Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
SWETHA
211416631140
t - TEST
EX NO:
DATE:
To test the null hypothesis that the means of two populations are equal using t-test.
INPUT DATA:
H 0 : There is no significance difference between the means.
FEMAL
E MALE
26 23
25 30
43 18
34 25
18 28
52
OUTPUT :
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
FEMALE MALE
Mean 33 24.8
Variance 160 21.7
Observations 6 5
Hypothesized Mean
Difference 0
df 7
t Stat 1.47260514
0.09217020
P(T<=t) one-tail 2
1.89457860
t Critical one-tail 5
0.18434040
P(T<=t) two-tail 5
2.36462425
t Critical two-tail 2
CONCLUSION:
D.SWETHA
211416631140
Thus t Stat < t critical two-tail, we accept the null hypothesis. There is no significance difference
between the means.
t - TEST
EX NO:
DATE:
To test the null hypothesis that the mean height of the populations are 66 inches using t-test.
INPUT DATA:
H 0 : There is no significance difference between the means.
PERSO HEIGHT
N S
1 63
2 63
3 66
4 67
5 68
6 69
7 70
8 70
9 71
10 71
OUTPUT :
CONCLUSION:
Thus t Stat < t critical two-tail, we accept the null hypothesis. There is no significance difference
between the means.
F - TEST
EX NO:
DATE:
To test the null hypothesis that the variances of two populations are equal using f-test.
INPUT DATA:
H 0 : There is no significance difference between the variance.
FEMAL
E MALE
26 23
25 30
43 18
34 25
18 28
52
OUTPUT :
F-Test Two-Sample for Variances
FEMALE MALE
Mean 33 24.8
Variance 160 21.7
Observations 6 5
Df 5 4
F 7.373271889
P(F<=f) one-tail 0.037888376
F Critical one-tail 6.256056502
CONCLUSION:
Thus F>F critical one-tail, we reject the null hypothesis. The variances of the two populations are
unequal.
D.SWETHA
211416631140
F - TEST
EX NO:
DATE:
To test the null hypothesis that the population variance differ significantly using f-test.
INPUT DATA:
SAMPLE 1 SAMPLE 2
9 10
11 12
13 10
11 14
15 9
9 8
12 10
14
OUTPUT:
CONCLUSION:
D.SWETHA
211416631140
Thus F<F Critical one tail, we accept the null hypothesis. There is a significant difference
between the variance.
ANOVA
EX NO:
DATE:
1) X
2) at =0.05 level, is there any significant difference between the methods.
INPUT DATA:
H 0 : The means of three methods are not equal.
OUTPUT :
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Averag
Groups Count Sum e Variance
METHOD 1 3 531 177 39
METHOD 2 3 552 184 148
METHOD 3 2 328 164 8
ANOVA
Source of P-
Variation SS df MS F value F crit
481.87 240.93 3.1536 0.1300 5.7861
Between Groups 5 2 8 3 3 4
Within Groups 382 5 76.4
D.SWETHA
211416631140
863.87
Total 5 7
CONCLUSION:
Thus F<F crit, we accept the null hypothesis. The means of the population are not equal.
ANOVA
EX NO:
DATE:
To test the null hypothesis using ANOVA. At the 0.01 level, do the promotions produce different
effects on sales.
INPUT DATA:
H 0 : The promotions does not produce any different effects on sales.
OUTPUT:
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Coun Averag
Groups t Sum e Variance
FREE SAMPLE 5 420 84 20
ONE-PACK GIFT 5 450 90 7.5
CENTS OFF 5 379 75.8 27.7
REFUND BY MAIL 5 390 78 29
ANOVA
D.SWETHA
211416631140
Source of
Variation SS Df MS F P-value F crit
204.0 9.6935 3.2388
Between Groups 612.15 3 5 9 0.0007 7
Within Groups 336.8 16 21.05
Total 948.95 19
CONCLUSION:
Thus F > Fcrit, we reject the null hypothesis. The promotion does not produce different effects
on sales.
DATE:
To determine the descriptive statistics using spss.
INPUT DATA:
VARIABLE VIEW:
DATA VIEW:
D.SWETHA
211416631140
OUTPUT:
Statistics
FREQUENCY
N Valid 10
Missing 0
Mean 8.00
Median 7.50
Mode 2a
Sum 80
FREQUENCY
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
DATE:
To determine the descriptive statistics using spss.
INPUT DATA:
VARIABLE VIEW:
DATA VIEW:
D.SWETHA
211416631140
OUTPUT:
Statistics
FREQUENCY
N Valid 10
Missing 0
Mean 60.00
Median 49.00
Mode 4a
Sum 600
FREQUENCY
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent