Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Oxford University Press and The Past and Present Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve
and extend access to Past &Present.
http://www.jstor.org
4Ibid., 191-2.
II
In early1952 de Martinodelivereda lecturein Florenceon his
recentstudiesof Lucania. This containedsome ofhis earliest
on the cultureof the southernpeasantry.Lucania
reflections
was an area he knewnot onlyfromearliervisitsforethno-
graphicpurposes,but also fromhis organizingeffortsforleftist
unionsand theSocialistand Communistparties.'4Much ofhis
stronglyautobiographicalaccount directlyconcernedLevi's
book. Afterreadingaloud fromthe firstpage of Eboli, de
Martinoaddressedhead-on the visionof the South whichit
presented.For Levi, he stated,'peasantLucania is essentially
14For these and other details regardingde Martino (Naples, 1908 - Rome,
1965), see the year-to-year biographicalsummaryin Cesare Bermani,'Le date di
una vita', in Tra furoree valore:Ernestode Martino(special issue of II de Martino:
Bollettino Ernestode Martino,v-vi, 1996). My thanksto Giovanni Levi
dell'Istituto
forprovidingme witha copy ofthis.
23While Aby
Warburg'sname is not mentionedat any point,this atlas of ges-
tures bears a strongresemblanceto his unfinished'Mnemosyne' project. It is
equally impossibleto overlookthe many othersimilaritiesbetweende Martino's
cultural historyand Warburg's, rangingfrom the emphasis on the long-term
culturalcontinuities(includingritualaspects) fromancientto modem timesto the
(cont.onp. 11)
(n. 23 cont.)
parallelbetweenthenotionsofde Martino's 'crisisofpresence'
andWarburg's 'loss
ofself',thelatterexperiencedbyactorsin ancientdramasandbymodernartists.
On thespecificconnections
between them,seeGallini'sintroduction
to de Martino,
Mortee piantorituale,
p. xxxii;GiovanniAgostiandMaurizioSciuto,'L'Atlantedel
piantodi Ernestode Martino', inDi Donato(ed.),La contraddizione 185-6;
felice?,
Riccardo Di Donato, I Greciselvaggi:antropologia
storicadi Ernestode Martino
(Rome,1999),41-4. Moregenerally
on theseissues,see LouisRose,TheSurvival
ofImages:ArtHistorians, and theAncients(Detroit,2001), 55-64.
Psychoanalysts,
24Despitehisstatusas a founder
ofItaliananthropology, thereis relatively
little
by or on de Martinoin English,apartfromversions ofhis 1948bookon magic
published(undervarioustitles)bypressesspecializing
in esoterica.
For a succinct
introductionthatstressesthemultiple waysin whichhisworkanticipates many
oftheconcernsofpresent-day anthropology,see GeorgeR. Saunders,'"Critical
Ethnocentrism"andtheEthnology ofErnestoDe Martino', Amer.Anthropologist,
xcv(1993). A somewhat morescepticalpresentation,albeitstronglyin sympathy
withde Martino'saims,canbe foundinAnnalisaDi Nola,'How CriticalWas De
Martino's"CriticalEthnocentrism" in SouthernItaly?',in JaneSchneider(ed.),
Italy's 'SouthernQuestion':Orientalism
in One Country(Oxford, 1998); see also
GeorgeR. Saunders, 'The MagicoftheSouth:PopularReligion andEliteCatholi-
cismin ItalianEthnology',ibid.On theotherhand,thereis a rapidlygrowing
bibliographyon de Martinoin Italianand French.Apartfromtheworkslistedin
thesenotes,see GiuseppeGalasso,Croce,Gramscie altristorici
(Milan,1969),esp.
222-335; Paolo Cherchi and Maria Cherchi,ErnestoDe Martino:dalla crisidella
alla comuniti
presenza umana(Naples,1987),themostextensive ofseveralstudies
of de Martinoby theseauthors;Clara Galliniand MarcelloMassenzio(eds.),
Ernestode Martinonellaculturaeuropea(Naples, 1997); Di Donato, I Greciselvaggi,
whichcontainsa bibliography of his writings drawnup by Mario
(originally
Gandini)on pp. 211-28. See also GiordanaCharutyand Carlo Severi(eds.),
'Dossier:Ernestode Martino',Gradhiva,
xxvi(1999).
25Cited in Carlo Ginzburg,'Momigliano e de Martino', Rivistastoricaitaliana,
c (1988),405.
26Ernestode Martino,II mondomagico:prolegomeni
a una storiadelmagismo(1948;
Turin,1997).The 1997revisededition,
whichI haveused,includesan excellent
introduction
byCesareCases.
