Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (GmbH & Co. KG) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Die Welt des Orients.
http://www.jstor.org
Richard W. Medina
Joban scholarship has overlooked a ritual treatment of Job 1:20-21. In view of this, after exploring
the practice of mourning rites in the context of ancient Israel and the Near East, this essay
endeavors to explain the social function of Job's ritual acts (tearing the garment, head-shaving, and
descent to the ground) and speech, in terms of A. van Gennep's and T. Turner's theories on ritual
process, the examination of biblical and extrabiblical parallels along with the syntax of theHebrew
verbs. It is concluded that themourning rites portrayed in Job 1:20-21 trigger the transformation
of Job's ordinary identity into an undefined or ambiguous identity; at the same time, theymark his
transition from day-to-day life to a liminal phase as identification with the dead. He remains in this
paradoxical condition until the end of mourning when he reintegrates into normal life and his
misfortune miraculously reverses (Job 42:7-17).
1. Connections
The Hebrew Bible describes a vast array of rituals1 connected with almost
every sphere of life.2Ritual texts exist in both prescriptive and descriptive
* This
essay is dedicated to my friend Gerald A. Klingbeil, who encouraged me to explore
ritual patterns in the Hebrew wisdom literature. Iwish to thank Bernd U. Schipper, JerryGladson,
Kathleen M. O'Connor and Walter Brueggemann for their kind help in commenting on an earlier
draft of this essay. I am also grateful to the anonymous referee for his/her beneficial remarks.
1 Jan Platvoet has provided an embracing definition of ritual thatmight be employed to de
fine or identify the ritual phenomena in the Hebrew Bible: "Ritual is that ordered sequence of
stylized social behaviour that may be distinguished from ordinary interaction by its alerting
-
qualities which enable it to focus the attention of its audiences its congregation as well as the
- onto
wider public itself and cause them to perceive it as a special event, performed at a special
place and/or time, for a special occasion and/or with a special message." J. Platvoet, "Ritual in
Plural and Pluralist Societies," in Pluralism and Identity: Studies in Ritual Behaviour (ed. J.
Platvoet and K. van der Toorn; SHR 67; Leiden: Brill, 1995), 41. For other definitions and a
see G.A.
comprehensive discussion of biblical rituals as well as their investigation to date,
Klingbeil, Bridging theGap: Ritual and Ritual Texts in theBible (BBRSup 1;Winona Lake, Ind.:
Eisenbrauns, 2007).
2 A wide-ranging discussion on ritual in the context of the cultural universe can be found in
G.A. Klingbeil, A Comparative Study of The Ritual of Ordination as Found in Leviticus 8 and
Emar 369 (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen, 1998), 5-52.
3 Compare the introduction of the terms in B.A. Levine, "The Descriptive Tabernacle Texts
of the Pentateuch," JAOS 85 (1965): 307-18; See also G. del Olmo Lete, Canaanite Religion
According to the Liturgical Texts of Ugarit (trans. W.G.E. Watson; Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisen
brauns, 2004), 14f.
4 G.A. Klingbeil, "'Momentaufhahmen' Importance of the Commu
of Israelite Religion: The
nal Meal ZAW 118 (2006): 24-25.
inNarrative Texts in I/II Regum and Their Ritual Dimension,"
5 R.L. Alden, Job (NAC; Nashville, Tenn.: Broadman & Holman, 1993), 61; S.E. Balentine,
Job (Smith & Helwys Bible Commentary; Macon, Ga.: Smith & Helwys, 2006), 56; D.J.A. Clines,
Job 1-20 (WBC 17; Dallas, Tex.: Word, 1989), 34-35; A. de Wilde, Das Buch Hiob. Engeleitet,
Ubersetzt und Erlautert (OTS22; Leiden: Brill, 1981), 89; J.H. Eaton, Job (Old Testament
Guides; Sheffield: JSOT,1992), 2; J.C.L. Gibson, Job (The Daily Study Bible; Philadelphia, Pa.:
Westminster, 1985), 16; N.C. Habel, The Book of Job: A Commentary (OTL; Philadelphia, Pa.:
Westminster, 1985), 93; J.E. Hartley, The Book of Job (NICOT; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans,
1988), 77; F. Hesse, Hiob (Zurcher Bibelkommentare 14; Theologischer Verlag: Zurich, 1992),
35; Gerald J. Janzen, Job (Interpretation; Atlanta, Ga.: JohnKnox Press, 1985), 43; CA. Newsom,
"The Book of Job," in The New Interpreter's Bible (ed. L.E. Keck; Nashville, Tenn.: Abingdon,
1996), 4:352; M.H. Pope, Job (AncB 15A; Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1965), 15; W.D.
