the last
12 years, very little wild varicella virus remains in circulation. Adults who had chickenpox as
kids maintain their long-term immunity by being re-exposed children and grandchildren who
have this 7-day itchy infection. Without the re-exposure, adult immunity is waning and the
horrors of what Dr. Gary Goldman tried to expose in his book, The Chickenpox Vaccine: A
New Epidemic of Disease and Corruption has become a reality. Goldman predicted that more
than 50 million adults in the U.S. alone will experience shingles in their lifetime. But
instead of stopping mass vaccination with the chickenpox vaccine, the FDA approved a new
vaccine for adults in 2006 called Zostavax, a vaccine developed to prevent shingles. We are
now creating vaccines to address a problem caused by a vaccine.

What is Zostavax?

The Zostavax vaccine contains weakened chickenpox virus and can shed to others. Some
patients inoculated with Zostavax were found to shed the vaccine-strain virus through
their saliva for one month after vaccination. There are documented cases of indirect infection
from contact with recently vaccinated individuals. If someone has received a shingles
vaccine, they should be advised to avoid contact with newborns, pregnant women and those
who are immunosuppressed for up to a month. We are now creating vaccines to address a
problem caused by a vaccine.

Does Zostavax prevent shingles?

In fact, the truth about the shingles shot may be even worse than a lack of protection. More
than 31,000 adverse effects from Zostavax have been reported to VAERS take some time to
read a few of these horrific reactions.

Seniors are specific targets for the shingles vaccine. Those on Medicare expect that Medicare
Part D will pay for the cost of the vaccine but that may not be the case. If the deductible has
not been met, the full cost of the vaccine and administration ranging from $190 to over
$350 may have to be paid by the patient.
A review article on herpes zoster, published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM)
generated a comment by Roy Fried, MD. MHS regarding the number of serious adverse
events (AE) after the shingles vaccine:

For persons over 60, there is a 36% increase incidence of serious AEs within the
first 42 days when data from FDA safety study was combined data from the Shingles
Prevention Study.

For persons over 80, the ability of the vaccine to prevent shingles or PHN was no
better than placebo AND these seniors had nearly double the rate of serious AEs in
the first 42 days after the vaccination.

Will Zostavax decrease pain?

The vaccine industry frequently touts that even if the vaccine doesnt keep you from getting
sick, you will have a less severe case of the infection. Not true with Zostavax. The FDA
reported those who were vaccinated and still developed shingles, the severity of the pain was
the same as the pain experienced in those who contracted shingles but had not been
vaccinated. And the vaccinated group reported the pain was only two days less that the pain
experienced by the unvaccinated group (20 days vs. 22 days).

Dr. Tenpenny's Book is currently available on Amazon

There has been a recent trend by physicians to give the shingles vaccine to adults who have
already had shingles to prevent a reoccurrence. One study of more than 6,000 people 60 years
or older were followed for an average of 2 years. After recovering from shingles, about 20%
were given the shingles vaccine. Researchers concluded that getting shingles a second time
was uncommon, whether or not a vaccine was given.

So why bother getting a second, expensive shot, and risk the long list of potential side
effects.

Does Zostavax save the healthcare system money?

The zoster shot has not lessened the incidence of disease; in fact, by eliminating the
circulating chickenpox virus, we have significantly added to the overall cost of healthcare.
Prior to 1993, and during the first 5 years of using the chickenpox vaccine, the rate of
hospitalizations due to shingles did not change. Beginning in 2001, hospitalizations began to
increase, and by 2004 the overall rate of hospitalization was 2.5 cases of shingles per 10,000
U.S. population, significantly higher than any year prior to 2002. Hospital fees increased
by more than $700 million annually by 2004; in particular, persons aged 60 years or older
accounted for 74% of the total annual hospital charges in 2004.

Can Zostavax Be Given Simultaneously Other Vaccines?

The package insert warns that the vaccine should not be given at the same time as the adult
pneumonia shot BUT it is safe to be given at the same time as a flu shot.

Seniors beware!
If you are given both injections at the same time at your doctors appointment, this is what
will be injected into your body.

