The Twelve Tribes of the Nation of Israe

l
Public Notice
BASADAR QADAR-SHAR YASHARAHLA(R)
Priest Basadar Qadar-Shar:Yasharahla
Jerusalem, Kingdom of Heaven, Israel
Joint-Ruler of the Commonwealth of Israel

We are God's "Defense Counsel", His "Attorney General", His "Department of Justi
ce", His "Department of State", and His "Ambassador" on earth just as Jesus was,
and we believe that doing so is the only way to achieve true sovereignty. In th
at sense:
1. We are fiduciaries of God, who is a "non-taxpayer", and therefore we are "non
-taxpayers". Our legal status takes on the character of the sovereign who we rep
resent, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b). Therefore, we become
"foreign diplomats" of our Lord, Lawgiver, and King.
"For God is the King of all the earth; Sing praises with understanding." [Psalms
47:7, Bible, NKJV]
"For the LORD is our Judge, the LORD is our Lawgiver, the LORD is our King; He w
ill save [and protect] us." [Isaiah 33:22, Bible, NKJV]
2. Our "domicile" is the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth and not any within the juris
diction of any man-made "state" or government. Click here for a powerful article
on this subject.
3. We are "Nonresident aliens" and "nationals" but not "citizens" under federal
law. The reason this must be so is that statutory "citizens of the United States
" pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1401 (who are all domiciled on federal territory and out
side the exclusive jurisdiction of any state) may not be classified as an instru
mentality of a foreign state under 28 U.S.C. 1603(b)(3).
4. We are not and cannot be "residents" or "inhabitants" of any man-made jurisdi
ction without having a conflict of interest and violating the first four Command
ments of the Ten Commandments found in Exodus 20. The Kingdom of Heaven is our e
xclusive legal "domicile", and our "permanent place of abode", and the source of
ALL of our permanent protection and security. We cannot and should not rely upo
n man's vain earthly laws as an idolatrous substitute for Gods sovereign laws fo
und in the Bible. Instead, only God's laws and the Common law, which is derived
from God's law, are suitable protection for our God-given rights.
“For I was ashamed to request of the king an escort of soldiers and horsemen to
help us against the enemy on the road, because we had spoken to the king, saying
‘The hand of our God is upon all those for good who seek Him, but His power and
His wrath are against all those who forsake Him.’ So we fasted and entreated ou
r God for this, and He answered our prayer.” [Ezra 8:21-22, Bible, NKJV]
5. We are "Foreign Ambassadors" and "Ministers of a Foreign State" called Heaven
. The U.S. Supreme Court said in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark below that "ministers of a
foreign state" may not be statutory "citizens of the United States".
"For our citizenship is in heaven [and not earth], from which we also eagerly wa
it for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ" [Philippians 3:20, Bible, NKJV]
"And Mr. Justice Miller, delivering the opinion of the court [legislating from t
he bench, in this case], in analyzing the first clause [of the Fourteenth Amendm
ent], observed that “the phrase ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ was intend
ed to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or
subjects of foreign states, born within the United States."[U.S. v. Wong Kim Ar
k, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456; 42 L.Ed. 890 (1898)]
6. Our dwelling, which is a "temporary and not permanent place of abode", is a "
Foreign Embassy". Notice we didn t say "residence", because only "residents" (al
iens) can have a "residence".
7. We are protected from federal government persecution by 18 U.S.C. §112 and th
e Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C., Part IV, Chapter 97.
8. We are a "stateless person" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) immune f
rom the jurisdiction of the federal courts, which are all Article IV, legislativ
e, territorial courts.
9. We are not allowed under God s law to conduct "commerce" or "intercourse" wit
h "the Beast" by sending to it our money or receiving benefits we did not earn.
Black s law dictionary defines "commerce" as "intercourse". The Bible defines "t
he Beast" as the "kings of the earth"/political rulers in Rev. 19:19:
“Commerce. …Intercourse by way of trade and traffic between different peoples or
states and the citizens or inhabitants thereof, including not only the purchase
, sale, and exchange of commodities, but also the instrumentalities [governments
] and agencies by which it is promoted and the means and appliances by which it
is carried on…” [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 269]
"Come, I will show you the judgment of the great harlot [the atheist totalitaria
n democracy] who sits on many waters [which are described as seas and multitudes
of people in Rev. 17:15[, with whom the kings of the earth [political rulers of
today] committed fornication [intercourse], and the inhabitants of the earth we
re made drunk with the wine of her fornication [intercourse, usurious and harmfu
l commerce]."
So he carried me away in the Spirit into the wilderness. And I saw a woman sitti
ng on a scarlet beast which was full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads a
nd ten horns. The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold
and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup full of abomina
tions and the filthiness of her fornication [intercourse]. And on her forehead a
name was written:
MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE
EARTH.
I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the ma
rtyrs of Jesus. And when I saw her, I marveled with great amazement." [Rev. 17:1
-6, Bible, NKJV]
“And I saw the beast, the kings [heathen political rulers and the unbelieving de
mocratic majorities who control them] of the earth [controlled by Satan], and th
eir armies, gathered together to make war against Him [God] who sat on the horse
and against His army.” [Revelations 19:19, Bible, NKJV]
The bible calls this kind of commerce "fornication" and "adultery" and describes
the fornicator called "Babylon the Great Harlot" basically as a democracy inste
ad of a Republic in Revelations chapters 17 to 19. This is consistent with the F
oreign Sovereign Immunities Act found in 28 U.S.C. §1605(a)(2), which says that
those who conduct "commerce" with the "United States" federal corporation within
its legislative jurisdiction thereby surrender their sovereignty. Participation
in our corrupted tax system also fits the classification of "commerce" within t
he meaning of this requirement.
The Lord agreed with these conclusions when he said:
"Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you now know that friendship [and "citizenship"
] with the world [or the governments of the world] is enmity with God? Whoever t
herefore wants to be a friend ["citizen" or "taxpayer" or "resident"] of the wor
ld makes himself an enemy of God." [James 4:4, Bible, NKJV]
Any other status imputed or assumed by the government amounts to "compelled asso
ciation" in violation of the First Amendment. We must surrender our sovereignty
to Him and become His fiduciaries in order to be granted sovereignty over our go
vernment and our own affairs, because ALL SOVEREIGNTY ultimately comes from Him:

"Because you [Solomon, the wisest man who ever lived] have done this , and have
not kept My covenant and My statutes [violated God s laws], which I have command
ed you, I will surely tear the kingdom [and all your sovereignty] away from you
and give it to your [public] servant." [1 Kings 11:9-13, Bible, NKJV]
"Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and He will lift you up [above your
government]." [James 4:10, Bible, NKJV]
“Those people who are not governed by GOD [and His law, both figuratively and li
terally] will be ruled by tyrants.” [William Penn (after which Pennsylvania was
named)]
“Let us hear the conclusion of this whole matter: Fear [respect] God and keep Hi
s commandments [Laws found in the Bible], for this is man’s all. For God will br
ing every work into judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil
.” [Eccl. 12:13-14, Bible, NKJV]
Below is a long list of the many additional reasons why we are completely immune
and possess "sovereign immunity" from suit or action by the state and federal g
overnments of the United States of America:
1. Our Congregation doesn t sell anything and we do everything for free speech a
nd religious reasons. We do not sell any documents, services, seminars, or produ
cts to ANYONE for any reason, nor do we market, "promote", or "advertise".
"Do no lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and
where thieves [in the government and the IRS] break in and steal; but lay up fo
r yourselves treasures in heaven where neither moth nor rust destroys and where
thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart
will be also." [Matt. 6:19-21, Bible, NKJV]
"...freely ye have received, freely give." [Matthew 10:8, Bible, NKJV]
"Buy the truth, and sell it not." [Proverbs 23:23, Bible, NKJV]
"What is my reward then? Verily that, when I preach the gospel, I may make the g
ospel of Christ without charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel." [1 Cor
inthians 9:18 ]
"And you shall take no bribe, for a bribe blinds the discerning and perverts the
words of the righteous." [Exodus 23:8, Bible, NKJV]
"He who is greedy for gain troubles his own house,But he who hates bribes will l
ive." [Prov. 15:27, Bible, NKJV]
"Surely oppression destroys a wise man s reason.And a bribe debases the heart."
