that simulation results of operating case are in close agreem

/ Hydraulic calculations carried out earlier. This e valves at 100% open conditi
ons with CW Pumps operating at rated
capacities and perform steady state analysis to obtain initial conditions for tr
ansient analysis.
Step 2: Create a transient scenario with simultaneous tripping of Both CW Pumps
instantly. Maintain the
transient conditions for 250 seconds.
The maximum and minimum pressures observed along the pipele valves at 100% open
conditions with CW Pumps operating at rated
capacities and perform steady state analysis to obtain initial conditions for tr
ansient analysis.
Step 2: Create a transient scenario with simultaneous tripping of Both CW Pumps
instantly. Maintain the
transient conditions for 250 seconds.
The maximum and minimum pressures observed along the pipeline profile during tra
nsient runs are
shown in Table 6 and Figure 3. The Pressures downstream of CW Pump, upstreine pr
ofile during transient runs are
shown in Table 6 and Figure 3. The Pressures downstream of CW Pump, upstrevalida
ted simulafferent transient scenarios as stated in Basis section of this rep
LYSIS
ystem has been ce valves at 100% open conditions with CW Pumps operating at rate
d
capacities and perform steady state analysis to obtain initial conditions for tr
ansient analysis.
Step 2: Create a transient scenario with simultaneous tripping of Both CW Pumps
instantly. Maintain the
transient conditions for 250 seconds.
The maximum and minimum pressures observed along the pipeline profile during tra
nsient runs are
shown in Table 6 and Figure 3. The Pressures downstream of CW Pump, upstrearried
out on the steady state conditions as5.1. Following transient scenarios were cr
eated and analyzed-
e leading to stopping of both CW pumps with discharge valves stuck
tripping of both pumps with discharge valves closing linearly.
one pumFlow through each Pump Discharge valve bypass is calculated as 376.5 m
PD2086-PS-REP-A4-01 Rev1
3
/hr which is 1.9% of the
pump flow.
From Table 5 it can be inferred that simulation results of operating case are in
close agreement with the
CW Pump Sizing Calculation/ Hydraulic calculations carried out earlier. This val
idated simulation model
was used for generating the different transient scenarios as stated in Basis sec
tion of this report.
5.2. TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
The transient analysis of the system has been carried out on the steady state co
nditions as reported in
the preceding section Section-5.1. Following transient scenarios were created an
d analyzed-

Flow through each Pump Discharge valve bypass is calculated as 376.5 m

PD2086-PS-REP-A4-01 Rev1
3
/hr which is 1.9% of the
pump flow.
From Table 5 it can be inferred that simulation results of operating case are in
close agreement with the
CW Pump Sizing Calculation/ Hydraulic calculations carried out earlier. This val
idated simulation model
was used for generating the different transient scenarios as stated in Basis sec
tion of this report.
5.2. TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
The transient analysis of the system has been carried out on the steady state co
nditions as reported in
the preceding section Section-5.1. Following transient scenarios were created an
d analyzed-

Flow through each Pump Discharge valve bypass is calculated as 376.5 m

PD2086-PS-REP-A4-01 Rev1
3
/hr which is 1.9% of the
pump flow.
From Table 5 it can be inferred that simulation results of operating case are in
close agreement with the
CW Pump Sizing Calculation/ Hydraulic calculations carried out earlier. This val
idated simulation model
was used for generating the different transient scenarios as stated in Basis sec
tion of this report.
5.2. TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
The transient analysis of the system has been carried out on the steady state co
nditions as reported in
the preceding section Section-5.1. Following transient scenarios were created an
d analyzed-

Case-1, Power Fa
 Case-1, Power Fa

Case-1, Power Fap with its discharge valves closing linearly, the other pumFlow
through each Pump Discharge valve bypass is calculated as 376.5 m
PD2086-PS-REP-A4-01 Rev1
3
/hr which is 1.9% of the
pump flow.
From Table 5 it can be inferred that simulation results of operating case are in
close agreement with the
CW Pump Sizing Calculation/ Hydraulic calculations carried out earlier. This val
idated simulation model
was used for generating the different transient scenarios as stated in Basis sec
tion of this report.
5.2. TRANSIENT ANALYSIS
The transient analysis of the system has been carried out on the steady state co
nditions as reported in
the preceding section Section-5.1. Following transient scenarios were created an
d analyzed-
Case-1, Power Fa