Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Developed By Shayla
Students will learn about topics and situations within governance that will benefit them in the future. This unit will engage in them
qualities of Life Long Learners as they will become aware of the ways that the information they learn about is extremely relevance in
their lives. As students interact with the material they will be studying they will learn how important it is to ask questions of their
government and of the governing bodies. These questions will demonstrate to them how important it is for students to continue to ask
questions and learn as much as they can when they consider these topics in the future.
Building Engaged citizens is key to this unit as it strives to uncover the realities of Governance and power within our society. As
students make moral decisions they will grow as citizens who are passionate, as individuals who want to evoke change for the good of
the people in their society. By learning about what they believe and the way that communities can stand together to have their needs
met, students will come to see they have a role to play in society. As students come to recognize their role and voice in society as
important they will become engaged citizens who are well informed and able to understand both sides of conflict in governance, while
also asserting their voice in a way that helps society.
Cross curricular Competencies
How will this unit promote the CCC?
Develop Thinking- embedded within this unit plan students will take part in dialectic thinking, and moral testing. This Unit will help
students develop their skills as out lined within the Saskatchewan Social Studies 30: Canadian Studies curriculum guide. Dialectic
thinking is an important skill that students will take with them into society as the nature of a pluralistic society, such as Canada, is
found in the many divisions that are present. In learning these skills students will be prepared for evaluating arguments and
determining the best outcome in the future as members of society. Students will also learn how to evaluate information as a part of
developing thinking, and they will be more equip to choose from the various points of view while drawing distinctions between
legitimate knowledge and propaganda.
DSR
Learning Outcomes
What relevant goals will this unit address?
(must come from curriculum; include the designations e.g. IN2.1)
PA30.3Assesshowinvolvedthegovernmentshouldbeinthelivesofitscitizens(Medicare,immigration,socialpolicies)
DR30.4AnalyzehowcentralCanadasdecisionmakingeffecteditsrelationshipwithotherpartsofCanada
DR30.1Analyzedecisionmakingmodelsthatinvolvedebateandconsensusfortheirstrengthsandweakness.
DR30.2Discussandevaluatedifferentviewpoints,tomakeatentativejudgmentorhowanissuemaycausecontroversy.
DR30.3AssesshowhistoricaleventsinCanadahaveaffectedthepresentCanadianidentity
* outcomes taken from http://curriculum.nesd.ca/Non-Renewed-Curricula/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/Non-
Renewed-Curricula/History-Supports/History%2030/History%2030%20Outcomes.docx&action=default
Knowledge: Skills
What knowledge will student acquire as a result of this unit? This What skills will students acquire as a result of this unit? List the
content knowledge may come from the indicators, or might also skills and/or behaviours that students will be able to exhibit as a
address pre-requisite knowledge that students will need for this result of their work in this unit. These will come from the
unit. indicators.
Students will know... Students will be able to
- Students will know how to use dialectic thinking and evaluation to - students will be able to exercise dialectic thinking and moral
gain insight into the way that Canadas governance system works testing to evaluate concepts and conflicts within society
- students will know that in Canada the Governance models and - Students will be able to differentiate between legitimate
methods are a result of the constitutional act in (1867) perspectives, and propaganda.
- students will know the way that the constitution informs provincial - students will be able to understand how Canadas past and
rights within Canada. constitution influences governance in Canada
- Students will know how to use moral reasoning to come to - students will be able to make moral test and decisions based
conclusions from moments of conflict and tension in Canadian on dialectic thinking/reasoning.
society.
- Students will understand the governing system in Canada and how
power is divided within it.
Students will split into 5 groups and will participate in a jeopardy game. https://jeopardylabs.com/play/governance-in-canada-ch-1-5-
review Their competitive natures will enhance this activity and there will be a prize for the winning team. All of the questions in the
jeopardy game will be based around governance, rights, laws and government. This will serve as a formative assessment tool for me to
see what the students already know about these topics. After the jeopardy activity students will do a quick right responding to an
essential question from the Unit: Why do we need governance in Canada?
What events will help students experience and explore the enduring understandings and essential questions in the unit?
How will you equip them with needed skills and knowledge?