Shingles shot contains:

Viral Particles: At least 19,400 PFU (plaque forming units) 14 times more viral
particles than in the chickenpox vaccine

Animal cells:

o Pig: porcine gelatin 15.58mg known to cause anaphylaxis and food

allergies

o Cow: bovine serum known to cause anaphylaxis and food allergies

o Aborted Human cells: MRC-5 cells

o Antibiotic: Neomycin

o Chemical: sodium chloride (table salt) 4.0 mg

o Chemical: MSG, 0.62mg

o Chemical: sodium phosphate dibasic, 0.57mg

o Chemical: potassium phosphate monobasic, 0.10mg

o Chemical: potassium chloride, 0.10 mg

o Chemical: sucrose, 31.16 mg

Flu shot ex: Regular Fluzone (Fluzone HighDose is given to some seniors; it does not
have mercury)

o Viral particles: 45 mcg

o Animal cells:

o Residual egg protein

o Pig: porcine gelatin 5 mg

o Chemical: sodium phosphate

o Chemical: Formaldehyde, 75 mcg

o Chemical: Octylphenol ethooxylate, (Triton X-100), 75 mcg

 o Chemical: Thimerosal mercury 12.5mcg to 25 mcg per dose

Are you willing to put this into your system for less than a 50:50 chance of avoiding the
shingles?

What To Do Instead

Vitamin C is a first line antioxidant to protect against viral illnesses. The higher the blood
levels of vitamin C, the more shingles can be avoided. It is well known that much higher
doses of vitamin C can be taken and absorbed when a person is ill than can be tolerated when
health. By taking oral vitamin C ascorbates daily as much as can be tolerated is one of the
best ways to keep the herpes zoster virus in check. This is the brand I recommend and we sell
in our office in Cleveland, Ohio. Since this product is a powder, it can be dosed easily for all
persons in the family.

Integrative physicians have long known that large doses of vitamin C are highly effective
treating shingles. An oral protocol recommended by The Vitamin C Foundation suggests
starting with 3000 mg powdered vitamin C ascorbates. Repeat the dose every 30 to 60
minutes until you experience a single episode of loose stool (not quite diarrhea). At that point,
reduce the dosage to 2000 mg every hour until the symptoms are relieved and have no
diarrhea. If you have access to an IV protocol, the pain of shingles and PHN can definitely be
modulated and perhaps quickly eliminated with intravenous vitamin C.

A case report of two patients (females aged 67 and 53 years) who were
diagnosed with shingles and PHN received 15 g of vitamin C was administered
intravenously every second day over a period of two weeks. Sudden and total
remission of the neuropathic was observed with complete remission of the skin
lesions within 10 days.

The shingles vaccine is one of many vaccines the mainstream establishment will be pushing
on seniors over the next few years to reach the goals set by HealthyPeople 2020. Knowing
the risks of side effects and the lack of benefit should help you to stay strong in your decision
to Just. Say. NO.

< < < < < < TOP 20 Most Frequently Asked Questions > > > > > >
Several of these answers may only be viewed here:
facebook.com/groups/ParentalRights

How do I find a vaccine-choice and/or holistic physician?