[Ecclesiastes 7:7, Bible, NKJV]
3. Our entire mission constitutes a Petition for Redress of Grievances for the m
any violations of rights committed by government against the people both inside
and outside of its jurisdiction. This is also a right protected under the First
Amendment to the United States Constitution..
4. Our mission is religious speech and the free exercise of our religion, becaus
e we use God s law to denounce all of the bad things that government does and be
cause God commands us to resist the devil. Anyone in government who does not obe
y either the Constitution or legislation of our government is "the devil" in thi
s case. This too is protected under the First Amendment to the United States Con
stitution.
“So long as one’s faith is religiously based at time it is asserted, it does not
matter, for free exercise clause purposes, whether that faith derives from reve
lation, study, upbringing, gradual evolution or some source that appears entirel
y incomprehensible and constitutional protection cannot be denied simply because
early experience has left one particularly open to current religious beliefs.”
[Callahan v. Woods, 658 F.2d 679 (1981)]
“Once bona fide First Amendment issue is joined, burden that must be shouldered
by government to defend a regulation with impact on religious actions is a heavy
one, and basic standards is that a compelling state interest must be demonstrat
ed.” [Stevens v. Berger, 428 F.Supp. 896 (1977)]
5. This mission is a non-profit Christian religious ministry and an act of worsh
ip of our God. It is undertaken in full satisfaction of God s laws and all of th
e approaches recommended are based on the Bible and the Holy Spirit. Any attempt
to censor this information or to compel us to take any other approach is a viol
ation of our sincerely held religious views.
6. Our domicile and principal place of establishment is not located anywhere in
the United States (the country) and is therefore outside of the jurisdiction of
any court in that country. "Long arm" jurisdiction outside of the country may no
t be asserted unless there is harm occurring to specific individuals inside, and
unless that harm is OUR fault and not theirs. Since everything we produce is st
rictly of educational nature, comes with a disclaimer, and the choice to use it
is strictly that of the user and not us, then no culpability for any harm can be
assigned to us.
Therefore, no "long arm" jurisdiction may be asserted by any court within the co
untry. The exercise of the Right to Petition under the First Amendment can t be
labeled as "harm" or made into a crime by the government anyway because doing so
would clearly be unconstitutional.
"The claim and exercise of a [protected] constitutional right cannot be converte
d into a crime." [Miller v. U.S., 230 F 486, 489 (1956)]
7. Everything within this document consists of religious and political beliefs a
nd speech and opinion that is not factual and not actionable. As a result, nothi
ng on this website is even admissible as evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Ev
idence 610 and therefore can never even become the subject of any lawful court p
roceeding without violating the Separation of Powers.
8. We don t give legal advice, so we can t be accused of practicing law without
a license.
9. Everything we are doing comes directly from the Bible and from the government
s own laws.
10. We tell everyone to verify for themselves what we tell them so they don t ha
ve to believe us. We even show them where to go to verify it.
11. We aren t trying to persuade people to violate any law, and especially God s
laws.
12. We have earnestly and diligently sought out every source of government infor
mation on the subjects we cover and found none that conflict with the conclusion
s of our research
13. We frequently demand and insist that the government rebut not our opinions,
but the words right of their own mouth and out of their own laws, clearly showin
g that no one is responsible to pay income taxes. If they called our work frivol
ous, they would have to call their own words and laws frivolous! We have told th
e government that we would even post their rebuttal here for all to see if they
provide it as an affidavit from a person in authority. Since they haven t rebutt
ed anything on our website, then we must assume that they agree with EVERYTHING
on this website! Thank you, DOJ and IRS!
"Silence is a species of conduct, and constitutes an implied representation of t
he existence of facts in question. When silence is of such character and under s
uch circumstances that it would become a fraud, it will operate as an Estoppel."
[Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932]
14. We are practicing exactly what we preach so we are without hypocrisy (see Ro
m. 12:9)
15. The criminal laws of the federal government only apply on federal land under
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution. This is a result of the fa
ct that the federal government has no police powers inside of states of the Unio
n. There are very few exceptions to this, and all are identified in the federal
Constitution, including mail fraud and counterfeiting. Everything else comes exc
lusively under state jurisdiction. We therefore do not live inside the "United S
tates" identified in most federal statutes and are not subject to most federal s
tatutes.

16. We are not statutory "U.S. citizens" or "citizens of the United States" unde
r 8 U.S.C. §1401, where "United States" in that context means territories and po
ssessions of the United States and not states of the Union. We have noticed the
government on repeated occasions to ensure that their paperwork agrees with this
fact. Therefore, we are not subject to federal jurisdiction by virtue of citize
nship, which means the federal government has no in personam jurisdiction.
17. All "Acts of Congress", including the entire Internal Revenue Code, apply on
ly within the territory of the United States government, of which states of the
Union are not part because they are foreign states (see 86 C.J.S. §1).
18. The prohibition against declaratory judgments of federal courts found in 28
U.S.C. §2201 disallows these courts from ruling on rights within the context of
federal income taxes. There is only one place where Constitutional rights may no
t be enforced in federal courts or where Congress has the legislative authority
to suspend enforcement of Constitutional rights in courts of justice, which is i
nside the federal zone as per Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901). That case
also points out that the Congress cannot legislate away the applicability of rig
hts to states of the Union.
19. As per the Federal Register Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapt. 15, enforcement regulation
s are required in order for any part of the Internal Revenue Code to impose any
kind of penalty, and none exist. Click here to see a list of the missing regulat
ions. 26 U.S.C. §7805 says that the Secretary of the Treasury "shall" (must) wri
te regulations for the enforcement of the Internal Revenue Code. Since none exis
t for the IRS, then the IRC simply cannot be lawfully enforced by the IRS. There
fore, the Internal Revenue Code is special law that applies only to public offic
ers, employees, agents, and federal benefit recipients specifically exempted fro
m the requirement for implementing regulations published in the Federal Register
. No enforcement regulations are required for statutes that only apply to groups
exempted from the requirement for implementing regulations identified in 44 U.S
.C. §1505(a) and 5 U.S.C. §553(a). The affect of failure to publish implementing
regulations authorizing specific enforcement actions is identified in 26 CFR §6
01.702(a)(2)(ii), and it indicates that the rights of no member of the public at
large may be adversely affected by the actions of an agency:
26 CFR §601.702 Publication and public inspection
(ii) Effect of failure to publish.
Except to the extent that a person has actual and timely notice of the terms of
any matter referred to in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph which is required t
o be published in the Federal Register, such person is not required in any manne
r to resort to, or be adversely affected by, such matter if it is not so publish
ed or is not incorporated by reference therein pursuant to subdivision (i) of th
is subparagraph. Thus, for example, any such matter which imposes an obligation
and which is not so published or incorporated by reference will not adversely ch
ange or affect a person s rights.
24. The graduated income taxes that apply in the case of the IRS Form 1040 are u
nconstitutional when applied outside the federal zone, because they violate the
requirement for uniformity found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. C
onstitution. At least two state Supreme Court cases have agreed with this conclu
sion. See Culliton v. Chase, 25 P.2d 81 (1933) and Jensen v. Henneford, 53 P.2d
607 (1936). According to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution, A
rticle IV, Section I, Americans have a right and the IRS and state revenue agenc
ies have a duty to recognize and abide by such judicial decisions of the Supreme
Court of the state of Washington. To fail to do so is to deprive us of the equa
l protection of the laws.
25. The definitions of "United States" and "State" found in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9
) and (a)(10) and 26 CFR §31.3121(e)-1 clearly show that "United States" in the
context of the Internal Revenue Code means the federal zone.