# Lesson Title Lesson Activities CCCs Resources
1 Culture and DT - Zaretta Hammonds book
Governance? ~15 minutes hook activity: How does understanding your culture help you Culturally Responsive Teaching
Do these understand Governance students will do an activity to understand their culture and The Brain.
things go out of Zaretta Hammonds book Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain. - Laptops/ access to a computer
together? In this lesson the teacher will address her culture as a white European settler lab
and how that affects her views on governance. This is an important exercise to - Sticky notes
this lesson do with the class before we start doing the Unit so that students can understand - Long role of white paper
might be themselves and why the think what they think about governance. - Performance task handout
broken up ~5 mins- free writing to see how students understand their own culture- to be - www.lop.parl.gc.ca
over two handed in for Formative assessment
days if ~ 25 mins: student led teaching- students make notes about what they learn
students about from this timeline website
need more http://www.lop.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/SenatorEugeneForsey/time_travel/ind
time to ex-e.html and students will create a timeline of how Canadas Government
work on the came to be on a long poster board that will hang in the classroom as point of
timeline reference throughout the course. The timeline will be assigned to groups and the
students will make groups to work on various parts and times within the
timeline.
~15 mins introduce final project performance task and set date for first
check-in
~ 5 mins recap and re-address the students free writing by clarifying the
importance of understanding our own cultures as we learn about Governance in
Canada to help everyone remain open to different perspectives.
Outcome: PA 30.3 Assess how involved the government should be in the lives of
its citizens (Medicare, immigration, social policies)
Outcome: DR 30.3 Assess how historical events in Canada have affected the
present Canadian identity
6 A Closer look ~10 mins- Democracy game with students: the state is set up, teacher is the DT; - Game scenarios
at Democracy elected leader. Students are the citizens who make their needs known to the DSR
in Canada. elected leader. Leader provides for the needs unequally, but constantly reminds
the students they are in a democratic state where things are equal. At the end of
the activity have students to a quick write outlining how they felt doing the
activity.
~10 Review of Democracy Ideology
- Do you Canada a truly democratic state?
~25 mins Disrupting achieved Democracy in Canada simulation
Guide Q: How is Canada failing to be a true democratic state?
~5 mins what have you learnt? Have students write down 3 things they have
learned from the lesson, 2 things they feel that they still do not understand
about democracy and 1 question they might have democracy in Canada.
Outcome: DR 30.3 Assess how historical events in Canada have affected the
present Canadian identity
7 Aboriginal ~10 mins If you could rule yourself- what would you do? Brainstorm with a DT - Elder
Governance partner - Tobacco
~ 20 mins- show videos Viewing for meaning - Questions from the
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlA0NNCSKmc videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-MgYKvIWPs - Exit Slip
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-MgYKvIWPs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJaKGXOTe_g
~15 mins Students answer questions about Aboriginal Governance from the
videos.
~35 mins invite an elder to speak with the class about treaties and Aboriginal
Governance and the historical conflict between Aboriginal Governance and
European/Canadian modes of Governance.
~ 5 mins- Exit slip- How does the Aboriginal ideology of Governance compare
with European/Canadian Governance? Make two observations and make one
criticism of European Governance considering what you have learnt today.
Essential Question: - How is power Distributed?
Outcome: DR 30.4 Analyze how central Canadas decision making effected its
relationship with other parts of Canada; PA 30.3 Assess how involved the
government should be in the lives of its citizens (Medicare, immigration, social
policies)
9 Aboriginal ~ 3 mins Hook question: What creates conflict discussion DT - computer lab access/
Governance ~ 30 mins- student research for debate on these issues in governance laptops for research
vs. Student Conflict or power and wealth
Eurocentric Culture conflict
ideology of Differing political customs
Governance ~ 27 mins debate time
11 Performance - Students will create a project that displays their understanding of a topic that DT; - Computers, printers
Task/ Work has created a governing conflict in society today. Students will be asked to DSR - handout
period research and use dialectic thinking to understand a current controversy and -rubric
create something that displays their stance on the subject.
Students will have the whole period to work on creating their project or any
research that they need to do to complete the task. AT the end of the day
teacher will assess to see if students need another work period, or if
presentations should begin the next class. Teacher will ask the students at the
end of class time to return to the class and raise their hand if they need more
time, or if they would be ready to present tomorrow. IF students are ready, a
second work period would not be necessary.
