Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Thin-Walled Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tws
a r t i c l e in f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Fire safety design of building structures has received greater attention in recent times due to continuing
Received 9 September 2009 loss of properties and lives during res. However, re performance of light gauge cold-formed steel
Received in revised form structures is not well understood despite its increased usage in buildings. Cold-formed steel
24 November 2009
compression members are susceptible to various buckling modes such as local and distortional
Accepted 26 November 2009
buckling and their ultimate strength behaviour is governed by these buckling modes. Therefore a
Available online 22 January 2010
research project based on experimental and numerical studies was undertaken to investigate the
Keywords: distortional buckling behaviour of light gauge cold-formed steel compression members under
Light gauge cold-formed steel members simulated re conditions. Lipped channel sections with and without additional lips were selected
Distortional buckling
with three thicknesses of 0.6, 0.8, and 0.95 mm and both low and high strength steels (G250 and G550
Numerical modelling
steels). More than 150 compression tests were undertaken rst at ambient and elevated temperatures.
Elevated temperatures
Fire safety design Finite element models of the tested compression members were then developed by including the
degradation of mechanical properties with increasing temperatures. Comparison of nite element
analysis and experimental results showed that the developed nite element models were capable of
simulating the distortional buckling and strength behaviour at ambient and elevated temperatures up
to 800 1C. The validated model was used to determine the effects of mechanical properties, geometric
imperfections and residual stresses on the distortional buckling behaviour and strength of cold-formed
steel columns. This paper presents the details of the numerical study and the results. It demonstrated
the importance of using accurate mechanical properties at elevated temperatures in order to obtain
reliable strength characteristics of cold-formed steel columns under re conditions.
& 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0263-8231/$ - see front matter & 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tws.2009.11.004
ARTICLE IN PRESS
T. Ranawaka, M. Mahendran / Thin-Walled Structures 48 (2010) 334344 335
Refs. [1,5,6,9,11] and [13] and [7]. Feng et al. [5,6] undertook local
and distortional buckling studies using both experimental and
numerical analyses. They showed that ambient temperature
design method can be used to predict the strengths of short
cold-formed steel columns at elevated temperatures provided
appropriately reduced mechanical properties are used in the Pyrocrete
relevant calculations. End 165 coil grout
In practical applications, cold-formed steel studs are often plates
protected by plasterboard or similar boards, resulting in studs
being subject to a non-uniform temperature condition. However,
if the maximum temperature in the studs can be estimated for a Test specimen
re event, the stud compression strength under re conditions
can be estimated using a uniform elevated temperature design
method. Hence past research has used this simpler uniform
elevated temperature approach in their research [5,6,11,13]
However, Feng et al. [7] extended their work to include the Fig. 1. Cold-formed steel compression members tested by Ranawaka and
important effects of non-uniform elevated temperatures on the Mahendran [14].
axial strength of cold-formed steel channels using numerical
studies.
b
To date the relatively new distortional buckling behaviour of t s
cold-formed steel members has not been investigated in detail at
elevated temperatures using both experimental and numerical h h
studies. Therefore detailed experimental and numerical studies t
d
were undertaken to investigate the pure distortional buckling
b
behaviour of light gauge cold-formed steel compression members Type A Type B
at uniform elevated temperatures. This research considered only
the uniform elevated temperature conditions as the aim of this Fig. 2. Cold-formed steel sections used in this research.
research was to understand rst the pure distortional buckling
behaviour at uniform elevated temperatures. It also included an
investigation into the mechanical properties of steels at elevated Table 1
Dimensions of selected cold-formed steel sections.
temperatures. Experimental studies on the distortional buckling
of cold-formed steel compression members at ambient and Section Thickness (mm) Section sizes (mm) Lengtha
elevated temperatures and the results have been presented by (mm)
Ranawaka and Mahendran [14] whereas the measured elevated Nominal BMT- BMT- h b d s
G250b G550b
temperature mechanical properties of steels used in this research
are given in Ref. [15]. In this paper the details of numerical studies Type A 0.60 0.54 0.60 30 30 5 200
on the distortional buckling of cold-formed steel compression 0.80 0.75 0.80 30 30 5 180
members at ambient and elevated temperatures are presented. 0.95 0.94 0.95 30 35 5 180
The mechanical properties of the cold-formed steels used in the Type B 0.60 0.54 0.60 40 30 5 10 280
compression tests [15] were used in the numerical studies. This 0.80 0.75 0.80 40 30 5 10 240
paper presents the details of this numerical study and the results. 0.95 0.94 0.95 40 30 5 10 220
a
Length of specimen between the end plates.
b
Measured mean values of base metal thicknesses (BMT).
