Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1 11. On October 22, 2013, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United
2 States Design Patent No. D692,047 (the D047 Patent), titled Eyeglass.
3 Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in in the D047
4 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D047 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit
5 C.
6 12. On December 4, 2007, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United
7 States Design Patent No. D556,818 (the D818 Patent), titled Eyeglass
8 Components. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest
9 in in the D818 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D818 Patent is attached
10 hereto as Exhibit D.
11 13. On May 8, 2012, the USPTO duly and lawfully issued United
12 States Design Patent No. D659,182 (the D182 Patent), titled Eyeglass and
13 Eyeglass Component. Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and
14 interest in in the D818 Patent. A true and correct copy of the D182 Patent is
15 attached hereto as Exhibit E.
16 14. Defendant makes, uses, sells, offers for sale, and/or imports into
17 the United States eyewear that have infringed Oakleys intellectual property
18 rights, including the D434 Patent, the D458 Patent, the D047 Patent, the D818
19 Patent, and the D182 Patent (the Asserted Patents).
20 15. Oakley has provided the public with constructive notice of its
21 patent rights pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 287.
22 16. Oakley manufactures and sells sunglasses under the mark
23 HOLBROOK bearing distinctive trade dress in the overall design of the
24 sunglasses (HOLBROOK Trade Dress). An example of an Oakley product
25 bearing the distinctive HOLBROOK Trade Dress is depicted in the photograph
26 attached as Exhibit F.
27 ///
28 ///
-3-
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 5 of 17 Page ID #:5
1 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
2 design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
3 the claim of the D047 Patent, including for example, Defendants Twist model
4 sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on
5 Defendants website http://coyoteusa.com/.
6 Accused Product Oakleys Patent
7 Twist U.S. Patent No. D692,047
8
9
10
11
12
13 29. Defendants acts of infringement of the D047 Patent were
14 undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and
15 belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed
16 in the D047 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout
17 the eyewear industry, and Defendants Twist model sunglass is a nearly identical
18 copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute willful
19 and intentional infringement of the D047 Patent. Defendant infringed the D047
20 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it
21 was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constituted
22 infringement of the D047 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement of the D047
23 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.
24 30. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and
25 continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D818
26 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
27 design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
28 the claim of the D818 Patent, including for example, Defendants Amp model
-7-
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 9 of 17 Page ID #:9
1 sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on
2 Defendants website http://coyoteusa.com/.
3 Accused Product Oakleys Patent
4 Amp U.S. Patent No. D556,818
5
6
7
8
9
10 31. Defendants acts of infringement of the D818 Patent were
11 undertaken without permission or license from Oakley. Upon information and
12 belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of Oakleys rights in the design claimed
13 in the D818 Patent. Oakley and its iconic designs are well-known throughout
14 the eyewear industry, and Defendants Amp model sunglass is a nearly identical
15 copy of Oakleys design. Accordingly, Defendants actions constitute willful
16 and intentional infringement of the D818 Patent. Defendant infringed the D818
17 Patent with reckless disregard of Oakleys patent rights. Defendant knew, or it
18 was so obvious that Defendant should have known, that its actions constituted
19 infringement of the D818 Patent. Defendants acts of infringement of the D818
20 Patent were not consistent with the standards of commerce for its industry.
21 32. Defendant, through its agents, employees, and servants has, and
22 continues to, knowingly, intentionally, and willfully directly infringe the D182
23 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing eyewear having a
24 design that would appear to an ordinary observer to be substantially similar to