26. The U.S. Tax Court is an Article I court established through the exclusive l
egislative authority of Congress under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Co
nstitution. The judges in this "court" (which is actually a federal office build
ing that is part of the Executive branch and not the Judicial branch) hold offic
e for a limited term of 15 years under 26 U.S.C. §7443(e). The Supreme Court sai
d the following of courts whose judges hold limited rather than lifetime terms,
which in turn confirms that the income tax only applies in federal territories,
keeping in mind that states of the Union are not territories:
"As the only judicial power vested in Congress is to create courts whose judges
shall hold their offices during good behavior, it necessarily follows that, if C
ongress authorizes the creation of courts and the appointment of judges for limi
ted time, it must act independently of the Constitution upon territory which is
not part of the United States within the meaning of the Constitution." [O Donohu
e v. United States, 289 U.S. 516, 53 S.Ct. 740 (1933)]
27. The states of the Union are "nations" under the law of nations and no nation
can enforce its legislation or "Acts of Congress" (which includes the Internal
Revenue Code) in a sovereign "foreign country" under the law of nations absent a
uthority from the Constitution itself, and according to the Supreme Court, no su
ch authority exists under the Sixteenth Amendment to enforce collection of direc
t income taxes upon natural born American Citizens inside the several states of
the American Union. To admit otherwise is to admit that the sovereign states of
the Union have been conquered and politically subjugated by the federal governme
nt in a silent and treasonous coup by a corrupted legal profession, and that we
are operating under a "de facto" government not authorized by our Constitution.
28. There is no statute anywhere in Subtitle a of Title 26, the Internal Revenue
Code, making anyone liable to pay federal income taxes. The result is that "tax
es" under Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code are entirely voluntary and not
mandatory. The only section of the I.R.C. that refers to any kind of duty is 26
U.S.C. §6151, and this section says that a person shall pay the amount appearin
g on a return. 26 U.S.C. §6020(b) then indicates that the only person who can fi
ll out and file a return is the person against whom the tax is laid: the IRS can
not do a substitute for return on a natural person under subtitle A of the Inter
nal Revenue Code.
29. The Department of INJustice has no authority under the Constitution or under
the U.S. Code or under any delegation order in place, to prosecute anyone for v
iolations of the criminal portions of the Internal Revenue Code. All attempts to
enforce the Internal Revenue Code criminal provisions inside states of the Unio
n amounts to treason, extortion under the color of law, breach of fiduciary duty
, fraud, and a violation of 18 U.S.C. §1589(c) (forced labor) and is subject to
mandatory restitution under 18 U.S.C. §1593.
30. 26 U.S.C. §7343 identifies the legal "person" who can be prosecuted for crim
inal violations of the Internal Revenue Code, and that definition does not inclu
de most natural persons and certainly doesn t include us.
31. IRS has no legal authority to assess penalties against natural persons who a
re not elected or appointed officers of the United States government, and we are
not such officers.
32. Most private employers within states of the Union are not authorized to be w
ithholding agents for federal income taxes because of the definition of "withhol
ding agent" found in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(16). Even if they want to, they are not
authorized by law to do so and comity may not operate to expand federal powers i
n this area to prejudice the natural rights of state citizens. Only fear and ter
rorism on the part of the federal government and unconstitutional refusal of fed
eral and state courts to punish such abuses explain why private companies comply
at all with the unlawful demands of the IRS to help them "enforce" the internal
revenue code against persons for whom it was never intended.
33. If revenues collected under Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code are mand
atory, then the Constitution conflicts with itself, because such revenue collect
ion amounts to slavery in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Cons
titution. This absurd consequence proves that such collections are not authorize
d and therefore can only be treated as voluntary, which means that they are dona
tions and not taxes.
34. The constitutional definition of "income" by the Supreme Court excludes the
earnings of natural persons from labor in the context of taxes they have to pers
onally pay. Federal corporations who derive "profit" from labor of their employe
es should include it as "income", but not the people who performed the labor. Th
e reason is because to tax the labor of a man would amount to slavery in violati
on of the Thirteenth Amendment. Also, since the federal government only has juri
sdiction over "commerce" between the states and with foreign nations, and becaus
e the labor of a human being cannot be classified as "commerce" under 15 U.S.C.
17, then the federal government has no jurisdiction to tax the worker s labor or
earnings directly from labor. They can tax corporations that farm out labor, bu
t they can t tax the worker directly.
"Every man has a natural right to the fruits of his own labor, is generally admi
tted; and no other person can rightfully deprive him of those fruits, and approp
riate them against his will..." [The Antelope, 23 U.S. 66; 10 Wheat 66; 6 L.Ed.
268 (1825)]
____________________________________________________________
United States Code
TITLE 15 - COMMERCE AND TRADE
CHAPTER 1 - MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
Sec. 17. Antitrust laws not applicable to labor organizations
The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce….
35. We are not involved in tax evasion "schemes", because our materials are inte
nded for "nontaxpayers" who are not "liable" under subtitle A of the Internal Re
venue Code. Tax evasion involves evading a known legal duty, which means not pay
ing taxes that you had a provable liability to pay. Those "liable" under a posit
ive law statute enforced using implementing regulations published in the Federal
Register are not the people we want reading this document. Nor can we be held r
esponsible for those who misuse the materials offered here for purposes they wer
e not intended.
36. We do not "promote" (sell) anything, including "abusive tax shelters" under
26 U.S.C. §6700 or 6701. Only people who are "liable", who are "taxpayers", who
have "taxable income", and who are within the territorial jurisdiction of the fe
deral United States (called the "federal zone") can even need or use tax shelter
s and we don t want these types of people using our materials or our website, be
cause they ought to pay what the positive law (not "code", but "positive law") s
ays they owe. The definition of "person" that applies in the case of 26 U.S.C. §
6700 is defined in 26 U.S.C. §6671(b) as an an "officer or employee of a corpora
tion, or a member or employee of a partnership" who has a legal duty (liability)
to withhold or deduct taxes for which the entity he is responsible for is liabl
e. We are not such a "person" or organization so these laws don t even apply to
us, even if we were within the territorial jurisdiction of the federal governmen
t, which we are not. The rules for statutory interpretation also emphasize that
even though the word "includes" is used in this definition, it is a word of limi
tation, not enlargement.
Here is the rule from Black s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 581:
"“Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. A maxim of statutory interpretation mea
ning that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another. Burgin v. For
bes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325; Newblock v. Bowles, 170 Okl. 487, 40 P.2d
1097, 1100. Mention of one thing implies exclusion of another. When certain per
sons or things are specified in a law, contract, or will, an intention to exclud
e all others from its operation may be inferred. Under this maxim, if statute sp
ecifies one exception to a general rule or assumes to specify the effects of a c
ertain provision, other exceptions or effects are excluded.” [Black’s Law Dictio
nary, Sixth Edition, page 581]
See cites on "includes" and also read section 5.6.17 of the Great IRS Hoax for f
urther details on why interpreting the word "includes" as other than a word of l
imitation results in absurd consequences that are completely incompatible with t
he rulings of the Supreme Court and with the notion that we are "a society of la
ws and not of men" (see Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)).
37. Our goals are nearly the same as the IRS mission statement, which says:
"Provide America s [non]taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand
and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity
and fairness to all." [Internal Revenue Manual, section 1.1.1.1]
Our goals are complementary to the IRS because we help only NONtaxpayers while t
hey help only "taxpayers". The IRS discriminates against nontaxpayers on their w
ebsite and on their phone support line but somebody has to help them so we decid
ed to create a ministry of volunteers to help them with this job. For instance,
IRS has a Publication 1 entitled "Taxpayer Bill of Rights" but they don t have a
similar publication entitled "Nontaxpayer Bill of Rights". Our whole website co
uld therefore be classified as basically one big "Nontaxpayer Bill of Rights". W
e want to help these poor and disadvantaged people understand their responsibili
ties under the tax laws and to pay no more than the law requires of them, becaus
e the IRS isn t helping them at all. They are verbally abused on the phone suppo
rt line, as we found out from personal experience, and they are penalized and li
tigated against wrongfully and we think this is disgraceful. This kind of pernic
ious discrimination violates the Fourteenth Amendment Equal protection clause an
d ought to be declared unconstitutional because it is being done based on "natio
nal origin", whereby Americans who are "nationals" and "nonresident aliens" are
"nontaxpayers". We don t decide who the "nontaxpayers" are either. We simply edu
cate people and let them decide what they think they are, which is more than the
IRS does. We also want to assist the IRS by preventing these "nontaxpayers" fro
m sending in frivolous or inaccurate or unnecessary forms or tax returns that ne
edlessly interfere with the proper and lawful administration of the federal and
state tax laws.
