PANDUAN TELAAH ARTIKEL PENELITIAN DIAGNOSIS

SECTION 1: INTERNAL VALIDITY

In a well conducted diagnostic study In this study this criterion is
(berikan tanda V pada pilihan
yang sesuai).
1.1 The spectrum of patients is representative of Well covered Not addressed
the patients who will receive the test in Adequately Not reported
practice. addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.2 Selection criteria are clearly described. Well covered Not addressed
Adequately Not reported
addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.3 The reference standard is likely to classify the Well covered Not addressed
condition correctly. Adequately Not reported
addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.4 The period between reference standard and Well covered Not addressed
index test is short enough to be reasonably Adequately Not reported
sure that the target condition did not change addressed Not applicable
between the two tests. Poorly addressed
1.5 The whole sample, or a random selection of Well covered Not addressed
the sample, received verification using a Adequately Not reported
reference standard of diagnosis. addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.6 Patients received the same reference Well covered Not addressed
standard regardless of the index test result. Adequately Not reported
addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.7 The reference standard was independent of Well covered Not addressed
the index test (i.e. the index test did not form Adequately Not reported
part of the reference standard). addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.8 The execution of the index test was Well covered Not addressed
described in sufficient detail to permit Adequately Not reported
replication of the test. addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.9 The execution of the reference standard was Well covered Not addressed
described in sufficient detail to permit Adequately Not reported
replication of the test. addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.10 Index test results were interpreted without Well covered Not addressed
knowledge of the results of the reference Adequately Not reported
standard. addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.11 Reference standard results were interpreted Well covered Not addressed
without knowledge of the results of the index Adequately Not reported
test. addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.12 Uninterpretable or intermediate test results Well covered Not addressed
are reported. Adequately Not reported
addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
1.13 An explanation is provided for withdrawals Well covered Not addressed
from the study. Adequately Not reported
addressed Not applicable
Poorly addressed
Section 2: OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE STUDY
2.1 How reliable are the conclusions of this study?
Code ++, +, or -
2.2 Were the same clinical data available when test results were
interpreted as would be available when the test is used in
practice?
2.3 Notes. Summarise the authors conclusions. Add any comments on your own
assessment of the study, and the extent to which it answers your question.

The following section is provided for non-SIGN users of this checklist and is being
developed to conform to the standards set by the Guidelines International Network
Evidence Tables Working Group.
Members of SIGN guideline groups do not need to complete this section.
Section 3: Description OF THE STUDY
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY (tuliskan jawaban pada kolom sebalah kanan pertanyaan).
3.1 How many patients are included in this study?
Please indicate number of patients included, with
inclusion/exclusion criteria used to select them.
3.2 What is the prevalence (proportion of people with the disease
being tested for) in the population from which patients were
selected?
3.3 What are the main characteristics of the patient population?
Include all relevant characteristics e.g. age, sex, ethnic origin,
comorbidity, disease status, community/hospital based