Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Brianna L. Stemmler
Introduction
Individuals who rely on wheelchairs for mobility and to aid in the completion of activities
of daily living (ADL) typically face adverse effects as a result of prolonged sitting (Goda, Hatta,
Kishigami, Suzuki, & Ikeda, 2015). Wheelchairs are intended to enable mobility and promote
poor skin integrity, swallowing and respiratory complications, pain or discomfort, and restricted
mobility (Gavin-Dreschnack, 2004). Occupational therapists (OTs) suggest the use of seat
Literature Review
impaired mobility. Wheelchairs serve as a way for individuals to be independent, despite their
condition or disease. Walker et al. (2010) suggests that 6.8 million individuals in the United
States use assistive devices to assist with mobility on a daily basis. Assistive devices include
wheelchairs, scooters, canes, crutches and walkers (Walker et al., 2010). Kaye, Kang, & LaPlante
(2000) suggest that wheelchairs and scooters are most commonly used by individuals who report
the inability to engage in one or more major life activities. Evidence suggests that mobility
devices, including wheelchairs, have a positive effect on participation in daily life (Kaye et al.,
2000). When wheelchairs are properly adjusted, they can provide spinal stabilization and
substitute for weak trunk musculature during static sitting and some functional activities
(Hastings, Fanucchi, & Burns, 2003, p.530). Additionally, individuals that are properly trained
on wheelchair usage are more likely to overcome physical barriers in their environment,
LITERATURE REVIEW 3
experience feelings of independence, and an overall better quality of life (QoL) (Kilkens,
Individuals who use wheelchairs for mobility often remain seated for prolonged periods
of time, which could have negative implications for the individual. If the wheelchair is used
poor skin integrity, decreased QoL, and a need for assistance during occupations (Trefler,
Fitzgerald, Hobson, Bursick, & Joseph, 2004). The variables mentioned above need to be taken
into consideration when wheelchair bound individuals are prescribed wheelchairs to better
Postural deformities in the spine are often a result of poor seated posture (Requejo,
Furumasu, & Mulroy, 2015). Two common spinal deformities that impact spinal alignment are
kyphosis and scoliosis. These deformities cause pain in the lumbar region of the spine, which
makes it difficult for wheelchair users to breathe properly, engage in feeding and eating, and
participate in ADLs (Allam & Schwabe, 2013). Also, they can cause the arms to become uneven
and self-propulsion of the wheelchair becomes difficult (Allam & Schwabe, 2013). Adversely,
wheelchair bound individuals may require the assistance of others to engage in their occupations.
In addition to spinal deformities, poor seated posture can also cause in poor skin integrity.
Poor skin integrity often results in pressure ulcers, especially in the elderly population. Pressure
ulcers form when pressure or force is placed on the tissues of the body in varying magnitudes
and durations for prolonged periods of time (Sonenblu & Springle 2011). When seated, nearly
half of the body weight is supported by only 8 percent of the seated areas at or near the ischial
tuberosities (Collins, 1999, p. 50), making that area most susceptible to pressure ulcers. Requejo
LITERATURE REVIEW 4
et al. (2015) suggests pelvic tilt and poor seated posture has an influence on the development of
pressure ulcers in wheelchair bound persons. Specifically, Requejo et al. (2015) states that a
slouched posture in a wheelchair causes a pelvic tilt, limits mobility, decreases upper extremity
range of motion needed for repositioning, and results in shearing pressure ulcers. Adversely,
individuals experience difficulties attending to ADLS such as positioning and transferring and
maintenance of hygiene, thereby affecting quality of life (Requejo et al., 2015, p. 4).