12 Work period Second work period for students who still need time on their project. If students - Computers, printers
are finished their projects they will have this class time to work on their personal - handout
reflections of learning in their journals. -rubric
13 Presentations Students will have the whole period to do their presentation, if another period is DSR; - Rubric
required we will take another period. Students who have opted to do DT - multi-media implements
presentations can use up to 6-8 minutes. If others have created videos or other (projector, computer, smart
media presentations, they will be viewed now as well. board, or screen)
All Outcomes
One way I might encourage students who need a challenge in this assignment
is to have them only look at primary sources and consider 2 secondary
documents if their research topic allows for that. In this way students will get
less of an overview and more of a personal experience from which they must
make inferences and connections on their own. As they read they will be
analyzing and evaluating what is being said and left unsaid in these documents.
This type of research will have a greater effect then on the product of what they
create.
Another way I might do this is by personally being flexible to see where the
student wants to take his or her project and to the great length they want to go
with it.
Instructional Approaches: Yes, throughout this unit I use several different instructional strategies. The
Do I use a variety of teacher directed and student strategies used in the unit are as followed:
centered instructional approaches? Direct Instruction: explicit teaching, concept mapping, concept formation, and
drill and practice.
Indirect Instruction: reading or viewing for meaning, and case studies
Interactive instruction: debate, brainstorming, discussion, and groups
Independent instruction: research and journaling
Experiential instruction: simulation
From: Wiggins, Grant and J. McTighe. (1998). Understanding by Design, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, ISBN # 0-87120-
313-8 (pbk)
Appendix
Part A: Rubric for Performance Task
Part B: Performance Task assignment sheet and scaffolding directions
Part C: Lesson plans
1) First lesson plan
2) Second plan with CRT
Part D: Write up and reflection
PART A
Performance Task Rubric:
Knowledge/ Skills Poor (1) Average (2) Proficient (3) Exceptional (4)
Demonstrates an Students disregard Students attempt to Students attempt to Students address each essential
understanding of essential questions in understand a few of address essential question in a through manner.
essential questions their project and do not the essential questions and offer
shown throughout mention them in their questions from the responses to them.
the unit. understanding. unit.
Depth of Moral Student portrays Student attempts to The students work and Students work and research displays
Reasoning and deliberate bias without represent all sides of research displays full consideration of all perspectives
Dialectic Reasoning considering another the perspective in thoughtful consideration in conflict. The students work fully
perspective. order to gain deeper of all perspectives represents their moral decision and
understanding in the however the moral is rooted in the research that was
research, however decision does not tie done for the assignment. Their
favors one side with completely to the dialectic reasoning is strong and is
bias. research that was done also used to drive the depth of the
for the project. Their moral stance the student takes.
dialectic reasoning is
strengthening and
informs the depth of the
moral stance the student
takes.
Demonstrates
understanding based
on the following
outcomes of the unit.
The student does not The student attempts The student portrays an The students project portrays a deep
DR30.4 Analyze consider cause-effect to include examples understanding of cause- understanding of cause- effect
how central relationships and does of cause-effect effect relationships and relationships and they have
Canadas decision not have any examples relationships in provides a few well extensive, thought out examples
making effected its or considerations of Canada but does not thought out examples through-out their project
relationship with such. provide any
other parts of examples.
Canada.
Student understands
IN 30.1 Analyze how Student does not have worldview and is Student understands Student has a clear understanding
worldview impacts a basic understanding beginning to their person worldview about their personal world view and
the ways a society of worldview and does articulate and but does not clearly what shapes them and how it
develops a not acknowledge their understand their understand how their changes the way they see society.
relationship with own worldview or how personal world view lives and view of society Their work shows that they are also
land and people. worldview shape however does not is shaped by it. Their aware and consider how worldview
society. mention how that work shows they are has influenced society.
shapes their becoming aware of how
understanding of worldview has influenced
society. They make society.
attempts to greater
societal worldviews
but do not draw any
conclusive
relationships.
Student shows a deep
PA 30.3 Assess how Student does not Student considers Students show an understanding and assessment of
involved the consider or understand but does not understanding and are government involvement and
government should the ways in which understand or assess beginning to assess the considers the cause-effect
be in the lives of its government should be the way that government is relationship of government
citizens (Medicare, involved in the lives of government/citizen involved in the lives of its involvement.
immigration, social citizens. relationship. They do citizens. The cause-effect
policies) consider the cause- relationship is considered
effect relationship but is not fully
but it is not developed.
expanded upon, only
stated.
