Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Joshua Ahearn
Mr. Acre
AP Calculus
27 March 2017
Riemann Sums
Definite integrals are one of the four main concepts within calculus. A Riemann sum is an
excellent way to introduce the topic of a definite integral and an excellent way to approximate
the area underneath the curve. The Riemann sum can also be applied to other different topics in
There are multiple ways to use calculus to find the area under a curve. One of the
simplest ways to approximate the area under the curve is using a Riemann sum. A Riemann sum
involves creating rectangles on an interval under the curve, and finding the area of these
rectangles. The area under the curve is then found by adding the area of all these rectangles. An
Figure 1 shows an example of Riemann sums. For the equation above, rectangles were
inserted at a specific interval, and the area of these rectangles were summed to obtain the overall
The equation above shows how a Riemann sums estimates the area under a curve. To
mathematically find the value of Riemann sum, the equation Area x (h1 +h2 +h 3+ hn) can be
used. x represents the change in the x interval, which can be found by subtracting the limit
of integration b from the limit of integration a and dividing them by the number of intervals
desired. The h values can be finding f(a) and adding whatever the x comes out to equal to a
for the number of intervals. This formula will approximate the area under a curve.
A similar way to find area is by utilizing the trapezoid rule. This rule is essentially the
same as a Riemann sum, but instead of using rectangles, trapezoids are used in their place. An
Figure 2 displays an example of the trapezoid rule. For the equation above, trapezoids are
inserted at a specific interval, and the area of these trapezoids were summed to obtain the overall
area under the curve. The formal definition of the trapezoid rule is
x represents the change in the x interval, which can be found by subtracting the limit
of integration b from the limit of integration a and dividing them by the number of intervals
desired, just as for a Riemann sum. The x values can be finding f(x) and adding whatever the
x comes out to equal to a for the number of intervals. x is divided by two, because the
original trapezoid area formula is multiplied by one-half. The reason that the first and last terms
are multiplied by one and the middle terms are multiplied by two is due to the area formula for a
trapezoid. Since the middle intervals will share bases of the trapezoid, they need to be multiplied
by two to ensure they are being accounted for. Using this formula will find the area under the
curve.
Simpsons rule is another method of finding the area under a curve. Simpsons rule is also
similar to a Riemann sum or the trapezoid rule, but instead it uses parabola arcs to estimate the
Figure 3 displays an example of Simpsons rule. For the equation above, parabolic arcs
are inserted at a specific interval, and the area of these arcs were summed to obtain the overall
x represents the change in the x interval, which can be found by subtracting the limit
of integration b from the limit of integration a and dividing them by the number of intervals
desired, just as for a Riemann sum. The x values can be finding f(x) and adding whatever the
x comes out to equal to a for the number of intervals. x is divided by three, due to
mathematical manipulations that are used when integrating a second degree polynomial to obtain
the equation above. This also explains the coefficients in front of each of the variables being
added and then multiplied. Using this formula will find the area under the curve.
Ahearn 5
Using these methods are all accurate ways in approximating the area under the curve.
However, using Simpsons rule is the most effective way in approximating the exact area under
the curve. Due to the fact that parabolas are used to estimate the area, it does a better job at
getting the exact values than straight lines would able to. Between Riemann sums and the
trapezoid rule, the trapezoid rule is able to be more exact than a Riemann sum, because it is also
to somewhat slope the leg along the curve, rather than just drawing a straight line through a point
on the curve.
Figure 4 shows a graph of f (x)=( x3)4 +2(x3)34 (x3)+ 5 . Riemann sums can
be inserted into this graph to estimate the area underneath this curve. If two intervals are desired,
to determine x , 1 will be subtracted from 5 and then divided by 2. This makes x=2 ,
making the first interval span from one to three, and the second interval from three to five. This
can be used to find five different Riemann sums using points on the left or right, midpoints, the
highest value within the interval, and lowest value within the interval. Below is an example of a
Figure 5 shows the left Riemann sum for f (x)=( x3)4 +2(x3)34 (x3)+ 5 . The
x
x
x
f ( 2)
value of this sum can be found by , where x=2 , f ( 1)=13 , and
f ( 1)+
Area x
x x x
f ( 2)=5 . The values for f ( 1) and f ( 2) were found by plugging one into the
equation, since that is the leftmost point in the first interval, and plugging three into the equation,
since that is the leftmost point in the second interval. This gives the overall equation of
Area 2(13+5)=36 squareunits . This can also be found by finding the area of the first
rectangle and adding it to the second rectangle. The area of the first rectangles equals f (1)(2)
and the area of the second rectangle equals f (3)( 2) . Adding these results in
Ahearn 7
Area=[f (1)(2)]+[ f (3)(2)]=36 square units . The right Riemann sum can now be found, and
is displayed below.
