INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee : LEONORA C. OCULARES

Position : TEACHER - I
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality,Efficincy,Tim
per KRA

1.Teaching 40%
Learning Process
Scale Quality Efficiency

1.1. June 2016 March 5 All daily lesson 130% and above
Prepared180daily 2017 plans had the of the required
lesson plan and following parts: number of days
daily logs of Objective, DLL/Lesson Plan
activities within Content,Learning Submitted
4 Had 5 of the six 115-129% of the
the rating period Resources,
parts required number of
Procedures,
days DLL/Lesson
Remarks,
Plan Submitted
Reflection
the rating period

10% 3 Had 4 of the six 100-114% of the

parts required number of
days DLL/Lesson
Plan Submitted

2 Had 3 of the six 51-99% of the

parts required number of
days DLL/Lesson
Plan Submitted

1 Had 2 and below 50% and below of

of the six parts the required
number of days
DLL/Lesson Plan
Submitted
Scale Quality Efficiency

5 Instructional 130% and above of

Competence the required
shows an Overall number
1.2 Facilitated Rating of Five (5) Instructional
learning in Outstanding Supervision were
school/classes observed by the
evaluated with School Head
10%
functional
lesson/daily logs
June 2016-April
and innovative
2017 4 Instructional 115-129%% of the
teaching
strategies through Competence required number of
an observer with shows an Overall Instructional
the use of Rating of Four (4) Supervision were
Instructional VS observed by the
Supervision Tool School Head
(IST) 1
Observation per
grading period.
 2017 4 Instructional 115-129%% of the
teaching
strategies through Competence required number of
an observer with shows an Overall Instructional
the use of Rating of Four (4) Supervision were
Instructional VS observed by the
Supervision Tool School Head
(IST) 1
Observation per
grading period.
3 Instructional 100-114% of the
Competence required number of
shows an Overall Instructional
Rating of Three Supervision were
(3) S observed by the
School Head
 2 Instructional 51-99% of the
Competence required number of
shows an Overall of Instructional
Rating of Two (2) Supervision were
UnSat observed by the
School Head

1 Instructional 50% and below of

Competence the required
shows an Overall number of
Rating of One (1) Instructional
Poor Supervision were
observed by the
School Head

Scale Quality Efficiency

5 Have made Students were

conferences and guided in the
resolve the issue observation of
10% of students with classroom rules
disciplinary and guidelines was
concerns. 130% evident in
the certification
from the Grade
Head / School head
1.3 Implemented (for HS Department
positive discipline /Cur. Head)
to 100% of the
students by
instituting
classroom rules,
guidelines,
individual and
group tasks within June 2016-April
the rating period 2017
 4 Have made Students were
conferences and guided in the
resolve the issue observation of
withthe Grade classroom rules
Head of students and guidelines
1.3 Implemented
with disciplinary was115-129%
positive discipline
concerns. evident in the
to 100% of the
certification from
students by
the Grade Head /
instituting
School head (for HS
classroom rules,
Department /Cur.
guidelines,
Head)
individual and
group tasks within June 2016-April
the rating period 2017
3 Have made Students were
conferences and guided in the
resolve the issue observation of
with the Grade classroom rules
Head and and guidelines
Guidance was100-114%
Counselor of evident in the
students with certification from
disciplinary the Grade Head /
concerns. School head (for HS
Department /Cur.
Head)
 2 Have made Students were
conferences and guided in the
resolve the issue observation of
with the Grade classroom rules
Head, the and guidelines was
Guidance 51-99% evidentin
counselor and the certification
School Head for from the Grade
students with Head / School head
disciplinary (for HS Department
concerns. /Cur. Head)

1 Have made no Students were

conferences and guided in the
did not resolve observation of
the issue of classroom rules
students with and guidelines was
disciplinary 50% and below
concerns evident in the
certification from
the Grade Head /
School head (for HS
Department /Cur.
Head)
1.4 Monitored the
checking of
attendance and it Scale Quality Efficiency
was 100% 5 Conducted Daily attendance of
systematically interventions students has been
carried out June 2016-April such as ADM, carried out (100%)
through the 2017 5% 4 DLP, etc home
Conducted and Attendance
submission of other similar
visitations to checking was
Form 2 and Daily programs
attendance of
students. Has Zero
 was 100%
systematically
carried out
through the 4
submission of visitations to checking was
Form 2 and Daily parents
- Has 1of SARDO carried out or have
dropout
attendance of of all classes submitted only 9
students. Has Zero 3 Conducted school Attendance
dropout rate. conferences to checking was 100-
parents of SARDO 114% carried or
have submitted
only 8 out of 10
 2 Identified Attendance
Students At Risk checking was
of Dropping Out carried but have
1 Have no but no Attendance
(SARD) submitted only 7
intervention at all checking
action taken out of 10 was
Form 2
carried out or have
submitted only 6
and below out of 10
Form 2