38. Any effort to intimidate or harass us amounts to slavery, in violation of 18
U.S.C. §1589(c), which is punishable by MANDATORY restitution under 18 U.S.C. §
1593. We will extract these penalties from the private funds of any government e
mployee who attempts such extortion using a Bivens Action.
As a consequence of the above and many other reasons documented, we are not subj
ect to federal or state jurisdiction for this ministry or any of our activities
and are protected by the First Amendment freedom of speech and freedom of assemb
ly clauses. What jury would ever convict a person and do an injunction against h
im to shut his Church down for exercising his First Amendment right of free spee
ch and for doing what his God and his religious beliefs tells him to do? Juries
like having their First Amendment rights and they hate any government official w
ho tries to infringe on them! Some of the tax-related websites that the governme
nt has shut down over the years were indeed selling bad ideas and flawed concept
s. The elimination of these websites actually hurts the government because the o
nly thing left for people to read is our stuff, and we have done our homework an
d continue to improve everything on our site using your valuable feedback! Crook
s in government are actually forcing people to read our stuff by taking away oth
er choices and we believe this will help the tax honesty movement in the long ru
n by keeping people focused on the right issues and the truth instead of frivolo
us babble. THANK YOU, IRS AND DOJ!
The Bible says in Matt. 6:25-34 that we shouldn t worry about our future and sho
uld trust God to provide for us and protect us. That is exactly what we are doin
g folks: Obeying Him and doing exactly what He says we are supposed to do. No go
vernment can condemn that or make it a violation of law and if they do, then the
Bible also says we should disobey them.
"We ought to obey God rather than men." [Acts 5:27-29, Bible, NKJV]
All we are doing is sharing God s message of Love and the Truth with people and
letting them decide what they can or should do with that Truth. That is exactly
what Jesus did, and no one can pass a law against that.
“But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.” [Gal. 5:18, Bible
, NKJV]
If you disagree with us, then please honor our due process rights under the Cons
titution by answering our Tax Deposition Questions with a signed and notarized a
ffidavit so that we can see exactly what aspect of our views you regard as false
or incorrect. If you can provide positive law statutes, implementing regulation
s published in the Federal Register, and/or a judicial interpretation of the Sup
reme Court (and not lower) that contradicts our views, we will be happy to chang
e our materials to correct any errors you find. Otherwise, don t go around sland
ering and criticizing us if you aren t willing to prove why you think we are wro
ng. Put up or shut up. To approach our position any other way is vanity and hypo
crisy and slander and deceit and we hope people who act this way will get the re
ward they justly deserve described in the Bible:
"The Son of Man will send out His angels, and they will gather out of His kingdo
m all things that offend, and those who practice lawlessness, 42and will cast th
em into the furnace of fire. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth. 43Then
the righteous will shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. He wh
o has ears to hear, let him hear!" [Matt. 13:41-43, Bible, NKJV]
Agents of the government who pursue people like us will often use as their justi
fication:
"We re here to protect taxpayers from harm and exploitation so they aren t mis
lead by false information."
YEAH...RIGHT! Comments like that are not the real motive of such people. The rea
l motive is to simplify the job of STEALING money from most Americans, who eithe
r are or should be "nontaxpayers". We gravely doubt the sincerity of the people
who make such statements, because of the illegal financial conflict of interest
they have in violation of 18 U.S.C. §208. Nevertheless, our information isn t ta
rgeted towards those who are "taxpayers" and we tell those people in our audienc
e to visit http://www.irs.gov/ for educational information. You could say that w
e are helping the IRS mission as expressed above.
Let s entertain the vain notion that the IRS sincerely wants to protect "taxpaye
rs". Let s look at whether they do that and how they do that. Lets look at wheth
er the standards they apply to others like us are as rigorous as those they appl
y to themselves:
1. The IRS doesn t want "taxpayers" getting false information, and yet their own
Internal Revenue Manual says you can t trust ANY of their publications or forms
! See section 4.10.7.2.8 of the Internal Revenue Manual, which says:
"IRS Publications, issued by the National Office, explain the law in plain langu
age for taxpayers and their advisors... While a good source of general informati
on, publications should not be cited to sustain a position." [IRM, 4.10.7.2.8 (0
5-14-1999)]
2. The courts have routinely held that the IRS can t be held responsible for any
thing the IRS tells you in their publications or forms. See:
o Great IRS Hoax, section 3.18 entitled "IRS Publications"
o Federal Courts and the IRS own IRM Say the IRS is NOT RESPONSIBLE for Its Act
ions or its Words or For Following Its Own Written Procedures!
3. The courts have routinely held that the IRS can t be held legally responsible
for anything they tell you on their telephone support line or at an IRS audit.
4. The IRS cites court rulings in their pleadings and their publications that ar
en t even relevant to most Americans, who do not reside in any United States Jud
icial District and who are outside of federal jurisdiction. They therefore abuse
court rulings and judicial precedent as a form of political propaganda disguise
d to LOOK like law. This violates their own Internal Revenue Manual, which says
in section 4.10.7.2.9.8 that they cannot cite any case below the Supreme Court t
o apply to more than the person in question.
So if anyone BUT the IRS gives out false information, they end up in jail or wit
h an injunction against them, but if the IRS gives out the false information, IT
S OK, according to the courts. What kind of ridiculous illogic is that? HYPOCRI
TES! The Bible says this kind of hypocrisy is DESPICABLE! The Fourteenth Amendme
nt, Section 1 also guarantees to ALL, including "nontaxpayers" AND the IRS, the
equal protection of the laws. Since when are wrongdoers in a government corporat
ion called the IRS entitled to more protection from the law or from "judge made
law" than natural persons outside of federal jurisdiction?
"No duty rests more imperatively upon the courts than the enforcement of those c
onstitutional provisions intended to secure that equality of rights which is the
foundation of free government." [Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U.S. 150
(1897)]
Those who practice such blatant hypocrisy should be thrown in jail for such clea
rly discriminatory and lawless actions:
"Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees [IRS lawyers], hypocrites! For you are like w
hitewashed tombs which indeed appear beautiful outwardly, but inside are full of
dead men s bones and all uncleanness. Even so you also outwardly appear righteo
us to men, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness." [Matt. 23:27-2
8, Bible, NKJV]
_______________________________________
"There is a generation that is pure in its own eyes, yet is not washed from its
filthiness." [Prov. 30:12, Bible, NKJV]
Don t go pursuing people for providing false information until you get your own
act together first! Don t expect people to be responsible for their errors until
their government is responsible for the same thing:
"Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or ill, it teac
hes the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government beco
mes a lawbreaker [or a hypocrite with double standards], it breeds contempt for
the law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.
To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the
means...would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this
Court should resolutely set its face.” [Justice Brandeis, Olmstead v. United Sta
tes, 277 U.S. 438, 485. (1928)]
IRS: You are breeding contempt for the law by refusing to be held to the same st
andards as others. The reason people like me even have to make websites like thi
s is to oppose your lawless actions and your BAD and hypocritical example!
"Judge not, that you be not judged. 2For with what judgment you judge, you will
be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you. 3And w
hy do you [the IRS] look at the speck in your brother s [fellow American s] eye,
but do not consider the plank in your own eye? 4Or how can you say to your brot
her, "Let me remove the speck from your eye ; and look, a plank is in your own e
ye? 5Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see
clearly to remove the speck from your brother s eye. 6"Do not give what is holy
[My liberty or property or money or this ministry] to the dogs [the government];
nor cast your pearls [liberty or property or money] before swine [the IRS, by r
equesting a 501(c)3 exemption], lest they trample them under their feet, and tur
n and tear you in pieces." [Matt. 7:1-6, Bible, NKJV]
The only place where the kind of blatant hypocrisy demonstrated by our tyrannica
l government is authorized by law is inside the federal zone where the Bill of R
ights do not apply. It is not authorized inside states of the Union either by ou
r Constitution or by federal statutes, because the separation of powers doctrine
and the Tenth Amendment ensures that federal legislative jurisdiction and feder
al police powers do not extend into the states. Federal police powers extend int
o federal "States" but not into "states" of the Union.
