SUPERVISED INDUSTRY TRAINING

ON-THE-JOB (OJT) TRAINING EVALUATION FORM

Dear Trainees:

The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the

Supervised Industry Training (SIT) or On the Job Training (OJT) you had with your
Industry Partners. Please check ( ) the appropriate box corresponding to your rating
for each question asked. The results of this evaluation shall serve as a basis for
improving the design and management of the SIT in SICAT to maximize the benefits
of the said Program. Thank you for your cooperation.

LEGEND:

5 Outstanding
4 Very Good/ Very Satisfactory
3 Good/Adequate
2 Fair/ Satisfactory
1 Poor/Unsatisfactory
NA Not Applicable

ITEM QUESTION RATINGS

No.

INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Conducted an orientation about the
1 SIT/OJT program, the requirements and
preparations needed and its expectations.
Provided the necessary assistance such as
2 referrals or recommendations in finding the
/
company for your OJT.
Showed coordination with the Industry
3 partner in the design and supervision of
your SIT/OJT.
Adequate to undertake Industry partner
4
assignment and its challenges.
5 Monitored your progress in the Industry.
Has the supervision been effective in
6 achieving your OJT objectives and providing
feedbacks when necessary?
Conduct assessment of your SIT/OJT
7
program upon completion.
 Were you provided with the results of the
8
Industry and assessment of your OJT?
Comments/Suggestions:

RATER A

Good/
Poor/Un- Fair/ Very Good/ Outstanding
Ad-
satisfactory Satisfactory Very
PREPARATION equate
Satisfactory

1 2 4 5
3
1. Workshop layout
conforms with
the components
of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM
is sufficient
3. Objectives of
every training
session is well
explained
4. Expected
activities/outputs
are clarified

RATER B

Good/
Poor/Un- Fair/ Very Good/ Outstanding
Ad-
satisfactory Satisfactory Very
PREPARATION equate
Satisfactory

1 2 4 5
3
1. Workshop layout
conforms with
the components
of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM
 is sufficient
3. Objectives of
every training
session is well
explained
4. Expected
activities/outputs
are clarified

RATER C

Good/
Poor/Un- Fair/ Very Good/ Outstanding
Ad-
satisfactory Satisfactory Very
PREPARATION equate
Satisfactory

1 2 4 5
3
1. Workshop layout
conforms with
the components
of a CBT
workshop
2. Number of CBLM
is sufficient
3. Objectives of
every training
session is well
explained
4. Expected
activities/outputs
are clarified
 AVERAGE RATINGS

PREPARATION Average

1. Workshop layout conforms with the components of a CBT

workshop

2. Number of CBLM is sufficient

3. Objectives of every training session is well explained

4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified

TOTAL

RANGE

0.00 - 1.49 = Poor/Unsatisfactory

1.50 - 2.49 = Fair/ Adequate

2.50 - 3.49 = Good/Satisfactory

3.50 - 4.49 = Very Good/Very Satisfactory

4.50 - 5.0 = Outstanding

General Interpretation:

____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________

Recommendation:

____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________