III
The balanceofcontinuity versuschangeis notonlya classic
issuein historiography.It is also a classicalone,in thatuntil
recently,culturalhistoryandanthropology owedmuchoftheir
forward movement to theirendlessgrappling withthepeculiar
problem ofhow to understand ancient or 'pagan'survivals in
laterEuropean cultures. A goodpart of the prehistoryofboth
disciplinescould be written withthissingle,and singularly
vexed,question inmind.35
Partoftheintellectual background ofde Martino's owncon-
tributioninvolvestheunusually prominent rolethathisnative
cityofNaplesplayedinthiscenturies-old debate.36 Apartfrom
thepioneering worksofVico,twomilestones intheemergence
of comparative ethnology via the studyof Antiquity are of
particularrelevance.The first involved the'discovery' in 1781
ofphallus-shaped ex-votos in Isernia(Molise)bySirWilliam
Hamilton, whosewritings onthesubjectbrought themtointer-
nationalattention.37
The other wasAndreadeJorio's La mimica
nelgestire
degliantichiinvestigata (1832), a pioneering
napoletano
workin thehistoryofgestureby a local cleric.38In bothcases
puzzles withincontemporary popular culture- the strange
cult of Sts Cosmas and Damian thatinvolvedphallicvotive
offeringsby sterilewomen,and theexquisitely elaboratecoded
languageof Neapolitangesture- weresolvedby recourseto
antiquarian research.The pastthusservedto explainthepresent
in whichit was stillembedded,and whiledoingso it brought
thetentative ofcultural
disciplines andethnology
history together
ina common approachtothestudyofculture.
40De Martino,Mortee
piantorituale,308.
41See Ginzburg,'Momiglianoe de Martino',406, forde Martino'scharacterization
of metapsychologicalphenomenaas 'a relict... of a magicalcivilization'.For exam-
ples,see hisMortee piantorituale,
56-7, 225, 308; and his Terradelrimorso,
13, 26.
42De Martino,Mortee piantorituale,45.
43 Ibid., 56.
44Ibid.,57.
45Ibid.,58.
46Ibid., 67-8.
47Ibid.,252 n.
48This was an all too familiarcriticismof Frazer's methodology.For other
instances,see RobertAckerman, J. G. Frazer.His Lifeand Work(Cambridge,1990),
passim. In de Martino's view, at least two other 'Frazerian' mistakeswere to be
avoided - evolutionism,and its opposite, that is, overlookingthe differences
between ancient and modern by collapsingtextstogether:see his Mortee pianto
rituale,11, 36-7, 43.
waterhad flowedunderthebridgesincethepublicationofthe
GoldenBough.Ethnologywas now a much changeddiscipline
de Martinowas virtually
and, significantly, thelastofitsfound-
ing fathersto have received - like Frazer - his trainingelse-
where,in classics.
The forestat Aricciaon Lake Nemi was a locus ofepiphany
for Frazer, much as the Capitoline had been for Gibbon.
Frazer closed the firsteditionof the GoldenBoughwiththe
claimthatfromNemi - a 'place [that]has changedbut little
since Diana receivedthe homage of her worshippersin the
sacred grove' - he could hear in the distancethe bells of
Rome. As theytolled the call forAngelus,he exclaimedthe
famouslast words,'Le roiestmort,vivele roi!Ave Maria!'49
Few readersare likelyto forgetsuch a passage. Fewer still
could overlookthe artfulway in whichFrazerdrewa line of
directcontinuitybetweenritualin the distantpast and its
descendantswithinmodernity. In theend,bytakingthiscon-
for
tinuity granted, Frazer placed it out of time.De Martino,
drawnto verymuchthesame subjectsyetdepartingfromdif-
ferentpremisesand employingdifferent methods,moved in
the otherdirection.In so doing,he soughtto restoreculture
to therealmofhistory.
IV
Carlo Levi presentedritualmourningas one practiceamong
manywithinthebroaderculturaluniverseofthesouthernpeas-
antrythatstoodoutsidetime.De Martino,on theotherhand,
realizedthatit was a relicfroma distantpast thatwas nearing
theend ofitsexistence.Froma familiar stanceofethnographic
melancholy, a
temperedby Marxist-inspired hope in imminent
collectiveliberation,he saw itsdeathas thepassingawayofone
ofthelastremaining vestigesofpeasantarchaism.De Martino
recordedmourning's trajectoryfromancientplenitudethrough
medievalchallengeto modernirrelevance. Whatdistinguished
his studyfroman obituary,however,was not onlythe close
attention he devotedto thefinalsurviving remainsoftheprac-
tice. It was also the absence of a postmortem. How and why
49Sir James George Frazer, The New GoldenBough, ed. Theodor H. Gaster
(1890; abridgedand revised,New York, 1964), 741-2.