One of the things that the hypocritical government likes to do when they try to
prosecute tax resisters is something like the following:
"Mr. X knew or should have known that his actions were against the law, were fal
se, or were frivolous."
But this conclusion is completely inconsistent with the facts stated below:
· The Internal Revenue Code is not "law" or "positive law", and therefore unenfo
rceable against the general public, and there is no evidence of consent to direc
t taxation anywhere in the Constitution against people in states of the Union wh
o are outside of federal jurisdiction. Therefore, neither the Constitution nor t
he Internal Revenue Code are admissible as evidence that the people in states of
the Union ever consented to enforcement or collection actions by the Federal Go
vernment. Since our system of government is based on consent of the governed acc
ording to the Declaration of Independence, and since the people in the states ne
ver explicitly consented, then all enforcement actions by the IRS against people
in the states are unjust and unlawful and illegal, not to mention in conflict w
ith Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4, and Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Co
nstitution. See the legislative notes under 1 U.S.C. §204 and Great IRS Hoax, se
ctions 5.4.1 through 5.4.1.5.
· The courts refuse to hold the IRS accountable for false information in their p
ublications, their forms. Great IRS Hoax, section 3.18 entitled "IRS Publication
s"
· The courts refuse to hold the IRS accountable for false information they give
on their 800 telephone support line.
· All of the lawyers who litigate against the government in a tax case are licen
sed by the government, and therefore have a conflict of interest.
· The publishers who provide information about tax law and tax compliance can an
d often are destroyed and punished if they don t tell the public what the IRS wa
nts them to hear, which by the way is seldom in the best interests of the public
and is skewed to benefit the government and expand the government s power.
· The Internal Revenue Code is deliberately vague and ambiguous and therefore is
"void for vagueness". See Great IRS Hoax, sections 5.11 through 5.12, and 5.6.1
7.
· The courts can t properly hear matters relating to income taxes on individuals
without a severe conflict of interest.
· There is a wide variation of the federal circuits in the interpretation of the
tax laws and they are completely inconsistent with each other on many fundament
al issues. Therefore, we can t get a reasonable or consistent idea what the law
requires by listening to the federal courts because even after 87 years of litig
ation surrounding the Sixteenth Amendment, the courts STILL can t agree on the m
ost fundamental aspects of the income taxes described by the Internal Revenue Co
de. See Great IRS Hoax, section 3.19.1.
· The Supreme Court has stated that our tax system is entirely voluntary. If it
is voluntary, then Americans can choose to "unvolunteer" without adverse consequ
ences. See Flora v. United States, 362 U.S. 145 (1960).
· The Internal Revenue Code was repealed in 1939. See section 4 at 53 Stat. 1. N
ot only was it repealed, but all previous Revenue Acts were repealed as well. Th
is leaves us with NO TAX LAWS whatsoever at the national level. We have repealed
"codes" and "statutes", but we have no bona fide tax "law". Click here (large f
ile, 54 Mbytes) to read the 1939 code for yourself.
What it all therefore boils down to is essentially a matter of "fear, superstiti
on, and personal belief", and not science or evidence. That which is based only
on belief and which cannot be scientifically proven is called "religion". Since
the First Amendment prohibits the government establishing religion, then we are
not allowed to believe anything that might favor the government absent admissibl
e, positive law evidence, because this would be Idolatry in violation of the fir
st four commandments of the Ten commandments. Evidence required to prove liabili
ty also cannot take the form of "prima facie evidence" either. Prima facie evide
nce is "presumptive evidence". It is a sin for Christians to "assume" or "presum
e" anything, and it is also a violation of due process that prejudices rights to
assume anything (see Psalms 19:12-13, Numbers 15:30). Consequently, it would be
prejudicial and a violation of the Fifth Amendment to deprive a person of due p
rocess by admitting any "presumed" evidence of law such as the Internal Revenue
Code into evidence in a tax trial. See a book called the Great IRS Hoax, section
4.3.12 for further details on the I.R.C. being a state sponsored religion in vi
olation of the First Amendment.
Consequently, without enacted positive law on the federal tax subject, there is
no way for a reasonable man to know what the "law" requires of him without consu
lting a government-licensed expert or authority who has a conflict of interest.
At the same time, being compelled to consult or trust an expert or authority vio
lates our religious beliefs, which say that we aren t allowed to trust any man a
nd can ONLY trust the law.
“Cursed is the one who trusts in man [or man-made government, or an "expert"], w
ho depends on flesh for his strength and whose heart turns away from the Lord. H
e will be like a bush in the wastelands; he will not see prosperity when it come
s. He will dwell in the parched places of the desert, in a salt land where no on
e lives. But blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in H
im. He will be like a tree planted by the water that sends out its roots by the
stream. It does not fear when heat comes; its leaves are always green. It has no
worries in a year of drought and never fails to bear fruit.” [Jeremiah 17:5-8,
Bible, NIV]
You can t compel us to violate our religious beliefs under the First Amendment,
so please therefore tell us once and for all, IRS and state taxing authorities:
"By what means can the average man find out what the law really requires of him
in an unambiguous, concise way that doesn t force him to rely on any man and der
ives ONLY from law and his own understanding of law? How can the average person,
without a legal education and having been dumbed-down in the government-run sch
ools, discern exactly what he is supposed to do? And if there is no source of in
formation he can refer to that isn t biased or influenced by a conflict of inter
est in some way, how can you say he knew or should have known anything ? And i
f you can t claim that he should have known anything, then how can you prosecute
any tax crime, since all tax crimes have the prerequisite that willful disobed
ience of a known positive law duty/liability must have occurred? Presumption ca
nnot be the basis for any conclusions about liability, because they violate due
process of law and Christian beliefs (see Psalms 19:12-13, Numbers 15:30), so by
what rational basis may people be informed about their duties under an Internal
Revenue Code that isn t even enacted positive law, but simply presumptive evide
nce to begin with? Under such circumstances, the only reasonable thing to call t
he Internal Revenue Code is simply a state-sponsored federal religion in violati
on of the First Amendment which is based on presumption, which Christians cannot
participate in because God s law forbids presumption. See the book Great IRS Ho
ax section 2.8.2 for further details on why presumption violates God s laws."
Until you can rebut the evidence of your wrongdoing succinctly, in good faith, a
nd with clean hands , then any attempt to prosecute people for violating a stat
e-sponsored federal religion called the Internal Revenue Code amounts to terrori
sm, malicious prosecution, violates the Constitution, and is done in bad faith.
Until people of average intelligence and without legal training can learn by rea
ding the law themselves exactly what they are supposed to do, then we don t have
 a society of law, but of men. A society of men and not law is the opposite of t
he legislative intent of the Constitution (see Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1
803).
A society of men and not law results when we have to rely on computers, or exper
ts, or judges, or lawyers with a conflict of interest to tell us what the law re
quires. It is a recipe for tyranny and violates the separation of powers doctrin
e. It is not to be tolerated in a free country or by a free people!
"But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, cons
idered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional
law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in secur
ing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws,
so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts bill of rights, the govern
ment of the commonwealth may be a government of laws and not of men. For the v
ery idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living,
or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of a
nother, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being
the essence of slavery itself." [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)]
If the IRS is going to to try to claim that this Church provides "false" informa
tion, then who are the people who claim to have been hurt by it, and by what leg
al basis can they proceed? Furthermore, where is the government s evidence that
proves that the harm experienced by such people exceeds that which we will exper
ience from the Lord Himself by NOT offering them the materials (see Deut. 27:11-
26 and Deut. 28:15-68)? The government s sole authority is not only to use law t
o prevent harm, but more importantly to MINIMIZE it among all parties concerned.