Scale Quality Efficiency

1.5 Monitored 5 Overall Organized/structur
safe, positive and (1)physical ed classroom
motivating atmosphere,(2) setting allows for
environment, cleanliness and planned teacher-
overall physical orderliness of learner and learner
atmosphere classroom,(3) -learner interaction
conducive for toilet (4)assigned where cleanliness
learning, area, (5) proper and orderliness
cleanliness and waste disposal inside and outside
orderliness of were maintained the classroom was
classroom observed as (5)
including proper Excellent
waste disposal
daily and was
observed to have
at least Good(3)
rating every month
within the rating
period 4 Only 4 of the five The Classroom was
areas were observed as (4)
maintained Very Good
 within the rating
period

4 Only 4 of the five The Classroom was

June 2016-April areas were observed as (4)
2017 maintained Very Good
2 Only 2 of the five The classroom was
areas were observed (2)Basic
maintained
3 Only 3 of the five The classroom was
areas were observed (3)
maintained Good
2 Only 2 of the five The classroom was
areas were observed (2)Basic
maintained
1 Only 1 of the five The classroom was
areas were observed (1) Below
5% maintained Basic
2. Student
Outcomes 30%
 Scale Quality Efficiency
2.1. Monitored, June 2016-April 5% 5 Monitoring and Evidences showed
evaluated, and 2017 Evaluation of that the teacher
maintained Students purposely plans
students progress progress was assessments
as evident in the systematically through submitted
submission of 4 Monitoring
carried out and Evidences showed
(1)Formative/Sum
reports such as Evaluation of or
,without error that the teacher
mative Assessment
(1)Formative/Sum Students
revisions submitted only
Plans,(2) TQs 3
(3)
mative progress was out of 4 indicators
TOS, and (4) Class
Assessment Plans, carried out but per subject
Record every/ per
(2) TQs (3) TOS, with one error or grading period
subject / grading
and (4) Class revision period
Record every
quarter within the
rating period. 3 Monitoring and Evidences showed
Evaluation of that the teacher
Students submitted only 2
progress was out of 4 indicators
carried out but per subject /
with two errors or grading period
revisions

2 Monitoring and Evidences showed

Evaluation of that the teacher
Students submitted only 1
progress was out of 4 indicators
carried out but per subject
with three errors /grading period
or revisions
1 Monitoring and No Evidences
Evaluation of showed per
Students grading period
progress was
carried out but
with four errors
or revisions
2.2 Conducted
remediation
Scale Quality Efficiency
program to
improveat least 5 Evidences 130% and above of
75% of students showed that the the students who
needing academic teacher have were under
assistance. Or conducted remediation have
Enrichment remediation with improved their
activities for the following performance with a
students who June 2016-April MOVs (1)Simple passing grade in
excel in class. 2017 10% analysis of the Remedial Class
4 students
Evidences needing Mark / or of the
115-129%
academic
showed that the Enhancement
students who were
assistance
teacher or report
under remediation
those who excel
submitted only 4 have improved
in
outclasss,(2)
of 5 their performance
Attendance
indicators Sheet with a passing
(3)Lesson Plan grade in the
(4) Learning Remedial Class
Activity Sheet (5) Mark /
Certification of enhancement
the Remedial report
Class Mark or
enhancement
progress report
3 Evidences 100-114%of the
showed that the students who were
teacher under remediation
submitted only 3 have improved
out of 5 their performance
indicators with a passing
grade in the
Remedial Class
Mark /
enhancement
report

2 Evidences 51-99% of the

showed that the students and below
teacher who were under
submitted only 2 remediation have
out of 5 improved their
indicators performance with a
passing grade in
the Remedial Class
Mark /
enhancement
report
 1 Evidences 50% and below of
showed that the the students and
teacher below who were
submitted only 1 under remediation
out of 5 have improved
indicators their performance
with a passing
grade in the
Remedial Class
Mark /
enhancement
report