Reyburn, A Handbook on the Book of Job (UBS Handbook Series; New York: United Bible
Societies, 1992), 53; D.J. Simundson, The Message of Job: A Theological Commentary (Augsburg
Old Testament studies; Minneapolis, Minn.: Augsburg, 1986), 37; E.B. Smick, "Job," in The
Expositor's Bible Commentary (ed. F.E. Gaebelein; Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan, 1988),
4:882; J.A. Wharton, Job (Westminster Bible Companion; Louisville, Ky.: Westminster, 1999),
20; G.H. Wilson, Job (NIBCOT; Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2007), 26, 28.
6 Robert K. Merton has made a distinction between manifest (objectives/consequences for
the actor) and latent functions (objectives/consequences for the community) for social behavior.
R.K. Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure (enlarged ed.; New York: Free Press, 1968), 114-20.
7 J.Gordon McConville postulates that ritual in theOT has been often denigrated in biblical
studies because of a supposed opposition it poses to "spiritual" religion, and the effort has even
been made to show that itwas regarded as passe by theOT itself (J.G. McConville, "The Place of
ritual inOld Testament Religion," IBS 3 [1981]: 120-33); though commenting on Priestly rituals,
Frank H. Gorman's insights are worth citing here: "[R]esearch has focused primarily on textual
analysis without great concern for the social nature of ritual. Rituals must be understood in terms
of their socio-cultural context. This demands a methodological shift ... from a text oriented
analysis to a socio-cultural analysis." F.H. Gorman, Jr., The Ideology of Ritual: Space, Time and
Status in thePriestly Theology (JSOTSup 229; Sheffield: JSOT, 1990), 13.
8 A comprehensive survey of past and recent scholarship on Job can be found in CA.
Newsom, "Considering Job," CurBS 1 (1993): 87-118; idem, "Re-Considering Job," CurBR 5
(2007): 155-82.
9 Based on the work of Mikhail Bakhtin, Carol A. Newsom argues that the book of Job
represents an attempt to create a dialogue of genres (voices) or a polyphonic text. She says that Job
issues, etc.10 or conversations about the reception history, excluding the book
of Job as a source of Israelite beliefs and practices.11 In view of this lassitude
towards ritual, after exploring the practice of mourning rites in the context of
the ancient Near East, I venture to explain the functions of the acts and speech
limned in Job 1:20-21, through a ritual theory and an examination of biblical
and extrabiblical parallels as well as the syntax of theHebrew verbs. Before
moving on to the next section, itwill be instructive to review Arnold van
Gennep's theory of "rites of passage" and Terence Turner's "hierarchy of
operations," which will serve as a theoretical approach for this study.
A. van Gennep points out that the life of an individual in any society is a
series of passages: "For every one of these events there are ceremonies whose
essential purpose is to enable the individual topass from one defined position
to another."12 These ceremonies, he calls rites of passage, involve separation,
transition (or the so-called liminal or threshold phase) and incorporation, and
are associated with those critical transition phases in life, such as birth, initia
tion, marriage, parenthood, and death. Although Turner criticizes van Gen
nep's ritual process as a linear series of moves or stages on the same level, he
does link itwith the notion of the transformationof identities in the form of a
vertical mediation between levels of operations of differing logical types:13
University of Chicago Press, 1960), 2-3, 10-11 (my italics); see also P.C. Rosenblatt, R.P. Walsh
and D.A. Jackson, Grief and Mourning inCross-Cultural Perspective (New Haven, Conn.: HRAF
Press, 1976), 86-87.