50See the studies in Ralph Houlbrooke (ed.), Death, Ritual, and Bereavement
(London, 1989); Ralph Houlbrooke,'The PuritanDeath-Bed, c.1560-c.1660', in
ChristopherDurston and JacquelineEales (eds.), TheCultureofEnglishPuritanism,
1560-1700 (London, 1996); and esp. Ralph Houlbrooke, 'Civility and Civil
Observancesin theEarlyModem EnglishFuneral',in PeterBurke,BrianHarrison
and Paul Slack (eds.), Civil Histories:
EssaysPresentedtoSir KeithThomas(Oxford,
2000). See also Bruce Gordon and Peter Marshall (eds.), The Place of theDead:
Death and Remembrance in Late Medieval and Early ModernEurope(Cambridge,
2000); Craig M. Koslofsky,TheReformation oftheDead: Death and Ritualin Early
Modern Germany,1450-1700 (Basingstoke, 2000); Jean Balsamo (ed.), Les
Funiraillesa la Renaissance(Geneva, 2002).
51PhilippeAries,TheHour ofourDeath,trans.Helen Weaver(New York, 1981);
NorbertElias, The CivilizingProcess,trans.Edmund Jephcott,2 vols. (New York,
1978-82).
V
These fourhypotheses are notmutuallyexclusive.In fact,they
thanksto theirrootsin a specificIberian
shareclose affinities,
historyof imperialexpansionand (failed)religiouspluralism.
On balance,Spain sheltereda numberofsignificant variations
on the themeof the reformof mourning.Yet, seen froma
broaderperspective,its path followedthe generalEuropean
so muchso thatitcould serveas a convincing
trajectory, substi-
tuteforthe lengthystage- roughlyfromthefifteenth to the
midtwentieth centuries- omittedfromde Martino'ssketchof
thesubjectforItaly.In bothpeninsulastheprofusion oficono-
graphicreferences to or
plahiideras (and
'specialist' often paid)
mournerscharacteristic ofthelaterMiddleAgesseemsto have
turnedintoa dearthduringthesixteenth century. This, and the
everscarcermentionin synodalconstitutions ofritualmourn-
ing practicesneedingreform, pointto an obviousconclusion:
thatas faras the chronologyof the disciplining of mourning
is
practices concerned, in mostplaces the deed was done well
beforetheimposition ofTridentinenorms.Indeed,mostofthe
hard work of reformmay have ended earlier.This would
explainwhyErasmus,in his dialogue on mortuarycustoms
publishedin 1526, contrastedthe simple,Christiandeathand
burialhe upheldas a modelnotwithritualmourning, butwith
VI
The disappearanceofritualmourning in southernEuropethus
tookplace in two stages.The first,whichcoveredroughlythe
periodfromthefourteenth to thesixteenth sawdiverse
centuries,
pressurescombiningto relegatelamentfromcityto country,
thetruehomeofpaganism.Whatchangedherewas itscontext;
the languageand gesturesof collectivemourningapparently
weatheredthe shiftlargelyuntouched.The second phase can
be morepreciselydatedto themiddleand laterdecades ofthe
twentiethcentury.Duringa relatively briefperiodof timethe
ofvillagelifeinthemargins
'modernization' oftheMediterranean
brought to a definitive
endcultural as wellas socialandeconomic
of
practices profoundchronologicaldepth,mourningamong
them.
This fatefulmomentalso witnessedthe encounterof Carlo
Levi and Ernestode Martino.Their meetingnot onlyconsti-
tutes an episode in modernItalian intellectualhistorythat
deservesto be betterknownbutitalso bringsto theforeseveral
staple problematicsin the widerworldof historicalthought,
above all the classic'dog in thenight'questionaboutwhether
changeor itsabsencecountsmostin thelengthy haulfrompast
to present.Not surprisingly, theproblemofcontinuity has long
hauntedhistoricalanalysisof the Mediterranean. It pervades
theworkofitsmostfamousstudent,FernandBraudel,as well
as recentcounter-thrusts in a moreculturaldirection,such as
PeregrineHordenand NicholasPurcell'sTheCorrupting Sea.72
Few subjectsevokethe problemof millennialcontinuities as
vividlyas does ritual
lament. Discovery in the of
villages southern
Italyin themidtwentieth centuryofpreciselythesame words,
gestures and protagonists as thosedocumented in ancientEgypt,
Judaea, Greece and Rome understandably led observers to place
overriding emphasis on the role the common Mediterranean
contextplayedin rituallament'scapacityto persist.
Levi locatedmourning and otherpopularpracticesin theter-
rainofmyth;de Martinostruggled to restorethemto history.
Profoundly struckbythesimilitudes betweenAntiquity and the
ethnographic present,de Martinoexposedthedeeperaffinities
amonglamentsacrossa sweepingrangeoftimeand place. Yet
he also beganto charttheshiftsand departures in register,per-
formanceand function.The outcomewas a unique,if provi-
sional,performance ofhis own. Deathand RitualMourning is a
workrichin empathy,learningand analyticalimagination. By
applyingthesame modelto contextstoo numerousand varied
to bear its weight,it nevertheless ends up by subordinating
historyto a psychologicalreductionismthat forcesancient
Universidad Madrid
Aut6noma, JamesS. Amelang