Scale Quality Efficiency

2.3Attained the 5 5% and above Made all the required
required NAT MPS increase in MPS students records
of at least 70.95%
(Elem) / 54.38% 10%
(HS)for SY 2016- 4 4% increase in One of the required
2017 MPS students records is
lacking
June 2016-April
2017
3 3% increase in Two of the required
MPS students records are
Lacking
2 2% increase in Three of the required
MPS students records are
lacking

1 1% increase in Four or more of the

MPS /maintained required students
previous SYs NAT records are lacking
result, or
decreased
 Scale Quality Efficiency
June 2016-April 5 Achieved 90-100 130% of the
2017 5% GSA students passed
4 Achieved 85-89
(outstanding) of 115-129%
the subjectofatthe
the
GSA (Very
all students students
end of thepassed
school
Satisfactory)
handled of the
yearsubject at the
all students end of the school
handled year
3 Achieved 80-84 100-114% of the
GSA students passed
(Satisfactory) of the subject at the
all students end of the school
handled year
2 Achieved 75-79 51-99% of the
GSA (Fairly students passed
Satisfactory) of the subject at the
2.4 Attained the all students end of the school
required GSA for handled year
grade level and 1 Achieved 74 GSA 50% and below
learning areas, at (Did Not Meet passed the subject
least 75% Expectations of at the end of the
(Efficiency) of the all students school year
students achieved handled
80% (quality) and
above proficiency.
Community
Involvement 10%
Scale Quality Efficiency
3.1 Conducted at 5 Conducted Conducted 5 or
least 4 parent parent- more PTA meetings
conferences to conference with and parent
students needing complete conferences
academic and documentation:
behavioral help.
3.1 Conducted at 5 Conducted 5 or
least 4 parent more PTA meetings
conferences to and parent
students needing conferences
academic and June 2016-April (Communication
behavioral help. 2017 5% Letter/
4 Attendance
Conducted Conducted 3-4PTA
Sheet/Minutes of meetings and
parent-
the Meetingwith
conference ) parent conferences
one lacking
document
 3 Conducted Conducted 2-3PTA
parent- meetings and
conference with parent conferences
two lacking
documents

2 Conducted Conducted 1 PTA

parent- meetings and
conference with parent conferences
only one
document/MOV

1 Have not Have not

conducted at all conducted at all

Scale Quality Efficiency

5 Accomplishments Conducted 6 or
of set visits with more Home
3% complete visitation and
4 components
Conducted students
Conducted were
4-5
(identification
parent- of given intervention
Home visitation
needs/problems,
conference with andand showed
studentsawere
causes,
document lacking passing grade in
given intervention
recommendation,
one component and showed aclass
the remedial
and agreement) markpassing grade in
the remedial class
mark

3.2 Conducted at
least 4 Home
visitation to
students needing
academic
 3 Conducted Conducted 2-
parent- 3Home visitation
3.2 Conducted at conference with and students were
least 4 Home document lacking given intervention
visitation to two components and showed a
students needing passing grade in
academic the remedial class
monitoring and mark
follow up within
the rating period
 2 Conducted Conducted 1 Home
parent- visitation and
conference with students were
document lacking given intervention
three and showed a
components passing grade in
the remedial class
mark

1 Have not Have not

conducted at all conducted at all

Scale Quality Efficiency

June 2016-April 5 Accomplishments 130% and above
2017 2% of Initiated initiated
projects/ projects/events/acti
(Activity
events/activities vities conducted
Proposal,
with external
Attendance,
funding/sponsors
Accomplishment
hip have
Report, Cert. of
complete
Completion,
documentation
Letter, Pictures)

3.3 Initiated 1
project/events/acti
vities with external
funding or
sponsorship within
the target date /
 4 Conducted Conducted 4-5
parent- Home visitation
conference with and students were
document lacking given intervention
3.3 Initiated 1 one component and showed a
project/events/acti passing grade in
vities with external the remedial class
funding or mark
sponsorship within
the target date /
participated in 3
3 Conducted Conducted 2-
community
parent- 3Home visitation
extension services
conference with and students were
2 Conducted
document lacking Conducted 1 Home
given intervention
parent- visitation
two components and showed a and
conference with students were in
passing grade
document lacking given intervention
the remedial class
three and
markshowed a
components passing grade in
the remedial class
mark

1 Have not Have not

conducted at all conducted at all

Professional Growth
and Development
10%
 Scale Quality Efficiency
5 Action Research Conducted one
conducted with action research
full
4 Action Research Submitted Action
documentation
conducted with Research Proposal
and recognized
full
by the School
documentation
Head
recognized by
the Master
Teacher/Dept.Hea
d