facebook.com/grou/ParentalRights/permalink/1382091785196586
2) I know vaccinations are dangerous, but what about the vitamin K shot ~ thats just a
vitamin, right?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-is-back-to-rhode-island/just-say-no-to-the-vitamin-k-
shot/147069749033953
3) I feel bullied by my childs doctor. How do I handle this?
You are entitled to INFORMED CONSENT!
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-revolution-for-choice/will-your-childs-doctor-answer-these-16-
questions/168802293527365
4) I have been receiving letters and calls from my state to get my kids up to date ~ Can I be
removed from their lists?
facebook.com/g/1083727945032973/permalink/1132789506793483/
5) I need titer testing done ~ Where can I go?
accesalabs.com/titer-test or requestatest.com/titer-testing#individual
6) Where can I find the actual vaccine inserts and the ingredients in each vaccine?
tinyurl.com/ReadVaccineInserts
AND:
tinyurl.com/AllVaccineIngredients
7) What possible allergens are in vaccines?
tinyurl.com/AllergensInVaccines
8) How do I report a doctor who refuses to document my child's vaccine injury or did not
provide me with accurate information on the dangers of vaccination?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-revolution-for-choice/file-complaints-against-all-doctors-who-
injure-children-with-vaccines/169813260092935
9) What are some of the documentaries I should see? facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-
revolution-for-choice/12-must-see-films-to-watch-online-before-making-an-informed-choice-
about-vaccina/188022001605394
10) Are there any health professionals with an opposing view towards vaccination?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-revolution-for-choice/just-a-sampling-of-health-experts-
whove-spoken-the-truth-about-vaccines/188468418227419
and here: facebook.com/grou/ParentalRights/permalink/1362384810500617
11) How can I help heal my child or myself from vaccine-injury?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-revolution-for-choice/by-kim-schuette/173285233079071
12) Does my child really need a Pediatrician?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-revolution-for-choice/learn-all-you-can-protect-your-
children/167518636989064
13) Are there peer-reviewed studies demonstrating the toxicity and potential harm that may
be caused by vaccine ingredients?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-revolution-for-choice/30-solid-scientific-studies-that-prove-
vaccines-cause-the-brain-damage-that-is-l/165199450554316
14) What are the all the possible effects of various vaccine ingredients on my child or
myself?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-revolution-for-choice/the-toxic-ingredients-in-
vaccines/160099041064357
15) What books do you recommend? facebook.com//revolu/book-
recommendations/1360395847366180
16) How do I report a vaccine injury?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-a-revolution-for-choice/how-to-report-vaccine-injuries-to-
vaers/211814739226120
17) Is it true that the CDC actually holds vaccine patents?
facebook.com/grou/ParentalRights/permalink/1367013253371106
18) What do I do when I am required to sign an exemption form that claims I am endangering
my child by not vaccinating?
facebook.com/notes/vaxxed-is-back-to-rhode-island/what-to-do-when-you-are-pressured-to-
sign-exemption-forms-with-objectionable-sta/147359595671635
19) How do I obtain MEDICAL VACCINE EXEMPTION for my child?
facebook.com/grou/ParentalRights/permalink/1415290678543363
20) Where can I find a sample of a Religious exemptionfacebook.com//courtesy-oSOTN:
Alternative News & Commentary
Revealing the True State of the Nation

Heres a CDC document bombshell that

changes everything
Posted on March 11, 2017 by State of the Nation
FacebookTwitter
Share

CDC document bombshell reveals list of all

vaccine excipients, including African
Green Monkey Kidney Cells and
fibroblast cells from aborted human fetuses
see the complete list
by: Mike Adams
NaturalNews.com
(Natural News) Almost no one has any real idea whats found in vaccines. When they allow
themselves to be injected with vaccines, theyre oblivious to the fact that they are being
injected with aborted human fetus cell lines or African Green Monkey kidney pus cells
harvested from infected, disease primates. (See proof from the CDC, below.)

Yet, astonishingly, the CDC openly admits to all this (and more). In a PDF posted on the
CDC website entitled Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary, the CDC lists all the
excipients currently used in vaccines being injected into adults and children across the United
States. The CDCs list, current as of January 6, 2017, was extracted from manufacturers
package inserts, according to the CDC.

The complete list is found in this CDC document (PDF). In case the CDC removes it
because theyve been known to suddenly memory hole documents they dont want the
public to see weve also posted a copy at the Natural News servers (PDF).

The WI-38 cell line is widely known to be derived from lung tissue of an aborted white
(caucasian) female fetus, as even the pro-vaccine Wikipedia website admits. As the Coriell
Institute for Medical Research explains about the MRC-5 cell line / WI-38:

The MRC-5 cell line was developed in September 1966 from lung tissue taken from a 14 week
fetus aborted for psychiatric reason from a 27 year old physically healthy woman. The cell
morphology is fibroblast-like. The karyotype is 46,XY; normal diploid male. Cumulative
population doublings to senescence is 42-48. G6PD isoenzyme is type B.

