Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ACCT7104
07/04 registered seminar session. Mid semester exam
Good Friday 14/04. 7 10/04 Consolidation: Partly Owned Arthur et al Chapter 6; AASB 127 Separate Financial
Q6.1; Q6.5; Q6.6; Q6.8;
No Friday seminar this Subsidiaries (INCI) Statements; AASB 1024 Consolidated Accounts.
E6.1; E6.3; E6.8,
week.
Corporate Accounting
Easter Monday 17/04 Semester break: no classes or
17/04 consultation this week
Anzac Day Tuesday 25/04 8 24/04 Accounting for Joint Arthur et al Chapter 8; AASB 11 Joint Arrangements Q8.2; Q8.3; Q8.6; Q8.7;
(Census #2 date)
Arrangements/Joint Ventures E8.1; E8.5; E8.8.
May Day 9 01/05 The Equity Method Arthur et al Chapter 9; AASB 128 Investments in Q9.1; Q9.2; Q9.4; Q9.9;
Monday 01/05 Associates and Joint Ventures E9.2; E9.3; E9.8.
No Monday seminar this
week.
10 08/05 Foreign Currency Translation Arthur et al Chapter 10; AASB 121 The Effects of Case Study due Thursday
Seminar Five: Consolidation Direct Non-controlling Interests 11 15/05 Segment Reporting
Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Arthur et al Chapter 11; AASB 8 Operating Segments.
Q10.1; Q10.3; E10.2; E10.6
E11.1; E11.6.
12 22/05 External Administration and Dagwell et al Chapter 20 available at Q20.2; Q20.3; Q20.4;
Liquidation http://www.library.uq.edu.au/lr/acct7104 Problem 20.9;
Comprehensive Exercise
20.13.
13 29/05 Review and sample paper Sample final paper available on Blackboard Centrally organised final
walkthrough exam during exam period
SWOTVAC
1
28/03/2017
The parent entity is the entity that has the power to Non-controlling interests arise when a parent entity owns less than
control the relevant activities of other entities (AASB10) 100% of the issued shares of a subsidiary
its subsidiaries
Non-controlling interests can be direct or indirect
Control may be exercised directly or indirectly through
other subsidiaries Consider the following diagrams
Parent Ltd
Parent Ltd
80%
60%
Total 100% 100% 100%
Notes:
1. Indirect Non-Controlling Interests only occur in 3+ tier Group Subsidiary 2 Ltd
2. Distinction important as allocations differ between DNCI & INCI
2
28/03/2017
Parent Sub 1 Sub 2 Australian reporting requirements for consolidation are based on the
entity concept
Parent interest - direct 100% 80% 25%
- indirect - - 48%
Under the entity concept, the group (or consolidated entity) consists
of all entities under the common managerial control of the parent
Non-controlling interest - direct - 20% 15%
- indirect - - 12% Therefore, 100% of the resources of all subsidiaries are included in
the group accounts, even if the subsidiaries are less than 100% owned
The shares held by non-controlling shareholders in two or more Non-controlling interests in total comprehensive income for the period: on
the face of the consolidated statement of comprehensive income
subsidiaries do not carry the same rights not relevantly additive (AASB101.81(b)(i))
The equity interests of the non controlling shareholders are thus Non-controlling interests in total comprehensive income: disclosed in
disclosed as one-line items statement of changes in equity (AASB 101.106(a))
3
28/03/2017
Revaluation surplus xx xx yy yy
Totals xx xx yy yy
Total DNCI = xx + yy
4
28/03/2017
Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 25 Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 26
AASB 10 requires full elimination of intercompany Each relevant category of each subsidiarys equity will
transactions need to be adjusted for any intra-group transactions
This is consistent with the entity concept affecting NCI
Dividends are the only exception to this rule and are
always eliminated proportionately The starting point will always be the subsidiarys
unadjusted reported equity figure at the period end
Therefore, consolidation eliminations of intragroup
transactions must be analysed to determine their impact
(if any) on NCI The subsidiarys reported equity figures must be adjusted
Where relevant, NCI is adjusted for their share of such for relevant eliminations and unrealised profits before
eliminations allocation to NCI
When consolidation adjustments are prepared, it is Dividends paid by subsidiaries are eliminated proportionately on
important to note which company is affected by the consolidation
adjustment, as the relevant equity of that company will be
changed Therefore dividends attributable to direct NCI are always
included in the consolidated financial statements
It is also important to note what category of equity is Amounts relating to direct NCI share of dividends are reported
affected by the adjustment in the consolidated financial statements and, where relevant,
allocated to NCI
Direct NCI & direct entries to equity 29 Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 30
Brief Example 1
Some transactions or events give rise to direct entries to
equity/other comprehensive income Intra-group Closing Inventory consolidation adjustment (perpetual):
A has 80% subsidiary B. Bs current year (CY) reported profit = $40,000
Examples include an upward revaluation of assets or transfer B sells to A, URP at year end = $10,000, what is the effect of the adjustment on the
from/to reserves from retained profits NCI in CY profit?