13 T. Turner, "Structure, Process, Form," in Theorizing Rituals: Issues, Topics, Approaches,
Concepts (ed. J.Kreinath, J. Snoek and M. Stausberg; Numen Book Series: Studies in theHistory
of Religions 114-1; Leiden: Brill, 2006), 212; cf. D. Handelman, "Framing," in Theorizing
Rituals: Issues, Topics, Approaches, Concepts (ed. J.Kreinath, J. Snoek and M. Stausberg; Numen
Book Series: Studies in theHistory of Religions 114-1; Leiden: Brill, 2006), 582.
powerful operations of a higher logical type than the simple negation or confirmation of the
... the rites
classificatory identities that comprise the initial and final phases of the ritual process
of separation and aggregation have this job of insulating the normative categories and relations ...
Between these two points, the initiands or other entities undergoing transitions or passages become
identified with the transformational processes of themedial or liminal phase of the ritual.14
Based upon the opinion of both authors, the rites of separation and incorpo
ration are devices that enable the individual to enter another sphere of reality.
They instigate and channel the transformative processes of social status and
space-time incidental. During the liminal or transitional phase, the person
temporarilyadopts a kind of "unidentifiedmeta-identity" as opposed to the ordi
nary identities of the initial and final phases.15 Accordingly, in a ritual ofmour
ning, by performing a series of rites (of separation) the participant enters into a
liminal stage as well as adopts a temporary ritual identity.Then he/she situates
"between theworld of the living and theworld of the dead,"16 taking on am
biguous "modes of behavior, which typically combine seclusion and with
drawal from ordinary social lifewith anti-social behavior."17The mourner's trans
formed status in this case appears incompatible with the normative statuses and
relations of the everyday world. The question on how this ritual performance
occurred in the ancient Near East is the subject of the ensuing section.
KTU1.5 VI 11-25
KTUX.5 VI 30-1.619
DIlu and cAnatu are exhibiting stereotypical mourning behaviors. When the
scene begins, DIlu is seated on his thronewith his feet on the footstool, pre
20 G.A. Anderson, A Time toMourn, A Time toDance: The Expression of Grief and Joy in
Israelite Religion (University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991), 60.
21 "The Baclu Myth," translated by D. Pardee (COS 1.86:267-68).
22 Based upon Ugaritic and Hebrew parallels of mourning customs, J.Glen Taylor argues that
the place to which DIlu and cAnatu descend (KTU 1.5 VI 25; 1.6 I 9) designates the netherworld
rather than the earth. J.G. Taylor, "The First and Last Thing to do inMourning: KTU 1.161 and
Some Parallels," inAscribe to the Lord: Biblical & Other Studies inMemory of Peter C Craigie
(ed. L. Eslinger and G. Taylor; JSOTSup 67; Sheffield: JSOT, 1988), 159-60.
sumably dressed in real attire. Upon hearing of Baclu's death, DIlu removes
himself from his seat,moves to his footstool, and finally lies on the ground. He
puts dirt on his head.23 Both DIlu and cAnatu are covered with girded garments,
pound their bodies, shave their faces, gashes their bodies, and cry out in
despair. Through stylized movements, acts and speech, they enter into the
liminal state of mourning, decouple from the sphere of day-to-day life and
adopt a transitoryritual identity.The fact that they explicitly declare that they
are descending to the underworld itself as identificationwith the dead Baclu
indicates that their perception of reality has been totally twisted; their lives
seem to have no sense or value without the living storm-god.
In ancient Israel, mourning riteswith descent to Sheol also signal the indi
vidual's entry into a betwixt and between condition. Not in every circumstance
is the term "mourning" used, but its function in a ritual sequence is clearly
seen.When Jacob learns of Joseph's death, he tears his clothes, girds his loins
with sackcloth, and mourns his son formany days (Gen 37:34). All his sons
and daughters come to console him, but he refuses to be comforted. Jacob says
he will go down as mourner to Sheol to his son. The scene closes with Jacob
weeping for his dead son (Gen 37:35). Other examples of realization ofmourn
ing rites at time of death can be cited. With his clothes torn and dirt on his
head, an Amalekite brings toDavid the news of Jonathan's and Saul's death (2
Sam 1:2; cf. 1 Sam 4:1 Iff). Likewise, David and his men tear their garments
when they receive this aggrieving message (2 Sam 1:11). Job's ritual enact
ment is another example of mourning the dead, which will be treated in detail
in the next section of this essay.
The first chapter of the book portrays three different scenes. The first one
reveals Job's geographical origin and identity,mentions his close and extended
-
family children, animals and servants -, and describes his children's feasts
and daily worship response toGod (1:1-5). The next scene takes place in the
presence of God. Satan puts into question the genuineness of Job's integrity;
and the Lord gives him permission to destroy Job's family and possessions
(1:6-12). The last view seems to reverse the first one. It shows the loss of
Job's family - animals and children - and the enactment of a ritual of mourn
ing (1:13-22). The passage of Job 1:20-21 represents a piece of ritual text that
pictures, as a photograph, Job's movements, actions and speech signaling a
social transition in his life.24
T
^nnin
nn^i 21
t?k pap -n^ cni?
rrjrr
J<]n3
njrn
npxbT
a
20 And Job arose,
b
and tore his robe,
c
and sheared his head,
d
and fell to the ground,
e
and bowed down,25
a
21 and said:
b
"Naked came I out26 of my mother's womb,
c
and naked will I return there;
d
YHWH has given,
e
and YHWH has taken away;
f
may the name of YHWH be blessed."
25 For a very long time the perfect ninntfnwas regarded as a Hithpael form of nno inwhich
metathesis had ocurred. However, research intoUgaritic has clearly indicated that it is a relic from
an earlier stage of the language. One is here dealing with a verb stem mn that is used in a stem
formation towhich a /hist-/or lyistl syllable is added. Only one verb occurs in this stem formation,
namely mn, "to bow" (See C.H.J, van der Merwe, J.A. Naude and J.H. Kroeze, A Biblical Hebrew
Reference Grammar [Biblical Languages: Hebrew 3; New York: Sheffield, 2002], 139). Corre
+ verb
spondenly, Ttnsn. can be parsed as waw consecutive Histafel imperfect 3rd masc. sing.
26 Although the reading ^nir iswell supported by theMT and theAleppo Codex, it appears as
-
enlarged by an Daleph, tiks% in the Qere orthography and in some Hebrew medieval manuscripts
edited by B. Kennicott (1776, 1780), J.B. de Rossi (1784), and CD. Ginsburg (1908-1926). The
difference between both readings is the omission and inclusion of the Daleph. Ancient Phoenician
-
inscriptions, which predate Hebrew, do not indicate thematres lectionis which were later added
-
to the original Hebrew script to facilitate the reading either in themiddle or at the end of a word.
Accordingly, the absence of the Jaleph in Tiy could reveal an early orthography practice. Another
explanation might be that the scribe(s) probably considered the Jaleph as quiescent, thus omitted it
and transferred its vowel to the preceding letter (cf. E. Kautszch and A.E. Cowley, Gesenius'
Hebrew Grammar [2d ed.; Oxford: Clarendon, 1910], ? 23/, 14k; cf. P. Joiion and T. Muraoka, A
Grammar of Biblical Hebrew [SubBi 14; 2 vols.; Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 1991],
? 78/). For alike spelling occurrences see E. Tov, Textual Criticism of theHebrew Bible (2d rev.
ed.; Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress, 2001), 255; P.K. McCarter, Jr., Textual Criticism: Recovering
the Text of theHebrew Bible (GBS 2; Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress, 1986), 54-55.
Table 1: A Global View of Verbal Forms and Grammatical Constructions of Job 1:20-21
The ritual
perfomance is shown as framed by six sussessive
WAYYIQTOLs,28 which capture the nature of Job's acts, movement and
speech, stress their order, secuence and interreladtedness: Tinun n^")k
Sept ItfKTnK Tjn ibm-m I7np?5 d??i, "And Job arose, and' tore'his
robe, and sheared his head, and fell to the ground, and bowed down, and said".
Interestingly, every disaster save one (Job 1:17) features the root bs: 'fall'
27 G.A. Klingbeil, "The Syntactic Structure of the Ritual of Ordination (Lev 8)," Biblica 11
(1996): 509-19; see also R.W. Medina, "La estructura sintactica y la interpretation de Exodo 6:2
9," DavarLogos 4.2 (2005): 101-15.
