Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Sp17
Modern Human
Origins (Regional
Continuity and
Replacement)
By
Jensen
Derek Jensen
Many paleoanthropologists have wondered when the first humans started to appear on the
planet, going to great lengths in discovering the answer to this mystery. Most of their theories
are summarized into two different takes of modern human organs, the first being the replacement
theory and the second The Regional Continuity Model Multi Evolution. For one of the two
The Replacement Theory claims that modern humans originated from Africa and
dispersed to other parts of the world. As modern humans spread across the world, they
interbreed with other hominins mostly in Europe and Asia, replacing them in the process.
Neanderthals share some common alleles, which some theorist believe that this is proof that they
interbreed with one another. African humans do not share as many alleles compared to the Non-
African humans. (Sankararaman, The Date of Interbreeding between Neandertals and Modern
Humans, 2012)
Playing devils advocate one may conclude that an earlier ancestor of the human and
Neanderthals actually left Africa and evolved into humans and Neanderthals, with the latter
becoming extinct. On the other hand, one would argue that this is not the case because when
Page | 1
Jensen
both species appear on the fossil record show otherwise. Modern humans showed up on the
fossil record around 200,000 years ago and has is still thriving today. Neanderthals started
showing up on the European fossil record around 230,000 years ago, and disappeared 30,000
years ago. (Sankararaman, The Date of Interbreeding between Neandertals and Modern
Humans, 2012) The first European human settlers appeared in Europe around 40,000 years,
which are 10,000 before the Neanderthals disappeared from the fossil record. From the time it
took the modern human to show up in Europe and is enough time for them meet up with the
Neanderthal communities had interbreed with them, which caused them to disappear.
The regional Continuity Model Multi Evolution (also known as The Regional Continuity
Theory) states that from the time many hominins left Africa, different populations migrated
throughout the world and through natural selection, evolved into the humans that we are today.
With different hominins, evolving into humans in different parts of the world would be one way
of explaining why there is a different variation amongst the Homo sapiens line. (TakahataL, N.
(2001). Testing Multiregionality of Modern Human Origins. Molecular Biology and Evolution).
To explore how this is possible one must understand the process of Natural selection.
Natural Selection occurs, when a species is able to survive their environment, because
they possess a trait that is more is more favorable, and have a higher production rate. One
example of how natural selection works in nature are insects. Many insects are able to endure
insecticides that farmers use. The insects that are able to survive these insecticides go on to
reproduce passing down there favorable traits to new insects, until the farmer finds a new
Page | 2
Jensen
insecticide causing Natural Selection to favor a new favorable traits. (Futuyma, D. (2004).
This ties into the regional Continuity Model Multi Evolution, because many hominins
could have evolved into humans and with different characteristics that gave them the advantage
in their environments. For example some humans may have been shorter and stockier to support
colder climates, compared to other humans who are taller and leaner to support warmer climates.
The question where did the modern human being originate from is one that cannot be
answered by the regonal continuity model multi evolution model or the replacement theory with
out proofing the other wrong. One theory says humans orginated from Africa, and replaced other
hominds throughout the world, and the regonal continuity model multi evolution theory states
that humans did not appear just from Africa, but evovled through different times across the
world. The question boils down to did human evolution take place in multiple areas across the
world or did it happen in Africa and later branched out across the world?
I would argue that The Replacement theory is correct. The reason being is that humans
had to evovle to a point were they already had characterstics that make us who we are. With the
Replacement model, human beings could still experience the effects of Natural Selection,
passing down traits that are more favorable to survive certain envoirments and still interbreed
We could also argue that from the time it took Neanderthals to show up on the fossil
record around 200000 years ago and from when they dispeared from the fossil record 30,000
years ago, compared to when the first humans appeared on the fossile record around 40,000
years ago in the European continent, that interbreed occurred, assimalting the Neanderthals into
Page | 3
Jensen
the human race. There is a 10,000 year gap that humans and Neanderthals would have to
discover each other and interact. If Natural selection did occurre, more human characterstics
On the other side of this argument humans may have evolved around the same time of
Neanderthals in the same areas, but did not interbreed. For this theory to work humans would
have to evolve many of thousands of years after the Neanderthals. A counter to that argument is
that humans evovled in Africa and migrated to other places in other places in the world not just
Europe.
The first humans burial sites appeared in Australlia around 50000 years ago. (Mayell, H.
(2003). First Humans in Australia Dated to 50,000 years ago. The first humans discovered in
Australlia were discovered in 1969 around lake Mango. The Mango man and Mango lady were
to belived to be buried around 40,000 years ago. In 1999 scientist mitochrondrial DNA from the
bones of the Mango MAnd, and came to the conculsion that the Mango Man and Women were
over 60,000 years old.Many sceintist argue this fact the first humans appeared in Australlia more
than 60,000 years ago, but the fact remains we have gentic proof of humans appearing around
40,000 60,000 years ago.(Mayell, H. (2003). First Humans in Australia Dated to 50,000 years
Australian settlers would have appeared around 20,000 -10,000 years before the
European settlers. Which means that for the regional continuity theory to be correct humans
would have to evolve at different times across the world. This begs the question how long did it
take for the first human to evovle into the human species. Macro evolution can take more than a
Page | 4
Jensen
The time that humans to make their apperance across the world seems to short for
evolution to take its full effect. This is why the replacement theory makes more sense. As
humans travelled outide of Africa depending on where they migirated they adapted to their
enviroments, and interbreeding with other hominin creating different physical and bilogical
variations.
E portfolio
http://derekwjensen.weebly.com/
Works Cited
(Jurmain, R. Essentials of Physical Anthropology, Page 287-288)
(https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/migratory-crossings/)
Mayell, H. (2003). First Humans in Australia Dated to 50,000 years ago. National
Geographic, 2.
Page | 5