DR 30.2 Discuss Student does not Student can consider Student can evaluate Student successfully and with great
and evaluate consider different different viewpoints multiple view points and depth evaluates multiple view points
different viewpoints, viewpoints and cannot but is unable to can make a judgement in a moment of conflict and can
to make a tentative make a judgement on consider making a on a controversial topic. coherently support their perspective
judgement on how issues of controversy. judgement on a while considering the others.
an issue may cause cs controversial topic
controversy without adopting one
view or the other.
DR 30.3 Assess Student does not Student attempts to Student can assess the Student can comprehensively assess
how historical events understand that make connections to ways that Canadian the ways that Canadian Identity has
in Canada have Canadas past has had the shaping of identity has been created been created and influenced. The
affected the present any influence in Canadian identity and influenced. Student student can clearly articulate the
Canadian identity shaping Canada today. however they are not can articulate the key moment they study and
They do not address conclusive. Student moment they study and understand the implications of such
their topic of study as begins to hit towards understand the a time historically and presently. All
something that has moments in history implications of such a sides of the change/ conflict are
shaped society. Their that shape identity, time historically and clearly presented and put forth for
project does not reflect but not presently. They present deeper understanding of todays
consideration of how comprehensively. most sides of the society.
Canadas identity has They understand change/conflict and
been shaped by their their topic is of great grasp for a deeper
topic. importance, but understanding of society.
cannot connect it to
the greater changes
in society.
PART B
PART C
Cross-Curricular Competencies:
Develop Thinking- By taking part in this lesson students will develop their thinking skills by being introduced to the
dialectic thinking and reasoning process. As students are introduced to topics of conflict within Governance they will
practice understanding both sides of the conflict to help them understand the arguments more thoroughly and be able to
engage with them as they enter into society after leaving high school.
Develop Social Responsibility-This lesson and the following lessons in the unit will build upon students knowledge of the
way that social relationships are effected by governance and democracy. By taking part the dialectic thinking and
reasoning process throughout the unit, students will have to practice moral reasoning. In this lesson students, will be
introduced to how we make decisions and what effects our moral reasoning as citizens. In this way students, will gain an
understanding of the responsibility that must be shared as citizens in Canada, and they will understand that they have a
part to place in social responsibility.
Outcome(s):
DR30.4 Analyze how central Canadas decision making effected its relationship with other parts of Canada.
PGP Goals:
2.1 knowledge of Canadian History, especially in reference to Saskatchewan and Western Canada;4.1 knowledge of
Saskatchewan curriculum and policy documents and applies this understanding to plan lessons, units of study and year
plans using curriculum outcomes as outlined by the Saskatchewan Ministry of Education;
Stage 2- Assessment
Assessment FOR Learning (formative) Assess the students during the learning to help determine next steps.
Before watching the video on Governance, I will ask the students what they know about Governance. At this point in the
course Governance would have been touched on and summarized in the previous Units so I would expect them to be able
to explain that Governance is about the policies that define how a group of people makes decisions for the good of the
group.
Continue by asking students questions. Asking them if they are understanding or if there is need for clarification about
content.
White board write after the PowerPoint and video.
Thumbs up, thumbs down, thumbs in the middle
Assessment OF Learning (summative) Assess the students after learning to evaluate what they have learned.
Quick Write/ Exit Slip responding to the questions: What is Governance, and what does it do? If Governance is supposed to
do good for Canadians what needs to be taken into consideration when questions surrounding welfare arise? Do you think
Governance is doing a good job of taking care of the people in Canada?
Stage 3- Learning Plan
Adaptations/Differentiation:
- For Students with difficulty writing notes from the video or following along from the power point I would provide them with
printed off notes and slides of the same information so that they can make notes on the notes. This will allow students to
follow a long easier.
- Provide students with difficulty reading more one-on-one conferencing about what they are reading, encourage students
to read together and discuss what they are reading.
- For those with poor reading skills I could provide a summary of the brief article for them, outlining the main points
Closing of lesson:
- Students will fill out an exit slip after taking part in the pro/cons discussion on the welfare state.
Personal Reflection:
Article:
Re: Overzealous & Secretive, Dec. 13; A Broken System, Dec. 15.
The National Post should be congratulated for adding to the national conversation on the direction of child welfare in this
country. In a research project I have been leading, which looks into child protection failures, there are two uncomfortable
themes that keep arising: That the system is largely racist and focused on the economically disadvantaged. Aboriginal
people make up the largest percentage of children in care across the country. Other minority populations follow. The vast
majority of families involved in the child protection systems are also poor.