28 For a methodological foundation for this textual analysis, see here A. Niccacci, The Syntax
of the Verb in Classical Hebrew Prose (trans. W.G.E. Watson; JSOTSup 86; Sheffield: JSOT,
1990), 23-34, 163-91; idem, "Finite Verb in the Second Position of the Sentence. Coherence of
theHebrew Verbal System," ZAW 108 (1996): 434-40; cf. L. Vegas Montaner, "Sintaxis del verbo
hebreo biblico: nuevas tendencias," in Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century.
Proceedings of the 6th EAJS Congress Toledo, July 1998. Volume I: Biblical, Rabbinical, and
Medieval Studies (ed. J. Targarona Borras and A. Saenz-Badillos; Leiden: Brill, 1999), 222-31;
B.K. Waltke and M. O'Connor, An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax (Winona Lake, Ind.:
Eisenbrauns, 1990), 547-54.
until Job himself, after 'arising' finally succumbs and falls too.29The sixth
WAYYIQTOL embraces a two-element syntactic construction.30 The first
element is composed of two compound clauses forming together the protasis:
natf nitiK b"ifi *m ]M? m*??] CPSJ) Dny, "Naked came I out of my
mother's womb, and naked will I return there;" and ngb rnrn ]nj rniT,
"YHWH has given, and YHWH has taken away." The second element of the
construction includes one simple clause operating as the apodosis: 'IP'!
Dtf VT, "may the name of YHWH be blessed."31 In addition, there is a merism
created by the contrasting verbs "come out," and 2Wy "return;" another
merism is in the second compound clause with the antithesis of the verbs ]n3,
"give," and npb, "take away."32
' >
ofBirth
Metaphor 1 ( ofYHWH
TheGratuity
"Naked came I out of my mother's womb" /?K "YHWH has given"
,_(x-QATAL)_J [_(x-QATAL)_,
/-\ /-\
Metaphor of Death The Taking Away ofYHWH
"and naked will I return there" /?\ "and YHWH has taken away"
^_(WAW-x-YIQTOL)_J [_(WAW-x-QATAL)_t
f BlessingofYHWH's Name 1
"may the name of YHWH be blessed" ^
s_(YIQTOL)_t
29 V. Hoffer, "Illusion, Allusion, and Literary Artifice in the Frame Narrative of Job," in The
Whirlwind: Essays on Job, Hermeneutics and Theology inMemory of Jane Morse (ed. S.L. Cook,
C.L. Patton and J.W.Watts; JSOTSup 336; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2001), 97.
30 For my analysis here, I follow Niccacci's views on the two-element syntactic construction
(2SC) to see the inner relationships of clauses. For convenience the first element of the 2SC is
called the "protasis" and the second the "apodosis" even though they do not refer exclusively to a
conditional clause. For more details see Niccacci, The Sintax of the Verb, 125-62.
31 Waltke and O'connor, Biblical Hebrew Syntax, 422, observe that rpba, "blessed," is a delo
cutive productive Pual. They mean by "delocutive" a verbal form referring to a speech act.
32 Alden, 706,62.
The above arrangement will serve to explain in detail how the accomplish
ment of some rites triggered the transformationof Job's everyday identity into
an undefined or ritual identity.As shown in biblical and extrabiblical texts,
Job's reaction to disaster constitutes a sequence of stylized social behavior and
speech that are distinguished from an ordinary event. His ritual performance
includes threequalities: ritual opening, ritual actions and ritual language.
Job is in the outdoors sitting on a bench, chair or couch, in the accepted
mode of persons. Immediately after hearing the calamities, he indicates the
beginning of his ritual of mourning by an upward movement: Dp5;!, "and
Job arose." Once the ritual is initiated, he proceeds on ripping his clothes:
^IM3T1K snpal, "and tore his robe." This robe was, perhaps, a type of cloak
wrapped around the body and the undergarments (cf. 1 Sam 15:27; Ps 109:29;
Ezra 9:3; Job 2:12).