3 Submitted Action
Action Research research problem
with full
documentation
recognized by
the other teacher

4.1 Conducted 1 2 Identified Submitted intention

action research classroom / to conduct
based on students learning research within the
need analysis problems with rating period
using only 1-5 research
Action Research proposals
Template.
1 Have not No intention / plan
May 2016-April conducted at all to conduct Action
2017 2% Research
Scale Quality Efficiency
 4.2 Attended at
least 4
seminars/training
at the school,
5 Attended at the Attended at least
cluster and
International or four (4)
division level, May 2016-April 5%
Attended at the 1
national level seminars/trainings/
region, and 4 Attended
2017 regional
(seminars level / (2 workshop at least
national level three (3)
seminars/trainings/
division
AttendedLevel
relevant to
atthe
the 1
within the rating 3 Attended
workshop at least
assigned task// (2
division level three (2)
period
subject
cluster/ or
district
expertise) seminars/trainings/
level) / (3 school
workshop
level)
2 Attended at the Attended at least
cluster / district three (1)
level / (2 school seminars/trainings/
level) workshop
1 Attended at the Have not attended
school level at all
Scale Quality Efficiency
4.3. Submitted May 2016 - April 3% 5 Reports
required forms Submitted and
100% of the 2017 4 submitted
and reportsare were accomplished
Submitted and
required forms and 100 % free
accomplished
required from
forms 130% and above
accomplished115-
reports, as 3 errors
with one
and reportserror
were therequired
Submitted
129% of the forms
and
prescribed by the required forms
accomplished and reports
accomplished
required forms100-
and
school and
with reports
two formswere
errors 114%
reportsof the
2 required Submitted and
accomplished
and reports were required forms
accomplished 51-and
1 with three errors
accomplished Submitted
reports
99% of the and
with 4 or more accomplished
required forms 50%
and
errors and below
reports of the
required forms and
reports
5. Support to
Personnel
Administration 10%
Scale Quality Efficiency
4% 5 Without error/ 10 DTRs/F48 were
4 erasures and/or
With 1 error/ submitted (June-
10 DTRs/F48 were
lacking
erasure and/or March)
submitted (June-
attachments
lacking March)
attachment
3 With 2 errors/ 10 DTRs/F48 were
erasures and/or submitted (June-
lacking March)
attachments/
5.1 Submitted 10
with 1 EFLF
DTR/CSC Form
48In a school year 2 With 3 errors/ 9 DTRs/F48 were
every 3rd day of erasures and/or submitted (June-
1 With 4or more 8 and below
the succeeding lacking March)
errors/ erasures DTRs/F48 were
month without attachments
and/or lacking submitted (June-
error and with
attachments March)
complete
attachments
Scale Quality Efficiency
5 Incurred no Reported 130% and
tardiness/underti above days to
4 me
Incurred 1 tardy school/ mandated
Reported 115-
4%
or 1 undertime meetings/
129% daysspecial
to
for personal activities
school/ mandated
reasons meetings/ special
activities

5.2 Complied 180

days of attendance
without tardiness
 3 Incurred 2 Reported 100-
tardiness/ 114% to school/
undertime (or mandated
combination) for meetings/ special
personal reasons activities

2 Incurred 3-5 Reported 51-99%

5.2 Complied 180 tardiness/ to school/
days of attendance undertime (or mandated
without tardiness combination) for meetings/ special
and/or under time personal reasons activities
and reports on
time
1 Incurred 6 or Reported 50% and
more tardiness/ below days to
undertime (or school/ mandated
combination) for meetings/ special
personal reasons activities

Scale Quality Efficiency

2% 5 Complete 100% of the
prescribed required days in a
4 One element 95-99% of the
uniform quarter
missing (e.g. no required days in a
ID) quarter
3 Two elements 90-94% of the
missing required days in a
quarter
5.3 Worn complete 2 3 or more 85-89% of the
set of prescribed elements missing required days in a
uniform (ID, quarter
Blouse/Polo,
Slacks/Skirt,
Footwear) during
required days
 5.3 Worn complete
set of prescribed
uniform (ID,
Blouse/Polo,
Slacks/Skirt, 1 Not wearing 84% or less of the
Footwear) during prescribed required days in a
required days uniform quarter
Scale Quality Efficiency
6. Special Task
Assignment (If with
Plus Factor the

LEONORA C. OCULARES MELANIE C. CABRERA MARCELINO C. CABANA JR.

