Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ms. Cramer
College Comp- Period 7
3-17-17
The Cost of Free College Tuition in America
"More than 75% of students required to take remedial classes never graduate. Seventy
percent of Americans will study at a 4-year college, but less than 2/3 will graduate. Thirty
percent of college freshman dropout after their first year. Sixty percent of college dropouts had
no help from parents in paying for tuition" (Beckstead). These statistics, which are rather
shocking, would be even more dramatic if college tuition were to be free. There would be
people attending numerous universities who would not be able to handle the vigorous
atmosphere that we like to call college. College tuition should not be free because of the
To begin, in order for college tuition to be priceless, the government would need to pay
the colleges to accept these incoming students. This money would come from the working
Americans' pockets through taxes (Eichen). Therefore, the students that are going to college for
free would have to pay for their college tuition, plus that of millions more of Americans. Bernie
Sanders, during his presidential campaign, suggested that the United States should offer free
tuition. He imposed raising the top income tax from 36% up to 50%, and an increase of 0.5% on
stock trades, 0.1% on bonds and a 0.005% on derivatives. Free college is a thorn in the side of
the American taxpayers1, not only would this be taking money from the rich, college-level
(Luhby). In addition to taking money from Americans through taxes, the new college-education
students would be taking the jobs of those who are already educated.
To add on, the United States should not offer free college tuition because it would harm
the workforce. In The Pros and Cons of Free College, a "credential creep" is mentioned due to
the influx of new college-educated workers. The Americans that already have a degree would
need to go back to college to try to stay ahead of their new competitors, and to try to "stand
out" in their workplace. For example, if an institution employed someone with an associate's
degree, they could be replaced by someone who has the same degree or one that is higher. This
can lead to the current employee going back to college to further their education to compete
with the newcomer. As well as the possible competition, an employer may just release the
employees that have been there for years for the new college-educated adults. This will leave
Americans who have worked their way to the top, to fend for themselves and start over. Also,
the article states that there would be a "flood of graduates with mediocre credentials." With
college tuition being free, there would be many people becoming educated that do not have
the work ethic and determination to thrive in society. This would lead to the workplace
becoming disorganized and underactive. Not only would this hurt the economy, it also degrades
the morals of higher education; a college degree would be nothing more than a high school
diploma (Eichen) If everybody is able to attend college and have the chance at earning a
degree, the value goes down because it is so common. However, everyone being offered the
high school graduates do not go to post-secondary education because of the cost of tuition.
Young adults and even middle-aged individuals do not want to be left with thousands of dollars
in debt. However, as the number of people attending college increases, the quality of the
education decreases. As stated in The Real Cost of Free College Tuition, there would be an
overcrowding in colleges. This excessive amount of students would result in a decrease in the
quality of education. A few reasons why this might occur is because of teachers converting to a
lecture style of class with the increase of students, less active student involvement, reduced
teacher-student interaction and feedback, a reduction in the depth of thinking, and lower
academic achievement and performance in large classes (Cuseo). This decrease in the quality of
education will leave the workforce with employees who are not able to perform at the level of
those who earned and paid for their college degree. Due to this imperative reason, college
tuition should not be free, even though more people would be able to have access to higher
education.
On the other hand, making college tuition free would provide "a more educated
population" that could "have economic and social benefits for the country" (Josephson). Many
free college tuition activists argue that this increase in college educated Americans would
"boost the country's productivity and DDP as people sorted themselves into more suitable,
higher-paying jobs" (Josephson). However, according to The Real Cost of Free College Tuition, if
a student does not invest money into their education, they are more likely to drop out. Free
college is like four more years of high school 23, this can also be seen in high schools across the
nation. Since the students are not invested in their education, they are likely to drop out and
acquire a low paying job. If these students were not able to make it through high school, what is
going to make them go through college? Also, "just less than 40 percent of college students
complete four-year degrees on time," "19 percent of full-time students at public universities
earn a bachelors degree in four years," and "a mere 50 of more than 580 public four-year
institutions graduate a majority of their full-time students on time thats only 8.6 percent"
(Eichen). These statistics show the amount of people who willing go to college do not complete
their schooling. Now imagine these numbers if the amount of students doubled or even
tripped. How will the economy and society be able to improve if the students that are going to
In conclusion, college tuition should not be free in the United States. Although there
would be positive side effects like more people having access to post-secondary education, and
a more educated population, there are downsides that outweigh the pros. One of these
drawbacks is that the taxpayers of America would have to contribute to paying for the tuition
because what is "free" in life is not always free. Also, the workforce would be negatively
impacted because of the amount of undereducated graduates trying to obtain jobs coming
from universities that have a degraded college degree. This is because as the number of
students in a classroom increases, the quality of the education decreases. Therefore, the cost of
going to college should not be eliminated. So, there is only one question that remains: is there
2 Simile- Shows a comparison between free college and free high school not being very different.
3 Analogy- This is an analogy/ simile.
an alternative to college that needs to be implemented in the United States in order to make
Works Cited
Beckstead, Rachel. "Statistics of College Dropouts." Online Colleges and Online Degrees |
dropout.html>.
Cuseo, Joe. "THE EMPIRICAL CASE AGAINST LARGE CLASS SIZE: ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE
<https://www.classsizematters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Week-13-Cuseo-
1.pdf>.
Eichen, Andrew. "The Real Cost of Free College Tuition." Washington University Political Review
cost-of-free-college-tuition-2/>.
Josephson, Amelia. "The Pros and Cons of Free College." SmartAsset. N.p., 15 Sept. 2016. Web.
college>.
Luhby, Tami. "Free College and Healthcare for All." CNNMoney. Cable News Network, n.d. Web.
<http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/16/news/economy/sanders-taxes-spending/?iid=EL>.