The human fetal tissue cells have become such an issue of outrage that even the Vatican has
issued a statement concerning their use, in which they address, vaccines containing live
viruses which have been prepared from human cell lines of fetal origin, using tissues from
aborted human fetuses as a source of such cells. You can find the Vaticans response at this
link, in which they discuss the moral and ethical issues of The principle of licit cooperation
in evil.

Below, youll find the complete list published by the CDC, de-duplicated and sorted
alphabetically. Notice that these ingredients include toxic metals (aluminum salts), bizarre
animal cells from humans, monkeys, cows, pigs and chickens, ingredients derived from
GMOs, the radioactive element barium, artificial coloring chemicals, excitotoxins such as
glutamate, chemical cleansing agents (Triton X-100), dangerous bacterial strains (E.coli),
toxic chemicals such as glutaraldehyde, thimerosal (mercury) and much more.

No one can refute any of this because its admitted by the CDC itself. Heres some of the
PROOF:

PROOF that the CDC has approved African Green

Monkey kidney cells for use in vaccines
First, a CDC document titled Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary lists all the vaccine
excipient ingredients found in CDC-approved vaccines. The URL for this document is:

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf

As you can see from the screen shots of the document, below, the list of excipient ingredients
is current as of January 6, 2017, according to the CDC.

Youll also see that this document includes a row for a Smallpox vaccine known as Vaccinia
ACAM2000. The list of excipients in this vaccine are:

African Green Monkey kidney (Vero) cells, HEPES, human serum albumin, sodium chloride,
neomycin, polymyxin B, Glycerin, phenol
Note the inclusion of African Green Monkey kidney cells in the list. And note carefully that
the entire mainstream media is calling Natural News a liar for accurately citing this CDC
document.

In addition, this same document also includes an ingredients list for another vaccine called
Adenovirus, which contains the following ingredients, one of which is derived from aborted
human fetal cells:

human-diploid fibroblast cell cultures (strain WI-38), Dulbeccos Modified Eagles Medium,
fetal bovine serum, sodium bicarbonate, monosodium glutamate, sucrose, D-mannose, D-
fructose, dextrose, human serum albumin, potassium phosphate, plasdone C, anhydrous
lactose, microcrystalline cellulose, polacrilin potassium, magnesium stearate,
microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate, cellulose acetate phthalate, alcohol, acetone,
castor oil, FD&C Yellow #6 aluminum lake dye

As you can see form this list, these CDC-approved vaccines are deliberately formulated with
all sorts of highly toxic and questionable ingredients, including acetone, a toxic solvent,
aluminum, artificial coloring chemicals, human blood components, dextrose (probably from
GMO corn), cow blood components and a whole lot more.

FDA confirms these vaccines are licensed and approved

for use in the United States
Are these vaccines made with African Green Monkey kidney cells and aborted human fetal
cells really used in the United States?

YES.
This page from the FDA lists all the vaccines which are licensed for use in the United
States, and it includes the vaccines containing African Green Monkey kidney cells and the
WI-38 aborted human fetal cells.

LIVE Smallpox viruses grown in monkey kidneys, then

harvested to be injected into YOU!
In addition to the CDC confirming Natural News is 100% correct through the documents
listed above, the vaccine insert sheet itself also describes the use of African Green
Monkey kidney cells.

From the insert sheet for the ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine, approved by the FDA in 2007
and still on the approved list:

https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM1
42572.pdf

Click the following link for a backup copy on Natural News servers.

http://www.naturalnews.com/files/UCM142572.pdf

ACAM2000, Smallpox (Vaccinia) Vaccine, Live, is a live vaccinia virus derived from plaque
purification cloning from Dryvax (Wyeth Laboratories, Marietta, PA, calf lymph vaccine,
New York City Board of Health Strain) and grown in African Green Monkey kidney (Vero)
cells and tested to be free of adventitious agents. ACAM2000 is provided as a lyophilized
preparation of purified live virus containing the following non-active excipients: 6-8 mM
HEPES (pH 6.5-7.5), 2% human serum albumin USP, 0.5 0.7% sodium chloride USP, 5%
mannitol USP, and trace amounts of neomycin and polymyxin B.
Vaccine WARNINGS related to the vaccine using African
Green Monkey kidney cells
Not surprisingly, this vaccine is known to cause extremely serious and even deadly side
effects at a shockingly high rate. Heres the WARNING box from the vaccine insert sheet,
linked above:

