Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
This article appeared in the New Zealand Journal of Teachers Work, Volume
12, Issue 2, 2015. Lewis is the head of the teacher preparation program at
the Auckland University of Technology and has been using eportfolios with
her students since 2007, developing research and pedagogy centered around
eportfolios throughout that time. I selected this article primarily because the
author used Mahara, the same eportfolio site that I currently use with my
While there were not specific examples given, Lewis shared her growth over
time in how she viewed the use of the eportfolio with her education students
Lewis examines three very different learning activities, each through four
critical lenses. She sees the eportfolio as both product and process and
believes that they are not mutually exclusive. This is because the learner is
in control of the form and content of the portfolio and the act of selecting
and organizing the artifacts requires the learner to reflect, discuss, share,
final product. She employs Brookfields four lenses to assess each of the
three assignments:
1 - Autobiographical experiences of learning the teacher imposing their
thinking.
The three portfolio activities that Lewis assessed through these four lenses
were:
teacher directed and had a specific structure. While there was room for
over time through a series of writings that are used to conclude what
artifacts and select the form that they feel best expresses their learning.
Over time, Lewis discovered through these three specific assignments, that
the more student centered the solution to the problem was allowed to be,
the more meaningful the resultant learning was. When students were given
the opportunity for more control over what they included and how they
selected and presented that information, the more invested they were in the
practice when assigning eportfolios to students. While the students that she
was working with were preservice teachers, she believes that these ideas
can translate to students at all levels. She concludes that through seeking
feedback from colleagues and students, one can develop more meaningful
instruction.