Ratee Rater APPROVING AUTHORITY
PCRF)

Name of Rater : MELANIE C. MIJARES

Position : MT - I
Date of Review : APRIL 17,2017

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
fficincy,Timeliness) SCORE
RESULTS RATING
Q E T Ave

Timeliness

130% of the DLL 5 5 5

submitted on time
or before the
deadline 4.9333 0.49
Submitted 1 day
after the prescribe
dates
Submitted 2 days
after the prescribe
dates

Submitted 3 days
after the prescribe
dates

Submitted 4 or more
days after the
prescribe dates

Timeliness

One Class
Observation per
(Except
grading for more
period
than the prescribed)

Two class 5 4 4
observations was
made in one grading
period 4.3333 0.43
(Except for more
than the prescribed)

Three (3) for

compliance class
observation were
made in one or two
grading periods.
(Except for more
than the prescribe)
Four or more class
observations were
made at the last
grading period for
compliance.

Four (4) class

observations were
done at the first or
last grading period
for compliance.

Timeliness

Within the rating 5 4 4 0.433

period

4.3333
Within the rating
period
 Timeliness
Submitted of form 2 4.3 4 4 4.2 0.210
on or before the
deadline
Submitted 1 day
after deadline
Submitted 1 day
after deadline

Submitted 2 days
after deadline
3
Submitted 3 days
after deadline

Submitted 4 days or
more or more after
deadline

Timeliness
4.3 4 4 0.205

4.1
 Timeliness
Updated within the
rating period

with one week 5 5 4 0.235

lapses

4.7
with two weeks
lapses

with three weeks

lapses
with four weeks or
more lapses
 Timeliness
Conducted within
the time frame of
every quarter (fifth
week of every
quarter)

Conducted one 4 4 4 0.40

week after the time
frame of every
quarter

4
Conducted two
weeks after the time
frame in every
quarter

Conducted three
weeks after the time
frame in every
quarter
conducted three
weeks or more after
the time frame in
every quarter

Timeliness
Always observed

Moderately observed 3 3 3

3 0.3
Sometimes observed
Seldom observed

Never
 Timeliness
Submitted Grading
Sheets, Class
Submitted Grading
Record before the 3 4 5 0.20
Sheets,
deadlineClass
Record during the
deadline
4.0333
Submitted Grading
Sheets, Class
Record a day after
the deadline

Submitted Grading
Sheets, Class
Record two days
after the deadline

Submitted Grading
Sheets, Class
Record more than
two days after the
deadline

Timeliness
Conducted
conferences for four
quarters
Conducted
conferences for four
quarters

4.3 5 4 0.22
4.4667
Conducted
conferences for
three quarters
Conducted
conferences for two
quarters only

Conducted
conferences for 1
quarter only

Timeliness
Organized and 5 5 5 0.15
facilitated on the
prescribed dates 4.9333
Organized and
facilitated one day
after prescribed
dates
Organized and
facilitated two days
after prescribed
dates
Organized and
facilitated three
days after
prescribed dates

Organized and
facilitated four days
or more after
prescribed dates

Organized and
facilitated on the
prescribed dates
Organized and 4 4 4
facilitated one day
after prescribed
dates

4 0.08
Organized and
facilitated two days
after prescribed
Organized
dates and
facilitated three
days after
prescribed dates

Organized and
facilitated four days
or more after
prescribed dates
 Timeliness
Within the rating
period

1 1 1 0.02

1
Timeliness
Arrived at the venue
on or before the
activity started
Arrived at the venue 5 5 5 5.00 0.25
5 minutes after the
Arrived
activity at the venue
started
10 minutes after the
activity started

Arrived at the venue

15 minutes after the
activity started

Arrived at the venue

20 minutes and
beyond after the
Timeliness
activity started
Submitted on or
before the one
Submitted deadline
day 4 4 4 0.12
after the deadline 4.00
Submitted two days
after the deadline
Submitted three
days after the
Submitted
deadline three (4)
days or more after
the deadline
 Timeliness
On the 1st day of the 5 5 5 5.00 0.20
succeeding month
On the 2nd day of
the succeeding
month

On the 3rd day of

the succeeding
month

On the 4th day of the

succeeding month
On the 5th day of the
succeeding month

Timeliness
Arrived 15 minutes 4 4 4 0.16
before the official 4.00
time
Arrived 10-14
minutes before the
official time
Arrived 9-5 minutes
before the official
time

Arrived 4-3 minutes

before the official
time

Arrived on the exact

time

Timeliness
4 4 4 4.00 0.08
Timeliness
4 4 1 3.00 0.15

OVER ALL RATING 4.34

MARIA INEZ ASUNCION , CESO V

Schools Division Superintendent
 CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Name of Employee : LEONORA C. OCULARES
Position : TEACHER - I
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017
COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES Teamwork
1
Self-Management
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development. 5 5 4 2
4.6667

Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear

2 and purposive and takes into account personal goals and 5 5 4 4.6667 4.6667
3
values congruent to that of the organization.

Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is 4

3 challenged by higher goals 5 5 5
5
5
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts,
4 5 5 3
checklists, etc.) to achieve goals. 4.3333
Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and
5 5 5 4
others 4.6667
Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE
5 5 5 1
Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the 5
1 Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials 2
and employee (RA 6713).

5 5 5 5 4.8667
 5 5 5 5 4.8667 3
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct
2 taking into account the impact of his/her actions and
decisions.

4
Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity
3 of attendance and punctuality, good grooming and 5 5 5
communication.
5
5

4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs. 5 5 3

4.33

Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the

5 organization's needs, improves systems and help others 5 5 5
improve their effectiveness.
5
Result Focus RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE Innovation
1
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources
1 4 4 5
most of the time. 4.3333
2
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work
2 methods by placing organizational needs before personal 5 5 5 5 4.87
needs.

Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming 3

to standard operating procedures correctly and consistently.
3 Able to produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of 5 5 5
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no
supervision required. 5
Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration 4
4 at waste or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise 5 5 5
ways of meeting goals set. 5
5
Makes specific changes in the system or in own work
methods toimprove performance. Examples may include
5 doing something better, faster, at alower cost, more 5 5 5
efficiently; or improving quality, costumer satisfaction,
morale, without setting any specific goal.
5
CORE SKILLS Computer / ICT Skills
Oral Communication
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE 1

1 Follows instructions accurately. 4.733

5 5 5 5 2

2
Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately. 5 5 5 5 3

3 Uses appropriate medium for the message.

4 4 4 4 4
4
Adjust communication style to others. 5 5 5 5 5
Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an
5
objective. 5 5 4 4.6667
Written Communication RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE

Knows the different written business communication formats

5 5 5
used in the DepEd.
1 5

Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative

and descriptive report based on ready available information
5 5 5 5 4.8
data with minimal spelling or grammatical error/s (e.g.
Memos, minutes, etc.)
2
Secures information from required references (i.e.,
Directories, schedules, notices, instructions) for specific 5 5 5
3 purposes. 5
Self-edits words, numbers, phonetic notation and content, if 4 4 4
4 necessary. 4

Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conciseness, and

5 5 5
effectiveness in his/her written communications.
5 5
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates
Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.
NCIES
Name of Rater :
Position : MT - I
Date of Review : APRIL 17,2017

Teamwork RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE

4 4 4
Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty. 4
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to 5 5 5 5 3.6
teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
organization

Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win- 4 4 4

win agreements. 4

Drives consensus and team ownership of 5 5 5

decisions. 5

Works constructively and collaboratively with

others and across organizations to accomplish 4 4 4
organizational goals and objectives.
4
Service Orientation
RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE
Can explain and articulate organizational
4 4 4 4 4.2
directions, issues and problems.
Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with
and/or correcting costumer service issues and 5 4 4 4.3
concerns
 5 5 5
Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for
men and women empowerment. 5

Participates in updating of office vision,

mission, mandates & strategies based on 4 4 3
DepEd strategies and directions.
3.7

Develops and adopts service improvement

programs through simplified procedures that 4 4 4
will further enhance service delivery.
4
Innovation RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE
Examines the root cause of problems and
suggests effective solutions. Fosters new ideas,
4 4 4
processes, and suggests bettter ways to do 4
things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the
box". Continuously focuses on improving
4 4 4 4 3.9333
personal productivity to create higher value
and results.

Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-

4 4 4 4
workers to develop original ideas or solutions.