Government policies are at the root of these issues. Child protection cannot solve poverty and racism. For example, the
federal government must stop under-funding child protection on reserves. Poverty, which results in the neglect of children,
must be directly addressed by economic programs. Child protection is left as the cleanup system for large social problems
that we, as Canadians, appear unwilling to collectively resolve.
Peter W. Choate, assistant professor, Social Work, Mount Royal University, Calgary.
I was pleased to see the National Post take up the cudgels on behalf of children in need of protection. As noted in your
article, these children risk further abuse, and even death, despite being under state supervision. Another risk they face are
too many disruptions: changes of social worker, moving from home to home, changing schools as they move. Educational
success is compromised. They are at greater risk of being drawn into street life and homelessness. Family connections are
lost; they are aged out of the system too soon and end up with poorer outcomes than their contemporaries later in life.
Problems within the system are too numerous to document in a short letter, but a key issue is the failure to recognize that
decision making in this field requires an advanced set of skills. Close to 60% of workers have less than four-years
experience. Many do not even have a basic social work degree. We would not tolerate such lack of standards in the
medical world, which is analogous in that it also involves decision making that may have life and death consequences.
After a long career in this field, I advocate for change whenever I can.
Kathleen Kufeldt, adjunct professor, University of New Brunswick, Calgary.
Name_________ Date_________
EXIT SLIP: If governance is supposed to work for the good of the people, how do we
make sense of the ways that the system fails individuals? Can you think of a different
solution to meeting the needs of the people?
PowerPoint
What is Governance?
Those who make decisions within a pluralistic political culture must be chosen by a significant fraction of the population and then they
must ensure that their practices respond to the needs of those people.
Parliamentary sovereignty
One Parliament cannot make laws that will bind future parliament in any way;
All privately owned land is held as a form of delegation from the sovereign who can take it back at any time; and,
Parliament is the highest cour in the land and cannot be overridden by the courts that enforce laws.
This changed mainly because the people were unhappy because their needs were not being met which created a new form of the
sovereignty
Popular Sovereignty
Which is the belief that supreme authority within society resides with the people themselves and cannot be delegated to any other
individual or organization
Constitution
Is a body of rules and practices, written and un written according to which the people and the political institutions of a society are
governed.
Rights
Rights are those claims for recognition by individuals and groups that take precedence over the claims of other individuals or groups
that a society is duty-bound to recognize.
The charter of rights and the judiciary laws keep governments from violating rights.
Governance, specifically good governance matters today because it is necessary for giving voice to the needs of the people.
Good governance good leadership good decisions and better outcomes FOR THE PEOPLE
There are multiple challenges in our society that need to be changed for our society today.
Indigenous peoples in health, education and economic development. The gap between them and other Canadians needs to be closed.
Good governance needs to be achieved to make sure their rights are being upheld.
Governance agendas on authority and jurisdiction, institutions and government structures that support self-government are needed if
change is to happen
Governance in Cities need to change as they too have changed over time
Effective representation of diverse population, aging citizen, integrating transportation networks and climate change
These programs provide direct payments to poor individuals as well as a broad spectrum of programs
Welfare is run by the provinces which means it differs from place to place.
Originally run by the church, but the responsibility was transferred to government policy in the 1930s and 60s.
Much of the funding has been cut in the 1990s as governments become focused on reducing debt and deficit.
Lesson 2 new lesson to be marked
Lesson Plan Title: Culture and Governance? Do these things go together?
Date: N/A
Subject: History 30 Grade: 12
Topic: Governance - Culture and Governance. Do these things to together?
Essential Question: Why is it important to understand governance and different perspectives around issues of
governance?
Materials:
- http://www.lop.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/SenatorEugeneForsey/time_travel/index-e.html
- Zaretta Hammonds book
Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain.
- Laptops/ access to a computer lab
- Sticky notes
- Long role of white paper
- Performance task handout
Cross-Curricular Competencies:
Students will develop thinking skills in the lesson as they analyze the important and notable moments of Canadas
governance history during the timeline activity. Students will also learn to think differently about their culture and cultural
background and the way in which it effects the lens through which they see governance. Students will be introduced to
learning to think critically about what they read and interact with in the unit.
Outcome(s):
DR 30.2 Discuss and evaluate different viewpoints, to make a tentative judgment or how an issue may cause controversy.