We have been teaching for years and we have NEVER been informed even once by a
person who has been "harmed" by following any of our teachings. The reason they
NEVER complain is because we tell them that they need to verify the information
for themselves and act on their own information and convictions. We tell them th
at our teachings are not legal advice, but a starting point for their own educat
ion about taxes and sovereignty. They know this, so they take what we provide wi
th the requisite caution and discretion to not allow themselves to be harmed by
it. The only person who would be harmed by our teachings is the person who DISRE
GARDS our warnings, and the only thing they have to blame for that kind of harm
is their own ignorance and irresponsibility.
IRS: Why don t you go out and prosecute such people for criminal stupidity, beca
use they deserve all the punishment they inflict on themselves with the aid of y
our equally ignorant employees facilitating the punishment. The purpose of gover
nment is NOT to protect people from the harmful effects of their own laziness an
d stupidity. Nature will handle that and you aren t their parent.
We state throughout our teachings and writings that everything we do derives dir
ectly from the Bible and the Word of God. The Bible, the words right out of the
governments own mouth, and the Holy Spirit are the only three authorities we use
to condemn the unlawful acts of government servants. We don t rely on opinions
of any kind, but only on the Holy Word of God in everything we do. We also state
that this Congregation is entirely religious speech and that its very existence
is a result of obedience to God s commands by the members. The government may n
ot interfere with this kind of free exercise of our religion, and it may therefo
re not interfere with our free speech by trying to stop the publishment of the e
ntirely religious views expressed. Consequently, even if the IRS did somehow man
age to fabricate false evidence which fraudulently linked our activities with co
mmercial speech, it would still have a legal and a moral obligation to identify
exactly what information in our teachings regarding taxes is false, because it c
an t order us to shut down the entire Church. It could only order us to shut dow
n that portion which is:
1. Within their territorial jurisdiction, which does not extend beyond the feder
al zone for Subtitle A income taxes. No subject matter jurisdiction within state
s of the Union is granted to Congress under the Constitution for other than coun
terfeiting (Art. 1, Section 8, Clause 6) and mail fraud (Art. 1, Sect. 8, Clause
7) and taxes on foreign commerce external to states of the Union (Art. 1, Secti
on 8, Clause 3).
2. Demonstrated to be false with evidence that includes both law and facts suppo
rting the application of the law.
3. Directly connected with commercial speech.
4. Connected with a promise of performance or results that is not in fact delive
red in each case. Note that we don t guarantee or promise any results based on t
he use of administered knowledge.
5. Is in no way connected with religious expression (note that EVERYTHING done b
y this Congregation we regard as religious expression).
Therefore, the government cannot order any of our documents removed without meet
ing the burden of proving (as the moving party) all of the above elements in eac
h case and for each specific piece of information they want removed. Any other a
pproach would be a violation of Due Process under the Sixth Amendment and of Fre
e Speech and Religion in the First Amendment. Everything not meeting the above c
riteria that appears in this document would have to remain because the governmen
t can t interfere with the free exercise of religion and everything here is rela
ted to religion and the practical application of God s laws and words to our eve
ryday lives as Christians. The essence of worship is obedience, and this documen
t is nothing more than an act of obedience to God s laws and His sovereign calli
ng on our life. The only way we can or will correct anything in our teachings is
if the government rebuts the evidence we present in our Tax Deposition Question
s that came right out of their own mouth, proving irrefutably that they are invo
lved in criminal extortion in regards to illegally enforcing a voluntary federal
donation program (for "nontaxpayers") under Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue
Code.
When the government tries to implement an injunction to stop a particular activi
ty that violates the tax laws within the federal zone (which we do not reside in
, by the way) under the authority of 26 U.S.C. §7402(a), it must show four thing
s, as it had to show in the case of the prosecution of Eddie Kahn:
1. It is likely that the United States will suffer irreparable injury if defenda
nt s conduct continues. No attempt is made to define "irreparable", which leaves
it entirely up to a corrupt judge s discretion to define. Our belief is that if
it simply amounts to a loss of money, money can be replaced at any time. The go
vernment STEALS plenty of it every day to make up for the efforts of honest peop
le who don t pay Subtitle A taxes because they know the law doesn t require them
to.
2. It is unlikely that defendants will be harmed by the injunction. Only a psych
ic person could predict the future, and so this too is an attempt to leave the d
ecision up to a corrupted judge whose retirement benefits would be jeopardized i
f he ruled in favor of the defendant. This clearly violates 28 U.S.C. §144 and 2
8 U.S.C. §455 and provides sufficient basis for all federal judges to recuse the
mselves who is receiving government benefits that are derived from Subtitle A in
come taxes. The only ethical party who can try the case is a panel of impartial
citizens under the "Savings to Suitors" clause.
3. The United States is likely to prevail on the injunction. Once again, only a
"psychic" could predict the future, and our judges are not tested for their psyc
hic abilities, nor should they be relied upon as the sole arbiter of anything. T
his type of determination can only be left to a jury and MUST be left to a jury
under 28 U.S.C. §2402. Tyrant judges will try to obviate the need for a jury tri
al by manipulating the evidence and making the case into a declaratory judgment,
which they are not allowed to do under 28 U.S.C. §2201.
4. An injunction will serve the public interest. The public interest can NEVER b
e served within a republican system of self-governance by keeping the public ign
orant and misinformed or unable to freely debate matters of politics and governm
ent corruption that are revealed on this website. It can only be in the public i
nterest to disallow free speech where such speech is demonstrably false, where i
t is being sold as a promised remedy to a situation, and where false assurances
or promises are being made about such speech that mislead or injured others. We
have not and will not make any promises of any kind about the effectiveness of o
ur teachings and we believe that anyone who promises a specific positive result
from the corrupted band of criminals who run our government is a fool and an idi
ot and should not be using our teachings or indicating that he represents or is
affiliated with us in any way whatsoever. Lack of free speech, as a matter of fa
ct, can NEVER be in the public interest, according to the Supreme Court:
"This court has not yet fixed the standard by which to determine when a danger s
hall be deemed clear; how remote the danger may be and yet be deemed present; an
d what degree of evil shall be deemed sufficiently substantial to justify resort
to abridgment of free speech and assembly as the means of protection. To reach
sound conclusions on these matters, we must bear in mind why a state is, ordinar
ily, denied the power to prohibit dissemination of social, economic and politica
l doctrine which a vast majority of its citizens believes to be false and fraugh
t with evil consequence. [274 U.S. 357, 375]
Those who won our independence believed that the final end of the state was to m
ake men free to develop their faculties, and that in its government the delibera
tive forces should prevail over the arbitrary. They valued liberty both as an en
d and as a means. They believed liberty to the secret of happiness and courage t
o be the secret of liberty. They believed that freedom to think as you will and
to speak as you think are means indispensable to the discovery and spread of pol
itical truth; that without free speech and assembly discussion would be futile;
that with them, discussion affords ordinarily adequate protection against the di
ssemination of noxious doctrine; that the greatest menace to freedom is an inert
people; that public discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a f
undamental principle of the American government. 3 They recognized the risks to
which all human institutions are subject. But they knew that order cannot be sec
ured merely through fear of punishment for its infraction; that it is hazardous
to discourage thought, hope and imagination; that fear breeds repression; that r
epression breeds hate; that hate menaces stable government; that the path of saf
ety lies in the opportunity to discuss freely supposed grievances and proposed r
emedies; and that the fitting remedy for evil counsels is good ones. Believing i
n the power of reason as applied through public discussion, they eschewed silenc
e [274 U.S. 357, 376] coerced by law-the argument of force in its worst form. Re
cognizing the occasional tyrannies of governing majorities, they amended the Con
stitution so that free speech and assembly should be guaranteed.” [Whitney v. Ca
lifornia, 274 U.S. 357 (1927)]
This is a religious Nation, undertaken for religious reasons identified in the B
ible, as we say in our teachings. In particular, the motivation is obedience to
God s laws and His commandments. The first commandment found in the first four o
f the Ten Commandments is to love our God with all our heart, mind, and soul, an
d to OBEY his commandments
“And now, Israel, what does the Lord your God require of you, but to fear the Lo
rd your God, to walk in all His ways and to love Him, to serve the Lord your God
with all your heart and with all your soul, and to keep the commandments of the
Lord and His statutes [laws] which I command you today for your good?” [Deut. 1
0:12-13, Bible, NKJV]
"For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandment
s are not burdensome." [1 John 5:3, Bible, NKJV]
The result of not obeying God is idolatry, rebellion, and eternal damnation by G
od. Rebellion against God s laws and commands is therefore something that God in
evitably will punish and be angry with, which means that we as a prospective def
endant not only of the government, but also of God s final judgment, would defin
itely be "harmed" by obeying the government and thereby disobeying God. Here are
just a few examples of HOW we will inevitably be punished for putting obedience
to government above obedience to God when the two conflict:
· "If you do not carefully observe all the words of this law that are written in
this book, that you may fear this glorious and awesome name, THE LORD YOUR GOD,
then the LORD will bring upon you and your descendants extraordinary plagues--g
reat and prolonged plagues--and serious and prolonged sicknesses." [Deut. 28:58-
59, Bible, NKJV]
· "And I heard another voice from heaven saying, Come out of her [Babylon the G
reat Harlot, which in this case is the U.S. government], my people, lest you sha
re in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues. " [Revelation 18:4, Bible,
NKJV]RESULT OF OBEDIENCE TO GOVERNMENT AND CONSEQUENT DISOBEDIENCE TO GOD: Being
the object of plagues.