WARNING:

See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning

Myocarditis and pericarditis (suspect cases observed at a rate of 5.7 per 1000 primary
vaccinees (95% CI: 1.9-13.3)), encephalitis, encephalomyelitis, encephalopathy, progressive
vaccinia, generalized vaccinia, severe vaccinial skin infections, erythema multiforme major
(including STEVENS-JOHNSON SYNDROME), eczema vaccinatum resulting in permanent
sequelae or death, ocular complications, blindness and fetal death, have occurred following
either primary vaccination or revaccination with live vaccinia virus smallpox vaccines. These
risks are increased in certain individuals and may result in severe disability, permanent
neurological sequelae and/or death [see Warnings and Precautions (5)].

Heres a screen shot of the warnings section of the vaccine insert:

Note the mention of death several times, and the shockingly high rate of serious adverse
events at 5.7 per 1000 vaccinees. Notice also that this vaccine can cause permanent
blindness, spontaneous abortions and severe neurological damage.
Note also that the entire vaccine pushing mainstream media will deny ever word of this
even thought its printed right on the vaccine insert sheet. This shows you the extreme
dishonesty and medical malpractice of all those who push vaccines while falsely claiming
them to be safe.

Watch for more analysis of the toxicity of these ingredients will be published at
Vaccines.news and Natural News.

Heres what happens to some children when theyre injected with these toxins:

The complete list of vaccine excipients published by the

CDC, current as of January 6, 2017
betapropiolactone

CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide)

formalin

L-cystine

2-phenoxyethanol
a continuous line of monkey kidney cells

acetone

African Green Monkey kidney (Vero) cells

alcohol

aluminum hydroxide

aluminum phosphate

aluminum salts

amino acid supplement

amino acids

amino acids solution

aminoglycoside antibiotic

ammonium sulfate

ammonium sulfate aluminum phosphate

amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate

amphotericin B

anhydrous lactose

anti-foaming agent

arginine

ascorbic acid

asparagine

baculovirus and cellular DNA

baculovirus and Spodoptera frugiperda cell proteins

barium

benzethonium chloride

beta- propriolactone
beta-propiolactone

bovine albumin

bovine calf serum

bovine serum

bovine serum albumin

calcium carbonate

calcium chloride

calf bovine serum

Calf serum

calf serum and lactalbumin hydrolysate

carbohydrates

casamino acids

casamino acids and yeast extract-based medium

casein

castor oil

cell culture media

cellulose acetate phthalate

cetyltrimethlyammonium bromide

chick embryo cell culture

chicken fibroblasts

chlortetracycline

citric acid

citric acid monohydrate

CMRL 1969 medium supplemented with calf serum

complex fermentation media

concentrated vitamin solution

CRM197 carrier protein

CY medium

cystine

D- fructose

D- glucose

defined fermentation growth media

deoxycholate

dextran

dextrose

dibasic potassium phosphate

dibasic sodium phosphate

dimethyl-beta-cyclodextrin

dimethyl-beta-cyclodextrin. glutaraldehyde

disodium phosphate

disodium phosphate dihydrate

D-mannose

DNA

dried lactose

Dulbeccos Modified Eagle Medium

Dulbeccos Modified Eagles Medium

E. coli

Eagle MEM modified medium

EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid)

egg protein
egg proteins

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)

FD&C Yellow #6 aluminum lake dye

Fenton medium containing a bovine extract

ferric (III) nitrate

fetal bovine serum

formaldehyde

Franz complete medium

galactose

gelatin

gentamicin sulfate

glutamate

glutaraldehyde

Glycerin

guinea pig cell cultures

HEPES

hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide

histidine

histidine buffered saline.