Pain and discomfort is a major concern for wheelchair users due to their dependence on
the upper extremities for activities of daily life such as wheelchair propulsion, personal care,
dressing, and transfers (Will et al., 2015, p. 1). Research suggests poor seated posture is a
predictor of pain in the upper extremity and back (Hastings et al., 2003). Forward head posture
(FHP) is one of the primary positions seen in wheelchair bound individuals with upper extremity
musculoskeletal disorders. FHP is characterized by seated posture with a protracted neck and
head making it difficult to engage in ADLs and increases the risk of aspiration during eating
(Goda et al., 2015). To decrease the pain caused by FHP and other incorrect postures, wheelchair
users attempt to reposition themselves. Repositioning becomes difficult because once incorrect
posture develops it becomes difficult to maintain a functional, erect position (Goda et al., 2015).
stress and strain on the body (Yip, Chiu, & Poon, 2008, p. 149). Hastings et al. (2003) states
that sitting is not a normative position for locomotion, therefore, it is difficult to determine an
ideal sitting posture. Sitting is typically considered a transitional period or a position of rest, not
a position of movement and interaction with the environment. Recent research concludes that a
sitting posture with an anterior pelvic tilt and decreased lumbar flexion is the more favorable
LITERATURE REVIEW 5
position (Hastings et al., 2003, p. 532). Current guidelines for correct seated posture involve the
ischial tuberosities of the pelvis evenly supporting the weight of the upper body. The pelvis
should be slightly anteriorly tilted to relieve pressure off the body prominences on the pelvis and
allow the hip, knee and ankle joints to rest in 90 of flexion. Feet should lie flat on the floor so
they can adequately support 19% of the body weight (Collins, 1999). Lin et al. (2006) suggest
that upright seated positioning in wheelchairs has a positive effect on respiration, feeding and
who are wheelchair bound are frequently repositioned to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers. If
they are unable to reposition themselves, care givers should reposition them at least once every
two hours (Reddy, Gill, & Rochon, 2006). In addition to repositioning, the use of therapeutic
positioning has proven to decrease or limit the progression pressure ulcers (Nixon et al., 2006).
Therapeutic positioning involves the use of therapeutic surfaces that lower the interface pressure
between the body and the wheelchair, which is the supporting surface. The most common
therapeutic surfaces are foam, air, or gel cushions (Thorne, Sauve, Yacoub, & Guitard, 2009).
requires a person to impart a force to the wheelchair push rim to move forward. As a result, the
joints of the upper limb are loaded repeatedly as the manual wheelchair user engages in their
occupations (Collinger et al., 2008 p. 667). Clinicians working with wheelchair bound
individuals must educate them on the importance of proper biomechanics during propulsion.
LITERATURE REVIEW 6
Wheelchair propulsion is separated into two phases, the push phase and the recovery
phase. The push phase occurs when the hands come in contact with the rims and produce a force
to propel the wheelchair. The recovery phase is the nonpropulsive phase where the hands are
preparing to restart the push phase (Vanlandewijck, Theisen, & Daly, 2001). To ensure that
wheelchair propulsion is complete and effective, it is important to note the individuals position
relative to the axle and seated posture. Research suggests that seat height has an impact on
mechanical efficiency, energy consumption, hand, arm and trunk range of motion and push phase
duration (Kotajarvi, Sabick, An, & Zhao, 2004). Kotajarvi et al. (2004) summarizes that
distance between the shoulder joint and wheelchair axel. To maximize benefits, wheelchair users
could be provided with an adjustable axel position to further improve propulsion biomechanics
and reduce the risk of musculoskeletal complications (Kotajarvi et al., 2004). In conclusion,
research suggests that wheelchair bound individuals who are able to manually proper their
wheelchair are more likely to participate in their occupations and have an overall better QoL
Conclusion
mobility (Walker et al., 2010). Wheelchair bound individuals are at risk of facing a variety of
preventable complications as a result of prolonged sitting (Goda et al., 2015). Correct seated
posture is believed to have a positive effect on the overall health, well-being and QoL for
individuals who are wheelchair bound (Lin et al., 2006). Occupational therapy aims to promote
provision of correct seated positioning for those individuals (Walker et al., 2010).