DR 30.3 - Assess how historical events in Canada have affected the present Canadian identity
PGP Goals:
2.1 knowledge of Canadian History, especially in reference to Saskatchewan and Western Canada I will accomplish this in
the lesson by giving student current information about Canadas governance system and by teaching students how to
examine the historical causes of contemporary issues and trends within Governance.
1.3 a commitment to social justice and the capacity to nurture an inclusive and equitable environment for the
empowerment of all learners I will accomplish this PGP goal by using culturally responsive methods of modeling my own
understanding of my culture in the opening activity, and by inviting students to understand theirs as well. By addressing
the variants of culture within the classroom the students will begin to relate with one another in respectful and inclusive
ways as we work to create an environment of understanding and acceptance of others to ensure the empowerment of all
learners.
Stage 2- Assessment
Assessment FOR Learning (formative) Assess the students during the learning to help determine next steps.
- free write to see how students understand their own culture and how it might affect their view of governance. After the
first activity, the teacher can collect these quick writes to see what the students are thinking about understanding culture
and its relationship with governance. Doing this at the beginning of the lesson allows for the teacher to re-address it at the
end of the lesson when they have gone over some of the governance content where disagreements might arise. Using this
formative assessment in this way the teacher is also able to see how the learning about understanding culture before
governance changes after the timeline activity.
- going over the timeline is a form of formative assessment and summative assessment as students will go through what
they learn and the teacher can see what they learned along the way as well as offer feedback if things are missing. Teacher
can fill in the holes or ask the students to research further around things that might be missing. Statements like I wonder
if .. you should consider that and find how that will affect the timeline.
Assessment OF Learning (summative) Assess the students after learning to evaluate what they have learned.
- Student created timeline that includes a historical analysis of governance in Canada that is presented to the class and will
be approved by all members before it becomes a permanent fixture on the timeline. In this way, the teacher is also a part
of the learning process as this activity enables the teacher to see what the students understood from the timeline and the
extra context research they did. This activity also gives the teacher the opportunity to see if there are any missing parts
and ideas in what was learned in this activity.
Stage 3- Learning Plan
~15 minutes hook activity: How does understanding your culture help you understand Governance students will do an activity to
understand their culture out of Zaretta Hammonds book Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain. In this lesson the teacher will
address her culture as a white European settler and how that affects her views on governance. This is an important exercise to do with
the class before we start doing the Unit so that students can understand themselves and why the think what they think about
governance.
Main Procedures/Strategies:
~15 minutes hook activity: How does understanding your culture help you understand Governance students will do an activity to
understand their culture out of Zaretta Hammonds book Culturally Responsive Teaching and The Brain. In this activity, the teacher
will model and address her culture and the different levels of culture as a white European settler explaining how that affects her views
on governance. p.58
This is an important exercise to do with the class before we start doing the Unit so that students can understand themselves and
why the think what they think about governance. Teacher models for students with each example how teachers culture has
affected their perspective on the questions that are asked. Students can see this modeling and make connections for their own
lives and cultures. Teacher reads the phrases out loud and the students write down their answers on a piece of paper.
- make sure to check in with students how this activity is going and If they are getting it and understanding how to answer the
questions. By directly asking if we are ready to move on the students will offer a response.
Quick write after brief sharing of answers if students choose to.
- Quick write will be handed in for Formative assessment (essential question) Students will respond to their experience of
understanding their own culture and will address whether they think it is important to do this activity at the outset of a unit
about Governance.
~ 25 mins: student led teaching- students make notes about what they learn about from this timeline website
http://www.lop.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/SenatorEugeneForsey/time_travel/index-e.html and students will create a timeline of how
Canadas Government came to be on a long poster board that will hang in the classroom as point of reference throughout the course.
Students will summarize main points answering who, what, where, when, why and historical significance of the specific time they
choose. Students will write these points on sticky notes that will be put onto the paper timeline and discussed as a class. If the whole
class agrees on the information and significance of the note, that note will be glued to the timeline. Students will have the option to
work in pairs, or alone. Students can do research in the computer lab, library or classroom. The timeline will be assigned to groups and
the students will make groups to work on various parts and times within the timeline. (this might take two class periods if students are
not close to finishing research at 10 to, bring students back to the classroom and recap and address the student free write to close the
lesson. If students working quickly, feel free to go on to the other two elements of the lesson, however if another class period is needed
students will have more time for research if they are working productively, and time to go through the final elements of this lesson)
~ 15 mins- go through the timeline as a group- each group that did research will speak about the points they chose to highlight and
why they were important enough to put on the timeline. Teacher will fill in any holes that might be missing from the timeline.