Consolidation Adjustments
Where relevant, these direct entries will affect the
measurement of NCI Dr COGS 10,000 CY Profit of Sub B
Cr Inventory 10,000 Not equity
An exception is where a revaluation of assets to fair value at
control date is done on consolidation
Dr DTA 3,000 Not equity
Cr IT Expense 3,000 CY Profit of Sub B
5
28/03/2017
Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 31 Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 32
Brief Example 2
Brief Example 1 (continued)
Intra-group Closing Inventory consolidation adjustment (perpetual)
Thus, effect on NCI shown in a NCIMA:
A has 80% subsidiary B. Bs CY reported profit = $40,000
A sells to B, URP at year end = $10,000
Reported CY profit (Subsidiary B) 40,000 Consolidation Adjustments
Less: Inventory URP (10,000) Dr COGS 10,000 CY Profit of Parent A
Plus: Tax effect 3,000 Cr Inventory 10,000 Not equity
CY Profit (realised) to be allocated to NCI $33,000 Dr DTA 3,000 Not equity
Allocation to NCI @ 20% $6,600 Cr IT Expense 3,000 CY Profit of Parent A
Note: as there is no NCI in Parent, there is no adjustment to NCI in CY profit
Progressive Example
Y buys 80% Z on 1-Jan-20X0 for $500,000. Both use cost model.
Note that:
Date of Reporting is 31-Dec-20X1
1. Land FVA @ DOA = $300,000 Entity concept of group requires full value of all assets in consolidation
Fair Value Consolidation Adjustment Fair Value Consolidation Adjustment
If 100% owned ($000): However, NCI will need to be allocated part of the revaluation surplus
If only 80% owned ($000)
6
28/03/2017
Progressive Example
Note: 5. In 20X1, Z sold inventory to Y at profit $40,000, not sold externally in
20X1
No change because NCI exists Closing Inventory Elimination
Group basis requires full value of all assets in consolidation If 100% owned ($000) If only 80% owned ($000)
Consolidation Adjustment Consolidation Adjustment
However, NCI will need to be allocated part of RE and
current year (CY) profit Dr COGS 40 Dr COGS 40 (CY Profit of Z)
Cr Inventory 40 Cr Inventory 40 (Not equity)
7
28/03/2017
AASB3.19 now allows a choice between NCI is measured as the non-controlling shareholders
measuring NCI at date of acquisition by proportionate interest in the subsidiarys net assets
either:
No goodwill is imputed or allocated to the NCI
The proportionate interest goodwill
method; or Conventional and does not require calculation of the fair
value of the NCI at acquisition
The 100% goodwill method
8
28/03/2017
Dr. Issued capital 480 (600x80%) Owners equity 4,000 1,550 5,550 4,550 310 4,240
Dr. Reserves 320 (400x80%) Investment in Pan 1,200 1,200 1,200 ----
9
28/03/2017
Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 57 Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 58
Fred Ltd owns 75% of the issued shares of Wilma Ltd and controls it. Over the last Reported profits for the 2 companies over the two periods are as follows:
2 years (2012 and 2013) the following intra-group sales of inventory have 2012 2013
occurred between the 2 companies:
Fred $120,000 $155,000
Seller Year Transfer Price Cost Proportion in Proportion in Wilma $ 62,000 $ 74,000
inventory at y/e 2012 inventory at y/e 2013
Both companies have a 31 December year end and both use the periodic inventory
Fred 2012 $20,000 $15,000 50% URP = $2,500 0 URP = $0 system.
Wilma 2012 $12,000 $8,000 100% URP = $4,000 0 URP = $0
Retained profits at 1 January 2012 were Fred $100,000 and Wilma $30,000
2012 I/C sales =
$32,000 Assume no dividends paid or declared and no other transfers to/from retained profits
for the 2 years
Wilma 2013 $50,000 $40,000 NA URP = $0 80% URP = $8,000
The income tax rate is 30%
Fred 2013 $6,000 $4,000 NA URP = $0 100% URP = $2,000
Required: relevant consolidation adjustments for year-end 31 December 2012 and
2013 I/C sales =
31 December 2013.
$56,000
Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 59 Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 60
Consolidation Adjustments
Consolidation Adjustments 31 December 2012
31/12/12 Dr. Closing inventory (I/S) 6,500
Cr. Inventory (B/S) 6,500
Dr. Sales 32,000
(To eliminate unrealised profits in the closing inventory of Wilma $4,000 and
Cr. Purchases 32,000 Fred $2,500)
Dr. Deferred tax asset 1,950
(To eliminate intra-group sales of inventory made in 2012 by Cr. Income tax expense 1,950
Fred ($20,000) and by Wilma ($12,000)) (Tax effect of elimination for unrealised profit in closing inventory of Wilma
$1,200 ($4,000 x 30%) and Fred $750 ($2,500 x 30%))
10
28/03/2017
Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 61 Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 62
Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 63 Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 64
Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 65 Direct NCI & intra-group transactions 66
Consolidation Adjustments Consolidation Adjustments
31 December 2013 31 December 2013
Dr. Deferred tax asset 3,000 Dr. Retained profits 1/1/13 6,500
Cr. ITE 3,000 Cr. Opening inventory 6,500
(Tax effect of elimination for unrealised profit in closing inventory
(To adjust for unrealised profits in the opening inventory of
of Wilma $2,400 ($8,000 x 30%) and Fred $600 ($2,000 x 30%))
Wilma $4,000 and Fred $2,500)
Note: net profit effect on Fred is $1,400 ($2,000URP - $600Tax),
and on Wilma is $5,600 ($8,000URP - $2,400Tax)
11
28/03/2017
12