25 the claim of the D182 Patent, including for example, Defendants Cancun
26 model sunglasses as shown below, which were sold and/or offered for sale on
27 Defendants website http://coyoteusa.com/.
28 ///
-8-
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 10 of 17 Page ID #:10
1 Elwood product shown above and any products that are not
2 colorably different therefrom;
3 2. using Oakleys HOLBROOK Trade Dress, and any other
4 trade dress that is confusingly similar to Oakleys
5 HOLBROOK Trade Dress;
6 3. unfairly competing with Oakley in any manner whatsoever;
7 4. causing a likelihood of confusion or injuries to Oakleys
8 business reputation
9 5. manufacturing, importing, marketing, advertising,
10 displaying, distributing, offering to sell, and/or selling any
11 goods that infringe Oakleys HOLBROOK Trade Dress;
12 F. That an accounting be ordered to determine Defendants profits
13 resulting from its trade dress infringement and unfair competition;
14 G. That Oakley be awarded monetary relief in an amount to be fixed
15 by the Court under 15 U.S.C. 1117, including:
16 1. all profits received by Defendant from sales and revenues of
17 any kind made as a result of its infringing actions;
18 2. all damages sustained by Oakley as a result of Defendants
19 acts of trade dress infringement, and that such damages be
20 trebled;
21 3. the costs of this action;
22 H. That such damages and profits be trebled and awarded to Oakley
23 pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1117;
24 I. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case, including each
25 of Oakleys patent infringement and Lanham Act claims;
26 J. That, because of the exceptional nature of this case resulting from
27 Defendants deliberate infringing actions, this Court award to Oakley all
28 ///
- 14 -
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 16 of 17 Page ID #:16
EXHIBIT A
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:19
USO0D674434S
Exhibit A Page 1 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:20
Exhibit A Page 2 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:21
FIG. 3
Exhibit A Page 3 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:22
FIG.
Exhibit A Page 4 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-1 Filed 04/27/17 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:23
Exhibit A Page 5 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-2 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:24
EXHIBIT B
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-2 Filed 04/27/17 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:25
USO0D469458S
Exhibit B Page 1 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-2 Filed 04/27/17 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:26
US D469,458 S
Page 2
Exhibit B Page 2 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-2 Filed 04/27/17 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:27
Exhibit B Page 3 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-2 Filed 04/27/17 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:28
Exhibit B Page 4 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-2 Filed 04/27/17 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:29
Exhibit B Page 5 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-3 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:30
EXHIBIT C
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-3 Filed 04/27/17 Page 2 of 7 Page ID #:31
USO0D692047S
Exhibit C Page 1 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-3 Filed 04/27/17 Page 3 of 7 Page ID #:32
US D692,047 S
Page2
Exhibit C Page 2 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-3 Filed 04/27/17 Page 4 of 7 Page ID #:33
Exhibit C Page 3 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-3 Filed 04/27/17 Page 5 of 7 Page ID #:34
Exhibit C Page 4 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-3 Filed 04/27/17 Page 6 of 7 Page ID #:35
Exhibit C Page 5 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-3 Filed 04/27/17 Page 7 of 7 Page ID #:36
Exhibit C Page 6 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:37
EXHIBIT D
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/17 Page 2 of 7 Page ID #:38
USO0D556818S
221E265 ms) Coll Baden Imne D536,026 s * 1/2007 Bruck .... .. D16/326
D537,467 S * 2/2007 Teng ....................... .. D16/326
Exhibit D Page 1 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/17 Page 3 of 7 Page ID #:39
Exhibit D Page 2 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/17 Page 4 of 7 Page ID #:40
Exhibit D Page 3 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/17 Page 5 of 7 Page ID #:41
Exhibit D Page 4 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/17 Page 6 of 7 Page ID #:42
FIG. 7
Exhibit D Page 5 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-4 Filed 04/27/17 Page 7 of 7 Page ID #:43
FIG. 8
Exhibit D Page 6 of 6
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-5 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:44
EXHIBIT E
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-5 Filed 04/27/17 Page 2 of 6 Page ID #:45
USO0D659182S
Exhibit E Page 1 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-5 Filed 04/27/17 Page 3 of 6 Page ID #:46
Exhibit E Page 2 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-5 Filed 04/27/17 Page 4 of 6 Page ID #:47
Exhibit E Page 3 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-5 Filed 04/27/17 Page 5 of 6 Page ID #:48
Exhibit E Page 4 of 5
Case 8:17-cv-00757 Document 1-5 Filed 04/27/17 Page 6 of 6 Page ID #:49
Exhibit E Page 5 of 5