2. Numerical modelling
Numerous nite element analysis programs are available for cross-section sizes, the nominal and measured base metal
research purposes that can eliminate the excessive resource and thicknesses and the member lengths used in this numerical study.
time requirements of experimental studies. In this research, Initial analyses were undertaken at ambient temperature
ABAQUS standard version 6.3 was used to simulate the distor- followed by those at elevated temperatures. Both elastic buckling
tional buckling behaviour of light gauge cold-formed steel and nonlinear analyses were undertaken at varying temperatures
compression members at both ambient and elevated tempera- using appropriate mechanical properties, initial geometric im-
tures. Since this numerical study was related to the experimental perfections and residual stresses. The numerical results were
tests reported in Ref. [14] the same cold-formed steel compres- compared with the corresponding experimental results for
sion members used by them (Fig. 1) were analysed at six different validation purposes.
temperatures in the range of 20800 1C with xed-end support
conditions (a total of 72 cases). Two types of cold-formed sections
shown in Fig. 2 (Types A and B sections lipped C-sections with 2.1. Elements
and without additional lips) were modelled with three
thicknesses of 0.60, 0.80 and 0.95 mm and two steel grades of Suitable elements should be chosen in nite element analyses
G250 and G550 (minimum yield strengths of 250 and 550 MPa, to simulate the true member behaviour. Therefore the suitability
respectively). In Ranawaka and Mahendrans experimental of two shell element types, S4 and S4R5, was investigated rst
studies [14] the section geometry was chosen so that local using preliminary analyses. Element type S4 is a fully integrated,
buckling is not critical while the specimen length was chosen to general purpose, nite membrane strain shell element that allows
eliminate any global buckling effects. They showed that their test for transverse shear. The S4R5 element has one integration
specimens with xed ends failed by pure distortional buckling location per element while the S4 element type has four
under axial compression (see Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the nominal integration locations per element. The ultimate failure load and
ARTICLE IN PRESS
336 T. Ranawaka, M. Mahendran / Thin-Walled Structures 48 (2010) 334344
Table 2
Average measured Type 2 geometric imperfections of Types A and B specimens.
Table 4
Elasticity modulus at ambient temperature and reduction factors for elevated
temperatures (from [15]).
n
Elasticity Modulus (EM) is in GPa.
Table 3
Yield strengths at ambient temperature and reduction factors for elevated
Member length L
L/2
temperatures (from [15]).
Rigid top or
Steels 0.60 mm 0.80 mm 0.95 mm Bottom end plate
n
ZT 3:05 107 T 3 0:0005T 2 0:2615T 62:653 203 C r T r 8003 C
Yield strengths (YS) in MPa were determined based on 0.2% proof stress method.
7a
For G250 steel
Fig. 9. Loading and boundary conditions used in the nite element model.
0
-5 -4.5 -4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0
Fig. 12. Comparison of experimental and FEA load-deection curves for 0.8 mm
Axial compression load (kN)
30
FEA G550 Type A Specimen at 500 1C. (a) Axial shortening curves and (b) out-of-plane
25 deection curves.
Test
20
experiments. It proves that there is very good agreement with
15 experimental results at all the temperatures in the range of 20
800 1C. This good agreement is attributed to the use of accurate
10
mechanical properties and associated stressstrain characteristics
5 at elevated temperatures in FEA. Since there is good agreement in
terms of ultimate loads, load-deection curves and buckling and
0 failure modes, the developed nite element model was used in
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
further investigations on the distortional buckling behaviour of
Axial shortening (mm)
light gauge cold-formed steel members.