Figure 6 shows the right Riemann sum for f ( x)=( x3)4 +2(x3)34 (x3)+ 5 . The
x
x
x
f ( 2)
value of this sum can be found by , where x=2 , f ( 1)=5 , and
f ( 1)+
Area x
x x x
f ( 2)=29 . The values for f ( 1) and f ( 2) were found by plugging three into the
equation, since that is the rightmost point in the first interval, and plugging five into the equation,
since that is the rightmost point in the second interval. This gives the overall equation of
Area 2(5+29)=68 squareunits . This can also be found by finding the area of the first
rectangle and adding it to the second rectangle. The area of the first rectangles equals f (3)(2)
Ahearn 8
and the area of the second rectangle equals f (5)( 2) . Adding these results in
Area=[f (3)(2)]+[f (5)(2)]=68 squareunits .The midpoint Riemann sum can now be found,
Figure 7 shows the midpoint Riemann sum for f (x)=( x3)4 +2(x3)34 ( x3)+ 5 .
x
x
x
f ( 2)
The value of this sum can be found by , where x=2 , f ( 1)=8 , and
f ( 1)+
Area x
x x x
f ( 2)=4 . The values for f ( 1) and f ( 2) were found by plugging two into the
equation, since that is the midpoint in the first interval, and plugging four into the equation, since
that is the midpoint in the second interval. This gives the overall equation of
Area 2(8+ 4)=24 square units . This can also be found by finding the area of the first
Ahearn 9
rectangle and adding it to the second rectangle. The area of the first rectangles equals f (2)(2)
and the area of the second rectangle equals f (4)(2) . Adding these results in
Area=[f (2)(2)]+[f (4 )(2)]=24 squareunits . The upper Riemann sum can now be found, and
is displayed below.
Figure 8 shows the upper Riemann sum for f ( x)=(x3)4 +2(x3)34 ( x3)+ 5 .
x
x
x
f ( 2)
The value of this sum can be found by , where x=2 , f ( 1)=13 , and
f ( 1)+
Area x
x x x
f ( 2)=29 . The values for f ( 1) and f ( 2) were found by plugging one into the
equation, since that is the highest value in the first interval, and plugging five into the equation,
since that is the highest value in the second interval. This gives the overall equation of
Ahearn 10
Area 2(13+29)=84 square units . This can also be found by finding the area of the first
rectangle and adding it to the second rectangle. The area of the first rectangles equals f (1)(2)
and the area of the second rectangle equals f (5)( 2) . Adding these results in
Area=[f (1)(2)]+[ f (5)(2)]=84 square units . The lower Riemann sum can now be found, and
is displayed below.
Figure 9 shows the lower Riemann sum for f ( x)=(x3)4 +2(x3)34 ( x3)+ 5 .
x
x
x
f ( 2)
The value of this sum can be found by , where x=2 , f ( 1)=5 , and
f ( 1)+
Area x
x x x
f ( 2) 3.12 . The values for f ( 1) and f ( 2) were found by plugging three into the
equation, since that is the lowest value in the first interval, and plugging 3.68 into the equation,
Ahearn 11
since that is the lowest value in the second interval. This gives the overall equation of
Area 2(5+3.12) 16.25 square units . This can also be found by finding the area of the first
rectangle and adding it to the second rectangle. The area of the first rectangles equals f (3)(2)
and the area of the second rectangle equals f (3.68)( 2) . Adding these results in
Now that each instance of a Riemann sum has been illustrated and calculated, the
trapezoid rule can be calculated. If four intervals are desired in the trapezoid rule, then
51
x= =1 . The trapezoid rule is illustrated below.
4
Figure 10 shows the trapezoid rule for f (x)=( x3)4 +2( x3)34 (x3)+ 5 . The
x
value of this sum can be found by Area ( f (x 1)+2 f ( x 2 )+ 2 f (x 3)+ f ( x 4 )+ f (x 5 )) , where
2
x x x x
x=2 , f ( 1)=13 , f ( 2)=8 , f ( 3)=5 , f ( 4)=4 , and f ( x5 )=29 .
Ahearn 12
The values for f (x) were found by one through five into the equation, since these values form
1
Area= [13+ 2(8)+ 2(5)+ 2(4)+29]=38 square units .
2
Simpsons rule can also be used on the equation. If four intervals are desired in
51
Simpsons rule, then x= =1 . Simpsons rule is shown below.
4
Figure 11 shows Simpsons rule for f ( x)=(x3)4 +2( x3)34 ( x3)+ 5 . The value
x x x x
f ( 1)=13 , f ( 2)=8 , f ( 3)=5 , f ( 4)=4 , and f ( x5 )=29 . The values for
f ( x) were found by one through five into the equation, since these are the points that the
Ahearn 13
1
Area= [13+4 (8)+2(5)+4 (4 )+ 29]=33.33 squareunits .
3
Depending on the method of approximation used, the value received could be very
different. The right and upper Riemann sum gave very large number, the lower Riemann sum
gave a very low number, and the rest of the approximations all gave a value somewhere near 30.
