Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Designers:
Contractors:
Melinda Mees (19179342), Nian Hui Ooi (19074858) and Syifa Fazwin (19148672)
4.3.2 Communication............................................................................................................... 16
210 60
20 20
15
24
20
93
27
46,5
40
STAR
JOB TITLE: DRAWING TITLE: ENGINEERING DWG No 1
Mars Lander/Rover
A4 SCALE - 1:2 (mm) Revision No 2
Rover Side View DATE - 26/03/17
250
100
20
90
STAR
JOB TITLE: DRAWING TITLE: ENGINEERING DWG No 2
Mars Lander/Rover
A4 SCALE - 1:1 (mm) Revision No 2
Rover Front/Back View DATE - 26/03/17
116
20
52 5
28 6
62
Key:
2 1- Axle Nut
2- Inner Axle
3- Outer Axle
4- Main Body
20 5- Wheels
6- Strapping
STAR
JOB TITLE: DRAWING TITLE: ENGINEERING DWG No 3
Mars Lander/Rover
A4 SCALE - 1:2 (mm) Revision No 2
Rover Top View DATE - 26/03/17
250
4
Key:
1- Main Body
2- Wheels
3- Strapping
4- Inner Axle
STAR
JOB TITLE: DRAWING TITLE: ENGINEERING DWG No 4
Mars Lander/Rover
A4 SCALE - 1:2 (mm) Revision No 2
Rover Bottom View DATE - 26/03/17
STAR
JOB TITLE: DRAWING TITLE: ENGINEERING DWG No 5
Mars Lander/Rover
A4 SCALE - 1:2 Revision No 2
Rover Isometric View DATE - 26/03/17
60 210
40
70
2
28
3
330
Key:
1- Cavity
2- Cavity Arc (110mm)
3- Axle Hole
STAR
JOB TITLE: DRAWING TITLE: ENGINEERING DWG No 6
Mars Lander/Rover
A4 SCALE - 1:2 (mm) Revision No 2
Rover Main Body Top View (Without Velcro) DATE - 26/03/17
250
100
20 1
27
125
Key:
1- Outer Axle
2- Inner Axle
STAR
JOB TITLE: DRAWING TITLE: ENGINEERING DWG No 7
Mars Lander/Rover
A4 SCALE - 1:1 (mm) Revision No 2
Axle Top View (Inner and Outer Axles) DATE - 26/03/17
STAR
JOB TITLE: DRAWING TITLE: ENGINEERING DWG No 8
Mars Lander/Rover
A4 SCALE - 1:2 Revision No 2
Rover Axle Exploded View DATE - 26/03/17
2.0 Specifications
2.1 Materials
Please note that the costs of the items are based on prices obtained at Bunnings Warehouse stores
and derived from the length or number of particular materials. Note that the advertised dimensions
are those relating to the diameters displayed in description of the products. The actual dimensions
are those measured directly from the materials, sourced from Bunnings Warehouse.
2.3 Procedure
2.3.1 Tools
- Drop/Mitre Saw with an abrasive metal cut-off blade
- Mitre Box and Tenon Saw
- Hand Drill
- Drill Press
- 20mm diameter drill bit
- 28mm diameter drill bit
- Bastard file
- Scissors
- Hacksaw
- Hand Saw
2.3.3 Wheels
- Drill using a drill press with 20mm drill bit at the center of 100mm cap as referred to DWG
No 1. Alternative to the drill press is a hand drill.
- Ensure that the hole drilled is a snug fit for the inner axles (poly irrigation risers) so that the
wheels do not move freely on them.
- Repeat the same for the remaining three wheels.
4.1 Introduction
The purpose of this document is to outline the criteria that will be used to assess the most successful
applicant of the potential manufacturing companies. Below are the specified criteria with the details
and mark allocations following it. The group which successfully achieves the most marks in satisfying
the criteria will be awarded the tender for the manufacture of EMPACTs Mars Lander.
Experience with the use No experience in the use Experience with a few of Has experience with all
of power tools, in of power tools at all. the tools mentioned. the tools mentioned.
particular jigsaw, Can be proved by
bastard file & circular evidence.
saw:
Experience with cutting No experience with Limited experience and/ Adequate experience
Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC): cutting PVC. or experience by with cutting PVC.
observation.
4.3.2 Communication
Easily accessible:
The successful tenderer, throughout the duration of the construction of the Mars Lander, must be
easily accessible to the design company. The most successful tenderer will be the group that will
have a presence on social media and can reply to inquiries within a day. This includes but is not
limited to the use of communicating by email, text messaging, Facebook and meetings. As a result,
any uprising problems, questions and changes to the equipment and methodology raised by the
manufacturers for the designers can be resolved immediately. Teams which do not adhere to this
criterion will not be able to be informed on any changes to parts of the project which can affect the
completion of the project. Regular updates on the progress of the build will be required to inform
Star Engineering and the client to ensure the project will be completed by the deadline to a high
standard.
Group Dynamics:
Communication within the potential manufacturer is crucial to the build of the Mars Lander. Star
Engineering requires the successful tenderer to be in frequent contact with each of their members.
Therefore, when an unplanned emergency arises and a member has not completed their part of the
project, the work of that person can be divided amongst the capable members to compensate.
Unsuccessful communication will result in tension within the group and incomplete prescribed tasks
which will lead to the unsuccessful construction of the Mars Lander.
0 0.5 1
0 0.5 1
Needs to be innovative Unable to supply any Able to supply some Is able to supply
and resourceful in equipment and equipment with limited necessary equipment
challenging events: therefore not eligible for resource skills in finding and has access to any
consideration. an alternative. other alternative
materials throughout
the build if needed.
4.3.4 Competence
Must have an understanding of the basic procedure and how to build:
The tenderer must be able to thoroughly read over the procedure and design specifications. Groups
that familiarise themselves with the unit outline and marking rubrics as well as having background
knowledge on construction will be highly desired as it proves they are competent in building and
following instructions.
0 0.5 1
Must have an Unable to follow basic Some degree of Able to follow complex
understanding of the instructions and has no knowledge on instructions with
basic procedure and background knowledge construction and sufficient background
how to build on constructing or building. Can follow knowledge on
building projects. basic instructions. construction and design.
Must be able to Cannot complete within Can complete the Proven to be highly
complete construction time frame as evidenced project within the competent by
within timeframe: by previous group tasks. timeframe, however familiarising themselves
Therefore not eligible with no time to review with deadlines as
for consideration. and make changes to evidenced by the
any errors. successful completions
of previous group tasks.
Presentation
Weekly progress reports Review
Other EFY CL: ws. as.(oral) FS: Case CL: Mid Sem MC: ws. quiz CL: ws. as. CL: ws. as. MC: ws. quiz CL: Lab as.
Study as. Exam (test) (oral)
MC: Mid Term MC: Lab AS: Test MC: ws. quiz
Exam MC: ws. quiz MC: ws. quiz MC: ws. quiz MC: ws. quiz
WN: Test FS: Essay MC: Lab
MC: ws. quiz AS: Test PR: ws. quiz PR: Mid Sem
Exam WN: Test &
WN: Site visit Report
AS: Skit
Contractors Contingency Handover
Plans Final
Prototype
Ethics activity
Write Tender Application Build Prototype
Designers DPR Response Submission Assessing
Activity Q&A Final
Prototype
Supervise Manufacturing of Prototype
Write Tender Evaluation
KEY: MC- Engineering Mechanics CL- Calculus for Engineers WN- Wine Making & Brewery AS- Communication with Asia
PR- Engineering Programming FS- Intro to Forensic Science ws.- Workshop as.- Assessment