Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Brianna Bush
Abstract
Violence in America's schools is not a new issue. As far back as 1927, violence has found its way
into the country's schools by way of bombs, knives, fights, and guns. But not just in the US,
though. School violence, while undoubtedly more frequent in America, is not unique. All
industrialized countries experience violence in their schools. The reasons why are beyond the
scope of this paper but perhaps looking more closely at the media's coverage and the public's
reaction could lend perspective to why this issue is more prevalent in the United States.
3
Violence in America's Schools
Whenever a big story hits the airwaves, whether it be a shooting at a school, a nightclub,
or a workplace, it seems that the same group of people get facetime on the national news outlets.
The National Rifle Association condemns the violent act while reaffirming their firm support of
responsible gun ownership. The Brady Campaign or Moms Demand Action call for stricter gun
legislation and tighter school security measures. Democrat politicians call for universal
background checks and banning "assault rifles" while their Republican counterparts point to the
Constitution's 2nd Amendment. Of course, as we all know, none of these groups alone have been
able to stop school violence, of which gun violence is their primary focus, but they get the
chance to nationally promote their own agenda and fill their coffers from their already ardent
supporters' wallets.
It appears, though, that these political actors talk past one another to the point of
absurdity; offering "solutions" that just plain don't even address the issue. One example is the
security upgrades that millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on. Bulletproof whiteboards
and clipboards may help to stop a bullet from hitting a person, but what it cannot do is stop the
person firing the gun from ever getting to the point where they are, mentally or otherwise. The
450 bills proposed by state lawmakers in the wake of Sandy Hook is another example of
misplaced focus: Universal background checks, mental health exclusions, banning certain types
of guns or ammunition none of these tactics would have stopped Columbine, Virginia Tech, or
Sandy Hook. The fact has always been and will always be that legislation doesn't keep criminals
from breaking the law. It just makes criminals out of otherwise law-abiding citizens. Those "gun
free zone" signs don't magically prevent guns from entering; they don't seem to even deter. In
4
Violence in America's Schools
fact, one could argue that the least safe places are those where there are no armed defenders;
While there is no panacea for ending violence in our nation's schools, this author believes
that there are steps that can be taken to achieve, or at least, approach, such a lofty goal. One of
those steps focuses on not being reactive to these tragedies and trying to "play catch-up" in their
wake, but being proactive in our approach. Leaving aside the various pros and cons, the National
intervene after the fact when we can prevent these tragedies from occurring in the first place or,
absent a utopian view of the world, drastically reduce them? Instead, we enact zero-tolerance
policies that lead to cases like the recent North Carolina 5-year-old girl being suspended for
playing with her imaginary "stick gun." It seems that zero-tolerance is just another way of saying
zero-common sense. It is this lack of common sense and fear mongering by parties on both sides
of the issue that have done largely nothing to address the issues at hand, instead focusing on
secondary or tertiary issues that, once addressed, leave us no better off. While it is not the
purpose of this paper to offer solutions to the issue, the author would be remiss if it was not
pointed out that, like most things in life, moderation seems to be the best approach to this issue.
Common sense, cool heads, and actually paying attention to what the other side is saying would