35
4. Finite element analyses investigating the effects of
Axial compression load (kN)
30 important parameters
25
This section presents the details and results of a series of nite
20 element analyses undertaken to investigate the effects of some
Test important parameters on distortional buckling of cold-formed
15 FEA
steel compression members.
10
4.1. Distortional buckling modes
5
Table 6
0.9 Comparison of ultimate loads from experiments and FEA for Type B specimens.
0.7
20 200 350 500 650 800
0.6
FEA
G550-0.6-B Ave. Exp. 24.10 20.87 18.71 10.05 3.19 1.04
0.5
FEA 24.80 20.55 18.85 10.05 3.54 1.11
0.4 Exp./FEA 0.972 1.016 0.993 1.000 0.918 0.937
0.3
Test G250-0.6-B Ave. Exp. 15.66 14.63 9.12 5.87 2.48 0.86
0.2 FEA FEA 15.75 14.05 8.30 5.60 2.42 0.88
0.1 Exp./FEA 0.994 1,041 1.077 1.006 1.024 0.977
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 G550-0.8-B Ave. Exp. 39.59 32.92 28.40 14.69 4.38 1.51
Axial shortening (mm) FEA 39.65 32.60 28.25 14.95 4.73 1.56
Exp./FEA 0.998 1.010 1.005 0.982 0.950 0.968
1
G250-0.8-B Ave. Exp. 25.95 23.07 14.50 8.46 4.08 1.43
0.9
Fig. 13. Comparison of experimental and FEA load-deection curves for 0.6 mm specimens. Experimental study showed that all three buckling
G550 Type A Specimen at 800 1C. (a) Axial shortening curves and (b) Out of
modes occurred when tests were repeated ([14]. The FEA
deection curves.
was also able to simulate all three failure modes and conrmed
that they occurred depending on the shape of initial geometric
imperfections.
The inuence of geometric imperfections was further studied
Table 5 by changing their direction and magnitude. As an example, when
Comparison of ultimate loads from experiments and FEA for Type A specimens.
tests were repeated, all three types of buckling mode occurred at
Specimen Ultimate load Temperature (1C) 500 1C for 0.95 mm G550 Type A specimen. However, the
difference in their ultimate loads was negligible. This was
20 200 350 500 650 800 simulated in FEA, and the ultimate load results are compared
with experimental results in Table 7. Table 7 results also conrm
G550-0.6-A Ave. Exp. 19.68 15.20 13.57 6.95 2.37 0.68
FEA 19.75 16.05 14.60 7.20 2.57 0.76
that the difference between the ultimate loads corresponding to
Exp/FEA 0.999 0.956 0.951 0.994 0.991 0.895 these three modes was negligible. It can be stated that geometric
imperfection shape of the specimen govern the failure mode and
G250-0.6-A Ave. exp. 12.84 9.30 5.89 3.83 1.91 0.61
hence the rst elastic buckling mode may not be critical in all the
FEA 12.45 9.45 5.55 3.61 1.88 0.64 cases.
Exp./FEA 1.031 0.984 1.009 1.057 1.014 0.953
G550-0.8-A Ave. Exp. 31.09 27.19 23.74 12.90 4.24 1.73 4.2. Effect of geometric imperfections
FEA 31.70 26.95 23.60 12.65 4.16 1.78
Exp./FEA 0.981 1.009 1.006 1.020 1.020 0.972 The same test specimen considered in the last section,
0.95 mm G550 Type A specimen was considered here to study
G250-0.8-A Ave. Exp. 20.36 17.28 10.23 7.12 3.18 1.36 the effect of geometric imperfections. As mentioned earlier,
FEA 20.25 17.65 9.75 7.10 3.11 1.32 changing the imperfection direction produced the three distor-
Exp./FEA 1.005 0.979 1.050 1.003 1.025 1.030
tional modes in FEA. The geometric imperfection magnitude
was also varied from 1.9 to 1.9 mm ie. 2t to +2t at 0.25t
G550-0.95-A Ave. Exp. 42.88 37.55 30.91 19.52 4.52 1.80 intervals. The residual stresses were not applied in this case. This
FEA 42.50 37.00 30.35 19.80 4.33 1.89 study was undertaken at two different temperatures of 20 and
Exp./FEA 1.009 1.015 1.018 0.986 1.044 0.952
500 1C so that the inuence of geometric imperfections can be
observed with varying temperatures. Two distortional buckling
G250-0.95-A Ave. Exp. 31.43 25.17 17.40 10.38 4.98 1.47 modes (both anges moving inwards and outwards) were
FEA 31.65 25.20 15.50 9.75 4.70 1.56
considered in this study.