~15 mins introduce final project performance task and set date for first check-in
~ 5 mins recap and re-address the students free write- Teacher will clarify the importance of understanding our own cultures as we
learn about Governance in Canada to help everyone remain open to different perspectives.
Adaptations/Differentiation:
- a scribe for those students who have a hard time writing down the answers to the questions from the Culturally
Responsive Teaching and The Brain activity.
- partners for the timeline activity for those who want to work in partners, and options for individual work if there are those
who want to work independently.
- students can present their information seated in their desk, or at the front of the room, whatever they are comfortable
with.
- structured questions for students to answer about the time periods if they have a hard time getting started.
- availability of laptops for in class work if work in the library or computer lab is too distracting
Closing of lesson:
recap and re-address the students free write- Teacher will clarify the importance of understanding our own cultures as we
learn about Governance in Canada to help everyone remain open to different perspectives.
Teacher will ask students why they think it is important to address culture before we address governance in this unit.
Teacher will ask them what they learned from understanding how our individual cultures shape our perspectives. Teacher
will ask students leading questions that will get them to the desired answer: The goal of understanding culture before we
address governance is to create an open environment where we come learn and understand that every person has a
different view of governance that is a result of their culture and the way they view this topic. It is important to understand
this to create an open and honest environment for learners with differing/ various opinions to all have an opportunity to
learn the content and from one another.
Personal Reflection:
through them to indicate that I am no longer using them in the unit plan and have replaced them with different ideas and approaches. I have
completed Stage 4 of the unit plan and all content is written in red to show improvement from the last submission of the unit plan. I have also
revamped and reorganized the performance task and explained how it fits with all elements of GRASPS. To support students who could
become overwhelmed with this type of task I have worked check points into the unit to help students chunk the assignment. I have also
created a clearly outlined assignment handout and provided different means of presentation for those students who are not sure or motivated
to get started. I have also allowed students to have the choice on how they will present their piece, but it must be presented so that students in
the audience are able gain understanding from presentations and so that presenters can display what they have learned. All other
accommodations can be found in the adaptive dimensions section in Part 4 of the unit plan.
I have also changed many of the instructional strategies and have broken up explicit teaching times to incorporate different strategies
and activities for learning. I have also identified the use of different types of questions in the lesson activities section of the unit plan to
demonstrate my ability to use questioning for assessment and as a classroom strategy. I have also included in the lesson activities the
outcomes that are being met in each lesson to create connections of how the activities and lesson tie into the Saskatchewan Curriculum.
I have made significant changes to my unit plan and lesson plan based on the feedback that was given in the previous submissions
from the instructor as well as to help me reach my goals as a teacher. One of these goals is to create lessons that are not so teacher focused and
to have the students creating meaning for themselves as the teacher facilitates learning. I think that my unit plan and lesson plan provide
excellent examples of my ability to include varying teacher strategies to ensure student directive learning takes place in the classroom and
with the content. Another area that I wanted to work on was provided differentiation for students with different needs. In Section 4 of the unit
plan as well as in my lesson plan I have provided different ways that accommodation can take place for students needs to ensure that they
and then respond in a quick write. After that the students move into a timeline activity where they research and understand the timeline that
they choose to look at. At the end of the timeline activity the teacher can see what the students understand about key dates and what they
know and can identify and give feedback for additional research, or clarify and explain things for further understanding. The quick write is
also responded to by the teacher in the closing of the lesson as the teacher will restate why what students learnt in the beginning of the lesson
will help shape their understanding and approach to governance for the rest of the unit. Throughout the unit plan my assessment is followed
up and activities are in place that will help students move on with clarity after feeling confused. In the lesson plan I have also used specific
language to identify how I will meet the PGP goals in that lesson as well as stating why it is important that I, as the teacher do these things
both for the students and for myself as a learner. Students will work together on the time line and are encouraged to share their culture
answers if they feel comfortable doing so. In this way, my lesson is created to increase the connection between students and their ownership
of what they are learning about. By having students present timeline moments to the class however they are comfortable (from their desk, at
the front of the classroom, altogether, or just one student etc.), students are encouraged to work together for the good of the group and to