host cell DNA

host cell protein

human albumin

human diploid cell cultures (MRC-5)

human diploid cell cultures (WI-38)

human embryonic lung cell cultures

human serum albumin

human-diploid fibroblast cell cultures (strain WI-38)

hydrocortisone

hydrolyzed casein

hydrolyzed gelatin

hydrolyzed porcine gelatin

inorganic salts

iron ammonium citrate

isotonic sodium chloride

kanamycin

L-250 glutamine

lactalbumin hydrolysate

lactose

L-histidine

lipids

L-tyrosine

M-199 without calf bovine serum

Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cell protein

magnesium stearate

magnesium stearate. gelatin

magnesium sulfate

maltose

MDCK cell DNA

Medium 199 without calf serum

microcrystalline cellulose
mineral salts

modified culture medium containing hydrolyzed casein

modified Latham medium derived from bovine casein

modified Mueller and Miller medium

modified Mueller and Miller medium (the culture medium contains milk- derived raw
materials [casein derivatives])

modified Muellers growth medium

modified Mueller-Miller casamino acid medium without beef heart infusion

modified Muellers media which contains bovine extracts

modified Stainer-Scholte liquid medium

monobasic potassium phosphate

monobasic sodium phosphate

monosodium glutamate

monosodium L-glutamate

monosodium phosphate

MRC-5 cells

MRC-5 cells (a line of normal human diploid cells)

MRC-5 diploid fibroblasts

MRC-5 human diploid cells

Mueller Hinton casein agar

Muellers growth medium

neomycin

neomycin sulfate

non-viral protein

nonylphenol ethoxylate

normal human diploid cells

octoxynol-10 (TRITON X-100)

octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton X-100)

ovalbumin

ovalbumin neomycin

phenol

phenol red

phenol red indicator

phosphate buffer

phosphate-buffered saline solution

plasdone C

polacrilin potassium

polydimethylsiloxane

polygeline (processed bovine gelatin)

polymyxin

polymyxin B

polymyxin B sulfate

polysorbate 20

polysorbate 20 (Tween 20)

polysorbate 80

polysorbate 80 (Tween 80)

potassium aluminum sulfate

potassium chloride

potassium glutamate

potassium phosphate

potassium phosphate dibasic

potassium phosphate monobasic

potassium phosphate potassium chloride

protamine sulfate

protein other than HA

recombinant human albumin

saline

semi-synthetic media

semi-synthetic medium

sodium bicarbonate

sodium borate

sodium carbonate

sodium chloride

sodium citrate

sodium citrate dehydrate

sodium deoxycholate

sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate

sodium EDTA

sodium hydrogenocarbonate

sodium hydroxide

sodium metabisulphite

sodium phosphate

sodium phosphate dibasic

sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate

sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride

sodium phosphate-buffered isotonic sodium chloride solution

sodium pyruvate

sodium taurodeoxycholate

sorbitan trioleate

sorbitol

soy peptone

soy peptone broth

squalene

Stainer-Scholte medium

sterile water

succinate buffer

sucrose

sugars

synthetic medium

thimerosal

thimerosal (multi- dose vials)

thimerosal (multi-dose vials)

tris (trometamol)-HCl

Triton X-100

uracil

urea

VERO cells

vero cells (a continuous line of monkey kidney cells)

vero cells [DNA from porcine circoviruses (PCV) 1 and 2 has been detected in RotaTeq.
PCV-1 and PCV-2 are not known to cause disease in humans.]

vitamins

Watson Scherp casamino acid media

Watson Scherp media containing casamino acid

WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts

WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts MRC-5 cells

xanthan [Porcine circovirus type 1 (PCV-1) is present in Rotarix. PCV-1 is not known to
cause disease in humans.]

yeast extract

yeast protein

-tocopheryl hydrogen succinate

-propiolactone

___
http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-06-cdc-document-bombshell-reveals-list-of-all-
vaccine-excipients-including-african-green-monkey-kidney-cells-and-fibroblast-cells-from-
aborted-human-fetuses-see-the-complete-list.html