LITERATURE REVIEW 7
References
Allam, A. M., & Schwabe, A. L. (2013). Neuromuscular scoliosis. Physical Medicine and
Barks, L., Luther, S. L., Brown, L. M., Schulz, B., Bowen, M. E., & Powell-Cope, G. (2015).
Development and initial validation of the Seated Posture Scale. Journal of Rehabilitation
Claus, A. P., Hides, J. A., Moseley, G. L., & Hodges, P. W. (2009). Is idealsitting posture
real?: Measurement of spinal curves in four sitting postures. Manual Therapy, 14(4), 404-
408.
Collins, F (1999). Preventing pressure sores in the seated patient. Nursing Standard, 13 (42), 50-
54.
Collinger, J. L., Boninger, M. L., Koontz, A. M., Price, R., Sisto, S. A., Tolerico, M. L., &
Goda, H., Hatta, T., Kishigami, H., Suzuki, A., & Ikeda, T. (2015). Does a novel-developed
Hastings, J.D., Fanucchi, E. R., & Burns, S. P. (2003) Wheelchair configuration and postural
alignment in persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and
Kaye, H. S., Kang, T., & LaPlante, M. P. (2000). Mobility device use in the United States, No.
14. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research.
Kilkens, O. J., Dallmeijer, A. J., De Witte, L. P., Van Der Woude, L. H., & Post, M. W. (2004).
The wheelchair circuit: Construct validity and responsiveness of a test to assess manual
wheelchair mobility in persons with spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine
Kim, W. J., & Chang, M. (2013). A comparison of the average sitting pressures and symmetry
indexes between air-adjustable and foam cushions. Journal of Physical Therapy Science,
25(9), 1185-1187.
Kotajarvi, B. R., Sabick, M. B., An, K. N., & Zhao, K. D. (2004). The effect of seat position on
Lin, F., Parthasarathy, S., Taylor, S. J., Pucci, D., Hendrix, R. W., & Makhsous, M. (2006).
Effect of different sitting postures on lung capacity, expiratory flow, and lumbar
Nixon, J., Cranny, G., Iglesias, C., Nelson, A. E., Hawkins, K., Phillips, A., et al. (2005).
pressure overlays for the prevention of pressure ulcers: PRESSURE (pressure relieving
OSullivan, P. B., Dankaerts, W., Burnett, A. F., Farrell, G. T., Jefford, E., Naylor, C. S., &
curvature and trunk muscle activation in a pain-free population. Spine, 31(19), E707-
E712.
Reeve, A., & Dilley, A. (2009). Effects of posture on the thickness of transversus abdominis in
Reddy, M., Gill, S. S., & Rochon, P. A. (2006). Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review.
Requejo, P. S., Furumasu, J., & Mulroy, S. J. (2015). Evidence-based strategies for preserving
mobility for elderly and aging manual wheelchair users. Topics in Geriatric
Sonenblu, S., & Springle, S. (2011). Assessing evidence supporting redistribution of pressure for
Thorne, S., Sauve, K., Yacoub, C., & Guitard, P. (2009). Evaluating the pressure-reducing
capabilities of the gel pad in supine. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63,
744750.
Trefler, E., Fitzgerald, S. G., Hobson, D. A., Bursick, T., & Joseph, R. (2004). Outcomes of
Vanlandewijck, Y., Theisen, D., & Daly, D. (2001). Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. Sports
Walker, K. A., Morgan, K. A., Morris, C. L., DeGroot, K. K., Hollingsworth, H. H., & Gray, D.
LITERATURE REVIEW 10
B. (2010). Development of a community mobility skills course for people who use
Will, K., Engsberg, J., Foreman, M., Klaesner, J., Birkenmeier, R., & Morgan, K. (2015).
Yip, C. H. T., Chiu, T. T. W., & Poon, A. T. K. (2008). The relationship between head posture
and severity and disability of patients with neck pain. Manual Therapy, 13(2), 148-154.