Translates creative thinking into tangible

changes and solutions that improve the work 4 4 4
unit and organization. 4

Uses ingenious methods to accomplish

responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness
and the ability to succeed with minimal
resources.
3 4 4 3.7
Computer / ICT basic
Prepares Skillscompositions ( e.g., letters, RATEE RATER SCH.HEAD AVE
reports, spreadsheets and graphic
Identifies different computer parts, turns the
4.2
presentations
computer on/off,using
andWord
workProcessing
on a givenandtaskExcel.
with 5 5 5 5
acceptable speed and accuracy and connects
computer peripherals ( e.g., printers, modems,
multi-media projectors, etc.) 4 4 4 4

Prepares simple presentations using

Powerpoint.
Utilizes technologies to : access information to 3 3 3 3
enhance professional productivity, assists in
conducting research and communicate through
local and global professional networks. 4 4 4 4
Recommends appropriate and updated
technology to enhance productivity and
professional practice. 5 5 5 5
 IPCRF OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS 4.34

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.43

4.386
onstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -Teachers

Name of Employee : LEONORA C. OCULARES Name of Rater :
Position : TEACHER - I Position :
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT Date of Review :
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017

PART III:SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance
Results Rating Adjectival Rating
Accomplishments of
KRAs and Objectives 4.39 VERY SATISFACTORY

Rater-Ratee Agreement
Name of employee: LEONORA C. OCULARES Name of Superior:

Signature Signature

Date: April 17, 2017 Date

LEONORA C. OCULARES MELANIE C. MIJARES MARCELINO C. CABANA JR. PhD

TEACHER I MASTER TEACHER I PRINCIPAL II

Ratee Rater Approving Autho

 MELANIE C. MIJARES
MT - I
APRIL 17,2017

Marcelino C. Cabana Jr.,Ph.D.

C. CABANA JR. PhD

PRINCIPAL II

Approving Authority
Name of Employee : LEONORA C. OCULARES
Position : TEACHER - I
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XI
Division of Davao City

DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT

WIRELESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Fr. Selga St. Davao City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR

June 2016-March 2017

EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK FORM

Strengths Development Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed

KRA I: TEACHING AND The use of Four and above indigenized, November to February Updated knowledge/ trainings on
indigenized, contextualized and localized the different custom and beliefs
LEARNING PROCESS contextualized and instructional materials have SY:2016 - 2017 of the community.
1.Prepare daily localized materials been utilized.
lesson log (computerized)
 The use of Four and above indigenized, Updated knowledge/ trainings on
indigenized, contextualized and localized the different custom and beliefs
contextualized and instructional materials have of the community.
localized materials been utilized.
(computerized)

KRA II: PUPILS / Attaining 85% MPS Percentage of NAT test shall November to February NAT Reviewer, Test Questioner
STUDENTS LEARNING per subject area in have been increased to 85%.
OUTCOMES the NATIONAL
1.Maintain pupils/ students ACHIEVEMENT TEST. SY:2016 - 2017
school records

KRA III: COMMUNITY Home visitation / Ten Home visitation shall be November to February Availability of time to both parent
INVOLVEMENT students needing done to students needing and teacher concerned.
academic monitoring. academic monitoring/follow
up.

1.Conduct SY:2016 - 2017

regular/periodical PTA
meeting/conference

KRA IV: PROFESSIONAL Conducting action Attending trainings and November to February Related Literature Books and
GROWTH AND plan research seminar on action research other resources
DEVELOPMENT plan shall have been done.

1.Atten SY:2016 - 2017

ded
relevan
t
training
KRA V: PLUS FACTOR Publish an article in Conducting studies related to November to February Reading books, Related Literature
National Circulation. National Circulation shall been Books and other resources.
done.
 Publish an article in Conducting studies related to Reading books, Related Literature
National Circulation. National Circulation shall been Books and other resources.
done.
1. SY: 2016 - 2017
Particip
ated in
any
activitie
s as
teachers
associat
ion and
serve as
coordin
ator in

Feedback: Ratee

To produce skillful individual I shall make my teaching and learning process more functional and meaningful,180 daily lesson log with indigenized and localized instructional materials shall have been
shall have been enrich and attend seminars that developed professionally and 85% of the NAT result shall have been achieved.