1) f-miranda-margare/1396917307047367
98 million Americans were given polio
vaccine contaminated with cancer-causing
virus, admits CDC
Thursday, July 25, 2013 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: CDC, polio vaccine, SV40

Most Viewed Articles

Today
Week
Month
Year

Dave Chappelle intelligently questions mandatory vaccines in new Netflix special -

NaturalNews.com

Vitamin C breakthrough discovery: Low-cost nutrient halts growth of cancer stem

cells 1000% more effective than cancer drug peer-reviewed science confirms
powerful effects - NaturalNews.com

WARNING: Sugar destroys your bodys ability to absorb these 5 essential nutrients -
NaturalNews.com

Life after death is real, concludes scientific study of 2,000 patients

Smart Meters causing tidal wave of mysterious illnesses that strike people in their
own homes

Google profits from Jihadi training videos that teach mass murder while Facebook
gives thumbs up to kill white women posts - NaturalNews.com

Chemotherapy kills far more Americans than all acts of war, suicide and terrorism
combined

All Apple devices, including iPhones and Macs, are CIA spy devices embedded with
spyware from the factory - NaturalNews.com

Wisconsins war on butter is an attack on fundamental personal freedom -

NaturalNews.com
 Thousands of people now have non-Hodgkins Lymphoma due to glyphosate
(Roundup) exposure, warns legal firm thats suing Monsanto - NaturalNews.com

Statin scam exposed: Cholesterol drugs cause rapid aging, brain damage and diabetes

Allergy alert: How to naturally treat the spring sniffles - NaturalNews.com

Cheerios Save the bees campaign backfires after company gives out seeds that are
invasive, banned in some states - NaturalNews.com

The BIG LIE upon which all government is founded - NaturalNews.com

Coincidence? Monsanto patented glyphosate as an antibiotic drug, claiming weed

killer is medicine - NaturalNews.com

TED Talks parody video exposes the total bulls##t of TED-fabricated thought
leaders who spew pseudoknowledge pretending to be big ideas - NaturalNews.com

40 shockingly simple skills that today's Millennials have no idea how to do

Nanoweapons may wipe out humanity before the end of the century, warns futurist -
NaturalNews.com

Popular on Facebook
52K
Hexavalent chromium (chromium-6) was just found in 75% of drinking water... the mass
chemical suicide of America is under way
40K
All-out effort to destroy Trump PROVES he's not part of the establishment... NOT an
insider... 'Trump' movement has grown way beyond one man's actions or words
36K
Electoral victory for Hillary already LOCKED IN via massive bribery... George Soros admits
on video... democracy be damned... THEFT of the presidency already complete
35K
56 examples of outrageously foul, lewd language spewed by Bill and Hillary Clinton over the
last three decades
27K
The defeat of Hillary Clinton just dealt a devastating blow to Monsanto, Big Pharma and the
corrupt vaccine industry
23K
VOTERS WARNED: You've already lost America... this election is about taking it back in the
last non-violent way possible: At the voting booth
17K
TRUMP MIRACLE... DEPLORABLES TAKE BACK AMERICA... LEFTISTS TOTAL
FREAK OUT
17K
After terrorizing America with Zika scaremongering, Washington Post now admits Zika virus
doesn't cause brain deformities after all
17K
Natural News announces economic boycott of CNN corporate sponsors, including GEICO,
WellsFargo, Sprint, Dodge and ETrade
16K
The defeated left turns to HATE: Liberals unleash beatings, death threats and calls for mass
murder of Trump supporters
14K
The FBI is going to bring down the DOJ... and America will cheer the agency's heroes as the
Clinton crime regime is finally toppled
13K
If Hillary Clinton seizes the White House, it will be an illegitimate, null and void THEFT of
power... democracy OBLITERATED... America a FAILED state
13K
CLAIM: Historic event to occur in the next six days that will end the rise of Trump and seize
the future of America for totalitarian globalists
11K
MUTINY AT THE FBI: Comey warned by his own agents to indict Clinton or watch the
FBI's reputation go down in flames
10K
SO OBVIOUS: Obama regime planning massive false flag terror attacks on Monday to halt a
Trump victory and save democrats from being indicted
9K
Donald Trump lays out historic plan for first 100 days in office: End corruption, stop the
crooks in Washington and unleash economic abundance for America
9K
BREAKING: Racketeering indictment of Hillary Clinton now 'likely' as FOIA for Datto
backup device reveals FBI possesses ALL the incriminating emails
9K
How many illegitimate children has Bill Clinton fathered? How many sexual assault victims
has Hillary Clinton threatened into silence?
(NaturalNews) The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has once again
been caught removing pertinent but indicting information about vaccines from its website.
This time it involves the infamous polio vaccine, up to 98 million doses of which have been
exposed as containing a cancer-causing virus that is now believed to be responsible for
causing millions of cancers in America, according to the CDC.