The judgment of the peoples of the ancient Near East on clothing differs
radically from that of our Western conception of it. For them clothing is an
extension of an individual's personality. The removal of clothes is considered
as much more serious than a mere physical matter. This is indicated by a
number of texts.33The stripping or removing of the garment could signal a
breakup with material world,34 loss of status or identity, or loss of divine
protection, and a great shame. By stripping his robe, Job separates from his last
bond on earth, thematerial world. In fact, garments were expensive in the
ancient Near East, and a great proportion of the population possibly possessed
just one garment. Material things lost their usefulness and value once Job's
animals, servants, and children were lost. He loses his social status (Num
20:26) as well; he remains at least partially naked, "resulting in public
shame"35 (cf. Job 2:8). And nakedness means a loss of identity. Identity in the
widest sense of theword can in the firstplace be given expression by clothing
and clothes. The wearing of garments are also part of divine protection (Gen
2:25; 3:7; 3:21); hence the removing of themmeans loss of it.36
Being partially naked, Job is ritually defiled. Purity refers to the perception
of things, persons, etc. being "in place" according to the value system of a
given culture. And pollution refers towhat is 'out of place.' Nudity is always
"out of place." Likewise, clothing is a boundary for the physical body, which
is a microcosm of the social system. Nudity means the complete absence of
boundaries; the body is accessible to any and every one, thus destroying its
exclusivity as "set Boundaries must be maintained, and so
something apart."
nudity is unclean.37 For that reason, Job, symbolically and temporarily, being
unclothed, resembles theirbeloved dead.
In several Akkadian texts, the removal of garments denoted identification
with the dead. This can be seen, for example, in theDescent of Ishtar inwhich
as she enters the netherworld, according to the rites there, she is stripped of all
her jewelry and garment at each of the seven gates. By her nakedness she
becomes assimilated with dead. Then Ereshkigal, the goddess of the nether
world, strikes herwith sixty deadly diseases.
33 P.A. Kruger, "The Symbolic Significance of the Hem (kanaf) in 1 Samuel 15.27," in Text
and Context: Old Testament and Semitic Studies for F C Fensham (ed. W. Claassen; JSOTSup 48;
Sheffield: JSOT, 1988), 106.
34 M.E. Vogelzang and W.J. van Bekkum, "Meaning and Symbolism of Clothing inAncient
Near Eastern Texts," in Scripta Signa Vocis (ed. H.L.J. Vanstiphout et al.; Groningen: Egbert
Forsten, 1986), 267.
35 Klingbeil, Bridging theGap, 175.
36 Vogelzang and van Bekkum, "Meaning and Symbolism of Clothing," 273.
37 J.H. Neyrey, "Nudity," inBiblical Social Values and Their Meaning: A Handbook (ed. J.J.
Pilch and B.J. Malina; Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1993), 122-23.
He let her in through the seventh door, but stripped off (60)
(and) took away the proud garment of her body.
"Gatekeeper, why have you taken away the proud garment of my body?"
"Go in,my lady. Such are the rites of theMistress of Earth."
3.2 Head-Shaving
Job's second ritual action consists of polling his head. With a razor, he
"sheared his head" carefully, deliberately. Hair "transmitted a message about
life of the person as an individual."39 Since hair continues to grow throughout
life (and appears to do so for a time after death), itwas considered by the
ancients to be the seat of a man's vitality and life force, and in ritual it often
served as his substitute.A bowl dating from the ninth century B.C. found in a
Cypriot temple contains an inscription on its outside surface indicating that it
contained the hair of the donor. Itwas placed there, if the reconstructed text is
correct, as "a memorial" toAstarte, as a permanent reminder to the goddess of
the donor's devotion."40 Thus Job's head-shaving is a rite that symbolizes the
loss of his life and, by extension, assimilation of himself to the dead. It also
signals Job's entry into a state of pollution, effects a transition in his status and
serves as a public, temporarymarker of his change of identity (cf. Num 6;
5:11-28; 30:2; Deut 21:10-14).41
Aside from taking on the appearance of the dead - devoid of everything and
almost entirely naked -, there is also evidence that Job imitates themovement
of the dead to the underworld through a ritual descent to the ground as 3Ilu and
cAnatu did in theirmourning over Baclu.
Mayer I. Gruber has long argued that infill nS"|K bp**), "and fell to the
ground and bowed down," should be understood as acts of homage, respect or
grief. Because his philological analysis is convincing and his interpretation
38 "Descent of Ishtar," translated by S. Dalley (COS 1:382). The Akkadian cuneiform text
corresponding to this section along with its transliteration can be found inR. Borger, Bahylonisch
Assyrische Lesestucke (Roma: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum, 1963), 11-90, III-Tafel 57.