Exp./FEA 0.993 0.999 1.090 1.063 1.045 0.942
Fig. 15 shows that there is a considerable inuence of initial
Note: Average experimental load was based on the results from two or three tests. geometric imperfection magnitudes on the ultimate load.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
342 T. Ranawaka, M. Mahendran / Thin-Walled Structures 48 (2010) 334344
Fig. 14. Comparison of other distortional failure modes from experiments and FEA. (a) Both anges moving inward. (b) One ange moving outward while other one moving
inward.
Table 7 rapidly with increasing large imperfections (see Fig. 15). For
Experimental and FEA results of 0.95 mm G550 Type A specimens. example, the ultimate load reduced by 20% when the imperfection
magnitude was increased from zero to 0.25t at 20 1C while there
Failure mode Ultimate load (kN)
was another 10% reduction when it was increased to 2t. Therefore
Experiments FEA it is important that appropriate geometric imperfection
magnitudes are included in nite element analyses in order to
Both anges moving in 20.40 18.85 determine the ultimate loads of cold-formed steel compression
Both anges moving out 19.41 19.35
Flanges moving in and out 19.63 19.80
members accurately.
Table 8
Mechanical property reduction factors for G250 and G550 steels.
Temp(oC) Outinen [10]2.0 mm S350 Chen, Young [3]1.0 mm G550 Mecozzi, Zhao [25]0.6 mm S280 ECS [24] Cold-formed steels
fy E fy E fy E fy E
Table 9 mechanical properties from Refs. [3,10] and [15] were used in
Effect of mechanical properties on the ultimate loads of high strength steel the nite element analyses of 0.95 mm G250 and G550 steel
columns.
Types A and B columns (Table 1).
Temp Types A & B Ultimate load (kN) Exp./ Exp./ Tables 9 and 10 and Fig. 16(a)(d) compare the experimental
(1C) specimens FEA FEAChen results with FEA results based on the mechanical properties
Exp. FEA FEAChen obtained from this research [15] and Refs. [3,10]. According to
these tables and gures, the inuence of mechanical properties at
20 G550-0.95-20-A 42.88 42.50 42.50 1.009 1.009
200 G550-0.95-200-A 37.55 37.00 39.95 1.015 0.940
elevated temperatures on the distortional buckling failure load is
350 G550-0.95-350-A 30.91 30.35 37.30 1.018 0.829 signicant. The results obtained from Chen and Youngs and
500 G550-0.95-500-A 19.81 19.80 9.75 1.001 2.032 Outinens mechanical properties show a considerable variation
650 G550-0.95-650-A 4.52 4.33 4.30 1.044 1.051 from some of the experimental results obtained in this research
800 G550-0.95-800-A 1.80 1.89 1.84 0.952 0.978
(350 and 500 1C). However, the ultimate loads obtained based on
20 G550-0.95-20-B 53.58 55.00 55.00 0.974 0.974
200 G550-0.95-200-B 46.95 47.60 53.00 0.986 0.886 the mechanical properties determined in this research show a
350 G550-0.95-350-B 39.04 38.35 48.45 1.018 0.806 good agreement with the experimental results. The reduc-
500 G550-0.95-500-B 21.90 22.50 11.25 0.973 1.947 tion factors recommended by ECS [24] are similar to those of
650 G550-0.95-650-B 5.02 5.00 4.98 1.004 1.008 Outinen [6] whereas Mecozzi and Zhaos reduction factors [25]
800 G550-0.95-800-B 1.95 2.05 2.13 0.951 0.915
are different to those of Ranawaka and Mahendran [15] for low
strength steels. This implies that the currently available
Mean 0.996 1.115 mechanical property reduction factors for elevated temperatures
COV 0.029 0.373
are not accurate for light gauge cold-formed steels used in
Australia. It also conrms the importance of using accurate
Table 10 mechanical properties in the analysis and design of cold-formed
Effect of mechanical properties on the ultimate loads of low strength steel steel compression members subject to re conditions.
columns.
