Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#366 COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Monday, March 06, 2017 3:37:14 PM
Last Modified: Monday, March 06, 2017 4:09:55 PM
Time Spent: 00:32:41
IP Address: 216.54.92.22

PAGE 1: Placement Information

Q1: Student Teacher's Name Hannah Hopper

Q2: Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Elementary Education, PreK-6

Q3: Grade Taught Third Grade

Q4: Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/09/2017

Q5: Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/03/2017

Q6: School of Student Teaching Placement Malibu Elementary

Q7: School Division Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8: Evaluator's Name (First Last) Cheryl Gould

Q9: Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.
Email Address: chergou@regent.edu

Q10: Evaluator's Position/Role University Supervisor

Q11: What time period is this evaluation for? Final

PAGE 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject Superior
area(s) taught.

Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the Superior

age group.

Integrates key content elements and facilitates students Superior

use of higher level thinking skills.

Links content with other subject areas and real world Proficient
applications.

Q13: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.
Hannah has a sound foundation of content knowledge to teach elementary school children. She is a bright young
professional who provides accurate instruction. She is adept at learning new instructional methods and strategies.

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

PAGE 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Aligns lesson objectives to the schools curriculum and Exemplary
student learning needs.

Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner Superior

needs; adapts plans as needed.

Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Superior

transitions.

Plans for differentiated instruction. Superior

Q15: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.
This is an area of strength for Hannah. Her lesson planning skills have been high-quality and consistent from the
beginning of student teaching. She has put in the hard work to write student-centered and thoughtful lessons. These set
the foundation for effective instruction. She consistently plans for all elements of instruction including assessment and
differentiation of instruction. To earn an exemplary, she may want to point out some of the creative and innovative ideas
she has planned for her students.

PAGE 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

Q16: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Engages and maintains students in active learning. Superior

Differentiates instruction to meet the students needs. Exemplary

Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Superior

Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and Superior

resources.

Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Proficient

Q17: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.
Hannah has learned some excellent reading strategies during her first student teaching placement (ie. study sort,
chunk, chunk-blend, high frequency sentences, and concrete learning strategies for lower-level students). She provided
effective instruction, redirection, and kept students on target for learning. It may seem contrary that I rated "differentiates
instruction" in this section as exemplary, even though I rated a similar item in the previous section as superior. In this
case, I have observed her use excellent differentiation strategies in an exemplary way, but were a resource provided by
the reading specialist rather than being created by Hannah. Exceptional use of the resource.

PAGE 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q18: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Superior

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Superior

instruments

Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Superior

purposes.

Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Proficient

Q19: Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student
learning.
Hannah has consistently met this standard during her first placement. She used student learning data to form small-
groups for reading instruction.

PAGE 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Superior
procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.

Uses available resources and knowledge of students to Superior

prevent, redirect, or reinforce behaviors.

Respects students diversity, including language, culture, Superior

race, gender, and special needs.

Actively listens and pays attention to students needs and Superior

responses.

Q21: Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive
to learning.
Hannah provides a "no-nonsense" classroom management style. She is adept at redirecting students in a positive way,
telling them what she wants the "to do" rather than what she doesn't want them to do. She is firm but fair.

PAGE 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Modifies performance based on personal and professional Superior
critiques.

Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Superior

professional interactions.

Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration Proficient

with teachers and other school personnel.

Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and Exemplary

ethical interactions.

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q23: Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.
Hannah is a fine young educator. She has the highest ethical values and integrity. She strives for excellence in all that
she does. She will grow in confidence as a junior member of our profession and realize that she has a great deal to give
to the educational community. She will be an asset to her future hiring school.

PAGE 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24: Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.
Documents the progress of each student throughout the Proficient
placement.

Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Proficient

Uses available data to document/communicate student Proficient

progress and develop learning targets.

Q25: Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.
Hannah is progressing nicely and continues to grow in this area. She has learned the importance of gathering,
documenting, communicating, and using student learning data to make instructional decisions.

4/4