39 P. Galpaz-Feller, "Hair in the Bible and inAncient Egyptian Culture," BN 125 (2005): 75.
40 J.Milgrom, Leviticus 17-22: A New Translation with Introduction and
Commentary (AB
3A; New York: Doubleday, 2000), 1802.
41 For a study about shaving as a rite of transition in theOT,
especially in the Pentateuch, see
S.M. Olyan, "What Do Shaving Rites Accomplish and What Do they Signal in Biblical Ritual
Contexts?" JBL (1998): 611-22.
42 M.I. Gruber, Aspects of Nonverbal Communication in the Ancient Near East (2 vols.;
Studia Pohl 12; Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1980), 1:96. For a more comprehensive explanation
of posture of prayer and worship, see esp. 1:90-178.
43 Ibid., 1:96-97.
44 Ibid., 2:469-70.
45 O. Keel, The Symbolism of theBiblical World: Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the
Book ofPsalms (trans. T.J. Hallett; Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 1997), 310, fig. 413.
46 E. Feldman, Biblical and Post-Biblical Defilement and Mourning: Law as Theology
(Library of Jewish Law and Ethics; New York: Yeshiva University Press, 1977), 139.
47 Ibid., 18.
48 Ibid., 139-140.
49 The adverb "there" is often "interpreted as an epithet of the underworld." See W.L. Michel,
"Confidence and Despair: Job 19,25-27 in the Light of Northwest Semitic Studies," in The Book
of Job (ed. W.A.M. Beuken; BETL 114; Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1994), 170-71.
50 Cf. Ps 72:19; 96:2; 100:4; 113:2; 145:1; Neh 9:5. Johannes C. de Moor notes in this sen
tence a resemblance with a line from the Ugaritic tale of Aqhat, where DanPil invokes the spirits
of the dead heroes to revive his son: "the blessing of the name of Ilu gave substance to the heroes."
See J.C. de Moor, An Anthology of Religious Texts from Ugarit (Religious Texts Translation
Series NISABA 16; Leiden: Brill, 1987), 272.
51 W. Vogels, "Job's Empty Pious Slogans (Job 1,20-22; 2,8-10)," in The Book of Job (ed.
W.A.M. Beuken; BETL 114; Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1994), 370-71.
52 M. McVann, "Patience," in Biblical Social Values and Their Meaning: A Handbook (ed.
J.J.Pilch and B.J. Malina; Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 1993), 131.
53 R.E. Murphy, The Tree of Life: An Exploration of Biblical Wisdom Literature (3d ed.;
Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 2002), 37.
54 O. Keel and C. Uehlinger, Gods, Goddesses, and Images of God in Ancient Israel (trans.
T.H. Trapp; Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress, 1998), 367.
(SI
R. Ill ,)
Figure 3 is an 11 cm. high clay relief from Larsa Period (ca. 1960-1860
B.C.), housed inBaghdad Museum. It depicts Mother Earth, the great bearer,
mistress of the earth-mountain (Ninhursag), mistress of bearing (Nintu). At her
left and right are crouched two fetuses. Two infants' head project from her
shoulders, just as rays shoot forthfrom the shoulders of the sun god and water
and fish leap forthfrom the shoulders of Ea. At her breast, the goddess gives
suck to a child (shown only by its head and one arm). The symbol on either
side of the goddess has been interpretedas swaddling band, or as the uterus of
a cow, themother animal par excellence.55
Accordingly, Job's stereotyped utterance represented not only words of res
ignation, in the positive view, but also words of ritual confession and respect
addressed not toNinhursag, Nintu, the sun god or Ea, but toYHWH, the real
Mother Earth, the trueLord and Bearer of life in theHebrew Scriptures.
4. Conclusions
This essay has attempted to explain the social function of Job's ritual actions
and speech as portrayed in Job 1:20-21, in termsof a ritual theory, the analysis
of biblical and extrabiblical parallels along with the syntax of the Hebrew
verbs. In Job's entrance tomourning, the tearing of the garment suggests loss