Ranawaka and Mahendran [15] presented predictive equations
Temp Types A & B Ultimate load (kN) Exp./ Exp./ for the determination of both yield strength and elasticity
(1C) specimens FEA FEAOutinen modulus at elevated temperatures and a suitable stressstrain
Exp. FEA FEAOutinen model for the light gauge cold-formed steels used in Australia.
They can be used to accurately simulate the re performance of
20 G250-0.95-20-A 31.43 31.65 31.65 0.993 0.993
200 G250-0.95-200-A 25.17 25.20 26.10 0.999 0.964
cold-formed steel members made of these steels. Further research
350 G250-0.95-350-A 17.40 15.50 23.20 1.123 0.750 is needed for thin cold-formed steels and columns used in other
500 G250-0.95-500-A 10.38 9.75 17.35 1.065 0.598 countries. This can then lead to the development of suitable
650 G250-0.95-650-A 4.98 4.70 6.90 1.060 0.722 generalised material models that can be used safely in the re
800 G250-0.95-800-A 1.47 1.56 2.73 0.942 0.538
safety design of light gauge cold-formed steel members.
20 G250-.0.95-20-B 37.45 35.95 35.95 1.042 1.042
200 G250-0.95-200-B 28.40 29.10 29.65 0.976 0.958
350 G250-0.95-350-B 19.67 18.35 27.55 1.072 0.714
500 G250-0.95-500-B 11.74 11.45 19.80 1.025 0.593 5. Conclusions
650 G250-0.95-650-B 5.36 5.40 7.95 0.993 0.674
800 G250-0.95-800-B 1.94 1.93 3.33 1.005 0.583
This paper has described the development of a nite element
model capable of simulating the distortional buckling behaviour
Mean 1.024 0.761 of light gauge cold-formed steel compression members at
COV 0.049 0.238
ambient and elevated temperatures. The developed shell nite
element models included accurate mechanical properties and
stressstrain characteristics of steels, initial geometric imperfec-
differences in the recommended reduction factors, which are tions and residual stresses as a function of temperatures in
mostly due to the differences in steels used. However, it is useful the range of 20800 1C. They were able to simulate the failure
to investigate the effect of mechanical properties on the modes, load-deection curves and ultimate loads of 72 cold-
distortional buckling behaviour of cold-formed steel columns at formed steel compression members tested at temperatures in the
elevated temperatures. Outinen [10] results are for 2 mm S350 range of 20800 1C by Ranawaka and Mahendran [14]. The
steels, but were also considered suitable for 0.95 mm G250 steels validated nite element model was used to investigate the effect
whereas Chen and Youngs [3] results for 1 mm G550 steels were of different types of distortional buckling mode, initial geometric
considered suitable for 0.95 mm G550 steels. Therefore the imperfections, residual stresses and mechanical properties. The
ARTICLE IN PRESS
344 T. Ranawaka, M. Mahendran / Thin-Walled Structures 48 (2010) 334344
50 60
45
Exp 50 Exp
Ultimate load (kN) 40
35 40
30 35
Exp Exp
Ultimate load (kN)
Fig. 16. Effect of mechanical properties on ultimate loads. (a) 0.95 mm G550 Type A specimen (b) 0.95 mm G550 Type B specimen, (c) 0.95 mm G250 Type A specimen and
(d) 0.95 mm G250 Type B specimen.
results have demonstrated the importance of using accurate [12] Hancock GJ. In: Design of cold-formed steel structures, 3rd ed.. Sydney, NSW,
mechanical properties at elevated temperatures in the re safety Australia: Australian Institute of Steel Construction; 1998.
[13] Lee J. Local buckling behaviour and design of cold-formed steel compression
design of cold-formed steel compression members. members at elevated temperatures, Ph.D. Thesis, Brisbane, Australia:
Queensland University of Technology;2004.