· "Cursed is the one who does not confirm [by study and peer review on this webs
ite] all the words of this [God s] law. "And all the people shall say, "Amen!"
[Deu. 27:26, Bible, NKJV]
RESULT OF OBEDIENCE TO GOVERNMENT AND CONSEQUENT DISOBEDIENCE TO GOD: A curse, l
ike the curse that accompanied Cane and Satan for their disobedience.
· "Blessed are those who are persecuted [by the government and the IRS, no less]
for righteousness sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." [Matt. 5:10, Bib
le, NKJV]
RESULT OF OBEDIENCE TO GOD AND CONSEQUENT DISOBEDIENCE TO GOVERNMENT:
If the result of following our teachings causes temporary government persecution
, then God will permanently bless us. We ask you now which is greater: permanent
blessings from God or temporary persecution from government? The Bible says tha
t God s blessings are more important, so in the big picture, Christians will rec
eive the greatest blessings and therefore the least "harm" by disobeying a corru
pted government that has contempt for God and for the tax laws.
The result of the above, and many other Bible scriptures on the same subject is
a whole new definition for "injury" or "harm" that transcends man s vain earthly
laws and which renders any determinations by a corrupted government court relat
ing to "harm" as moot. Since the judicial doctrine of "separation of Church and
State" demands that the government cannot define what either "religion" or "God"
is, then the government certainly cannot say that we would not be "harmed" by d
isobeying God in the process of obeying a judge who disagrees with what we think
God told us to do. Such a conceited judge could only be described as having con
tempt and discrimination for us, for the Constitution (especially the First Amen
dment freedom of religion clause), and ultimately for God s words and His laws.
To disobey God in the process of obeying government would be to lose His blessin
gs and to lose our salvation and be condemned to inhabit hell eternally. If goin
g to hell cannot be described as "harming" us, then government has lost all of i
ts moral authority to govern, because the only purpose for man s existence revea
led in the Bible is to obey God and thereby receive His salvation and escape hel
l:
“Let us hear the conclusion of this whole matter: Fear [respect] God and keep [o
bey] His commandments, for this is man’s all. For God will bring every work into
judgment, including every secret thing, whether good or evil.” [Eccl. 12:13-14,
Bible, NKJV]
If we cannot act on our beliefs and what we understand that God has ordered us t
o do and if we are prohibited by government from obeying God s commandments, the
n our faith cannot be perfected, and therefore it is dead faith, which is no fai
th at all.
"But whoever keeps [obeys] His word [and commands], truly the love of God is per
fected in him. By this we know that we are in Him." [1 John 2:5, Bible, NKJV]
Thus also faith by itself if it does not have works, is dead. But someone will s
ay, "You have faith, and I have works." Show me your faith without your works, a
nd I will show you my faith by my works.
You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe--and tre
mble! But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?
Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on t
he altar?
Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith wa
s made perfect? And the Scripture was fulfilled which says, "Abraham believed Go
d, and it was accounted to him for righteousness." And he was called the friend
of God.
You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only. Likewise,
was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received messengers an
d sent them out another way? For as the body without the spirit is dead, so fait
h without works is dead also. [James 2:17-26, Bible, NKJV]
We want to see you blessed, but perhaps that blessing may come in a form you wer
en t expecting.
"The proud have forged a lie against me, but I will keep Your precepts with my w
hole heart. Their heart is as fat as grease, but I delight in Your law. It is go
od for me that I have been afflicted, that I may learn Your statutes. The law of
Your mouth is better to me than thousands of coins of gold and silver." [Psalms
119:69-72, Bible, NKJV]
___________________________________________
"My brethren, count it all joy when you fall into various trials, knowing that t
he testing of your faith produces patience. But let patience have its perfect wo
rk, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking nothing." [James 1:2-4, Bible,
NKJV]
___________________________________________
"If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross
, and follow Me. 25For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoeve
r loses his life for My sake will find it. 26For what profit is it to a man if h
e gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exch
ange for his soul? 27For the Son of Man will come in the glory of His Father wit
h His angels, and then He will reward each according to his works." [Matt. 16:24
-27, Bible, NKJV]
___________________________________________
"Blessed are you poor, for yours is the kingdom of God." [Luke 6:20, Bible, NKJV
]
___________________________________________
"Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy an
d where thieves [the IRS] break in and steal; but lay up for yourselves treasure
s in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break
in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also." [Matt
. 6:19-21, Bible, NKJV]
___________________________________________
"If you [a rich man] want to be perfect, go, sell what you have and give to the
poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me."[Jesus in Matt.
19:21, Bible, NKJV]
God s curses will soon come upon this wicked country for:
· Its rejection of God
· Writing deceitful laws that only lawyers and judges are allowed to interpret,
thus transforming us into a society of men and not law. The "judge-made law" and
"extortion under the color of law" that results are in strict violation of God
s laws and ought to be defiantly disobeyed by those who fear, respect, and obey
God s commandments everywhere.
· The horrible deceit, treachery, hypocrisy, greed, and atheism of its political
leaders.
· The violations of due process and persecution of "nontaxpayers" in it courts o
f INjustice by federal judges who have a clear conflict of interest.
· Compelling its citizens to come under federal jurisdiction by putting the Mark
of the Beast on them, the Slave Surveillance Number (SSN)
· Deceiving Americans in the states into thinking they are subject to federal ju
risdiction by obfuscating the terms on citizenship and refusing to acknowledge t
he correct application of the law in this area
· For not providing a way for people to function in society without connecting t
o the government matrix. For instance, for not providing TWO separate number sys
tems, one for those who want to join Socialist Security and one for those who DO
N T but need some form of PRIVATE ID not controlled by the government. The Socia
list Security Number should be administered by the government and the Private ID
Number should be administered privately and not accessible to the government.
· For punishing and persecuting those who want to take responsibility for themse
lves and get the government out of their lives by disconnecting from the governm
ent matrix. Persecuting those who don t want to participate in Socialist Securit
y, don t want to have Slave Surveillance Numbers, by not allowing them to get jo
bs and effectively blacklisting them because of the illegal terrorism of employe
rs by IRS to coerce private workers to join the corrupt system. Any society that
punishes such personal responsibility and rewards irresponsibility and the resu
lting growth of the government cancer is DOOMED to destruction!
· For not giving people a way to separate their private lives from a deceitful a
nd wicked band of criminals and thieves who have created a de facto government i
n violation of our Constitution, and which rapes and pillages and enslaves its c
itizens to pay for public debts that the bible says are NOT AUTHORIZED and are a
SIN.
