Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Professor Agosta
UWRT 1101-006
17 January 2017
Based off what the syllabus has stated, critical reading is having the ability to
read into what has been put in front of you. It does not matter what form of
what the writer is trying to convey to his/her audience. On top of that you
should be able to follow a thought trail that the author has. Which might be
quite difficult at times, but you should still be able to do so. Also, can tell the
difference between factual data and just word of mouth from someone.
Basically, able to fully understand what is being read and connect different
parts of the text even though the connection might be paragraphs apart from
one another.
Literacy is hard to describe. Just like in this essay that we are currently
reading. It all depends on where you are from and what you feel literacy
passages or webpages. But as I read more and more, the reading started to
sway my mind some. Now Literacy to me means how literate someone might
be based off their past and exposure to this form of communication. Say for
instance you have an indigenous population who have never been exposed
to anything written in their entire life and ancestors lives. And suddenly you
throw them into a writing class and give them a grade based off how well
bunch of college level kids into a computer engineering class and gave them
a schematic of an electrical circuit, and gave them a grade based off how
they understood the schematic. Both situations would not end up very well
for both parties. But to those of us who have been exposed to these different
My last response plays into my thought process about how this can be tricky
has our literacy, depending on who you are and what background you have.
It is tricky also because the term itself is a moving target or a fluid concept.
You cant always shoot in the same spot on a moving target. If you do, youll
miss a good bit of the time. The same goes for the definition of Literacy.
Well Scribner seems to be coming at literacy from a more If you dont know
words and cant write them, then youre not literate. To me this is not
accurate. Someone who has never been exposed to words or writing can still
draw what they see. Hieroglyphics are a prime example. They are not words
so to speak. But someone who could write/draw them, would be more literate
individual, this is essentially how the person or persons can contribute. Each
individual person brings something to the table and has a big melting pot of
has made a standard in the current time. Which also means that the
children with the literacy skills that will enable them to fulfill these
I 100% agree with this statement. This is a world that is growing fast, I have
seen people get left behind due to lack of knowledge on how to act or how
Again, going back to my moving target statement earlier. You cannot put a
You honestly can take them into account. For a brief period. And after you
have taken the variations into account, you must go back and do it again.
- While functional literacy stresses the importance of literacy to the
advancement page 11
would not progress any further. Without growth, then we will become
This is one problem that has caused confusion amongst the ages. Just
because someone can read and write should not make them a better person
than others who cannot do the same. But as a society, we continue to belittle
the persons who do not have the higher literacy standard as others. A prime
I can see some truth in this, but it still plucks at a string inside of me. Not in a
good way. If youre defining literacy as the ability to learn, then yes this
simple task everyone must do even before we can talk or walk. The truth
side of the statement is as follows, yes you should be able to read and write