Odds in Court Battles Over Speech Rights: The Authors profile: The author, Peter Schmidt, writes about affirmative action, academic labor, and issues related to academic freedom. Schmidt was involved in the discussion, because he had interest in lawsuits that professors had against their employers regarding their academic freedom of speech. The purpose of this article was to display the low odds that professors have of winning court cases against their employers surrounding their freedom of speech, and his does so through interview as well as graphical representation. The Authors claim and reasons: The main topic of conversation is the freedom of speech on campus. Schmidt argues that previous to the case of Waters v. Churchill, freedom of speech court rulings had to show proof of disruption to normal operations. The author uses Michael LeRoys (a professor of labor and employment at University of Illinois) research of court rulings and the representation of college facultys First Amendment right on campus. The research conducted found that both men and women won at roughly equal rates and that most of the cases that won had to do with campus critics. The Audience for the article: The intended audience may include individuals that have encounter court rulings or issues with freedom of speech on campus. In addition, the secondary audience could include individuals who are researching or wanting to know more about the setbacks of freedom of speech on a college campus. The genre and conventions of the article: The genre of this article is an informative political article. The conventions of this genre have to do with bringing up political issues, making a stance on that political issue, and a reasoning behind why it is the way that it is, with evidence to support that reasoning. . Other existing perspectives on the issue: Article consisted of facts and it is pretty hard to refute the facts that are represented
Key Words: Speech Rights College Lawsuits First Amendment Protections Academic Freedom Team 3
Gender- depends on class and college, gender representation- nursing-more women, engineering-more men Segregation- groups/fraternities that are on campus that serve to provide a place for minority students to congregate, more self-segregation that doesnt force minority groups to exist 2 articles that discuss technology in the classroom-flipped classroom and wasting time on the internet class Underfunding of community colleges, focus on other more profiting expenditures like online classes