Here is what will befall this dreadful country, direct from God himself. No judg
e can deny that this result WILL HARM the people both collectively and individua
lly:
"Run to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem; See now and know; And seek in
her open places If you can find a man, If there is anyone who executes judgment,
Who seeks the truth, And I will pardon her. Though they say, "As the LORD lives
, Surely they swear falsely."
O LORD, are not Your eyes on the truth? You have stricken them [with terrorism f
rom afar], But they have not grieved; You have consumed them, But they have refu
sed to receive correction [or to act on the truth of their misdeeds]. They have
made their faces harder than rock; They have refused to return [to Your ways].
Therefore I said, "Surely these are poor. They are foolish; For they do not know
the way of the LORD, The judgment of their God. I will go to the great men and
speak to them, For they have known the way of the LORD, The judgment of their Go
d."
But these [rebellious, lying, greedy people] have altogether broken the yoke And
burst the bonds [of law and decency and morality]. Therefore a lion from the fo
rest shall slay them, A wolf of the deserts shall destroy them; A leopard will w
atch over their cities. Everyone who goes out from there shall be torn in pieces
, Because their transgressions are many; Their backslidings have increased.
"How shall I pardon you for this [your passivity and neglect is inexcusable!]? Y
our children have forsaken Me And sworn by those [in government] that are not go
ds [on a tax return, the perjury statement is an oath]. When I had fed them to t
he full, Then they committed adultery [and homosexuality, and fornication, and i
nternet porn overflowing]And assembled themselves by troops in the harlots hous
es [in Washington D.C. All "taxpayers" are virtual inhabitants of Washington D.C
. under 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(39)]. They were like well-fed lusty stallions; Every o
ne neighed after his neighbor s wife [sexual perversion]. Shall I not punish the
m for these things?" says the LORD. "And shall I not avenge Myself on such a nat
ion as this?”
"Go up on her walls and destroy, But do not make a complete end. Take away her b
ranches, For they are not the LORD s. For the house of Israel and the house of J
udah Have dealt very treacherously with Me," says the LORD.
They have lied about the LORD, And said, "It is not He. Neither will evil come u
pon us, Nor shall we see sword or famine. And the prophets become wind, For the
word is not in them. Thus shall it be done to them."
Therefore thus says the LORD God of hosts:
"Because you speak this word, Behold, I will make My words in your mouth fire, A
nd this people wood, And it shall devour them. Behold, I will bring a nation [of
harlots and lawyers, Babylon the Great Harlot, in the District of Criminals, Wa
shington D.C.] against you from afar, O house of Israel," says the LORD. "It is
a mighty nation, It is an ancient nation [of liars, thieves, and Pharisees] , A
nation whose language [legalese] you do not know, Nor can you understand what th
ey say [in their deliberately deceitful laws]. Their quiver is like an open tomb
; They are all mighty [educated but slanderous] men. And they [and the IRS and l
ying thieving lawyers and judges, their henchmen] shall eat up your harvest and
your bread, Which your sons and daughters should eat. They shall eat up your flo
cks and your herds; They shall eat up your vines and your fig trees; They shall
destroy your fortified cities, In which you trust, with the sword.
"Nevertheless in those days," says the LORD, "I will not make a complete end of
you. 19And it will be when you say, "Why does the LORD our God do all these thin
gs to us? then you shall answer them, "Just as you have forsaken Me and served
foreign gods in your land, so you shall serve aliens in a land that is not yours
.
"Declare this in the house of Jacob And proclaim it in Judah, saying, "Hear this
now, O foolish people, Without understanding [ignorant of your plight], Who hav
e eyes and see not, And who have ears and hear not: Do you not fear Me? says th
e LORD. "Will you not tremble at My presence, Who have placed the sand as the bo
und of the sea, By a perpetual decree, that it cannot pass beyond it? And though
its waves toss to and fro, Yet they cannot prevail; Though they roar, yet they
cannot pass over it. But this people has a defiant and rebellious [and irrespons
ible and wicked] heart; They have revolted and departed [from my laws and comman
dments in the Bible]. They do not say in their heart, "Let us now fear [respect
and obey] the LORD our God, Who gives rain, both the former and the latter, in i
ts season. He reserves for us the appointed weeks of the harvest." Your iniquiti
es have turned these things away, And your sins have withheld [MUCH] good from y
ou.
"For among My people are found wicked men [the IRS, federal reserve, lawyers, ju
dges with conflicts of interest, and politicians]; They lie in wait as one who s
ets snares; They set a trap [in federal district court, which is now part of the
executive branch]; They catch men [in a cage made from vague laws that can only
be understood by a judge, creating due process violations]. As a cage is full o
f birds, So their houses are full of deceit [IRS publications and law books and
government propaganda, all of which the courts and the IRS say you can t trust].
Therefore they have become great and grown rich [from plundering YOUR money ill
egally]. They have grown fat, they are sleek; Yes, they surpass the deeds of the
wicked; They do not plead the cause, The cause of the fatherless [or the NONTAX
PAYER]; Yet they prosper, And the right of the needy they do not defend. Shall I
not punish [HARM!] them for these things? says the LORD. "Shall I not avenge M
yself on such a nation as this?
"An astonishing and horrible thing Has been committed in the land: The prophets
[the lawyers in this case, who are "deacons" for the chief priest, the judges, w
here the government is the new GOD] prophesy falsely, And the priests [judges] r
ule by their own power [and compel worship of the new political religion called
"socialism" and "humanism"]; And My people love to have it so. But what will you
do in the end?” [Jeremiah 5, Bible, NKJV, Emphasis added]
To deny the above message and the "harm" it describes is literally to deny the e
xistence of God, which NO COURT has authority to do under the First Amendment:
The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt, They have d
one abominable works, There is none who does good. [Psalms 14:1, Bible, NKJV]
Anyone who says they have been "hurt" more by following teachings than by not fo
llowing them is admitting that:
1. They don t understand what the consequences of sin and disobedience to God or
His laws is that will result from not fighting the Beast (the corrupted politic
al establishment) and the number of the Beast. See: Deuteronomy 27:11-26, Deuter
onomy 28:15-68 for details.
2. Their definition of "hurt" does not include what happens after they die and r
ejoin their Creator, which means they are atheists. Atheists aren t allowed to u
se our teachings.
3. They care more about temporarily having earthly money and security than they
do about eternal salvation and obeying God s laws, and we say repeatedly through
out our ministry that people who do not believe in God and put obedience to His
laws FIRST, should not be using or listening to our teachings to begin with.
4. They have refused to take personal responsibility for their actions. These ty
pes of people are not authorized to use our teachings either, because we only wa
nt people using these teachings who will take personal responsibility for themse
lves and who do not depend on government or the legal profession for anything, a
nd especially not for protecting them from their own stupidity and indiscretion.
5. They are volunteering for civil liability by making themselves personally res
ponsible to pay our legal fees and damages if they submit evidence to any govern
ment that might indicate that they were harmed or mislead by our ministry.
The government may not interfere with our right to contract under Article 1, Sec
tion 10 of the Constitution, and our documents are Contracts that all who use th
is website agree to unconditionally accept and abide by in consideration of the
valuable copyrighted information they can then obtain here for free.
Lastly, if you decide to get cute and pursue an injunction from a tyrant judge w
ho is willing to exceed his jurisdiction, violate our First Amendment rights, an
d commit Treason against the Constitution, then be advised that this Congregatio
n is not located anywhere inside the United States (the country), and therefore
is outside of your corrupt jurisdiction. You can t stop free speech and we will
NOT be silenced.
Pursuant to Exodus 20:16 (Holy Bible, NKJV), and in accord with 28 USC 1746(1),
executed “without the United States”, I affirm under penalty of perjury under th
e laws of the united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct to
the best of my belief and informed knowledge.
Basadar Qadar-shar®
Ambassador/Diplomat, Priest, Judge
- All Rights Reserved, Without Prejudice, Under Protest
In this Seventeenth Day of May in the year of Our Lord and Saviour, King Yhwhshi
(Jesus) the Christ, Two-Thousand Seven*
http://defendconstitution.blogspot.com/