Feedback: Rater
Mid year evaluation targets have been accomplished up to 25%
LEONORA C. OCULARES MELANIE C. MIJARES
TEACHER - I MASTER TEACHER I
Rater Ratee
LEONORA C. OCULARES MELANIE C. MIJARES
TEACHER II MASTER TEACHER I
Rater Ratee
 Name of Rater : MELANIE C. MIJARES
Position : MT - I
Date of Review : APRIL 17,2017

ELOPMENT PLANS
of the Philippines
ent of Education
egion XI
of Davao City

NTRAL DISTRICT
EMENTARY SCHOOL
St. Davao City

NT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

16-March 2017

FEEDBACK FORM

Budget
Proposal/Person
involved
 P600.00/Teacher,
Principal,
Parents/Guardians

P600.00/Teacher
Adviser, academic
teacher, parents

P200.00Parents,
Teacher, Guidance
Coordinator, Parents

P500.00 Resource
Speaker, Teacher,
Principal,

Participants/responde
nts

P500.00
Teacher,Principal,
Respondent, Resource
Individual, Coordinators
 P500.00
Teacher,Principal,
Respondent, Resource
Individual, Coordinators

alized instructional materials shall have been prepared and update knowledge on the custom and beliefs of the community. Community activities involvement
 . MIJARES MARCELINO C. CABANA JR. PhD
EACHER I PRINCIPAL II
ee Approving Authority
MELANIE C. MIJARES MARCELINO C. CABANA JR. PhD
MASTER TEACHER I PRINCIPAL II
Ratee Approving Authority
Name of Employee : LEONORA C. OCULARES
Position : TEACHER - I
Division/Section : DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT
Rating Period : JUNE - APRIL 2017

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XI
Division of Davao City
DAVAO CENTRAL DISTRICT
WIRELESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Fr. Selga St. Davao City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

June 2016-March 2017

EMPLOYEE FEEDBACK FORM

Strengths Development Needs Action Plan Timeline Resources Needed

(Recommended
Developmental Intervention)

KRA I: TEACHING AND
LEARNING PROCESS
1.Prepare daily lesson log
The use of indigenized, Four and above indigenized, November to Updated knowledge/
contextualized and localized contextualized and localized February trainings on the
materials (computerized) instructional materials have SY:2016 - 2017 different custom and
been utilized. beliefs of the
community.
 The use of indigenized,
contextualized and localized
materials (computerized)
Four and above indigenized, Updated knowledge/
contextualized and localized trainings on the
instructional materials have different custom and
been utilized. beliefs of the
community.

KRA II: PUPILS / STUDENTS
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1.Maintain pupils/ students
school records
Attaining 85% MPS per Percentage of NAT test shall November to NAT Reviewer, Test
subject area in the NATIONAL have been increased to 85%. February Questioner
ACHIEVEMENT TEST.
SY:2016 - 2017
KRA III: COMMUNITY Home visitation / students Ten Home visitation shall be November to Availability of time to
INVOLVEMENT needing academic monitoring. done to students needing February both parent and
1.Conduct regular/periodical academic monitoring/follow SY:2016 - 2017 teacher concerned.
PTA meeting/conference up.

KRA IV: PROFESSIONAL Conducting action plan Attending trainings and November to Related Literature
GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT research seminar on action research February Books and other
plan shall have been done. resources

1.Attended SY:2016 - 2017

relevant
trainings /
workshop.
KRA V: PLUS FACTOR Publish an article in National Conducting studies related to November to Reading books, Related
Circulation. National Circulation shall been February Literature Books and
1. done. SY: 2016 - 2017 other resources.
Participated
in any
activities as
teachers
association
and serve as
coordinator
in any
subject

Feedback: Ratee

To produce skillful individual I shall make my teaching and learning process more functional and meaningful,180 daily lesson log with indigenized and localized instructional materials shall have been
community. Community activities involvement shall have been enrich and attend seminars that developed professionally and 85% of the NAT result shall have been achieved.

Feedback: Rater
Mid year evaluation targets have been accomplished up to 25%
Feedback: Principal

LEONORA C. OCULARES MELANIE C. CABRERA MARCELINO C. CABANA JR.

Ratee Rater APPROVING AUTHORITY
 Name of Rater : MELANIE C. MIJARES
Position : MT - I
Date of Review : APRIL 17,2017

T PLANS

T
HOOL

W FORM (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS

RM

Budget Proposal/Person
involved
 P600.00/Teacher,
Principal,
Parents/Guardians
P600.00/Teacher Adviser,
academic teacher, parents
 P200.00Parents, Teacher,
Guidance Coordinator,
Parents

P500.00 Resource
Speaker, Teacher,
Principal,

Participants/respondents

P500.00 Teacher,Principal,
Respondent, Resource
Individual, Coordinators

d localized instructional materials shall have been prepared and update knowledge on the custom and beliefs of the
all have been achieved.
ARCELINO C. CABANA JR. MARIA INEZ ASUNCION , CESO V

APPROVING AUTHORITY Schools Division Superintendent