[14] Ranawaka T, Mahendran M. Distortional buckling tests of light gauge cold-
References formed steel compression members at elevated temperatures. Journal of
Constructional Steel Research 2009;65:24959.
[15] Ranawaka T, Mahendran M. Experimental study of the mechanical properties
[1] Ala-Outinen M, Myllymaki J. (1995) The local buckling of RHS members at of light gauge cold-formed steels at elevated temperatures. Fire Safety
elevated temperatures, VTT Research notes 1672, Technical Research Centre Journal 2009;44:21929.
of Finland, Espoo. [16] Camotim D, Silvestre N, Dinis PB. Numerical analysis of cold-formed steel
[2] Chen J, Young B. Mechanical properties of cold-formed steel at elevated members. Journal of Steel Structures 2005:6378.
temperatures. Proceeding of Seventeenth International Speciality Conference [17] Dubina D, Ungureanu V. Effect of imperfections on numerical simulation of
on Cold-formed Steel Structures. Orlando, Florida, USA: University of instability behaviour of cold-formed steel members. Thin-Walled Structures
Missouri-Rolla; 2004. p. 437465. 2002;40(3):23962.
[3] Chen J, Young B. Experimental investigation of cold-formed steel material at [18] Schafer BW, Pekoz T. Computational modelling of cold-formed steel:
elevated temperatures. Thin-Walled Structures 2007;45(1):96110. characterising geometric imperfections and residual stresses. Journal of
[4] Chen J, Young B. Stress-strain curves for stainless steel at elevated Constructional Steel Research 1998;47:193210.
temperatures. Engineering Structures 2006:28(2):22939. [19] Sivakumaran KS, Rahman NA. A nite element analysis model for the
[5] Feng M, Wang YC, Davies JM. Structural behaviour of cold-formed thin- behaviour of cold-formed steel members. Thin-walled Structures 1998;31:
walled short steel channel columns at elevated temperatures, part 1: 30524.
experiments. Thin-Walled Structures 2003;41(6):54370. [20] Young B, Yan J. Finite element analysis of cold-formed channel columns.
[6] Feng M, Wang YC, Davies JM. Structural behaviour of cold-formed thin-walled Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Specialty Conference on Cold-
short steel channel columns at elevated temperatures. part 2: design calcula- Formed Steel Structures. USA: Missouri; 2000. p. 281305.
tions and numerical analysis. Thin-Walled Structures 2003;41(6):57194. [21] Walker AC. In: Design and analysis of Cold-Formed Section. New York, USA:
[7] Feng M, Wang YC, Davies JM. Axial strength of cold-formed thin-walled Halsted Press; 1975.
steel channels under non-uniform temperatures in re. Fire Safety Journal [22] Ranawaka T. Distortional buckling behaviour of cold-formed steel compres-
2003;38:679707. sion members at elevated temperatures. Ph.D. Thesis, Brisbane, Australia:
[8] Feng M, Wang YC, Davies JM. A numerical imperfection sensitivity study of Queensland University of Technology; 2006.
cold-formed thin-walled tabular steel columns at uniform elevated tempera- [23] Young B, Rasmussen KJR. Behaviour of cold-formed singly symmetric
tures. Thin-Walled Structures 2004;42:53355. columns. Thin-Walled Structures 1999;33(2):83102.
[9] Kaitila O. Imperfection sensitivity analysis of lipped channel columns at high [24] European Committee for Standardization (ECS), (2005) Eurocode 3: design
temperatures. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2002;58(3):33351. of steel structures Part 1.2: general rules structural re design, Brussels,
[10] Outinen J. Mechanical properties of structural steels at elevated tempera- Belgium.
tures. Licentiate Thesis. Finland: Helsinki University of Technology; 1999. [25] Mecozzi E, Zhao B. Development of stress-strain relationships of lightweight
[11] Ranby A. Structural re design of thin-walled steel sections. Journal of steel at elevated temperatures. In: Proceedings of the Eurosteel Conference,
Constructional Steel Research 1998;46(13):3034. Volume C, pp. 5.1-415.1-49, 2005.