However, as stated earlier, Simpsons rule will be the most accurate in predicting the area under
the curve, or the most accurate at estimating the definite integral of the function. When the
definite integral from one to five is calculated on f(x) ( f (x)dx ), it gives a value of 32.8.
1
This shows that Simpsons rule was accurate to one decimal place. The trapezoid rule, left
Riemann sum, and midpoint Riemann sum all estimated the area under the curve fairly
accurately as well.
The Mean Value Theorem for Integrals, also known as the Average Value, finds another
way to represent the definite integral. It finds the value where if a rectangle was drawn using that
value as line along with the x-axis between the limits of integration, the area of that rectangle
would equal the area underneath the curve. The formula for the average value is f (x )dx .
a
Figure 12 shows the average value for the function displayed. The rectangle that was
drawn in has the same area as the under the curve. This can be applied to the example function
above using two rectangles. This makes the limit of integration for the first rectangle from one to
three, and the limit of integration for the second rectangle from three to five. This makes the first
3 5
Figure 13 shows the average value for the function used above. Since both heights came
out to equal 8.2, one rectangle was drawn. The height of this rectangle is 8.2 as calculated by the
Ahearn 15
MVT for integrals, and the width is 4 due to the limits of integration used. The area of this
rectangle is (8.2)(4)=32.8 , which is what the definite integral from one to five of f(x) is also
equal to. This proves that Mean Value Theorem for Integrals is true.
Since all the major topics surrounding Riemann sums are demonstrated above, they can
be applied to a problem. If the volume of a spherical hot air balloon expands as the air inside is
heated, the radius of the balloon, measured in feet, is modeled by a twice-differentiable function
r of time t, measured in seconds. For 0<t <12 , the graph is concave down. The table (shown
below) gives selected values of the rate of change, r(t), of the radius of the balloon over the time
interval given above. The radius of the balloon is 32 feet when t=7 .
Table 1 shows the values of the rate of change of the radius of the hot air balloon. The
radius of the balloon at t=7.2 s can be estimated by using the tangent line approximation at
t=7 s . The tangent line can be written since it is stated what the values of r(t) and r(t) are
given. The line tangent to t=7 s is r32=1.4(t7) . Plugging in 7.2 for t will give an
approximation for the radius at that time. By doing so, the equation becomes:
r32=1.4(7.27)
r=1.4 (7.27)+32
r=32.28 ft
The approximate radius of the balloon at t=7.2 s is 32.28 ft. Since r is concave down
on between 7 and 7.2, the estimate is greater than the actual value at t=7 s . The rate of
change of volume of the balloon with respect to time when t=7 s can be found as well by
utilizing the formula for the volume of a sphere. By taking the derivative of the volume formula,
Ahearn 16
4
V = r 3 , the radius can be plugged in and the change in volume can be found. The
3
derivative of the volume function is dV =4 r 2 r ' . Since it is stated that the radius at
t=7 s is equal to 32 feet, this value can be plugged into dV to find the rate of change in
volume at t=7 s . The value for r is also given in Table 1. Plugging in these values results in:
dV =4 (32)2 1.4
cubic feet
dV =5734.4
second
After plugging in the respective values, the change in volume of the balloon comes out to
cubic feet
equal 5734.4 . A right Riemann sum can now be used to approximate the area
second
underneath the curve from zero to twelve. However, since the table does not give equal intervals,
the typical Riemann sum formula cannot be used. However, the area can be found by multiplying
the right values (each r(t) value in the table except for the first) by the change in t and
12
Taking the right Riemann sum of r(t) results in an approximation of the area under curve
that equals 16.6 ft. This value represents the change in radius, measured in feet, over the interval
12
from t=0 s to t=12 s . This approximation is less than the actual value of r ' (t )dt ,
0
due to the fact that graph of r(t) is concave down, since the values of r(t) are decreasing.
Ahearn 17
Riemann sums are a very useful tool in calculus, and can be applied to many different
topics. It is an excellent way to approximate the area underneath a curve quickly when a
calculator may not be available to take the definite integral. It is also related to the Mean Value
Theorem for Integrals, by creating a rectangle that has the same area underneath a curve.
Riemann sums are a great introduction to definite integrals and hold extreme value in the world
of calculus.
Ahearn 18
Works Cited
Simmons, Bruce. "Mathwords: Trapezoid Rule." Trapezoid Rule. Mathwords, 2016. Web. 25
Simmons, Bruce. "Mathwords: Mean Value Theorem for Integrals." Mean Value Theorem for
<http://www.mathwords.com/m/mean_value_theorem_integrals.htm>.
<http://math.tutorvista.com/calculus/simpson-s-rule.html>.
Weisstein, Eric W. "Riemann Sum." Riemann Sum. Wolfram Mathworld, n.d. Web. 25 Mar.
2017. <http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RiemannSum.html>.