Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
Various methods of innovative teaching may be implemented in the teaching and learning activities to
simulate an environment where students are encouraged to be proactive. These innovative methods
may be in the form of Project Based Learning (PBL), Project Oriented Problem Based Learning (POPBL),
Active Learning (AL), Cooperative Learning (CL), Independent Learning (IL) and others.
Previous methods of teaching laboratory courses are basically in the form of fully guided assignment.
The methods are described as prescriptive or traditional methods. However these methods are now no
longer adequate within the context of outcome based learning environments (1). It could not provide the
platform where students are given opportunities to explore their own simulation and design their own
experimental works.
Thus the need for an open ended laboratory is emphasized in enhancing independent learning and
inculcating creativity and innovation of students. They are required to determine the objectives and
scope, identifying apparatus needed and preparing the methodology, running the experiment and finally
submitting the technical report. Through this process students must understand the principles of
technical reasoning and the experimental design (3).
This brief paper looks at the practicality of implementing the open ended laboratory activities at
different levels of education for a four year engineering degree programme and how it was
implemented at the Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Pulau Pinang.
Level of Openness
Amongst the many papers (1, 4) which the author managed to review stated that fully open ended
laboratory activities should be introduced in the third year of the four year degree programme.
However, syllabi of most engineering programme contain laboratory courses spanning throughout the
four year programme. Thus it is impractical to introduce the open ended laboratory activities for all
laboratory courses from Year 1 to Year 4. The conduct of laboratory activities should be carried out at
different levels of openness throughout the period of study.
The concept of different level of openness was discussed by many authors. In most discussion the area
of concern is categorized as problem, ways and means and answers. Kilinc, A., 2005 (5) described the
level of openness as shown in Table 1 below based on the one proposed by Hegarty-Hazel (1986). The
ways and means are split into two different elements as apparatus and procedures respectively.
McComas (1997) (6) presented the level of openness as envisaged by Schwab-Herron as in Table 2 below.
Four levels were identified and three elements to be addressed were categorized.
Petropol-Serb (2011) (3) categorized the elements to be addressed in the open ended laboratory
activities as the experimental set-up, the experimental design and data analysis and report. Asanovic
(2009, 2012) (7, 8) referred to the elements as a directed portion and an open ended portion.
To simplify the matter it is suggested that there should be four (4) levels of openness, namely Levels 0-3,
and three categories of element to be incorporated into the laboratory manual, namely problem, ways
and means and answers. The scientific enquiry rubric, as given by Fay, 2009, for the levels of openness
are summarized and described as in Table 3 below by the University of New South Wales, Australia (9).
Establishing the level of independence and autonomy expected of students to carry out an
assessment task
Level of
Description
Enquiry
The problem, procedure and methods for achieving solutions are provided to the student.
0
The student performs the experiment and verifies the results with the manual
The problem and procedure are provided to the student. The student interprets the data
1
in order to propose viable solutions
The problem is provided to the student. The student develops a procedure for
2 investigating the problem, decides what data to gather, and interprets the data in order
to propose viable solutions
A raw phenomenon is provided to the student. The student chooses the problem to
3 explore, develops a procedure for investigating the problem, decides what data to gather,
and interprets the data in order to propose viable solutions
Implementation of the laboratory activities at the Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM, Pulau Pinang was
progressively introduced, monitored, reviewed and streamlined since the last accreditation exercise by
EAC in 2008. New guidelines were introduced to facilitate the teaching and learning activities to benefit
not only the students but new lecturers taking the courses. Manual preparation for each laboratory
activities would include the elements as shown in Table 4. The preamble to the laboratory manual
should include introduction, objectives and learning outcomes. The lecturers may also include basic
theoretical information as and when necessary.
Suggested percentage breakdown of laboratory activity based on the level of openness and year of
study is shown in Table 5. However, this is not a rigid guideline and respective course lecturers may
adopt their own breakdown with reasons. Table 5 could be used by respective laboratory course
lecturers as a guide in designing the breakdown of laboratory activities according to the year of study. At
least one open ended laboratory activity is incorporated in all laboratory courses. An open ended real
life problem is given which would require the conduct of three to four laboratory experiments carried
out in succession over a period of 3-4 weeks.