The information was posted on an official CDC fact sheet entitled Cancer, Simian Virus 40
(SV40), and Polio Vaccine, which has since been removed from the CDC's website.
Fortunately, RealFarmacy.com was able to archive the damning page before the CDC
ultimately removed it, presumably because SV40 has been receiving considerable attention
lately due to its connection to causing cancer.

You can view the link to the original CDC page on SV40 and polio vaccines, which is no
longer active, here:
http://www.cdc.gov

You can view the full archived CDC page here:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com

As you will notice on the archived CDC page, the SV40 virus was allegedly first discovered
in monkeys back in 1960, and not long after began appearing inexplicably in polio vaccines.
The SV40 virus, according to this same page, has been linked to causing a variety of human
cancers, including childhood leukemia, lung cancer, bone cancer, and Non-Hodgkin
Lymphoma.

Though the CDC denies a definitive causal link between SV40 and cancer, it implies that the
virus, which was supposedly removed from all polio vaccines in 1963, was problematic in
relation to cancer development. More than 98 million people, in fact, may have been exposed
to SV40 as a result of receiving government-recommended polio vaccines back in the 1960s,
and many of these may have developed cancer as a result.

"More than 98 million Americans received one or more doses of polio vaccine from 1955 to
1963 when a proportion of vaccine was contaminated with SV40," explains the CDC. "[I]t
has been estimated that 10-30 million Americans could have received an SV40 contaminated
dose of vaccine."
SV40 virus in polio vaccines linked to bone
cancer, mesothelioma
So why the sudden removal of this important information from the CDC's website? The
cached CDC page, as you will notice, makes sure to dissuade its readers from thinking that
SV40 has been conclusively linked to causing cancer, even though it was demonstrated back
in 1961 by the National Institute of Health (NIH) that SV40 is directly linked to causing
tumor formation.

"Like other polyomaviruses, SV40 is a DNA virus that has been found to cause tumors and
cancer," explains RealFarmacy.com. "SV40 is believed to suppress the transcriptional
properties of the tumor-suppressing genes in humans through the SV40 Large T-antigen and
SV40 Small T-antigen. Mutated genes may contribute to uncontrolled cellular proliferation,
leading to cancer."

As far as specific conditions linked to SV40, Michele Carbone, Assistant Professor of

Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago, found that the virus is present in many cases of
both osteosarcoma bone cancer and the increasingly prevalent lung cancer variety known as
mesothelioma. As it turns out, Carbone identified SV40 in about one-third of all
osteosarcoma cases studied, and in 40 percent of other bone cancers. The same was true for
60 percent of all cases of mesothelioma.

"Many authorities now admit much, possibly most, of the world's cancers came from the Salk
and Sabin polio vaccines, and hepatitis B vaccines, produced in monkeys and chimps," adds
RealFarmacy.com. "It is said (that) mesothelioma is a result of asbestos exposure, but
research reveals that 50 percent of the current mesotheliomas being treated no longer occur
due to asbestos but rather the SV40 virus contained in polio vaccination."

Be sure to read the entire RealFarmacy.com report here:

http://www.realfarmacy.com

Sources for this article include:

http://www.realfarmacy.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.sv40foundation.org

http://www.science.naturalnews.com