Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
We have seen from the earlier presentation the project is a new Sewage Treatment Plant
with the underground STP concept and with leisure and recreational park on top.
And 15m deep measured from the general ground level to the deepest point
182.4m
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
SKYLIGHT
VENTILATION
VENTILATION VENTILATION FOOT BALL
FIELD
VENTILATION
182400
SKYRIVER
SKYLIGHT
FUTSAL FUTSAL
COURTS COURTS
PARK
UNDERPASS
UNDERPASS
182400
UNDERPASS
The AAO Bio Reactors and Clarifiers are made up of 4 Tanks with internal
separation walls.
BALANCING
TANK
9900
9900
Clarifier
9900
9900
7000
9900
9900
Clarifier
9900
9900
Bio Reactor 1 Bio Reactor 2 Pipe Bio Reactor 3 Bio Reactor 4 Pipe
Base Slab Gallery Gallery
DEFORMATION JOINTS
Ventilation Shaft
LANDSCAPE ROOF
5500
UNDERPASS
16000
10500
Bio Reactor 5 Bio Reactor 6 Bio Reactor 7 Bio Reactor 8
Pipe
Gallery
DEFORMATION JOINTS
UNDERPASS
ENTRANCE
LONGITUDINAL SECTION OF
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE
2) Horizontal loads
Earth pressure
Water pressure
Dynamic loads from Equipments
3) Flotation
Buoyancy force
LOADING CONDITIONS
VERTICAL LOADS
The size of Tanks and position of walls are determined by Treatment Process
requirements, and the positions and spacing of columns are thus influenced by
Process/Mechanical requirements
Supports spacing, type and magnitude of loadings, speed of construction and cost are
factors that determine the floor system
HORIZONTAL LOADS
Another important consideration is the need to transfer lateral forces from earth /
water pressure from one side of the Underground Structure to the other.
Beams and slab of adequate stiffness are provided, this in turn allows the
tank walls to be designed as Propped cantilever.
FLOTATION
The dead weight, calculated from the weight of the concrete underground structure is
used to overcome the buoyancy load. BS8007 requires that a safety factor of 1.1 be
provided against flotation. For the structure here, this dead weight is less than the
buoyancy load. As such ground anchors tied to the floor slab are provided to meet the
safety factor requirement.
Conventional reinforced concrete beam and slab system for the Roof Deck
and Maintenance Floor Level.
Conventional reinforced concrete wall and base slab for the underground
structure.
Soil load
Buoyancy
Computer structural analysis programs were used to carry out the analysis of the
structure.
Although it is possible to model the whole structure as one model with the current
powerful software and hardware, however this was not done. Such a large model would
be very cumbersome and prone to input errors and time consuming to analyse.
The underground structure is made up of many smaller tanks with deformation joints
between some of them. Therefore we identified and selected suitable sections for
developing into 3D finite element models.
Most of the tanks are long compared to its width and height, therefore the end walls
have very little influence beyond 2 times the tank height. A 2D Plane Frame model
along the central portion of the tank is used to check the results of the 3D model.
The walls and base are designed based on the results of the 3D model and the
reinforcement are detailed manually.
The conventional beam and slab floors are detailed with the assistance of
reinforcement detailing softwares.
750.32
120.81
321.08
26
138.59 182.38 228.44 394.225
2966.825
4452.04 24
5273.13 23
5336.68 22
4549.05 21
2816.20
19
-3855.58
18
-8982.75
The underground concrete structure are designed based on the Code of Practice for
Design of Concrete Structures for Retaining Aqueous Liquids : BS8007:1987
The structures are checked for compliance with the requirements for strength at the
ultimate limit state using factored loads with maximum liquid levels.
Compliance to deflection and crack width were checked based on service load
conditions.
The code allows two methods of design to satisfy the requirements for the crack width.
One method is based on use of reduced allowable steel stresses for serviceability limit
state as provided in Table 3.1 of the code. The other method is based on checking of
crack width as provided in Appendix B of the code. In general the use of reduced
allowable steel stresses yield higher areas of reinforcement for the section, and as
such for the design here, crack width is checked in accordance with Appendix B of
the code
The maximum calculated design crack widths are either 0.2mm or 0.1mm depending
on the exposure conditions, instead of 0.3mm.
The basis of design is the serviceability limit state of cracking rather than the
ultimate limit state.
The design ultimate anchorage bond length in sections subject to direct tension
should not exceed 0.7 times the values obtained from BS8110.
In addition to using low heat cement, a chilled water plant is also set up
on site to ensure a lower concrete placing temperature
500
5500
300
Maintenance Floor Level
10500
1200
1800
3500
TYPICAL SECTION