The table also shows the practice of fully open ended laboratory activities for a particular course is best
example in the course Final Year Projects I & II for those students involved in projects of investigative in
nature.
Table 5 : Suggested Percentage Breakdown based on Level of Openness and Year of Study
Conclusion
It is hope that the teaching of laboratory courses progressively from prescriptive to investigative in
nature will eventually mould the students to be better engineers in the future. It should be noted that
well-prepared laboratory manuals based on the different levels of openness alone could never achieve
the desired objectives without due attention and proper assessment of the activities by respective
course lecturers/laboratory facilitators. It is also anticipated that this nature of activities would enable
students to be better prepared in taking final year projects of investigative nature in the fourth year.
References
1 Abd Rahman, N., et al., 2011. Comparative Study between Open Ended Laboratory and
Traditional Laboratory
2 Engineering Acreditation Manual 2012, Board of Engineers (BEM), Malaysia
3 Petropol-Serb, G. D., et al., 2011. Open Ended Laboratory Method Applied in the Conception of
a Test Bench to Simulate a Diesel-Electric Transmission
4 Kofli, N. T., et al, 2012. Open Ended Laboratory Assignment As Enhancing Generic Skills
Amongst Engineering Students.
5 Kilinc, A., 2005. The Opinions of Turkish High School Pupils on Inquiry Based Laboratory
Activities
6 McComas, W.E, 1997. The nature of the laboratory experience: a guide for describing,
classifying and enhancing hands-on activities. CSTA Journal 6-9.
7 Asanovic, K., Beamer, S., 2009. C152 Laboratory Exercise 6
8 Asanovic, K., Celio, C., 2012. C152 Laboratory Exercise 1
9 UNSW, Australia. Assessment Toolkit. Assessing Laboratory Learning
10 Assessment Rubrics for Laboratory Courses, Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM, Malaysia
LEVEL 1
CATEGORY MANUAL
DESCRIPTION
FOR LEVELS CONTENT
Suspended solids (particularly colloids) are often removed from water by
chemical coagulation and flocculation. Colloidal particles carry a small
electrostatic charge that keeps them in suspension. Coagulation is the
addition of chemicals to neutralize the effect of colloidal charges and allow
INTRODUCTION
aggregation of particles. Following coagulation the suspension is stirred
gently to promote particle collision and agglomeration in a process termed
flocculation.
PREAMBLE To determine the optimum alum dose and pH for suspended solids removal
OBJECTIVES from water using Jar test.
LEVEL 1
Treatment of water in the water treatment plant will cost high if the amount
of alum is highly used. Therefore it is important to determine the optimum
dosage of alum and the optimum pH for the optimum coagulation and
PROBLEM
PROBLEM flocculation process. Each group need to prepare samples of water according
STATEMENT
to the procedure and determine the optimum pH and dosage for the
coagulation and flocculation process.
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 2
Apparatus
The group must identify the availability of the chosen apparatus in the lab
before the right procedures can be identified.
PROCEDURES
Procedures
(Refer to Standard
The group is required to search for the relevant procedure to carry out the test
WAYS & Methods for the
based on the available apparatus in your laboratory. The document must be
MEANS Examination of
made ready for verification by the instructor during the laboratory activity.
Water and
Wastewater) Data Acquisition
All data collected and observed during the test must be tabulate in proper
format for easy verification and presentation of the technical report
LEVEL 3
Water quality data were used to determine the water quality status whether
the collected samples are clean, slightly polluted or polluted based on Water
Quality Index (WQI) and to classify the source of water in Class I, II, III, IV
or V based on Interim National Water Quality Standards for Malaysia
PROBLEM
PROBLEM (INWQS). Each group needs to collect 2 samples of surface water from
STATEMENT
different locations. Determine the appropriate parameters of the water quality
within 4 laboratory sessions to solve the problem given. Discuss and
conclude the findings in a proper report.
PROCEDURES Refer to Water Quality Index (WQI) and Interim National Water Quality
(Refer to Standard Standards for Malaysia (INWQS)
Methods for the Brief procedure of work to be written by each group
WAYS & Examination of
MEANS Water and
Wastewater)
DATA Format for data acquisition to be prepared by the group
ACQUISITION
ANALYSIS & Technical data, analysis, and report to be presented by each group.
ANSWERS
CONCLUSION